Table of Contents

    Topic review

    UV Lighting in Horticulture

    View times: 17
    Submitted by: Pietro Santamaria

    Definition

    Ultraviolet (UV) is a component of solar radiation that can be divided into three types defined by waveband: UV-A (315–400 nm), UV-B (280–315 nm), and UV-C (<280 nm).

    1. Introduction

    Climate change, global water scarcity, and salinization have negatively affected arable land [1]. Global warming decreases production [2], while the demand for fresh high-quality vegetables is increasing. Efficient artificial growing systems are essential to feed a human population in constant increase [3]. Greenhouse and indoor plant production systems produce clean fresh food, increasing yield and quality by controlling plant growth conditions. The latest technology in light emitting diode (LED) lighting is being adopted by farmers and allows broad control of spectra in the case of urban farming with fully artificial lighting. Spectrum modulation makes it possible to control growth and quality, including plant architecture, nutrient content, and phytochemical levels [4][5][6][7]. LED lighting can be used to complement natural daylight. Ultraviolet (UV) is part of the light spectrum, and can be divided into three types by waveband: UV-A (315–400 nm), UV-B (280–315 nm), and UV-C (<280 nm). UV-C and most UV-B is absorbed by the stratospheric ozone layer, whereas UV-A and a small part of UV-B reach the earth’s surface and can be absorbed by plants. Although UV-B is the smallest component of sunlight (<0.5% of the total energy reaching the surface), it has the highest energy and has a considerable impact on animals and plants [8].

    UV light has a great impact on plant growth and quality, in relation to wavelength, intensity and exposure. Several studies have shown that high UV-A doses have a negative effect on PSII elaboration, decreasing maximum quantum efficiency, electron transport rate and photosynthesis due to a reduction in ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase-oxygenase (RuBisCO) (C3 species) or PEP carboxylase (C4 species) and an increase in stomatal resistance and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production [9][10][11][12][13]. UV-B can induce abiotic stress and photomorphogenic changes. High UV-B exposure induces physiological stress, including ROS production, DNA deterioration and damage, and impairment of cell processes [14]. Low UV-B exposure promotes photomorphogenic changes, such as cotyledon expansion, biosynthesis of anthocyanins and flavonoids, inhibition of hypocotyl growth and stomatal opening [8][15][16]. Interaction between plants and UV light is regulated by photoreceptors, such as UV Resistance Locus 8 (UVR8), that allows acclimation to UV-B stress [8][16][17]. UVR8 is associated with the chromatin of UV-B-responsive genes, such as the promoter region of elongated hypocotyl 5 (HY5). UVR8 activity is also associated with the E3 ubiquitin ligase, known as constitutively photomorphogenic 1 (COP1). UVR8 interacts with COP1, and both are associated with photomorphogenic response [18].

    Like UV-B, UV-C triggers stress responses in plants and may damage DNA and modify the functioning of chloroplasts and mitochondria [19][20][21]. Stressed plants may react by producing ROS. ROS signaling modifies physiological processes and produces secondary metabolites [21][22][23].

    Exposure to UV also has a great impact on human health: the effects of UV radiation can manifest in the short and long term. Sunburn, tanning, and photosensitivity are the most common short-term effects [24]. Long term effects range from lentigines to melanocytic naevi, actinic keratosis and skin cancer [24]. Eyes can also be affected by UV exposure, manifesting as photokeratitis, cancer of the eye and cataract. Occupational exposure to UV should be kept to a minimum and protection should be always be worn. The risk can be drastically reduced by wearing appropriate closely woven clothing and a brimmed hat to reduce face and neck exposure. Sunscreen and eye protection (in relation to light type and intensity) are also advisable [24].

    2. UV Influence on Growth and Inhibition

    Although UV light is known to damage quality and production parameters, some studies show stimulatory effects of UV-A on biomass accumulation (roots and shoots) in certain species. The response of plants to UV radiation may be species-specific, ranging from stimulation to inhibition [25][26][27][28][29]. Among the studies that have shown species-specific effects of UV-A, promotion of biomass accumulation in roots was found in four Mediterranean species, including Laurus nobilis, grown with little irrigation [28][29]. This was attributed to improved efficiency of water use and increased photosynthesis rates, indicating that growth improvement was the result of UV and environmental factors. Changes in biomass allocation have also been linked to different allocation of resources [30]. This was reported in four cultivars of cucumber (Cucumis sativus) which showed a decrease in shoot biomass accumulation with no effects on roots after UV-A exposure [31]. Similar results were observed in Triticum sativum [32] and in four Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes studied by Cooley et al. [26]. Negative effects of UV-A on shoot biomass were attributed to direct exposure of aerial parts to sunlight and it was argued that promotion of root growth was associated with UV-A photoreceptors in shoots, implicated in the transmission of long-distance signals that regulate root growth. Promotion of root growth by UV-A with no effects on shoots was also found in two cultivars of Glycine max under greenhouse conditions [33].

