Submitted Successfully!
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Ver. Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 + 783 word(s) 783 2021-11-26 04:44:17 |
2 format correct Meta information modification 783 2021-12-01 10:23:32 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?


Are you sure to Delete?
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Wang, L. Housing Resources and Mismatched Housing Needs in China. Encyclopedia. Available online: (accessed on 08 December 2023).
Wang L. Housing Resources and Mismatched Housing Needs in China. Encyclopedia. Available at: Accessed December 08, 2023.
Wang, Lu. "Housing Resources and Mismatched Housing Needs in China" Encyclopedia, (accessed December 08, 2023).
Wang, L.(2021, November 30). Housing Resources and Mismatched Housing Needs in China. In Encyclopedia.
Wang, Lu. "Housing Resources and Mismatched Housing Needs in China." Encyclopedia. Web. 30 November, 2021.
Housing Resources and Mismatched Housing Needs in China

In today's China, almost 90% of households own their own home. At the same time, more than 20% of Chinese households own several properties, which is higher than in many developed countries. Only fifty years ago, China was recognized for its communist welfare-oriented housing system, which distributed public rental homes to urban residents centred around their work unit, which was the mechanism through which citizens accessed not only housing, but also education, care for preschool children, and eldercare, thus giving women, in particular, the opportunity to engage more fully in waged work. In 1998, the government proclaimed the end of state involvement in allocating housing and, in the short period since, China has shifted from a society dominated by public renters to one of the countries with the greatest rate of homeownership.

property ownership family practices Chinese middle class

1. The Rise of Inequality Driven by Housing

The political step to privatize public housing started in the UK in 1980[1](p.31) and was adopted by many former Soviet bloc countries that were transitioning from Soviet and state control to more outward-facing democracies[2](pp.71–73). Later in China, homeownership growth was brought about by selling existing public housing, both work units and then municipal housing stock to sitting tenants. It may be stated that the sale of work-unit dwellings offered the limited choice. However, for those high-grade workers whose accommodation was well-located in central neighborhoods, there was a considerable advantage[3]. While the market valuations were not cheap, they were desirable properties in high-demand areas that had retained their market advantage[4][5][6]. More recently, there has been enormous growth in homeownership, fuelled by a booming real estate market. In 2019, total sales of the real estate market reached almost CNY 16 trillion and accounted for nearly 10% of China's GDP[7].

In a study by Wu et al.[3](p.448), it is argued that “both socio-economic characteristics and socialist institutions contribute to current housing inequality”. State mechanisms, such as the hukou system, advantage those who have urban residency rights and militate against migrants and newcomers. Members of the Chinese Communist Party were more likely to be rewarded with larger housing units during the era of the state dominance of housing and were, therefore, economically advantaged in an era of privatization. Wu et al.[3] also hypothesize that human capital, understood as educational attainment, was also likely to be rewarded with higher-grade housing allocations, which translates into windfall wealth accumulation now and, in modern China, possibly better-paid employment. Huang et al.[6] reveal that many cities now offer housing subsidies to the educated and talented, which may reduce the purchase price of new housing by 50%, as well as the benefit of a local hukou.

2. The Mismatch between Housing Need and Supply

There is now a higher rate of multiple-property ownership in China among middle-income urban dwellers than in other developed nations[6]. According to research by Huang et al.[6], among owners of multiple homes, the dominant reasons for purchase were to house family members (40%); investment (30%), and for use as holiday homes (16%). Thus, it has been shown that purchasing a property can be a financial investment, can facilitate new lifestyle opportunities, or can increase the life quality of other family members.

As seen in other countries, such as the UK, households are increasingly pursuing residential property as an investment strategy and, thus, housing has become a means to securing and acquiring capital, rather than a place to live in dignity, raise a family, and prosper within a community. This is because it is valued as a commodity rather than personal habitation[8]; in short, there has been a shift from use-value to exchange-value. A more professional and financialized investor mindset is forming, even when compared to the 2000s[9]. Housing property ownership in China has become, as it has in many Western countries, a sort of private insurance against numerous life-course hazards, such as unemployment or poverty in old age, in addition to being part of a significant accumulation of wealth[10][11]. While housing has played a unique role in mediating the movement of families, it also sits at the foundation of intergenerational inequality [10][11].

The research undertaken by Huang et al.[12] argues that, now, a “Rent-Generation” is mirroring trends in the UK and elsewhere, and “millennials”, unable to finance homeownership, are postponing leaving home and forming partnerships[13][14]. Notably, homeowners are also renting places to live. This is the outcome of a mismatch in housing demands in terms of space, time, and function[12]. For example, young adults, who work in Tier 1 cities, such as Shanghai, maybe homeowners in their hometown because their parents bought them an apartment on the occasion of their marriage. The older parents leave their home to look after their grandchildren, and their adult children rent another home for them in the megacity.


  1. Murie, A. The Right to Buy? Selling off Public and Social Housing; Policy Press: Bristol, UK, 2016; pp. 31.
  2. Clapham, D.; Hegedüs, J.; Kintrea, K.; Kay, H.; Tosics, I, (Eds.); Housing Privatization in Eastern Europe; Greenwood Publishing Group: London, UK, 1996; pp. 71–73.
  3. Wu, L.; Bian, Y.; Zhang, W; Housing ownership and housing wealth: New evidence in transitional China. Housing Studies 2019 , 34, 448–468,
  4. Logan, J.R.; Fang, Y.; Zhang, Z; The winners in China’s urban housing reform. Housing Studies 2010, 25, 101–117,
  5. Zhao, W.; Ge, J; Dual institutional structure and housing inequality in transitional urban China. Research in social stratification and mobility 2014, 37, 23–41,
  6. Huang, Y.; Yi, D.; Clark, W.A.V; Multiple home ownership in Chinese cities: An institutional and cultural perspective. Cities 2020, 97, 102518,
  7. Slotta, D. Real Estate in China—Statistics and Facts; Statista Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2021.
  8. Hearne, R. A Home or a Wealth Generator? Inequality, Financialization and the Irish Housing Crisis; MURAL: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2017. Available online: (accessed on 9 November 2021).
  9. Pawson, H.; Martin, C.; Rental property investment in disadvantaged areas: The means and motivations of Western Sydney’s new landlords. Housing Studies 2021, 36, 621–643,
  10. Doling, J.; Ronald, R; Home ownership and asset-based welfare. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 2010, 25 , 165–173,
  11. Ronald, R.; Lennartz, C. Housing careers, intergenerational support and family relations. In Housing Careers, Intergenerational Support and Family Relations; Lennartz, C., Ronald, R., Eds.; Routledge: London, UK, 2019; Chapter 1, pp. 1–14. Available online: (accessed on 15 November 2021).
  12. Huang, Y.; Yi, D.; Clark, W.A.V. A; Homeownership paradox: Why do Chinese homeowners rent the housing they live in?. Housing Studies 2020 , 36, 1318–1340,
  13. Forrest, R.; The ongoing financialization of home ownership–new times, new contexts. International Journal of Housing Policy 2015, 15 , 1–5,
  14. Richard, R; Generation rent and intergenerational relations in the era of housing financialization. Critical Housing Analysis 2018, 5, 14,
Subjects: Urban Studies
Contributor MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to :
View Times: 333
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 01 Dec 2021