Somerville et al. [45] recommend good agricultural practice (GAP) and good hygienic practice (GHP) in beekeeping. These are prevention measures that include all general and preventive procedures in order to prevent the disease from getting into non-infected apiaries. In case of clinical signs or suspicion of AFB, it is the duty and legal obligation of everyone in the chain of biological and food production, from beekeepers to veterinarians in the field, veterinarians in the laboratory, and veterinary inspectors, to take appropriate measures and procedures. Good practices include: apiary hygiene; regular checks of the colonies; comb replacement; current disinfection while working in apiaries; inspection of purchased bee colonies and foraging colonies; using sterilized comb foundations produced according to hazard analysis and critical control points (HACCP) systems; laboratory inspection of supplemental feed; and special attention when accepting feral swarms [7,13,43,44,46].

The first and most important step in the suppression of AFB is early disease detection by beekeepers [15,46,47]. A thorough inspection is necessary in the spring if the disease has not been previously diagnosed. When symptoms of the disease appear, during the inspection of each colony, all beekeeping tools and equipment (beekeeping knife, gloves, blouse, etc.) that are used must be disinfected or during the inspection researchers must use disposable equipment that can be safely destroyed after the inspection (gloves). If the disease has occurred nearby, examination should be conducted more often and with the utmost caution. If the disease is detected in one colony in an apiary, all the colonies in that apiary must be examined, as well as those in apiaries that are located within a 3 km radius [6]. If AFB is suspected, the veterinary inspector must be informed immediately in order that all actions and measures needed to suppress and eradicate the disease are undertaken in a fast and efficient way [6,7,11].

AFB cannot be cured and so in accordance with legal procedures, in case of disease and by order of persons authorized by law, radical measures must often be taken. Namely, operators must close and inspect the infected apiary; close the hive entrance and suffocate the bees in the infected bee colony when all the bees have entered the hive (usually in the evening); burn the frames with a comb, as well as the honey and bees from the infected colony; bury all the mentioned materials and dead bees, and conduct thorough disinfection [8,10,43] or, less often, deploy the shaking bee hives measure [7]. After thorough mechanical cleaning, usable (but still new, preserved) hives are burnt with a blowlamp and disinfected with a 2–6% NaOH solution (caustic soda), KOH, Na₂CO_3, or alkaline hypochlorite solution (5% NaClO in the above solutions), heated to 80 °C. After applying one of the aforementioned solutions, the hives are immersed for 5–15 min (this increases exposure to the equivalent of two hours of spraying), then washed with warm water and dried [43,44]. A variety of different studies [43,44] after mechanical cleaning suggested the need to disinfect tools and other equipment with a Na₂CO₃ solution (1 part Na₂CO₃ and 5 parts water) or a 0.5% hypochlorite solution (NaClO) for twenty minutes. Additionally, they suggest to disinfect the apiary area with a solution of 10–20% Ca(OH)₂. Over the next two months, the remaining bee colonies must be monitored closely while enhancing the disinfection of all the tools used to inspect every hive. If there are no new clinically suspicious AFB colonies during this time or if the suspicious colonies are not confirmed as diseased after laboratory examination, there is considered is considered to be no infection [6]. One method still in use for the eradication of AFB in some countries is the shaking method [7]. Considering that AFB is a disease of bee brood, not adult bees, it means shaking/transferring adult bees from the infected community to new disinfected hives and bee combs free from P. larvae endospores in the rest of the beehives in quarantine. Everything that is infected in hives (wax, honey, pollen, propolis, litter) is destroyed. Special/other equipment is always used in the implementation of these measures [7].

AFB is first suspected based on clinical signs of the disease in the apiary, but the diagnosis of AFB is based on laboratory identification of the pathogen [2]. During preventive examinations (monitoring) for the presence of AFB causative agents in the laboratory, in the case of a positive diagnosis, the colonies and apiaries must be clinically examined and legal measures taken [4,7,8,44,47]. While dealing with material suspected of harboring AFB, all biosecurity measures, risk analyses and assessments must be applied to reach the standard for biorisk management in veterinary laboratories and animal facilities [8].

