Neuropsychological Outcomes of Children Treated for Brain Tumors: History
View Latest Version
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Contributor:
Alessia Pancaldi
,
Marisa Pugliese
,
Camilla Migliozzi
,
Johanna Blom
,
Monica Cellini
,
Lorenzo Iughetti

Central nervous system (CNS) neoplasms are the most common solid tumors diagnosed in children. CNS tumors represent the leading cause of cancer death and cancer-related morbidity for children less than 20 years of age. Neurological, cognitive, and neuropsychological deficits are the most disabling long-term effects of brain tumors in children. Childhood is a time of extreme brain sensitivity and the time of life in which most brain development occurs. Thus, the long-term toxicities that children treated for CNS tumors experience can affect multiple developmental domains and day-to-day functioning, ultimately leading to a poor quality of survival (QoS). 

  • children
  • adolescents
  • CNS
  • brain tumor
  • neurologic late effects
  • radiotherapy
  • cognitive/neuropsychological outcomes

1. Introduction

Neoplasms of the central nervous system (CNS) are the most common solid tumors diagnosed in children. Although there has been a moderate increase in survival rates in the last decades, CNS tumors still represent the main cause of cancer-related mortality and morbidity for children less than 20 years of age [1][2]. Five-year relative survival varies substantially by histological subtype. The relative survival at 5 years now approaches 75% for malignant tumors and 97.9% for non-malignant tumors, according to the data reported in the Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States (CBTRUS) for the age range 0–19 years [1][3][4]. Significant survival discrepancy by ethnicity still exists for children with CNS tumors, with the largest disparities for diffuse astrocytoma and embryonal tumors [5]. The increase in survival also represents an increasing challenge for oncologists who have to minimize the late effects of tumor diagnosis and treatment. The term “late effects” is broad and applies to complications that begin and can persist after the tumor diagnosis, including lifelong complications. Survivors of childhood cancer can experience many late effects that may affect virtually all organ systems (Figure 1) [6].
Figure 1. Potential complications of childhood cancer by organ system. Created with BioRender.com.
The most pervasive long-term effects specific to childhood brain tumors are neurological, neuropsychological, and cognitive dysfunctions [1][7][8]. Cognitive and neuropsychological problems are more frequent in this population compared to survivors of all other pediatric malignancies [3]. It can happen not only because of the experience of a potentially lethal condition and its therapeutic pathway but also due to the involvement of specific cerebral areas, which hits the CNS in a phase of maximum development. Childhood is the time of life during which most CNS development happens; thus, it is not unexpected that CNS tumor survivors commonly experience neurocognitive impairment. A spectrum of disorders ranging from deficits in school functioning to severe dysfunctions can lead to a variable grade of disability, with limitations on everyday activities [3][9].
Many patients experience both significant global deficits with decreased intelligence quotients (IQ) and specific neuropsychological deficits such as impaired executive functioning, memory, and processing speed [10]. It is estimated that a large proportion of patients treated for a CNS tumor, ranging from 40% to 100%, will experience a deficit in a neurocognitive domain [11][12]. The simultaneous presence of neurocognitive deficits and neurologic impairments can ultimately lead to a decrease in physical and social functioning and, consequently, to a worsening of patients’ quality of survival [12].

2. Epidemiology of Brain Tumors in Children

Primary CNS tumors represent approximately 25% of pediatric cancers, being the most frequent type of solid tumor in children, and are the main non-traumatic cause of death and disability in the first twenty years of life. The annual average age-specific incidence rate of all malignant and non-malignant CNS neoplasms in childhood and adolescence (0–19 years of age) was about 6.23/100.000 from 2014 to 2018 in the United States [4].
The spectrum of brain tumors in childhood is different in terms of location, histology, and prognosis compared to that in adults, suggesting that the pathogenic events are different [13]. During the first two years of life, supratentorial tumors predominate, whereas infratentorial lesions are more common through the rest of the first decade of life; supratentorial tumors again predominate in late adolescence and adulthood [2]. The most common histology in the younger age, between 0 and 9 years, include gliomas and embryonal tumors; in children of age 10–14 years, gliomas and hypophysis tumors are the most common tumor types. In adolescents between 15 and 19 years of age, pituitary tumors and gliomas again predominate [4][13].
It is important to remember that CNS tumor classification has long been based on histological morphological characteristics supported by ancillary tissue-based tests (e.g., immunohistochemical, ultrastructural). The 2016 classification introduced molecular markers as key aspects of classification for a relatively small set of entities. Given the large increase in knowledge of the molecular basis of these tumors, the current fifth edition refers to numerous molecular changes that are crucial for the accuracy of the classification of CNS neoplasms [14].
A significant and increasing volume of literature now reports the several long-term effects of brain tumors and their treatment, showing how survival does not come without costs [15]. Pediatric patients with CNS tumors are at high risk of developing physical, neurocognitive, and psychosocial late effects due to tumor site and multimodal therapy combining neurosurgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy [15].

