Submitted Successfully!
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Ver. Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 -- 1141 2022-04-08 14:50:08 |
2 Adjust the reference format -17 word(s) 1124 2022-04-11 04:22:07 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?


Are you sure to Delete?
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Szelenyi, G.; Kurdi, R.; Nemestothy, N.; Belafi-Bako, K.; Bakonyi, P. Bio-Electrochemical Systems in Dark Fermentative Hydrogen Effluents Treatment. Encyclopedia. Available online: (accessed on 30 November 2023).
Szelenyi G, Kurdi R, Nemestothy N, Belafi-Bako K, Bakonyi P. Bio-Electrochemical Systems in Dark Fermentative Hydrogen Effluents Treatment. Encyclopedia. Available at: Accessed November 30, 2023.
Szelenyi, Gabor, Robert Kurdi, Nandor Nemestothy, Katalin Belafi-Bako, Peter Bakonyi. "Bio-Electrochemical Systems in Dark Fermentative Hydrogen Effluents Treatment" Encyclopedia, (accessed November 30, 2023).
Szelenyi, G., Kurdi, R., Nemestothy, N., Belafi-Bako, K., & Bakonyi, P.(2022, April 08). Bio-Electrochemical Systems in Dark Fermentative Hydrogen Effluents Treatment. In Encyclopedia.
Szelenyi, Gabor, et al. "Bio-Electrochemical Systems in Dark Fermentative Hydrogen Effluents Treatment." Encyclopedia. Web. 08 April, 2022.
Bio-Electrochemical Systems in Dark Fermentative Hydrogen Effluents Treatment

Bio-electrochemical systems have the potential to improve the quality of anaerobic effluents. As for dark fermentation, microbial fuel cells, as a class of bio-electrochemical systems, could provide a sufficient platform to valorize the organic matter found in the H2 production effluent. Such valorization may be implemented either by microbial fuel cells to produce electricity, or by microbial electrolysis cells to produce additional hydrogen gas. 

Dark fermentation Bio-Electrochemical Systems Anaerobic digestion Membrane bioreactor Effluent treatment Bio-hydrogen production

1. Introduction

Dark fermentation has been at the forefront of renewable energy research due to its capacity to convert organics into a gas mixture with significant H2 content. However, the fermentation effluents contain compounds such as volatile fatty acids (VFAs) and hence need proper treatment. The fact that hydrogen fermentation effluents are rich in such substances makes them suitable feedstocks for microbial electrochemical technologies driven by the underlying electro-active bacteria or their consortia. Actually, bio-electrochemical systems, such as microbial fuel cells and microbial electrolysis cells, have been widely used to generate either electricity or hydrogen gas as products from particular hydrogen fermentation effluents [1][2][3].

The treatment and potential re-use of anaerobic effluents became a bottleneck in the rapidly growing biogas and bio-hydrogen industry. 

2. Bio-Electrochemical Systems (BES) for the Treatment of Dark Fermentative Hydrogen Production Effluents

The conversion efficiency of various biological systems can be enhanced if assisted by integrated bio-electrochemical systems. This effect is due to:
  • Simultaneous occurrence of different (and usually subsequent) phases of the redox processes in electrically linked distant spaces of the reactor, which, in practice, behaves as an additional stirring,
  • Leveraging effect of the additional electric potential on the biochemical processes; this allows complementary endotherm reactions that would not occur in the absence of external potential,
  • A supplementary selection advantage of electro-active microbial strains that increases the variety of organic compounds to biodegrade

2.1. BES Configurations

Both microbial fuel cells (MFC) and microbial electrolysis cells (MEC) break down organic compounds by removing hydrogen from molecules. The exo-electrogenic microorganisms transfer the removed electrons to a positively charged anode, while the corresponding protons are ejected to the medium. These protons migrate to the cathode through a cation exchange membrane, while the electrons do the same through an external circuit. The difference is that, in an MFC, the protons and electrons recombine with oxygen, where the redox reaction supplies the necessary energy. Meanwhile, in the MEC, they recombine with each other, the necessary energy being supplied by external electric power. The two systems are compared in Figure 1 and Figure 2.
Figure 1. MFC.
Figure 2. MEC.
The composition of the dark fermentation effluent (the concentration and relative ratio of VFAs) can vary depending on the actual hydrogen fermentation conditions [4] and, thus, it can take an effect on the achievable electron recovery efficiency and electrochemical performance of microbial fuel cells [5]. Apart from the VFAs (acetic acid, propionic acid, and butyric acid), the hydrogen fermentation effluent may contain lactate, valeric acid, capronic acid, ethanol, etc. [6]. Although VFAs are generally favored substances for electro-active strains, the type of VFA (e.g., acetic acid vs. butyric acid) can notably determine the microbial fuel cell performance [7].
From a taxonomic viewpoint, to increase MFC performance, species belonging to the genus Geobacter should be promoted in the anodic biofilm keeping in mind that the corresponding species may reflect distinct metabolic versatilities and hence affect system behavior [8]. In this aspect, when the feed of MFCs contains complex organic matter that electro-active microorganisms might be insufficient to deal with directly, rate limitations may arise from the preliminary hydrolysis/conversion steps [9]. For cases when MFCs meet complex feedstocks, mixed-source inocula could be viable to select and adapt the required (synergistic) microbes; defined co-cultures accommodating task-specific bacteria seem to be applicable as well. As for co-culture deployment in MFCs, Ren et al. [10] provided evidence for the feasibility of electricity generation in line with cellulose degradation using Clostridium cellulolyticum and Geobacter sulfurreducens. In another work [11], the constructed co-culture of Shewanella oneidensis and Klebsiella pneumonae was applied with success to convert glycerol into electricity in MFCs.

