Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 -- 2457 2022-08-30 11:54:54 |
2 format correct Meta information modification 2457 2022-08-31 02:56:23 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Bijekar, S.;  Padariya, H.D.;  Yadav, V.K.;  Gacem, A.;  Hasan, M.A.;  Awwad, N.S.;  Yadav, K.K.;  Islam, S.;  Park, S.;  Jeon, B. Wastewater Treatment in Developing Nations. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/26667 (accessed on 19 May 2024).
Bijekar S,  Padariya HD,  Yadav VK,  Gacem A,  Hasan MA,  Awwad NS, et al. Wastewater Treatment in Developing Nations. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/26667. Accessed May 19, 2024.
Bijekar, Sangha, Hemanshi D. Padariya, Virendra Kumar Yadav, Amel Gacem, Mohd Abul Hasan, Nasser S. Awwad, Krishna Kumar Yadav, Saiful Islam, Sungmin Park, Byong-Hun Jeon. "Wastewater Treatment in Developing Nations" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/26667 (accessed May 19, 2024).
Bijekar, S.,  Padariya, H.D.,  Yadav, V.K.,  Gacem, A.,  Hasan, M.A.,  Awwad, N.S.,  Yadav, K.K.,  Islam, S.,  Park, S., & Jeon, B. (2022, August 30). Wastewater Treatment in Developing Nations. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/26667
Bijekar, Sangha, et al. "Wastewater Treatment in Developing Nations." Encyclopedia. Web. 30 August, 2022.
Wastewater Treatment in Developing Nations
Edit

Water is the founding fundamental of life and hence is a basic need of life. Due to poor water quality and sanitation problems, most health issues are caused by water-borne infections. In developing countries, untreated wastewater is released into water bodies or the ground, thereby polluting natural resources. This is due to the lack of sufficient infrastructure, planning, funding, and technologies to overcome these problems. Additionally, the urbanization of megacities in developing countries is highly accelerated, but it is disproportionate to the required resources for treating wastewater. 

unsustainable urbanization biodegradable wastewater treatment

1. Introduction

No life form on earth can exist without water. Human civilization is dependent on water for domestic and industrial purposes. It is one of the most precious assets on this planet. The earth’s surface consists of 71% water, but only 0.3% is usable (National Ground Water Association) as shown in Figure 1. Our water demand is fulfilled from underground, rivers, wells, and streams [1]. The earth is a closed system i.e., it does not allow the transfer or exchange of any matter including water. Hence, water is a limited resource. The water that was present billions of years ago is the same that we are using now. Mother earth maintains the water quantity and quality through the hydrological cycle. This substantiates the need of reusing water for our domestic and industrial purposes. Chemically, water is a universal solvent; it is tasteless, odorless, and colorless. Owing to this nature, water leaches minerals from nature that make it more beneficial for drinking purposes [2]. But due to the same characteristic, water also dissolves natural and artificial harmful chemicals like cancer-causing metals, pesticides [3], detergents [4], and industrial wastes that may make it toxic and unusable. The quantity of such toxic matter present in water determines its quality.
Figure 1. Distribution of earth water.
The organic and inorganic matter present in water makes it an ideal medium for microbial growth. The main cause of microbial contamination in natural water resources is the discharge of waste from domestics, organizations, hospitals, industries, etc. [5]. The use of untreated water could result in the declension of the ecosystem and public health. Contaminated water can transmit diseases such as diarrhea, cholera, dysentery, typhoid, and polio. It is estimated that drinking contaminated water causes 485,000 diarrheal deaths each year (WHO) [6][7].
Water pollution is increasing due to contemporary civilization accompanied by modern industries and the booming economic system. The direct and untreated discharge of used water from urban drainage and industries into rivers is a major cause of the degradation of water quality [8][9]. This is due to either lack of awareness, inappropriate drainage system, or unavailability of wastewater treatment plants [10][11][12]. Due to unawareness, residents dump their waste products into seas, streams, rivers, ponds, and lakes thinking of water bodies as the final home of waste material. Such human activities are not only responsible for spoiling water quality, but also for affecting aquatic life [13][14]. There is an urgent need to address these problems and employ the best water treatment methods. It is a challenge for humankind to make sustainable development in civilization without damaging the environment. When water is used for domestic and industrial purposes, the used water carries deleterious constituents. According to the United Nations (UN), about 80% of sewage is currently discharged without treatment [15][16][17]. The untreated water either sinks into the ground polluting groundwater, or flows into our natural resources and contaminates them [18][19][20][21]. Water management is a global issue [22][23]. Across the globe, countries are facing problems over the insecurity of water and water contamination. But the challenge of water quality and safety is more severe in developing nations. In order to reuse water efficiently, proper waste management policies and infrastructure are quintessential. Water scarcity and sanitation are global problems; however, they are more pronounced in developing nations [21]. In 1996, food and agriculture organizations (FAO) stated that the water quality programs that are run in countries collect the wrong sample from the wrong place using the wrong substrate, at wrong sampling frequencies, and produce unreliable data and this is most commonly observed in developing countries (FAO, 1996). The water supply and sanitation, and the World Health Organization (WHO) have estimated that 25% of urban and 82% of the rural population of developing countries lack access to safe drinking water and sanitation services (CNES, 2003).

