Liquid-Based 3DP Techniques: History
View Latest Version
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Contributor:
Mohamad Alsaadi
,
Eoin P. Hinchy
,
Conor T. McCarthy
,
Vicente F. Moritz
,
Shuo Zhuo
,
Evert Fuenmayor
,
Declan M. Devine

Significant advances have been made in recent years in the materials development of liquid-based 4D printing. Nevertheless, employing additive materials such as nanoparticles for enhancing printability and shape memory characteristics is still challenging. Herein, researchers provide an overview of recent developments in liquid-based 4D printing and highlight novel 4D-printable polymeric resins and their nanocomposite components. Recent advances in additive manufacturing technologies that utilise liquid resins, such as stereolithography, digital light processing, material jetting and direct ink writing, are considered. The effects of nanoparticle inclusion within liquid-based resins on the shape memory and mechanical characteristics of 3D-printed nanocomposite components are comprehensively discussed. Employing various filler-modified mixture resins, such as nanosilica, nanoclay and nanographene, as well as fibrous materials to support various properties of 3D printing components is considered.

  • additive manufacturing (AM)
  • shape memory (SM)
  • polymer nanocomposites

1. Photopolymerisation Techniques

The strategy of photopolymerisation is based on using liquid-state monomers/oligomers in the presence of a photoinitiator material, which can be polymerised via a photochemical reaction under radical, cationic or mixed-mode mechanisms during exposure to UV or laser irradiation, with a specific wavelength and curing depth [1][2]. In addition, some materials can be included in the mixture resin, such as a diluent/solvent, particle and fibre. The performance of the 3DP using the photopolymerisation technique depends on the components, such as a light source, curing direction, build platform and resin tank. The light source can be xenon lamps, mercury arc lamps, LEDs or lasers. Several 3D printers use this technology in producing shape memory components, such as SLA, DLP, CLIP and LCD, which are discussed [3][4].

1.1. Stereolithography (SLA)

The SLA technique builds a 3D part by focusing a UV laser on the photopolymerisable resin to link the molecule chains [5][6]. The apparatus consists of a vat containing liquid resin and a movable build platform (Figure 1). The conventional apparatus layout has a UV source, an x-y scanning mirror over the resin and a platform that moves downwards as the UV laser beam locally cures the resin, i.e., photopolymerises the resin layer by layer. The inverted layout has a UV-transparent window on the bottom of the vat, and the UV source and the x-y scanning mirror are placed under the vat, the build platform moving upwards as the resin is locally UV cured layer by layer [6][7][8]. The time required to print each layer relies on the UV laser beam speed and the irradiated area. These, in turn, are a consequence of a set of scanning mirrors, which reflect the laser beam along the x-y plane, photocuring the resin pixel by pixel, so that the surface of the photoreactive resin is sequentially exposed to the scanning laser beam [7][8]. When completing printing, the object is pulled out from the remaining resin in the vat. It is cleaned with a cleaning agent, e.g., isopropanol, to remove any unreacted resin and then is subjected to a UV post-curing stage to improve the part’s final properties [5].
Jmmp 07 00035 g004 550
Figure 1. Schematic of a typical stereolithography printing method.
For instance, researchers have already demonstrated the effective use of liquid-based resins consisting of photoreactive liquid and fillers, such as silver nanoparticles, copper powder, halloysite nanoclay, montmorillonite and fibres, employing these materials for SLA 3D printing [9][10]. Furthermore, SLA has facilitated the advancement of 3D-printable stimuli-responsive materials, often utilising epoxy- and acrylate-based liquid resins [11][12][13][14] that contain fillers, such as preformed polymeric particles [12] or magnetic iron oxide nanopowder [15]. Variations of SLA, such as mask image projection-based stereolithography (MIP-SL), projection micro-stereolithography (PµSL) and two-photon polymerisation-based printing (2PP), have also been employed within this context [16][17][18].

1.2. Digital Light Processing (DLP)

The DLP technique is a variation of SLA and differs from the latter as it can irradiate each whole layer at once, through a selectively masked light source, instead of having a laser beam that operates on a pixel-by-pixel basis [8][19][20]. The equipment layout is very similar to an inverted SLA; however, instead of having scanning mirrors and a UV laser beam, there is a UV digital projector and a set of micro-mirrors (Figure 2) that can simultaneously irradiate each pixel, which allows for the whole layer to be exposed at a single step and to cure at the same time as well [8][19][20]. In this case, the time required to print each layer does not depend on the area to be printed, and the overall process speed is higher than that of SLA. The usage of DLP technology for stimuli-responsive materials has already been reported in the literature [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29].
Jmmp 07 00035 g005 550
Figure 2. Schematic of a typical DLP printing method.

