1. Please check and comment entries here.
Table of Contents

    Topic review

    PLBs organogenesis in orchid

    Submitted by: Hasan Mehraj


    A protocorm-like structure those are generated from the vegetative explant in vitro, are known as protocorm like body (PLB). For the mass propagation of plant, PLBs regeneration is one of the key focusing. Orchid is the largest genus of the flowering plants and they have number of commercially important genus. Orchids are difficult to propagate by seeds and vegetative propagation methods. In vitro propagation is the most efficient technique for the orchid propagation. Induction and proliferation of PLBs can accelerate their propagation by reduce the time and costs. It is possible to propagate numerous numbers of plants within short period of time with low costs from PLBs. Researchers are trying to develop efficient PLBs induction and proliferation techniques using different plant growth regulators, carbon sources, and light emitting diodes. Here, we are discussing about the progress of the PLBs organogenesis in orchids.

    Orchids have a huge demand in flower market as cut and pot flower, it belongs to Orchidaceae family with approximately 900 genera, about 27,800 accepted species and over 100,000 hybrids[1][2]. Orchidaceae family is enriched with more than 10 new genera on an average in each year[1] whereas only few genera are popular, and these are Cattleya, Cymbidium, Dendrobium, Oncidium, Phalaenopsis and Vanda. Only these few genera are considered as the most important genus for commercial cut and pot flower, most of the research are focused on these genera while rest of the genera are still underestimated. It can be propagated sexually by seeds or, asexually by vegetative propagation. Though orchids can produce a huge quantity of seeds but more than 99.7% does not have any functional endosperm[3], while vegetative propagation require a long period and the quality of the flower from vegetatively propagated seedling deteriorate. So, like other flowering plants, orchids are also not easy to regenerate by seeds or from their vegetative propagation. In vitro culture is an effective technique to propagate such plants[4]. Proliferation of the protocorm like bodies (PLBs) is one of most efficient techniques for orchid micropropagation. PLBs are triggered from explants or, calluses or, both[5]. Callus cells form compact regions during PLBs development (meristemoids[6]), and this compact region initiates polarized growth starts from the surface cells. PLBs then generate anterior smaller cells (shoot pole which generates first leaf) and posterior larger cell by continuous cell division[6][7]. PLBs organogenesis is also considered as somatic embryogenesis[6][8], and for that reason, PLBs regeneration is a routine practice for commercial orchid production to produce clonal plantlets[9]. Though several studies have already been conducted for the PLBs organogenesis of the dissimilar orchid genus, nonetheless it needs more studies for the effective PLBs organogenesis of orchids.

    Protocorm like bodies (PLBs) and their organogenesis
    A protocorm (embryo derived ) alike structure those are generated from the vegetative explant in vitro, and these are known as protocorm like bodies[5]. A compact region composed with meristemoids is firstly form during PLB organogenesis, thereafter, it starts the polarized growth from the surface cell of each compact pool of meristemoids; and then cell division creates the shoot pole of a PLB, and a posterior larger and vacuolated cells is also formed at the base of PLB[6]. Shoot pole leads to the leaf development and base of the PLB leads for the root development. However, root initiation can also be occurred from the middle or bottom of the PLB[7]. From single explant, numerous numbers of PLBs can be generated which can be further multiplied by separation, and each single PLB would be lead to the development of a single plantlet.
    It can be generated from different plant parts such as shoot tips, root tips, buds of the flower stalks, nodal segments, leaf segments etc. PLBs organogenesis is aim for the mass propagation of plants in vitro. PLBs proliferation that can be influenced by several factors such as growing media, growing conditions, genetic materials etc.[10][11]. Murashige and Skoog (MS) is commonly used medium for in vitro. Plant regeneration or PLBs proliferation can be improved by the properly modified MS medium and culture condition; and this manipulation is plant specific[12][13]. This can fasten the micro-propagation process and improve the quality of regenerated plantlets as well. Medium can be modified by several ways such as alteration of the carbon sources, addition of the growth regulators or, elicitor. The requirement of plant growth regulators varies from species to species and explant to explant.