2. Sources of Wastewater

Wastewater is produced largely due to human activities. Water gets polluted from two major sources—point source (PS) and non-point source (NPS) as shown in Figure 2 [24]. When the source of pollutant is identifiable and it is released through the pipe, channels, or tunnels it is called a point source. Examples of PS are effluent released through pipes from homes, commercial areas, hospitals, wastewater treatment, and industries. Whereas, when pollutant enters the water resources via unidentifiable sources then it is known as NPS [24][25]. Examples of NPS are run-offs from agriculture, forests, mines, stormwater, etc.
Figure 2. Sources of Water Pollution.
Monitoring and regulating the non-point source of water pollution is one of the biggest challenges for the scientific community and authorities [26][27]. Dealing with the non-point source of water pollution is analogous in developing and developed countries [28]. However, it is more conspicuous in developing countries than developed countries due to the insufficient infrastructure, unplanned and unsustainable urbanization, and lack of updated technology [29][30][31]Table 1 is showing various types of sources of water pollution.
Table 1. Sources of water pollution along with their side effects.

3. Composition of Wastewater

The world’s freshwater resources are becoming increasingly polluted with organic waste, pathogens, fertilizers and pesticides, heavy metals, and emerging pollutants [44]. The organic and inorganic matter released from point and non-point water polluting sources is causing a reduction in river dilution capacity [45]. Domestic wastewater is discharged from homes and communities. Domestically, water is used for washing, cleaning, and flushing. Hence, used water carries soluble and non-soluble solid material. The domestic wastewater released due to washing, laundering, bathing, or showering is called Grey Water. The Domestic wastewater released from toilets or urinals is called Black Water [46] (Environmental protection Agency, 2021). The black wastewater is rich in organic matter and mostly biodegradable, it acts like nutritional media for pathogenic microbial growth, and hence it becomes hazardous and septic [47][48][49].
Industrial wastewater is an aqueous discharge released by industries. Industries need water for manufacturing, processing, cooling, diluting, washing, or transporting the product. The used water from industries carries suspended or dissolved matter released during industrial processing [50][51][52]. The content and quality of industrial wastewater depend on the type of industry and its product [53]. The quantity of wastewater generated in many industries varies substantially from process to process and is substantially higher in developing countries [54].
The major pollution contributors are manufacturing industries like power generation, mining and construction, and food processing industries [8][43][55][56]. It may contain biodegradable [3][57], non-biodegradable [58][59], synthetic or heavy metal matter [60]. Developing countries are facing an extremely miserable situation where more than 90% of sewage waste and almost 70% of industrial raw wastes are becoming a part of the water bodies [61]. In developing countries, industrial waste disposal becomes more challenging because of the high production of wastes per unit area and the decrease in the proportion of land available for its disposal. Most industries dispose of raw effluent, which contains pathogens, heavy metals, soluble and insoluble salts, and organic and inorganic matter causing groundwater pollution [62][63][64]. Very few industries have adequate wastewater treatment facilities. As a result of this, freshwater becomes unfit for human use.
The wastewater composed of sewage; industrial, and agricultural waste is discharged globally in tens of millions of cubic meters per day. As a result, freshwater resources are polluted with fertilizers, pesticides, organic wastes, heavy metals, pathogens, agriculture waste, and emerging pollutants [55][65]. The acute poisoning of pesticides is causing morbidity and mortality, chiefly in developing countries (WWAP, 2018). The emerging pollutants are those, which have been recently identified as a danger to human health (UN, 2020). The emerging pollutants include chemicals and drugs used in modern lifestyles like cosmetic and personal care products, pharmaceuticals, hormones, endocrine disrupting chemicals, and pesticides [66][67][68].
