Submitted Successfully!
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Ver. Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 + 1334 word(s) 1334 2021-08-12 12:02:21 |
2 The format is correct Meta information modification 1334 2021-09-28 03:22:17 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?


Are you sure to Delete?
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Chang, K. HSP Injection Therapies in Stroke. Encyclopedia. Available online: (accessed on 30 November 2023).
Chang K. HSP Injection Therapies in Stroke. Encyclopedia. Available at: Accessed November 30, 2023.
Chang, Ke-Vin. "HSP Injection Therapies in Stroke" Encyclopedia, (accessed November 30, 2023).
Chang, K.(2021, September 23). HSP Injection Therapies in Stroke. In Encyclopedia.
Chang, Ke-Vin. "HSP Injection Therapies in Stroke." Encyclopedia. Web. 23 September, 2021.
HSP Injection Therapies in Stroke

Hemiplegic shoulder pain (HSP) is one of the most debilitating complications after stroke [1]. Hemiplegic shoulder pain (HSP) hampers post-stroke functional recovery and is not well managed with conservative treatments.

corticosteroid hemiplegic shoulder hyaluronic acid injection rehabilitation

1. Introduction

Hemiplegic shoulder pain (HSP) is one of the most debilitating complications after stroke [1]. Its reported incidence varies from 30% to 72% at one-year follow-up across different studies [2][3][4]. HSP is mostly graded as ranging from moderate to severe intensity [4] and rarely resolves spontaneously [3]. Stroke patients with poor upper extremity function have an increased risk of HSP [5]. Various theories have been proposed for the development of HSP, including deficiency in pain adaption [6], central sensitization to normal or subthreshold sensory stimuli [7], and impaired neuromuscular control of the scapula [8]. Spasticity over the hemiplegic limbs, shoulder subluxation, concomitant rotator cuff pathology, and prolonged immobilization of the affected limbs are also reported to be associated with HSP [9]. Without adequate management, HSP further worsens the function of the upper extremities and can prolong the hospital stay [2].

Shoulder slings, passive range of motion exercises, analgesics, and electrical stimulation have been commonly applied for treating HSP, although their effects are usually limited [10]. In recent years, various injection therapies have been proposed in its management. For instance, suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) using local anesthetics can be performed to decrease nociception from the glenohumeral joint [11]. Intramuscular botulinum toxin (BoNT) injections are also effective in reducing spasticity of the hemiplegic limbs and the associated pain [12]. On the other hand, BoNT injections are beneficial for decreasing chronic shoulder pain, possibly through inhibition of the release of pain mediators [13]. Corticosteroid injections have long been used to treat painful shoulders owing to their anti-inflammatory potential, while intra-articular hyaluronic acid (HA) injections might prevent adhesions and reduce synovitis inside the glenohumeral joint [14].