    PLBs proliferation by dissimilar carbon sources
    Carbon source is the basic ingredient for the in vitro culture media, where sucrose is widely used as the universal carbon sources irrespective to plant species for the plantlet generation and PLBs organogenesis as well. Besides, there are some efficient carbon sources such as glucose, fructose, maltose, sorbitol, manitol etc. are found as effective for the PLBs organogenesis in orchids; however, the efficiency of the carbon sources for the PLB organogenesis is highly plant specific[14][15]. We found that sucrose and trehalose both are equally acted as efficient carbon sources for the PLBs proliferation of Phalaenopsis[15].

    Growth regulators and elicitors for PLBs organogenesis
    In general, two main groups of plant growth hormones, cytokinins and auxins, are commonly used in orchid culture media, their types, concentration, and combinations are critically important. Plant growth regulators (PGRs) such as indol-3-acetic acid (IAA), indol-3-butyric acid (IBA), 1-naphthylacetic acid (NAA), 6-Benzyladenine (BA), 6-Benzylaminopurin (BAP), thidiazuron (TDZ) etc. are widely used in vitro micro-propagation, and their role for the in vitro plant growth and development has already been identified in various plants[16]. However, auxins, especially NAA affect the process of regeneration in monopodial epiphytic species; they act synergistically on the formation of PLBs[9]. On the other hand, a lower NAA and BA ratio in the culture medium was induced the formation of PLBs on rhizomes of Cymbidium kanran[17], and their higher ratio was effective in Spathoglottis plicata[18], However, lower NAA and BA ratio can results the slow development of plantlets from  PLBs[17]. TDZ is comparatively less used chemicals for the manipulation of basal MS medium, and it was found as an effective plant growth media modifier to induce PLBs and their subsequent proliferation Dendrobium, Vanda, Oncidium and Phalaenopsis[19][20][21][22], it is considered as a diversified growth regulator[23]. However, the use of higher concentration of TDZ is sometimes associated with morphological abnormalities as has been reported in several species[24][25]. Chitosan also plays singnificant role for the in vitro PLBs organogenesis[26]. Hyaluronic acid (HA), a polymer of disaccharides, could be a potential growth regulator for the PLBs proliferation in vitro, and it has diverse functions according to their molecular weight such as HA9, HA12, HA20 etc. However, PLB organogenesis of different orchid genus or even species would have independent response against each forms of HA[27][28][29]. 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) is known plant growth regulator for the increasing plant growth and yield that generally increase the carbon and nitroge assimilation, chlorophyll content, photosynthesis process by the exogenous application[30][31][32]. Recently, it has been used for the PLBs organogenesis in orchid and found as an effective plant growth regulator for PLBs proliferation in orchids[33].
    Growth retardants like chlorocholine chloride (CCC: (2-chloroethyl) trimethyl-ammonium chloride) can be used for the in vitro plant micro-propagation, and it can influence on plant growth and development[15][34] by inhibiting the biosynthesis of gibberellic acid[35][36]. Lysozymes (N-acetylmuramoylhydrolases) has found in many organisms that has the capability to defend plant against infection. It can act as an elicitor on in vitro propagation[37][38][39]. Similar to lysozyme, methyl jasmonate (MeJa) is associated with plant defense[40] and growth inhibition rather than promotion[41]. It can alter physiological responses in plants thus make a plant in more organized form by reducing the growth unwanted parts. It is an elicitor for secondary metabolite production in vitro micro-propagation[42][43], and can improve PLBs formation[38][44]. Lysozyme is considered a “natural” antibiotic[45][46], is an elicitor; and it could be an important factor to initiate PLBs. PLBs of orchids can well proliferated by dipping 30 minutes into lysozyme aqueous solution[47]. MeJA is a volatile derivative of jasmonic acid[48], MeJA or JA acts as an elicitor in the culture media to enhance the anthocyanin production[49]. MeJA has successfully used as an elicitor in other plant species for enhancing the production of secondary metabolites like anthocyanin in cell cultures[50][51][52][53]. MeJA (@1 μM) stimulates protocorm like body and shoot formation in epiphytic and terrestrial Cymbidum[54], while it stimulated PLB formation from half-moon PLBs and PLB TCLs in a hybrid Cymbidium (@1 mg/l)[44].

