Submitted Successfully!
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry related to this topic through the link below:
Check Note
Ver. Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 + 2003 word(s) 2003 2021-09-23 12:07:14
Thrombosis and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
Upload a video

Thromboembolism is a common complication in patients with cancer and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Anticancer treatment is a known risk factor of cancer-associated thrombosis. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have become a mainstay of treatment in various cancers. Both venous and arterial thrombosis have been increasingly reported as adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors in recent studies, with a cumulative incidence of venous thrombosis to be 5–8% at 6 months and over 10% at 12 months. Additionally, rates of approximately 1–5% for arterial thrombosis were reported at 12 months. Data also showed an association of thromboembolism with adverse survival. Many pertinent clinical questions in this population deserve further investigation, including the risks of thrombosis associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors as compared to those with traditional systemic therapy, associated risk factors, and the optimal prevention and treatment strategies.

  • venous thromboembolism
  • arterial thrombosis
  • cancer-associated thrombosis
  • immune checkpoint inhibitors
  • anticoagulation
Subjects: Oncology ; Hematology
Contributor :
View Times: 54
Revision: 1 times (View History)
Update Time: 24 Sep 2021

1. Introduction

Patients with cancer have a 12-fold increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) compared to the general population, with the risk further increased to 23-fold in patients receiving chemotherapy or targeted therapy [1]. Cancer-associated thrombosis is linked with significant morbidity that could lead to hospitalizations, delay in cancer treatment, and even mortality. As a result, thromboembolism is the second leading cause of death in cancer patients [2]. Many factors can contribute to the increased risk of thrombosis in patients with cancer, including tumor-related factors such as type and stage of malignancy; patient-related factors such as age, history of VTE, obesity, or other co-morbidities; and treatment-related factors such as surgery or systemic anticancer therapies [3].

In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the landscape of oncology treatment. ICIs are monoclonal antibodies that target proteins that negatively regulate the immune system called immune checkpoints, including programmed cell death (PD)-1 and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) [4]. PD-1 and CTLA-4 are typically expressed on T cells and bind to PD-1 ligands on tumor cells and CD80/CD86 on antigen-presenting cells, respectively. This leads to T cell inactivation to keep the immune response in check [4]. However, tumor cells also commonly utilize this pathway to escape the immune system. Blocking these pathways results in the activation of T cells to target and kill tumor cells [4]. The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first ICI in 2011; by 2020, seven ICIs had been approved by the FDA in at least 15 cancers, and patients eligible for ICIs significantly increased from 1.5% in 2011 to 43.6% in 2018 [5][6]. They have become a mainstay of treatment and are widely used in various cancers, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, head and neck cancer, and more. Available ICIs target PD-1 (nivolumab, pembrolizumab, cemiplimab) or its ligands (atezolizumab, avelumab, durvalumab) as well as CTLA-4 (ipilimumab). ICIs are known to be associated with a wide range of immune-related toxicities, including gastrointestinal, skin, thyroid, or hematological findings such as autoimmune hemolytic anemia or thrombocytopenia.

Thrombosis had not been a commonly reported adverse event in initial phase III clinical trials leading to the approval of ICIs. However, after the routine clinical use of these agents, multiple studies started to report concerns for thrombosis, although rates varied widely. Data were also conflicting on whether ICIs were indeed associated with a higher risk of thrombosis than traditional chemotherapy.

2. Mechanism of Thrombosis Related to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

While the exact mechanisms of thrombosis associated with ICIs remain to be elucidated, several pathways have been considered. Immune checkpoint blockage has been demonstrated to be associated with a pro-inflammatory state and elevated levels of inflammatory cytokines [7]. Furthermore, mouse models showed that PD-1 played a crucial role in downregulating pro-atherogenic T cells, and blockage of PD-1 could accelerate atherogenesis with increased infiltration of macrophages and pro-inflammatory T cells in atherosclerotic plaques and enhance vascular inflammation and atherosclerosis [8][9]. The promotion of atherosclerotic plagues after ICI use was demonstrated in pre-clinical animal models and could potentially contribute to the increased arterial thrombotic events [10].