At first glance, clinical symptoms AFB can be mistaken for sacbrood disease, European foulbrood, and varroosis, mostly in the early spring [8,12,30,46,52]. Sacbrood disease is a viral disease of the bee brood, mostly benign, in which larvae do not pupate. Unlike AFB (in which dead larvae transformed into an amorphous, gelatinous and extensible mass and, at the end of the process, often in the spring, into a scale), in the case of sacbrood disease, dead grey-brown larvae under the cap are easily pulled out of the cell and take the shape of a bag (sac), Figure 3B. If the sacbrood process is older, due to drying, the larva turns into a scale, and the head and the last part of the body bend, and thus, it forms into a boat shape. In the early spring, with varroosis, under the cap of the cells of the bee brood, one can see one of the deaths of the often deformed developmental forms of the bee (pupa, young bee) and the presence of Varroa destructor that is most often united with viruses [12,46].

European foulbrood is both an uncapped and sealed brood disease. As such, so diseased larvae die in both uncapped and sealed broods. The causative agent of the disease is a bacterium of the genus Melissococcus, species Melissococcus plutonius (M. plutonius). Diseased larvae are yellowish, often bloated, limp, mushy or liquid; when pulled out of the cell, their chitin layer tears. Sometimes, larvae stop being white due to drying, they lose their pearly glow and segmentation, they do not transform into pupae, and bees can easily eject them from the hive [8,12,30,46].

In early spring, dead bee colonies can often be found with a sealed, unhatched brood, and plenty of food in the hive. Sometimes a doubt can be raised about the cause of the death of the colony, i.e., AFB and/or varroosis [12,46]. In the case of varroosis, after opening the caps, there is usually a formed pupa or young bee in the cell with one or more varoa mites. When it comes to AFB, there are no completed stages of bee development (pupae, young bee), but it is a late stage of the disease (the mass is dried out), and the cell is apparently empty. However, if we examine it carefully, we can find black and brown scales at the bottom, which is quite common for AFB disease processes older than two months [46]. WOAH has presented a broad outline of various diagnostic methods. However, due to differences in sensitivity, the most appropriate of the described methods should be selected [8]. In addition to classical microbiological and antibody-based techniques, molecular and physicochemical methods are used. A wide range of samples can be delivered to the laboratory (diseased and dead larvae, cell swabs, honey, pollen, royal jelly, wax, dead bees, food, and debris from the hive floor) [8,9,46]. The specific methodology applied depends on the type and nature of the materials delivered to the laboratory and the purpose of the examination (preventive examination, suspected disease, already confirmed presence of the disease) [9,16,25,46].

Within classical microbiological methods, microscopic determination of endospores of P. larvae and microbiological cultivation and isolation on nutrient media, with biochemical identification of the causative agent of AFB, are the most commonly applied methods [8,22,30]. There are several enriched selective media for P. larvae culture: P. larvae agar (PLA), Mueller–Hinton, yeast extract, glucose, KH₂PO₄, sodium pyruvate agar (MYPGP), brain–heart infusion medium supplemented with thiamine agar (BHIT), yeast extract agar (J-agar), and Columbia agar from sheep’s blood agar (CSA) [17]. Within the antibody-based techniques, the immunodiffusion test, fluorescent antibody technique (TFA), and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) are applied [53,54,55,56].

In the identification of the causative agent of AFB, molecular techniques are applied. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR), real-time polymerase chain reaction (real-time PCR), and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) are the most commonly used in laboratories [2,4,16,22,25,30,46,47,49,57,58]. Real-time PCR analysis of the 16S rDNA gene of P. larvae represents an alternative, rapid diagnostic tool. As a part of scientific research work as well as genetic and epidemiological studies, methods of partial genome sequencing are more often applied in laboratory diagnostics. These are Multilocus sequence typing (MLST), multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA), and high-throughput sequencing (HTS) [57]. It is also possible to detect P. larvae using microbiome analysis [59]. A method that can also be used to identify this pathogen is based on a physicochemical technique, namely the matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) [60].

The microscopic method of detecting P. larvae endospores is definitely less sensitive than microbiological isolation, but both methods are less sensitive than PCR methods [2,47,48,61,62]. The presence of P. larvae can be determined by microbiological isolation and PCR methods from bee colonies in which the disease has not occurred [16,25,46,47,49].