    PLB proliferation under light emitting diodes (LEDs)
    Efficiency of PLBs production and shorten the culture period is an important task in recent year. Culture condition can manipulate by altering the light color and intensity, and that can significantly fasten the culture period and PLBs proliferation as well. However, It has been reported different culture media and growth conditions manipulation for PLBs organogenesis in orchids[15][55][56][57][58][59]. Plant can respond well to a wide spectrum of light in terms of plant growth and development with wavelengths of <400 nm (UV radiation), 400-700 nm (visible) and 700-800 nm (far-red)[60]. White fluorescent light with spectral emission of 350-750 nm wavelengths generally used as a light source in plant In vitro culture. Now a days, several studies reported that LEDs are the most efficient over white fluorescent light[61]. Plants do not need the all spectral of light for their growth and development, and their absorption is highly plant specific. LED provides the extra advantage by emitting narrower wavelength than the traditional light, that can be selected for the plant specific requirements[62][63]. In general, blue and red light spectrum are essential for plant growth and development[64][65][66][67], and most of the studies focuses on these two light while efficiency of other light spectrum can not be underestimated. 
    Red and blue LEDs combinations was reported as effective for the growth and development of PLBs in Cymbidium, Doritaenopsis, Phalaenopsis, and Calanthe[61][64]. Blue LED increase shoot formation of PLB cultures in D. officinale and D. kingianum[67][68]. Red LED shows the lowest differentiation rate vise versa in blue LED for the in vitro PLBs proliferation of orchids[69][67], and it can be beneficial for the accumulation of more carbohydrate during PLB proliferation[70].  A mixture of red plus blue light, and red LED alone, enhanced both plant growth and development by increasing the net photosynthesis[71]. This is because the spectral energy distribution of red and blue light coincided with that of chlorophyll absorption[72]. In contrast, there is very little information for effect of monochromatic yellow and green LED on growth and environmental factors of plants. Yellow LED has also the potentiality for the early PLBs proliferation[73], and the green LEDs would have similar potentiality for the PLB proliferation of orchids.

    Combination of more than one factors
    Combination of the different PLBs organogenesis showed the better potentiality for their proliferation and fresh weight in orchids. Recent years, researchers are sorted out the combination of carbon sources, growth regulators, growth retardants, elicitors, and light emitting diodes. Recently, we have studied LEDs combined with different carbon sources for the PLBs proliferation of Phalaenopsis, we compared the PLBs proliferation under monochromatic lights those were combined with different carbon sources[15].  We found three different combinations for the efficient PLBs proliferation of Phalaenopsis, and these are Red-White-sucrose (PLBs were cultured first half of the culture period under red LED and last half of the culture period under white LED, and the culture media was supplied with sucrose as carbon sources), Blue-White-trehalose (PLBs were cultured first half of the culture period under blueLED and last half of the culture period under white LED, and the culture media was supplied with trehalose as carbon sources), Red-Blue-White-trehalose (PLBs were cultured first 1/3 of the culture period under red LED, then 1/3 of the culture period under blue LED and last 1/3 of the culture period under white LED; and the culture media was supplied with trehalose as carbon sources)[15]. Our results notified that, LEDs for the PLBs proliferation not only plant specific, but also the growing stage specific. Red-White-sucrose, Blue-White-trehalose and Red-Blue-White-trehalose combinations notified that Phalaenopsis need red and/or blue LED at the primary period of their PLBs culture and thereafter it needs the white LED. However, Red-White-sucrose and Blue-White-trehalose combinations suggested that sucrose respond well as carbon sources under red light, while trehalose can supplied more carbon for the PLBs proliferation under blue LED.

    Finally, PLBs propagation is the best way for the mass propagation of orchids, however, the efficient PLBs propagation techniques need to disclose. From the previous studies, it was clear that PLBs proliferation in orchids is plant specific, and each orchid species respond differently to the carbon sources, plant growth regulators, plant growth retardants, elicitors, and light emitting diodes.


    1. Mark W. Chase; Kenneth M. Cameron; John V. Freudenstein; Alec M. Pridgeon; Gerardo Salazar; Cássio Van Den Berg; André Schuiteman; An updated classification of Orchidaceae. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 2015, 177, 151-174, 10.1111/boj.12234.
