Diagnosis and Prognosis of Food Selectivity in Autism: History
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Subjects: Rehabilitation
Contributor: , , , , , ,

Autisms Spectrum Disorders (ASD) are characterized by core symptoms (social communication and restricted and repetitive behaviors) and related comorbidities, including sensory anomalies, feeding issues, and challenging behaviors. Children with ASD experience significantly more feeding problems than their peers. In fact, parents and clinicians have to manage daily the burden of various dysfunctional behaviors of children at mealtimes (food refusal, limited variety of food, single food intake, or liquid diet). These dysfunctional behaviors at mealtime depend on different factors that are either medical/sensorial or behavioral. 

  • food selectivity
  • autism spectrum disorder
  • applied behavior analysis

1. Diagnosis and Prognosis of Food Selectivity in Autism

In the new edition of DSM-5 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK519712/table/ch3.t18/, accessed on 9 February 2023), nutrition and eating disorders during childhood include pica, avoidant/restrictive disorder of food intake, rumination disorder, along with eating disorders. Therefore, a persistent eating disorder results in a reduced consumption of food and influences physical health or psychosocial functioning. For example, avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) is characterized by avoidance or restriction of food intake preventing the necessary requirements for nutrition or daily caloric intake. The scientific literature considers this diagnostic category an alternative expression of food selectivity [11,12]. Consequently, in clinical practice, it is important to distinguish different aspects of food refusal before the implementation of an effective treatment. Firstly, clinicians have to examine if the feeding problem reports an organic nature or a behavioral one. For example, symptoms displayed by children such as vomiting and some challenging behaviors could be associated merely with bio-medical factors such as gastrointestinal reflux and significant deficits in nutritional intake [13]. Conversely, a severe symptom of food refusal could be characterized by dysfunctional behaviors that have the function to obtain social attention or escape [14]. Naturally, both medical and behavioral dimensions could coexist in the same developmental stage.
Specifically, regarding food selectivity in children with ASD, some authors have shown that children with autism reject more food (accepting low-consistency food as puree) than typically developing children (TDC) [15,16]. Furthermore, children with ASD consume less fruit, dairy products, vegetables, proteins, and starch than children without a diagnosis [17]. Likewise, the results of a study carried out with children aged three to five showed that children with ASD, with respect to controls, preferred foods of a certain consistency (68% vs. 5%), are choosier about food (79% vs. 16%), more reticent to try new foods (95% vs. 47%) and assumed a restricted variety of food (58% vs. 16%) [18]. In the last decades, a main study conducted by Bandini, Anderson, Curtin, Cermak, Evans, et al. [19] defining food selectivity as food refusal, restricted variety of food, and single-food intake, compared children with ASD and TDC, evaluating the impact on the related nutritional intake. This study, based on the Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ), showed a significantly greater refusal of food (especially vegetables) of children with ASD compared to TDC. During the last ten years, the studies on food selectivity in children with ASD have increasingly shed light on various dimensions of the problem. A parent report on food selectivity study [20], examined 525 children aged 2–18 years with and without atypical development (ASD, PDD-NOS, and Asperger’s disorder). Individuals with an ASD were reported to have significantly more food selectivity than both the atypically developing group and the TDC. In addition, food refusal showed a decrease across childhood, especially in the Asperger’s disorder group. In fact, a significant study examined the food selectivity in children with ASD longitudinally [21]. A total of 52 parents of children with autism were surveyed 20 months after completing an initial questionnaire. First and second surveys each contained identical parent-response items to categorize food selectivity levels and a scale to measure sensory over-responsivity. A new scale was added at time two to measure restricted and repetitive behaviors. Results comparing time one to time two indicated no change in food selectivity level and a stable, significant relationship between food selectivity and sensory over-responsivity. These results support the chronicity of food selectivity in young children with autism and the consistent relationship between food selectivity and sensory over-responsivity. Hence, some studies investigate if the food selectivity of children persists into adolescence. In one more recent study, food selectivity was evaluated in 18 children with ASD at two time points (mean age = 6.8 and 13.2 years). While food refusal improved overall, the authors did not observe an increase in food repertoire (number of unique foods eaten). These findings support the need for interventions early in childhood to increase the variety and promote healthy eating among children with ASD [22]. Another interesting study aimed at examining the mealtime behaviors and food preferences of adolescents with ASD [23]. An online questionnaire on mealtime behavior and food preferences of ASD students was conducted by caregivers including parents, and the average age of ASD students was 14.1 ± 6.1. The analysis of mealtime behavior resulted in a classification into three clusters: cluster one, the “low-level problematic mealtime behavior group”; cluster two, the “mid-level problematic mealtime behavior group”; and cluster three, the “high-level problematic mealtime behavior group”. Cluster one included students older than those in other clusters and who had their own specific dietary rituals. Meanwhile, cluster three included students younger than those in other clusters and who had high-level problematic mealtime behavior and a low preference for food. In particular, there were significant differences in age and food preference for each subdivided ASD group according to their eating behaviors.
As displayed above, the term “food selectivity” describes a wide range of behaviors or situations related to eating habits, such as restricted calorie intake, food refusal, food-related rituals or obsessions, behavioral problems related to mealtimes, preferences of certain foods, restricted variety of foods, and a diet restricted to specific categories of foods (dairy or protein-rich products). Also, the feeding problems in children with ASD can be associated with Pica disorder [24], atypical use of tools, preferences regarding food preparation [25], and the preference of foods according to texture, color, or temperature [26]. In fact, concerning the classification of children in relation to their mealtime behaviors, based on parent questionnaires, some researchers demonstrated the presence of different groups [27] as children with ASD were categorized as engaging in eating patterns of selective overeating, selective eating only, overeating only, or typical eating. Group differences were found in the areas of diet composition, BMI, and behavioral flexibility. Both the selective overeating group and selective eating only group were prone to favor calorie-dense, nutrient-deficient diets as compared to other groups. Eating groups also presented with differing profiles of everyday behavioral flexibility. These results suggest that selective overeating in ASD may present unique challenges and require tailored interventions.