1.3. Continuous Liquid Interface Printing (CLIP)

CLIP arises as a development from the DLP system, having the same irradiation technology, but allowing the part to be built uninterruptedly with a continuous liquid surface, i.e., the build platform is constantly moving rather than stepwise, as in conventional vat photopolymerisation techniques (Figure 3). This behaviour leads to avoiding layer separation and recoating so that the printing process is claimed to be even faster, as there is no need to pause it between each printed layer [7][30][31][32]. The main advantage of CLIP is the polymerisation inhibition due to the oxygen content in the dead zone, causing the partially consumed reagents at the bottom region of the solid to behave like a living polymerisation system as the liquid interface is continuous [33][34].
Jmmp 07 00035 g006 550
Figure 3. Schematic of a typical CLIP printing method.
In this method, the UV laser beam irradiates the bottom of the vat, projecting the cross-section of the part to be printed; the cross-section projection is continuous and changes progressively like a film instead of launching each layer at a specific time. The printed component is continually moved up, allowing enough time for the photosensitive monomers to react and for the liquid resin to flow underneath the last cured resin portion [35][36]. This behaviour produces a “dead zone”, i.e., a permanent liquid interface between the solid and the UV-transparent window, where, due to an oxygen-permeable membrane placed beneath the resin, the monomer is prevented from reacting as a consequence of the higher oxygen concentration [33][34]. Regarding liquid-based pastes, Ware and Sun (2019) reported the formulation of ceramic-loaded composite inks consisting of photoreactive resin and hydroxyapatite nanoparticles, which were printed through micro-CLIP [37].

1.4. Liquid Crystal Display (LCD)

Further development from DLP has led to LCD-based stereolithography. In this method, the micro-mirror and lens set is replaced with an LCD screen powered by UV-emitting LEDs. These, like DLP, can irradiate or suppress each pixel; therefore, as the LEDs project the part’s cross-section, the liquid crystal screen launches this projection through the UV-transparent window to the resin in the vat [38]. The LCD-SLA also allows the whole layer to be exposed at a single step and to cure simultaneously, building the part layer by layer (Figure 4). Employing LCD-SLA for shape memory 4D-printed polymeric resins has effectively proved the ability of this technique to print high-quality 4DP components [39][40].
Jmmp 07 00035 g007 550
Figure 4. Schematic of a typical LCD printing method.

2. Material Jetting Techniques

In contrast to vat photopolymerisation 3D printers, material jetting technologies enable one to print different polymer materials in a single process, offering, for instance, the possibility to change colours, formulations or fabricate parts that have specific features localised at different positions [41][42]. In the case of photopolymers, material jetting relies on depositing droplets of liquid photoreactive resin on an x-y plane, which are immediately irradiated by a UV laser to initiate polymerisation at that spot and prevent material waste, by-products and debris [43][44][45][46]. These technologies evolved from single-layer 2D-printing techniques; hence, the three-dimensional part is built as ink deposited layer by layer [44][45][47]. The MJ printer jets at least two materials, i.e., build material and support material [48]. After printing, the jetted materials will be immersed in a solution to dissolve the support material. Some technologies, such as Stratasys’ polyjet or 3D Systems’ multijet printing, use an additional layer-levelling process before curing [49][50][51]. It should be noted that polyjet and multijet printing are trademarks representing MJ technology. The two common sorts of 3DP liquid-based jetting materials are CIJ 3D printing and DoD 3D printing.

