1. Please check and comment entries here.
Table of Contents

    Topic review

    Honey in Advanced Wound Care

    View times: 7


    The clinical considerations in wound-healing management include preventing and controlling the infection and/or contamination, maintaining the adequate moisture environment, treating edema, and preventing further injury. Conventional chronic wound care involves debridement to remove non-viable tissue and bacterial biofilms, followed by wound dressing. The common wound dressings consist of a standard cotton bandage or highly absorbent dressings, such as collagen and alginate, or hydrocolloids; however, this procedure of wound care is often ineffective.

    1. Introduction

    Prolonged chronicity of wounds is normally related to a bacterial injured-tissue colonization, which can progress into a bacterial resistance to topical and systemic antimicrobial agents, or into biofilm development, which complicates, in both cases, their treatment [1]. In the end, this type of wound can cause sepsis and inflammation in organs and lead to increased morbidity and mortality.

    Several case studies and randomized controlled trials provide considerable evidence of the effectiveness of honey in healing different types of wounds, such as amputation wounds, burns, skin grafting sites, skin lesions, or skin ulcers including leg, varicose, malignant, diabetic, and sickle cell ulcers [2][3][4][5].

    However, the use of honey by itself might present some limitations which are being overcome with the development of different honey formulations and honey wound dressings.

    This encyclopedia entry aims to highlight the mechanism of honey’s action in wound healing and gather the literature available regarding the use of honey and modern engineering templates for promoting modern solutions for wound and skin healing and regeneration.

    2. The Mechanisms of Honey in Wound and Burn Healing

    Several studies have demonstrated, in vitro and in vivo, the efficacy of different varieties of honey against a broad spectrum of bacteria, including those that commonly caused wound and burn infections, such as Staphylococcus aureus , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Escherichia coli , Acinetobacter baumannii , or Staphylococcus epidermidis [1][5][6][7][8][9]. In addition, honey has also been demonstrated to be effective against antibiotic-resistant bacteria [10][11][12][13], as well as against biofilms by preventing the formation and the development of the biofilm [14][15][16][17][18], by reducing the metabolic activity of already formed biofilms [15][19], or by altering the gene expression of different genes related to the formation and the development of biofilms [19][20], and is related to the bacterial quorum sensing [20][21].

    Another advantage of the anti-inflammatory action of honey is the decrease in edema, thus reducing the pressure on the microvasculature of wound tissue that allows the availability of oxygen and nutrients required for growth of tissue and wound repair [22]. This effect also allows the control of the wounds’ exudate with an appropriate moisture balance, which is still a constant challenge in the healing processes [8].

    The anti-inflammatory activity of honey has been mainly attributed to phenolic compounds [23][24]. However, until now, no correlation was found between the level of anti-inflammatory activity in different honey samples and the phenolic compound content [25], which might be due to the distinct types of interactions that can occur among these compounds and other compounds present in honey.

    On the contrary, another study has demonstrated the anti-angiogenic activity of honey is mediated by the modulation of prostaglandin E 2 and VEGF production [26]. This disparity among studies might be explained by the honey concentration tested, since the highest pro-angiogenic effect was found in a low concentration of honey, whereas higher concentrations demonstrated anti-angiogenic activity [27].

    3. Safety of Honey Used for Topical Treatment

    The extensive scientific evidence proves that honey may offer distinct advantages over the chemotherapeutic substances currently used in the wound- and burn- healing processes. However, this natural product shows a series of limitations, and is not completely free from adverse effects.

    The composition of honey is rather variable, depending primarily on the botanical origin, and secondarily on other factors such as geographical origin, or harvesting, processing, and storage conditions [7][8]. This variability determines its bioactive properties, and consequently influences the therapeutic efficacy of the wound treatment [8]. In addition, the absence of standardization and the incomplete knowledge of the active components, and the mechanisms through which they interact and act in wound healing, are the major limitations for the application of honey in medicine. For this reason, is essential to select the more appropriate varieties of honey, and it is recommended to carry out a previous screening [7].

