Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 format correct + 3073 word(s) 3073 2020-12-02 06:59:30 |
2 format correct Meta information modification 3073 2020-12-03 03:00:15 |

Video Upload Options

Do you have a full video?

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Stratilová, B.; Kozmon, S.; Stratilová, E.; Hrmova, M. Plant Xyloglucan Xyloglucosyl Transferases. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/3326 (accessed on 26 April 2024).
Stratilová B, Kozmon S, Stratilová E, Hrmova M. Plant Xyloglucan Xyloglucosyl Transferases. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/3326. Accessed April 26, 2024.
Stratilová, Barbora, Stanislav Kozmon, Eva Stratilová, Maria Hrmova. "Plant Xyloglucan Xyloglucosyl Transferases" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/3326 (accessed April 26, 2024).
Stratilová, B., Kozmon, S., Stratilová, E., & Hrmova, M. (2020, December 03). Plant Xyloglucan Xyloglucosyl Transferases. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/3326
Stratilová, Barbora, et al. "Plant Xyloglucan Xyloglucosyl Transferases." Encyclopedia. Web. 03 December, 2020.
Plant Xyloglucan Xyloglucosyl Transferases
Edit

Plant xyloglucan xyloglucosyl transferases or xyloglucan endo-transglycosylases (XET; EC 2.4.1.207) catalogued in the glycoside hydrolase family 16 constitute cell wall-modifying enzymes that play a fundamental role in the cell wall expansion and re-modelling. Over the past thirty years, it has been established that XET enzymes catalyse homo-transglycosylation reactions with xyloglucan (XG)-derived substrates and hetero-transglycosylation reactions with neutral and charged donor and acceptor substrates other than XG-derived. This broad specificity in XET isoforms is credited to a high degree of structural and catalytic plasticity that has evolved ubiquitously in algal, moss, fern, basic Angiosperm, monocot, and eudicot enzymes. These XET isoforms constitute gene families that are differentially expressed in tissues in time- and space-dependent manners during plant growth and development, and in response to biotic and abiotic stresses.

enzyme structure and function GH16 family homo- and hetero-transglycosylation reactions molecular modelling and simulations plant cell walls loosening and re-modelling

1. Plant Cell Walls and Structure, and Key Components

The presence of polysaccharide-rich cell walls (CWs) is a characteristic feature of plants and fungi. Throughout the evolution of plants, CWs have conformed to multiple roles, including mechanical support, diffusion and growth regulation, defence against biotic and abiotic stresses, and cell-to-cell communication. CWs are highly complex structural entities largely composed of organic polymeric molecules interlinked by covalent and non-covalent linkages. Properties of CWs depend on the composition and chemical linkages of individual adjoined components, and their structure [1][2][3][4][5][6].

All land plants classified in Embryophytes evolved from Charophytes green algae (Figure 1A) contain CWs assumed to be one of the most decisive factors that allowed for terrestrialisation [7][8][9][10]. Despite certain common components, the composition of CWs varies in species [11][12] and tissues [13][14][15][16][17]. The structure of plant CWs could also be affected by growth conditions [18] and some common distributions of main structural polysaccharides are observed that depend on the evolutionary history of a plant including algae [19][20][21][22]. However, certain polysaccharides could have evolved independently several times [16], and this is observed in (1,3;1,4)-β-d-glucans (mix-linkage glucans, MLGs) in Pteridophytes (ferns, whisk ferns, horsetails) [23][24][25] and Poales (grasses) [26] (Figure 1A). CWs of grasses differ from those of other higher plants in a lower content of xyloglucans (XGs) and pectins but in a higher content of heteroxylans.

Plants are known to construct two types of CWs, termed primary cell walls (PCWs) and secondary cell walls (SCWs) that differ in composition, structure, and function. The dynamic PCW structures comprise of the networks of cellulose micro-fibrils tethered by cross-linking glycans [27] that are embedded in the matrix of pectin substances [28][29] and glycoproteins. Glycans or hemicelluloses include variously substituted XGs, which are the major form of cross-linking glycans in dicotyledonous plants, while xylan(s)—Xyl(s), arabinoxylan(s)—AraXyl(s), glucuronoarabinoxylan(s), mannan(s)—Man(s), galactomannan(s)—GalMan(s), glucomannan(s)—GlcMan(s) and galactoglucomannan(s)—GalGlcMan(s), and MLGs largely replace XGs in monocots and lower plants [30]. Pectins [31] composed of the homogalacturonan (HG) part are cross-linked via Ca2+ bridges that causes the gelling effect, while the ‘hairy’ regions of pectins are made of rhamnogalacturonan I (RG I) and rhamnogalacturonan II (RG II) [32][33][34][35]. Conversely, SCWs that are more typical for woody and vascular tissues after their growth ceases are more rigid compared to PCWs since they contain more of other cross-linking glycans than pectins, and are reinforced by lignin, a hydrophobic phenylpropanoid polymer [36][37][38].

Cellulose, as the most abundant organic compound on Earth [39], consists of the repeating glucopyranose moieties linked through (1,4)-β-d-linkages that form micro-fibrils tightly bound via hydrogen bonds—these supra-molecular structures form the backbone of PCWs [40]. Cellulose is found not only in CWs of green algae and higher plants but also in Rhodophyta (red algae), Phaeophyceae (brown algae), Oomycetes (fungus-like microorganisms), Ameobozoa, animals, and in some Procaryotes (Cyanobacteria).

The biosynthesis of XGs [41] seems to be reserved for plants including certain green algae [42]. XG was not detected in red and brown algae, and this absence is also supported by the lack of XG modifying enzymes in these organisms [43]. XG consists of repeating (1,4)-β-d-linked glucopyranosyl moieties [44], which contain the C-6 carbon branching by α-d-xylopyranosyl residues. Xylosyl moieties could be further substituted by galactopyranosyl residues on C-2 carbons (β-d-Galp-(1,2)-α-d-Xylp) and the galactosyl moieties could carry the fucopyranosyl branching (α-l-Fucp-(1,2)-β-d-Galp-(1,2)-α-d-Xylp). In certain instances, the arabinopyranosyl [45][46] and galacturonate [47][48] substituents are found, which suggests that the structure of XG differs from plant to plant, but also between the parts of the same plant [49][50][51]. The XG backbone is synthesised by a XG:glucan synthase encoded by members of the C subfamily of cellulose synthase-like (CSL) genes [52], but only when both UDP-glucose and UDP-xylose are present [53][54], meaning that the activity of another enzyme XG:xylosyltransferase is required to produce XG [53]. Most of XG residues are substituted with d-Gal by XG:galactosyltransferases and further modified with l-fucose by XG:fucosyltransferases [53][54], although more work is required to clarify all aspect of XG biosynthesis. A recent study with the C subfamily CSL synthases and their genes found a quintuple mutant with disruptions in five C subfamily CSL genes that had no detectable XG, and did not display the significant alteration of gene expression at the whole genome level [41].

Figure 1. Polysaccharides form the structural foundation of plant CWs. (A) distinct polysaccharides emerge in plant CWs in phyla during the evolutionary history of plants [55]; (B,C) intuitive CW structural models by Albersheim et al. [56] (B), and Park and Cosgrove [57] (C); (D) mechanisms of action of XET enzymes leading to the loosening of CWs through homo-transglycosylation reactions (top panel) [1], and cross-linking cellulose and XGs through hetero-transglycosylation reactions (bottom panel) that could enhance tighter packing of cellulose micro-fibrils and other polysaccharides [58]. Cellulose micro-fibrils are in green and XGs in red in (BD); pectins are in yellow in (B,C); XETs are in cyan in D; the plasma membrane is in blue in (B,C).

