Summary

Dear Colleagues,

Since Piaget's groundbreaking insights into how students make sense of physical phenomena and the influential ideas of Bachelard and Kuhn, a surge of exciting research has followed. Science educators now eagerly examine real classroom challenges at every level, from elementary school to university. Posner and Hewson, inspired by Kuhn, sparked a new discussion with their lively model of conceptual change, shedding light on why learners hang onto prescientific ideas. Researchers now use terms like 'alternative conceptions,' 'misconceptions,' 'representations' and 'intuitive theory' to describe these persistent beliefs. Alongside the conceptual change movement, multifaceted theories have emerged regarding the transition of students' thinking toward reasoning that is consistent and compatible with school scientific knowledge. Concepts such as modelling, argumentation, inquiry-based learning and teaching, narration, ... were the focus of research and practices.

According to this dynamic perspective, science learning is an active journey of conceptual shifts. Despite a treasure trove of studies, achieving consistently meaningful science learning remains elusive. To close this gap, many recent studies urge us to boldly connect research to vibrant classroom practice.

We invite authors to submit studies on the development of teaching strategies. Published authors can showcase innovative, research-driven approaches that combine student comprehension and conceptual change.

Submissions should clearly state potential applications or adaptations within science education. Highly recommend reading works that present a review of published research on the application of the conceptual change model in teaching science.

Expand All
Editors

Institution: Faculté des Sciences de L’éducation, Département de Didactique, Université du Québec à Montréal, P.O. Box 8888, Succursale Centre-Ville, Montréal, QC H3C 3P8, Canada

Interests: conceptual conflict; physics education; geometrization of the structure of matter; history of science in education; integration of mathematics and physics; constructivist teaching strategies; computer technologies in education; universality of scientific representations

Institution: Department of Educational Sciences and Early Childhood Education, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece

Interests: construction of scientific knowledge and activities that facilitate the understanding of science at all levels of schooling; teachers' training

Entry
Topic Review Peer Reviewed
Digital Scaffolding and Active Learning Strategies for Self-Regulated Learning in STEM Higher Education: A Systematic Review
This systematic review examines recent research on self-regulated learning (SRL) in STEM disciplines in higher education, with particular emphasis on the pedagogical and technological factors that support its development. Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, 26 indexed and peer-reviewed studies published between 2022 and 2025 in Web of Science and Scopus were analyzed. Thematic and bibliometric analyses were conducted to identify the main research trends, theoretical frameworks, and forms of pedagogical and technological mediation. The findings suggest an asymmetrical pattern within the reviewed corpus. Although active learning and digital technologies, including learning analytics, simulations, and AI-supported tools, are increasingly used in STEM education, the evidence does not consistently demonstrate a transfer from externally scaffolded regulation to sustained learner autonomy. Cognitive-constructivist and problem-based learning frameworks were more frequently represented within the reviewed corpus, whereas co-regulated and socially shared regulation frameworks were less frequently addressed. The findings further suggest that technological sophistication alone does not consistently support SRL; rather, its contribution appears to be closely associated with the pedagogical functions assigned to digital tools and their integration into learning activities. Finally, the review identifies tensions between externally guided regulation and sustained learner autonomy, as well as concerns related to unequal access, participation, and support in STEM education.
  • 33
  • 05 Nov 2026
>>