    UV-B has also been found to affect growth. Several authors have reported a stimulatory effect of 4.15 μmol·m−2·s−1 UV-B [34][35] and 0.86 μmol·m−2·s−1 UV-B [35] on photosynthesis in cucumber seedlings. Other studies showed inhibition of hypocotyl elongation in cucumber [36][37], as well as promotion of stem diameter growth at medium intensity (3.33 μmol·m−2·s−1 UV-B), without any damage, and a decrease in net photosynthesis at high intensity (5.54 or 6.67 μmol·m−2·s−1) [37]. In studies by Liu et al. [37], 3.33 μmol·m−2·s−1 UV-B promoted stem diameter growth, soluble sugar content, total ascorbic acid, and superoxide dismutase, peroxidase and catalase activities in cucumber leaves by 13.6–22.3%, 22.7–56.7%, 16.9–23.2%, 23.8–25.9%, 34.1–50.4% and 27.4–36.4%, respectively, without compromising net photosynthesis rate.

    Recent studies have evaluated the effects of UV-C on plant growth and photosynthesis. A positive effect of UV-C was found by Darras et al. [38] on ‘Belladona F1’ tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) plants. Irradiated with UV-C at 1.0 kJ m−2, the plants showed a 25% increase in total fruit number and a 36% increase in fruit weight compared to non-irradiated controls. A smaller increase was found with 2.5 kJ·m−2 (24% and 31%, respectively). In the same experiment, UV-C was found to decrease plant height and net CO2 assimilation. Other evidence from the same experiment showed that pulsed UV-C irradiation induced changes in growth and fruit set in ‘Belladonna F1’ tomato plants. This higher yield of tomatoes may be due to shared UV-B photoreceptors also absorbing UV-C light [21], as occurs in some photomorphogenic reactions, promoting an increase in biomass [38].

    Earlier experiments showed that pre-harvest UV-C irradiation induced flowering in certain ornamental plants [39][40][41][42]. In most cases there was no decrease in net CO2 assimilation between UV-C-irradiated plants and controls, which means no damage to PSII. Similar results were found in other species: chlorophyll fluorescence (Fv/Fm) of lettuce (Lactuca sativa) plants exposed to UV-C light was not reduced by doses up to 1.70 kJ·m−2, indicating no damage to PSII [43]. On the contrary, there was a significant decrease in net CO2 assimilation, stomatal conductance, Fv/Fm and yield in strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) plants exposed to 1.5 kJ·m−2 every four days [44]. This means that effects may be species-specific.

    3. UV-Mediated Production of Healthy Compounds

    3.1. Total Phenol Content

    Phenol compounds are secondary metabolites that are usually related to plant defense responses. Light plays an important role in several kinds of biotic and abiotic stimulation, triggering production of various phytochemicals (Figure 1). Several studies have shown that UV-A and UV-B signaling can both increase phenol content [45,46,47]. Studies on UV signaling have shown that UV-A and UV-B interact with different photoreceptors and/or mechanisms. The increase in phenol content mediated by UV-A was delayed in lettuce and Ixeris dentata with respect to the same response mediated by UV-B [30][46][47]. UV-B stress can increase the content of secondary metabolites useful for human health. For example, abiotic stress induced by exposure of mung bean sprouts to UV-B leads to significant accumulation of vitamin C, phenols and flavonoids, improving nutritional value [48]. These findings are in line with the results of experiments on buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum) sprouts [49], tomato [50], and Hypericum spp. [51]. Production of vitamin C, phenols and flavonoids in mung bean (Vigna radiata) sprouts may be promoted by low-dose irradiation with UV-B [48].

    Figure 1. UV-A effects on photosynthesis. A plus (+) sign indicates enhanced response (either positive or negative); a green arrow indicates a positive response, and a red arrow indicates a negative response. (A) High intensity UV-A exposure enhanced photoinhibition in isolated photosynthetic structures (chloroplasts and thylakoids), whereas leaves exposed to UV-A activate photoprotective mechanisms (leaf phenols and antioxidant enzymes), reducing photoinhibition. (B) Under non-saturating light exposure, direct (a) or indirect (b) UV-A absorption by photosynthetic pigments induced blue-green fluorescence by phenols, and/or (c) increased stomatal opening, leading to enhanced photosynthesis rates [30].