2. Diet, Weight, and Nutritional Inadequacies

Firstly, the frequency of selective eating and nutritional deficiency was studied among 22 children with autism and an age-matched TDC group. Children with autism ate fewer foods on average than TDC. As compared to controls, children with autism had a higher average intake of magnesium, and a lower average intake of protein, calcium, vitamin B12, and vitamin D [28]. Another research team compared the nutrient intake from food consumed by children with and without ASD and examined nutrient deficiency and excess [29]. Successively, 3-day food records (N = 252) and BMI for children (2–11 years) with ASD were compared with both the National Survey data and a matched subset based on age, gender, family income, and race/ethnicity. Children with ASD and matched controls consumed similar amounts of nutrients from food. Only children with ASD aged 4 to 8 years consumed significantly less energy, vitamins A and C, and the mineral Zn; while those aged 9 to 11 years consumed less phosphorous. A greater percentage of children with ASD met recommendations for vitamins K and E. Few children in either group met the recommended intakes for fiber, choline, calcium, vitamin D, vitamin K, and potassium. Specific age groups consumed excessive amounts of sodium, folate, manganese, zinc, vitamin A (retinol), selenium, and copper. No differences were observed in the nutritional sufficiency of children given restricted diets. Children aged 2 to 5 years with ASD had more overweightness and obesity, while children 5 to 11 years were more likely to be underweight. More recently, an important study [30] involved a cross-sectional electronic medical record review to investigate the demographic characteristics, anthropometric parameters, risk of nutritional inadequacy, dietary variety, and problematic mealtime behaviors in a sample of children with ASD with severe food selectivity. Children (age 2 to 17 years) with ASD (N = 279), severe food selectivity, and complete nutritional data were enrolled. Successively, 70 children with ASD and severe food selectivity met the inclusion criteria and their caregivers reported 67% of the sample (n = 47) omitted vegetables and 27% omitted fruits (n = 19). Seventy-eight percent consumed a diet at risk of five or more inadequacies. Risk for specific inadequacies included vitamin D (97% of the sample), fiber (91%), vitamin E (83%), and calcium (71%). Children with five or more nutritional inadequacies (n = 55) were more likely to make negative statements during meals. Nevertheless, severe food selectivity was not associated with compromised growth or obesity. Likewise, a recent meta-analysis [31] examined the differences in nutritional intake and food consumption between children with ASD and controls, as well as the relative compliance with the dietary recommendations. The meta-analysis showed that children with ASD consumed less protein, calcium, phosphorus, selenium, vitamin D, thiamine, riboflavin, and vitamin B12, and more poly-unsaturated fat acid and vitamin E than the controls. The results also suggest a lower intake of calcium, vitamin D, and dairy and a higher intake of fruit, vegetables, protein, phosphorus, selenium, thiamine, riboflavin, and vitamin B12 than recommended. However, these results must be considered with care due to the low number of studies included in the analysis and the high heterogeneity. Additionally, another recent study evaluated the body composition, nutritional status through food selectivity and degree of inadequate intake, and mealtime behavior in children with ASD compared to neurotypical children [32]. A cross-sectional case-control study was carried out on 144 children (N = 55 with ASD; N = 91 with TDC) between 6 and 18 years of age. Body composition, nutritional intake, food consumption frequency (FFQ), and mealtime behavior were evaluated. As aforementioned, results showed a greater presence of children with a low weight (18.4% ASD vs. 3.20% TDC) and obesity (16.3% ASD vs. 8.6% TDC). The presence of obesity in ASD children compared to the comparison group was even higher when considering the fat component (47.5% ASD vs. 19.4% TDC). Moreover, children with ASD had greater intake inadequacy (50% ASD vs. 22% TDC), high food selectivity by FFQ (60.6% ASD vs. 37.9% TDC), and more eating problems (food rejection, limited variety, disruptive behavior), compared to neurotypical children. Concluding, children with severe food selectivity may be at an increased risk of nutritional inadequacies.

