Musical Stimulation on Placental Programming of Preterm Infants: History
View Latest Version
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Contributor:
Olimpia Pino
,
Sofia Di Pietro
,
Diana Poli

The fetal environment is modulated by the placenta, which integrates and transduces information from the maternal environment to the fetal developmental program and adapts rapidly to changes through epigenetic mechanisms that respond to internal (hereditary) and external (environmental and social) signals. Consequently, the fetus corrects the trajectory of own development. During the last trimester of gestation, plasticity shapes the fetal brain, and prematurity can alter the typical developmental trajectories. Prenatal music stimulation had positive effects on fetus, newborn, and pregnant mother while post-natal exposure affected the neurodevelopment of the preterm infants and parental interaction.

  • epigenetic
  • fetal development
  • prenatal maternal stress
  • music
  • premature newborns

1. Introduction

The prenatal period must be properly deemed to fully understand the development of the central nervous system (CNS) [1]. The intrauterine signals influence brain structure, cognitive and motor function, and emotional regulation in the offspring [1]. Adverse events in the early stages of development could have lasting consequences on the individual structure, physiology, and metabolism according to the phenomenon of “fetal programming” [2]. The Predictive Adaptive Response (PAR) model suggests that the developing organism makes adjustment based on predictions of the postnatal environment [3][4][5]. A maternal depression among the prenatal period, for example, leads the fetus to habituate and to “adjust” the trajectory of her/his development during the first year of life [6][7]. The fetal environment is modulated by the placenta, which integrates and transduces information from the maternal environment to the fetal developmental program rapidly adapting to changes through epigenetic mechanisms [8] that respond to internal (hereditary) and external (environmental and social) signals. As a result, fetal behaviors can epigenetically maximize intrauterine environmental adaptation, shape the sensory, skeletal, and nervous systems, and provide the basis for effective transition to the postnatal environment [9][10][11]. The placenta synthesize serotonin in automatic way [12]. It holds many components of the serotonergic system such as the serotonin reuptake receptor (SERotonin Transporter, SERT), enzymes that metabolize the neurotransmitter (Monoamino Oxidase A, MAOA), and the 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptors [13]. The serotonergic system is involved in two key stress response systems: the HPA (Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal axis) and the LC-NA (Locus Coeruleus–Norepinephrine) [14][15]. The process of maternal and fetal programming involves multiple features (e.g., biological, environmental, psychosocial, and genetic) [1] with long-term consequences. Pathways between placenta programming and neurodevelopmental outcomes are depicted in Figure 1.
/media/item_content/202304/644b1887cf2a7ijerph-20-02718-g001.png
Figure 1. Pathways between placenta programming and neurodevelopmental outcomes. Among biological mechanisms that mediate relationships between early life predictors and later neurodevelopmental outcomes, placental processes via epigenetic mechanisms and perinatal inflammation.
In the prenatal programming the placenta plays a key role orchestrating several maternal-fetal interactions rapidly adapting to the environment through epigenetic variations [16] such as histone modifications, DNA methylation, and microRNA (miRNA) actions that essentially modify the structure of genetic material without altering the nucleotide’s sequence [16][17]. Changes in placental DNA methylation have been recently explored with respect to sex differences [1][4].