3. Neurologic and Sensory Late Effects

Children with brain tumors have malignancies and receive therapy that directly affect the brain, and neurological sequelae are common. Although the majority of brain tumor patients present with acute neurologic deficits that will resolve following treatment, some patients experience persistent deficits [3]. Multiple studies have assessed long-term neurologic and neurosensory deficits [9][16]. Survivors of childhood brain tumors may suffer debilitating neurologic impairment, with pain, seizures, and sensory loss among the most predominant. The Children Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS) includes a large retrospective cohort of children and adolescents treated for cancer between 1970 and 1986; data collected on adult survivors of CNS malignancies in childhood show that late neurologic conditions are common in this population and increase with time well beyond the 5-year time point. In the CCSS cohort, a cross-sectional study evaluating 5-year survivors of CNS neoplasms demonstrated an increased incidence, compared to siblings, of early- and late-onset neurologic and neurosensory deficits [9]. Seizures were identified in 25% of patients, more frequently associated with supratentorial tumors [9]. Among the population of survivors without previous seizures in the first 5 years after diagnosis, 33% would experience new onset seizures beyond the 5-year period. Similarly, a high percentage of patients would report visual deficits, with a lower percentage of about 3% for cataracts to a higher proportion of patients complaining of diplopia (17%) [16]. Phillips et al. suggest that pediatric CNS cancer survivors experience additional neurocognitive risk if they develop a seizure diagnosis, with seizure resolution associated with improved attention and memory [17]. In a large cohort of adults survivors of pediatric CNS tumors treated at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, the survivors with a history of seizures were at risk of severely impaired academics, attention, and memory dysfunction compared with those without a history of seizures, even after adjustment for cranial radiotherapy (CRT) exposure [18].
Hearing loss is of particular importance in that the cochlea is highly sensitive to toxicity from radiation and platinum-based chemotherapy; sensorineural hearing loss is associated with worse cognitive and functional outcomes, and intact hearing is critical for language development [19][20] Twelve percent of patients in the CCSS cohort report hearing impairment with a statistically significant relationship to posterior fossa irradiation greater than 50 Gy [9]. Ototoxicity is most commonly a result of treatment with platinum analogs that cause direct cochlear damage, possibly due to reactive oxygen species-induced cellular destruction [21][22]. Risk of ototoxicity is compounded with cranial radiation therapy treatment, with doses above 32 Gy increasing the risk of ototoxicity in a dose-dependent manner [23][24]. More recent studies [23] prospectively examined hearing impairment and associated risk factors and found that RT is independently associated with neurosensorial hearing loss even when ototoxic chemotherapy is not administered; Bass et al. also reported children younger than 3 years at RT initiation, with CSF shunt and receiving higher doses to be at higher risk [23]. Brain tumors can also alter the normal neuroanatomical structures of the visual system leading to visual impairment and dysfunction. Visual impairment in childhood is associated with lifelong effects on self-perception, childhood development, and quality of life [25]. Peripheral neuropathy is a common side effect of platinum analogs and vinca alkaloids; these neuropathic symptoms usually resolve following treatment, but, in some cases, they persist for years after therapy [26].
The CCSS cohort demonstrates cumulative incidence of seizures, motor impairment, and hearing loss increases from 5 to 30 years post-diagnosis [27]. Pediatric CNS cancer survivors, unfortunately, are also at increased risk for stroke, which drastically worsens after exposure to CRT [1].