    3.2. Flavonoid Content

    Flavonoids are the major group of phenols related to responses to UV, and have a main antioxidant function [52]. Previous studies have established that flavonoids have UV-A and UV-B-absorbing properties. Most flavonoids absorb in the 315–400 nm UV-A range [53], playing an important role as antioxidants and protective compounds [54][55]. Several studies have shown that UV-A promotes accumulation of flavonols in Mesembryanthemum crystallinum [56]. Morales et al. [57] and Götz et al. [45] found that production was dose-dependent in Betula pendula and Arabidopsis thaliana, respectively. Besides light, other environmental factors modulate UV-A interactions with plants. For example, flavonoid levels in Pinus sylvestris, modulated by UV-A exposure, were enhanced under high, but not low nutrient availability. UV-A exposure decreased leaf content of quercetin derivatives in Arbutus unedo under low precipitation [58][59].

    3.3. Light-Absorbing Phenol Compounds

    Phenol compounds are an important group of phenylalanine-derived secondary metabolites with a wide range of properties, making them suitable for the food, pesticide, pharmaceutical and cosmetic industries [60]. Phenol compound biosynthesis in plants is regulated by UV-A [30] (Figure 1) and UV-B [60] radiation. Lighting dose may be modulated to maximize plant performance and accumulation of secondary metabolites [61]. Based on studies by Murthy et al. [62], UV-B stimulation of phenol compounds may be exploited in two steps: (i) plants are cultivated under optimal conditions until a determined growth stage; (ii) secondary metabolism is stimulated by UV-B to enhance phenol production. Species selection is essential as certain species may be naturally rich in secondary metabolites. For example, sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum L.), a member of the Lamiaceae family, accumulates high levels of different phenols, especially rosmarinic acid. These compounds can be used in the cosmetic, food and pesticide industries [63][64][65]. Several studies have shown that phenol production increased in sweet basil plants exposed to UV-B light [66][67]. Phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) is the key enzyme of phenylpropanoid metabolism, triggering the biosynthesis of phenol compounds; several studies have shown that UV-B stress modulates an increase in PAL [68]. Mosadegh et al. [69] showed that plants treated with 34, 68 and 102 kJ·m−2·day−1 UV-B have enhanced production of phenols compared to controls, reaching the highest values at 102 kJ·m−2·day−1. This could be due to a dose-dependent effect.

    3.4. Carotenoid Production

    Different factors influence carotenoid production. Light interacts with phytochrome and/or UV-B receptors, regulating carotenoid accumulation [70], while ethylene modulates abiotic stress, including light stress [71]. Several studies report that UV-B radiation stimulates ethylene production in green tissues of many species, such as pear (Pyrus spp.) shoots, Arabidopsis, tobacco (Nicotiana spp.), and tomato [72][73][74], mediated by the ROS pathway. UV-B-mediated carotenogenesis is also influenced by genotype: indeed, different responses to UV-B exposure, related to endogenous ripening factors, have been described in different tomato genotypes [75][76]. Other studies found that carotenoid biosynthesis genes are generally down-regulated after chronic exposure to UV-B, but up-regulated after acute exposure to UV-B [77].

    3.5. Anthocyanin Content

    Anthocyanins are a major class of phenols with multiple health benefits. Light-modulated anthocyanin production in plants has been studied by many authors, and UV light is known to play an important role in the anthocyanin biosynthesis pathway [78]. An experiment carried out by Su et al. [79] showed that UV-B at 5 W m−2 induced anthocyanin biosynthesis, with a time-dependent increase. This is in line with the findings of Solovchenko et al. [80] in apple (Malus domestica) skin, Wang et al. [78] in turnip (Brassica rapa) seedlings, and Tsurunaga et al. [49] in Triticum sprouts. Several studies have shown that PAL plays an important role in anthocyanin accumulation under UV-B irradiation [81][82]. When plants are exposed to a stressing environment, stored information is used to develop “memory” for future resistance [83]. This phenomenon was also observed for UV-B exposure: indeed, when light exposure was stopped, production of anthocyanin did not stop at the same time but continued to increase for more than six hours; the same was observed for PAL activity [79]. The above findings suggest that UV light enrichment can improve the nutritional quality of crops by enhancing production of healthy compounds. However, more research into the effects of UV treatment under closed conditions, such as in plant nurseries, is needed [47].