The similarity between the structure of XG and cellulose underlies the conformational homology of these polysaccharides, which results in their strong noncovalent associations . Networks of cellulose and XGs were for a long time considered to support the structure of PCWs, which also trigger their flexibility and strength [59][60][61][62][63]. The most recognised PCW model of dicotyledons [56] is based on linear micro-fibrils of cellulose, each consisting of 32 cellulosic micro-fibrils inter-connected through hydrogen bonds. These para-crystalline micro-fibrils are interwoven and bridged to polymeric XGs. According to this model (Figure 1B), the function of pectin is attributed to a gelling material that pervades the space between the cellulosic and XG structures. The advances in the field of microscopic techniques allowed for the development of advanced CW models based on so-called hot spots of cellulose micro-fibrils, where these micro-fibrils composed of eight or sixteen cellulosic subunits [64], come to close contacts with each other (Figure 1C). These hot spots of cellulosic micro-fibrils are isolated from each other by a thin layer of XGs, which according to this model are isolated in PCWs [57]. Here, pectins serve as the filling material between the cellulosic and XGs structures, and take over the major role of the XGs, compared to the first model. Various pectins interact both with cellulose and XGs, thus ensuring the flexibility and strength of CWs [65]. The processes of hot spots formation remain unknown, although one possibility is that they are formed spontaneously during the cellulose deposition into CWs, or that they could be formed enzymatically [66].

While there are numerous studies focused on the role of XGs in CW modifications during plant growth and development, little information is available as to how XGs participate in the CW formation. Recent work focused on the regeneration of CWs in wild-type Arabidopsis thaliana and a double mutant xxt1 xxt2 lacking any detectable XGs, suggested that the formation of cellulosic networks is XG-independent [67].

As already noted, CWs show a remarkable diversity that underlies the function of each cell, which is directly linked to the basic and subtle structure of polymers, their quantity, ratios, and underpins mutual interactions. The syntheses of CW polysaccharides occur due to the cooperative activities of prodigious numbers of biosynthetic glycosyl transferases (GTs) or synthases [68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84], localised mostly in the Golgi apparatus [85]. The products of these GTs and synthases are transported to CWs by secretory vesicles, although the exception includes the superfamilies of cellulose synthases [85][86][87][88][89][90] and callose synthases [91] locating in the plasma membrane [92]. In the latter instances, polysaccharides synthesised by these enzymes could be exported directly to CWs. However, the structural polysaccharides that are observed in CWs are often heterogeneous. This is assumed to be achieved through a wide range of available activated sugar donors required for GTs activities, which could give rise to a variety of glycosidic linkages using different sugar isomers.

Life processes in plants are underscored by CWs structure and re-organisation, which involves disintegration, elongation and expansion. In addition to GTs, these processes are governed by hydrolases and lyases, and non-catalytic expansin proteins [93][94][95][96]. As in the case of GTs, there is a vast number of enzymes that could modify structural polysaccharides in muro by cleaving bonds, esterifying or de-esterifying saccharide moieties [97][98], and incorporating new material into CWs or re-constructing CW polymers by cross-linking. The last two processes are secured by xyloglucan xyloglucosyl transferase also known as xyloglucan endo-transglycosylase (XET) enzymes (Figure 1D), which could either loosen or enhance the packing of cellulosic micro-fibrils and other polysaccharides in CWs [99].

Xyloglucan xyloglucosyl transferases or XET enzymes (EC 2.4.1.207) as one of the key glycosidic bond-formation enzymes participating in plant CW expansion, reconstruction, and re-modelling [100][101][102][103][104] were independently discovered by three groups [105][106][107]. According to the Enzyme Commission [108], these enzymes are also named as endo-xyloglucan transferases.

2. Roles of Xyloglucan Xyloglucosyl Transferases in Cell Wall Formation and Re-Modelling

Catalysis, and remarks on the nomenclature and classification—The nomenclature of xyloglucan xyloglucosyl transferases or XET enzymes is defined by the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (IUBMB)/International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) Biochemical Nomenclature Committee [108] that is also implemented in the Kyoto Encyclopaedia of Genes and Genomes Enzyme Database (KEGG). These enzymes are classified amongst transferases by the Enzyme Commission (EC) and listed under the primary identifier EC 2.4.1.207 in IUBMB/IUPAC and the BRENDA collection of enzyme functional data [109]. The differences in the used nomenclature are based on whether the authors consider the transfer of ‘glycosyl’ (xyloglucan endo-transglycosylase) or ‘glucosyl’ (xyloglucan endo-transglucosylase) groups [110][111][112][113][114][115][116][117], although given that XETs primarily transfer XG fragments, the usage of the first name should be preferred. The fundamental feature of the catalysis mediated by XETs is the breaking of a bond between 1,4-β-d-linked glucosyl residues of XGs and the transfer of an XG fragment onto O-4 of the non-reducing terminal end of the glucose moiety of the acceptor, which can be XG or its oligosaccharide (XG-OS). This constitutes a so-called ping-pong bi bi reaction mechanism rather than a sequential one [118][119]. It is of note that the definition by the Enzyme Commission contains a strict note ‘does not use cello-oligosaccharides as either donor or acceptor’, although, in the light of the current knowledge, this specification is obsolete [120][121][122][123][124][125].

A more objective view on the XET enzyme nomenclature and classification is given by the Carbohydrate-Active enZYmes Database (CAZy; CAZypedia Consortium 2018) [126], which is based on protein tertiary structures and substrate specificities or activities. According to CAZy, XETs are classified in a glycoside hydrolase (GH16 family) and not in a glycoside transferase (GT) group. According to this classification, the latter group contains enzymes which utilise activated sugar donors. In accordance with tertiary structures of XET enzymes, the first steps of both transglycosylation and hydrolytic reactions are binding and cleavage of donor substrates. The difference occurs in the second step, in which the fragment with the original non-reducing end of the substrate is transferred to an acceptor, which in the case of a typical transglycosylase is another saccharide, while, in the case of a hydrolase, it is a water molecule (Figure 2A) [127]. This second step of the reaction has the key importance for the nomenclature and classification of transglycosylases as transferases. Commonly, most hydrolases could also transglycosylate, but this only occurs under high substrate concentrations [128], when in the later stages the products accumulate and shift the chemical equilibrium of the reaction towards transglycosylation reactions, due to a specific response of the biocatalyst. Contrary to this, ‘true’ transglycosylases, which include XETs, catalyse primarily the transfer on a saccharide from the beginning of the reaction. While hydrolytic reactions catalysed by hydrolases reflect the increased concentrations of reducing groups in the reaction system, this is not the case for ‘true’ transglycosylases. Furthermore, during reactions with endo-transglycosylases, no dramatic decrease in the viscosity of the polymeric substrates is observed at the early stages of reactions, contrary to endo-hydrolases. Besides XETs, other transglycosylases or enzymes with potential transglycosylase activities were described in plants as endo-transglycosylases/hydrolases recognising (1,4)-β-d-mannan-derived polysaccharides [129][130], xylan endo-transglycosylases functionalising heteroxylan polysaccharides [131][132][133], MLG: xyloglucan endotransglucosylases [134][135] recognising MLGs, and the hetero-trans-β-glucanase (HTG) that functionalise cellulose [136], although designating these enzymes as such hides the fact that the latter enzymes are broad specific or poly-specific XET enzymes.

XET enzymes are classified in GH family 16 (GH16) in CAZy. A GH16 family is a large group, which was according to specific features in tertiary structures further sub-divided into 23 subfamilies [137]. Subfamily GH16_20 includes XETs and xyloglucan endohydrolases (XEHs, EC 3.2.1.151) [138][139] with predominantly hydrolytic activities towards XGs. This group of enzymes contains the products of XTH (xyloglucan transglycosylase/hydrolase) genes encoding both types of XG-modifying enzymes which display close similarity in their tertiary structures [140].