    2. Jean Carlos Cardoso; Cesar Augusto Zanello; Jen-Tsung Chen; An Overview of Orchid Protocorm-Like Bodies: Mass Propagation, Biotechnology, Molecular Aspects, and Breeding. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2020, 21, 985, 10.3390/ijms21030985.
    3. Arditti, J. Fundamentals of orchid biology; John Wiley & Sons: New York, USA, 1992; pp. 1-691.
    4. Udomporn Petchthai; Anchalee Chuphrom; Pattana S. Huehne; Recovery of virus-infected Dendrobium orchids by constitutive expression of the cymbidium mosaic virus coat protein gene. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) 2014, 120, 597-606, 10.1007/s11240-014-0626-x.
    5. Samira Chugh; Satyakam Guha; I. Usha Rao; Micropropagation of orchids: A review on the potential of different explants. Scientia Horticulturae 2009, 122, 507-520, 10.1016/j.scienta.2009.07.016.
    6. Yung-I Lee; Shan-Te Hsu; Edward C. Yeung; Orchid protocorm-like bodies are somatic embryos. American Journal of Botany 2013, 100, 2121-2131, 10.3732/ajb.1300193.
    7. Pou-Ieng Hong; Jen-Tsung Chen; Wei-Chin Chang; Plant regeneration via protocorm-like body formation and shoot multiplication from seed-derived callus of a maudiae type slipper orchid. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 2008, 30, 755-759, 10.1007/s11738-008-0158-2.
    8. Peng Zhao; Fei Wu; Fo-Sheng Feng; Wanjun Wang; Protocorm-like body (PLB) formation and plant regeneration from the callus culture of Dendrobium candidum Wall ex Lindl.. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant 2008, 44, 178-185, 10.1007/s11627-007-9101-2.
    9. Tim W. Yam; Joseph Arditti; History of orchid propagation: a mirror of the history of biotechnology. Plant Biotechnology Reports 2009, 3, 1-56, 10.1007/s11816-008-0066-3.
    10. Zulfiqar B, Abbasi NA, Ahmad T, Hafiz IA. 2009. Effect of explant sources and different concentrations of plant growth regulators on in vitro shoot proliferation and rooting of Avocado (Persea americana MILL.) cv. 'Fuerte'. Pak J Bot, 41: 2333−2346.
    11. Michel Z, Hilaire KT, Mongomake K, Georges AN, Justin KY. 2008. Effect of genotype, explants, growth regulators and sugars on callus induction in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Aust J Crop Sci, 2: 1-9.
    12. Shilpa S. Madke; Konglanth J. Cherian; Rupesh S. Badere; A modified Murashige and Skoog media for efficient multipleshoot induction in G. arborea Roxb.. Journal of Forestry Research 2014, 25, 557-564, 10.1007/s11676-014-0449-y.
    13. Shinichi Enoki; Yoshinori Takahara; Application of a Modified MS Medium for Tissue Culture with Cutting in Phalaenopsis-Comparison with Other Conventional Media with Regard to the Survival Rate and Varietal Differences in Cultural Characteristics-. Shokubutsu Kankyo Kogaku 2014, 26, 109-117, 10.2525/shita.26.109.
    14. W. Udomdee; P.J. Wen; S.W. Chin; F.C. Chen; EFFECT OF CARBON SOURCE ON PROTOCORM-LIKE BODY INDUCTION, PROLIFERATION AND REGENERATION IN DENDROBIUM SNOWFLAKE 'RED STAR'. Acta Horticulturae 2015, 1078, 113-120, 10.17660/actahortic.2015.1078.15.
    15. Hasan Mehraj; Meskatul Alam; Sultana Umma Habiba; Hasan Mehbub; LEDs Combined with CHO Sources and CCC Priming PLB Regeneration of Phalaenopsis. Horticulturae 2019, 5, 34, 10.3390/horticulturae5020034.
    16. Dias JPT. 2019. Plant growth regulators in horticulture: practices and perspectives. Biotecnología Vegetal 19: 3 – 14
    17. Kazuhiko Shimasaki; Shunpei Uemoto; Micropropagation of a terrestrial Cymbidium species using rhizomes developed from seeds and pseudobulbs. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) 1990, 22, 237-244, 10.1007/bf00033642.