    The entry is from 10.3390/horticulturae7010009

    References

    1. Loconsole, D.; Murillo-Amador, B.; Cristiano, G.; De Lucia, B. Halophyte common ice plants: A future solution to arable land salinization. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6076.
    2. Okayama, T.; Okamura, K.; Park, J.-E.; Ushada, M.; Murase, H. A simulation for precision airflow control using multi-fan in a plant factory. Environ. Control Biol. 2008, 46, 183–194.
    3. Darko, E.; Heydarizadeh, P.; Schoefs, B.; Sabzalian, M.R. Photosynthesis under artificial light: The shift in primary and sec-ondary metabolism. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2014, 369, 20130243.
    4. Ouzounis, T.; Rosenqvist, E.; Ottosen, C.-O. Spectral effects of artificial light on plant physiology and Secondary Metabo-lism: A review. HortScience 2015, 50, 1128–1135.
    5. Hytönen, T.; Pinho, P.; Rantanen, M.; Kariluoto, S.; Lampi, A.; Edelmann, M.; Joensuu, K.; Kauste, K.; Mouhu, K.; Piironen, V.; et al. Effects of LED light spectra on lettuce growth and nutritional composition. Light. Res. Technol. 2018, 50, 880–893.
    6. Pawłowska, B.; Żupnik, M.; Szewczyk-Taranek, B.; Cioć, M. Impact of LED light sources on morphogenesis and levels of photosynthetic pigments in Gerbera jamesonii grown in vitro. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 2018, 59, 115–123.
    7. Joshi, N.C.; Ratner, K.; Eidelman, O.; Bednarczyk, D.; Zur, N.; Many, Y.; Shahak, Y.; Aviv-Sharon, E.; Achiam, M.; Gilad, Z.; et al. Effects of daytime intra-canopy LED illumination on photosynthesis and productivity of bell pepper grown in protected cultivation. Sci. Hortic. (Amst.) 2019, 250, 81–88.
    8. Jenkins, G.I. Signal Transduction in responses to UV-B radiation. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2009, 60, 407–431.
    9. Vass, I.; Turcsányi, E.; Touloupakis, E.; Ghanotakis, D.; Petrouleas, V. The mechanism of UV-A radiation-induced inhibition of photosystem II electron transport studied by EPR and chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochemistry 2002, 41, 10200–10208.
    10. Prado, F.E.; Rosa, M.; Prado, C.; Podazza, G.; Interdonato, R.; González, J.A.; Hilal, M. UV-B radiation, its effects and defense mechanisms in terrestrial plants. In Environmental Adaptations and Stress Tolerance of Plants in the Era of Climate Change; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 57–83, ISBN 9781461408154.
    11. Takahashi, S.; Badger, M.R. Photoprotection in plants: A new light on photosystem II damage. Trends Plant Sci. 2011, 16, 53–60.
    12. Nawkar, G.; Maibam, P.; Park, J.; Sahi, V.; Lee, S.; Kang, C. UV-induced cell death in plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 1608–1628.
    13. Kosobryukhov, A.A.; Lyubimov, V.Y.; Kreslavski, V.D. Adaptive mechanisms of photosynthetic apparatus to UV radiation. In Stress Responses in Plants; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 59–78, ISBN 9783319133683.
    14. Heijde, M.; Ulm, R. UV-B photoreceptor-mediated signalling in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2012, 17, 230–237.
    15. Kim, B.C.; Tennessen, D.J.; Last, R.L. UV-B-induced photomorphogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1998, 15, 667–674.
    16. Ulm, R.; Nagy, F. Signalling and gene regulation in response to ultraviolet light. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2005, 8, 477–482.
    17. Rizzini, L.; Favory, J.-J.; Cloix, C.; Faggionato, D.; O’Hara, A.; Kaiserli, E.; Baumeister, R.; Schafer, E.; Nagy, F.; Jenkins, G.I.; et al. Perception of UV-B by the Arabidopsis UVR8 protein. Science 2011, 332, 103–106.
    18. Favory, J.J.; Stec, A.; Gruber, H.; Rizzini, L.; Oravecz, A.; Funk, M.; Albert, A.; Cloix, C.; Jenkins, G.I.; Oakeley, E.J.; et al. In-teraction of COP1 and UVR8 regulates UV-B-induced photomorphogenesis and stress acclimation in Arabidopsis. EMBO J. 2009, 28, 591–601.