Figure 2. The GH16_20 subfamily of the XTH enzymes. (A) reaction mechanism leading to transglycosylation or hydrolytic reactions; (B) superposition of the crystal structure of poplar PttXET16A transglycosylase (PDB accession 1UN1; red) and the nasturtium TmNXG1 hydrolase (green)  points to structural differences that underlie their distinct activities; differences in selected signatures that underlie these activities are indicated by sequence alignments, and some of these residues shown in the inset; (C) unrooted phylogenetic tree of the GH16 subfamily (MEGA v7.0.26; [141]) shows clustering of entries into three subgroups, where subgroups I and II consist of transglycosylases and subgroup III of hydrolases .

Currently, the best characterised XET enzyme is the PttXET16A isoform from hybrid aspen, Populus tremulus x tremuloides . After its expression in a recombinant host achieved in high yields in Pichia, the crystal structure of PttXET16A (Protein Data Bank—PDB accessions 1UN1 and 1UMZ) revealed that the enzyme folds into two antiparallel β-sheets, which form a β-sandwich consisting of convex and concave regions. The catalytic machinery, formed by two glutamic acid residues Glu85 and Glu89, with an aspartate Asp87, is located approximately mid-way in the convex region. The C-terminal end is elongated compared to other XTH family members and located near the convex region of the β-sheet, forming an α-helix and another β-strand on the concave side of the molecule; this part of the structure is stabilised by two disulphide bridges. PttXET16A is N-glycosylated at Asn93 with two N-acetylglucosaminyl and mannosyl moieties that are stabilised by hydrogen bonds. The structures of other plant XET enzymes are yet to be determined, however, the structural features of barley and nasturtium XETs (Figures 2B, 3B, and 4B) and HTG were defined through homology modelling, an approach that could introduce local approximations in structural features of modelled XETs [142].

The mechanism of transglycosylation catalysed by XET enzymes proceeds in two stages that incorporate two transition states (Figure 2A). The first step is the deprotonation of the carboxyl acid residue acting as the nucleophile that attacks the anomeric carbon forming the glycosyl-enzyme intermediate complex with acidic assistance provided by the acidic carboxylate. In PttXET16A, the nucleophile attacking the anomeric carbon is Glu85, while Glu89 acts as an acid/base, which protonates the released saccharide and subsequently de-protonates the glycosyl acceptor. The Asp87 residue located mid-way between both catalysts Glu85 and Glu89 controls the protonation state of the catalytic machinery and operates through hydrogen bonding interactions. The nucleophile must be de-protonated during the donor substrate attack, while Asp87 and Glu89 are protonated and donate the proton to a leaving saccharide. During the later stages of the transfer reaction, the glycosyl-enzyme intermediate complex dissociates after the nucleophile attack on the anomeric carbon, and a new glycosidic bond is formed .

Interactions between residues in PttXET16A and dimeric XG nonasaccharide were obtained using molecular dynamics simulations . The substrate was modelled in active site in a way, in which one of the XG nonasaccharide dimers occupied the donor site creating a stable intermediate with the enzyme, while the second XG nonasaccharide occupied the acceptor site. It was important to observe that the XG nonasaccharide of the reducing-end glucose moiety changed its conformation into a boat at the beginning of the simulation and kept this conformation during the whole simulation time. This was the case not only for PttXET16A, but also for XEHs.

Attention was paid to structural differences, which determine whether the XET/XEH enzymes act as transglycosylases (PDB accessions 1UN1, 1UMZ) or hydrolases (TmNXG1; PDB accession 2UWA) [143]; here, the information of their primary and crystal structures was compared including the TmNXG1-DELTAYNIIG mutant (PDB accession 2VH9). Minor differences in structures lead to stronger binding of a donor substrate combined with larger loop flexibility at the acceptor binding site, and the higher conformational flexibility of specific residues underlined the hydrolytic preference [143] (Figure 2B). This was also reflected by the phylogenetic analyses, which showed that the distribution of XTH gene products was segregated into three groups, with XEHs belonging to the XTH III clade, while XETs were placed in both XTH I and XTH II clades (Figure 2C, Supplementary Data Set S1) [144]. Based on these structural and phylogeny insights, it was postulated that GH16 hydrolases could have evolved from XET transglycosylases [143], although the research including a gradual cross-genome survey and the whole GH16 family phylogeny continues [145]].

Enzyme activity assays methods—Preferred methods of XET activity assays are based on the use of radiochemically or fluorescently labelled acceptor oligosaccharides and an unlabelled donor polysaccharide. Alternatively, radiolabelled donor and unlabelled acceptor substrates could be used . Products then contain labelled components that are incorporated into products, and remaining unincorporated donors or acceptors are removed through washing on a filter-paper [146], through a gel [147][149], size-exclusion chromatography, or ethanol precipitation [148]. Labelled oligosaccharides could also be used in high-throughput activity assays [149] and for visualisations of XET activities in vivo [150][151][152][153]. Despite an undeniable advantage of the latter technique for screening of XET activities, it is important to consider ongoing reactions amongst polysaccharides in muro. For the selection of activity assays, it is crucial to consider the choice of fluorescent tags [154][155] and the removal of unreacted donors or acceptors. Other XET activity assays include viscometry and colorimetry [156].