2.2. BES in Complex Systems

In addition to the engineering and design of effective exo-electrogenic communities in MFCs, pre-treatments can be considered for enhancing the degradation of complex materials. A pre-treatment may include fermentation or digestion, as shown, for instance, in the research of Chookaew et al. [12] and Kannaiah Goud and Venkata Mohan [13] on glycerol (the by-product of biodiesel production) and food waste, respectively. Chandrasekhar and Ahn [14] also proposed the pre-fermentation of piggery wastewater in order to increase the concentration of VFAs in the subsequent feed of MFCs. For high-organic-strength wastes, e.g., food waste, dilution with other, less-concentrated wastewaters could also be a practical approach to maintain proper MFC operation [15]. The scheme of this system can be drafted as oi Figure 3.
Figure 3. Pre-treatment of slurry in a biogas digester.
Though MFCs could have the potential to process wastes of the food industry e.g., cheese whey [16], treatments prior to the bio-electrochemical systems may further improve their working efficiency on such substrates [17][18]. A cornerstone of wastewater e.g., fermentation effluent management in MFCs, is the electrical conductivity of the solution, which is often low and may reduce the power density. To resolve this issue, salts might be added; however, some constraints can be faced by up-scaling the process and the tolerance of electro-active species to higher ion concentrations is a factor to be taken into account as well [19]. It is important to mention that MFCs, as pollutant treatment units of anaerobic effluents, can find a niche not only for organic matter degradation, but also for ammonia removal [20].
The performance of a wide range of bioprocesses can be largely improved if hybridized with bio-electrochemical systems [21], as seen in Figure 4.
Figure 4. Potential bio-electrochemically boosted processes.
As MFCs have been proven suitable for coupling with other physical, chemical, and biological systems [21], their direct integration with dark fermentative H2 fermenters can be possible [22].
Several biological conversion steps may also be linked to a cascade where each step is fed with the effluent of the previous one to decompose residual organic matter while producing a different energy carrier. For instance, Rózsenberszki et al. produced biohydrogen from municipal solid waste press liquor in the first step, and then the effluent passed through a biogas digester. [1] The remaining effluent was finally introduced to a microbial fuel cell to produce electricity while breaking down residual organic matter. While the bulk of the conversion took place in the biogas digester, both the previous and the subsequent step contributed to the overall conversion, as presented in Figure 5.
Figure 5. Conversion scheme of cascade biosystems.
By connecting more MFCs together, the global power production of the stacked (and scaled-up) configuration operated in the continuous mode could be improved [23]; however, efforts will be needed to eliminate limitations originating from the voltage reversal phenomenon [24].