2.1. Continuous Ink Jetting (CIJ)

CIJ comprises a printing head that ejects a photocurable ink onto a substrate as an accurate x-y coordinate system leads the droplets to be deposited at specific locations. The printing head has a UV-emitting source and one or more nozzles (Figure 5), each nozzle delivering a continuous jet of ink that readily splits into droplets and is subjected to UV-photoinitiated curing to coalesce once they reach the substrate [44][45][52]. This jet splitting would naturally be random, causing the droplets to have varying sizes; nevertheless, applying a piezoelectric transducer that generates periodic mechanical oscillations can correct and control the stream [53]. As the droplets exit from the nozzle, they are electrostatically charged. The amount of charge is associated with the corresponding pixel on the image to be printed. Thus, an electric field is applied to deflect the droplet and guide it to a specific position where it should land on the x-y plane [53]. However, an issue challenging the effective use of CIJ for 3DP functional materials is the undesirable charge repulsion effects that arise as charged droplets become closer. Phung and Kwon (2022) proposed a novel voltage-driving scheme for selective area coating applications to overcome that issue [52]. In this sense, CIJ has promising potential for 4D-printed smart materials, including photopolymer-based composites reinforced with metallic nanoparticles and carbon nanotubes [43][54]
Jmmp 07 00035 g008 550
Figure 5. Schematic of a typical CIJ printing method.

2.2. Drop on Demand (DoD)

Material jetting has been further developed into DoD technology. It differs from CIJ as the ink flow is fully controlled and released only when needed, i.e., on demand, instead of continuous jetting [46][53][54][55]. The printing head nozzle contains a small reservoir or chamber where ink is stored while printing is not required, and two types of mechanisms can be employed to release an ink droplet, either piezoelectric or thermal (Figure 6). In the former, piezoelectric transducers deform as they receive an electric pulse, squeezing the chamber and launching a droplet [47][54][55]. In the latter, an electric pulse activates a thermal resistor that, within a timeframe in the order of microseconds, warms up the ink, producing an expanding bubble through rapid evaporation; hence, as the pressure in the chamber increases, the droplet is finally ejected from the nozzle [47][53][54]. The piezoelectric inkjet exhibits an essential advantage over the thermal one, as the temperature rise represents considerable risk and could dramatically affect the product properties [54].
Jmmp 07 00035 g009 550
Figure 6. Schematic of a typical DOD printing method.
Moreover, DoD possesses a broader range of photoreactive inks with varying properties since the electric pulse can be optimised to meet each ink formulation requirement. In comparison, CIJ is limited by a narrower range of viscosity and surface tension [46]. DoD is suitable for processing materials that find applications in a number of different fields, including electronics, pharmaceuticals and, of course, rapid prototyping [46][56][57].

3. Material Extrusion Technique (Direct Ink Writing (DIW))

DIW is a 3DP technology similar to other extrusion-based AM techniques such as fused deposition modelling (FDM) (also called fused filament fabrication (FFF)), with a difference that in DIW, the printed material is not molten but rather it is semi-liquid or paste-like [58][59][60][61][62][63][64]. In addition, DIW also differs from other material jetting techniques as it delivers continued material (Figure 7) rather than splitting it into droplets, as in CIJ and DoD [63]. In DIW, the material is released from a nozzle as the result of applied pressure, which can be generated either mechanically (through a rotary screw) [61][62][63] or pneumatically (with a piston) [63][64]. DIW is claimed to be able to deliver efficiently and accurately 3D-printed micro-lattice structures, as well as to possess one of the broadest ranges of rapid prototyping ink designs, making a vast number of possibilities feasible in terms of shapes and styles [62][63].
Jmmp 07 00035 g010 550
Figure 7. Schematic of a typical DIW printing method.
Materials for DIW inks are often formulated to solidify immediately or shortly after they exit the nozzle and, frequently, they are subjected to a photocuring stage so that they harden, which can be performed simultaneously with the printing process or after fabrication [60][63]. Furthermore, it is noteworthy that such inks typically present greater mechanical strength and can consist of highly viscous materials and fillers, such as organic or nonorganic particles, to impart shape retention after deposition [61][63]. According to Yang et al. (2021), DIW inks should present high viscoelasticity before extrusion, exhibiting an excellent shear-thinning effect when moving through the nozzle and recovering the viscoelasticity after deposition to retain the desired shape [61]. DIW faces challenges regarding the formulation of composite or functional inks that simultaneously possess the required shear thinning and modulus, as well as the ability to flow under shear stresses without issues and readily restore the previous viscoelasticity [63]. Notwithstanding such matters of concern, DIW finds applications in several fields and has successfully been used to 3D-print mixtures of ammonium oleate with polymers, such as natural rubber, PVDF and epoxy resins [61]; graphene-based paste for prototyping aerogels [62]; cellulose nanocrystal paste [64]; polycaprolactone-reduced graphene oxide composites [65]; PLGA composites reinforced with calcium phosphate and graphene [66]; and polymer-based hydrogels for biomimetic soft robots [67].