In addition, activated T cells can induce synthesis of tissue factor in monocytes and macrophages [11] and is hypothesized to be one of the mechanisms that promote hypercoagulability [12]. To further delineate the pathogenesis of ICI-associated VTE, Roopkumar et al. analyzed pre-ICI blood samples from 15 individuals who subsequently developed VTE on ICIs compared to 10 without VTE on ICIs [13]. In patients who developed a VTE, they found a significant increase in the numbers of total myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and elevated levels of inflammatory biomarkers, including CXCL8 (chemokine ligand), soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule 1, and clustering of other inflammatory cytokines including IL-1β, IL-6, TNF prior to ICI. The potential link between MDSCs and thrombosis is intriguing and could be related to platelet activation triggered by MDSCs, as found in an in-vitro study when MDSCs were exposed to metastatic tumor cells [14], as well as in other thromboinflammatory disorders such as the recent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-1) infection [15]. MDSCs can also release neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) induced by CXCL8-involved pathways and contribute to a heightened risk of thrombosis [13][16]. Moreover, the elevation of other cytokines is hypothesized to cause activation of endothelium and platelets and activate the pathologic process of immunothrombosis [13][17]. These inflammatory biomarkers could potentially be used to identify patients at high risk for VTE on ICIs in the future.

2.1. Treatment of Thrombosis

Treatment of VTE in patients with cancer on ICIs is not different from other cancer-associated thromboses, which has been covered extensively by recent guidelines and review articles [18][19][20]. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and low-molecular-weight-heparin are currently the main treatment options for cancer-associated thrombosis. Choice of anticoagulants would depend on tumor types (with the associated risk of bleeding complications), additional risk factors (such as thrombocytopenia, the presence of intracranial tumors, etc.), potential drug-drug interactions (DDI), and patient perspectives [18]. Fortunately, since ICIs are monoclonal antibodies, no significant DDIs with anticoagulants are expected or reported to date. However, ICIs may be used concurrently with other anticancer therapies or supportive care medications, which could still have potential DDIs, and therefore evaluation of DDIs among all concomitant medications remains advisable.

The optimal treatment of arterial thrombosis in patients with cancer is less clear as data are even scanter. Standard-of-care similar to what is provided for the non-cancer population is typically employed, including the utilization of antiplatelet agents with or without anticoagulation, modification of cardiovascular risk factors such as control of blood pressure, diabetes, smoking cessation, etc., and/or revascularization when indicated.