  1. Rózsenberszki, T.; Koók, L.; Bakonyi, P.; Nemestóthy, N.; Logroño, W.; Pérez, M.; Urquizo, G.; Recalde, C.; Kurdi, R.; Sarkady, A. Municipal waste liquor treatment via bio-electrochemical and fermentation (H2 + CH4) processes: Assessment of various technological sequences. Chemosphere 2017, 171, 692–701.
  2. Bakonyi, P.; Dharmaraja, J.; Shobana, S.; Koók, L.; Rózsenberszki, T.; Nemestóthy, N.; Banu J, R.; Bélafi-Bakó, K.; Kumar, G. Leachate valorization in anaerobic biosystems: Towards the realization of waste-to-energy concept via biohydrogen, biogas and bio-electrochemical processes. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 17278–17296.
  3. Bakonyi, P.; Kumar, G.; Koók, L.; Tóth, G.; Rózsenberszki, T.; Bélafi-Bakó, K.; Nemestothy, N. Microbial electrohydrogenesis linked to dark fermentation as integrated application for enhanced biohydrogen production: A review on process characteristics, experiences and lessons. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 251, 381–389.
  4. Bakonyi, P.; Nemestothy, N.; Simon, V.; Bélafi-Bakó, K. Review on the start-up experiences of continuous fermentative hydrogen producing bioreactors. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 40, 806–813.
  5. Teng, S.-X.; Tong, Z.-H.; Li, W.-W.; Wang, S.-G.; Sheng, G.-P.; Shi, X.-Y.; Liu, X.-W.; Yu, H.-Q. Electricity generation from mixed volatile fatty acids using microbial fuel cells. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 87, 2365–2372.
  6. Pasupuleti, S.B.; Srikanth, S.; Mohan, S.V.; Pant, D. Continuous mode operation of microbial fuel cell (MFC) stack with dual gas diffusion cathode design for the treatment of dark fermentation effluent. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2015, 40, 12424–12435.
  7. Liu, H.; Cheng, S.; Logan, B.E. Production of Electricity from Acetate or Butyrate Using a Single-Chamber Microbial Fuel Cell. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 658–662.
  8. Aklujkar, M.; Krushkal, J.; DiBartolo, G.; Lapidus, A.; Land, M.L.; Lovley, D.R. The genome sequence of Geobacter metallireducens: Features of metabolism, physiology and regulation common and dissimilar to Geobacter sulfurreducens. BMC Microbiol. 2009, 9, 109.
  9. Vázquez-Larios, A.L.; Solorza-Feria, O.; Vázquez-Huerta, G.; Esparza-García, F.; Rinderknecht-Seijas, N.; Poggi-Varaldo, H.M. Effects of architectural changes and inoculum type on internal resistance of a microbial fuel cell designed for the treatment of leachates from the dark hydrogenogenic fermentation of organic solid wastes. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2011, 36, 6199–6209.
  10. Ren, Z.; Ward, T.E.; Regan, J.M. Electricity Production from Cellulose in a Microbial Fuel Cell Using a Defined Binary Culture. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 4781–4786.
  11. Kim, C.; Song, Y.E.; Lee, C.R.; Jeon, B.-H.; Kim, J.R. Glycerol-fed microbial fuel cell with a co-culture of Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 and Klebsiella pneumonae J2B. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 43, 1397–1403.
  12. Chookaew, T.; Prasertsan, P.; Ren, Z.J. Two-stage conversion of crude glycerol to energy using dark fermentation linked with microbial fuel cell or microbial electrolysis cell. New Biotechnol. 2014, 31, 179–184.
  13. Goud, R.K.; Mohan, S.V. Pre-fermentation of waste as a strategy to enhance the performance of single chambered microbial fuel cell (MFC). Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2011, 36, 13753–13762.
  14. Chandrasekhar, K.; Ahn, Y.-H. Effectiveness of piggery waste treatment using microbial fuel cells coupled with elutriated-phased acid fermentation. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 244, 650–657.
  15. Pant, D.; Arslan, D.; Van Bogaert, G.; Alvarez-Gallego, Y.; De Wever, H.; Diels, L.; Vanbroekhoven, K. Integrated conversion of food waste diluted with sewage into volatile fatty acids through fermentation and electricity through a fuel cell. Environ. Technol. 2013, 34, 1935–1945.
  16. Ghasemi, M.; Ahmad, A.; Jafary, T.; Azad, A.K.; Kakooei, S.; Daud, W.R.W.; Sedighi, M. Assessment of immobilized cell reactor and microbial fuel cell for simultaneous cheese whey treatment and lactic acid/electricity production. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 9107–9115.
  17. Rivera, I.; Bakonyi, P.; Cuautle-Marín, M.A.; Buitrón, G. Evaluation of various cheese whey treatment scenarios in single-chamber microbial electrolysis cells for improved biohydrogen production. Chemosphere 2017, 174, 253–259.
  18. Wenzel, J.; Fuentes, L.; Cabezas, A.; Etchebehere, C. Microbial fuel cell coupled to biohydrogen reactor: A feasible technology to increase energy yield from cheese whey. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2017, 40, 807–819.
  19. Huang, L.; Logan, B.E. Electricity generation and treatment of paper recycling wastewater using a microbial fuel cell. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 80, 349–355.
  20. Kim, T.; An, J.; Jang, J.K.; Chang, I.S. Coupling of anaerobic digester and microbial fuel cell for COD removal and ammonia recovery. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 195, 217–222.
  21. Zhang, Y.; Liu, M.; Zhou, M.; Yang, H.; Liang, L.; Gu, T. Microbial fuel cell hybrid systems for wastewater treatment and bioenergy production: Synergistic effects, mechanisms and challenges. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 103, 13–29.
  22. Oh, S.E.; Logan, B.E. Hydrogen and electricity production from a food processing wastewater using fermentation and microbial fuel cell technologies. Water Res. 2005, 39, 4673–4682.
  23. Sugnaux, M.; Happe, M.; Cachelin, C.P.; Gloriod, O.; Huguenin, G.; Blatter, M.; Fischer, F. Two stage bioethanol refining with multi litre stacked microbial fuel cell and microbial electrolysis cell. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 221, 61–69.
  24. Kim, B.; Mohan, S.V.; Fapyane, D.; Chang, I.S. Controlling Voltage Reversal in Microbial Fuel Cells. Trends Biotechnol. 2020, 38, 667–678.
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to : , , , ,
View Times: 394
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 11 Apr 2022