According to reports, in developing countries untreated wastewater is discharged into rivers and water bodies, resulting in endangerment of aquatic life. The natural or synthetic pollutants, which are not commonly monitored in the environment, have the potential to invade the environment and cause a detrimental effect on human health and ecology. The European Aquatic Environment (EAE) has listed more than 700 emerging pollutants. Normal Network has categorized the emerging pollutants into more than 20 classes based on their origin. The major classes are pharmaceuticals, pesticides, disinfectants, and chemicals from various industries [69].
In developing countries, there were no studies regarding emerging pollutants due to a lack of awareness, funding, and infrastructure. As a result, the health risk associated with wastewater use is higher in developing countries. After 2005 and subsequently, research in this area was initiated, however, much more research and studies need to be conducted in developing countries [70][71]Table 2 shows various types of pollutants and their composition, released from industries and domestic sources.
Table 2. Industrial and domestic and their effluent composition [72].

4. Centralized and Decentralized Wastewater Treatment in Developing Countries

There are two approaches for wastewater treatment—centralized and decentralized. The centralized approach is a conventional one, where wastewater is treated at a central location and then distributed using a network of the pipeline network. The centralized system uses a combination of different processes and techniques like flocculation, coagulation, filtration, sedimentation, disinfection, etc. The techniques and processes ensure maximum removal of organic matter, pollutants, and pathogenic microbes. The major disadvantage of a centralized system is the need for huge investment in building the infrastructure and its maintenance. Decentralized wastewater treatment uses a range of simple technologies to treat wastewater from near or at the point of generation, for example, individual homes, colonies, institutes, or industries. Considering the problem of non-point source water pollution, decentralized wastewater treatment seems to be a logical and sustainable option. According to [80], a centralized wastewater treatment plant is more expensive than a decentralized one. The major differences between centralized and decentralized are shown in Table 3.
Table 3. Centralized vs. decentralized Source—[81].
Laugesen et al. (2010), have predicted that “despite the past failures of most centralized systems, it is likely that most new wastewater management systems in developing countries will continue to be advanced, centralized, and with a continued high probability for failure” [82]. UNESCO, and UN-Water (2017), have alarmed such countries about the risky investment in the centralized system due to inadequate finance and institutional capacity. As per USEPA research, decentralized wastewater management is more appropriate for developing countries due to its cost-effectiveness [80]. The lack of awareness, education, and research in such countries failed to select the appropriate approach for wastewater treatment. They also fail to consider the geographical conditions, human resources, cultural aspects, and finance.
In 2018, Zinn and his coworkers reviewed different technologies used for wastewater treatment in developing countries. They enlisted technologies, namely solar water disinfection (SODIS), chlorination, ceramic and bio-sand water filtration, and slow sand filtration. They compared the strength and weaknesses of these technologies, and also mentioned the pathogenic bacteria that the respective technology eliminates. They also found that SODIS is a more efficient technology than others, but hypothesized that in the future, membrane filtration will be preferred. The authors have also compared the effectiveness, advantages, and disadvantages of these technologies.
In India, the new wastewater treatment technology is a combination of electrocoagulation and electroflotation [83]. Electrocoagulation uses an electrical charge to change the surface charge of the particles due to which the particles become aggregated. In electro flotation, the suspended particles are removed by passing electricity through water generating hydrogen and oxygen [84]. In African countries, technologies like sludge deactivation, trickling filter, oxidation ditch, and aerated lagoons treat the wastewater [85][86]. China has come up with electron beam technology to treat industrial and medical wastewater. China has started the World’s largest wastewater treatment facility [87]. In Turkey, technologies like UV disinfection, sand filter, chlorination, rapid sand filter, disc filter, membrane bioreactor, activate carbon, ultrafiltration, ozone disinfection, and cartridge filters are used. Turkey is facing technical, social, and economical barriers to reusing wastewater [88].

References

  1. Choudhary, N.; Yadav, V.K.; Yadav, K.K.; Almohana, A.I.; Almojil, S.F.; Gnanamoorthy, G.; Kim, D.H.; Islam, S.; Kumar, P.; Jeon, B.H. Application of green synthesized MMT/Ag nanocomposite for removal of methylene blue from aqueous solution. Water 2021, 13, 3206.
  2. Rajendran, S.; Inwati, G.K.; Yadav, V.K.; Choudhary, N.; Solanki, M.B.; Abdellattif, M.H.; Yadav, K.K.; Gupta, N.; Islam, S.; Jeon, B.-H. Enriched catalytic activity of TiO2 nanoparticles supported by activated carbon for noxious pollutant elimination. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2808.
  3. Khan, S.H.; Pathak, B. Zinc oxide based photocatalytic degradation of persistent pesticides: A comprehensive review. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag. 2020, 13, 100290.