4. Cognitive and Neuropsychological Outcomes

Cancer-related cognitive dysfunction affects about one-third of childhood cancer survivors in the US [28]. Neurocognitive late effects in childhood brain tumor survivors are relatively common and play a significant role in modifying Health-related Quality of Life (HR-QOL). Traditionally, the measurement of neurocognitive function has been conducted through the assessment of intellectual quotient (IQ). Declines in IQ are evident in pediatric CNS tumor survivors as early as the first year following diagnosis and treatment, with potential progression over the next 5 to 7 years [29]. Children treated for medulloblastoma are reported to have a progressive decrease in their IQ over time, losing 2–4 points per year over 7 years from the time of diagnosis [30][31]. However, more recently, researchers have focused on neuropsychological functions and have identified the ones at greatest risk, believed to represent core deficits that contribute to broader difficulties [3][29][30]. The most frequently impaired functions include attention, working memory, and processing speed [3][30][32].
Executive functions (EFs) deficits are common and are primarily associated with cerebellum-cerebral pathway dysfunction.
Speech and language deficits are documented among nearly all survivors after post-surgery posterior fossa syndrome [15][32].
For some authors, all these functional impairments are thought to be the mechanism behind the decline in IQ. It is reasonable to hypothesize that the neurocognitive decline seen in CNS tumor survivors may be due not predominantly to loss of learned information but rather to a failure in achieving age-related gains in cognitive function [3].

4.1. Attention, Working Memory, and Processing Speed

Processing speed is commonly defined as the promptness in performing relatively automatic mental tasks. Some authors report this domain as the first to be impaired after treatment and to be specifically correlated with craniospinal irradiation (CSI) dose [30]. Brinkman et al., however, in a large cohort of adult survivors of pediatric CNS tumors, report a consistent group of 37% of survivors without CRT exposure but severely impaired on at least one measure of processing speed [18]. Given the importance of myelin in the conduction speed of neural impulses, it is not surprising that deficit in this domain is frequent in children with cancer involving the CNS [18].
Working memory is a temporary workspace in which information is stored and handled for a brief period of time; working memory tasks have been shown to activate the prefrontal cortex [32]. Several studies have reported specific deficits in working memory in the population of children treated for posterior fossa tumors. In particular, a working memory deficit can emerge very early with a progressive decline over time [30]. Edelstein et al. showed that working memory was the only domain with a continuous decline over time despite a stable IQ score 20–40 years after diagnosis of posterior fossa tumors [33].
Attention is the ability to remain alert or focused. It is not a unitary construct, and the subset of skills that falls under the concept of attention includes sustained, focused, selective, divided, alternating, shifting, and resistance to distraction. Attention is demanded by many different tasks, and conclusions about attention functioning can be drawn using subtests of various test batteries [34]. Attention deficits are commonly found in pediatric patients treated for CNS tumors and are reported to appear later than processing speed decline [30]. However, attentional and mnemonic deficits are reported to be present early at diagnosis by some authors [35].
These neuropsychological functions are essential for competence and knowledge acquisition, and their dysfunction is considered to be the core deficit explaining academic underachievement [32].