    18. W.-L. Teng; L. Nicholson; M.-C. Teng; Micropropagation of Spathoglottis plicata. Plant Cell Reports 1997, 16, 831-835, 10.1007/s002990050329.
    19. Chen, JT; Chang, WC; Direct somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from leaf explants of Phalaenopsis amabil. Biologia Plantarum 2006, 50, 169-173, .
    20. Jen-Tsung Chen; Wei-Chin Chang; Effects of auxins and cytokinins on direct somatic embryogenesison leaf explants of Oncidium 'Gower Ramsey’. Plant Growth Regulation 2001, 34, 229-232, 10.1023/a:1013304101647.
    21. Jonojit Roy; Soumi Naha; Madhumita Majumdar; Nirmalya Banerjee; Direct and callus-mediated protocorm-like body induction from shoot-tips of Dendrobium chrysotoxum Lindl. (Orchidaceae). Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) 2007, 90, 31-39, 10.1007/s11240-007-9244-1.
    22. Panjan Sujjaritthurakarn; Kamnoon Kanchanapoom; Efficient Direct Protocorm-Like Bodies Induction of Dwarf Dendrobium using Thidiazuron. Notulae Scientia Biologicae 2011, 3, 88-92, 10.15835/nsb346356.
    23. Guo B; Haider Abbasi Bilal; Zeb Amir; L Xu L; H Wei Y; Thidiazuron: A multi-dimensional plant growth regulator. African Journal of Biotechnology 2011, 10, 8984-9000, 10.5897/ajb11.636.
    24. Carl A. Huetteman; John E. Preece; Thidiazuron: a potent cytokinin for woody plant tissue culture. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) 1993, 33, 105-119, 10.1007/bf01983223.
    25. N.V. Ket; E.J. Hahn; S.Y. Park; D. Chakrabarty; K. -Y. Paek; Micropropagation of an Endangered Orchid Anoectochilus formosanus. Biologia plantarum 2004, 48, 339-344, 10.1023/b:biop.0000041084.77832.11.
    26. Didik Pudji Restanto; Boedi Santoso; Budi Kriswanto; Sigit Supardjono; The Application of Chitosan for Protocorm Like Bodies (PLB) Induction of Orchid (Dendrobium sp) In Vitro. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia 2016, 9, 462-468, 10.1016/j.aaspro.2016.02.164.
    27. Mehraj, Hasan; Shimasaki, Kazuhiko; In vitroPLBs organogenesis of Phalaenopsisusing different concentrations of HA9 and HA12 combination. Journal of Bioscience and Agriculture Research 2017, 12, 1036-1040, .
    28. Sultana, Kazi Sadia; Hasan, Kazi Mustafa; Hasan, Kazi Mehedi; Sultana, Shamima; Mehraj, Hasan; Shimasaki, Kazuhiko; Habiba, Sultana Umma; Effect of Hyaluronic Acid (HA) on Organogenesis in Protocorm-LikeBodies(PLBs) of Phalaenopsis ‘Fmk02010’ Cultured in vitro. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences 2015, 15, 1721-1724, .
    29. S.J. Nahar; K. Shimasaki; EFFECT OF HYALURONIC ACID ON ORGANOGENESIS IN PROTOCORM-LIKE BODY (PLBS) OF SOME CYMBIDIUM SPECIES IN VITRO. Acta Horticulturae 2014, 1025, 237-242, 10.17660/actahortic.2014.1025.34.
    30. Akiko Maruyama-Nakashita; Masami Yokota Hirai; Shigeyuki Funada; Shoichi Fueki; Exogenous application of 5-aminolevulinic acid increases the transcript levels of sulfur transport and assimilatory genes, sulfate uptake, and cysteine and glutathione contents inArabidopsis thaliana. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 2010, 56, 281-288, 10.1111/j.1747-0765.2010.00458.x.
    31. Dave I. Thompson; Trevor J. Edwards; Johannes Staden; Z. J. Zhang; H. Z. Li; Weijun Zhou; Y. Takeuchi; K. Yoneyama; Evaluating asymbiotic seed culture methods and establishing Disa (Orchidaceae) germinability in vitro: relationships, requirements and first-time reports. Plant Growth Regulation 2006, 49, 269–284, 10.1007/s10725-006-0011-9.