  4. Yadav, V.K.; Khan, S.H.; Choudhary, N.; Tirth, V.; Kumar, P.; Ravi, R.K.; Modi, S.; Khayal, A.; Shah, M.P.; Sharma, P.; et al. Nanobioremediation: A sustainable approach towards the degradation of sodium dodecyl sulfate in the environment and simulated conditions. J. Basic Microbiol. 2022, 62, 348–360.
  5. Fetimi, A.; Merouani, S.; Khan, M.S.; Asghar, M.N.; Yadav, K.K.; Jeon, B.-H.; Hamachi, M.; Kebiche-Senhadji, O.; Benguerba, Y. Modeling of Textile Dye Removal from Wastewater Using Innovative Oxidation Technologies (Fe(II)/Chlorine and H2O2/Periodate Processes): Artificial Neural Network-Particle Swarm Optimization Hybrid Model. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 13818–13825.
  6. Yadav, V.K.; Fulekar, M.H. Biogenic synthesis of maghemite nanoparticles (γ-Fe2O3) using Tridax leaf extract and its application for removal of fly ash heavy metals (Pb, Cd). Mater. Today Proc. 2018, 5, 20704–20710.
  7. Yadav, V.K.; Choudhary, N.; Ali, D.; Gnanamoorthy, G.; Inwati, G.K.; Almarzoug, M.H.; Kumar, G.; Khan, S.H.; Solanki, M.B. Experimental and computational approaches for the structural study of novel Ca-rich zeolites from incense stick ash and their application for wastewater treatment. Adsorpt. Sci. Technol. 2021, 2021, 6066906.
  8. Lito, P.F.; Aniceto, J.P.S.; Silva, C.M. Removal of anionic pollutants from waters and wastewaters and materials perspective for their selective sorption. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2012, 223, 6133–6155.
  9. Yadav, V.K.; Yadav, K.K.; Alam, J.; Cabral-Pinto, M.M.; Gnanamoorthy, G.; Alhoshan, M.; Kamyab, H.; Hamid, A.A.; Ali, F.A.A.; Shukla, A.K. Transformation of hazardous sacred incense sticks ash waste into less toxic product by sequential approach prior to their disposal into the water bodies. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 1–13.
  10. Patil, N.P.; Bholay, A.D.; Kapadnis, B.P.; Gaikwad, V.B. Biodegradation of model azo dye methyl red and other textile dyes by isolate bacillus circulans npp1. J. Pure Appl. Microbiol. 2016, 10, 2793–2800.
  11. Gnanamoorthy, G.; Karthikeyan, V.; Ali, D.; Kumar, G.; Yadav, V.K.; Narayanan, V. Global popularization of CuNiO2 and their rGO nanocomposite loveabled to the photocatalytic properties of methylene blue. Environ. Res. 2022, 204, 112338.
  12. Modi, S.; Yadav, V.K.; Gacem, A.; Ali, I.H.; Dave, D.; Khan, S.H.; Yadav, K.K.; Rather, S.-U.; Ahn, Y.; Son, C.T.; et al. Recent and emerging trends in remediation of methylene blue dye from wastewater by using zinc oxide nanoparticles. Water 2022, 14, 1749.
  13. Naik, M.R.; Mahanty, B.; Sahoo, S.K.; Jha, V.N.; Sahoo, N.K. Assessment of groundwater geochemistry using multivariate water quality index and potential health risk in industrial belt of central Odisha, India. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 303, 119161.
  14. Piaskowski, K.; Świderska-Dąbrowska, R.; Zarzycki, P.K. Dye removal from water and wastewater using various physical, chemical, and biological processes. J. AOAC Int. 2018, 101, 1371–1384.
  15. WWAP. The United Nations World Water Development Report 2018: Nature-Based Solutions for Water; UNESCO: Paris, France, 2018.
  16. Simha, P.; Ramanathan, A.; Thawani, B.; Jain, P.; Hussain, S.; Ganesapillai, M. Coal fly ash for the recovery of nitrogenous compounds from wastewater: Parametric considerations and system design. Arab. J. Chem. 2019, 12, 5049–5061.
  17. Khan, S.H.; Yadav, V.K. Advanced oxidation processes for wastewater remediation: An overview. In Removal of Emerging Contaminants through Microbial Processes; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 71–93.
  18. Mushtaq, F.; Zahid, M.; Bhatti, I.A.; Nasir, S.; Hussain, T. Possible applications of coal fly ash in wastewater treatment. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 240, 27–46.