    19. Balestrazzi, A.; Locato, V.; Bottone, M.G.; De Gara, L.; Biggiogera, M.; Pellicciari, C.; Botti, S.; Di Gesù, D.; Donà, M.; Carbonera, D. Response to UV-C radiation in topo I-deficient carrot cells with low ascorbate levels. J. Exp. Bot. 2010, 61, 575–585.
    20. Saxena, S.; Joshi, P.; Grimm, B.; Arora, S. Alleviation of ultraviolet-C-induced oxidative damage through overexpression of cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase. Biologia 2011, 66, 1052.
    21. Urban, L.; Sari, D.C.; Orsal, B.; Lopes, M.; Miranda, R.; Aarrouf, J. UV-C light and pulsed light as alternatives to chemical and biological elicitors for stimulating plant natural defenses against fungal diseases. Sci. Hortic. (Amst.) 2018, 235, 452–459.
    22. Suzuki, N.; Mittler, R. Reactive oxygen species and temperature stresses: A delicate balance between signaling and destruc-tion. Physiol. Plant. 2006, 126, 45–51.
    23. Urban, L.; Charles, F.; de Miranda, M.R.A.; Aarrouf, J. Understanding the physiological effects of UV-C light and exploiting its agronomic potential before and after harvest. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 105, 1–11.
    24. World Health Organization. Protection against Exposure to Ultraviolet Radiation; World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzer-land: 2001.
    25. Tezuka, T.; Hotta, T.; Watanabe, I. Growth promotion of tomato and radish plants by solar UV radiation reaching the Earth’s surface. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 1993, 19, 61–66.
    26. Cooley, N.; Higgins, J.; Holmes, M.; Attridge, T. Ecotypic differences in responses of Arabidopsis thaliana L. to elevated polychromatic UV-A and UV-B+A radiation in the natural environment: A positive correlation between UV-B+A inhibition and growth rate. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2001, 60, 143–150.
    27. Kataria, S.; Guruprasad, K.N.; Ahuja, S.; Singh, B. Enhancement of growth, photosynthetic performance and yield by exclu-sion of ambient UV components in C3 and C4 plants. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2013, 127, 140–152.
    28. Bernal, M.; Llorens, L.; Badosa, J.; Verdaguer, D. Interactive effects of UV radiation and water availability on seedlings of six woody Mediterranean species. Physiol. Plant. 2013, 147, 234–247.
    29. Bernal, M.; Verdaguer, D.; Badosa, J.; Abadía, A.; Llusià, J.; Peñuelas, J.; Núñez-Olivera, E.; Llorens, L. Effects of enhanced UV radiation and water availability on performance, biomass production and photoprotective mechanisms of Laurus nobilis seedlings. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2015, 109, 264–275.
    30. Verdaguer, D.; Jansen, M.A.K.; Llorens, L.; Morales, L.O.; Neugart, S. UV-A radiation effects on higher plants: Exploring the known unknown. Plant Sci. 2017, 255, 72–81.
    31. Krizek, D.T.; Mirecki, R.M.; Britz, S.J. Inhibitory effects of ambient levels of solar UV-A and UV-B radiation on growth of cucumber. Physiol. Plantarum. 1997, 100, 886–893.
    32. Häder, D.P. Effects of solar radiation on local and German wheat seedlings in a Chilean high mountain station. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 1996, 35, 181–187.
    33. Zhang, L.; Allen, L.H.; Vaughan, M.M.; Hauser, B.A.; Boote, K.J. Solar ultraviolet radiation exclusion increases soybean in-ternode lengths and plant height. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2014, 184, 170–178.
    34. Hou, F.J.; Ben, G.Y. Effect of UV-B radiation on physiological properties in soybean and cucumber seedlings. Chin. J. Appl. Environ. Biol. 1999, 5, 455–458.
    35. Sun, L.H.; Li, Z.H.; Duan, L.S.; Wei, Z.G.; Wang, Q. Effect of UV-B radiation on the growth and photosynthesis of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) seedlings. Acta Agric. Boreali-Sin. 2006, 21, 79–82.
    36. Rybus-Zając, M.; Kubiś, J. Effect of UV-B radiation on antioxidative enzyme activity in cucumber cotyledons. Acta Biol. Crac. Ser. Bot. 2010, 52, 97–102.
