Submitted Successfully!
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Ver. Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 Distribution characteristics of toxic metals (Cd, Cu, Pb, Cr, U, Th) in both surface water and sediments were investigated in this study. Concentrations of metals in water samples were lower than the recommended safe values. However, contents of radionucl + 1185 word(s) 1185 2020-01-13 10:12:27 |
2 layout Meta information modification 1185 2020-10-30 06:53:17 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?


Are you sure to Delete?
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Yi, L. Toxic Metals Contamination. Encyclopedia. Available online: (accessed on 08 December 2023).
Yi L. Toxic Metals Contamination. Encyclopedia. Available at: Accessed December 08, 2023.
Yi, Ling. "Toxic Metals Contamination" Encyclopedia, (accessed December 08, 2023).
Yi, L.(2020, January 15). Toxic Metals Contamination. In Encyclopedia.
Yi, Ling. "Toxic Metals Contamination." Encyclopedia. Web. 15 January, 2020.
Toxic Metals Contamination

Concentrations of potentially toxic metals including Cd, Cu, Pb, Cr, U, Th in surface water and sediment samples collected from a river were analyzed to assess the contaminations, distribution characteristics and sources of these metals. The contents of the metals were lower than the standard levels set by WHO for drinking water. However, U and Th contents were far beyond the background values of surface water. The concentrations of Cd, Cr and U in sediments were higher than the background values and the Probable Effect Level (PEL) of sediment quality guidelines (SQGs) which may result in high potential harmful biological effects to aquatic ecosystem. Based on the contamination factor (CF), geo-accumulation index (Igeo) and potential ecological risk index (RI), Cd, Cr and U were considered to be the metals that mainly contribute to the contamination of sediments. The calculation results also indicated that the sites adjacent to the uranium ore field were highly polluted. Results of cluster analysis, principal component analysis and correlation analysis revealed that Cr, Pb, U, Th were highly correlated with each other. These metals were mainly originated from both anthropogenic source and natural processes, especially emissions from uranium mining and quarrying, whereas Cd mostly came from anthropogenic source (agricultural activities) of the upper reaches of the river.

Potentially toxic metals Uranium mining Surface water Sediment Contamination indices Source identification

 1. Introduction

Heavy metals in aquatic environment have received considerable attention around the world owing to their wide availability, long incubation period, strong concealment and environmental toxicity [ 1 ] [ 2 ]. Heavy metal is a common term used in the literature on geochemistry and environmental pollution. However, it is argued that the term is not clearly defined and describes music rather than science. In present study, the term “potentially toxic metals” is applied instead of “heavy metals”  [ 3 ] [ 4 ]. As a result of intensive human activities and the expansion of industrial and agricultural production, large quantities of potentially toxic metals have been discharged into rivers around the world. Moreover, potentially toxic metal residues in contaminated rivers may accumulate in sediment, microorganisms, aquatic plants and animals. In addition, these metals can easily produce “secondary pollution” due to changes in sedimentary environment and pose great potential harm to biological and human health through food chain or other migration pathways [5]. As an important type of environmental pollutants, toxic metals can enter water bodies through various natural or anthropogenic pathways and occur in the water phases, sediments and organisms, and exhibit different environmental geochemical behaviors and biological toxic effects. Human activities, such as mining and disposal of waste water containing toxic metals and industrial metal chelates from tanneries, steel mills, etc., are the main sources of metals in water and sediments, which lead to a decline in water quality [ 6 ] [ 7 ] [ 8 ].

Most of the toxic metal pollutants are adsorbed by the suspended particles in water. These sorbed metals undergo complex migration and transformation processes in the water-sediment-organism, such as adsorption, desorption, precipitation, biological absorption and other reactions [ 9 ] [ 10 ]. Metal ions in water not only can generate hydroxides by hydrolysis, but also react with inorganic ions to form sulfide, carbonate and phosphate complexes. Due to the low solubility, persistence and subsequent accumulation, these metals and their complexes are easy to precipitate in sediments. Thus, sediments frequently act as the sinks of metal pollutants. However, when physico-chemical conditions of sediment-water interface change subjecting to biological action, disturbance or hydrodynamic scour, potentially toxic metal pollutants are released from the sediments into the water bodies. Studies have shown that sediment could act as an indicator for water pollution, the history and intensity of anthropogenic metal pollution and ecological changes [ 11 ]. Thus, the sediments played an important role in controlling the pollution sources [ 12 ] [ 13 ] [ 14 ]. Therefore, an evaluation of toxic metal pollution in river sediment is of great value for a study of river ecological environment, as well as prevention and control of river pollution.