2. Injection Therapies for Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain in Stroke

At the fourth-week following the interventions, SSNB was likely to rank first, followed by intramuscular BoNT injections. Concerning the period between the 4th and 24th weeks, intramuscular BoNT injections appeared to be the most effective alternative for treating HSP.
Intra-bursal BoNT injections ranked second in relieving the symptoms of HSP between the 4th and 24th weeks. The main concern is that in our network meta-analysis, only one study [15] employed intra-bursal BoNT injections. Furthermore, the aforementioned study did not use a randomized controlled design. Therefore, the effect of intra-bursal BoNT injections could not be confirmed though the sensitivity analysis by excluding non-RCTs. Although a recent meta-analysis reported the superiority of intra-articular/bursal injections of BoNT over corticosteroids in the management of chronic shoulder pain between the first and third months after treatment [13], more evidence is still needed to validate the benefits of intra-bursal BoNT injections for treating HSP.
The best relief of HSP seemed to be provided by SSNB at the fourth post-injection week. According to our included studies, local anesthetics, including lidocaine [11][16][17] and bupivacaine [18][19], were the main regimens used for SSNB. The onset time ranged between two (lidocaine) and five (bupivacaine) minutes [20], enabling SSNB to take effect rapidly. Although the maximum effective duration ranges from one (lidocaine) to four (bupivacaine) hours [20], the clinical effect of SSNB seemed to persist in the fourth week in our analysis. The mechanism of extended symptom relief is not clear. We also observed that some of the included trials also added corticosteroids or physiological serum into the injectate [11][16][18][17], which might reduce neurogenic inflammation and potentiate the effective duration of SSNB [21].
Intramuscular BoNT injections ranked second in the treatment outcomes of HSP at the fourth post-intervention week. Spasticity, defined as a velocity-dependent increase in muscle tone [9], commonly involves the muscles over the shoulder girdle, e.g., subscapularis, teres major, pectoralis major, latissimus dorsi muscles after stroke [9]. Accordingly, the spasticity of such muscles frequently leads to painful/limited shoulder motions. BoNT is an exotoxin produced by Clostridium botulinum, and its intramuscular injection inhibits the release of acetylcholine at the neuromuscular junction [22]. The maximum effectiveness of intramuscular BoNT injections is usually seen in the second or third post-intervention week but may be delayed due to muscle fibrosis after prolonged paresis in patients that have had a stroke [23]. This issue might have accounted for its lower rank than SSNB in the fourth-week.
Nonetheless, between the fourth and twenty-fourth weeks, intramuscular BoNT injections were found to be the best treatment for HSP. This finding is consistent with our prior assumptions. First, spasticity accounts for the leading cause of persistent HSP. A reduction of spasticity facilitates the normalization of shoulder motion and the reduction of the associated pain. Second, the maximum effect of intramuscular BoNT injections had been achieved in most of our included studies one month after the injection. The active duration of BoNT is at least three months [24], further enabling patients that have had a stroke to benefit from sustained relief of spasticity-related pain.
The doses and target muscles for intra-muscular BoNT injections varied among the included studies. Although we pooled them together for the purpose of network comparisons, the grouped finding of pain control might not be attributed to the motor inhibition only. Aside from neuromuscular blockade, animal studies found that the administration of BoNT was associated with a reduction of substance P release as well as subsequent neurogenic inflammation [25][26]. More basic research is needed to investigate the mechanism of relieving HSP through intra-muscular administration of BoNT.
Corticosteroid injections were consistently better than a placebo at both time points. Considering its well-established effects and thoroughly investigated adverse reactions in treating musculoskeletal pain [27], intra-articular/bursal corticosteroid injections can be considered as useful alternatives for HSP, especially in patients with concomitant rotator cuff or glenohumeral joint pathologies. Compared with corticosteroid injections, a previous meta-analysis revealed the non-superiority of intra-articular HA for shoulder pain management [28]. In our analysis, HA injections mostly ranked behind other non-placebo treatments, and as such, they cannot be recommended for the management of HSP.
Furthermore, SSNB was found to be the least effective among all the non-placebo treatments between the 4th and 24th weeks. This finding can be attributed to the fading effect of local anesthetics. Although SSNB is effective in pain relief by blocking sensory impulses, it does not treat the underlying causes of pain. On the other hand, intramuscular/bursal/articular administration of BoNT or corticosteroid intervenes potential pain generators (spasticity or rotator cuff pathologies).
If the treatment was a combination of two therapies, and this combination was shown in only one arm of the included studies, we would discard this therapeutic arm from the pooled analysis due to its low representativeness [19]. Furthermore, a recent systematic review reported that addition of corticosteroid to local anesthetics had only a small or no effect on the improvement of chronic non-cancer pain compared with local anesthetics alone [29]. Therefore, if one study comprised two similar treatment arms (e.g., one group received SSNB with local anesthetic and the other group underwent the same block with additional corticosteroids) [17], we combined the data from both arms for the analysis.
First, SSNB can be used as the first-line injection therapy in HSP due to its rapid onset. However, its effect is less sustaining, and repeat blocks or subsequent treatments targeting the underlying pain generators might be required. Second, if there is concomitant upper extremity spasticity, BoNT injections for the spastic periarticular muscles should be prioritized in managing HSP.

