Others

Osteoporosis Treatments

Subjects: Cell & Developmental Biology View times: 208
Submitted by: Clara I Rodriguez

Abstract

A healthy and active lifestyle is vital for the proper maintenance of all body tissues, including bone. Several studies have highlighted the importance of physical exercise to improve the quality of life of patients with osteoporosis. Diet also plays a fundamental role in bone health. Calcium supplementation is able to decrease the rate of bone mineral density loss in women, presenting even better results in combination with vitamin D. Lately, isoflavones has gain interest as a treatment in osteoporosis but their effectiveness still remains unclear. Therefore, pharmacological therapies have been developed to counteract bone fragility based on molecular targets. Therapies for osteoporosis are focus on restoring the normal balance between bone resorption and bone formation. Bone anti-resorptive therapies focus on the inhibition or reduction of bone resorption process, these are; estrogens, selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), bisphosphonates and monoclonal antibodies. On the other hand, bone formation agents target anabolic pathways to stimulate the osteoblastic activity. This include Teriparatide, a recombinant human parathyroid hormone (PTH), and Romosozumab; an anti-sclerostin monoclonal antibody with dual effect.  It increases bone formation and, to a lesser extent, it reduces bone resorption (or bone loss) which translates into a decrease in the risk of fracture. In summary, currently used osteoporosis therapies are not fully effective in all patients and present considerable side effects that seriously compromise their long-term use. Thus, the development of new therapeutic strategies for osteoporosis is necessary in an increasingly aging world population. In this context, cell-based therapeutic strategies based on mesenchymal stem cells are positioning as encouraging possibilities to address osteoporosis.

1. Introduction

A healthy and active lifestyle is vital for the proper maintenance of all body tissues, including bone. Several studies have highlighted the importance of physical exercise to improve the quality of life of patients with osteoporosis[1][2][3].

2. Current Osteoporosis Treatments and Necessities 

Recently, Filipović, T. et al 2020[4], has demonstrated that exercising is able to modulate the enzymatic activity of serum matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1 (TIMP-1) in postmenopausal osteoporotic patients.

Diet also plays a fundamental role in bone health. Calcium supplementation has been shown to be able to decrease the rate of bone mineral density loss in women, although it does not seem to be enough to prevent fractures[5]. The combination of calcium with vitamin D showed better results, with a reduction of 15% in the risk of total fractures and 30% in the risk of hip fractures[6]. During menopausal transition, the drop of endogenous estrogens enhances bone resorption, at the expenses of the new bone formation, leading to osteoporosis[7]. In consequence, estrogen intake could be an appropriate therapy against osteoporosis. However, estrogen therapy is associated with elevated cancer risk in estrogen receptor (ER)-α rich tissues like the endometrium, breast and ovary. Therefore, alternative molecules have been sought to prevent this unwanted effect of estrogen therapy. In that matter, isoflavones are a type of phytoestrogens that have shown a weak binding to ERα[8] and preferentially bind to ER-β; present in bone, liver, heart and brain. Therefore, they mimic the effects of estrogens in some tissues and at the same time, block the estrogen effects in others. Isoflavones can be absorbed through the diet in legumes (most importantly in soy), nuts and some fruits. Recently, in a randomized clinical trial, isoflavone treatment has achieved a decline in the BMD loss, together with an increased in bone turnover. Moreover, the combination of this phytoestrogens with calcium, magnesium and calcitriol showed even better results[9]. However, its effectiveness remains controversial since a meta-analysis of 10 long term clinical trials concluded that soy isoflavones did not show significant improvement in lumbar spine, total hip or femoral neck BMD of postmenopausal women[10]. Altogether, these approaches are insufficient to prevent the progression of osteoporosis. Therefore, pharmacological therapies have been developed to counteract bone fragility based on molecular targets[11]. Therapies for osteoporosis are focus on restoring the normal balance between bone resorption and bone formation. Currently, the most common therapies are the anti-resorptive ones, focusing on the inhibition or reduction of bone resorption process. These agents include estrogens, selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), bisphosphonates and monoclonal antibodies[12].

Bone resorption is highly determined by hormone levels, such us estrogens. As mentioned above, unopposed estrogen can increase the risk of breast and uterine cancers, deep vein thrombosis and stroke[13]. Therefore, in order to reduce the side effects of estrogens, SERMs have taken a step forward. Although they demonstrate selectivity toward estrogen receptors in the bone and are able to maintain bone mineral density (BMD), they lack the efficacy of traditional estrogens[14]. Many clinical trials with postmenopausal osteoporotic women using different types of SERMs have shown that their benefit for fractures prevention is anatomically limited (present certain limitations in preventing non-vertebral fractures). In addition, SERMs are also associated with detrimental extra-skeletal effects such as an increased risk of a cardiovascular event and endometrial cancer risk[15], as well as related side effects such as thromboembolic events and, in some cases, carcinogenesis[16].