3. Hypotheses of the Multidimensional Phenomenon

Concerning the causes of food selectivity in children with ASD, scientists have examined diverse dimensions of altering feeding behaviors. As mentioned above, the importance of motor conditions and/or gastrointestinal complications should be addressed by clinicians. For example, scientists have found contrasting outcomes in gastrointestinal disorders (GID). A higher occurrence of GID may be linked with a more severe food selectivity in children with ASD [33]. Conversely, these two phenomena could not be associated [34]. Additionally, a recent research team investigated the prevalence of GID, food selectivity, and mealtime difficulties, and their associations with dietary interventions, food supplement use, and behavioral characteristics in a sample involving 247 participants with ASD and 267 controls aged 2–18 years [35]. Data were collected via a questionnaire. GIDs were observed in 88.9% of children and adolescents with ASD, more often in girls than in boys. High rates of food selectivity (69.1%) and mealtime problems (64.3%) were found. Food supplements were used by 66.7% of individuals, mainly vitamins/minerals, probiotics, and omega-3 fatty acids. In the ASD sample, 21.2% of subjects followed a diet, mostly based on gluten and milk restriction, including individuals exhibiting food selectivity. Frequency of GID, food selectivity, and mealtime problems correlated weakly, but significantly with behavioral characteristics in the ASD group, although not with food supplement use. Hence, this study demonstrated that a higher frequency of GID, food selectivity, and mealtime problems are common problems in preschoolers, school children, and adolescents with ASD, and together with dietary modification, they are significantly associated with ASD. Mainly, sensory aversion in ASD leads to food elimination, based on consistencies, preferences, and other sensory issues. Consequently, the restriction of food groups that modulate the gut microbiota, such as fruits and vegetables, as well as the fibers of some cereals, triggers an intestinal dysbiosis with increased abundance in Enterobacteriaceae, Salmonella Escherichia/Shigella, and Clostridium XIVa, which, together with an aberrant immune response and a leaky gut, may trigger GID. It has been observed that food selectivity can be the product of previous GID. Likewise, GID could provide information to generate a hypothesis of the bidirectional relationship between food refusal and GID. On the other hand, immunologic dysfunctions have recently emerged as a factor associated with ASD. Although children with ASD are more likely to have GID, little is known about the association between food allergy and ASD. A cross-sectional study used data from the National Health Interview Survey collected between 1997 and 2016 [37]. Children aged 3 to 17 years were included while food allergy, respiratory allergy, and skin allergy were defined based on an affirmative response in the questionnaire by a parent. This research included 199,520 children (mean 10 years; 51% boys). Among them, 4.31% had food allergies, 12.15% had a respiratory allergy, and 9.91% had a skin allergy. A diagnosis of ASD was reported in 1868 children (0.95%). The weighted prevalence of reported food, respiratory, and skin allergies was higher in children with ASD (11.25%, 18.73%, and 16.81%, respectively) compared with children without ASD (4.25%, 12.08%, and 9.84%, respectively). In analyses adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, family highest education level, family income level, and geographical region, the associations between allergic conditions and ASD remained significant. Finally, a significant and positive association of common allergic conditions—in particular food allergies—with ASD was found. An analogous study examined the parent-reported prevalence of co-occurring food allergies and ASD in a nationally representative sample of US children ages 2–17 in the National Health Interview Survey, study years 2011–2015 [38]. In the analytic sample of 53,365 children ages 2–17, there were 905 children with parent-reported ASD (prevalence of 1.7%) and 2977 children with parent-reported food allergies (prevalence of 5.6%). Parent-reported food allergies were nearly 2.5 times more common in children with ASD (prevalence of 13.1%) than in children without ASD (5.4%). These results indicate that food allergies commonly co-occur with ASD, which may have etiological implications.