3. Conclusions

SSNB was likely to rank first in relieving HSP at the fourth post-treatment week although the probability of being the best treatment was approximately 50%. Furthermore, care should be taken due to its short duration of effectiveness and a lack of enough studies with head-to-head comparisons of SSNB vs. other injection regimens. Intra-muscular BoNT injections seem to be the best treatment in the post-injection period between the 4th and 24th weeks. Concomitant spasticity in the shoulder girdle muscles should be evaluated as a potential source of HSP and properly managed using intra-muscular BoNT injections. If rotator cuff pathologies are suspected clinically, intra-articular/bursal corticosteroid injections can be administered. Further prospective studies are warranted to investigate the combined efficacy of different injections and their long-term therapeutic efficacy in treating HSP.


  1. McLean, D.E. Medical complications experienced by a cohort of stroke survivors during inpatient, tertiary-level stroke rehabilitation. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2004, 85, 466–469.
  2. Roy, C.W.; Sands, M.R.; Hill, L.D. Shoulder pain in acutely admitted hemiplegics. Clin. Rehabil. 1994, 8, 334–340.
  3. Adey-Wakeling, Z.; Arima, H.; Crotty, M.; Leyden, J.; Kleinig, T.; Anderson, C.S.; Newbury, J.; Collaborative, S.S. Incidence and associations of hemiplegic shoulder pain poststroke: Prospective population-based study. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2015, 96, 241–247.e1.
  4. Lindgren, I.; Jonsson, A.-C.; Norrving, B.; Lindgren, A. Shoulder pain after stroke: A prospective population-based study. Stroke 2007, 38, 343–348.
  5. Kim, Y.H.; Jung, S.J.; Yang, E.J.; Paik, N.J. Clinical and sonographic risk factors for hemiplegic shoulder pain: A longitudinal observational study. J. Rehabil. Med. 2014, 46, 81–87.
  6. Kashi, Y.; Ratmansky, M.; Defrin, R. Deficient Pain Modulation in Patients with Chronic Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain. Pain Pract. 2018, 18, 716–728.
  7. Klit, H.; Finnerup, N.B.; Jensen, T.S. Central post-stroke pain: Clinical characteristics, pathophysiology, and management. Lancet Neurol. 2009, 8, 857–868.
  8. De Baets, L.; Jaspers, E.; Janssens, L.; Van Deun, S. Characteristics of neuromuscular control of the scapula after stroke: A first exploration. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2014, 8, 933.
  9. Murie-Fernández, M.; Iragui, M.C.; Gnanakumar, V.; Meyer, M.; Foley, N.; Teasell, R. Painful hemiplegic shoulder in stroke patients: Causes and management. Neurología 2012, 27, 234–244.
  10. Benlidayi, I.C.; Basaran, S. Hemiplegic shoulder pain: A common clinical consequence of stroke. Pract. Neurol. 2014, 14, 88–91.
  11. Aydın, T.; Şen, E.İ.; Yardımcı, M.Y.; Kesiktaş, F.N.; Öneş, K.; Paker, N. Efficacy of ultrasound-guided suprascapular nerve block treatment in patients with painful hemiplegic shoulder. Neurol. Sci. 2019, 40, 985–991.
  12. Marciniak, C.M.; Harvey, R.L.; Gagnon, C.M.; Duraski, S.A.; Denby, F.A.; McCarty, S.; Bravi, L.A.; Polo, K.M.; Fierstein, K.M. Does botulinum toxin type A decrease pain and lessen disability in hemiplegic survivors of stroke with shoulder pain and spasticity?: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2012, 91, 1007–1019.
  13. Hsu, P.-C.; Wu, W.-T.; Han, D.-S.; Chang, K.-V. Comparative Effectiveness of Botulinum Toxin Injection for Chronic Shoulder Pain: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Toxins 2020, 12, 251.