Among anti-resorptive drugs, the most used are bisphosphonates. Bisphosphonates are pyrophosphate analogues that bind to hard bone through their affinity for hydroxyapatite[17]. They are incorporated into bone matrix and taken up by osteoclasts, suppressing their activity in bone remodeling[18]. This way, the bone density increases but the quality of the bone is compromise since the old bone is prone to have microfractures that negatively affect its function. Moreover, the prolonged use of bisphosphonates may lead to adverse events, such as gastrointestinal problems, osteonecrosis of the jaw, atrial fibrillation and musculoskeletal pain[19][20].

Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody that binds with high affinity to receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-Β ligand (RANKL), preventing the binding between RANKL and receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-Β (RANK) and thus inhibiting the differentiation and activity of the osteoclasts[21]. Unlike bisphosphonates, Denosumab is not incorporated into bone, yielding a much shorter terminal half-life[22]. Consequently, Denosumab presents a potential advantage for the patients who have a side effect for the therapy, due to the fact that it will be no longer active six months after the last dose. A big concern regarding Denosumab treatment is the regular adhesion to this treatment, because the patient’s fracture risk might increase after the dose “wears off”[23].

Although anti-resorptive osteoporosis medications reduce fractures, they have rare and serious adverse effects that may limit their safety for medium and long-term use, so new safe therapies capable of restoring skeletal structure and integrity are needed. In fact, current pharmacologic attempts for osteoporosis aim to prevent fractures through stimulation of bone formation. These agents target anabolic pathways to stimulate the osteoblastic activity, increasing the bone volume without inhibiting its resorption.

The first approved agent to accomplish this was teriparatide. Teriparatide is a recombinant human parathyroid hormone (PTH), known to be the only available therapeutic agent that increases the formation of new bone tissue[24]. PTH regulates the amount of calcium in bone; therefore this treatment is used to stimulate osteoblasts to create new bone[25][26]. Toxicological studies revealed osteosarcoma in treated rats; nonetheless this problem has not been detected in treated patients. As a consequence, the approved lifetime duration of treatment with teriparatide is 24 months; but it is recommended only for patients for whom potential benefits outweigh potential risk[27][28].

Romosozumab, is another monoclonal antibody recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. The registered trade name of Romosozumab is Evenity. It is the first humanized anti-sclerostin monoclonal antibody that has been shown to increase bone formation with dual effect: on one hand, it increases bone formation and, on the other, although to a lesser extent, it reduces bone resorption (or bone loss) which translates into a decrease in the risk of fracture[29]. However, according to the prescribing information; it may increase the risk of myocardial infarction, stroke and cardiovascular death. Therefore, it should not be administered to patients who have had a myocardial infarction or stroke within the preceding year.

Sclerostin, expressed by osteocytes and articular chondrocytes, is the product of SOST gene. It is an endogenous inhibitor of the Wingless-type mouse mammary virus integration site (Wnt) signaling pathway. Wnt signaling has been described as a positive regulator of bone formation and regeneration[30]and thus, Wnt signaling could be modulated to treat osteoporosis and other skeletal diseases associated with low BMD and increased facture risk[31]. Therefore, anti-sclerotin compound would inhibit sclerostin (an inhibitor of Wnt signaling) and in consequence, promote Wnt signaling and stimulate bone formation by osteoblasts[32]. Another two anti-sclerostin monoclonal antibodies are being developed by other companies; blosozumab (Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA) and BPS804 (Novartis, Basel, Switzerland).

In summary, currently used osteoporosis therapies are not fully effective in all patients and present considerable side effects that seriously compromise their long-term use. Thus, the development of new therapeutic strategies for osteoporosis is craved in an increasingly aging world population with a longer life expectancy.

