You're using an outdated browser. Please upgrade to a modern browser for the best experience.
Leptospirosis Infecting Bats: History
View Latest Version
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Contributor:
Fernando P Monroy
,
Sergio Solari
,
Juan Álvaro Lopez
,
Piedad Agudelo-Flórez
,
Ronald Guillermo Peláez-Sanchez

Leptospirosis is a globally distributed zoonotic disease caused by pathogenic bacteria of the genus Leptospira. This zoonotic disease affects humans, domestic animals, and wild animals. Colombia is considered an endemic country for leptospirosis, and Antioquia is the second department in Colombia, with the highest number of reported leptospirosis cases.

  • Leptospira
  • bats
  • Colombia
  • leptospirosis
  • species
  • type

1. Introduction

Leptospirosis is an emerging zoonotic disease caused by pathogenic bacteria of the genus Leptospira [1]. Previous studies have estimated that 1.03 million cases and 58,900 deaths occur due to leptospirosis worldwide annually [2]. Leptospirosis is considered a neglected disease, found mainly in the tropical regions of developing countries [3] and is now recognized as an emerging infectious disease due to large outbreaks in different regions of the world, which are associated with environmental disasters, and extreme climate change. In many endemic regions, severe forms of the disease, such as Weil’s disease and pulmonary hemorrhage syndrome have emerged as the leading cause of death [4]. Currently, about 65 genomic Leptospira species have been identified (NCBI database: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome [accessed on 30 April 2021]), which are subdivided into four main clades according to the phylogenetic analysis of 1371 conserved genes: pathogens (P1), pathogens (P2), saprophytes (S1), and saprophytes (S2) [4][5]. Through serological classification about 300 Leptospira serovars have been described, which are grouped into approximately 30 serogroups and about 200 of these serovars have been considered pathogenic [6]. Colombia is an endemic country for leptospirosis with at least 500 cases every year [7]. Antioquia is the second department in Colombia with the highest number of confirmed cases of leptospirosis [7], with a seroprevalence close to 12.5% [8]. Leptospira interrogans and L. santarosai have been identified as the causative agents of this disease [9]. Therefore, this department in an important region in Colombia for the study of leptospirosis.

Rodents and dogs are often identified as potential sources of human infection, but other mammals have also been identified in the transmission cycle of leptospirosis [1]. Globally, various studies have explored the biological role of bats as reservoirs of zoonotic pathogens due to their ability to fly long distances and disperse pathogens (viruses [10], bacteria [11], parasites [12] and fungi [13]) through urine, saliva, and feces. Bats are the only true flying mammals, belonging to the order Chiroptera [14]. This order includes over 1400 different species in 21 families [15], which are scattered throughout the world, except Antarctica [16]. These mammals are oriented and hunt by echolocation [17]. Depending on the species they can feed on arthropods, fruits, pollen, fish, blood, and other vertebrates (carnivores) [10]. Some species can hibernate [18], form large colonies [19], migrate long distances [20], and have long lifespans (approximately 35 years) [21].

Bats have been identified worldwide as an important reservoir of different Leptospira species (L. interrogans, L. borgpetersenii, L. kirschneri, L. fainei) and their role in disease transmission, and spillover in the life cycle of this bacterium has yet to be defined [22]. Currently, more than 50 species of infected bats with Leptospira have been reported in different countries, including Peru [23], Brazil [24], Argentina [25], Australia [26], Comoros island and Madagascar [27], Reunion Island [28], Mayotte Island [22], Indonesia [23], Malaysia [24], Tanzania [25], Trinidad [26], Sudan [27], Democratic Republic of Congo [28], Africa [29], and Azerbaijan [30]. In Colombia, two studies have reported the presence of bats naturally infected with Leptospira [31][32]. Due to the above characteristics, bats could act as excellent spillover of Leptospira species to the environment, favoring contamination of water and soil, serving as a direct or indirect source of infection for other animals, which are the main reservoirs and disseminators of the bacteria. The objective of the present investigation was to detect Leptospira species infecting different bat species in the Urabá region (Antioquia-Colombia) and to evaluate the genetic diversity of the circulating Leptospira species. This information will illustrate the role of bats in the transmission cycle of human leptospirosis.