References

  1. Fry, S.C. Primary cell wall metabolism: Tracking the careers of wall polymers in living plant cells. New Phytol. 2004, 161, 641–675.
  2. Cosgrove, D. Growth of the plant cell wall. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005, 6, 850–861.
  3. Cabib, E; Farkaš, V.; Kosík, O.; Blanco, N.; Arroyo, J.; McPhie, P. Assembly of the yeast cell wall. Crh1p and Crh2p act as transglycosylases in vivo and in vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 29859–29872.
  4. Farrokhi, V; Burton, R.A.; Brownfield, L.; Hrmova, M.; Wilson, S.M.; Bacic, A.; Fincher, G.B. Plant cell wall biosynthesis: Genetic, biochemical and functional genomics approaches to the identification of key genes. Plant Biotech. J. 2009, 4, 145–167.
  5. Blanco, N.; Sanz, A.B.; Rodriguez-Pena, J.M.; Nombela, C.; Farkaš, V; Hurtado-Guerrero, R.; Arroyo, J. Structural and functional analysis of yeast Crh1 and Crh2 transglycosylases. FEBS J. 2015, 282, 715–731.
  6. Cosgrove, J. Plant cell wall extensibility: Connecting plant cell growth with cell wall structure, mechanics, and the action of wall modifying enzymes. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 67, 463–476.
  7. Graham, L.E.; Cook, M.E.; Busse, J.S. The origin of plants: Body plan changes contributing to a major evolutionary radiation. PNAS 2000, 97, 4535–4540.
  8. Niklas, K.J. The cell walls that bind the tree of life. BioScience 2004, 54, 831–841.
  9. Niklas, J.; Kutschera, U. The evolution of the land plant life cycle. New Phytol. 2010, 185, 27–41.
  10. Sørensen, I.; Pettolino, A.; Bacic, A.; Ralph, J.; Lu, F.; O’Neill, M.A.; Fei, Z.; Rose, J.K.C.; Domozych, D.S.; Willats, W.G.T. The charophycean green algae provide insights into the early origins of plant cell walls. Plant J. 2011, 68, 201–211.
  11. Popper, Z.A.; Fry, C. Primary cell wall composition of bryophytes and charophytes. Ann. Bot. 2003, 91, 1–12.
  12. Popper, A.; Fry, S.C. Primary cell wall composition of the pteridophytes and spermatophytes. New Phytol. 2004, 164, 165–174.
  13. Fincher, G.B. Revolutionary times in our understanding of cell wall biosynthesis and remodeling in the grasses. Plant Physiol. 2009, 149, 7–37.
  14. Burton, A.; Gidley, M.J.; Fincher, G.B. Heterogeneity in the chemistry, structure and function of plant cell walls. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2010, 6, 724–732.
  15. Sørensen, I.; Domozych, D.; Willats, G.T. How have plant cell walls evolved? Plant Physiol. 2010, 153, 366–372.
  16. Fangel, J.U.; Ulvskov, ; Knox, J.P.; Mikkelsen, M.D.; Harholt, J.; Popper, Z.A.; Willats, W.G.T. Cell wall evolution and diversity. Front. Plant Sci. 2012, 3, 153.
  17.  Kozlova, V.; Nazipova, A.R.; Gorshkov, O.V.; Petrova, A.A.; Gorshkova, T.A. Elongating maize root: Zone-specific combinations of polysaccharides from type I and type II primary cell walls. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 10956.
  18. Iraki, M.; Bressan, R.A.; Hasegawa, P.M.; Carpita, N.C. Alteration of the physical and chemical structure of the primary cell wall of growth-limited plant cells adapted to osmotic stress. Plant Physiol. 1989, 91, 39–47.
  19. Popper, Z.A. Evolution and diversity of green plant cell walls. Opin. Plant Biol. 2008, 11, 286–292.
  20. Sarkar, P; Bosneaga, E.; Auer, M. Plant cell walls throughout evolution: Towards a molecular understanding of their design principles. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 3615–3635.
  21. Popper, A.; Tuohy, M.G. Beyond the green: Understanding the evolutionary puzzle of plant and algal cell walls. Plant Physiol. 2010, 153, 373–383.
  22. Popper, Z.A.; Michel, G.; Hervé, C.; Domozych, D.S.; Willats, G.; Tuohy, M.G.; Kloareg, B.; Stengel, D.B. Evolution and diversity of plant cell walls: From algae to flowering plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2011, 62, 567–590.
  23. Fry, C.; Nesselrode, B.H.W.A.; Miller, J.G.; Mewburn, B.R. Mixed-linkage (1→3,1→4)-β-d-glucan is a major hemicellulose of Equisetum (horsetail) cell walls. New Phytol. 2008, 179, 104–115.
  24. Sørensen, I; Pettolino, F.A.; Wilson, S.M.; Doblin, M.S.; Johansen, B.; Bacic, A.; Willats, W.G. Mixed-linkage (1→ 3),(1→4)-β-d-glucan is not unique to the Poales and is an abundant component of Equisetum arvense cell walls. Plant J. 2008, 54, 510–521.
  25. Xue, X.; Fry, C. Evolution of mixed-linkage (1→3, 1→4)-β-d-glucan (MLG) and xyloglucan in Equisetum (horsetails) and other monilophytes. Ann. Bot. 2012, 109, 873–886.
  26. Burton, A.; Fincher, G.B. (1,3;1,4)-β-d-glucans in cell walls of the Poaceae, lower plants, and fungi: A tale of two linkages. Mol. Plant 2009, 2, 873–882.
  27. Scheller, V.; Ulvskov, P. Hemicelluloses. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2010, 61, 263–289.
  28. Popper, Z.A.; Fry, C. Widespread occurrence of a covalent linkage between xyloglucan and acidic polysaccharides in suspension-cultured angiosperm cells. Ann. Bot. 2005, 96, 91–99.
  29. Marcus, S.E.; Verhertbruggen, Y; Hervé, C.; Ordaz-Ortiz, J.J.; Farkaš, V.; Pedersen, H.L.; Willats, W.G.T.; Knox, J.P. Pectic homogalacturonan masks abundant sets of xyloglucan epitopes in plant cell walls. BMC Plant Biol. 2008, 8, 60.
  30. McCann, M.C.; Knox, P. Plant cell wall biology: Polysaccharides in architectural and developmental contexts. Ann. Plant Rew. Online 2018, 343–366.
  31. Harholt, J.; Suttangkakul, A.; Scheller, H. Biosynthesis of pectin. Plant Physiol. 2010, 153, 384–395.
  32. Ridley, L.; O’Neill, M.A.; Mohnen, D. Pectins: Structure, biosynthesis, and oligogalacturonide-related signalling. Phytochemistry 2001, 57, 929–967.
  33. Vincken, P.; Schols, H.A.; Oomen, R.J.; Mccann, M.C.; Ulvskov, P.; Voragen, A.G.J.; Visser, R.G.F. If homogalacturonan were a side chain of rhamnogalacturonan I. Implications for cell wall architecture. Plant Physiol. 2003, 132, 1781–1789.
  34. Mohnen, D. Pectin structure and biosynthesis. Opin. Plant. Biol. 2008, 11, 266–277.
  35. Caffall, H.; Mohnen, D. The structure, function, and biosynthesis of plant cell wall pectic polysaccharides. Carbohydr. Res. 2009, 344, 1879–1900.
  36. Boerjan, W; Ralph, J.; Baucher, M. Lignin biosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant. Biol. 2003, 54, 519–546.
  37. Weng, K.; Chapple, C. The origin and evolution of lignin biosynthesis. New Phytol. 2010, 187, 273–285.
  38. Mnich, E.; Bjarnholt, N.; Eudes, A.; Harholt, J.; Holland, C.; Jørgensen, B.; Larsen, H.; Liu, M.; Manat, R.; Meyer, A.S.; et al. Phenolic cross-links: Building and de-constructing the plant cell wall. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2020, 37, 919–961.
  39. Horton, Preface. The two most abundant organic substances on Earth, cellulose and starch. Adv. Carbohydr. Chem. Biochem. 2010, 64, xi–xiii.
