1. Introduction
The sacsin gene (
SACS) is located on chromosome 13 (13q12.12: chr13:23,288,689-23,433,763, GRCh38/hg38), with 145,075 bases, and is oriented in the minus strand of DNA (
https://www.genecards.org/cgi-bin/carddisp.pl?gene=SACS accessed on 24 December 2021).
SACS comprises 10 exons, with nine coding exons, and the 10th exon contains 11,487 base pairs, notable as the longest exon among vertebrates
[1][2]. The
SACS gene encodes a large 520-kDa multidomain protein of 4579 amino acids, called sacsin. It contains several different domains, including the ubiquitin-like (UBL) domain in the N-terminal region, three sacsin internal repeat (SIRPT or SRR) domains, the helical XPC-binding domain, a sacsin J-domain and the higher eukaryotes and prokaryotes nucleotide-binding (HEPN) domain in the C-terminal region
[3]. Sacsin is expressed in several different tissues, with higher expression in the central nervous system or skin and lower expression in the pancreas and skeletal muscle. In the brain, sacsin expression is the highest in the motor system, including the cerebellum, granular system and in Purkinje cells
[2].
SACS is associated with early-onset cerebellar ataxia due to mutation, called the spastic ataxia of Charlevoix-Saguenay (ARSACS), in an autosomal recessive pattern; it was first discovered in a population by the linkage disequilibrium studies conducted in the Charlevoix-Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean (CSLSJ) region in Quebec
[4][5]. Based on several relatives with ataxia syndrome, the founder effect was present in the French Canadian population. Since this family immigrated to French Canada in the 17th century from the Perche region, it is possible that the disease was present in France, although similar cases may remain unrecognized. Other cases of
SACS ataxia in non-Quebec populations, such as in Italy, Japan, Spain, Tunisia or Turkey, were discovered
[6][7][8].
ARSACS is associated with ataxia, dysarthria, nystagmus, spasticity, distal muscle wasting and deformities in fingers or feet
[6][7]. Affected patients show slow progression of spastic ataxia, which may affect all four limbs. Patients also experience a loss of muscle tissue (amyotrophy) and language impairment (their speech became slurred). Ocular movements may also be impaired
[6][7]. Disease may occur during childhood (lower limb ataxia), but their intelligence may not be impaired. Cerebellar signs and pes cavus appear until patients reach their 20 s. Other characteristics may also be possible, such as retinal nerve fiber hypermyelination
[8][9][10]. The first characteristics of the disease may be gait initiation, which can be noticed when children start to walk (around 12–18 months of age). Childhood ataxia and spasticity may be prominent as well. In early adulthood (20 s or 30 s), disease progression may be accelerated, and patients may lose the ability to walk by the age of 50
[9]. Bladder and bowel dysfunctions could appear in patients in their 50 s
[10]. In addition, patients may show biochemical dysfunctions, such as impaired pyruvate oxidation, hyperbilirubinemia and low serum beta- or HDL lipoproteins
[11]. In patients with ARSACS, non-phosphorylated neurofilaments (NFs) may occur in different neurons, including Purkinje cells or motor neurons in the cortex. The cultured motor neurons of
SACS knockout mouse embryos presented abnormal neurofilament rearrangements
[12][13]. Abnormal mitochondrial functions were also detected, with lower mitochondrial motility and elongation. Since NFs could impact cytoskeletal organization, the alteration of NFs in patients with ARSACS may present mitochondrial impairments, resulting in elevated cellular vulnerability
[12][13]. In this review, mutations in the
SACS gene in patients with ARSACS and the potential involvement of sacsin in other forms of neurodegeneration are discussed.
2. Potential Involvement of SACS in Other Neurodegenerative Diseases
Currently,
SACS has only been related to ARSACS. According to several studies on non-functional sacsin or sacsin knockout in cell lines or mice, sacsin is involved in various cellular roles, such as chaperon functions, mitochondrial mechanisms, microtubule filament control and cell adhesion
[14]. It may not be ruled out that sacsin could exert an impact, directly or indirectly, in other types of neurodegenerative diseases (especially ataxias) than ARSACS. Since sacsin could interact with Hsp70 and ubiquitin proteasomes, its association may be involved in the defensive mechanisms against abnormal protein aggregations. When sacsin expression was attenuated, higher toxicity of repeat expansion was observed in comparison to normal sacsin expression. With Hsp70, sacsin may regulate the processing of ataxin-1 with polyglutamate expansion, especially the aberrant ataxin-1 degradation for protection against spinocerebellar ataxia-1
[2]. A putative association between sacsin and ataxin-3 was reported, where the N-terminal UbL domain of sacsin could directly interact with proteasomes. Since ataxin-3 could also interact with proteasomes, sacsin could affect the pathogenic mechanisms of ataxin-3 dysfunctions
[15].
Interestingly, newly discovered
SACS mutations in suspected patients with CMT-like neuropathy and atypical disease phenotypes suggest a potential pathological overlap between ARSACS and CMT
[4].
The involvement of the
SACS gene in other neurodegenerative diseases, such as AD, PD, ALS or CJD, has not been reported yet. Sacsin is closely involved in controlling the mitochondrial functions and dynamics. Sacsin dysfunctions have been associated with impairment of mitochondrial morphology, dynamics, organization and dysfunctions in Drp1, and could cause synaptic dysfunctions and loss of Purkinje cells
[16][17]. In addition, the interactions between Drp1 and sacsin for proper mitochondrial functions, and Drp dysfunctions in the imbalance of mitochondrial fusion or fission, could also indicate the involvement of
SACS mutations in AD, ALS, MS or PD. Altered Drp1 expression could cause the overexpression of amyloid beta, huntingtin or alpha synuclein. By interacting with Drp1, sacsin may influence the expression of different neurodegenerative-disease-related proteins indirectly. Defects in mitochondrial dynamics in other neurodegenerative disorders could be a common pathway associated with ARSACS and with
SACS mutations. Hence, the contribution of sacsin in different neurodegenerative diseases could be hypothesized
[18][19][20].