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/jmmp7010035

References

  1. Pierau, L.; Elian, C.; Akimoto, J.; Ito, Y.; Caillol, S.; Versace, D.L. Bio-Sourced Monomers and Cationic Photopolymerization–The Green Combination towards Eco-Friendly and Non-Toxic Materials. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2022, 127, 101517.
  2. Bagheri, A.; Jin, J. Photopolymerization in 3D Printing. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2019, 1, 593–611.
  3. Andreu, A.; Su, P.-C.; Kim, J.-H.; Ng, C.S.; Kim, S.; Kim, I.; Lee, J.; Noh, J.; Subramanian, A.S.; Yoon, Y.-J. 4D Printing Materials for Vat Photopolymerization. Addit. Manuf. 2021, 44, 102024.
  4. Ding, N.; Wu, Y.; Xu, W.; Lyu, J.; Wang, Y.; Zi, L.; Shao, L.; Sun, R.; Wang, N.; Liu, S.; et al. A Novel Approach for Designing Efficient Broadband Photodetectors Expanding from Deep Ultraviolet to near Infrared. Light Sci. Appl. 2022, 11, 91.
  5. Hu, G.; Cao, Z.; Hopkins, M.; Hayes, C.; Daly, M.; Zhou, H.; Devine, D.M. Optimizing the Hardness of SLA Printed Objects by Using the Neural Network and Genetic Algorithm. Procedia Manuf. 2019, 38, 117–124.
  6. Melchels, F.P.W.; Feijen, J.; Grijpma, D.W. A Review on Stereolithography and Its Applications in Biomedical Engineering. Biomaterials 2010, 31, 6121–6130.
  7. Robles Martinez, P.; Basit, A.W.; Gaisford, S. The History, Developments and Opportunities of Stereolithography; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; pp. 55–79.
  8. Ligon, S.C.; Liska, R.; Stampfl, J.; Gurr, M.; Mülhaupt, R. Polymers for 3D Printing and Customized Additive Manufacturing. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 10212–10290.
  9. Hu, G.; Cao, Z.; Hopkins, M.; Lyons, J.G.; Brennan-Fournet, M.; Devine, D.M. Nanofillers Can Be Used to Enhance the Thermal Conductivity of Commercially Available SLA Resins. Procedia Manuf. 2019, 38, 1236–1243.
  10. Moritz, V.F.; Bezerra, G.S.N.; Hopkins, M., Jr.; Fuenmayor, E.; Günbay, S.; Hayes, C.; Lyons, J.G.; Devine, D.M. Heat Dissipation Plays Critical Role for Longevity of Polymer-Based 3D-Printed Inserts for Plastics Injection Moulding. J. Manuf. Mater. Process. 2022, 6, 117.
  11. Choong, Y.Y.C.; Maleksaeedi, S.; Eng, H.; Wei, J.; Su, P.C. 4D Printing of High Performance Shape Memory Polymer Using Stereolithography. Mater. Des. 2017, 126, 219–225.
  12. Yu, R.; Yang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, X.; Wu, X.; Zhao, T.; Zhao, Y.; Huang, W. Three-Dimensional Printing of Shape Memory Composites with Epoxy-Acrylate Hybrid Photopolymer. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 1820–1829.
  13. Zhao, T.; Yu, R.; Li, X.; Cheng, B.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, X.; Zhao, X.; Zhao, Y.; Huang, W. 4D Printing of Shape Memory Polyurethane via Stereolithography. Eur. Polym. J. 2018, 101, 120–126.
  14. Inverardi, N.; Pandini, S.; Bignotti, F.; Scalet, G.; Marconi, S.; Auricchio, F. Sequential Motion of 4D Printed Photopolymers with Broad Glass Transition. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2020, 305, 1900370.
  15. Credi, C.; Fiorese, A.; Tironi, M.; Bernasconi, R.; Magagnin, L.; Levi, M.; Turri, S. 3D Printing of Cantilever-Type Microstructures by Stereolithography of Ferromagnetic Photopolymers. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 26332–26342.
  16. Deng, D.; Jain, A.; Yodvanich, N.; Araujo, A.; Chen, Y. Three-Dimensional Circuit Fabrication Using Four-Dimensional Printing and Direct Ink Writing. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Symposium on Flexible Automation (ISFA), Cleveland, OH, USA, 1–3 August 2016; pp. 286–291.