4.2. Executive Functions

EFs are different but closely interacting skills required for efficient and appropriate behavior. They are often identified as the ability to control, organize and manage cognitive, emotional, and behavioral responses. These functions rely on the integrity of multiple cooperating brain networks [36]. EFs involve inhibition, mental flexibility, planning and decision-making, abstract reasoning, concept formation, problem-solving, and awareness [37]. There has been some debate about whether it is appropriate to assess executive functioning in children, given that the prefrontal cortex is the last cortical area to reach maturation. In contrast, current research has provided evidence for the development of EF in children and for deficits in these areas following brain injury related to normal development. Therefore, it is important to include measures of EF when evaluating children with cancer involving CNS. Studies on EFs in pediatric CNS tumors have reported these patients to be particularly susceptible to EFs impairments, both in the short and long term. Pediatric cerebellar tumor survivors exhibit similar patterns of impairment in executive functions, in particular in forward-thinking, mental flexibility, and inhibition [38].
Consequences of EFs are documented in both low- and high-grade cerebellar tumor survivors [38].
Deficits in this area can manifest in daily life as problems with organization, time management, and emotional and behavioral control and will also negatively impact social development [37]. Optimal executive functioning is reported to play a crucial role in long-term functional outcomes. In the context of intact global intellectual functioning, communication, and memory skills, impairments in EFs can cause the greatest handicap for social attainment and adaptive functioning [36] (Table 1).
Table 1. Cognitive domains impacted by tumor and its treatment and studies describing characteristics and risk factors of impairment.
Cognitive Domain Author, Year Population Main Findings
Global intellectual
functioning		 De Ruiter et al. [38] Meta-analysis summarizing neurocognitive outcomes of 1082 pediatric brain tumor survivors PBTS scored on average 0.54SD to 0.90SD
lower on the WISC-III scales than the normative sample, with
PIQ scores being even more depressed than VIQ scores
Brinkman et al. [17] 224 adult survivors of CNS pediatric tumors 20–30% of survivors demonstrated impairment on performance-based measures of intellect compared to expected 2% in the general population
Lafay-Cousin et al. [39] 16 Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor survivors Overall impaired neurocognitive outcome while treated with a radiation sparing approach
Clark et al. [40] 43 survivors of focal low-grade brainstem gliomas Measures of intelligence quotient significantly lower than normative, despite focal disease and treatment targeting subcortical areas
Moxon-Emre et al. [41] 113 patients treated for medulloblastoma Patients treated with reduced dose craniospinal irradiation plus tumor bed boost showed stable intellectual trajectories while those treated with higher doses and larger boost experienced decline.
Roncadin et al. [42] 29 astrocytoma and 29 medulloblastoma survivors Greater perioperative and short-term medical adversity contributes to lower IQ in the long term
Margelisch et al. [35] 20 CNS tumor patients compared to 27 control patients (other type of cancer) at diagnosis Mean IQs of patients with brain tumor lie within the normal range at diagnosis
Executive functions Law et al. [43] 25 children treated for medulloblastoma with surgery, CRT and chemotherapy and 20 healthy controls EFs deficits are found children treated for medulloblastoma compared to age-matched peers.
Selective deficits in cognitive efficiency, problem-solving and working memory.
Specific damage to cerebrocerebellar circuitry.
Heitzer et al. [44] 32 patients treated for LGG with surgery only Supratentorial LGG and history of seizures:
greater impact on executive functioning
Koustenis et al. [45] 42 pediatric posterior fossa tumor survivors (mean age 14.63 years Pediatric cerebellar tumor survivors show similar pattern of impairment in executive functions in particular in forward-thinking, mental flexibility and inhibition
Memory Margelisch et al. [35] 25 children treated for medulloblastoma with surgery, CRT, and chemotherapy and 20 healthy controls Memory and attention are the principal domain found to be impaired at diagnosis before treatment
Decker et al. [46] 29 PBTS treated with chemotherapy and CRT Associations between hippocampal subfield volumes and short-term verbal memory
Attention Margelisch et al. [35] 25 children treated for medulloblastoma with surgery, CRT, and chemotherapy and 20 healthy controls Memory and attention are the principal domain found to be impaired at diagnosis before treatment
Processing speed Weusthof et al. [47] 103 CNS pediatric patients treated with photon therapy, proton therapy or surgery alone Processing speed is the most vulnerable domain with decline over time in both photon and surgery cohorts
King et al. [48] 57 neurotypical controls and 57 survivors of childhood brain tumors Processing speed appears to be the central cognitive skill that disrupts the other core cognitive skills of attention span and working memory, and all three make a unique contribution to IQ and academic achievement
PBTS: pediatric brain tumor survivors; PIQ: performance intelligence quotient; VIQ: verbal intelligence quotient.