    32. Fuli Xu; Effect of 5-aminolevulinic acid on yield and quality of lettuce in sunlit greenhouse. African Journal of Biotechnology 2012, 11, 11591-11594, 10.5897/ajb12.792.
    33. Syeda Jabun Nahar; Kazuhiko Shimasaki; Application of 5-aminolevulinic Acid for the in vitro Micropropagation of Cymbidium as a Potential Novel Plant Regulator. Environment Control in Biology 2014, 52, 117-121, 10.2525/ecb.52.117.
    34. Malgorzata Berova; Zlatko Zlatev; Physiological response and yield of paclobutrazol treated tomato plants (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Plant Growth Regulation 2000, 30, 117-123, 10.1023/a:1006300326975.
    35. Huiqun Wang; Langtao Xiao; Effects of Chlorocholine Chloride on Phytohormones and Photosynthetic Characteristics in Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 2008, 28, 21-27, 10.1007/s00344-008-9069-0.
    36. Huiqun Wang; Hesong Li; Fulai Liu; Langtao Xiao; Chlorocholine chloride application effects on photosynthetic capacity and photoassimilates partitioning in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Scientia Horticulturae 2009, 119, 113-116, 10.1016/j.scienta.2008.07.019.
    37. Mona Quambusch; Anna Maria Pirttilä; Mysore V. Tejesvi; Traud Winkelmann; Melanie Bartsch; Endophytic bacteria in plant tissue culture: differences between easy- and difficult-to-propagate Prunus avium genotypes. Tree Physiology 2014, 34, 524-533, 10.1093/treephys/tpu027.
    38. Syeda JN, Syed MH, Shimasaki K. 2015. Organogenesis of Cymbidium orchid using elicitors. J. Plant Develop. 22: 13 – 20.
    39. Grazia Marino; Valentina Ferrarini; Silvia Giardini; Bruno Biavati; Use of lysozyme for treatment of bacterial contamination in in vitro shoot cultures of fruit plants. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant 2003, 39, 327-331, 10.1079/ivp2002406.
    40. L. Almagro; L. V. Gómez Ros; S. Belchi-Navarro; R. Bru; A. Ros Barcelo ´; Maria Angeles Pedreño; Class III peroxidases in plant defence reactions. Journal of Experimental Botany 2008, 60, 377-390, 10.1093/jxb/ern277.
    41. Izabela Ruduś; Ewa Kępczyñska; Jan Kepczynski; Comparative Efficacy of Abscisic Acid and Methyl Jasmonate for Indirect Somatic Embryogenesis in Medicago sativa L.. Plant Growth Regulation 2006, 48, 1-11, 10.1007/s10725-005-5136-8.
    42. Matthew M. Cousins; Jeffrey W. Adelberg; Short-term and long-term time course studies of turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) microrhizome development in vitro. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) 2008, 93, 283-293, 10.1007/s11240-008-9375-z.
    43. Abraham J.K. Koo; Gregg A. Howe; The wound hormone jasmonate. Phytochemistry 2009, 70, 1571-1580, 10.1016/j.phytochem.2009.07.018.
    44. Jaime A Teixeira Da Silva; Jasmonic Acid, but not Salicylic Acid, Improves PLB Formation of Hybrid Cymbidium. Plant Tissue Culture and Biotechnology 2013, 22, 187-192, 10.3329/ptcb.v22i2.14209.
    45. G. Sava; Pharmacological aspects and therapeutic applications of lysozymes. Experientia Supplementum 1996, 75, 433-449, 10.1007/978-3-0348-9225-4_22.
    46. R Helal; G Bader; M.F. Melzig; Stimulation of lysozyme release by selected microbial preparations.. Die Pharmazie 2012, 67, 564-566, .
    47. Jabun Nahar, Syeda; Mostafizul Haque, Syed; Kazuhiko, Shimasaki; Organogenesis of cymbidium orchid using elicitors. ournal of Plant Development 2015, 22, 13-20, .