2.2. Survival and Thrombosis in Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

In patients receiving ICIs, several studies have shown that the occurrence of thrombosis was associated with worsening survival [21][22][23][13][24] while others have not [25][26][27] (Table 2). Possible explanations of worse survival in patients who developed VTE include that thrombosis is an indicator for more advanced cancer stage, worse prognosis, poorer performance status, and/or thrombosis or anticoagulation-related mortality.
Pre-clinical studies have demonstrated that coagulation factors such as factor X can help tumors escape the immune system [28]. Factor X inhibitors such as rivaroxaban were shown to enhance the effects of ICIs and immunity against tumor cells and inhibit tumor growth in mice models [28][29]. It is of great interest whether this finding can be translated into a clinical setting. However, a recent retrospective study showed no difference in response rates, progression-free or overall survival in patients receiving ICIs and therapeutic anticoagulation compared to patients who were not on anticoagulation [30]. Of note, anticoagulation included in this study was not limited to factor X inhibitors (including dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, enoxaparin, and warfarin). Moreover, the cohort of patients on anticoagulation in the study was significantly older, with poorer performance status, and a higher percentage had lung cancer, all of which were poor prognostic factors [30]. The authors performed a multivariable analysis to adjust for confounders and reached the same conclusions, but residual confounding could be present. More studies with larger sample sizes are needed.
Table 2. Thrombotic outcomes and risk factors in patients on immune checkpoint inhibitors in included studies.
Study Study Design N Follow Up [Median (IQR), Unless Specified] VTE Incidence (%, 95% CI) ATE Incidence (%, 95% CI) Risk Factors for Thrombosis Comments
Hegde et al. 2017 [31] abstract Retrospective 76 10.8 mo 18.4 2.6 Female VTE after ICI did not affect survival, but before ICI did
Ibrahimi et al. 2017 [32] abstract Retrospective 154 7 mo (198 days) 10.4 0 N/A VTE was not associated with progression-free survival
Hsu et al. 2018 [33] Retrospective 50 N/A 2 N/A N/A Focused on survival and toxicity
No follow up duration nor how VTE assessed
Bar et al. 2019 [21] Retrospective 1215 12 mo AVE (including MI, stroke, PE, multisite DVT):
6 mo: 2.6
12 mo: 3.0
AVE plus single site DVT:
6 mo: 4.9
12 mo: 5.8
  • History of AVE
  • Hypertension
  • Dyslipidemia
AVE was associated with worse survival Rate of AVE was similar in ICI vs. chemo vs. ICI+chemo in lung cancer
Nichetti et al. 2019 [22] Retrospective analysis from prospective APOLLO cohort 217 37.8 mo 7.4 6.5
  • Current smoker
  • PD-L1 > 50%
  • Not:
  • KS
  • Anticoagulant or antiplatelet agents
TE is associated with worse survival after TE
Ando et al. 2020 [34] Retrospective 122 N/A
Time to thrombosis 90 days (range 6–178)
Likely 6 mo rate