2. Places of Bat’s Capture

The investigation was carried out in the Urabá region (Antioquia-Colombia). The sampling was undertaken in five different municipalities (Chigorodó—43 captured bats), (Carepa—43 captured bats), (Apartadó—39 captured bats), (Turbo—40 captured bats), (Necoclí—41 captured bats). In total, 206 bats were captured. The map of the Urabá region and the exact location of the three sampling sites are shown in Figure 1.
Microorganisms 09 01897 g001 550
Figure 1. The geographical location of capture sites. The map shows the geographical location of the five municipalities that were used to capture the 206 bats (blue-Necoclí, purple-Turbo, orange-Apartadó, dark green-Carepa and light green-Chigorodó). These capture sites are located in the Urabá region (Antioquia-Colombia). The map was generated using the environment and programming language R and packages (ggplot2, MappingGIS, sfMaps, spData, ggrepel, ggspatial, cowplot).

3. Families, Genera and Species of Captured Bats

Researchers captured 206 bats in the five municipalities of the Urabá region (Antioquia, Colombia). These bats were classified into three different families (Phyllostomidae, Molossidae, and Vespertilionidae), 10 different genera (Artibeus, Carollia, Dermanura, Glossophaga, Sturnira, Molossus, Myotis, Uroderma, Rhogeessa, Phyllostomus), and fifteen different species (Artibeus jamaicensis, A. lituratus, A. planirostris, Carollia brevicauda, C. castanea, C. perspicillata, Dermanura rava, Glossophaga soricina, Sturnira bakeri, Molossus molossus, Myotis caucensis, Uroderma convexum, Phyllostomus hastatus, P. discolor), and one unidentified species belonging to the genus Rhogeessa. The genera, families and species are shown in Figure 2. These species have different feeding habits, such as frugivorous (60.19%), insectivores (17.47%), omnivore (1.45%), nectarivores (20.87%) (Table 1).
Microorganisms 09 01897 g002 550
Figure 2. Diversity and abundance of bats captured in the five municipalities of the Urabá region. Figure 2 shows the 3 families, 10 genera, and 15 species of bats that were captured in the five sampling areas. The number of individuals for each taxonomic group classification are also indicated.
Table 1. Diversity of bats captured in the study. This table shows information about the species, number, percentage, frequency and feeding habits of the 206 bats captured.
Species Number Percentage (%) Frequency Feeding Habits
Artibeus jamaicensis 1 0.49% 0.005 frugivore
Carollia brevicauda 13 6.31% 0.063 frugivore
Carollia castanea 1 0.49% 0.005 frugivore
Carollia perspicillata 13 6.31% 0.063 frugivore
Dermanura rava 4 1.94% 0.019 frugivore
Glossophaga soricina 43 20.87% 0.209 nectarivore
Sturnira bakeri 17 8.25% 0.083 frugivore
Molossus molossus 26 12.62% 0.126 insectivore
Artibeus lituratus 5 2.43% 0.024 frugivore
Myotis caucensis 9 4.37% 0.044 insectivore
Artibeus planirostris 55 26.70% 0.267 frugivore
Uroderma convexum 15 7.28% 0.073 frugivore
Rhogeessa sp. 1 0.49% 0.005 insectivore
Phyllostomus hastatus 2 0.97% 0.010 omnivore
Phyllostomus discolor 1 0.49% 0.005 omnivore
TOTAL 206 100% 1  