    37. Liu, P.; Li, Q.; Li, Y.; Yu, H.; Jiang, W. Effect of UV-B radiation treatments on growth, physiology and antioxidant systems of cucumber seedlings in artificial climate chamber. Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao/Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2017, 33, 181–186.
    38. Darras, A.I.; Tsikaloudakis, G.; Lycoskoufis, I.; Dimitriadis, C.; Karamousantas, D. Low doses of UV-C irradiation affects growth, fruit yield and photosynthetic activity of tomato plants. Sci. Hortic. 2020, 267, 109357.
    39. Darras, A.I.; Demopoulos, V.; Tiniakou, C. UV-C irradiation induces defence responses and improves vase-life of cut ger-bera flowers. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2012, 64, 168–174.
    40. Darras, A.I.; Bali, I.; Argyropoulou, E. Disease resistance and growth responses in Pelargonium×hortorum plants to brief pulses of UV-C irradiation. Sci. Hortic. (Amst.) 2015, 181, 95–101.
    41. Darras, A.I.; Vlachodimitropoulou, A.; Dimitriadis, C. Regulation of corm sprouting, growth and flowering of pot Freesia hybrida L. plants by cold and UV-C irradiation forcing. Sci. Hortic. (Amst.) 2019, 252, 110–112.
    42. Bridgen, M. Using ultraviolet-c light as a plant growth regulator©. Acta Hortic. 2015, 1085, 167–169.
    43. Vàsquez, H.; Ouhibi, C.; Lizzi, Y.; Azzouz, N.; Forges, M.; Bardin, M.; Nicot, P.; Urban, L.; Aarrouf, J. Pre-harvest hormetic doses of UV-C radiation can decrease susceptibility of lettuce leaves (Lactuca sativa L.) to Botrytis cinerea L. Sci. Hortic. (Amst.) 2017, 222, 32–39.
    44. de Oliveira, I.R.; Crizel, G.R.; Severo, J.; Renard, C.M.G.C.; Chaves, F.C.; Rombaldi, C.V. Preharvest UV-C radiation influ-ences physiological, biochemical, and transcriptional changes in strawberry cv. Camarosa. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 108, 391–399.
    45. Götz, M.; Albert, A.; Stich, S.; Heller, W.; Scherb, H.; Krins, A.; Langebartels, C.; Seidlitz, H.K.; Ernst, D. PAR modulation of the UV-dependent levels of flavonoid metabolites in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. leaf rosettes: Cumulative effects after a whole vegetative growth period. Protoplasma 2010, 243, 95–103.
    46. Lee, M.J.; Son, J.E.; Oh, M.M. Growth and phenolic content of sowthistle grown in a closed-type plant production system with a UV-A or UV-B lamp. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 2013, 54, 492–500.
    47. Lee, M.J.; Son, J.E.; Oh, M.M. Growth and phenolic compounds of Lactuca sativa L. grown in a closed-type plant production system with UV-A, -B, or -C lamp. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2014, 94, 197–204.
    48. Wang, H.; Gui, M.; Tian, X.; Xin, X.; Wang, T.; Li, J. Effects of UV-B on vitamin C, phenolics, flavonoids and their related en-zyme activities in mung bean sprouts (Vigna radiata). Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 52, 827–833.
    49. Tsurunaga, Y.; Takahashi, T.; Katsube, T.; Kudo, A.; Kuramitsu, O.; Ishiwata, M.; Matsumoto, S. Effects of UV-B irradiation on the levels of anthocyanin, rutin and radical scavenging activity of buckwheat sprouts. Food Chem. 2013, 141, 552–556.
    50. Castagna, A.; Chiavaro, E.; Dall’Asta, C.; Rinaldi, M.; Galaverna, G.; Ranieri, A. Effect of postharvest UV-B irradiation on nutraceutical quality and physical properties of tomato fruits. Food Chem. 2013, 137, 151–158.
    51. Namlı, S.; Işıkalan, Ç.; Akbaş, F.; Toker, Z.; Tilkat, E.A. Effects of UV-B radiation on total phenolic, flavonoid and hypericin contents in Hypericum retusum Aucher grown under in vitro conditions. Nat. Prod. Res. 2014, 28, 2286–2292.
    52. Rozema, J.; Björn, L.; Bornman, J.; Gaberščik, A.; Häder, D.-P.; Trošt, T.; Germ, M.; Klisch, M.; Gröniger, A.; Sinha, R.; et al. The role of UV-B radiation in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems—An experimental and functional analysis of the evolution of UV-absorbing compounds. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2002, 66, 2–12.