  19. Yadav, V.K.; Khan, S.H.; Malik, P.; Thappa, A.; Suriyaprabha, R.; Ravi, R.K.; Choudhary, N.; Kalasariya, H.; Gnanamoorthy, G. Microbial synthesis of nanoparticles and their applications for wastewater treatment. In Microbial Biotechnology: Basic Research and Applications; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 147–187.
  20. Gupta, R.; Satyawali, Y.; Batra, V.S.; Balakrishnan, M. Submerged membrane bioreactor using fly ash filters: Trials with distillery wastewater. Water Sci. Technol. 2008, 58, 1281–1284.
  21. Rai, A.; Amari, A.; Yadav, V.K.; Ismail, M.A.; Elboughdiri, N.; Fulekar, M.H.; Basnet, A. A synergistic effect of moringa oleifera-based coagulant and ultrafiltration for the wastewater treatment collected from final ETP. Adsorpt. Sci. Technol. 2022, 2022, 1285011.
  22. Ghosh, D.; Ghorai, P.; Dutta, S. Chapter 4—Comparative analysis of water supply systems in megacities in developed and developing countries. In Current Directions in Water Scarcity Research; Srivastav, A.L., Madhav, S., Bhardwaj, A.K., Valsami-Jones, E., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; Volume 6, pp. 65–83.
  23. Yadav, V.K.; Choudhary, N.; Khan, S.H.; Malik, P.; Inwati, G.K.; Suriyaprabha, R.; Ravi, R.K. Synthesis and characterisation of nano-biosorbents and their applications for waste water treatment. In Handbook of Research on Emerging Developments and Environmental Impacts of Ecological Chemistry; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2020; pp. 252–290.
  24. Weiner, R.F.; Matthews, R.A. (Eds.) Chapter 11—Nonpoint source water pollution. In Environmental Engineering, 4th ed.; Butterworth-Heinemann: Burlington, VT, USA, 2003; pp. 233–249.
  25. Jamwal, P.; Mittal, A.K.; Mouchel, J.M. Point and non-point microbial source pollution: A case study of Delhi. Phys. Chem. Earth 2011, 36, 490–499.
  26. Liu, X. Online monitoring method of non-point source pollution of water resources in river scenic spots. Arab. J. Geosci. 2021, 14, 603.
  27. Rane, N.R.; Tapase, S.; Kanojia, A.; Watharkar, A.; Salama, E.S.; Jang, M.; Yadav, K.K.; Amin, M.A.; Cabral-Pinto, M.M.; Jadhav, J.P.; et al. Molecular insights into plant–microbe interactions for sustainable remediation of contaminated environment. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 344, 126246.
  28. León, L.F.; Soulis, E.D.; Kouwen, N.; Farquhar, G.J. Nonpoint source pollution: A distributed water quality modeling approach. Water Res. 2001, 35, 997–1007.
  29. Zwirzitz, B.; Wetzels, S.U.; Dixon, E.D. The sources and transmission routes of microbial populations throughout a meat processing facility. Npj Biofilms Microbiomes 2020, 6, 26.
  30. Singer, H.W. The technology gap and the developing countries. Int. J. Environ. Stud. 1972, 3, 119–123.
  31. Kuai, P.; Li, W.; Liu, N. Evaluating the effects of land use planning for non-point source pollution based on a system dynamics approach in China. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0135572.
  32. Mikhak, A.; Sohrabi, A.; Kassaee, M.Z.; Feizian, M.; Najafi Disfani, M. Removal of nitrate and phosphate from water by clinoptilolite-supported iron hydroxide nanoparticle. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2017, 42, 2433–2439.
  33. Hüesker, F.; Lepenies, R. Why does pesticide pollution in water persist? Environ. Sci. Policy 2022, 128, 185–193.
  34. Boulkhessaim, S.; Gacem, A.; Khan, S.H.; Amari, A.; Yadav, V.K.; Harharah, H.N.; Elkhaleefa, A.M.; Yadav, K.K.; Rather, S.-U.; Ahn, H.-J.; et al. Emerging trends in the remediation of persistent organic pollutants using nanomaterials and related processes: A review. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 2148.
  35. Sharma, B. Microbes as indicators of water quality and bioremediation of polluted waters: A novel approach. In Microbial Biotechnology in Environmental Monitoring and Cleanup; Pankaj, Sharma, A., Eds.; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2018; pp. 44–60.
  36. Huang, H.; Yu, Y.; Jing, L.; Wang, X.; Feng, J.; Niu, H.; Xiao, Q.; Wang, L. Semivolatile organic pollutants in water, suspended solids, and surface sediments of the Huaihe River, Jiangsu Section, People’s Republic of China. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2004, 73, 339–346.