The existence of the endolysin cell-binding domain (CBD), which binds P. larvae [63], may lead to new methods for the identification of bacterial strains that cause AFB. Yones et al. [64] investigated the possibility of applying of hyperspectral technology as a new trend for immediate detection of AFB disease in honey bee larvae. Early detection of AFB disease in honey bee colonies is certainly of substantial importance as interchanging of colony components can spread easily AFB to healthy colonies.

Legally prescribed measures must be implemented for the detection, monitoring, suppression, and eradication of AFB. Those are prescribed at national, regional and international levels [6,65]. Among other things, these include reporting diseases to competent authorities, conducting epidemiological studies, and monitoring the prevalence of diseases [6,7,8,11,65].

It is also a duty of all responsible people in the beekeeping production to regularly monitoring the health condition of bee colonies, to conduct inspections, to launch anti-AFB initiatives, to implement necessary legal measures, and to share any suspicions of AFB with the competent veterinary services [6,8,15,44,49,65]. When working in the apiary and with bee colonies, special attention should be paid to bee and colony health. It is necessary to conduct a detailed, comprehensive, and expert inspection of bees and bee colonies for diseases, with special attention paid to the presence of bee brood diseases, including AFB. This should be performed at least twice a year, in autumn, including sampling and culturing the bacteria (prior to wintering) and in spring (before bees begin to forage) [7,16]. The health status of apiaries or bee colonies should be observed before commencing any work. Every observed change in the brood, comb, or apiary, the beekeeper must take it seriously and, in case of occurrence, report it to the competent veterinary service. In that case, fast and reliable laboratory tests/diagnostics will be provided, which is a prerequisite for taking legal measures to prevent the spread, control, and eradication of the disease. Some suspected diseases of bees and bee broods, especially AFB, can only be confirmed by laboratory analysis. Therefore, it is obligatory to regularly perform diagnostic testing of the materials originating from any apiary that suspects AFB [30,64,66,67].

In the case of the AFB outbreak, all provisions that refer to measures and procedures in the early detection, monitoring, prevention, suppression, and eradication of the disease must be comply [4,7,8,44,65,68]. Bee production should be organized into associations, because this is the best way fight against the negligence of individual beekeepers. All participants in the process of bee production (beekeepers, veterinarians, fruit growers, agronomists, ecologists) must be educated through meetings, sharing experiences, and expert lectures. Individual beekeepers, beekeeping organizations, clinical veterinary services, laboratories, and veterinary inspectors must all work together to achieve this goal [68].

Figure 4 shows the destruction of infected bee colonies by burning and burying them to render them in order to implement a part of the measures aimed at eradicating the diseases. The disinfection of apiaries has also been shown to be another measure in the chain of disease eradication.

In some segments of organized bee production (e.g., wax and comb production, packaging and marketing honey to third parties, bee feed production), besides using GAP and GHP measures, HACCP systems must also be in place [68,69,70]. A fundamental principle behind implementing these measures is to enhance the quality of food and feed that will be produced in accordance with physico-chemical quality parameters and be microbiologically safe [70,71].

In addition to the above, one of the measures to control AFB is to determine the presence of P. larvae endospores in honey and wax samples (honey wax comb foundation) and, in particular, to implement monitoring programs for honey and honey bee samples to detect P. larvae endospores [9,19,25,43,49,61]. This latter approach is certainly efficacious when the greater costs of suppressing and eradicating AFB compared to the costs of implementing a national AFB control program are taken into account. Additionally, the eradication of AFB can be extremely difficult since the endospores of P. larvae are particularly resistant to the prescribed chemico-physical disinfection measures. Thus, any remaining endospores are viable and capable of causing disease over very long time intervals.

Introducing veterinary services, beekeepers, and beekeeping organizations to appropriate legal regulations, bee and brood diseases, GAP and GHP [6,8,65], proper beekeeping management, and HACCP systems is the basis for successful beekeeping.

Dickel et al. conducted the first experimental trials of an oral vaccination against AFB disease, which represents a new milestone in the management of bee and other insect diseases [72].

The United State Department of Agriculture (USDA) has granted a two-year conditional license to a vaccine produced by Dalan Animal Health, an American biotech company specializing in immunology and insect health, that could help protect bees against the bacterial disease AFB [73].

The implementation of the mentioned measures requires the education of all participants in the process of beekeeping production.