    53. Cerovic, Z.G.; Ounis, A.; Cartelat, A.; Latouche, G.; Goulas, Y.; Meyer, S.; Moya, I. The use of chlorophyll fluorescence exci-tation spectra for the non-destructive in situ assessment of UV-absorbing compounds in leaves. Plant. Cell Environ. 2002, 25, 1663–1676.
    54. Kotilainen, T.; Tegelberg, R.; Julkunen-Tiitto, R.; Lindfors, A.; Aphalo, P.J. Metabolite specific effects of solar UV-A and UV-B on alder and birch leaf phenolics. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2008, 14, 1294–1304.
    55. Kotilainen, T.; Venäläinen, T.; Tegelberg, R.; Lindfors, A.; Julkunen-Tiitto, R.; Sutinen, S.; O’Hara, R.B.; Aphalo, P.J. Assess-ment of UV biological spectral weighting functions for phenolic metabolites and growth responses in silver birch seed-lings. Photochem. Photobiol. 2009, 85, 1346–1355.
    56. Ibdah, M.; Krins, A.; Seidlitz, H.K.; Heller, W.; Strack, D.; Vogt, T. Spectral dependence of flavonol and betacyanin accumu-lation in Mesembryanthemum crystallinum under enhanced ultraviolet radiation. Plant. Cell Environ. 2002, 25, 1145–1154.
    57. Morales, L.O.; Tegelberg, R.; Brosche, M.; Keinanen, M.; Lindfors, A.; Aphalo, P.J. Effects of solar UV-A and UV-B radiation on gene expression and phenolic accumulation in Betula pendula leaves. Tree Physiol. 2010, 30, 923–934.
    58. Lavola, A.; Aphalo, P.J.; Lahti, M.; Julkunen-Tiitto, R. Nutrient availability and the effect of increasing UV-B radiation on secondary plant compounds in Scots pine. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2003, 49, 49–60.
    59. Nenadis, N.; Llorens, L.; Koufogianni, A.; Díaz, L.; Font, J.; Gonzalez, J.A.; Verdaguer, D. Interactive effects of UV radiation and reduced precipitation on the seasonal leaf phenolic content/composition and the antioxidant activity of naturally growing Arbutus unedo plants. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2015, 153, 435–444.
    60. Trivellini, A.; Lucchesini, M.; Maggini, R.; Mosadegh, H.; Villamarin, T.S.S.; Vernieri, P.; Mensuali-Sodi, A.; Pardossi, A. La-miaceae phenols as multifaceted compounds: Bioactivity, industrial prospects and role of “positive-stress.” Ind. Crops Prod. 2016, 83, 241–254.
    61. Schreiner, M.; Martínez-Abaigar, J.; Glaab, J.; Jansen, M. UV-B induced secondary plant metabolites: Potential benefits for plant and human health. Optik Photonik 2014, 9, 34–37.
    62. Murthy, H.N.; Lee, E.-J.; Paek, K.Y. Production of secondary metabolites from cell and organ cultures: Strategies and ap-proaches for biomass improvement and metabolite accumulation. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2014, 118, 1–16.
    63. Lee, C.J.; Chen, L.G.; Chang, T.L.; Ke, W.M.; Lo, Y.F.; Wang, C.C. The correlation between skin-care effects and phytochemi-cal contents in Lamiaceae plants. Food Chem. 2011, 124, 833–841.
    64. Ramos, M.; Jiménez, A.; Peltzer, M.; Garrigós, M.C. Characterization and antimicrobial activity studies of polypropylene films with carvacrol and thymol for active packaging. J. Food Eng. 2012, 109, 513–519.
    65. Khaled-Khodja, N.; Boulekbache-Makhlouf, L.; Madani, K. Phytochemical screening of antioxidant and antibacterial activi-ties of methanolic extracts of some Lamiaceae. Ind. Crops Prod. 2014, 61, 41–48.
    66. Bertoli, A.; Lucchesini, M.; Mensuali-Sodi, A.; Leonardi, M.; Doveri, S.; Magnabosco, A.; Pistelli, L. Aroma characterisation and UV elicitation of purple basil from different plant tissue cultures. Food Chem. 2013, 141, 776–787.
    67. Ghasemzadeh, A.; Ashkani, S.; Baghdadi, A.; Pazoki, A.; Jaafar, H.; Rahmat, A. Improvement in flavonoids and phenolic ac-ids production and pharmaceutical quality of sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) by ultraviolet-B irradiation. Molecules 2016, 21, 1203.
