Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 -- 1215 2022-05-18 02:47:58 |
2 format correction Meta information modification 1215 2022-05-18 03:18:00 | |
3 format correction -2 word(s) 1213 2022-05-19 04:25:38 | |
4 rearranged reference + 3 word(s) 1216 2022-05-20 09:46:32 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Simiyu, D.; Lee, O.R.; Jang, J.H. Genetic Engineering for Cannabis sativa L.. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/23029 (accessed on 14 June 2024).
Simiyu D, Lee OR, Jang JH. Genetic Engineering for Cannabis sativa L.. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/23029. Accessed June 14, 2024.
Simiyu, David, Ok Ran Lee, Jin Hoon Jang. "Genetic Engineering for Cannabis sativa L." Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/23029 (accessed June 14, 2024).
Simiyu, D., Lee, O.R., & Jang, J.H. (2022, May 18). Genetic Engineering for Cannabis sativa L.. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/23029
Simiyu, David, et al. "Genetic Engineering for Cannabis sativa L.." Encyclopedia. Web. 18 May, 2022.
Genetic Engineering for Cannabis sativa L.
Edit

Cannabis sativa L. (Cannabis, hemp or marijuana) is an erect annual herb of the Cannabiceae family. Cannabis is considered to be monotypic (occurs as a single species), but arguments for its polytypic nature also exist.

Cannabis sativa hemp haploid induction

1. Genome Modification/Editing Studies in Cannabis

Genetic engineering is a method that has been widely used to improve traits and to obtain new cultivars with desirable characteristics. To achieve this, breeders can use conventional breeding, genetic modification or genome-editing methods[1]. Genetic modification entails the transfer of genetic materials from one species to another (transgenic) or within the same species (cisgenic), whereas in genome editing a specific part of a gene can be edited using sequence-specific nucleases such as zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription-activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs) and regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat-associated endonucleases (CRISPR/Cas)[1]. The use of CRISPR/Cas allows breeders to edit a gene sequence using an enzyme and a small guide RNA which can be removed afterwards, making the edited lines free of foreign genetic materials [2]. The molecular tools needed to achieve genome modification or editing can be delivered into the cell system by various methods, including Agrobacterium-, nanoparticle- and polyethylene glycol (PEG)-mediated transformation. In Cannabis, the aforementioned methods have been used in gene modification studies [3]; however, regeneration of the transgenic plants has remained a major challenge. For example, Cannabis callus was successfully transformed using Agrobacterium tumefaciens (strain EHA101) carrying a gene encoding phosphomannose isomerase, but regeneration of the transformed calli was not achieved [3]. In another study, Agrobacterium rhizogenes transformation of hemp hypocotyls resulted in transgenic hairy roots, with no report of regeneration of the transformed tissues [4]. A lack of replicable and reliable Cannabis regeneration protocols prompted more studies on transient gene transformation for studying gene functions. Virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) was used for reverse genetic studies in hemp seedling and leaf to produce transient transformants [5]. An agroinfiltration protocol (using A. tumefaciens strain EHA105) coupled with vacuum infiltration resulted in successful transient transformation of cotyledons and true leaves of young Cannabis seedlings [6]. A more efficient transformation of mature leaves, flowers, stem and root tissues using similar methods of agroinfiltration concluded that A. tumefaciens strain GV3101 is 1.7 times more efficient than strains EHA105 and LBA4404 [7]. Additionally, the transient transformation of Cannabis protoplast using PEG-mediated transformation was also recently reported to be effective in studying gene functions [8]. In another study, a nanoparticle-mediated transformation was successful in delivering soybean genes into Cannabis leaf tissues using silicon-dioxide-coated gold nanoparticles [9]. Together, these studies provided important protocols for Cannabis transient transformation that do not require going through the indirect organogenesis procedures that have been a bottleneck in genetic engineering studies. Although transient transformation can be effectively applied to study gene function in Cannabis, establishment of stable transformation is still required for genetic analysis of the progeny. A recent study reported a protocol for stable Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Cannabis hypocotyls and cotyledons  [10]. The study concluded that the rate of transformation and regeneration was higher in hypocotyl explants, but it varied among different Cannabis varieties. However, transformed explants were directly regenerated without going through the callus phase. In another study, a successful stable transformation using immature embryos followed by indirect organogenesis of their calli was reported  [11]. To enhance the indirect regeneration potential, Agrobacterium-mediated transformation was used to overexpress endogenous developmental regulator genes which are known to have positive influences on shoot organogenesis. Moreover, the same study used CRISPR/Cas9 for the first time in Cannabis to edit the phytoene desaturase gene, resulting in gene-edited seedlings. Development of homozygous inbred lines of a crop with a desired trait is a tedious process that can take up to 10 generations by traditional methods [12]. Shortening of this breeding time is crucial for both scientific and commercial ends in crops such as Cannabis which have high commercial value. Doubled haploid (DH) technology can be employed for this purpose, as it has been used successfully in other crops. However, DH technology in Cannabis is yet to be fully developed.