4.9 History of TE No follow up duration, unclear definition of TE
Drobni et al. 2020 [35] Retrospective 2842 2 years N/A Composite: 5.35/100 person-yrs
MI: 2.49
Stroke: 2.08
Overall study:
ICIs, age, h/o stroke, diabetes, hypertension, NSCLC, male, history of radiation
ICI was associated with increased risk of composite cardiovascular events
Statin and steroids attenuated atherosclerotic plaque progression
Deschˆenes-Simard et al. 2021 [25] Retrospective 593 12.7 (4.9–22.7) mo 9.9 (7.5–12.3)
76.5 (59.9–97.8) per 1000 person-years
  • Age < 65
  • Higher PD-L1 level
  • Smoking
  • <12 mo from diagnosis to ICIs
VTE was not correlated with survival
Gutierrez-Sainz et al. 2021 [26] Retrospective 229 9.8 mo 7 (4–10) N/A
  • Female
  • Melanoma
VTE was not an independent factor for shorter survival
Guven et al. 2021 [27] Retrospective 133 10.1 (5.8–18.5) mo 11.3 N/A
  • ECOG ≥ 1
  • KS
Median survival numerically shorter in VTE patients, not significant
Icht et al. 2021 [36] Retrospective 176 6 mo (187 days) 4.5 (2.1–8.3) N/A Not:
VTE was associated with death
Kewan et al. 2021 [37] Retrospective 552 12.1 mo 12.1 1.3
  • AC use at the time of ICIs (univariable)
  • KS
Median time to VTE 3.8 mo
KS predicts overall survival
Madison et al. 2021 [38] Retrospective 6143 * 6 mo 6.3 2.6 N/A ICIs were associated with higher risk of thrombosis compared to chemo alone but not significant in multivariable analysis
Moik et al. 2021 [23] Retrospective 672 8.5 mo 6 mo: 5.0 (3.4–6.9)
Overall: 12.9 (8.2–18.5)
6 mo: 1.0 (0.4–2.0) Overall 1.8 (0.7–3.6)
  • History of VTE
  • KS
VTE (after ICI) was associated with worse survival
Mulder et al. 2021 [1] Population cohort 370 12 mo 6 mo: 4.1 (2.3–6.7)
12 mo: 7.1 (4.2–11.1)
Roopkumar et al. 2021 [13] Retrospective 1686 438 days (range 7–1971) 6 mo: 7.1
12 mo: 10.9
Overall: 24
  • Younger age
  • Metastasis
  • Biomarkers
VTE was associated with worse survival
No difference in VTE incidence with types of ICIs
Sussman et al. 2021 [24] Retrospective 228 27.3 mo 6 mo: 8.0 (4.9–12.0)
12 mo: 12.9 (8.9–17.7)
6 mo: 2.2 (0.84–4.8)
12 mo: 4.5 (2.3–7.8)
  • Combination ICI
  • KS ≥ 1
  • History of CAD
  • Anticoagulation at treatment start
VTE was associated with worse survival
Moik et al. 2021 [39] abstract Population cohort 3259 24 mo 6 mo: 3.9 (3.3–4.7)
12 mo: 5.7 (4.9–6.6)
24 mo: 7.3 (6.2–8.4)
6 mo: 1.3 (0.9–1.8)
12 mo: 2.2 (1.7–2.8)
24 mo: 3.1 (2.4–3.8)
N/A Use of ICI was associated with 1.5 to 6.5 fold increased odds of VTE
* including N = 2685 for ICIs alone, and N = 3458 for ICIs plus chemotherapy, median age reported by groups (ICIs alone or ICIs plus chemotherapy). Abbreviations: ATE—arterial thrombosis; AVE—acute vascular events; CAD—coronary artery disease; DVT—deep vein thrombosis; ECOG—Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; h/o–history of; ICIs—immune checkpoint inhibitors; IQR—interquartile range; KS—Khorana score; MI—myocardial infarction; mo—months; N—number of patients included; N/A—not available; NSCLC—non-small cell lung cancer; PE—pulmonary embolism; TE—thromboembolism; VTE—venous thromboembolism.