    48. Florian Schaller; Andreas Schaller; Annick Stintzi; Biosynthesis and Metabolism of Jasmonates. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 2004, 23, 179-199, 10.1007/s00344-004-0047-x.
    49. M. Saniewski; Artur Miszczak; L. Kawa-Miszczak; E. Węgrzynowicz-Lesiak; K. Miyamoto; J. Ueda; Effects of Methyl Jasmonate on Anthocyanin Accumulation, Ethylene Production, and CO2 Evolution in Uncooled and Cooled Tulip Bulbs. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 1998, 17, 33-37, 10.1007/pl00007009.
    50. Yun-Soo Kim; Eun-Joo Hahn; Hosakatte Niranjana Murthy; Kee-Yoeup Paek; Adventitious root growth and ginsenoside accumulation in Panax ginseng cultures as affected by methyl jasmonate. Biotechnology Letters 2004, 26, 1619-1622, 10.1007/s10529-004-3183-2.
    51. Aoyagi H.; Kobayashi Y.; Yamada K.; Yokoyama M.; Kusakari K.; Tanaka H.; Efficient production of saikosaponins in Bupleurum falcatum root fragments combined with signal transducers. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 2001, 57, 482-488, 10.1007/s002530100819.
    52. N. T. Thanh; H. N. Murthy; K. W. Yu; E. J. Hahn; K. -Y. Paek; Methyl jasmonate elicitation enhanced synthesis of ginsenoside by cell suspension cultures of Panax ginseng in 5-l balloon type bubble bioreactors. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 2004, 67, 197-201, 10.1007/s00253-004-1759-3.
    53. Thanh-Tam Ho; Hosakatte Niranjana Murthy; So-Young Park; Methyl Jasmonate Induced Oxidative Stress and Accumulation of Secondary Metabolites in Plant Cell and Organ Cultures. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2020, 21, 716, 10.3390/ijms21030716.
    54. Kazuhiko Shimasaki; Tatsuya Shiraga; Yasufumi Fukumoto; Effect of Methyl Jasmonate on Organogenesis in Shoot Cultures of Epiphytic and Terrestrial Cymbidium Species. Environment Control in Biology 2003, 41, 179-182, 10.2525/ecb1963.41.179.
    55. Hasan, Mehraj; Kazuhiko Shimasaki; In vitro PLBs organogenesis of Phalaenopsis using different concentrations of HA9 and HA12 combination. Journal of Bioscience and Agriculture Research 2017, 12, 1036-1040, 10.18801/jbar.120217.126.
    56. Sultana Umma Habiba; Monjurul Ahasan; Kazuhiko Shimasaki; Effects of Ethrel on Organogenesis of Protocorm-like bodies in Dendrobium kingianum In vitro. Plant Tissue Culture and Biotechnology 2018, 28, 141-146, 10.3329/ptcb.v28i1.37205.
    57. S.U. Habiba; K. Shimasaki; M.M. Ahasan; A.F.M.J. Uddin; Effect of two bio polysaccharides on organogenesis of PLBs inDendrobium kingianumcultured in vitro. Acta Horticulturae 2017, 1167, 127-132, 10.17660/actahortic.2017.1167.19.
    58. Habiba; SU; Shimasaki, K; Ahasan, MM; Uddin, AFJU; Effect of ethylene precursor 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid and ethylene inhibitor, silver thiosulfateon organogenesis of PLBs in Dendrobium kingianum cultured in vitro. Acta Horticulturae 2017, 1167, 133-138, 10.17660/actahortic.2017.1167.20.
    59. Habiba, SU; Shimasaki, K; Hasan, KM; Mehraj, H; Alam, MM; Sharma, S; Ahasan, MM; Very low and high temperature act as stress factor on organogenesis in Protocorm-Like Bodies (PLBs) of Dendrobium kingianum. World Applied Sciences Journal 2016, 34, 278-282, .
    60. Rajapakse, Nihal C; Shahak, Yosepha. Light-Quality Manipulation by Horticulture Industry; Whitelam, Garry C; Halliday, Karen J;, Eds.; Blackwell Publishing Ltd.: New Jersey, USA, 2007; pp. 290-312.