Brain development varies basing on the environment hearing stimuli [6]. Functional development of the auditory system proceeds gradually during the third trimester of gestation. Between the 25th and 28th week of gestational age (GA) appear the first reactions to sounds, such as behavioral (muscle contractions), neurovegetative (heart rate accelerations) and electrophysiological responses [1][10] until the maturation of cochlear biomechanics, at about 32nd weeks GA, which allows the fine coding of sound. At 33rd week, GA, fetus can attentively process higher order auditory stimuli, such as music [18]. Prenatal auditory experiences, particularly those of the maternal voice and singing are endowed with critical adaptive value [19][20]. The auditory cortex is a highly plastic epigenetic area crucial for prenatal learning, located in the posterior-medial part of Heschl’s gyrus, a region corresponding with the Brodmann’s area 41 [21] and acoustic environments are essential for shaping the functional organization and processing capabilities of the auditory cortex. Indeed, functional maturation of the auditory system cannot be achieved in presence of a congenital sound deprivation [21][22] whereas exposure of rat pups to an enriched auditory environment enhanced discrimination skills and auditory learning [23]. Some newborns might develop early in response to events such as prematurity, which occurs in a period when the brain has the capacity to re-organize. Compared to full-term, preterm neonates evidenced a decreased connectivity between thalamus and prefrontal, insular, and anterior cingulate cortex, but an augmented functional connectivity between thalamus and lateral primary sensory cortex, suggesting the effect of early experiences of premature extra-uterine life [24]. In the womb the fetus listens to internal sounds coming from the mother’s body (particularly heartbeats and breathing) described as rhythmic, periodic, organized, and predictable, whereas the primary auditory environment in the Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs) is aperiodic (white noise), unorganized, and unpredictable (alarms). Only 2% to 5% of the sounds reaching the ears of the preterm newborn are vocal [25]. Considering the comforting effect of the rhythmic vestibular stimulation, scientists have developed rocking systems in neonatal care units [26]. The acoustic environment of the NICU contains High Frequency (HF > 500 Hz) noise from medical equipment and activities [27]. Increased exposure to HF noise in the NICU as most cochlear neurons are still migrating [28] and cortical folding is still in flux, can disrupt usual tonotopic tuning of cochlear hair cells and hinder subcortical and cortical auditory development [29]. A lack of perception of maternal speech sounds in the NICU can alter brain structure. It is estimated that half of all neonates born very prematurely (i.e., before 32 full weeks GA), in the infancy will show neurodevelopmental impairments [30][31][32] or disorders, such as Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD), anxiety, and depression [33][34][35].
Listening to music triggers several emotional and cognitive responses among distinct and interconnected neural substrates [36] not attributable at the simple sound processing [37][38][39][40][41]. Thus, music can be a valuable tool for multisensory stimulation [42][43]. The effects of music interventions have been explored in relation to cardiorespiratory parameters, growth and feeding, or on behavioral status and pain. Sound stimulation may also alter neural connectivity in the early postnatal life to improve cognitive function or repair secondary damage in various neurological and psychiatric disorders [44]. Music would similarly be able to affect the social-emotional development because it induces activity in the limbic and paralimbic structures involved in the emotion regulation [39]. Therefore, emotions evoked by music implies the core of evolutionarily adaptive neuroaffective mechanisms [38]. Music and singing also promote to the production of endorphins for both the mother and the fetus contributing to lower anxieties and regularize blood pressure and heart rate [45]. Full-term newborns in the first few days of life exhibit emotional neural responses to musical stimuli [46][47]. Therefore, the auditory histories, in the form of excessive noise, acoustic deprivation or sound training can affect auditory processes throughout the lifespan [48].

2. Musical Stimulation on Placental Programming of Preterm Infants

Prenatal life affects the development of the fetal nervous system with long-term neurobehavioral consequences. Fetal vulnerabilities caused by the maternal environment depend on several factors. First, the time and period of exposure to environmental risks will have different effects on the fetus depending on her/his developmental stage. Second, female become progressively less sensitive to perturbations in their environments as gestation progresses. Indeed, male fetuses, in contrast with females, experience delays in brain maturation when exposed to prenatal adversity. In addition, depending on the gender of the fetus, there will be differences in placental structure and function, including gene methylation and glucocorticoid receptor expression and function that may result in variations in response to environmental adversity. The schedule of maternal and fetal vulnerabilities also explains how the same signal can have opposite effects depending on the timing of exposure.
The sound environment plays a key role in the growth of the CNS because all stimuli present in the environment in which the fetus grows contribute to the development of the acoustic sensory pathways, also promoting the process of structural and functional maturation of the CNS. Prenatal brain development is largely dependent on the environment. The occurrence of meaningful sounds is essential for a correct maturation of the auditory system. Music can be a valuable aid in promoting positive auditory stimulation. In clinical practice, prenatal exposure to music could be employed to reduce in-hospital drug therapy considering its simplicity, non-invasiveness, cheapness, and lack of harmful effects on both the mother and the fetus [49]. The intravaginal application of the stimulus can facilitate, and shorten ultrasound examinations, since it induces early excitatory responses in the fetus, as early as the 16th week GA [50] but its scientific soundness is questionable.