2. Doubled Haploid

Doubled haploids (DH) are plants that carry genetic information from a single parent [13]. DH technology is used by plant breeders to rapidly make genetically homogeneous progenies in fewer generations than it takes in the traditional breeding. This technology has been used extensively in maize and other crops such as wheat, potato and sorghum [14]. To make haploid plants, breeders can use in vitro haploid gametophyte tissue culture, interspecific crossing or pollen irradiation procedures [13]. Once haploid plants are obtained, their chromosomes are doubled to make them fertile and robust by chemically blocking cell division without blocking chromosome duplication [13]. In Cannabis, interspecific crossing and pollen irradiation studies to make haploid plants have not been carried out, but studies to regenerate haploid plants directly by embryogenesis from microspores (androgenesis) have been conducted. In one study, a small percent (0.05-0.5%) of in vitro cultured hemp microspores formed embryo [2]. A study on two hemp varieties reported that cold-shock pretreatment of floral buds before in vitro culture increased the embryogenesis potential of the microspores [15]. The rate of embryo formation in the study (1.11 embryo formation for every 100 anthers), was also low and the microspore-derived embryo did not develop beyond 9 weeks. It has been reported that for successful embryogenesis, microspores have to be at, or just after, the first mitotic division when the cells are still in a uni-nucleate or early bi-nucleate stage [2]. Microspore culture at an appropriate developmental stage is therefore crucial but challenging. One other method to make haploid plants is the use of in planta gene-mediated haploid induction systems. This method entails crossing a line carrying the desired genetic information with a haploid inducer (HI) line [14]. In this crossing, the chromosomes from the HI will not be part of the embryo’s genome after fertilization. This haploid induction method has been used in plants such as Zea mays, where a HI carrying a MATRILINEAL (MTL)/Patatin-Like Phopholipase A1 (ZmPLA1)/NOT LIKE DAD (NLD) gene was used in a cross that resulted in haploid offspring [16]. Additionally, a mutation in the Centromere histone H3 (CENH3) gene has been reported to cause haploid induction in desired plants when these plants are crossed with an HI carrying this mutation  [17][18]. Other genes that have been reported to have haploid induction ability are DOMAIN OF UNKNOWN FUNCTION 679 membrane protein (DMP) [19] and indeterminate gametophyte1 (ig1)/LATERAL ORGAN BOUNDARIES (LOB)-domain protein [20]. The molecular basis behind haploid-inducing ability of maize HI has been discovered [14][16]. This has allowed breeders to render haploid induction ability to plant lines through genetic engineering [18][19][21]. Although the use of HI has not yet been implemented in Cannabis, success in other plants indicate that this method can be used for haploid induction and DH studies. Once well established in Cannabis, DH technology can be useful in fixing desired characteristics and in reducing breeding generations required to obtain a desirable line. Being a plant with high variability in chemical and physical characteristics, as well as high commercial value, DH offers a promising way forward for Cannabis breeding. Moreover, researchers have made use of HI to deliver gene-editing tools into the egg cell of a plant through the methods called HI-Edit [22], and haploid-inducer-mediated genome editing (IMGE) [23]. These methods can also be used in gene editing procedures of Cannabis once well established. The fact that the HI genome, and the gene-editing machinery it carries, do not become part of the transformed embryo makes this technology appealing for commercial utilization of the engineered plants.