The entry is from 10.3390/ijms21051653

References

  1. W.-C. Li; Y.-C. Chen; Rong-Sen Yang; Jau-Yih Tsauo; Sacha Van Twillert; Klaas Postema; Jan Hb Geertzen; Titia Hemminga; Ant T Lettinga; Effects of exercise programmes on quality of life in osteoporotic and osteopenic postmenopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Rehabilitation 2009, 23, 888-896, 10.1177/0269215509339002.
  2. Conor Lambert; Belinda R. Beck; Steven L. Watson; Amy T. Harding; Benjamin K. Weeks; Enjoyment and acceptability of different exercise modalities to improve bone health in young adult women.. Health Promotion Journal of Australia 2020, , , 10.1002/hpja.321.
  3. Laura Bragonzoni; Giuseppe Barone; Francesco Benvenuti; Veronica Canal; Claudio Ripamonti; Sofia Marini; Laura Dallolio; A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of the ACTLIFE Exercise Program for Women with Post-menopausal Osteoporosis: Study Protocol.. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2020, 17, 809, 10.3390/ijerph17030809.
  4. Tamara Filipović; Kristina Gopčević; Sanja Dimitrijević; Marija Hrković; Ana Backović; Milica Lazović; Effects of 12-Week Exercise Program on Enzyme Activity of Serum Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 and Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinase-1 in Female Patients with Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: A Randomized Control Study.. BioMed Research International 2020, 2020, 9758289-9, 10.1155/2020/9758289.
  5. Regan L. Bailey; Peishan Zou; Taylor C. Wallace; George P. McCabe; Bruce A. Craig; ShinYoung Jun; Jane A. Cauley; Connie M. Weaver; Calcium Supplement Use Is Associated With Less Bone Mineral Density Loss, But Does Not Lessen the Risk of Bone Fracture Across the Menopause Transition: Data From the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation.. JBMR Plus 2019, 4, e10246, 10.1002/jbm4.10246.
  6. C. M. Weaver; D. D. Alexander; C. J. Boushey; B. Dawson-Hughes; J. M. Lappe; M. S. LeBoff; S. Liu; A. C. Looker; T. C. Wallace; D. D. Wang; et al. Calcium plus vitamin D supplementation and risk of fractures: an updated meta-analysis from the National Osteoporosis Foundation.. Osteoporosis International 2015, 27, 367-76, 10.1007/s00198-015-3386-5.
  7. B. Lawrence Riggs; Sundeep Khosla; L. Joseph Melton; A Unitary Model for Involutional Osteoporosis: Estrogen Deficiency Causes Both Type I and Type II Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women and Contributes to Bone Loss in Aging Men. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 1998, 13, 763-773, 10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.5.763.
  8. Keiko Morito; Toshiharu Hirose; Junei Kinjo; Tomoki Hirakawa; Masafumi Okawa; Toshihiro Nohara; Sumito Ogawa; Satoshi Inoue; Masami Muramatsu; Yukito Masamune; et al. Interaction of phytoestrogens with estrogen receptors alpha and beta.. Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin 2001, 24, 351-356, 10.1248/bpb.24.351.
  9. Max Norman Tandrup Lambert; Catrine Bundgaard Thybo; Simon Lykkeboe; Lars Melholt Rasmussen; Xavier Fretté; Lars Porskjær Christensen; Per Bendix Jeppesen; Combined bioavailable isoflavones and probiotics improve bone status and estrogen metabolism in postmenopausal osteopenic women: a randomized controlled trial. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2017, 106, 909–920, 10.3945/ajcn.117.153353.
  10. Jing Liu; Suzanne C. Ho; Yi-Xiang Su; Wei-Qing Chen; Cai-Xia Zhang; Yu-Ming Chen; Effect of long-term intervention of soy isoflavones on bone mineral density in women: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Bone 2009, 44, 948-953, 10.1016/j.bone.2008.12.020.
  11. Massimo De Martinis; Maria Maddalena Sirufo; Lia Ginaldi; Osteoporosis: Current and emerging therapies targeted to immunological checkpoints.. Current Medicinal Chemistry 2019, 26, 1–16, 10.2174/0929867326666190730113123.
  12. Cheng Cheng; Kelly Wentworth; Dolores Shoback; New Frontiers in Osteoporosis Therapy. Annual Review of Medicine 2020, 71, 277-288, 10.1146/annurev-med-052218-020620.
  13. Writing Group for the Women's Health Initiative Investigators; Risks and Benefits of Estrogen Plus Progestin in Healthy Postmenopausal Women: Principal Results From the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA 2002, 288, 321-333, 10.1001/jama.288.3.321.
  14. Erik Nelson; Suzanne E. Wardell; Donald P. McDonnell; The molecular mechanisms underlying the pharmacological actions of estrogens, SERMs and oxysterols: implications for the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis.. Bone 2012, 53, 42-50, 10.1016/j.bone.2012.11.011.