A review of music therapy in the NICU discovered unimagined perceptual, adaptive, and active engagement abilities of preterm babies during music intervention [51]. The scholars summarized several music or auditory stimulation interventions that incorporated musical elements-such as sounds and rhythm-established on the acoustic intrauterine environment, such as recorded womb sounds, the maternal voice, breathing sounds, and heartbeats. The paper indicated that music has encouraging effects on the preterm newborns, calming, and relaxing them and reducing their stress level. A second systematic review of music-based intervention published from 2010 to 2015 indicated poor quality of music intervention investigations [52]. Finally, a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials showed that prenatal music therapy did not change fetal heart rate, number of fetal movements, or number of accelerations in different intervention phases, probably due to the heterogeneity of music therapy strategies applied during pregnancy [19]. In the NICU, high levels of stress and instability due to deprivation of contact with the mother and the presence of unnatural stimuli, such as loud mechanical noises, unsettle normal brain development [53]. Thereby, premature newborns are at high risk of developing neurological, cognitive, and behavioral harms due to functional impairment of the prefrontal cortex, hippocampus, amygdala (of the limbic system), and the fiber tracts that connect them to these centers [42]. These consequences on the preterm organism might be reduced by controlling the levels of the sound environment and providing structured auditory stimulation [53][54][55][56][57]. Several studies included have considered the effects of listening to music on premature newborns’ physiological data [53][54][55][57][58][59][60]. Early enrichment of NICUs environment by music have utilized distinct types of music and several protocols concerning the amount of music exposure, type of music intervention, delivery method, GA of the participants, leading to results showing a stabilizing effect of music on heart and respiratory rhythms, a decrease in apnea and bradycardia counts per day, an improvement in weight gain, and more mature sleep patterns [45][53][55][56][60]. These findings indicate an influence of NICUs sound enrichment on preterm brain maturation. Preterm babies with music intervention showed brain functional connectivity comparable to those of full-term newborns in the same regions [53][54][57][59]. Lastly, emotional regulation was assessed at 12 and 24 months [58]. Preterm infants in the music condition revealed more comparable fear reactivity at 12 months of age and anger reactivity at 24 months of age to full-term babies than preterm control babies. Therefore, early music intervention in NICU appears to have long-lasting influences on emotion regulation and neurodevelopment among preterm newborns. Nevertheless, the effect the music interventions in the NICU, including the type of music and amount of exposure, bone conduction of acoustic vibrations and music processing ability on future brain development and subsequent cognitive-behavioral outcomes deserves additional investigation.
Neonatal care is progressing towards integrating the approach of precision medicine, which intends identifying early precursors of developmental troubles as well as early windows of opportunities for prematurely born newborns. The main atypical neurodevelopmental trajectories of prematurity, such as cognitive and socio-emotional difficulties, are the target for a precision medicine approach in newborn care. One of the keys of prevention in perinatal medicine is the timing of the intervention: neuronal plasticity is maximal during the third trimester of life so any intervention in this period will be more effective than later ones. These motives recently led researchers to highlight the potential effects of auditory stimulation in the NICU as resilience-inducing actions, which share the important auditory sensory medium as a basis and that the trained medical staff and nurses can implement in their routine.

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/ijerph20032718

References

  1. Glynn, L.M.; Sandman, C.A. Prenatal origins of neurological development: A critical period for fetus and mother. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 2011, 20, 384–389.
  2. Barker, D.J.P. Fetal origins of coronary heart disease. BMJ 1995, 311, 171–174.
  3. Spencer, H.G.; Pleasants, A.B.; Gluckman, P.D.; Wake, G.C. A model of optimal timing for a predictive adaptive response. J. Dev. Orig. Heath Dis. 2022, 13, 101–107.
  4. Gluckman, P.D.; Hanson, M.A.; Low, F.M. The role of developmental plasticity and epigenetics in human health. Birth Defects Res. Part C Embryo Today Rev. 2011, 93, 12–18.
  5. Gluckman, P.D.; Hanson, M.A. Living with the Past: Evolution, Development, and Patterns of Disease. Science 2004, 305, 1733–1736.