  37. Bilotta, G.S.; Brazier, R.E. Understanding the influence of suspended solids on water quality and aquatic biota. Water Res. 2008, 42, 2849–2861.
  38. Wang, B.; Zhou, Y.; Li, L.; Xu, H.; Sun, Y.; Wang, Y. Novel synthesis of cyano-functionalized mesoporous silica nanospheres (MSN) from coal fly ash for removal of toxic metals from wastewater. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 345, 76–86.
  39. Yadav, V.K.; Yadav, K.K.; Gacem, A.; Gnanamoorthy, G.; Ali, I.H.; Khan, S.H.; Jeon, B.-H.; Kamyab, H.; Inwati, G.K.; Choudhary, N. A novel approach for the synthesis of vaterite and calcite from incense sticks ash waste and their potential for remediation of dyes from aqueous solution. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2022, 29, 100756.
  40. Yadav, V.K.; Ali, D.; Khan, S.H.; Gnanamoorthy, G.; Choudhary, N.; Yadav, K.K.; Thai, V.N.; Hussain, S.A.; Manhrdas, S. Synthesis and characterization of amorphous iron oxide nanoparticles by the sonochemical method and their application for the remediation of heavy metals from wastewater. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1551.
  41. Sharma, R.; Agrawal, P.R.; Kumar, R.; Gupta, G.; Ittishree. Chapter 4—Current scenario of heavy metal contamination in water. In Contamination of Water; Ahamad, A., Siddiqui, S.I., Singh, P., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2021; pp. 49–64.
  42. Rakib, M.J.; Rahman, A.; Onyena, A.P.; Kumar, R.; Sarker, A.; Hossain, M.B.; Islam, A.R.M.T.; Islam, S.; Rahman, M.; Jolly, Y.N.; et al. A comprehensive review of heavy metal pollution in the coastal areas of Bangladesh: Abundance, bioaccumulation, health implications, and challenges. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 1–27.
  43. Madhav, S.; Ahamad, A.; Singh, A.K.; Kushawaha, J.; Chauhan, J.S.; Sharma, S.; Singh, P. Water pollutants: Sources and impact on the environment and human health. In Sensors in Water Pollutants Monitoring: Role of Material; Pooja, D., Kumar, P., Singh, P., Patil, S., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 43–62.
  44. Yadav, V.K.; Pandita, P.R. Fly ash properties and their applications as a soil ameliorant. In Amelioration Technology for Soil Sustainability; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2019; pp. 59–89.
  45. Chang, H. Water and climate change. In International Encyclopedia of Geography: People, the Earth, Environment and Technology; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2019.
  46. Widyarani; Wulan, D.R.; Hamidah, U.; Komarulzaman, A.; Rosmalina, R.T.; Sintawardani, N. Domestic wastewater in Indonesia: Generation, characteristics and treatment. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 32397–32414.
  47. Zhang, L.; Peng, Y.; Yang, J. Transformation of dissolved organic matter during advanced coal liquefaction wastewater treatment and analysis of its molecular characteristics. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 658, 1334–1343.
  48. Gao, L.; Han, F.; Zhang, X.; Liu, B.; Fan, D.; Sun, X.; Zhang, Y.; Yan, L.; Wei, D. Simultaneous nitrate and dissolved organic matter removal from wastewater treatment plant effluent in a solid-phase denitrification biofilm reactor. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 314, 123714.
  49. Choi, Y.-Y.; Baek, S.-R.; Kim, J.-I.; Choi, J.-W.; Hur, J.; Lee, T.-U.; Park, C.-J.; Lee, B.J. Characteristics and biodegradability of wastewater organic matter in municipal wastewater treatment plants collecting domestic wastewater and industrial discharge. Water 2017, 9, 409.
  50. Yadav, V.K.; Gnanamoorthy, G.; Ali, D.; Bera, S.P.; Roy, A.; Kumar, G.; Choudhary, N.; Kalasariya, H.; Basnet, A. Cytotoxicity, removal of congo red dye in aqueous solution using synthesized amorphous iron oxide nanoparticles from incense sticks ash waste. J. Nanomater. 2022, 2022, 5949595.
  51. Yadav, V.K.; Inwati, G.K.; Ali, D.; Gnanamoorthy, G.; Bera, S.P.; Khan, S.H.; Choudhary, N.; Kumar, G.; Chaurasia, T.P.; Basnet, A. Remediation of azure a dye from aqueous solution by using surface-modified coal fly ash extracted ferrospheres by mineral acids and toxicity assessment. Adsorpt. Sci. Technol. 2022, 2022, 7012889.