  17. Ge, Q.; Sakhaei, A.H.; Lee, H.; Dunn, C.K.; Fang, N.X.; Dunn, M.L. Multimaterial 4D Printing with Tailorable Shape Memory Polymers. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 31110.
  18. Del Pozo, M.; Delaney, C.; Pilz da Cunha, M.; Debije, M.G.; Florea, L.; Schenning, A.P.H.J. Temperature-Responsive 4D Liquid Crystal Microactuators Fabricated by Direct Laser Writing by Two-Photon Polymerization. Small Struct. 2022, 3, 2100158.
  19. Zhao, Z.; Tian, X.; Song, X. Engineering Materials with Light: Recent Progress in Digital Light Processing Based 3D Printing. J. Mater. Chem. C 2020, 8, 13896–13917.
  20. Lantean, S.; Barrera, G.; Pirri, C.F.; Tiberto, P.; Sangermano, M.; Roppolo, I.; Rizza, G. 3D Printing of Magnetoresponsive Polymeric Materials with Tunable Mechanical and Magnetic Properties by Digital Light Processing. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2019, 4, 1900505.
  21. Löwa, N.; Fabert, J.-M.; Gutkelch, D.; Paysen, H.; Kosch, O.; Wiekhorst, F. 3D-Printing of Novel Magnetic Composites Based on Magnetic Nanoparticles and Photopolymers. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2019, 469, 456–460.
  22. Nagarajan, B.; Mertiny, P.; Qureshi, A.J. Magnetically Loaded Polymer Composites Using Stereolithography—Material Processing and Characterization. Mater. Today Commun. 2020, 25, 101520.
  23. Stassi, S.; Fantino, E.; Calmo, R.; Chiappone, A.; Gillono, M.; Scaiola, D.; Pirri, C.F.; Ricciardi, C.; Chiadò, A.; Roppolo, I. Polymeric 3D Printed Functional Microcantilevers for Biosensing Applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 19193–19201.
  24. Zarek, M.; Layani, M.; Cooperstein, I.; Sachyani, E.; Cohn, D.; Magdassi, S. 3D Printing of Shape Memory Polymers for Flexible Electronic Devices. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 4449–4454.
  25. Ge, L.; Dong, L.; Wang, D.; Ge, Q.; Gu, G. A Digital Light Processing 3D Printer for Fast and High-Precision Fabrication of Soft Pneumatic Actuators. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2018, 273, 285–292.
  26. Choong, Y.Y.C.; Maleksaeedi, S.; Eng, H.; Yu, S.; Wei, J.; Su, P.C. High Speed 4D Printing of Shape Memory Polymers with Nanosilica. Appl. Mater. Today 2020, 18, 100515.
  27. Mu, Q.; Wang, L.; Dunn, C.K.; Kuang, X.; Duan, F.; Zhang, Z.; Qi, H.J.; Wang, T. Digital Light Processing 3D Printing of Conductive Complex Structures. Addit. Manuf. 2017, 18, 74–83.
  28. Devillard, C.D.; Mandon, C.A.; Lambert, S.A.; Blum, L.J.; Marquette, C.A. Bioinspired Multi-Activities 4D Printing Objects: A New Approach Toward Complex Tissue Engineering. Biotechnol. J. 2018, 13, 1800098.
  29. Spiegel, C.A.; Hackner, M.; Bothe, V.P.; Spatz, J.P.; Blasco, E. 4D Printing of Shape Memory Polymers: From Macro to Micro. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022, 32, 2110580.
  30. Zhakeyev, A.; Zhang, L.; Xuan, J. Photoactive Resin Formulations and Composites for Optical 3D and 4D Printing of Functional Materials and Devices. In 3D and 4D Printing of Polymer Nanocomposite Materials: Processes, Applications, and Challenges; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 387–425. ISBN 9780128168059.
  31. Kuang, X.; Roach, D.J.; Wu, J.; Hamel, C.M.; Ding, Z.; Wang, T.; Dunn, M.L.; Qi, H.J. Advances in 4D Printing: Materials and Applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1805290.
  32. Huang, J.; Qin, Q.; Wang, J. A Review of Stereolithography: Processes and Systems. Processes 2020, 8, 1138.
  33. Yeow, J.; Chapman, R.; Gormley, A.J.; Boyer, C. Up in the Air: Oxygen Tolerance in Controlled/Living Radical Polymerisation. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 4357–4387.
  34. Ligon, S.C.; Husár, B.; Wutzel, H.; Holman, R.; Liska, R. Strategies to Reduce Oxygen Inhibition in Photoinduced Polymerization. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 557–589.