Moreover, food selectivity could be due to problems in sensory processing (abnormal multimodal sensory responses). Concerning this main approach, food selectivity can be considered a manifestation of the altered sensory response and behavioral rigidity; yet food selectivity manifests itself through preferences regarding consistency (67%), appearance (58%), taste (45%), smell (36%), temperature (22%), [2]. Likewise, sensory processing anomalies, common in individuals with ASD, could be part of the possible mechanisms underlying food selectivity [15]. Essentially, children with ASD and food selectivity are hypersensitive to the consistency (soft, gelatinous, crunchy, hard); the taste; the smells (also of the people around them); the visual aspects (shape, color, and presentation); the temperature of the food (touching); and also to sensory stimuli that surround the environment in which the meal is consumed [39]. To date, sensorial anomalies are connected to autism diagnosis since such behaviors regard multiple sensorial stimuli and sense organs. The majority of autistic children could show hyper/hypo stimulation to tactile, gustative, olfactive, proprioceptive, and visual stimuli [40]. As a result, such sensorial dysregulation influences undoubtedly the mealtimes of children. As aforementioned, some characteristics of food (taste, smell, texture, temperature, colors) are shown by children in single or multiple combinations as well as in sameness, and some rigid behaviors can be displayed through the following stimuli as food presentation, cutlery, brand, and packaging [2,9,18,34,41,42,43,44]. Another study [45] compared oral sensory processing among children with (n = 53) and without ASD (n = 58), aged 3–11 years, examining the relationships between atypical oral sensory processing, food selectivity, and fruit/vegetable consumption in children with ASD. The results showed that more children with ASD had atypical sensory processing than children without ASD, highlighting how among children with ASD, those with atypical oral sensory sensitivity rejected more foods and ate fewer vegetables than those with typical oral sensory sensitivity. Recently, an experimental study was tempted to underline a connection between visual perception and food neophobia [46]. The present study examined whether children with ASD and TDC differed in their visual perception of food stimuli at both the sensorimotor and affective levels; a potential link between visual perception and food neo-phobia was also investigated. Subsequently, 11 children with ASD and 11 with TDC were tested. Visual pictures of food were used, and food neophobia was assessed by the parents. Results revealed that children with ASD experienced visually longer food stimuli than TDC. Complementary analyses revealed that whereas TDC explored more multiple-item dishes (vs. simple-item dishes), children with ASD explored all the dishes in a similar way. In addition, children with ASD gave more negative appreciation in general. Moreover, the hedonic rating was negatively correlated with food neophobia scores in children with ASD, but not in TD children.
Furthermore, other challenging behaviors have also been associated with food selectivity, such as aggression, choking, internalizing, and externalizing problems (anxiety or aggression), rejection of food, and repetitive and restricted behaviors. A study [47] of 256 children with ASD found a moderate but significant correlation between the Repetitive Behavior Scales-Revised [48] and the Brief Autism Mealtime Behavior Inventory (BAMBI), [49], indicating that children with more repetitive behaviors may also exhibit more problematic meal-related behaviors. Also, typical expressions of behavioral sameness could be: using the same utensils (cutlery or special dishes), paying attention to the presentation of the food (food contamination), accepting only certain brands, and paying attention to packaging. In synthesis, children with ASD and food selectivity insist more often than TDC with food selectivity to use the same dish (8% vs. 2%) or to request food prepared in the same way for each meal (28% vs. 20%) [50], and often have behavioral problems challenging to manage (for example, screaming, crying, irritability, aggression, escape, anxiety, turning the head, chewing without swallowing, spitting, and vomiting). A pioneering study observed that 70% of children with ASD in his sample showed food selectivity [43], currently this percentage varies across studies, although slightly lower than the above-mentioned.