4. Detection of Leptospira spp. in Bats by Conventional PCR

Researchers analyzed 206 bat kidneys by PCR by amplifying the 16S ribosomal gene for detection of Leptospira spp. Twenty individual bats were positive for Leptospira (20/206), obtaining a 9.7% of infected bats (Figure 3). Positive bats for Leptospira infection were found in the 5 municipalities studied (Chigorodó: 3 bats, Carepa: 2 bats, Apartadó: 3 bats, Turbo: 10 bats, and Necoclí: 2 bats). Additionally, 6 different species of bats were found to be infected: Carollia perspicillata, Dermanura rava, Glossophaga soricina, Molossus molossus, Artibeus planirostris, and Uroderma convexum. According to sex, 11 males (55%) and 9 females (45%) were found infected. Regarding feeding habits, 12 frugivores (60%), 6 nectarivores (30%), and 2 insectivores (10%) bats were found infected (Table 2).
Microorganisms 09 01897 g003 550
Figure 3. Molecular detection of bats naturally infected with Leptospira. The figure shows a 1% agarose gel with the amplification products of 20 bats infected with Leptospira spp. The band (331 base pair) corresponding to a fragment of the 16S ribosomal gene. A 100 base pair molecular weight markers were used. Additionally, a positive control (C+: Leptospira interrogans) and a negative control (C-: PCR reagents without DNA) were used in all reactions.
Table 2. Natural infection of bats with different Leptospira species. This table shows the code of the positive samples, Leptospira species identified by amplification of the 16S ribosomal gene, bat species infected, and the municipality from which the sampling area originated.
Code Phylogenetic Identification
(16S Ribosomal Gene)		 Infected Species Feeding Habits Gender Municipality
ZM-022 Leptospira kirschneri Carollia perspicillata Frugivore Female Carepa
ZM-025 Leptospira kirschneri Dermanura rava Frugivore Male Carepa
ZM-047 Leptospira interrogans Glossophaga soricina Nectarivore Female Apartadó
ZM-056 Leptospira kirschneri Glossophaga soricina Nectarivore Male Apartadó
ZM-060 Leptospira noguchii Glossophaga soricina Nectarivore Female Apartadó
ZN-083 Leptospira noguchii Uroderma convexum Frugivore Male Chigorodó
ZN-087 Leptospira noguchii Uroderma convexum Frugivore Male Chigorodó
ZN-107 Leptospira noguchii Uroderma convexum Frugivore Female Chigorodó
ZN-125 Leptospira noguchii Molossus molossus Insectivore Female Turbo
ZN-126 Leptospira kirschneri Molossus molossus Insectivore Male Turbo
ZN-129 Leptospira kirschneri Artibeus planirostris Frugivore Male Turbo
ZN-136 Leptospira borgpetersenii Glossophaga soricina Nectarivore Female Turbo
ZN-138 Leptospira borgpetersenii Glossophaga soricina Nectarivore Female Turbo
ZN-139 Leptospira interrogans Artibeus planirostris Frugivore Male Turbo
ZN-141 Leptospira alexanderi Uroderma convexum Frugivore Female Turbo
ZN-149 Leptospira alexanderi Glossophaga soricina Nectarivore Male Turbo
ZN-150 Leptospira borgpetersenii Artibeus planirostris Frugivore Male Turbo
ZN-163 Leptospira kirschneri Artibeus planirostris Frugivore Male Turbo
ZN-168 Leptospira noguchii Uroderma convexum Frugivore Male Necoclí
ZN-169 Leptospira interrogans Uroderma convexum Frugivore Female Necoclí

5. Identification of Leptospira Species by Phylogenetic Analysis

Through the amplification, sequencing, and phylogenetic analysis of the 20 positive bat samples, the following Leptospira species were identified: Leptospira borgpetersenii (3/20–15%), Leptospira alexanderi (2/20–10%), Leptospira noguchii (6/20–30%), Leptospira interrogans (3/20–15%), and Leptospira kirschneri (6/20–30%). Results of the phylogenetic identification are shown in Figure 4.
Microorganisms 09 01897 g004 550
Figure 4. Identification of Leptospira species infecting bats by phylogenetic analysis of the 16S ribosomal gene. Phylogenetic reconstruction of the 16S ribosomal gene of the genus Leptospira is shown. Red diamonds represent the bats infected with Leptospira spp. Leptospira borgpetersenii, Leptospira alexanderi, Leptospira noguchii, Leptospira interrogans, and Leptospira kirschneri were the Leptospira species found infecting this bat population.

6. Host-Pathogen Relationship between Bats and Leptospira

The host-pathogen association is as follows: Leptospira borgpetersenii infected 2 bats species (Glossophaga soricina and Artibeus planirostris), Leptospira alexanderi infected 2 bats species (Uroderma convexum and Glossophaga soricina), Leptospira noguchii infected 3 bats species (Glossophaga soricina, Uroderma convexum, and Molossus molossus), Leptospira interrogans infected 3 bats species (Glossophaga soricina, Artibeus planirostris, and Uroderma convexum) and Leptospira kirschneri infected 5 bats species (Carollia perspicillata, Dermanura rava, Glossophaga soricina, Molossus molossus, and Artibeus planirostris). The number of infected bats for each Leptospira species is shown in Table 3. Additionally, no renal infection was detected in 9 bat species (A. jamaicensis, C. brevicauda, C. castanea, S. bakeri, A. lituratus, M. caucensis, P. hastatus, P. discolor, and Rhogeessa sp.).
Table 3. Natural infection of bats with different Leptospira species. The table shows the host-pathogen relationship between 6 Leptospira species and 6 bats species susceptible to infection. The number of bats infected by each Leptospira species is shown in parentheses.
Leptospira Species Infected Bat Species Infected Bats
Leptospira borgpetersenii