  35. Janusziewicz, R.; Tumbleston, J.R.; Quintanilla, A.L.; Mecham, S.J.; DeSimone, J.M. Layerless Fabrication with Continuous Liquid Interface Production. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 11703–11708.
  36. Tumbleston, J.R.; Shirvanyants, D.; Ermoshkin, N.; Janusziewicz, R.; Johnson, A.R.; Kelly, D.; Chen, K.; Pinschmidt, R.; Rolland, J.P.; Ermoshkin, A.; et al. Continuous Liquid Interface Production of 3D Objects. Science 2015, 347, 1349–1352.
  37. Ware, H.O.T.; Sun, C. Method for Attaining Dimensionally Accurate Conditions for High-Resolution Three-Dimensional Printing Ceramic Composite Structures Using MicroCLIP Process. J. Micro Nano-Manuf. 2019, 7, 031001.
  38. Mohamed, M.; Kumar, H.; Wang, Z.; Martin, N.; Mills, B.; Kim, K. Rapid and Inexpensive Fabrication of Multi-Depth Microfluidic Device Using High-Resolution LCD Stereolithographic 3D Printing. J. Manuf. Mater. Process. 2019, 3, 26.
  39. Shan, W.; Chen, Y.; Hu, M.; Qin, S.; Liu, P. 4D Printing of Shape Memory Polymer via Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) Stereolithographic 3D Printing. Mater. Res. Express 2020, 7, 105305.
  40. Kholkhoev, B.C.; Bardakova, K.N.; Epifanov, E.O.; Matveev, Z.A.; Shalygina, T.A.; Atutov, E.B.; Voronina, S.Y.; Timashev, P.S.; Burdukovskii, V.F. A Photosensitive Composition Based on an Aromatic Polyamide for LCD 4D Printing of Shape Memory Mechanically Robust Materials. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 454, 140423.
  41. Loh, G.H.; Pei, E.; Harrison, D.; Monzón, M.D. An Overview of Functionally Graded Additive Manufacturing. Addit. Manuf. 2018, 23, 34–44.
  42. Salcedo, E.; Baek, D.; Berndt, A.; Ryu, J.E. Simulation and Validation of Three Dimension Functionally Graded Materials by Material Jetting. Addit. Manuf. 2018, 22, 351–359.
  43. Yu, K.; Ritchie, A.; Mao, Y.; Dunn, M.L.; Qi, H.J. Controlled Sequential Shape Changing Components by 3D Printing of Shape Memory Polymer Multimaterials. Procedia IUTAM 2015, 12, 193–203.
  44. Tee, Y.L.; Tran, P.; Leary, M.; Pille, P.; Brandt, M. 3D Printing of Polymer Composites with Material Jetting: Mechanical and Fractographic Analysis. Addit. Manuf. 2020, 36, 101558.
  45. Yap, Y.L.; Wang, C.; Sing, S.L.; Dikshit, V.; Yeong, W.Y.; Wei, J. Material Jetting Additive Manufacturing: An Experimental Study Using Designed Metrological Benchmarks. Precis. Eng. 2017, 50, 275–285.
  46. Kim, S. Electronic Ink Formulation for Drop-on-Demand (DoD) Inkjet Printing Fabrication Process. In Proceedings of the 2019 34th International Technical Conference on Circuits/Systems, Computers and Communications (ITC-CSCC), Jeju, Republic of Korean, 23–26 June 2019; pp. 1–2.
  47. Shah, M.A.; Lee, D.-G.; Lee, B.-Y.; Hur, S. Classifications and Applications of Inkjet Printing Technology: A Review. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 140079–140102.
  48. Mora, S.; Pugno, N.M.; Misseroni, D. 3D Printed Architected Lattice Structures by Material Jetting. Mater. Today 2022, 59, 107–132.
  49. Patpatiya, P.; Chaudhary, K.; Shastri, A.; Sharma, S. A Review on Polyjet 3D Printing of Polymers and Multi-Material Structures. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 2022, 236, 7899–7926.
  50. Chadha, C.; Olaivar, G.; Patterson, A.E.; Jasiuk, I.M. Design for Multi-Material Manufacturing Using Polyjet Printing Process: A Review. In Proceedings of the 27th Design for Manufacturing and the Life Cycle Conference (DFMLC), St. Louis, MO, USA, 14–17 August 2022; Volume 5.
  51. Sireesha, M.; Lee, J.; Kranthi Kiran, A.S.; Babu, V.J.; Kee, B.B.T.; Ramakrishna, S. A Review on Additive Manufacturing and Its Way into the Oil and Gas Industry. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 22460–22468.