Due to the poorly designed facilities, uranium mining activities, like open-pit mining, in situ leaching and heap leaching, have resulted in a considerable accumulation of toxic metals and radionuclides in environmental medium [ 15 ]. Under the action of precipitation infiltration, weathering and leakage, the tailing slags easily diffuse and migrate to the surrounding environment [ 16 ]. Finally, they enter the surrounding rivers via infiltration and surface runoff leading to serious contamination to water bodies and the associated ecosystems. In recent years, significant pollutions caused by potentially toxic elements (e.g. Pb, Cd, Cu, Zn, Hg, As) and radionuclides (e.g. U, Th, Ra, e.g.) in mining ecosystems have been widely reported [ 17 ] [ 18 ] [ 19 ] [ 20 ]. Radionuclides pollution and toxic metals loading in shallow tailings, discharge water, surface water, groundwater and paddy soil around the study uranium mining area were found and recognized [ 21 ] [ 22 ] [ 23 ]. However, there is a lack of research focusing on the concentrations and distributions of radionuclides and potentially toxic metals in surface water and sediments, especially in the river downstream the uranium mining. The distributions of radionuclides and potentially toxic metals are worth to quantitative study. Therefore, the objectives of present study are to: (i) investigate the distribution and levels of potentially toxic metals in water and sediments; (ii) explore the pollution status and ecological risk levels of potentially toxic metals in sediments; (iii) determine the source apportionment of potentially toxic metals in study area.

2. Distribution Characteristics of Toxic Metals

Distribution characteristics of toxic metals (Cd, Cu, Pb, Cr, U, Th) in both surface water and sediments were investigated in this study. Concentrations of metals in water samples were lower than the recommended safe values. However, contents of radionuclides (U and Th) were much higher than the background values of surface water radionuclides in Jiangxi province. The maximum concentrations of most metals (except Cr, Cd and Pb) were observed at the site H3, downstream of the uranium mine. It showed that the concentration of potentially toxic metals in surface water might be affected by uranium mining activities.

High concentration levels of metals were found at H3 site adjacent to the uranium ore, indicating that there might have been potentially toxic metal emissions from the uranium mine. Concentrations of Cu, Pb, Th were lower than the background values, while Cd, Cr and U contents were higher than the background values. According to the sediment quality guidelines (SQGs) of USEPA, the Cr contents above PEL might pose high potential harmful biological effects to aquatic ecosystem. The analyzed contamination factor (CF), geo-accumulation index (Igeo) and potential ecological risk index (RI) revealed that Cd, Cr and U metals mainly contributed to the contamination and ecological risk of sediments along the studied river. Moreover, among the six sampling sites, the sediments taken from surroundings of uranium ore field were highly polluted. Results of CA, PCA and correlation analysis suggested that Cr, Pb, U and Th were highly correlated and originated from both anthropogenic source and natural processes, especially emissions from uranium mining and quarrying. Cd was mainly generated by anthropogenic source of agricultural activities.

Although all the metals for water are quite low, the river sediments were highly contaminated with metals (Cd, Cr and U) and the contamination is mainly correlated to the agricultural activities and uranium mining activities. These metals can be easily to released again into the water body through water flow, biological disturbance and chemical reaction, forming "secondary pollution". Hence, it is necessary to implement ecological risk and environmental monitoring of river sediments downstream the uranium deposits to ensure the downstream ecosystem safety of the uranium mine, as well as strengthening regional agricultural pollution prevention and control.