  6. Sandman, C.A.; Davis, E.P.; Buss, C.; Glynn, L.M. Prenatal programming of human neurological function. Int. J. Pept. 2011, 2011, 837596.
  7. Glover, V. Annual Research Review: Prenatal stress and the origins of psychopathology: An evolutionary perspective. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 2011, 52, 356–367.
  8. Paquette, A.G.; Lesseur, C.; Armstrong, D.A.; Koestler, D.C.; Appleton, A.A.; Lester, B.M.; Marsit, C.J. Placental HTR2A methylation is associated with infant neurobehavioral outcomes. Epigenetics 2013, 8, 796–801.
  9. Challis, J.R.G.; Sloboda, D.; Matthews, S.G.; Holloway, A.; Alfaidy, N.; Patel, F.A.; Whittle, W.; Fraser, M.; Moss, T.; Newnham, J. The fetal placental hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis, parturition and post natal health. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2001, 185, 135–144.
  10. Feldman, R. From biological rhythms to social rhythms: Physiological precursors of mother-infant synchrony. Dev. Psychol. 2006, 42, 175–188.
  11. Thompson, L.A.; Trevathan, W.R. Cortisol reactivity, maternal sensitivity, and learning in 3-month-old infants. Infant Behav. Dev. 2008, 31, 92–106.
  12. Bonnin, A.; Levitt, P. Fetal, maternal, and placental sources of serotonin and new implications for developmental programming of the brain. Neuroscience 2011, 197, 1–7.
  13. Sonier, B.; Lavigne, C.; Arseneault, M.; Ouellette, R.; Vaillancourt, C. Expression of the 5-HT2A serotoninergic receptor in human placenta and choriocarcinoma cells: Mitogenic implications of serotonin. Placenta 2005, 26, 484–490.
  14. Homberg, J.R.; Contet, C. Deciphering the interaction of the corticotropin-releasing factor and serotonin brain systems in anxiety-related disorders. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29, 13743–13745.
  15. Velasquez, J.C.; Goeden, N.; Bonnin, A. Placental serotonin: Implications for the developmental effects of SSRIs and maternal depression. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2013, 7, 47.
  16. Shallie, P.D.; Naicker, T. The placenta as a window to the brain: A review on the role of placental markers in prenatal programming of neurodevelopment. Int. J. Dev. Neurosci. 2019, 73, 41–49.
  17. Nugent, B.M.; Bale, T.L. The omniscient placenta: Metabolic and epigenetic regulation of fetal programming. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 2015, 39, 28–37.
  18. Kisilevsky, B.S.; Hains, S.M.J.; Jacquet, A.-Y.; Granier-Deferre, C.; Lecanuet, J.P. Maturation of fetal responses to music. Dev. Sci. 2004, 7, 550–559.
  19. He, H.; Huang, J.; Zhao, X.; Li, Z. The effect of prenatal music therapy on fetal and neonatal status: A systematic review and meta-analysis. complement. Ther. Med. 2021, 60, 102756.
  20. Pino, O. Fetal Memory: The Effects of Prenatal Auditory Experience on Human Development. BAOJ Med. Nurs. 2016, 2, 2.
  21. Cajal, C.L.R.Y. Antenatal study of the Heschl’s gyrus: The first step to understanding prenatal learning. Med. Hypotheses 2019, 130, 109290.
  22. Lu, J.; Cui, Y.; Cai, R.; Mao, Y.; Zhang, J.; Sun, X. Early auditory deprivation alters expression of NMDA receptor subunit NR1 mRNA in the rat auditory cortex. J. Neurosci. Res. 2008, 86, 1290–1296.
  23. McMahon, E.; Wintermark, P.; Lahav, A. Auditory brain development in premature infants: The importance of early experience. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2012, 1252, 17–24.
  24. Filippa, M.; Lordier, L.; De Almeida, J.S.; Monaci, M.G.; Adam-Darque, A.; Grandjean, D.; Kuhn, P.; Hüppi, P.S. Early vocal contact and music in the NICU: New insights into preventive interventions. Pediatr. Res. 2020, 87, 249–264.
  25. Caskey, M.; Vohr, B. Assessing language and language environment of high-risk infants and children: A new approach. Acta Paediatr. 2013, 102, 451–461.