An additional putative common pathway between sacsin and other neurodegenerative diseases could be through its chaperon function. Sacsin contains homologous sequences with Hsp90. In addition, sacsin could interact with Hsp70 to exert several neuroprotective mechanisms
[21]. Hsp proteins may play as a key role in protein folding and protect neurons against various protein-folding-related diseases. Impairment of Hsps and other chaperons could result in elevated oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunctions. Overexpressed Hsp70 was reported in AD mouse models, suggesting enhanced protective mechanisms by reducing APP cleavage and amyloid peptide production. Hsp70 could also enhance the transport of Tau protein and amyloid oligomers into proteasomes
[22]. Hsp70 seemed to play an essential role in protecting against prion misfolding and aggregation
[23]. In Hsp70 knockout mice, prion propagation and toxicity was accelerated
[24]. Lastly, Hsp70 could block alpha synuclein oligomerization through a noncanonical site in the C-terminal domain to exert a protective function against PD and other synucleopathies
[24]. These studies suggest that sacsin may contribute either directly or indirectly to neuroprotection against non-ataxia-related diseases.
Figure 1 summarizes the possible common pathways between sacsin and other neurodegenerative diseases.
Figure 1. Possible disease mechanisms of sacsin protein in other neurodegenerative diseases: AD, PD, MS, CMT, ALS, SCA and CJD.
Additional evidence of an association involving common pathways between sacsin and other forms of neurodegenerative diseases was published by Morani et al. (2020)
[25]. Their study analyzed proteomic data from ARSACS mouse models and isolated cells from ARSACS patients using SomaLogic technology. Several dysregulated pathways and differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) were found to be associated with neuroinflammation, synaptogenesis or cell engulfment. Several DEPs were found, which were involved in other neurodegenerative diseases: AD, PD, dementia with Lewy bodies and spastic paraplegia. Significant DEPs in ARSACS models were ephrins (
EFNB2,
EPHA3 and
EPHB2),
SNCA,
APOE,
ICAM5,
SPHK1 and/or
STUB1. This result points to the possibility of shared pathways between ARSACS and other neurodegenerative diseases. Hence, DEPs may act as risk factors or risk modifiers for ARSACS disease progression. Nevertheless, sacsin dysfunctions may alter the expression of ARSACS-related genes/proteins and may impact the pathological mechanisms of other neurodegenerative diseases, including AD, PD, ALS and CJD
[25].
Retinal nerve thickening was reported in several ARSACS patients. Recently, optical coherence tomography (OCT) was suggested to represent a significant diagnostic tool for investigating visual impairments and diseases in retina or neuropathy, as a non-invasive and cost-effective test. Hence, OCT could observe retinal nerve fiber thickening in patients with ARSACS
[28][29]. Parkinson et al. (2018) performed OCT on patients with different types of ataxia (191) and controls (101). Retinal nerve fiber thickening was present only in ARSACS cases, and not in controls or other kinds of ataxia, such as Friedrich ataxia or spinocerebellar ataxia. This study proposed a cut-off value of 119 μm for the average retinal nerve fiber thickness. This value provided high specificity and sensitivity (100% and 99.4%, respectively) among ataxia patients
[28]. Since the retina may be an excellent source of potential surrogate biomarkers in ARSACS, Rezende Filho et al. (2021) performed fundoscopy (another simple cost-effective technique) and OCT on patients with ARSACS and other forms of ataxia (spinocerebellar ataxia, autosomal recessive cerebellar ataxia, hereditary spastic paraplegia). The investigated retinal nerve fiber thickening in ARSACS by fundoscopy provided false negative data, suggesting that this method has lower sensitivity than OCT
[30].
ARSACS patients presented other types of retinal abnormalities in comparison to control patients or those with other forms of ataxia. All ARSACS patients presented foveal hypoplasia, in addition to other impairments, such as retinal hyperplasia, sawtooth appearance or papillomacular fold. The above results suggest that monitoring neurophysiological abnormalities could yield promising biomarkers for ARSACS diagnosis
[28][30], such as nerve conduction or nerve ultrasonography. Nerve enlargement and peripheral demyelination may be useful biomarkers in ARSACS
[31][25]. Since the typical imaging biomarkers could be missing in some cases of ARSACS, Pilliod et al. analyzed 321 diagnosed patients with spinocerebellar degeneration from the SPATAX (
http://spatax.wordpress.com accessed on 23 September 2021) database. They also collected fibroblast samples from skin biopsies in 11 ARSACS patients and 8 controls in order to perform mitochondrial morphology analyses, which indicated that mitochondrial abnormalities, such as bulbed mitochondria, were common among ARSACS patients. In addition, mitochondrial mass, oxygen consumption and the ratio of mitochondrial DNA/nuclear DNA were reduced among ARSACS patients. These anomalies in the mitochondrial network may be a useful diagnostic and prognostic biomarker to predict the pathogenicity of ARSACS
[31]. Since spasticity is one of the typical key features, with reduced movement and coordination in patients with ARSACS, Lessard et al. performed the Lower Extremity Motor Coordination Test (LEMOCOT) for its possible usage in attempting diagnosis
[32]. Analyzing pendulum oscillation amplitudes and their ratios using a wireless electro-goniometer provided information on the degree of spasticity in ARSACS patients. This device could effectively measure the evolution of spasticity in patients and provide an easy tool to compare the data from the pendulum between patients and unaffected individuals. Hence, this method would be an easy, rapid and cost-effective test for ARSACS diagnosis
[33].