  52. Dash, S.; Chaudhuri, H.; Gupta, R.; Nair, U.G. Adsorption study of modified coal fly ash with sulfonic acid as a potential adsorbent for the removal of toxic reactive dyes from aqueous solution: Kinetics and thermodynamics. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 5897–5905.
  53. Cisneros, B.J. Safe sanitation in low economic development areas. Treatise Water Sci. 2011, 4, 147–200.
  54. Ranade, V.V.; Bhandari, V.M. Industrial Wastewater Treatment, Recycling, and Reuse: An Overview; Elsevier Ltd.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014.
  55. Girard, J. Principles of Environmental Chemistry; Jones & Bartlett Publishers: Burlington, MA, USA, 2013.
  56. Adegoke, K.A.; Oyewole, R.O.; Lasisi, B.M.; Bello, O.S. Abatement of organic pollutants using fly ash based adsorbents. Water Sci. Technol. 2017, 76, 2580–2592.
  57. Titchou, F.E.; Zazou, H.; Afanga, H.; el Gaayda, J.; Akbour, R.A.; Hamdani, M. Removal of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) from water and wastewater by adsorption and electrocoagulation process. Groundw. Sustain. Dev. 2021, 13, 100575.
  58. Mrowiec, B. Plastic pollutants in water environment. Environ. Prot. Nat. Resour. 2017, 28, 51–55.
  59. Rawat, K. Organic pollutants in wastewater and its remediation approaches using graphene adsorbent. Int. J. Agric. Appl. Sci. 2021, 2, 8–13.
  60. Abdel-Raouf, M.S.; Abdul-Raheim, A.R.M. Removal of heavy metals from industrial waste water by biomass-based materials: A review. J. Pollut. Eff. Control 2016, 5, 1–13.
  61. Zorn, M. Natural disasters and less developed countries. In Nature, Tourism and Ethnicity as Drivers of (De)Marginalization: Insights to Marginality from Perspective of Sustainability and Development; Pelc, S., Koderman, M., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 59–78.
  62. Hakeem, K.R.; Akhtar, J.; Sabir, M. Soil Science: Agricultural and Environmental Prospectives; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; pp. 1–430.
  63. Inwati, G.K.; Kumar, P.; Roos, W.D.; Swart, H.C.; Singh, M. UV-irradiation effects on tuning LSPR of Cu/Ag nanoclusters in ion exchanged glass matrix and its thermodynamic behaviour. J. Alloy. Compd. 2020, 823, 153820.
  64. Kumar, P.; Inwati, G.K.; Mathpal, M.C.; Ghosh, S.; Roos, W.D.; Swart, H.C. Defects induced enhancement of antifungal activities of Zn doped CuO nanostructures. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 560, 150026.
  65. Malik, P.; Inwati, G.K.; Mukherjee, T.K.; Singh, S.; Singh, M. Green silver nanoparticle and Tween-20 modulated pro-oxidant to antioxidant curcumin transformation in aqueous CTAB stabilized peanut oil emulsions. J. Mol. Liq. 2019, 291, 111252.
  66. Arman, N.Z.; Salmiati, S.; Aris, A.; Salim, M.R.; Nazifa, T.H.; Muhamad, M.S.; Marpongahtun, M. A review on emerging pollutants in the water environment: Existences, health effects and treatment processes. Water 2021, 13, 3258.
  67. Montes-Grajales, D.; Fennix-Agudelo, M.; Miranda-Castro, W. Occurrence of personal care products as emerging chemicals of concern in water resources: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 595, 601–614.
  68. Daughton, C.G.; Ternes, T.A. Pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the environment: Agents of subtle change? Environ. Health Perspect. 1999, 107, 907–938.
  69. Geissen, V.; Mol, H.; Klumpp, E.; Umlauf, G.; Nadal, M.; van der Ploeg, M.; van de Zee, S.E.A.T.M.; Ritsema, C.J. Emerging pollutants in the environment: A challenge for water resource management. Int. Soil Water Conserv. Res. 2015, 3, 57–65.
  70. Chaukura, N.; Gwenzi, W.; Tavengwa, N.; Manyuchi, M.M. Biosorbents for the removal of synthetic organics and emerging pollutants: Opportunities and challenges for developing countries. Environ. Dev. 2016, 19, 84–89.
  71. Said, A.E.A.A.; Aly, A.A.; Abd El-Wahab, M.M.; Soliman, S.A.; Abd El-Hafez, A.A.; Helmey, V.; Goda, M.N. Application of modified bagasse as a biosorbent for reactive dyes removal from industrial wastewater. J. Water Resour. Prot. 2013, 5, 10.