  15. Ki-Chan An; Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators. Asian Spine Journal 2016, 10, 787-791, 10.4184/asj.2016.10.4.787.
  16. John A. Arnott; Stephen Martinkovich; Sonia Lobo Planey; Darshan Shah; Selective estrogen receptor modulators: tissue specificity and clinical utility. Clinical Interventions in Aging 2014, 9, 1437-1452, 10.2147/CIA.S66690.
  17. Molly Stapleton; Kazuki Sawamoto; Carlos J. Alméciga-Diaz; William G. MacKenzie; Robert W. Mason; Tadao Orii; Shunji Tomatsu; Development of Bone Targeting Drugs. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2017, 18, 1345, 10.3390/ijms18071345.
  18. Alfred A. Reszka; Gideon A. Rodan; Bisphosphonate mechanism of action.. Current Rheumatology Reports 2003, 5, 65-74, 10.1007/s11926-003-0085-6.
  19. Erik Fink Eriksen; Adolfo Diez‐Perez; Steven Boonen; Update on long-term treatment with bisphosphonates for postmenopausal osteoporosis: A systematic review. Bone 2014, 58, 126-135, 10.1016/j.bone.2013.09.023.
  20. Kurt A. Kennel; Matthew T. Drake; Adverse Effects of Bisphosphonates: Implications for Osteoporosis Management. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2009, 84, 632-638, 10.4065/84.7.632.
  21. Sarah Zaheer; Meryl LeBoff; E. Michael Lewiecki; Denosumab for the treatment of osteoporosis.. Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology 2015, 11, 461-70, 10.1517/17425255.2015.1000860.
  22. Roland Baron; Serge Ferrari; R.G.G. Russell; Denosumab and bisphosphonates: Different mechanisms of action and effects. Bone 2011, 48, 677-692, 10.1016/j.bone.2010.11.020.
  23. Athanasios D Anastasilakis; Stergios A. Polyzos; Polyzois Makras; THERAPY OF ENDOCRINE DISEASE: Denosumab vs bisphosphonates for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. European Journal of Endocrinology 2018, 179, R31-R45, 10.1530/eje-18-0056.
  24. A. B. Hodsman; Uglas C. Bauer; David W. Dempster; Larry Dian; David Hanley; Steven T. Harris; D.L. Kendler; Michael R. McClung; P.D. Miller; Wojciech P. Olszynski; et al. Parathyroid Hormone and Teriparatide for the Treatment of Osteoporosis: A Review of the Evidence and Suggested Guidelines for Its Use. Endocrine Reviews 2005, 26, 688-703, 10.1210/er.2004-0006.
  25. R. Lindsay; John H. Krege; Francisco Marín; L. Jin; Jan Štěpán; Teriparatide for osteoporosis: importance of the full course.. Osteoporosis International 2016, 27, 2395-410, 10.1007/s00198-016-3534-6.
  26. Robert M. Neer; Claude D. Arnaud; Jose R. Zanchetta; Richard Prince; Gregory A. Gaich; J.Y. Reginster; Anthony B. Hodsman; Erik Fink Eriksen; Sophia Ish-Shalom; Harry K. Genant; et al. Effect of Parathyroid Hormone (1-34) on Fractures and Bone Mineral Density in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey 2001, 56, 623-624, 10.1097/00006254-200110000-00018.
  27. John Vahle; Masahiko Sato; Gerald G. Long; Jamie K. Young; Paul C. Francis; Jeffery A. Engelhardt; Michael S. Westmore; Yanfei Linda Ma; James B. Nold; Skeletal Changes in Rats Given Daily Subcutaneous Injections of Recombinant Human Parathyroid Hormone (1-34) for 2 Years and Relevance to Human Safety. Toxicologic Pathology 2002, 30, 312-321, 10.1080/01926230252929882.
  28. John Vahle; Gerald G. Long; George Sandusky; Michael Westmore; Yanfei Linda Ma; Masahiko Sato; Bone Neoplasms in F344 Rats Given Teriparatide [rhPTH(1-34)] Are Dependent on Duration of Treatment and Dose. Toxicologic Pathology 2004, 32, 426-438, 10.1080/01926230490462138.
  29. Emil H. Schemitsch; Theodore Miclau; Theofilos Karachalios; Lauren L. Nowak; Parag Sancheti; Rudolf W. Poolman; John Caminis; Nadia Daizadeh; Ricardo E. Dent-Acosta; Ogo Egbuna; et al. A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study of Romosozumab for the Treatment of Hip Fractures. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 2020, null, null, 10.2106/jbjs.19.00790.
  30. Hua Zhu Ke; William G. Richards; Xiaodong Li; Michael S Ominsky; Sclerostin and Dickkopf-1 as Therapeutic Targets in Bone Diseases. Endocrine Reviews 2012, 33, 747-783, 10.1210/er.2011-1060.
  31. E. Michael Lewiecki; New targets for intervention in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Nature Reviews Rheumatology 2011, 7, 631-638, 10.1038/nrrheum.2011.130.
  32. E. Michael Lewiecki; Role of sclerostin in bone and cartilage and its potential as a therapeutic target in bone diseases. Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease 2013, 6, 48-57, 10.1177/1759720X13510479.

Related entries