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/children10030472

References

  1. Kline, C.N.; Mueller, S. Neurocognitive Outcomes in Children with Brain Tumors. Semin. Neurol. 2020, 40, 315–321.
  2. Blaney, S.M.; Adamson, P.C.; Helman, L.J. Pizzo and Poplack’s Pediatric Oncology; Wolters Kluwer Health: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2020.
  3. Roddy, E.; Mueller, S. Late Effects of Treatment of Pediatric Central Nervous System Tumors. J. Child Neurol. 2016, 31, 237–254.
  4. Ostrom, Q.T.; Price, M.; Ryan, K.; Edelson, J.; Neff, C.; Cioffi, G.; Waite, K.A.; Kruchko, C.; Barnholtz-Sloan, J.S. CBTRUS Statistical Report: Pediatric Brain Tumor Foundation Childhood and Adolescent Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2014–2018. Neuro-Oncology 2022, 24, iii1–iii38.
  5. Miller, K.D.; Ostrom, Q.T.; Kruchko, C.; Patil, N.; Tihan, T.; Cioffi, G.; Fuchs, H.E.; Waite, K.A.; Jemal, A.; Siegel, R.L.; et al. Brain and other central nervous system tumor statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 381–406.
  6. Landier, W.; Skinner, R.; Wallace, W.H.; Hjorth, L.; Mulder, R.L.; Wong, F.L.; Yasui, Y.; Bhakta, N.; Constine, L.S.; Bhatia, S.; et al. Surveillance for Late Effects in Childhood Cancer Survivors. J. Clin. Oncol. 2018, 36, 2216–2222.
  7. Hudson, M.M.; Mertens, A.C.; Yasui, Y.; Hobbie, W.; Chen, H.; Gurney, J.G.; Yeazel, M.; Recklitis, C.J.; Marina, N.; Robison, L.R.; et al. Health status of adult long-term survivors of childhood cancer: A report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. JAMA 2003, 290, 1583–1592.
  8. Ullrich, N.J.; Embry, L. Neurocognitive dysfunction in survivors of childhood brain tumors. Semin. Pediatr. Neurol. 2012, 19, 35–42.
  9. Packer, R.J.; Gurney, J.G.; Punyko, J.A.; Donaldson, S.S.; Inskip, P.D.; Stovall, M.; Yasui, Y.; Mertens, A.C.; Sklar, C.A.; Nicholson, H.S.; et al. Long-term neurologic and neurosensory sequelae in adult survivors of a childhood brain tumor: Childhood cancer survivor study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2003, 21, 3255–3261.
  10. Puhr, A.; Ruud, E.; Anderson, V.; Due-Tonnesen, B.J.; Skarbo, A.B.; Finset, A.; Andersson, S. Self-Reported Executive Dysfunction, Fatigue, and Psychological and Emotional Symptoms in Physically Well-Functioning Long-Term Survivors of Pediatric Brain Tumor. Dev. Neuropsychol. 2019, 44, 88–103.
  11. Palmer, S.L.; Armstrong, C.; Onar-Thomas, A.; Wu, S.; Wallace, D.; Bonner, M.J.; Schreiber, J.; Swain, M.; Chapieski, L.; Mabbott, D.; et al. Processing speed, attention, and working memory after treatment for medulloblastoma: An international, prospective, and longitudinal study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013, 31, 3494–3500.
  12. Pietila, S.; Korpela, R.; Lenko, H.L.; Haapasalo, H.; Alalantela, R.; Nieminen, P.; Koivisto, A.M.; Makipernaa, A. Neurological outcome of childhood brain tumor survivors. J. Neurooncol. 2012, 108, 153–161.
  13. Orkin, S.H.; Nathan, D.G.; Ginsburg, D.; Look, A.T.; Fisher, D.E.; Lux, S. Nathan and Oski’s Hematology and Oncology of Infancy and Childhood E-Book; Elsevier Health Sciences: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014.
  14. Louis, D.N.; Perry, A.; Wesseling, P.; Brat, D.J.; Cree, I.A.; Figarella-Branger, D.; Hawkins, C.; Ng, H.K.; Pfister, S.M.; Reifenberger, G.; et al. The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: A summary. Neuro-Oncology 2021, 23, 1231–1251.
  15. Murphy, C.; Upshaw, N.C.; Thomas, A.S.; Fong, G.; Janss, A.; Mazewski, C.; Ingerski, L.M. Impact of executive functioning on health-related quality of life of pediatric brain tumor survivors. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 2021, 68, e29130.
  16. Armstrong, G.T.; Liu, Q.; Yasui, Y.; Huang, S.; Ness, K.K.; Leisenring, W.; Hudson, M.M.; Donaldson, S.S.; King, A.A.; Stovall, M.; et al. Long-term outcomes among adult survivors of childhood central nervous system malignancies in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2009, 101, 946–958.