3. Conclusions

ICIs have become the main treatment strategy in cancer and result in prolonged survival. Recent observational studies have shown concerns for increased risks of both venous and arterial thromboses in patients receiving ICIs than previously perceived, and patients with thromboembolic complications while on ICIs had also been shown to have worsened survival in some studies, but whether the risks are higher compared to those associated with chemotherapy remain unclear. It is important for clinicians to be aware of the potential thrombotic complications, to educate patients and recognize signs and symptoms of thrombosis, to allow prompt treatment if needed and avoid complications. Future research to evaluate risk factors and develop robust risk assessment models to allow risk stratification and effective utilization of thromboprophylaxis in this population is needed. Furthermore, whether the concurrent use of anti-Xa inhibitors, aspirin, or statins can enhance the effects of ICIs and lead to better antitumor effects and survival is of great interest.


  1. Mulder, F.I.; Horvath-Puho, E.; van Es, N.; van Laarhoven, H.W.M.; Pedersen, L.; Moik, F.; Ay, C.; Buller, H.R.; Sorensen, H.T. Venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: A population-based cohort study. Blood 2021, 137, 1959–1969.
  2. Khorana, A.A.; Francis, C.W.; Culakova, E.; Kuderer, N.M.; Lyman, G.H. Thromboembolism is a leading cause of death in cancer patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2007, 5, 632–634.
  3. Ay, C.; Pabinger, I.; Cohen, A.T. Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: Burden, mechanisms, and management. Thromb. Haemost. 2017, 117, 219–230.
  4. Sharma, P.; Allison, J.P. The future of immune checkpoint therapy. Science 2015, 348, 56–61.
  5. Haslam, A.; Prasad, V. Estimation of the percentage of US patients with cancer who are eligible for and respond to checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy drugs. JAMA Netw. Open 2019, 2, e192535.
  6. Vaddepally, R.K.; Kharel, P.; Pandey, R.; Garje, R.; Chandra, A.B. Review of indications of FDA-approved immune checkpoint inhibitors per NCCN guidelines with the level of evidence. Cancers 2020, 12, 738.
  7. Urwyler, P.; Earnshaw, I.; Bermudez, M.; Perucha, E.; Wu, W.; Ryan, S.; McDonald, L.; Karagiannis, S.N.; Taams, L.S.; Powell, N.; et al. Mechanisms of checkpoint inhibition-induced adverse events. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2020, 200, 141–154.
  8. Cochain, C.; Chaudhari, S.M.; Koch, M.; Wiendl, H.; Eckstein, H.H.; Zernecke, A. Programmed cell death-1 deficiency exacerbates T cell activation and atherogenesis despite expansion of regulatory T cells in atherosclerosis-prone mice. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e93280.
  9. Bu, D.X.; Tarrio, M.; Maganto-Garcia, E.; Stavrakis, G.; Tajima, G.; Lederer, J.; Jarolim, P.; Freeman, G.J.; Sharpe, A.H.; Lichtman, A.H. Impairment of the programmed cell death-1 pathway increases atherosclerotic lesion development and inflammation. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2011, 31, 1100–1107.
  10. Inno, A.; Chiampan, A.; Lanzoni, L.; Verze, M.; Molon, G.; Gori, S. Immune checkpoint inhibitors and atherosclerotic vascular events in cancer patients. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2021, 8, 484.
  11. Del Prete, G.; De Carli, M.; Lammel, R.M.; D’Elios, M.M.; Daniel, K.C.; Giusti, B.; Abbate, R.; Romagnani, S. Th1 and Th2 T-helper cells exert opposite regulatory effects on procoagulant activity and tissue factor production by human monocytes. Blood 1995, 86, 250–257.
  12. Horio, Y.; Takamatsu, K.; Tamanoi, D.; Sato, R.; Saruwatari, K.; Ikeda, T.; Nakane, S.; Nakajima, M.; Saeki, S.; Ichiyasu, H.; et al. Trousseau’s syndrome triggered by an immune checkpoint blockade in a non-small cell lung cancer patient. Eur. J. Immunol. 2018, 48, 1764–1767.
  13. Roopkumar, J.; Swaidani, S.; Kim, A.S.; Thapa, B.; Gervaso, L.; Hobbs, B.P.; Wei, W.; Alban, T.J.; Funchain, P.; Kundu, S.; et al. Increased Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism with Cancer Immunotherapy. Med 2021, 2, 423–434.