    In addition, other considerations must be considered before honey application in wounds. The low pH, derived from the presence of organic acids in honey, may contribute to a stinging or burning sensation when it is applied to a damaged tissue [28]. Besides this unpleasant sensation, it is necessary to consider that, although minor, there is a risk of wound infection, mainly related to the presence of clostridial spores which have occasionally been found in honey [8][29]. This risk can be reduced by using gamma-irradiation, which inactivates the spores without modifying the original biological activity [30][31]. Nevertheless, no cases of wound infection due to clostridial spores related to the use of non-irradiated honey on wounds have been reported to date.

    Furthermore, the honey used for medical purposes must be free of any chemical contamination, such as pesticides, herbicides, or heavy metals. In this sense, to guarantee the maximum purity, honey should be collected in areas that meet the requirements for organic production, as well as following rigorous quality, processing and storage standards [32][10]. In addition, is necessary to consider that some varieties of honey might present toxic active compounds originating from the nectar of species such as rhododendron, oleanders, mountain and sheep laurels, or azaleas. However, these effects have been described by honey ingestion [33][34].

    4. Biomedical Application of Honey in Advanced Wound Care

    The FDA-approved honey-based devices are indicated in the treatment of different types of wounds, such as low and moderate-to-heavy exuding wounds, diabetic foot ulcers, leg ulcers, pressure ulcers, burns, traumatic wounds, surgical wounds, chronic wounds, or colonized acute wounds, among other indications [5]. Despite the availability of these products, their use in medical practice is still limited, probably due to the misconception that there is no evidence to support the use of honey with therapeutic purposes, as well as the scarce promotion and diffusion of honey products for wound care [22].

    The medical-grade honey, as well as the ointments and gels, is applied to the wound bed and requires a secondary conventional dressing (e.g., cotton wool bandage) to contain the honey in the wound bed environment, which on removal cause pain [35].

    Tissue engineering has recently introduced wound dressings/scaffolds as an alternative treatment of wounds with advanced properties, suitable for keeping a moist environment while absorbing exudates, creating a barrier against pathogens, and facilitating drug delivery systems [36].

    In addition, hydrogel wound scaffolds containing honey do not function merely as coverage to provide a clean, moist environment for healing, but also directly contribute to enhanced tissue regeneration and recovery [37].