  17. Phillips, N.S.; Khan, R.B.; Li, C.; Mirzaei Salehabadi, S.; Brinkman, T.M.; Srivastava, D.; Robison, L.L.; Hudson, M.M.; Krull, K.R.; Sadighi, Z.S. Seizures’ impact on cognition and quality of life in childhood cancer survivors. Cancer 2022, 128, 180–191.
  18. Brinkman, T.M.; Krasin, M.J.; Liu, W.; Armstrong, G.T.; Ojha, R.P.; Sadighi, Z.S.; Gupta, P.; Kimberg, C.; Srivastava, D.; Merchant, T.E.; et al. Long-Term Neurocognitive Functioning and Social Attainment in Adult Survivors of Pediatric CNS Tumors: Results From the St Jude Lifetime Cohort Study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2016, 34, 1358–1367.
  19. Rey-Casserly, C.; Diver, T. Late effects of pediatric brain tumors. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 2019, 31, 789–796.
  20. Oyefiade, A.; Paltin, I.; De Luca, C.R.; Hardy, K.K.; Grosshans, D.R.; Chintagumpala, M.; Mabbott, D.J.; Kahalley, L.S. Cognitive Risk in Survivors of Pediatric Brain Tumors. J. Clin. Oncol. 2021, 39, 1718–1726.
  21. Kros, C.J.; Steyger, P.S. Aminoglycoside- and Cisplatin-Induced Ototoxicity: Mechanisms and Otoprotective Strategies. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2019, 9, a033548.
  22. Freyer, D.R.; Brock, P.R.; Chang, K.W.; Dupuis, L.L.; Epelman, S.; Knight, K.; Mills, D.; Phillips, R.; Potter, E.; Risby, D.; et al. Prevention of cisplatin-induced ototoxicity in children and adolescents with cancer: A clinical practice guideline. Lancet Child Adolesc. Health 2020, 4, 141–150.
  23. Bass, J.K.; Hua, C.H.; Huang, J.; Onar-Thomas, A.; Ness, K.K.; Jones, S.; White, S.; Bhagat, S.P.; Chang, K.W.; Merchant, T.E. Hearing Loss in Patients Who Received Cranial Radiation Therapy for Childhood Cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2016, 34, 1248–1255.
  24. Merchant, T.E.; Gould, C.J.; Xiong, X.; Robbins, N.; Zhu, J.; Pritchard, D.L.; Khan, R.; Heideman, R.L.; Krasin, M.J.; Kun, L.E. Early neuro-otologic effects of three-dimensional irradiation in children with primary brain tumors. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2004, 58, 1194–1207.
  25. Liu, Y.; Abongwa, C.; Ashwal, S.; Deming, D.D.; Winter, T.W. Referral for Ophthalmology Evaluation and Visual Sequelae in Children With Primary Brain Tumors. JAMA Netw. Open 2019, 2, e198273.
  26. Sun, L.R.; Cooper, S. Neurological Complications of the Treatment of Pediatric Neoplastic Disorders. Pediatr. Neurol. 2018, 85, 33–42.
  27. Wells, E.M.; Ullrich, N.J.; Seidel, K.; Leisenring, W.; Sklar, C.A.; Armstrong, G.T.; Diller, L.; King, A.; Krull, K.R.; Neglia, J.P.; et al. Longitudinal assessment of late-onset neurologic conditions in survivors of childhood central nervous system tumors: A Childhood Cancer Survivor Study report. Neuro-Oncology 2018, 20, 132–142.
  28. Castellino, S.M.; Ullrich, N.J.; Whelen, M.J.; Lange, B.J. Developing interventions for cancer-related cognitive dysfunction in childhood cancer survivors. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2014, 106, dju186.
  29. Stavinoha, P.L.; Askins, M.A.; Powell, S.K.; Pillay Smiley, N.; Robert, R.S. Neurocognitive and Psychosocial Outcomes in Pediatric Brain Tumor Survivors. Bioengineering 2018, 5, 73.
  30. Doger de Speville, E.; Kieffer, V.; Dufour, C.; Grill, J.; Noulhiane, M.; Hertz-Pannier, L.; Chevignard, M. Neuropsychological consequences of childhood medulloblastoma and possible interventions: A review. Neurochirurgie 2021, 67, 90–98.
  31. Palmer, S.L.; Gajjar, A.; Reddick, W.E.; Glass, J.O.; Kun, L.E.; Wu, S.; Xiong, X.; Mulhern, R.K. Predicting intellectual outcome among children treated with 35-40 Gy craniospinal irradiation for medulloblastoma. Neuropsychology 2003, 17, 548–555.
  32. Chevignard, M.; Camara-Costa, H.; Doz, F.; Dellatolas, G. Core deficits and quality of survival after childhood medulloblastoma: A review. Neurooncol. Pract. 2017, 4, 82–97.