  1. Naglaa F. Soliman; Alaa M. Younis; Eman M. El Kady; An insight into fractionation, toxicity, mobility and source apportionment of metals in sediments from El Temsah Lake, Suez Canal. Chemosphere 2019, 222, 165-174, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.01.009.
  2. Kangjie Yang; Longji Zhu; Yue Zhao; Zimin Wei; Xiaomeng Chen; Changhao Yao; Qingqing Meng; Ran Zhao; A novel method for removing heavy metals from composting system: The combination of functional bacteria and adsorbent materials. Bioresource Technology 2019, 293, 122095, 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122095.
  3. Olivier Pourret; Andrew Hursthouse; It’s Time to Replace the Term “Heavy Metals” with “Potentially Toxic Elements” When Reporting Environmental Research. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2019, 16, 4446, 10.3390/ijerph16224446.
  4. Olivier Pourret; Jean-Claude Bollinger; Eric D. Van Hullebusch; On the difficulties of being rigorous in environmental geochemistry studies: some recommendations for designing an impactful paper. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2019, (, 1-9, 10.1007/s11356-019-06835-y.
  5. Umesh Kumar Singh; Balwant Kumar; Pathways of heavy metals contamination and associated human health risk in Ajay River basin, India. Chemosphere 2017, 174, 183-199, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.01.103.
  6. Si-Yu Zeng; Xin Dong; Ji-Ning Chen; Toxicity assessment of metals in sediment from the lower reaches of the Haihe River Basin in China. International Journal of Sediment Research 2013, 28, 172-181, 10.1016/s1001-6279(13)60029-3.
  7. Mohamed E. Mahmoud; Gehan M. Nabil; Mohamed M. Zaki; Mohamed M. Saleh; Starch functionalization of iron oxide by-product from steel industry as a sustainable low cost nanocomposite for removal of divalent toxic metal ions from water.. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 2019, 137, 455-468, 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.06.170.
  8. E. Zinabu; P. Kelderman; J. Van Der Kwast; K. Irvine; Correction to: Impacts and Policy Implications of Metals Effluent Discharge into Rivers within Industrial Zones: A Sub-Saharan Perspective from Ethiopia.. Environmental Management 2018, 61, 716-718, 10.1007/s00267-017-0986-1.
  9. Tao Li; Guihua Sun; Chupeng Yang; Kai Liang; Shengzhong Ma; Lei Huang; Weidong Luo; Source apportionment and source-to-sink transport of major and trace elements in coastal sediments: Combining positive matrix factorization and sediment trend analysis. Science of The Total Environment 2019, 651, 344-356, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.198.
  10. Garam Lee; Zhaxi Suonan; Seung Hyeon Kim; Dong-Woon Hwang; Kun-Seop Lee; Heavy metal accumulation and phytoremediation potential by transplants of the seagrass Zostera marina in the polluted bay systems. Marine Pollution Bulletin 2019, 149, 110509, 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.110509.
  11. Roozbeh Mirza; Mazaher Moeinaddini; Shrareh Pourebrahim; Mohammad Ali Zahed; Contamination, ecological risk and source identification of metals by multivariate analysis in surface sediments of the khouran Straits, the Persian Gulf. Marine Pollution Bulletin 2019, 145, 526-535, 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.06.028.
  12. Wei He; Ze-Lin Bai; Wen-Xiu Liu; Xiang-Zhen Kong; Bin Yang; Chen Yang; Sven Erik Jørgensen; Fu-Liu Xu; Occurrence, spatial distribution, sources, and risks of polychlorinated biphenyls and heavy metals in surface sediments from a large eutrophic Chinese lake (Lake Chaohu). Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2016, 23, 10335-10348, 10.1007/s11356-015-6001-6.
  13. Jingwen Tang; Liyuan Chai; Huan Li; Zhihui Yang; Weichun Yang; A 10-Year Statistical Analysis of Heavy Metals in River and Sediment in Hengyang Segment, Xiangjiang River Basin, China. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1057, 10.3390/su10041057.
  14. Memet Varol; Bulent Sen; Assessment of nutrient and heavy metal contamination in surface water and sediments of the upper Tigris River, Turkey. CATENA 2012, 92, 1-10, 10.1016/j.catena.2011.11.011.
  15. Mengtuan Ge; Dengjun Wang; Junwei Yang; Qiang Jin; Zongyuan Chen; Wangsuo Wu; Zhijun Guo; Co-transport of U(VI) and akaganéite colloids in water-saturated porous media: Role of U(VI) concentration, pH and ionic strength. Water Research 2018, 147, 350-361, 10.1016/j.watres.2018.10.004.
  16. B.G. Lottermoser; P.M. Ashley; Tailings dam seepage at the rehabilitated Mary Kathleen uranium mine, Australia. Journal of Geochemical Exploration 2005, 85, 119-137, 10.1016/j.gexplo.2005.01.001.
  17. Na Wang; Jichang Han; Yang Wei; Gang Li; Yingying Sun; Potential Ecological Risk and Health Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals and Metalloid in Soil around Xunyang Mining Areas. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4828, 10.3390/su11184828.
  18. Wagner De Souza Pereira; Alphonse Germaine Albert Charles Kelecom; Ademir Xavier Da Silva; Alessander Sá Do Carmo; Delcy De Azavedo Py Júnior; Assessment of uranium release to the environment from a disabled uranium mine in Brazil. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 2018, 188, 18-22, 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2017.11.012.
  19. Eugène Pascal Binam Mandeng; Louise Marie Bondjè Bidjeck; Armel Zacharie Ekoa Bessa; Yvan Demonstel Ntomb; Jacques Wassouo Wadjou; Elvine Paternie Edjengte Doumo; Lucien Bitom Dieudonné; Contamination and risk assessment of heavy metals, and uranium of sediments in two watersheds in Abiete-Toko gold district, Southern Cameroon. Heliyon 2019, 5, e02591, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02591.
  20. Zhenghai Wang; Haoyang Qin; Xinyun Liu; Health risk assessment of heavy metals in the soil-water-rice system around the Xiazhuang uranium mine, China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2019, 26, 5904-5912, 10.1007/s11356-018-3955-1.
  21. Yao, G.Y.; Hua, E.X.; Gao, B.; Wang, Y.; Zhan, L.Z.; Jiang, J.Q.; Distribution characteristics of radionuclides in soils around tailings dump sites of a uranium mining field in south China. Ecol. Rural Environ 2015, 31, 963-966, 10.11934/j.issn.1673-4831.2015.06.025.
  22. Long Xiang; Ping-Hui Liu; Xing-Fu Jiang; Pei-Jia Chen; Health risk assessment and spatial distribution characteristics of heavy metal pollution in rice samples from a surrounding hydrometallurgy plant area in No. 721 uranium mining, East China. Journal of Geochemical Exploration 2019, 207, 106360, 10.1016/j.gexplo.2019.106360.
  23. Liu He; Bai Gao; Xin Luo; Jimmy Jiao; Huanhuan Qin; Chunyan Zhang; Yihui Dong; Health Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Surface Water near a Uranium Tailing Pond in Jiangxi Province, South China. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1113, 10.3390/su10041113.
Contributor MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to :
View Times: 920
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 30 Oct 2020