  14. Boutte, A.M.; McDonald, W.H.; Shyr, Y.; Yang, L.; Lin, P.C. Characterization of the MDSC proteome associated with metastatic murine mammary tumors using label-free mass spectrometry and shotgun proteomics. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e22446.
  15. Sacchi, A.; Grassi, G.; Notari, S.; Gili, S.; Bordoni, V.; Tartaglia, E.; Casetti, R.; Cimini, E.; Mariotti, D.; Garotto, G.; et al. Expansion of Myeloid Derived Suppressor Cells Contributes to Platelet Activation by L-Arginine Deprivation during SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Cells 2021, 10, 2111.
  16. Alfaro, C.; Teijeira, A.; Onate, C.; Perez, G.; Sanmamed, M.F.; Andueza, M.P.; Alignani, D.; Labiano, S.; Azpilikueta, A.; Rodriguez-Paulete, A.; et al. Tumor-Produced Interleukin-8 Attracts Human Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells and Elicits Extrusion of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (NETs). Clin. Cancer Res. 2016, 22, 3924–3936.
  17. Engelmann, B.; Massberg, S. Thrombosis as an intravascular effector of innate immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2013, 13, 34–45.
  18. Carrier, M.; Wang, T.F. Direct oral anticoagulants and cancer-associated VTE: Good for all, or just some? Blood 2020, 136, 669–673.
  19. Lyman, G.H.; Carrier, M.; Ay, C.; Di Nisio, M.; Hicks, L.K.; Khorana, A.A.; Leavitt, A.D.; Lee, A.Y.Y.; Macbeth, F.; Morgan, R.L.; et al. American Society of Hematology 2021 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: Prevention and treatment in patients with cancer. Blood Adv. 2021, 5, 927–974.
  20. Key, N.S.; Khorana, A.A.; Kuderer, N.M.; Bohlke, K.; Lee, A.Y.Y.; Arcelus, J.I.; Wong, S.L.; Balaban, E.P.; Flowers, C.R.; Francis, C.W.; et al. Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis and Treatment in Patients With Cancer: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Update. J. Clin. Oncol. 2020, 38, 496–520.
  21. Bar, J.; Markel, G.; Gottfried, T.; Percik, R.; Leibowitz-Amit, R.; Berger, R.; Golan, T.; Daher, S.; Taliansky, A.; Dudnik, E.; et al. Acute vascular events as a possibly related adverse event of immunotherapy: A single-institute retrospective study. Eur. J. Cancer 2019, 120, 122–131.
  22. Nichetti, F.; Ligorio, F.; Zattarin, E.; Signorelli, D.; Prelaj, A.; Proto, C.; Galli, G.; Marra, A.; Apollonio, G.; Porcu, L.; et al. Is there an interplay between immune checkpoint inhibitors, thromboprophylactic treatments and thromboembolic events? Mechanisms and impact in non-small cell lung cancer patients. Cancers 2019, 12, 67.
  23. Moik, F.; Chan, W.-S.E.; Wiedemann, S.; Hoeller, C.; Tuchmann, F.; Aretin, M.-B.; Fuereder, T.; Zochbauer-Muller, S.; Preusser, M.; Pabinger, I.; et al. Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of venous and arterial thromboembolism in immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Blood 2021, 137, 1669–1678.
  24. Sussman, T.A.; Li, H.; Hobbs, B.; Funchain, P.; McCrae, K.R.; Khorana, A.A. Incidence of thromboembolism in patients with melanoma on immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy and its adverse association with survival. J. Immunother. Cancer 2021, 9, e001719.
  25. Deschenes-Simard, X.; Richard, C.; Galland, L.; Blais, F.; Desilets, A.; Malo, J.; Cvetkovic, L.; Belkaid, W.; Elkrief, A.; Gagne, A.; et al. Venous thrombotic events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors for non-small cell lung cancer: A retrospective multicentric cohort study. Thromb. Res. 2021, 205, 29–39.
  26. Gutierrez-Sainz, L.; Martinez-Marin, V.; Vinal, D.; Martinez-Perez, D.; Pedregosa, J.; Garcia-Cuesta, J.A.; Villamayor, J.; Zamora, P.; Pinto, A.; Redondo, A.; et al. Incidence of venous thromboembolic events in cancer patients receiving immunotherapy: A single-institution experience. Clin. Transl. Oncol. 2021, 23, 1245–1252.
  27. Guven, D.C.; Aksun, M.S.; Sahin, T.K.; Aktepe, O.H.; Yildirim, H.C.; Taban, H.; Ceylan, F.; Kertmen, N.; Arik, Z.; Dizdar, O.; et al. Poorer baseline performance status is associated with increased thromboembolism risk in metastatic cancer patients treated with immunotherapy. Supportive Care Cancer 2021, 29, 5417–5423.