Glossophaga soricina (2)

Artibeus planirostris (1)

3
Leptospira alexanderi

Uroderma convexum (1)

Glossophaga soricina (1)

2
Leptospira noguchii

Glossophaga soricina (1)

Uroderma convexum (4)

Molossus molossus (1)

6
Leptospira interrogans

Glossophaga soricina (1)

Artibeus planirostris (1)

Uroderma convexum (1)

3
Leptospira kirschneri

Carollia perspicillata (1)

Dermanura rava (1)

Glossophaga soricina (1)

Molossus molossus (1)

Artibeus planirostris (2)

6
   

Total: 20

7. Conclusion

Bats in the Urabá region (Antioquia-Colombia) are important reservoirs and disseminators of pathogenic Leptospira species. With changing habitats due to man-made interventions, bats are becoming a significant reservoir of many zoonotic pathogens.

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/microorganisms9091897

References

  1. Adler, B.; de la Peña Moctezuma, A. Leptospira and leptospirosis. Vet. Microbiol. 2010, 140, 287–296.
  2. Costa, F.; Hagan, J.; Calcagno, J.; Kane, M.; Torgerson, P.; Martinez-Silveira, M.S.; Stein, C.; Abela-Ridder, B.; Ko, A.I. Global morbidity and mortality of leptospirosis: A systematic review. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2015, 9, e0003898.
  3. Haake, D.A.; Levett, P.N. Leptospirosis in humans. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2015, 387, 65–97.
  4. Vincent, A.T.; Schiettekatte, O.; Goarant, C.; Neel, V.K.; Bernet, E.; Thibeaux, R.; Ismail, N.; Khalid, M.K.N.M.; Amran, F.; Masuzawa, T.; et al. Revisiting the taxonomy and evolution of pathogenicity of the genus Leptospira through the prism of genomics. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2019, 13, e0007270.
  5. Cerqueira, G.M.; Picardeau, M. A century of Leptospira strain typing. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2009, 9, 760–768.
  6. Bello, S.; Rodríguez, M.; Paredes, A.; Mendivelso, F.; Walteros, D.; Rodríguez, F.; Realpe, M.E. Comportamiento de la vigilancia epidemiológica de la leptospirosis humana en Colombia, 2007–2011. Biomédica 2013, 33 (Suppl. 1), 153–160.
  7. Carreño, L.A.; Salas, D.; Beltrán, K.B. Prevalencia de leptospirosis en Colombia: Revisión sistemática de literatura. Prevalence of leptospirosis in Colombia: Systematic literature review. Rev. Salud Pública 2017, 19, 204–209.
  8. Agudelo, F.P.; Restrepo-Jaramillo, B.N.; Arboleda-Naranjo, M. Situación de la leptospirosis en el Urabá antioqueño colombiano: Estudio seroepidemiológico y factores de riesgo en población general urbana. Cad. Saúde Pública 2007, 23, 2094–2102.
  9. Sanchez, R.G.P.; Lopez, J.; Pereira, M.M.; Naranjo, M.A.; Agudelo-Flórez, P. Genetic diversity of Leptospira in northwestern Colombia: First report of Leptospira santarosai as a recognised leptospirosis agent. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz. 2016, 111, 737–744.
  10. Calisher, C.H.; Childs, J.E.; Field, H.E.; Holmes, K.V.; Schountz, T. Bats: Important reservoir hosts of emerging viruses. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2006, 19, 531–545.
  11. Mühldorfer, K. Bats and bacterial pathogens: A review. Zoonoses Public Health 2013, 60, 93–103.
  12. Juliane Schaer, J.; Perkins, S.L.; Decher, J.; Leendertz, F.H.; Fahr, J.; Weber, N.; Kai Matuschewski, K. High diversity of West African bat malaria parasites and a tight link with rodent Plasmodium taxa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 17415–17419.
  13. Mok, W.Y.; Luizão, R.C.; Barreto da Silva, M.S. Isolation of fungi from bats of the Amazon basin. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1982, 44, 570–575.
  14. Griffin, D.R. Migrations and homing in bats. In Biology of Bats, 2nd ed.; Wimsatt, W.A., Ed.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1970; pp. 233–264.