  52. Phung, T.H.; Kwon, K.-S. Improved Continuous Inkjet for Selective Area Coating Using High-Viscosity Insulating Inks. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2022, 24, 2101527.
  53. Freire, E.M. Ink Jet Printing Technology (CIJ/DOD). In Digital Printing of Textiles; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006; pp. 29–52.
  54. Kholghi Eshkalak, S.; Chinnappan, A.; Jayathilaka, W.A.D.M.; Khatibzadeh, M.; Kowsari, E.; Ramakrishna, S. A Review on Inkjet Printing of CNT Composites for Smart Applications. Appl. Mater. Today 2017, 9, 372–386.
  55. Elkaseer, A.; Chen, K.J.; Janhsen, J.C.; Refle, O.; Hagenmeyer, V.; Scholz, S.G. Material Jetting for Advanced Applications: A State-of-the-Art Review, Gaps and Future Directions. Addit. Manuf. 2022, 60, 103270.
  56. Ameta, K.L.; Solanki, V.S.; Singh, V.; Devi, A.P.; Chundawat, R.S.; Haque, S. Critical Appraisal and Systematic Review of 3D & 4D Printing in Sustainable and Environment-Friendly Smart Manufacturing Technologies. Sustain. Mater. Technol. 2022, 34, e00481.
  57. Elkaseer, A.; Schneider, S.; Deng, Y.; Scholz, S.G. Effect of Process Parameters on the Performance of Drop-On-Demand 3D Inkjet Printing: Geometrical-Based Modeling and Experimental Validation. Polymers 2022, 14, 2557.
  58. Rafiee, M.; Farahani, R.D.; Therriault, D. Multi-Material 3D and 4D Printing: A Survey. Adv. Sci. 2020, 7, 1–26.
  59. Ching, T.; Li, Y.; Karyappa, R.; Ohno, A.; Toh, Y.-C.; Hashimoto, M. Fabrication of Integrated Microfluidic Devices by Direct Ink Writing (DIW) 3D Printing. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2019, 297, 126609.
  60. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, F.; Yan, Z.; Ma, Q.; Li, X.; Huang, Y.; Rogers, J.A. Printing, Folding and Assembly Methods for Forming 3D Mesostructures in Advanced Materials. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2017, 2, 17019.
  61. Yang, G.; Sun, Y.; Limin, Q.; Li, M.; Ou, K.; Fang, J.; Fu, Q. Direct-Ink-Writing (DIW) 3D Printing Functional Composite Materials Based on Supra-Molecular Interaction. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2021, 215, 109013.
  62. Zhao, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, X.; Wang, R.; Xie, J.; Yang, C.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Q.; Li, L.; Lu, C.; et al. Direct Ink Writing of Adjustable Electrochemical Energy Storage Device with High Gravimetric Energy Densities. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1900809.
  63. Murphy, S.V.; Atala, A. 3D Bioprinting of Tissues and Organs. Nat. Biotechnol. 2014, 32, 773–785.
  64. Li, V.C.-F.; Dunn, C.K.; Zhang, Z.; Deng, Y.; Qi, H.J. Direct Ink Write (DIW) 3D Printed Cellulose Nanocrystal Aerogel Structures. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 8018.
  65. Seyedsalehi, A.; Daneshmandi, L.; Barajaa, M.; Riordan, J.; Laurencin, C.T. Fabrication and Characterization of Mechanically Competent 3D Printed Polycaprolactone-Reduced Graphene Oxide Scaffolds. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 22210.
  66. Daneshmandi, L.; Holt, B.D.; Arnold, A.M.; Laurencin, C.T.; Sydlik, S.A. Ultra-Low Binder Content 3D Printed Calcium Phosphate Graphene Scaffolds as Resorbable, Osteoinductive Matrices That Support Bone Formation in Vivo. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 6960.
  67. Cheng, Y.; Chan, K.H.; Wang, X.-Q.; Ding, T.; Li, T.; Lu, X.; Ho, G.W. Direct-Ink-Write 3D Printing of Hydrogels into Biomimetic Soft Robots. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 13176–13184.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!
ScholarVision Creations
Feedback