  40. Heinze, Cellulose: Structure and properties. In Cellulose Chemistry and Properties: Fibers, Nanocelluloses and Advanced Materials. Advances in Polymer Science; Rojas, O., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; Volume 271.
  41. Kim, J.; Chandrasekar, B.; Rea, A.C.; Danhof, L.; Zemelis-Durfee, S.; Thrower, N.; Shepard, Z.S.; Pauly, M.; Brandizzi, F.; Keegstra, K. The synthesis of xyloglucan, an abundant plant cell wall polysaccharide, requires CSLC function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 20316–20324.
  42. Ikegaya, H.; Hayashi, T; Kaku, T.; Iwata, K.; Sonobe, S.; Shimmen, T. Presence of xyloglucan-like polysaccharide in Spirogyra and possible involvement in cell–cell attachment. Phycol. Res. 2008, 56, 216–222.
  43. Van Sandt, S.; Stieperaere, H.; Guisez, Y.; Verbelen, J.P.; Vissenberg, K. XET activity is found near sites of growth and cell elongation in bryophytes and some green algae: New insights into the evolution of primary cell wall elongation. Ann. Bot. 2007, 99, 39–51.
  44. Fry, C.; Aldington, S.; Hetherington, P.R.; Aitken, J. Oligosaccharides as signals and substrates in the plant cell wall. Plant Physiol. 1993, 103, 1–5.
  45. York, S.; Van Halbeek, H.; Darvill, A.G.; Albersheim, P. Structural analysis of xyloglucan oligosaccharides by 1H-n.m.r. spectroscopy and fast-atom-bombardment mass spectrometry. Carbohydr Res. 1990, 200, 9–31.
  46. York, W.S.; Harvey, K.; Guillen, R.; Albersheim, P.; Darvill, A.G. Structural analysis of tamarind seed xyloglucan oligosaccharides using beta-galactosidase digestion and spectroscopic methods. Carbohydr. Res. 1993, 248, 285–301.
  47. Peña, M.J.; Darvill, A.G.; Eberhard, S.; York, W.S.; O’Neill, M.A. Moss and liverwort xyloglucans contain galacturonic acid and are structurally distinct from the xyloglucans synthesized by hornworts and vascular Glycobiology 2008, 18, 891–904.
  48. Peña, M.J.; Kong, ; York, W.S.; O’Neill, M.A. A galacturonic acid-containing xyloglucan is involved in Arabidopsis root hair tip growth. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 4511–4524.
  49. Hsieh, S.Y.; Harris, P.J. Xyloglucans of monocotyledons have diverse structures. Mol. Plant 2009, 2, 943–965.
  50. Hsieh, S.Y.; Paxton, M.; Ade, C.P.; Harris, P.J. Structural diversity, functions and biosynthesis of xyloglucans in angiosperm cell walls. NZ J. Forest Sci. 2009, 39, 187–196.
  51. Zheng, Y; Wang, X.; Chen, Y.; Wagner, E.; Cosgrove, D.J. Xyloglucan in the primary cell wall: Assessment by FESEM, selective enzyme digestions and nanogold affinity tags. Plant J. 2018, 93, 211–226.
  52. Cocuron, J.C.; Lerouxel, O.; Drakakaki, G.; Alonso, P.; Liepman, A.H.; Keegstra, K.; Raikhel, N.; Wilkerson, C.G. A gene from the cellulose synthase-like C family encodes a β-1,4 glucan synthase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 8550–8555.
  53. Pauly, M; Keegstra, K. Biosynthesis of the plant cell wall matrix polysaccharide xyloglucan. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2016, 67, 235–259.
  54. Hayashi, Xyloglucans in the primary cell wall. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1989, 40, 139–168.
  55. Zhang, Y; Xiao, G.; Wang, X.; Zhang, X.; Friml, J. Evolution of fast root gravitropism in seed plants. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 3480.
  56. Albersheim, P; Darvill, A.; Roberts, K.; Sederoff, R.; Staehelin, A. Plant Cell Walls, from Chemistry to Biology. Garland Science; Garland Science: New York, NY, USA, 2011; pp. 227–272, ISBN 978-0815319962.
  57. Park, B.; Cosgrove, D.J. A revised architecture of primary cell walls based on biomechanical changes induced by substrate-specific endoglucanases. Plant Physiol. 2012, 158, 1933–1943.
  58. Hrmova, M; Farkaš, V.; Lahnstein, J.; Fincher, G.B. A barley xyloglucan xyloglucosyl transferase covalently links xyloglucan, cellulosic substrates, and (1,3;1,4)-β-d-glucans. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 283, 27344.
  59. Keegstra, K.; Talmadge, W.; Bauer, W.D.; Albersheim, P. The structure of plant cell walls. III. A model of the walls of suspension-cultured sycamore cells based on the interconnections of the macromolecular components. Plant Physiol. 1973, 51, 188–196.
  60. Carpita, N.C.; Gibeaut, D.M. Structural models of primary cell walls in flowering plants: Consistency of molecular structure with the physical properties of the walls during Plant J. 1993, 3, 1–30.
  61. Pauly, M; Albersheim, P.; Darvill, A.; York, W.S. Molecular domains of the cellulose/xyloglucan network in the cell walls of higher plants. Plant J. 1999, 20, 629–639.
  62. Chanliaud, E.; De Silva, J.; Strongitharm, B.; Jeronimidis, G.; Gidley, D. Mechanical effects of plant cell wall enzymes on cellulose/xyloglucan composites. Plant J. 2004, 38, 27–37.
  63. Chanliaud, E; Burrows, K.M.; Jeronimidis, G.; Gidley, M.J. Mechanical properties of primary plant cell wall analogues. Planta 2002, 215, 989–996.
  64. Cosgrove, J. Re-constructing our models of cellulose and primary cell wall assembly. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2014, 22, 122–131.
  65. Park, B.; Cosgrove, D.J. Xyloglucan and its interactions with other components of the growing cell wall. Plant Cell Physiol. 2015, 56, 180–194.
  66. Cosgrove, D.J. Diffuse growth of plant cell walls. Plant Physiol. 2018, 176, 16–27.
  67. Kuki, H; Yokoyama, R.; Kuroha, T.; Nishitani, K. Xyloglucan is not essential for the formation and integrity of the cellulose network in the primary cell wall regenerated from Arabidopsis protoplasts. Plants 2020, 9, 629.
  68. Scheible, R.; Pauly, M. Glycosyltransferases and cell wall biosynthesis: Novel players and insights. Curr. Opin. Plant. Biol. 2004, 7, 285–295.
  69. Burton, R.A.; Wilson, S.M.; Hrmova, M.; Harvey, J.; Shirley, N.J.; Medhurst, A.; Stone, B.A.; Newbigin, E.J.; Bacic, A.; Fincher, G.B. Cellulose synthase-like CslF genes mediate the synthesis of cell wall (1,3;1,4)-β-d-glucans. Science 2006, 311, 1940–1942.
  70. Qu, Y; Egelund, J.; Gilson, P.R.; Houghton, F.; Gleeson, P.A.; Schultz, C.J.; Bacic, A. Identification of a novel group of putative Arabidopsis thaliana β-(1,3)-galactosyltransferases. Plant Mol. Biol. 2008, 68, 43–59.
  71. Doblin, S.; Pettolino, F.A.; Wilson, S.M.; Campbell, R.; Burton, R.A.; Fincher, G.B.; Newbigin, E.; Bacic, A. A barley cellulose synthase-like CSLH gene mediates (1,3;1,4)-β-d-glucan synthesis in transgenic Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 5996–6001.
  72. Wu, -M.; Hörnblad, E.; Voxeur, A.; Gerber, L.; Rihouey, C.; Lerouge, P.; Marchant, A. Analysis of the Arabidopsis IRX9/IRX9-L and IRX14/IRX14-L pairs of glycosyltransferase genes reveals critical contributions to biosynthesis of the hemicellulose glucuronoxylan. Plant Physiol. 2010, 153, 542–554.
  73. Anders, N; Wilkinson, M.D.; Lovegrove, A.; Freeman, J.; Tryfona, T.; Pellny, T.K.; Weimar, T.; Mortimer, J.C.; Stott, K.; Baker, J.M.; et al. Glycosyl transferases in family 61 mediate arabinofuranosyl transfer ontoxylan in grasses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 17, 989–993.