  72. Khan, M.; Khan, A.U.; Hasan, M.A.; Yadav, K.K.; Pinto, M.M.C.; Malik, N.; Yadav, V.K.; Khan, A.H.; Islam, S.; Sharma, G.K. Agro-Nanotechnology as an Emerging Field: A Novel Sustainable Approach for Improving Plant Growth by Reducing Biotic Stress. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 2282.
  73. Irannajad, M.; Kamran Haghighi, H. Removal of heavy metals from polluted solutions by zeolitic adsorbents: A review. Environ. Process. 2021, 8, 7–35.
  74. Gaur, N.; Flora, G.; Yadav, M.; Tiwari, A. A review with recent advancements on bioremediation-based abolition of heavy metals. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts 2014, 16, 180–193.
  75. Modi, S.; Inwati, G.K.; Gacem, A.; Saquib Abullais, S.; Prajapati, R.; Yadav, V.K.; Syed, R.; Alqahtani, M.S.; Yadav, K.K.; Islam, S.; et al. Nanostructured Antibiotics and Their Emerging Medicinal Applications: An Overview of Nanoantibiotics. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 708.
  76. Rahman, L.; Wong, Z.; Sarjadi, M.; Soloi, S.; Arshad, S.; Bidin, K.; Musta, B. Heavy metals removal from electroplating wastewater by waste fiber-based poly(Amidoxime) ligand. Water 2021, 13, 1260.
  77. Su, H.; Lin, J.; Chen, H.; Wang, Q. Production of a novel slow-release coal fly ash microbial fertilizer for restoration of mine vegetation. Waste Manag. 2021, 124, 185–194.
  78. Cao, M.; Hu, A.; Gad, M.; Adyari, B.; Qin, D.; Zhang, L.; Sun, Q.; Yu, C.-P. Domestic wastewater causes nitrate pollution in an agricultural watershed, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 823, 153680.
  79. Bondi, C.A.M.; Marks, J.L.; Wroblewski, L.B.; Raatikainen, H.S.; Lenox, S.R.; Gebhardt, K.E. Human and environmental toxicity of sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS): Evidence for safe use in household cleaning products. Environ. Health Insights. 2015, 9, 27–32.
  80. Massoud, M.A.; Tarhini, A.; Nasr, J.A. Decentralized approaches to wastewater treatment and management: Applicability in developing countries. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90, 652–659.
  81. Gnanamoorthy, G.; Ramar, K.; Ali, D.; Yadav, V.K.; Jafar ahamed, A.; Kumar, G. Synthesis and effective performance of Photocatalytic and Antimicrobial activities of Bauhinia tomentosa Linn plants using of gold nanoparticles. Opt. Mater. 2022, 123, 111945.
  82. Laugesen, C.; Fryd, O. Sustainable wastewater management in developing countries. In American Society of Civil Engineers; ASCE Press: Reston, VA, USA, 2009.
  83. Kyzas, G.Z.; Matis, K.A. Electroflotation process: A review. J. Mol. Liq. 2016, 220, 657–664.
  84. Moussa, D.T.; El-Naas, M.H.; Nasser, M.; Al-Marri, M.J. A comprehensive review of electrocoagulation for water treatment: Potentials and challenges. J. Environ. Manag. 2017, 186, 24–41.
  85. Zyłka, R.; Dabrowski, W.; Gogina, E.; Yancen, O. Trickling filter for high efficiency treatment of dairy sewage. J. Ecol. Eng. 2018, 19, 269–275.
  86. Wang, Q.; Wei, W.; Gong, Y.; Yu, Q.; Li, Q.; Sun, J.; Yuan, Z. Technologies for reducing sludge production in wastewater treatment plants: State of the art. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 587–588, 510–521.
  87. Han, B.; Kyu Kim, J.; Kim, Y.; Seung Choi, J.; Young Jeong, K. Operation of industrial-scale electron beam wastewater treatment plant. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2012, 81, 1475–1478.
  88. Xiong, J.Q.; Cui, P.; Ru, S.; Kurade, M.B.; Patil, S.M.; Yadav, K.K.; Fallatah, A.M.; Cabral-Pinto, M.M.S.; Jeon, B.H. A comprehensive review on the effects of engineered nanoparticles on microalgal treatment of pollutants from wastewater. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 344, 131121.
More
Information
Subjects: Water Resources
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register : , , , , , , , , ,
View Times: 465
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 31 Aug 2022
1000/1000