  26. Richter, J.; Ostovar, R. “It don’t mean a thing if it ain’t got that swing”—An alternative concept for understanding the evolution of dance and music in human beings. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2016, 10, 485.
  27. Kellam, B.; Bhatia, J. Sound Spectral Analysis in the Intensive Care Nursery: Measuring High-Frequency Sound. J. Pediatr. Nurs. 2008, 23, 317–323.
  28. Bystron, I.; Blakemore, C.; Rakic, P. Development of the human cerebral cortex: Boulder Committee revisited. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2008, 9, 110–122.
  29. Deregnier, R.-A.; Wewerka, S.; Georgieff, M.K.; Mattia, F.; Nelson, C.A. Influences of postconceptional age and postnatal experience on the development of auditory recognition memory in the newborn infant. Dev. Psychobiol. 2002, 41, 216–225.
  30. Anderson, P.; Doyle, L.W. Victorian infant collaborative study group: Neurobehavioral outcomes of school-age children born extremely low birth weight or very preterm in the 1990s. JAMA 2003, 289, 3264–3272.
  31. Bhutta, A.T.; Cleves, M.A.; Casey, P.H.; Cradock, M.M.; Anand, K.J. Cognitive and behavioral outcomes of school-aged children who were born preterm: A meta-analysis. JAMA 2002, 288, 728–737.
  32. Montagna, A.; Nosarti, C. Socio-emotional development following very preterm birth: Pathways to psychopathology. Front. Psychol. 2016, 7, 80.
  33. Johnson, S.; Marlow, N. Preterm birth and childhood psychiatric disorders. Pediatr. Res. 2011, 69, 11–18.
  34. Nosarti, C.; Reichenberg, A.; Murray, R.M.; Cnattingius, S.; Lambe, M.P.; Yin, L.; MacCabe, J.; Rifkin, L.; Hultman, C.M. Preterm birth and psychiatric disorders in young adult life. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 2012, 69, 610–617.
  35. Treyvaud, K.; Ure, A.; Doyle, L.W.; Lee, K.J.; Rogers, C.E.; Kidokoro, H.; Inder, T.E.; Anderson, P.J. Psychiatric outcomes at age seven for very preterm children: Rates and predictors. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 2013, 54, 772–779.
  36. Salimpoor, V.N.; Benovoy, M.; Longo, G.; Cooperstock, J.R.; Zatorre, R.J. The rewarding aspects of music listening are related to degree of emotional arousal. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e7487.
  37. Janata, P.; Birk, J.L.; Van Horn, J.D.; Leman, M.; Tillmann, B.; Bharucha, J.J. The cortical topography of tonal structures underlying western music. Science 2002, 298, 2167–2170.
  38. Koelsch, S. Towards a neural basis of music-evoked emotions. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2010, 14, 131–137.
  39. Koelsch, S. Brain correlates of music-evoked emotions. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2014, 15, 170–180.
  40. Blood, A.J.; Zatorre, R.J. Intensely pleasurable responses to music correlate with activity in brain regions implicated in reward and emotion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 11818–11823.
  41. Brown, S.; Martinez, M.J.; Parsons, L.M. Passive music listening spontaneously engages limbic and paralimbic systems. Neuroreport 2004, 15, 2033–2037.
  42. Anderson, D.E.; Patel, A.D. Infants born preterm, stress, and neurodevelopment in the neonatal intensive care unit: Might music have an impact? Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 2018, 60, 256–266.
  43. Van der Heijden, M.J.; Oliai Araghi, S.; Jeekel, J.; Reiss, I.K.M.; Hunink, M.M.; van Dijk, M. Do hospitalized premature infants benefit from music interventions? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0161848.
  44. Chaudhury, S.; Nag, T.C.; Jain, S.; Wadhwa, S. Role of sound stimulation in reprogramming brain connectivity. J. Biosci. 2013, 38, 605–614.
  45. Chang, S.-C.; Chen, C.-H. Effects of music therapy on women’s physiologic measures, anxiety, and satisfaction during cesarean delivery. Res. Nurs. Health 2005, 28, 453–461.