  74. Hansen, F.; Harholt, J.; Oikawa, A.; Scheller, H.V. Plant glycosyl transferases beyond CAZy: A perspective on DUF families. Front. Plant Sci. 2012, 3, 59.
  75. Harholt, J.; Sørensen, I.; Fangel, J.U.; Roberts, A.; Willats, G.T.; Scheller, H.V.; Larsen, B.; Petersen, B.L.; Banks, J.A.; Ulvskov, P. The glycosyltransferase repertoire of the spikemoss Selaginella moellendorffii and a comparative study of the cell wall structure. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e35846.
  76. Zabotina, O.A.; Avci, U; Cavalier, D.; Pattathil, S.; Chou, Y.-H.; Eberhard, S.; Danhof, L.; Keegstra, K.; Hahn, M.G. Mutations in multiple XXT genes of Arabidopsis reveal the complexity of xyloglucan biosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 2012, 159, 1367–1384.
  77. Stonebloom, S; Ebert, B.; Xiong, G.; Pattathil, S.; Birdseye, D.; Lao, J.; Pauly, M.; Hahn, M.G.; Heazlewood, J.I.; Scheller, H.V. A DUF-246 family glycosyltransferase-like gene affects male fertility and the biosynthesis of pectic arabinogalactans. BMC Plant Biol. 2016, 16, 90.
  78. Zeng, W; Lampugnani, E.R.; Picard, K.L.; Song, L.L.; Wu, A.M.; Farion, I.M.; Zhao, J.; Ford, K.; Doblin, M.S.; Bacic, A. Asparagus IRX9, IRX10, and IRX14A are components of an active xylan backbone synthase complex that forms in the Golgi apparatus. Plant Physiol. 2016, 171, 93–109.
  79. Takenaka, Y; Kato, K.; Ogawa-Ohnishi, M.; Tsuruhama, K.; Kajiura, H.; Yagyu, K.; Tekeda, A.; Takeda, Y.; Kunieda, T.; Hara-Nishimura, I.; et al. Pectin RG-I rhamnosyl-transferases represent a novel plant-specific glycosyltransferase family. Nat. Plants 2018, 4, 669–676.
  80. Voiniciuc, C.; Engle, K.A.; Günl, M.; Dieluweit, S.; Schmidt, M.H.; Yang, J.Y.; Moremen, W.; Mohnen, D.; Usadel, B. Identification of key enzymes for pectin synthesis in seed mucilage. Plant Physiol. 2018, 178, 1045–1064.
  81. Amos, A.; Mohnen, D. Critical review of plant cell wall matrix polysaccharide glycosyltransferase activities verified by heterologous protein expression. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 915.
  82. Penning, W.; McCann, M.C.; Carpita, N.C. Evolution of the cell wall gene families of grasses. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1205.
  83. Yang, J; Bak, G.; Burgin, T.; Barnes, W.J.; Mayes, H.B.; Peña, M.J.; Urbanowicz, B.R.; Nielsen, E. Biochemical and genetic analysis Identify CSLD3 as a beta-1,4-glucan synthase that functions during plant cell wall synthesis. Plant Cell 2020, 32, 1749–1767.
  84. Wachananawat, B.; Kuroha, ; Takenaka, Y.; Kajiura, H.; Naramoto, S.; Yokoyama, R.; Ishizaki, K.; Nishitani, K.; Ishimizu, T. Diversity of pectin rhamnogalacturonan I rhamnosyltransferases in glycosyltransferase family 106. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 997.
  85. Dhugga, S. Biosynthesis of non-cellulosic polysaccharides of plant cell walls. Phytochemistry 2012, 74, 8–19.
  86. Roberts, W.; Roberts, E.M.; Delmer, D.P. Cellulose synthase (CesA) genes in the green alga Mesotaenium caldariorum. Eukaryot. Cell 2002, 1, 847–855.
  87. Roberts, W.; Roberts, E. Evolution of the Cellulose Synthase (CesA) Gene Family: Insights from Green Algae and Seedless Plants. In Cellulose: Molecular and structural Biology; Brown, R.M., Saxena, I.M., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2007; pp. 17–34.
  88. Yin, Y; Huang, J.; Xu, Y. The cellulose synthase superfamily in fully sequenced plants and algae. BMC Plant Biol. 2009, 9, 99.
  89. Endler, A; Persson, S. Cellulose synthases and synthesis in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 2011, 4, 199–211.
  90. Little, A; Schwerdt, J.G.; Shirley, N.J.; Khor, S.F.; Neumann, K.; O’Donovan, L.A.; Lahnstein, J.; Collins, H.M.; Henderson, M.; Fincher, J.B.; et al. Revised phylogeny of the cellulose synthase gene superfamily: Insights into cell wall evolution. Plant Physiol. 2018, 177, 1124–1141.
  91. Abercrombie, M.; O’Meara, B.C.; Moffatt, A.R.; Williams, J.H. Developmental evolution of flowering plant pollen tube cell walls: Callose synthase (CalS) gene expression patterns. EvoDevo 2011, 2, 14.
  92. Park, S; Szumlanski, A.L.; Gu, F.; Guo, F.; Nielsen, E. A role for CSLD3 during cell-wall synthesis in apical plasma membranes of tip-growing root-hair cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011, 13, 973–980.
  93. Cosgrove, D.J. Loosening of plant cell walls by expansins. Nature 2000, 407, 321–326.
  94. Lv, M.; Zuo, D.Y.; Wang, X.F.; Cheng, H.L.; Zhang, Y.P.; Wang, Q.L.; Song, G.L.; Ma, Z.Y. Genome-wide identification of the expansin gene family reveals that expansin genes are involved in fibre cell growth in cotton. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 223.
  95. Liu, W; Lyu, T.; Xu, L.; Hu, Z.; Xiong, X.; Liu, T.; Cao, J. Complex molecular evolution and expression of expansin gene families in three basic diploid species of Brassica. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3424.
  96. Herburger, K; Franková, L.; Picmanova, M.; Loh, J.W.; Valenzuela-Ortega, M.; Meulewaeter, F.; Hudson, A.D.; French, C.E.; Fry, S.C. Hetero-trans-β-Glucanase produces cellulose–xyloglucan covalent bonds in the cell walls of structural plant tissues and is stimulated by expansin. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 1047–1062.
  97. Willats, G.T.; Orfila, C.; Limberg, G.; Buchholt, H.C.; van Alebeek, G.-J.W.M.; Voragen, A.G.J.; Marcus, S.E.; Christensen, T.M.I.E.; Mikkelsen, J.D.; Murray, B.S.; et al. Modulation of the degree and pattern of methyl-esterification of pectic homogalacturonan in plant cell walls: Implications for pectin methylesterase action, matrix properties and cell adhesion. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 19404–19413.
  98. Wolf, ; Mouille, G.; Pelloux, J. Homogalacturonan methyl-esterification and plant development. Mol. Plant 2009, 2, 851–860.
  99. Franková, L.; Fry, C. Biochemistry and physiological roles of enzymes that ‘cut and paste’ plant cell-wall polysaccharides. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 3519–3550.
  100. Thompson, J.E.; Smith, R.C.; Fry, C. Xyloglucan undergoes interpolymeric transglycosylation during binding to the plant cell wall in vivo: Evidence from 13C/3H dual labelling and isopycnic centrifugation in caesium trifluoroacetate. Biochem. J. 1997, 327, 699–708.
  101. Campbell, P; Braam, J. Xyloglucan endotransglycosylases: Diversity of genes, enzymes and potential wall-modifying functions. Trends Plant Sci. 1999, 4, 361–366.
  102. Bourquin, V; Nishikubo, N.; Abe, H.; Brumer, H.; Denman, S.; Eklund, M.; Christiernin, M.; Teeri, T.T.; Sundberg, B.; Mellerowicz, E.J. Xyloglucan endotransglycosylases have a function during the formation of secondary cell walls of vascular tissues. Plant Cell 2002, 14, 3073–3088.