  15. Amador, L.I.; Moyers-Arévalo, R.L.; Almeida, F.C.; Catalano, S.A.; Giannini, N.P. Bat systematics in the light of unconstrained analyses of a comprehensive molecular supermatrix. J. Mammal. Evol. 2018, 25, 37–70.
  16. Teeling, E.C.; Springer, M.S.; Madsen, O.; Bates, P.; O’Brien, S.J.; Murphy, W.J. A molecular phylogeny for bats illuminates biogeography and the fossil record. Science 2005, 307, 580–584.
  17. Holland, R.A.; Waters, D.A.; Rayner, J.M. Echolocation signal structure in the megachiropteran bat Rousettus aegyptiacus Geoffroy 1810. J. Exp. Biol. 2004, 207, 4361–4369.
  18. Lyman, C.P. Thermoregulation and metabolism in bats. In Biology of Bats, 2nd ed.; Wimsatt, W.A., Ed.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1970; pp. 301–330.
  19. Constantine, D.G. Activity Patterns of the Mexican Free-Tailed Bat; University of New Mexico Press: Albuquerque, NM, USA, 1967; pp. 1–79.
  20. Cockrum, E.L. Migration in the Guano Bat, Tadarida Brasiliensis; University of Kansas Museum of Natural History: Lawrence, KS, USA, 1969; pp. 303–336.
  21. Eisenberg, J.F. The density and biomass of tropical mammals. In Conservation Biology; Soule, M., Wilcox, B.A., Eds.; Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, MA, USA, 1980; pp. 35–56.
  22. Desvars, A.; Naze, F.; Vourc’h, G.; Cardinale, E.; Picardeau, M.; Bourhy, P. Similarities in Leptospira serogroup and species distribution in animals and humans in the Indian ocean island of Mayotte. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2021, 87, 134–140.
  23. Van Peenen, P.F.D.; Light, R.H.; Sulianti-Saroso, J. Leptospirosis in wild mammals of Indonesia-Recent surveys. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health 1971, 2, 496–502.
  24. Thayaparan, S.; Robertson, I.A.N.; Amraan, F.; Ut, L.S.U.; Abdullah, M.T. Serological prevalence of leptospiral Infection in wildlife in Sarawak, Malaysia. Borneo J. Res. Sci. Technol. 2013, 2, 71–74.
  25. Mgode, G.F.; Mbugi, H.A.; Mhamphi, G.G.; Ndanga, D.; Nkwama, E.L. Seroprevalence of Leptospira infection in bats roosting in human settlements in Morogoro municipality in Tanzania. Tanzan. J. Health Res. 2014, 16, 1–7.
  26. Everard, C.R.; Fraser-Chanpong, G.M.; Bhagwandin, L.J.; Race, M.W.; James, A.C. Leptospires in wildlife from Trinidad and Grenada. J. Wildl. Dis. 1983, 19, 192–199.
  27. Sebek, Z.; Sixl, W.; Reinthaler, F.; Valova, M.; Scneeweiss, W.; Stünzner, D.; Mascher, F. Results of serological examination for leptospirosis of domestic and wild animals in the Upper Nile province (Sudan). J. Hyg. Epidemiol. Microb. Immunol. 1989, 33, 337–345.
  28. Ogawa, H.; Koizumi, N.; Ohnuma, A.; Mutemwa, A.; Hang, B.M.; Mweene, A.S.; Takada, A.; Sugimoto, C.; Suzuki, Y.; Kida, H.; et al. Molecular epidemiology of pathogenic Leptospira spp. in the straw-colored fruit bat (Eidolon helvum) migrating to Zambia from the Democratic Republic of Congo. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2015, 32, 143–147.
  29. Jobbins, S.E.; Alexander, K.A. Evidence of Leptospira sp. infection among a diversity of African wildlife species: Beyond the usual suspects. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2015, 109, 349–351.
  30. Tagi-Zade, T.A.; Mardanly, A.S.; Akhmedov, I.B.; Alekperov, F.P.; Gasanov, S.N. Examination of bats for leptospirosis in the territory of Azerbaijan SSR. Zhurnal Mikrobiol. Epidemiol. I Immunobiol. 1970, 9, 118–121.
  31. Victoria, R.J.; Iriarte, L.J.; Sampedro, A.C. Presence of Leptospira spp. in urban bats from Sincelejo, Sucre, Colombia. Int. J. Pharm. Tech. Res. 2018, 11, 218–225.
  32. Mateus, J.; Gómez, N.; Herrera-Sepúlveda, M.T.; Hidalgo, M.; Pérez-Torres, J.; Cuervo, C. Bats are a potential reservoir of pathogenic Leptospira species in Colombia. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries. 2019, 13, 278–283.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
Video Production Service
Feedback