IgY-based antivenoms: History Edit

Therapy of snakebite envenoming is based on the use of antisera which are mainly produced from horses. An alternative to mammal polyclonal antibodies is the use of IgY - immunoglobulins from egg yolk. IgY technology not only has economical and productive advantages but also follows the 3Rs concept in animal experimentation as proposed by the ECVAM and the WHO. In this project we produced, characterized and assessed the efficacy of IgY antivenom against Bothrops alternatus (yarará snake).

 

 

Introduction

Antivenoms are considered essential medicines for treating snakebite envenomings. Conventional production is based on the immunization f large animals, mainly horses, with mixtures of representative venoms of a determined geographical area. The hyperimmune plasma obtained after immunization is followed by fractionation methods  [1]. In
order to guarantee a good quality of the antivenom, purification steps and control of infectious risks are mandatory assessments. Nevertheless, equine-derived antivenoms usually induce dose-related early and delayed anaphylactic reactions in patients, such as serum sickness which produce vasculitis, glomerulonephritis and arthritis [2]On the other hand, antivenom production still remains a high-cost process leading to a global ongoing reduction in the manufacturers. Since snakebite envenoming remains a global health issue and has been recently included into Category A of Neglected Tropical Diseases by the World Health Organization, great efforts are needed to provide availability of these complex biological medicines in the primary health-care system.

IgY-Technology not only has economical and productive advantages but also follows the 3Rs concept in animal experimentation. In Costa Rica, Navarro et al. (2016) compared
the animal maintenance costs, procedures and supplies needed to keep horses and hens showing that the production prime cost can be reduced around a 40%[3]. Furthermore, sampling is non-invasive since the bleeding of the animal is replaced by egg collection, and therefore pain and distress of animals are sensibly reduced.

 

 

 

[4]

References

  1. José María Gutiérrez; Juan J. Calvete; Abdulrazaq G. Habib; Robert A. Harrison; David J. Williams; David A. Warrell; Snakebite envenoming. Nature Reviews Disease Primers 2017, 3, 17063, 10.1038/nrdp.2017.63.
  2. Andreas H. Laustsen; José María Gutiérrez; Cecilie Knudsen; Kristoffer H. Johansen; Erick Bermúdez Méndez; Felipe A. Cerni; Jonas A. Jürgensen; Line Ledsgaard; Andrea Martos Esteban; Mia Øhlenschlæger; et al.Urska PusMikael R. AndersenBruno LomonteMikael EngmarkManuela B. Pucca Pros and cons of different therapeutic antibody formats for recombinant antivenom development. Toxicon 2018, 146, 151-175, 10.1016/j.toxicon.2018.03.004.
  3. Diego Navarro; Mariángela Vargas; María Herrera; Álvaro Segura; Aarón Gómez; Mauren Villalta; Nils Ramírez; David Williams; José María Gutiérrez; Guillermo León; et al. Development of a chicken-derived antivenom against the taipan snake (Oxyuranus scutellatus) venom and comparison with an equine antivenom. Toxicon 2016, 120, 1-8, 10.1016/j.toxicon.2016.06.018.
  4. Carlos Leónidas Leiva; Adriana Cangelosi; Virginia Mariconda; Mariano Farace; Patricia Geoghegan; Luisa Brero; Mariano Fernández-Miyakawa; Pablo Chacana; IgY-based antivenom against Bothrops alternatus: Production and neutralization efficacy. Toxicon 2019, 163, 84-92, 10.1016/j.toxicon.2019.03.020.
More