  14. Huang, Y.-C.; Leong, C.-P.; Tso, H.-H.; Chen, M.-J.; Liaw, M.-Y.; Hsieh, H.-C.; Wang, L.-Y.; Hsu, C.-H. The long-term effects of hyaluronic acid on hemiplegic shoulder pain and injury in stroke patients: A randomized controlled study. Medicine 2018, 97, e12078.
  15. Wu, T.; Song, H.-X.; Li, Y.Z.; Ye, Y.; Li, J.-H.; Hu, X.Y. Clinical effectiveness of ultrasound guided subacromial-subdeltoid bursa injection of botulinum toxin type A in hemiplegic shoulder pain: A retrospective cohort study. Medicine 2019, 98, e17933.
  16. Kasapoğlu-Aksoy, M.; Aykurt-Karlıbel, İ.; Altan, L. Comparison of the efficacy of intramuscular botulinum toxin type-A injection into the pectoralis major and the teres major muscles and suprascapular nerve block for hemiplegic shoulder pain: A prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Neurol. Sci. 2020, 41, 2225–2230.
  17. Terlemez, R.; Ciftci, S.; Topaloglu, M.; Dogu, B.; Yilmaz, F.; Kuran, B. Suprascapular nerve block in hemiplegic shoulder pain: Comparison of the effectiveness of placebo, local anesthetic, and corticosteroid injections-a randomized controlled study. Neurol. Sci. 2020, 41, 3243–3247.
  18. Adey-Wakeling, Z.; Crotty, M.; Shanahan, E.M. Suprascapular nerve block for shoulder pain in the first year after stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Stroke 2013, 44, 3136–3141.
  19. Sencan, S.; Celenlioglu, A.E.; Karadag-Saygı, E.; Midi, İ.; Gunduz, O.H. Effects of fluoroscopy-guıded intraartıcular injectıon, suprascapular nerve block, and combınatıon therapy ın hemıplegıc shoulder paın: A prospective double-blınd, randomızed clınıcal study. Neurol. Sci. 2019, 40, 939–946.
  20. Achar, S.; Kundu, S. Principles of office anesthesia: Part I. Infiltrative anesthesia. Am. Fam. Phys. 2002, 66, 91.
  21. Barnes, P.J.; Adcock, I.; Spedding, M.; Vanhoutte, P.M. Anti-inflammatory actions of steroids: Molecular mechanisms. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 1993, 14, 436–441.
  22. Jankovic, J. Botulinum toxin in clinical practice. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2004, 75, 951–957.
  23. Wissel, J.; Ward, A.B.; Erztgaard, P.; Bensmail, D.; Hecht, M.J.; Lejeune, T.M.; Schnider, P. European consensus table on the use of botulinum toxin type A in adult spasticity. J. Rehabil. Med. 2009, 41, 13–25.
  24. Flynn, T.C. Botulinum toxin. Am. J. Clin. Dermatol. 2010, 11, 183–199.
  25. Hou, Y.-P.; Zhang, Y.-P.; Song, Y.-F.; Zhu, C.-M.; Wang, Y.-C.; Xie, G.-L. Botulinum toxin type A inhibits rat pyloric myoelectrical activity and substance P release in vivo. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2007, 85, 209–214.
  26. Matak, I.; Tékus, V.; Bölcskei, K.; Lacković, Z.; Helyes, Z. Involvement of substance P in the antinociceptive effect of botulinum toxin type A: Evidence from knockout mice. Neuroscience 2017, 358, 137–145.
  27. Stephens, M.B.; Beutler, A.; O’Connor, F.G. Musculoskeletal injections: A review of the evidence. Am. Fam. Phys. 2008, 78, 971–976.
  28. Lee, L.-C.; Lieu, F.-K.; Lee, H.-L.; Tung, T.-H. Effectiveness of hyaluronic acid administration in treating adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 314120.
  29. Shanthanna, H.; Busse, J.; Wang, L.; Kaushal, A.; Harsha, P.; Suzumura, E.A.; Bhardwaj, V.; Zhou, E.; Couban, R.; Paul, J.; et al. Addition of corticosteroids to local anaesthetics for chronic non-cancer pain injections: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Br. J. Anaesth. 2020, 125, 779–801.
Contributor MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to :
View Times: 260
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 28 Sep 2021