  103. Nishitani, Division of roles among members of the XTH gene family in plants. Plant Biosyst. 2005, 139, 98–101.
  104. Nishikubo, N; Takahashi, J.; Roos, A.A.; DerbaMaceluch, M.; Piens, K.; Brumer, H.; Teeri, T.T.; Stalbrand, H.; Mellerowicz, E.J. Xyloglucan endotransglycosylase-mediated xyloglucan rearrangements in developing wood of hybrid aspen. Plant Physiol. 2011, 155, 399–413.
  105. Farkaš, V; Sulová, Z.; Stratilová, E.; Hanna, R.; Maclachlan, G. Cleavage of xyloglucan by nasturtium seed xyloglucanase and transglycosylation to xyloglucan subunit oligosaccharides. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1992, 298, 365–370.
  106. Fry, S; Smith, R.; Renwick, K.; Martin, D.; Hodge, S.; Matthews, K. Xyloglucan endotransglycosylase, a new wall-loosening enzyme activity from plants. Biochem. J. 1992, 282, 821–828.
  107. Nishitani, K; Tominaga, R. Endo-xyloglucan transferase, a novel class of glycosyltransferase that catalyzes transfer of a segment of xyloglucan molecule to another xyloglucan molecule. J. Biol. Chem. 1992, 267, 21058–21064.
  108. Webb, C. Enzyme Nomenclature 1992: Recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology on the Nomenclature and Classification of Enzymes; Academic Press Inc: Harcourt Brace, Jovanovich Publishers: San Diego, CA, USA, 1992; ISBN 0-12-227164-5.
  109. Placzek, S.; Schomburg, I.; Chang, A.; Jeske, L.; Ulbrich, M.; Tillack, J.; Schomburg, D. BRENDA in 2017: New perspectives and new tools in BRENDA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, D380–D388.
  110. Rose, J.K.C.; Braam, J.; Fry, C.; Nishitani, K. The XTH family of enzymes involved in xyloglucan endotransglucosylation and endohydrolysis: Current perspectives and a new unifying nomenclature. Plant Cell Physiol. 2002, 43, 1421–1435.
  111. Atkinson, R.G.; Johnston, S.L.; Yauk, Y.K.; Sharma, N.N.; Schröder, R. Analysis of xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase (XTH) gene families in kiwifruit and apple. Postharvest Biol. 2009, 51, 149–157.
  112. Maris, A.; Suslov, D; Fry, S.C.; Verbelen, J.P.; Vissenberg, K. Enzymic characterization of two recombinant xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase (XTH) proteins of Arabidopsis and their effect on root growth and cell wall extension. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 3959–3972.
  113. Yokoyama, R.; Uwagaki, Y; Sasaki, H.; Harada, T.; Hiwatashi, Y.; Hasebe, M.; Nishitani, K. Biological implications of the occurrence of 32 members of the XTH (xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase) family of proteins in the bryophyte Physcomitrella patens. Plant J. 2010, 64, 645–656.
  114. Muñoz-Bertomeu, J.; Miedes, E.; Lorences, P. Expression of xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase (XTH) genes and XET activity in ethylene treated apple and tomato fruits. J. Plant Physiol. 2013, 170, 1194–1201.
  115. Shi, Z.; Zhu, X.F.; Miller, J.G.; Gregson, T.; Zheng, S.J.; Fry, S.C. Distinct catalytic capacities of two aluminium-repressed Arabidopsis thaliana xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolases, XTH15 and XTH31, heterologously produced in Pichia. Phytochemistry 2015, 112, 160–169.
  116. Fu, M.; Liu, C.; Wu, F. Genome-wide identification, characterization and expression analysis of xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase genes family in barley (Hordeum vulgare). Molecules 2019, 24, 1935.
  117. Holland, C.; Simmons, J.; Meulewaeter, F.; Hudson, A.; Fry, S.C. Three highly acidic Equisetum XTHs differ from hetero-trans-β-glucanase in donor substrate specificity and are predominantly xyloglucan homo-transglucosylases. J. Plant Physiol. 2020, 251, 153210.
  118. Baran, R.; Sulová, Z.; Stratilová, E.; Farkaš, Ping-Pong character of nasturtium-seed xyloglucan endotransglycosylase (XET) Reaction. Gen. Physiol. Biophys. 2000, 19, 427–440.
  119. Saura-Valls, M.; Faure, R.; Ragas, S.; Piens, K.; Brumer, H; Teeri, T.T.; Cottaz, S.; Driguez, H.; Planas, A. Kinetic analysis using low-molecular mass xyloglucan oligosaccharides defines the catalytic mechanism of a Populus xyloglucan endotransglycosylase. Biochem. J. 2006, 395, 99–106.
  120. Ait Mohand, F; Farkaš, V. Screening for hetero-transglycosylating activities in extracts from nasturtium (Tropaeolum majus). Carbohydr. Res. 2006, 34, 577–581.
  121. Hrmova, M.; Farkaš, V; Harvey, A.J.; Lahnstein, J.; Wischmann, B.; Kaewthai, N.; Ezcurra, I.; Teeri, T.T.; Fincher, G.B. Substrate specificity and catalytic mechanism of a xyloglucan xyloglucosyl transferase HvXET6 from barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). FEBS J. 2009, 276, 437–456.
  122. Shinohara, N.; Sunagawa, N.; Tamura, S; Yokoyama, R.; Ueda, M.; Igarashi, K.; Nishitani, K. The plant cell-wall enzyme AtXTH3 catalyses covalent cross-linking between cellulose and cello-oligosaccharide. Nat. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 46099–46108.
  123. Stratilová, ; Firáková, Z.; Klaudiny, J.; Šesták, S.; Kozmon, S.; Strouhalová, D.; Garajová, S.; Ait-Mohand, F.; Horváthová, Á.; Farkaš, V.; et al. Engineering the acceptor substrate specificity in the xyloglucan endotransglycosylase TmXET6.3 from nasturtium seeds (Tropaeolum majus L.). Plant Mol. Biol. 2019, 100, 181–197.
  124. Herburger, K.; Franková, L.; Sanhueza, D.; Roig-Sanchez, S.; Meulewaeter, ; Hudson, A.; Thomson, A.; Laromaine, A.; Budtova, T.; Fry, S.C. Enzymically attaching oligosaccharide-linked ‘cargoes’ to cellulose and other commercial polysaccharides via stable covalent bonds. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 164, 4359–4369.
  125. Stratilová, B; Šesták, S.; Mravec, J.; Garajová, S.; Pakanová, Z.; Vadinová, K.; Kucˇerová, D.; Kozmon, S.; Schwerdt, J.G.; Shirley, N.; et al. Another building block in the plant cell wall: Barley xyloglucan xyloglucosyl transferases link covalently xyloglucan and anionic oligosaccharides derived from pectin. Plant J. 2020, 104, 752–767.
  126. Lombard, V; Golaconda Ramulu, H.; Drula, E.; Coutinho, P.M.; Henrissat, B. The carbohydrate-active enzymes database (CAZy) in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, D490–D495.
  127. Johansson, P; Brumer, H.; Baumann, M.J.; Kallas, A.M.; Henriksson, H.; Denman, S.E.; Teeri, T.T.T.; Jones, T.A. Crystal structures of a poplar xyloglucan endotransglycosylase reveal details of transglycosylation acceptor binding. Plant Cell 2004, 16, 874–886.
  128. Hrmova, M; MacGregor, E.A.; Biely, P.; Stewart, R.J.; Fincher, G.B. Substrate binding and catalytic mechanism of a barley β-d-glucosidase/(1,4)-β-d-glucan exohydrolase. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 11134–11143.
  129. Schröder, ; Wegrzyn, T.F.; Sharma, N.N.; Atkinson, R.G. LeMAN4 endo-beta-mannanase from ripe tomato fruit can act as a mannan transglycosylase or hydrolase. Planta 2006, 224, 1091–1102.