    The entry is from 10.3390/molecules26164784


    1. Molan, P.; Rhodes, T. Honey: A Biologic Wound Dressing. Wounds 2015, 27, 141–151.
    2. Jull, A.; Walker, N.; Parag, V.; Molan, P.; Rodgers, A. Randomized Clinical Trial of Honey-Impregnated Dressings for Venous Leg Ulcers. Br. J. Surg. 2008, 95, 175–182.
    3. Smaropoulos, E.; Cremers, N.A.J. Treating Severe Wounds in Pediatrics with Medical Grade Honey: A Case Series. Clin. Case Rep. 2020, 8, 469–476.
    4. Alam, F.; Islam, M.A.; Gan, S.H.; Khalil, M.I. Honey: A Potential Therapeutic Agent for Managing Diabetic Wounds. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2014, 2014, 169130.
    5. Hixon, K.R.; Klein, R.C.; Eberlin, C.T.; Linder, H.R.; Ona, W.J.; Gonzalez, H.; Sell, S.A. A Critical Review and Perspective of Honey in Tissue Engineering and Clinical Wound Healing. Adv. Wound Care 2019, 8, 403–415.
    6. Molan, P.C. Honey: Antimicrobial Actions and Role in Disease Management. In New Strategies Combating Bacterial Infection; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA: Weinheim, Germany, 2009; pp. 229–253. ISBN 9783527322060.
    7. Combarros-Fuertes, P.; Estevinho, L.M.; Dias, L.G.; Castro, J.M.; Tomás-Barberán, F.A.; Tornadijo, M.E.; Fresno-Baro, J.M. Bioactive Components and Antioxidant and Antibacterial Activities of Different Varieties of Honey: A Screening Prior to Clinical Application. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 688–698.
    8. Krishnakumar, G.S.; Mahendiran, B.; Gopalakrishnan, S.; Muthusamy, S.; Malarkodi Elangovan, S. Honey Based Treatment Strategies for Infected Wounds and Burns: A Systematic Review of Recent Pre-Clinical Research. Wound Med. 2020, 30, 100188.
    9. Sukur, S.M.; Halim, A.S.; Singh, K.K.B. Evaluations of Bacterial Contaminated Full Thickness Burn Wound Healing in Sprague Dawley Rats Treated with Tualang Honey. Indian J. Plast. Surg. 2011, 44, 112–117.
    10. Nair, H.K.R.; Tatavilis, N.; Pospíšilová, I.; Kučerová, J.; Cremers, N.A.J. Medical-Grade Honey Kills Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria and Prevents Amputation in Diabetics with Infected Ulcers: A Prospective Case Series. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 529.
    11. Natarajan, S.; Williamson, D.; Grey, J.; Harding, K.G.; Cooper, R.A. Healing of an MRSA-Colonized, Hydroxyurea-Induced Leg Ulcer with Honey. J. Dermatol. Treat. 2001, 12, 33–36.
    12. Gethin, G.; Cowman, S. Bacteriological Changes in Sloughy Venous Leg Ulcers Treated with Manuka Honey or Hydrogel: An RCT. J. Wound Care 2008, 17, 241–247.
    13. Johnson, D.W.; Van Eps, C.; Mudge, D.W.; Wiggins, K.J.; Armstrong, K.; Hawley, C.M.; Campbell, S.B.; Isbel, N.M.; Nimmo, G.R.; Gibbs, H. Randomized, Controlled Trial of Topical Exit-Site Application of Honey (Medihoney) versus Mupirocin for the Prevention of Catheter-Associated Infections in Hemodialysis Patients. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2005, 16, 1456–1462.
    14. Proaño, A.; Coello, D.; Villacrés-Granda, I.; Ballesteros, I.; Debut, A.; Vizuete, K.; Brenciani, A.; Álvarez-Suarez, J.M. The Osmotic Action of Sugar Combined with Hydrogen Peroxide and Bee-Derived Antibacterial Peptide Defensin-1 Is Crucial for the Antibiofilm Activity of Eucalyptus Honey. LWT 2021, 136, 110379.
    15. Sindi, A.; Chawn, M.V.B.; Hernandez, M.E.; Green, K.; Islam, M.K.; Locher, C.; Hammer, K. Anti-Biofilm Effects and Characterisation of the Hydrogen Peroxide Activity of a Range of Western Australian Honeys Compared to Manuka and Multifloral Honeys. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1–7.
    16. Cooper, R.; Jenkins, L.; Rowlands, R. Inhibition of Biofilms through the Use of Manuka Honey. Wounds 2011, 7, 24–32.
    17. Maddocks, S.E.; Lopez, M.S.; Rowlands, R.S.; Cooper, R.A. Manuka Honey Inhibits the Development of Streptococcus Pyogenes Biofilms and Causes Reduced Expression of Two Fibronectin Binding Proteins. Microbiology 2012, 158, 781–790.