  33. Edelstein, K.; Spiegler, B.J.; Fung, S.; Panzarella, T.; Mabbott, D.J.; Jewitt, N.; D’Agostino, N.M.; Mason, W.P.; Bouffet, E.; Tabori, U.; et al. Early aging in adult survivors of childhood medulloblastoma: Long-term neurocognitive, functional, and physical outcomes. Neuro-Oncology 2011, 13, 536–545.
  34. Meyers, C.A.; Perry, J.R. Cognition and Cancer; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2012.
  35. Margelisch, K.; Studer, M.; Ritter, B.C.; Steinlin, M.; Leibundgut, K.; Heinks, T. Cognitive dysfunction in children with brain tumors at diagnosis. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 2015, 62, 1805–1812.
  36. Puhr, A.; Ruud, E.; Anderson, V.; Due-Tonnessen, B.J.; Skarbo, A.B.; Finset, A.; Andersson, S. Executive Function and Psychosocial Adjustment in Adolescent Survivors of Pediatric Brain Tumor. Dev. Neuropsychol. 2021, 46, 149–168.
  37. Anderson, P.J.; Reidy, N. Assessing executive function in preschoolers. Neuropsychol. Rev. 2012, 22, 345–360.
  38. De Ruiter, M.A.; van Mourik, R.; Schouten-van Meeteren, A.Y.N.; Grootenhuis, M.A.; Oosterlaan, J. Neurocognitive consequences of a paediatric brain tumour and its treatment: A meta-analysis. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 2013, 55, 408–417.
  39. Lafay-Cousin, L.; Fay-McClymont, T.; Johnston, D.; Fryer, C.; Scheinemann, K.; Fleming, A.; Hukin, J.; Janzen, L.; Guger, S.; Strother, D.; et al. Neurocognitive evaluation of long term survivors of atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumors (ATRT): The Canadian registry experience. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 2015, 62, 1265–1269.
  40. Clark, K.N.; Ashford, J.M.; Pai Panandiker, A.S.; Klimo, P.; Merchant, T.E.; Billups, C.A.; Conklin, H.M. Cognitive outcomes among survivors of focal low-grade brainstem tumors diagnosed in childhood. J. Neurooncol. 2016, 129, 311–317.
  41. Moxon-Emre, I.; Bouffet, E.; Taylor, M.D.; Laperriere, N.; Scantlebury, N.; Law, N.; Spiegler, B.J.; Malkin, D.; Janzen, L.; Mabbott, D. Impact of craniospinal dose, boost volume, and neurologic complications on intellectual outcome in patients with medulloblastoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2014, 32, 1760–1768.
  42. Roncadin, C.; Dennis, M.; Greenberg, M.L.; Spiegler, B.J. Adverse medical events associated with childhood cerebellar astrocytomas and medulloblastomas: Natural history and relation to very long-term neurobehavioral outcome. Childs Nerv. Syst. 2008, 24, 995–1002; discussion 1003.
  43. Law, N.; Smith, M.L.; Greenberg, M.; Bouffet, E.; Taylor, M.D.; Laughlin, S.; Malkin, D.; Liu, F.; Moxon-Emre, I.; Scantlebury, N.; et al. Executive function in paediatric medulloblastoma: The role of cerebrocerebellar connections. J. Neuropsychol. 2017, 11, 174–200.
  44. Heitzer, A.M.; Raghubar, K.; Ris, M.D.; Minard, C.G.; Gragert, M.N.; Stancel, H.H.; Orobio, J.; Xue, J.; Whitehead, W.; Okcu, M.F.; et al. Neuropsychological functioning following surgery for pediatric low-grade glioma: A prospective longitudinal study. J. Neurosurg. Pediatr. 2019, 25, 251–259.
  45. Koustenis, E.; Hernaiz Driever, P.; de Sonneville, L.; Rueckriegel, S.M. Executive function deficits in pediatric cerebellar tumor survivors. Eur. J. Paediatr. Neurol. 2016, 20, 25–37.
  46. Decker, A.L.; Szulc, K.U.; Bouffet, E.; Laughlin, S.; Chakravarty, M.M.; Skocic, J.; de Medeiros, C.B.; Mabbott, D.J. Smaller hippocampal subfield volumes predict verbal associative memory in pediatric brain tumor survivors. Hippocampus 2017, 27, 1140–1154.
  47. Weusthof, K.; Luttich, P.; Regnery, S.; Konig, L.; Bernhardt, D.; Witt, O.; Herfarth, K.; Unterberg, A.; Jungk, C.; Farnia, B.; et al. Neurocognitive Outcomes in Pediatric Patients Following Brain Irradiation. Cancers 2021, 13, 3538.
  48. King, T.Z.; Ailion, A.S.; Fox, M.E.; Hufstetler, S.M. Neurodevelopmental model of long-term outcomes of adult survivors of childhood brain tumors. Child Neuropsychol. 2019, 25, 1–21.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!
ScholarVision Creations
Feedback