  28. Ruf, W.; Graf, C. Coagulation signaling and cancer immunotherapy. Thromb. Res. 2020, 191, S106–S111.
  29. Graf, C.; Wilgenbus, P.; Pagel, S.; Pott, J.; Marini, F.; Reyda, S.; Kitano, M.; Macher-Goppinger, S.; Weiler, H.; Ruf, W. Myeloid cell-synthesized coagulation factor X dampens antitumor immunity. Sci. Immunol. 2019, 4, eaaw8405.
  30. Johannet, P.; Sawyers, A.; Gulati, N.; Donnelly, D.; Kozloff, S.; Qian, Y.; Floristan, A.; Hernando, E.; Zhong, J.; Osman, I. Treatment with therapeutic anticoagulation is not associated with immunotherapy response in advanced cancer patients. J. Transl. Med. 2021, 19, 1–7.
  31. Hegde, A.M.; Stroud, C.R.; Cherry, C.R.; Yogarajah, M.; Cherukuri, S.D.; Walker, P.R. Incidence and impact of thromboembolic events in lung cancer patients treated with nivolumab. J. Clin. Oncol. 2017, 35, e20624.
  32. Ibrahimi, S.; Machiorlatti, M.; Vesely, S.K.; Malla, M.; Modhia, F.; Jones, S.A.; Roman, D.; Cherry, M.A. Incidence of Vascular Thromboembolic Events in Patients Receiving Immunotherapy: A Single Institution Experience; American Society of Hematology: Washington, DC, USA, 2017; p. 4864.
  33. Hsu, J.C.; Lin, J.Y.; Hsu, M.Y.; Lin, P.C. Effectiveness and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors: A retrospective study in Taiwan. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0202725.
  34. Ando, Y.; Hayashi, T.; Sugimoto, R.; Nishibe, S.; Ito, K.; Kawada, K.; Ikeda, Y.; Yamada, S.; Imaizumi, K. Risk factors for cancer-associated thrombosis in patients undergoing treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Investig. New Drugs 2020, 38, 1200–1206.
  35. Drobni, Z.D.; Alvi, R.M.; Taron, J.; Zafar, A.; Murphy, S.P.; Rambarat, P.K.; Mosarla, R.C.; Lee, C.; Zlotoff, D.A.; Raghu, V.K.; et al. Association between immune checkpoint inhibitors with cardiovascular events and atherosclerotic plaque. Circulation 2020, 142, 2299–2311.
  36. Icht, O.; Darzi, N.; Shimony, S.; Jacobi, O.; Reinhorn, D.; Landman, Y.; Mutai, R.; Averbuch, I.; Shochat, T.; Spectre, G.; et al. Venous thromboembolism incidence and risk assessment in lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2021, 19, 1250–1258.
  37. Kewan, T.; Ko, T.; Flores, M.; Sallam, Y.; Haddad, A.; Daw, H. Prognostic impact and risk factors of cancer-associated thrombosis events in stage-IV cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Eur. J. Haematol. 2021, 106, 682–688.
  38. Madison, C.J.; Melson, R.A.; Conlin, M.J.; Gundle, K.R.; Thompson, R.F.; Calverley, D.C. Thromboembolic risk in patients with lung cancer receiving systemic therapy. Br. J. Haematol. 2021, 194, 179–190.
  39. Moik, F.; Ay, C.; Horváth-Puhó, E.; Pabinger, I.; Mulder, F.I.; van Es, N.; Sørensen, H.T. Risk of Venous and Arterial Thromboembolic Events in Patients Receiving Targeted Anti-Cancer Therapy—A Nationwide Cohort Study. In Proceedings of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Congress, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 17–21 July 2021.
Subjects: Oncology ; Hematology
Contributor :
View Times: 54
Revision: 1 times (View History)
Update Time: 24 Sep 2021
Table of Contents


    Are you sure to Delete?

    Video Upload Options

    Do you have a full video?
    If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
    Wang, T. Thrombosis and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. Encyclopedia. Available online: (accessed on 03 July 2022).
    Wang T. Thrombosis and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. Encyclopedia. Available at: Accessed July 03, 2022.
    Wang, Tzu-Fei. "Thrombosis and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors," Encyclopedia, (accessed July 03, 2022).
    Wang, T. (2021, September 24). Thrombosis and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. In Encyclopedia.
    Wang, Tzu-Fei. ''Thrombosis and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.'' Encyclopedia. Web. 24 September, 2021.