  130. Schröder, R.; Atkinson, R.G.; Redgwell, R.J. Re-interpreting the role of endo-β-mannanases as mannan endotransglycosylase/hydrolases in the plant cell wall. Bot. 2009, 104, 197–204.
  131. Franková, L.; Fry, C. Phylogenetic variation in glycosidases and glycanases acting on plant cell wall polysaccharides, and the detection of transglycosidase and trans-β-xylanase activities. Plant J. 2011, 67, 662–681.
  132. Johnston, S; Prakash, R.; Chen, N.J.; Kumagai, M.H.; Turano, H.M.; Cooney, J.M.; Atkinson, R.G.; Paull, R.E.; Cheetamun, R.; Bacic, A.; et al. An enzyme activity capable of endotransglycosylation of heteroxylan polysaccharides is present in plant primary cell walls. Planta 2013, 237, 173–187.
  133. Derba-Maceluch, M; Awano, T.; Takahashi, J.; Lucenius, J.; Ratke, C.; Kontro, I.; Busse-Wicher, M.; Kosík, O.; Tanaka, R.; Winzéll, A.; et al. Suppression of xylan endotransglycosylase PtxtXyn10A affects cellulose microfibril angle in secondary wall in aspen wood. New Phytol. 2015, 205, 666–681.
  134. Fry, C.; Mohler, K.E.; Nesselrode, B.H.W.A.; Franková, L. Mixed-linkage β-glucan:xyloglucan endotransglucosylase, a novel wall-remodelling enzyme from Equisetum (horsetails) and charophytic algae. Plant J. 2008, 55, 240–252.
  135. Mohler, K.E.; Simmons, J.; Fry, S.C. Mixed-linkage glucan:xyloglucan endotransglucosylase (MXE) re-models hemicelluloses in Equisetum shoots but not in barley shoots or Equisetum callus. New Phytol. 2013, 197, 111–122.
  136. Simmons, J.; Mohler, K.E.; Holland, C.; Goubet, F.; Franková, L.; Houston, D.R.; Hudson, A.D.; Meulewaeter, F.; Fry, S.C. Hetero-trans-β-glucanase, an enzyme unique to Equisetum plants, functionalizes cellulose. Plant J. 2015, 83, 753–769.
  137. Viborg, A.H.; Terrapon, N.; Lombard, V; Michel, G.; Gurvan, M.; Czjzek, M.; Henrissat, B.; Brumer, H. A subfamily roadmap for functional glycogenomics of the evolutionarily diverse Glycoside Hydrolase Family 16 (GH16). J. Biol. Chem. 2019, 294, 15973–15986.
  138. Baumann, M.J.; Eklöf, J.M.; Michel, G.; Kallas, A.M.; Teeri, T.; Czjzek, M.; Brumer, H. Structural evidence for the evolution of xyloglucanase activity from xyloglucan endo-transglycosylases: Biological implications for cell wall metabolism. Plant Cell 2007, 19, 1947–1963.
  139. Eklöf, J.M.; Brumer, The XTH gene family: An update on enzyme structure, function, and phylogeny in xyloglucan remodeling. Plant Physiol. 2010, 153, 456–466.
  140. Mark, P; Baumann, M.J.; Eklöf, J.M.; Gullfot, F.; Michel, G.; Kallas, A.M.; Teeri, T.T.; Brumer, H.; Czjek, M. Analysis of nasturtium TmNXG1 complexes by crystallography and molecular dynamics provides detailed insight into substrate recognition by family GH16 xyloglucan endo-transglycosylases and endo-hydrolases. Proteins 2009, 75, 820–836.
  141. Kumar, S; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874.
  142. Vaaje-Kolstad, G.; Farkaš, V; Fincher, G.B.; Hrmova, M. Barley xyloglucan xyloglucosyl transferases bind xyloglucan-derived oligosaccharides in their acceptor-binding regions in multiple conformational states. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2010, 496, 61–68.
  143. McGregor, ;N Yin, V.; Tung, C.C.; Van Petegem, F.; Brumer, H. Crystallographic insight into the evolutionary origins of xyloglucan endotransglycosylases and endohydrolases. Plant J. 2017, 89, 651–670.
  144. Kaewthai, N.; Harvey, J.; Hrmova, M.; Brumer, H.; Ezcurra, I.; Teeri, T.T.; Fincher, G.B. Heterologous expression of diverse barley XTH genes in the yeast Pichia pastoris. Plant Biotechnol. 2010, 27, 251–258.
  145. Behar, H; Graham, S.W.; Brumer, H. Comprehensive cross-genome survey and phylogeny of glycoside hydrolase family 16 members reveals the evolutionary origin of EG 16 and XTH proteins in plant lineages. Plant J. 2018, 95, 1114–1128.
  146. Fry, C. Novel ’dot-blot’ assays for glycosyltransferases and glycosylhydrolases: Optimization for xyloglucan endotransglycosylase (XET) activity. Plant J. 1997, 11, 1141–1150.
  147. Farkaš, V; Ait-Mohand, F.; Stratilová, E. Sensitive detection of transglycosylating activity of xyloglucan endotransglycosylase/hydrolase (XTH) after isoelectric focusing in polyacrylamide gels. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2005, 43, 431–435.
  148. Garajová, V; Flodrová, D.; Ait-Mohand, F.; Farkaš, V.; Stratilová, E. Characterization of two partially purified xyloglucan endotransglycosylases from parsley (Petroselinum crispum) roots. Biologia 2008, 63, 313–319.
  149. Kosík, O.; Auburn, P.; Russell, S.; Stratilová, E.; Garajová, S.; Hrmova, M.; Farkaš, V. Polysaccharide microarrays for high-throughput screening of transglycosylase activities in plant extracts. Glycoconj. J. 2010, 27, 79–87.
  150. Vissenberg, K; Martinez-Vilchez, I.M.; Verbelen, J.P.; Miller, J.G.; Fry, S.C. In vivo colocalization of xyloglucan endotransglycosylase activity and its donor substrate in the elongation zone of Arabidopsis roots. Plant Cell 2000, 12, 1229–1237.
  151. Nishikubo, N.; Awano, T; Banasiak, A.; Bourquin, V.; Ibatullin, F.; Funada, R.; Brumer, H.; Teeri, T.T.; Hayashi, T.; Sundberg, B.; et al. Xyloglucan endo-transglycosylase (XET) functions in gelatinous layers of tension wood fibers in poplar—A glimpse into the mechanism of the balancing act of trees. Plant Cell Phys. 2007, 48, 843–855.
  152. Ibatullin, M.; Banasiak, A.; Baumann, M.J.; Greffe, L.; Takahashi, J.; Mellerowicz, E.J.; Brumer, H.A. Real-time fluorogenic assay for the visualization of glycoside hydrolase activity in planta. Plant Phys. 2009, 151, 1741–1750.
  153. Mravec, ; Kracˇun, S.K.; Rydahl, M.G.; Westereng, B.; Miart, F.; Clausen, M.H.; Fangel, J.U.; Daugaard, M.; Van Cutsem, P.; De Fine Licht, H.H.; et al. Tracking developmentally regulated post-synthetic processing of homogalacturonan and chitin using reciprocal oligosaccharide probes. Development 2014, 141, 4841–4850.
  154. Vaaje-Kolstad, G.; Farkaš, V; Hrmova, M.; Fincher, G.B. Xyloglucan xyloglucosyl transferases from barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) bind oligomeric and polymeric xyloglucan molecules in their acceptor binding sites. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2010, 1800, 674–684.
  155. Kosík, O; Garajová, S.; Matulová, M.; Rˇehulka, P.; Stratilová, E.; Farkaš, V. Effect of the label of oligosaccharide acceptors on the kinetic parameters of nasturtium seed xyloglucan endotransglycosylase (XET). Carbohydr. Res. 2011, 346, 357–361.
  156. Sulová, Z.; Lednická, M.; Farkaš, V. A colorimetric assay for xyloglucan endotransglycosylase from germinating seeds. Anal. Biochem. 1995, 229, 80–85.
More
Information
Contributors MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://encyclopedia.pub/register : , , ,
View Times: 946
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 03 Dec 2020
1000/1000