4. Parental Stress in Autistic Children with Food Selectivity

In the research literature, parents of children with food selectivity report higher levels of stress than parents of children without food selectivity [34]. One study [51] evaluated the associations between food selectivity with behavioral problems during meals, marital stress, and influences on family members in a group of 53 children with ASD and 58 with TDC, all aged 3 to 11 years old. The results showed that compared to TDC, children with ASD were more likely to have high food selectivity, as a result of which their parents reported more behavioral problems during meals, with consequences that concerned greater marital stress and a strong conditioning on the eating habits of other family members. Furthermore, in response to these feeding behaviors, the caregivers may try to encourage/comfort their child, including reprimanding and eventually replacing dishes according to the preferences of the child. Consequently, the child learns to avoid undesirable foods by emitting challenging behaviors, as well as the parents involuntarily maintaining such behaviors by presenting only the preferred food at mealtime [52]. Also, the restricted food intake of the children can significantly influence the eating habits of the entire family, since children become irritable and exhibit some maladaptive behaviors such as tantrums, reluctance to sit at the table with family, or throwing and spit-out the food with interruptions to their typical meal routines [40]. Consequently, parents, to avoid challenging behaviors during mealtimes, tend to indulge their children’s food tastes by excluding certain foods from the eating habits of the entire family. For example, some families allow the child to eat separately from the family or provide the child with individualized support, supervision, and verbal redirection during meals [53]. However, when asked, the mothers claimed to be subjected to multiple sources of stress due to the impact of atypical eating behaviors and nutritional concerns on family dynamics [54]. Some mothers, interviewed about the perception of meals with their children with autism, described meal time as difficult and stressful, due to the child’s limited diet, emphasizing that behavioral intervention should be taken into account primarily to improve the eating habits of children with ASD, but also to reduce the perception of stress related to the meal routines of the families with children with autism and food selectivity [55]. The meal routine was experienced by mothers with a strong sense of responsibility, as they were often solely responsible for preparing food and meals and perceived this task as crucial to maintaining the child’s general well-being. Additionally, the need to negotiate a child’s feeding challenge was reported by many mothers as one of the reasons influencing family well-being and sometimes even the relationships with friends. It is therefore essential, for the clinician who is preparing a clinical intervention, to consider the need to also support the family through appropriate sessions of parent training. Finally, eating behaviors are also influenced by sociocultural dimensions [56,57], and educational styles implemented by caregivers can similarly have an impact on feeding behaviors. An explanation could be, a minor exposure of children to a varied range of foods provided, other than families could reinforce the dysfunctional behaviors of children during mealtimes [58]. Hence, environmental factors play a role in the development and maintenance of food refusal. The refusal of food can involve positive reinforcement in the form of attention (verbal reprimand or persuasion) or negative reinforcement, such as an early break from the meal, which also maintains the behavior of refusing food.
All the studies described so far seem to support the hypothesis of the multidimensional nature of food selectivity in children with ASD. Also, this phenomenon seems to be associated with important health issues in these children, as well as high levels of parental stress. For these reasons, food selectivity might reduce the quality of life of autistic children and their families, with possible detrimental effects on their future development. Therefore, food selectivity in children with ASD requires specific assessments and tailored interventions.

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/ijerph20065092

This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!
Video Production Service