    61. Hanus-Fajerska E. and R. Wojciechowska. 2017. Impact of Light-Emitting Diodes (LEDs) on Propagation of Orchids in Tissue Culture. Light Emitting Diodes for Agriculture, Chapter 13. Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. pp. 305-320. 10.1007/978-981-10-5807-3_13
    62. Gioia D. Massa; Hyeon-Hye Kim; Raymond M. Wheeler; Cary A. Mitchell; Plant Productivity in Response to LED Lighting. HortScience 2008, 43, 1951-1956, 10.21273/hortsci.43.7.1951.
    63. Sâmia Torres Silva; Suzan Kelly Vilela Bertolucci; Samuel Henrique Braga Da Cunha; Luiz Eduardo Santos Lazzarini; Marília Claudiano Tavares; José Eduardo Brasil Pereira Pinto; Effect of light and natural ventilation systems on the growth parameters and carvacrol content in the in vitro cultures of Plectranthus amboinicus (Lour.) Spreng. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) 2017, 129, 501-510, 10.1007/s11240-017-1195-6.
    64. Sun-Ja Kim; Eun-Joo Hahn; Jeong-Wook Heo; K. -Y. Paek; Effects of LEDs on net photosynthetic rate, growth and leaf stomata of chrysanthemum plantlets in vitro. Scientia Horticulturae 2004, 101, 143-151, 10.1016/j.scienta.2003.10.003.
    65. Ivan Caldeira Almeida Alvarenga; Fernanda Ventorim Pacheco; Sâmia Torres Silva; Suzan Kelly Vilela Bertolucci; José Eduardo Brasil Pereira Pinto; In vitro culture of Achillea millefolium L.: quality and intensity of light on growth and production of volatiles. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) 2015, 122, 299-308, 10.1007/s11240-015-0766-7.
    66. Anželika Kurilčik; Renata Miklušytė-Čanova; Stasė Dapkūnienė; Silva Žilinskaitė; Genadij Kurilčik; Gintautas Tamulaitis; Pavelas Duchovskis; Artūras Žukauskas; In vitro culture of Chrysanthemum plantlets using light-emitting diodes. Open Life Sciences 2008, 3, 161-167, 10.2478/s11535-008-0006-9.
    67. Yuan Lin; Jia Li; Bo Li; Tao He; Ze Chun; Effects of light quality on growth and development of protocorm-like bodies of Dendrobium officinale in vitro. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) 2010, 105, 329-335, 10.1007/s11240-010-9871-9.
    68. Habiba, Sultana Umma.; Shimasaki, Kazuhiko; Ahasan, Md Monjurul; Alam, Md Meshkatul. Effects of different light quality on growth and development of protocorm-like bodies (PLBs) in Dendrobium kingianum cultured in vitro. Bangladesh Research Publication Journal, 2014, 10, 223–227.
    69. Xu, ZG; Cui, J; Di, XR; Effects of different spectral energy distribution on tissue culture of Oncidium in vitro. Journal of Beijing Forestry University 2009, 31, 45-50, .
    70. Liu Mengxi; Zhigang Xu; Yang Yang; Feng Yijie; Effects of different spectral lights on Oncidium PLBs induction, proliferation, and plant regeneration. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) 2010, 106, 1-10, 10.1007/s11240-010-9887-1.
    71. M. Tanaka; T. Takamura; H. Watanabe; M. Endo; T. Yanagi; K. Okamoto; In vitrogrowth ofCymbidiumplantlets cultured under superbright red and blue light-emitting diodes (LEDs). The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 1998, 73, 39-44, 10.1080/14620316.1998.11510941.
    72. G.D. Goins; N.C. Yorio; M.M. Sanwo; C.S. Brown; Photomorphogenesis, photosynthesis, and seed yield of wheat plants grown under red light-emitting diodes (LEDs) with and without supplemental blue lighting. Journal of Experimental Botany 1997, 48, 1407-1413, 10.1093/jxb/48.7.1407.
    73. Vandita Billore; Monica Jain; Penna Suprasanna; Monochromic radiation through light-emitting diode (LED) positively augments in vitro shoot regeneration in Orchid (Dendrobium sonia). Canadian Journal of Biotechnology 2017, 1, 50-58, 10.24870/cjb.2017-000106.