References

  1. McPartland, J.M. Cannabis Systematics at the Levels of Family, Genus, and Species. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2018, 3, 203–212.
  2. Hillig, K.W. Genetic evidence for speciation in Cannabis (Cannabaceae). Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2005, 52, 161–180.
  3. McPartland, J.M.; Hegman, W.; Long, T. Cannabis in Asia: Its center of origin and early cultivation, based on a synthesis of subfossil pollen and archaeobotanical studies. Veg. Hist. Archaeobotany 2019, 28, 691–702.
  4. Ren, G.; Zhang, X.; Li, Y.; Ridout, K.; Serrano-Serrano, M.L.; Yang, Y.; Liu, A.; Ravikanth, G.; Nawaz, M.A.; Mumtaz, A.S.; et al. Large-scale whole-genome resequencing unravels the domestication history of Cannabis sativa. Sci. Adv. 2021, 7, eabg2286.
  5. Deitch, R. Hemp-American History Revisited: The Plant with a Divided History; Algora Publishing: New York, NY, USA, 2003.
  6. Schultes, R.E.; Hofmann, A.; Ratsch, C. Plants of the Gods-Their Sacred, Healing and Hallucinogenic Powers; Healing Arts Press: Rochester, VT, USA, 2001.
  7. Seddon, T.; Floodgate, W. Regulating Cannabis: A Global Review and Future Directions; Palgrave Macmillan: Cham, Switzerland, 2020.
  8. Gülck, T.; Booth, J.K.; Carvalho, A.; Khakimov, B.; Crocoll, C.; Motawia, M.S.; Møller, B.L.; Bohlmann, J.; Gallage, N.J. Synthetic Biology of Cannabinoids and Cannabinoid Glucosides in Nicotiana benthamiana and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Nat. Prod. 2020, 83, 2877–2893.
  9. Adhikary, D.; Kulkarni, M.; El-Mezawy, A.; Mobini, S.; Elhiti, M.; Gjuric, R.; Ray, A.; Polowick, P.; Slaski, J.J.; Jones, M.P.; et al. Medical Cannabis and Industrial Hemp Tissue Culture: Present Status and Future Potential. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 627240.
  10. Galán-Ávila, A.; Gramazio, P.; Ron, M.; Prohens, J.; Herraiz, F.J. A novel and rapid method for Agrobacterium-mediated production of stably transformed Cannabis sativa L. plants. Ind. Crops Prod. 2021, 170, 113691.
  11. Zhang, X.; Xu, G.; Cheng, C.; Lei, L.; Sun, J.; Xu, Y.; Deng, C.; Dai, Z.; Yang, Z.; Chen, X.; et al. Establishment of an Agrobacterium -mediated genetic transformation and CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.). Plant Biotechnol. J. 2021, 19, 1979–1987.
  12. Small, E.; Cronquist, A. A Practical and Natural Taxonomy for Cannabis. TAXON 1976, 25, 405–435.
  13. McPartland, J.M.; Guy, G.W. A question of rank: Using DNA barcodes to classify Cannabis sativa and Cannabis indica. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Cannabinoid Research Society Symposium on the Cannabinoids, Baveno, Italy, 28 June–3 July 2004.
  14. Oh, H.; Seo, B.; Lee, S.; Ahn, D.-H.; Jo, E.; Park, J.-K.; Min, G.-S. Two complete chloroplast genome sequences of Cannabis sativa varieties. Mitochondrial DNA Part A 2015, 27, 2835–2837.
  15. Kress, W.J.; Erickson, D.L. A Two-Locus Global DNA Barcode for Land Plants: The Coding rbcL Gene Complements the Non-Coding trnH-psbA Spacer Region. PLoS ONE 2007, 6, e508.
  16. Gilmore, S.; Peakall, R.; Robertson, J. Organelle DNA haplotypes reflect crop-use characteristics and geographic origins of Cannabis sativa. Forensic Sci. Int. 2007, 172, 179–190.
  17. Lawrence, R.G. Pot in Pans: A History of Eating Cannabis; The Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group: London, UK, 2019.
  18. Hillig, K.W.; Mahlberg, P.G. A chemotaxonomic analysis of cannabinoid variation in Cannabis (Cannabaceae). Am. J. Bot. 2004, 91, 966–975.
  19. Anderson, C.L. Leaf variation among Cannabis species from a controlled garden. Botanical Museum Leaflets 1980, 28, 61–69.
  20. Cascini, F.; Farcomeni, A.; Migliorini, D.; Baldassarri, L.; Boschi, I.; Martello, S.; Amaducci, S.; Lucini, L.; Bernardi, J. Highly Predictive Genetic Markers Distinguish Drug-Type from Fiber-Type Cannabis sativa L. Plants 2019, 8, 496.
  21. Fischedick, J.T.; Hazekamp, A.; Erkelens, T.; Choi, Y.H.; Verpoorte, R. Metabolic fingerprinting of Cannabis sativa L., cannabinoids and terpenoids for chemotaxonomic and drug standardization purposes. Phytochemistry 2010, 71, 2058–2073.
  22. Watts, S.; McElroy, M.; Migicovsky, Z.; Maassen, H.; van Velzen, R.; Myles, S. Cannabis labelling is associated with genetic variation in terpene synthase genes. Nat. Plants 2021, 7, 1330–1334.
  23. Grassi, G.; McPartland, J.M. Chemical and morphological phenotypes in breeding of Cannabis sativa L. In Cannabis sativa L. Botany and Biotechnology; Chandra, S., Lata, H., ElSohly, M., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017.
More
Information
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register : , ,
View Times: 719
Revisions: 4 times (View History)
Update Date: 20 May 2022
1000/1000
Video Production Service