    18. Merckoll, P.; Jonassen, T.Ø.; Vad, M.E.; Jeansson, S.L.; Melby, K.K. Bacteria, Biofilm and Honey: A Study of the Effects of Honey on “planktonic” and Biofilm-Embedded Chronic Wound Bacteria. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 2009, 41, 341–347.
    19. Kot, B.; Sytykiewicz, H.; Sprawka, I.; Witeska, M. Effect of Manuka Honey on Biofilm-Associated Genes Expression during Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Biofilm Formation. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 13552.
    20. Wasfi, R.; Elkhatib, W.F.; Khairalla, A.S. Effects of Selected Egyptian Honeys on the Cellular Ultrastructure and the Gene Expression Profile of Escherichia Coli. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0150984.
    21. Truchado, P.; López-Gálvez, F.; Gil, M.I.; Tomás-Barberán, F.A.; Allende, A. Quorum Sensing Inhibitory and Antimicrobial Activities of Honeys and the Relationship with Individual Phenolics. Food Chem. 2009, 115, 1337–1344.
    22. Molan, P.C. The Evidence and the Rationale for the Use of Honey. Wound Pract. Res. 2011, 19, 204–220.
    23. Silva, B.; Biluca, F.C.; Gonzaga, L.V.; Fett, R.; Dalmarco, E.M.; Caon, T.; Costa, A.C.O. In Vitro Anti-Inflammatory Properties of Honey Flavonoids: A Review. Food Res. Int. 2021, 141, 110086.
    24. Kassim, M.; Achoui, M.; Mustafa, M.R.; Mohd, M.A.; Yusoff, K.M. Ellagic Acid, Phenolic Acids, and Flavonoids in Malaysian Honey Extracts Demonstrate in Vitro Anti-Inflammatory Activity. Nutr. Res. 2010, 30, 650–659.
    25. Leong, A.G.; Herst, P.M.; Harper, J.L. Indigenous New Zealand Honeys Exhibit Multiple Anti-Inflammatory Activities. Innate Immun. 2011, 18, 459–466.
    26. Eteraf-Oskouei, T.; Najafi, M.; Gharehbagheri, A. Natural Honey: A New and Potent Anti-Angiogenic Agent in the Air-Pouch Model of Inflammation. Drug Res. 2013, 64, 530–536.
    27. Rossiter, K.; Cooper, A.J.; Voegeli, D.; Lwaleed, B.A. Honey Promotes Angiogeneic Activity in the Rat Aortic Ring Assay. J. Wound Care 2010, 19, 440–446.
    28. Oluwatosin, O.M.; Olabanji, J.K.; Oluwatosin, O.A.; Tijani, L.A.; Onyechi, H.U. A Comparison of Topical Honey and Phenytoin in the Treatment of Chronic Leg Ulcers. Afr. J. Med. Med Sci. 2000, 29, 31–34.
    29. Kwakman, P.H.S.; Zaat, S.A.J. Antibacterial Components of Honey. IUBMB Life 2012, 64, 48–55.
    30. Horniackova, M.; Bucekova, M.; Valachova, I.; Majtan, J. Effect of Gamma Radiation on the Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Activity of Honeydew Honey. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2017, 243, 81–88.
    31. Molan, P.C.; Allen, K.L. The Effect of Gamma-Irradiation on the Antibacterial Activity of Honey. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1996, 48, 1206–1209.
    32. Combarros-Fuertes, P.; Fresno, J.M.; Estevinho, M.M.; Sousa-Pimenta, M.; Tornadijo, M.E.; Estevinho, L.M. Honey: Another Alternative in the Fight against Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria? Antibiotics 2020, 9, 774.
    33. Gunduz, A.; Turedi, S.; Oksuz, H. The Honey, the Poison, the Weapon. Wilderness Environ. Med. 2011, 22, 182–184.
    34. Gunduz, A.; Turedi, S.; Russell, R.M.; Ayaz, F.A. Clinical Review of Grayanotoxin/Mad Honey Poisoning Past and Present. Clin. Toxicol. 2008, 46, 437–442.
    35. Rezvani Ghomi, E.; Khalili, S.; Nouri Khorasani, S.; Esmaeely Neisiany, R.; Ramakrishna, S. Wound Dressings: Current Advances and Future Directions. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2019, 136, 1–12.
    36. Negut, I.; Dorcioman, G.; Grumezescu, V. Scaffolds for Wound Healing Applications. Polymers 2020, 12, 2010.
    37. Wang, T.; Zhu, X.K.; Xue, X.T.; Wu, D.Y. Hydrogel Sheets of Chitosan, Honey and Gelatin as Burn Wound Dressings. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 88, 75–83.