  46. Perani, D.; Saccuman, M.C.; Scifo, P.; Spada, D.; Andreolli, G.; Rovelli, R.; Baldoli, C.; Koelsch, S. Functional specializations for music processing in the human newborn brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 4758–4763.
  47. Sanes, D.H.; Woolley, S.M. A behavioral framework to guide research on central auditory development and plasticity. Neuron 2011, 72, 912–929.
  48. Skoe, E.; Chandrasekaran, B. The layering of auditory experiences in driving experience-dependent subcortical plasticity. Hear. Res. 2014, 311, 36–48.
  49. González, J.G.; Miranda, M.V.; García, F.M.; Ruiz, T.P.; Gascón, M.M.; Mullor, M.R.; Rodriguez, R.A.; Carreño, T.P. Effects of prenatal music stimulation on fetal cardiac state, newborn anthropometric measurements and vital signs of pregnant women: A randomized controlled trial. Complement. Ther. Clin. Pract. 2017, 27, 61–67.
  50. López-Teijón, M.; García-Faura, Á.; Prats-Galino, A. Fetal facial expression in response to intravaginal music emission. Ultrasound 2015, 23, 216–223.
  51. Haslbeck, F.B. Music therapy for premature infants and their parents: An integrative review. Nord. J. Music Ther. 2012, 21, 203–226.
  52. Robb, S.L.; Hanson-Abromeit, D.; May, L.; Hernandez-Ruiz, E.; Allison, M.; Beloat, A.; Daugherty, S.; Kurtz, R.; Ott, A.; Oyedele, O.O.; et al. Reporting quality of music intervention research in healthcare: A systematic review. Complement. Ther. Med. 2018, 38, 24–41.
  53. Lordier, L.; Meskaldji, D.-E.; Grouiller, F.; Pittet, M.P.; Vollenweider, A.; Vasung, L.; Borradori-Tolsa, C.; Lazeyras, F.; Grandjean, D.; Van De Ville, D.; et al. Music in premature infants enhances high-level cognitive brain networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 12103–12108.
  54. Haslbeck, F.B.; Jakab, A.; Held, U.; Bassler, D.; Bucher, H.-U.; Hagmann, C. Creative music therapy to promote brain function and brain structure in preterm infants: A randomized controlled pilot study. NeuroImage Clin. 2020, 25, 102171.
  55. Lordier, L.; Loukas, S.; Grouiller, F.; Vollenweider, A.; Vasung, L.; Meskaldij, D.-E.; Lejeune, F.; Pittet, M.P.; Borradori-Tolsa, C.; Lazeyras, F.; et al. Music processing in preterm and full-term newborns: A psychophysiological interaction (PPI) approach in neonatal fMRI. Neuroimage 2019, 185, 857–864.
  56. Arnon, S.; Epstein, S.; Ghetti, C.; Bauer-Rusek, S.; Taitelbaum-Swead, R.; Yakobson, D. Music therapy intervention in an open bay neonatal intensive care unit room is associated with less noise and higher signal to noise ratios: A case-control study. Children 2022, 9, 1187.
  57. Webb, A.R.; Heller, H.T.; Benson, C.B.; Lahav, A. Mother’s voice and heartbeat sounds elicit auditory plasticity in the human brain before full gestation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 3152–3157.
  58. Lejeune, F.; Lordier, L.; Pittet, M.P.; Schoenhals, L.; Grandjean, D.; Hüppi, P.; Filippa, M.; Tolsa, C.B. Effects of an early postnatal music intervention on cognitive and emotional development in preterm children at 12 and 24 months: Preliminary Findings. Front. Psychol. 2019, 10, 494.
  59. Smith, G.C.; Gutovich, J.; Smyser, C.; Pineda, R.; Newnham, C.; Tjoeng, T.H.; Vavasseur, C.; Wallendorf, M.; Neil, J.; Inder, T. Neonatal intensive care unit stress is associated with brain development in preterm infants. Ann. Neurol. 2011, 70, 541–549.
  60. Smyser, C.D.; Inder, T.E.; Shimony, J.S.; Hill, J.E.; Degnan, A.J.; Snyder, A.Z.; Neil, J.J. Longitudinal analysis of neural network development in preterm infants. Cereb. Cortex 2010, 20, 2852–2862.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!
Video Production Service
Feedback