    68. Escobar, A.L.; de Oliveira Silva, F.M.; Acevedo, P.; Nunes-Nesi, A.; Alberdi, M.; Reyes-Díaz, M. Different levels of UV-B re-sistance in Vaccinium corymbosum cultivars reveal distinct backgrounds of phenylpropanoid metabolites. Plant Physiol. Bi-ochem. 2017, 118, 541–550.
    69. Mosadegh, H.; Trivellini, A.; Ferrante, A.; Lucchesini, M.; Vernieri, P.; Mensuali, A. Applications of UV-B lighting to en-hance phenolic accumulation of sweet basil. Sci. Hortic. (Amst.) 2018, 229, 107–116.
    70. Von Lintig, J.; Welsch, R.; Bonk, M.; Giuliano, G.; Batschauer, A.; Kleinig, H. Light-dependent regulation of carotenoid bio-synthesis occurs at the level of phytoene synthase expression and is mediated by phytochrome in Sinapis alba and Ara-bidopsis thaliana seedlings. Plant J. 1997, 12, 625–634.
    71. Abeles, F.B.; Morgan, P.W.; Saltveit, M.E. Ethylene in Plant Biology, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1992.
    72. A.-H.-Mackerness, S.; Surplus, S.L.; Blake, P.; John, C.F.; Buchanan-Wollaston, V.; Jordan, B.R.; Thomas, B. Ultravio-let-B-induced stress and changes in gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana: Role of signalling pathways controlled by jasmonic acid, ethylene and reactive oxygen species. Plant. Cell Environ. 1999, 22, 1413–1423.
    73. Nara, A.; Takeuchi, Y. Ethylene evolution from tobacco leaves irradiated with UV-B. J. Plant Res. 2002, 115, 247–253.
    74. Predieri, S. Influence of UV-B radiation on membrane lipid composition and ethylene evolution in “Doyenne d’Hiver” pear shoots grown in vitro under different photosynthetic photon fluxes. Environ. Exp. Bot. 1995, 35, 151–160.
    75. Giuntini, D.; Graziani, G.; Lercari, B.; Fogliano, V.; Soldatini, G.F.; Ranieri, A. Changes in carotenoid and ascorbic acid con-tents in fruits of different tomato genotypes related to the depletion of UV-B radiation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 3174–3181.
    76. Becatti, E.; Petroni, K.; Giuntini, D.; Castagna, A.; Calvenzani, V.; Serra, G.; Mensuali-Sodi, A.; Tonelli, C.; Ranieri, A. Solar UV−B radiation influences carotenoid accumulation of tomato fruit through both ethylene-dependent and -independent mechanisms. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 10979–10989.
    77. Hectors, K.; Prinsen, E.; De Coen, W.; Jansen, M.A.K.; Guisez, Y. Arabidopsis thaliana plants acclimated to low dose rates of ultraviolet B radiation show specific changes in morphology and gene expression in the absence of stress symptoms. New Phytol. 2007, 175, 255–270.
    78. Wang, Y.; Zhou, B.; Sun, M.; Li, Y.; Kawabata, S. UV-A light induces anthocyanin biosynthesis in a manner distinct from synergistic blue + UV-B light and UV-A/blue light responses in different parts of the hypocotyls in turnip seedlings. Plant Cell Physiol. 2012, 53, 1470–1480.
    79. Su, N.; Lu, Y.; Wu, Q.; Liu, Y.; Xia, Y.; Xia, K.; Cui, J. UV-B-induced anthocyanin accumulation in hypocotyls of radish sprouts continues in the dark after irradiation. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2016, 96, 886–892.
    80. Solovchenko, A. Significance of skin flavonoids for UV-B-protection in apple fruits. J. Exp. Bot. 2003, 54, 1977–1984.
    81. Park, W.T.; Kim, Y.B.; Seo, J.M.; Kim, S.-J.; Chung, E.; Lee, J.-H.; Park, S.U. Accumulation of anthocyanin and associated gene expression in radish sprouts exposed to light and methyl jasmonate. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 4127–4132.
    82. Su, N.; Wu, Q.; Liu, Y.; Cai, J.; Shen, W.; Xia, K.; Cui, J. Hydrogen-rich water reestablishes ROS homeostasis but exerts dif-ferential effects on anthocyanin synthesis in two varieties of radish sprouts under UV-A irradiation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 6454–6462.
    83. Bruce, T.J.A.; Matthes, M.C.; Napier, J.A.; Pickett, J.A. Stressful “memories” of plants: Evidence and possible mechanisms. Plant Sci. 2007, 173, 603–608.
    More
    1. Please check and comment entries here.