Racial Disparities and Respiratory Infectious Diseases in USA: History
View Latest Version
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Contributor:
Elizabeth A. K. Jones
,
Amal K. Mitra
,
Shelia Malone

In the U.S., racial disparities are present among children, with Hispanic and Black children carrying the burden of infectious respiratory disease occurrence. Several factors are contributory to these outcomes among Hispanic and Black children, including higher rates of poverty; higher rates of chronic conditions, such as asthma and obesity; and seeking care outside of the home. However, vaccinations can be used to reduce the risk of infection among Black and Hispanic children. Whether a child is very young or a teen, racial disparities are present in occurrence rates of infectious respiratory diseases, with the burden resting among minorities. Therefore, it is important for parents to be aware of the risk of infectious diseases and to be aware of resources, such as vaccines.

  • infectious diseases
  • communicable diseases
  • contagious diseases

1. Introduction

In the United States, children have been significantly impacted by the surge in SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19), respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), and influenza cases [1]. As result of the surge in common respiratory infectious diseases in children during the fall/winter months, especially during the current season, the consequences of racial gaps in common respiratory infectious disease occurrence may be monumental [2][3]. However, researchers have focused more on the relationship between racial gaps and infectious disease occurrence among adults [4]. There has been very little to no attention given to the relationship between racial gaps and infectious disease occurrence among children [5].
The relationship between racial gaps and infectious disease occurrence in children should be a focal point in child health research due to the impact of racial gaps on disease occurrence in vulnerable minority populations, which lead to hospitalizations, ER visits, missed days of school, burden on the healthcare system, and missed days of work for parents [6][7][8]. In the United States, 40.1 to 32.5 per 100,000 children are infected with common respiratory infections each year [9]. This statistic is likely to increase for all children, especially for vulnerable minority children, with the surge in common respiratory diseases as certain safety protocols are relaxed [10]. Due to the negative impact of racial gaps on disease infection, it is imperative to review the relationship between racial disparities and respiratory infectious disease occurrence among children in the United States in order to understand its impact of and to provide strategies that can be implemented to address respiratory infectious disease outcomes in children.

2. Systematic Review

Racial Disparities

Nineteen studies (95%) identified the presence of racial disparities in the occurrence rate of common infectious respiratory diseases, such as SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19), SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19)-related illnesses, influenza virus, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), human metapneumovirus (HMPV), human parainfluenza viruses (HPIVs), streptococcus, staphylococcus aureus, and rhinovirus [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29], among children in the United States. One study conducted by Perez et al. [11] identified the presence of racial disparities in the occurrence rate of infectious respiratory diseases, such as influenza, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), human metapneumovirus (HMPV), human parainfluenza viruses (HPIVs), and SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19), with Blacks or African Americans and Hispanics/Latinos carrying the majority (59%) of the burden of infection. Marks et al. [12] also identified the presence of racial disparities in infectious respiratory disease occurrence when observing SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) hospitalization rates among children aged 0–4, with Black and Hispanic children accounting for 55.5% of cases. Shi et al. [13] also identified the presence of disparity in the occurrence of respiratory infectious diseases, with Hispanic and Black children accounting for 57.6% of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) hospitalizations in 14 states within the United States from July to December 2021. In a study conducted from July 2021 to January 2022, Anesi et al. [14] identified the presence of racial gaps in respiratory disease occurrence, with Black and Hispanic children constituting 52.3% of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) hospitalizations in 17 states. In another study conducted by Shi et al. [15], racial gaps were observed in respiratory disease occurrence, with Black and Hispanic children accounting for 30.6% of hospitalization for SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) in 14 states from January 2021 to March 2021. A study by Levorson et al. [17] also established the presence of racial gaps in respiratory infectious disease occurrence, with Hispanic children having an especially high prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) (26.8%). Lee et al. [17] also found a relationship between race and infectious respiratory disease occurrence, with 19.9% of Black children being hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) in New York City. This finding is extremely startling because Black children only constitute 22.2% of the New York City population. A study by Kurup et al. [18] also validated a relationship between racial disparities and disease occurrence in children, with Hispanic and Black children constituting 76.6% of positive SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) test results. Stierman et al. [19] also established that Black and Hispanic children constituted 53.4% of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) diagnoses in 31 states. A study by Mody et al. [22] also established that Black children had a higher likelihood of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19). Moreover, Graft et al. [23] established that Black and Hispanic children were more likely to test positive according to admission status (59.6%). Mannheim et al. [24] established that 78% of Black and Hispanic children tested positive for SAR-CoV-2 (COVID-19) and that Black and Hispanic children are more likely to test positive for SAR-CoV-2 (COVID-19) than non-minority racial groups. A study by Zambrano et al. [20] established that Black children have a higher likelihood of experiencing severe SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) outcomes. A study conducted in Mississippi by Hobbs et al. [21] revealed that Black children constituted 66% of sudden SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) hospitalizations from March 2020 to February 2021 at the University of Mississippi Medical Center.
Studies by Brandt et al. [25] and Artiga and Hill [29] found that Black, Hispanic, American Indian or Alaska Native, and Asian or Pacific Islander children have higher rates of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection than White children. Studies by O’Halloran [28] and Artiga and Hill [29] also validated a relationship between infectious disease occurrence and racial gaps, finding that Black (ICU: RR:2.74, 95% CI, 2.43–3.09) (Hospitalization: RR: 2.21. 95% CI, 2.10–2.33), American Indian or Alaska Native (ICU: RR: 3.51, 95% CI, 2.45–5.05) (Hospitalization: RR: 3.00, 95% CI, 2.55–3.53), Hispanic (ICU: RR: 1.96, 95% CI, 1.73–2.23) (Hospitalization: RR: 1.87, 95% CI, 1.77–1.97), and Asian or Pacific Islander children (ICU: RR: 1.26, 95% CI, 1.16–1.38) have higher rates of ICU admission and/or hospitalization due to SAR-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection than White children.
Finally, studies by Gualandi et al. [26] and Hansen et al. [27] further validated a relationship between racial discrimination and respiratory infectious diseases by identifying that Black children have higher rates of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections [26] and cases of rhinovirus than White children [27].
However, a study conducted by Hamdan et al. [30] reported mixed findings in terms of the presence of racial disparities in the rate of occurrence of streptococcus, with no disparity present in the rate of occurrence of early-onset Group B streptococcus and racial disparity associated with the occurrence rate of late-onset Group B streptococcus, with Blacks or African Americans carrying the burden for this infection (Blacks/African Americans vs. Whites: RR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.24–1.93; p < 0.001).

3. Meta-Analysis

A meta-analysis of 10 studies (3090 subjects) was conducted. The data extraction included non-Hispanic Whites, non-Hispanic Blacks, and Hispanic subjects. The results relative to the included subjects were pooled and statistically analyzed to determine the effect of the relationship between race (non-Whites and Whites) and disease burden. There were significant differences in test allocation between the two groups, as noted in the forest plot in Figure 1. Although the test rates were higher in the Whites group, non-Whites had disproportionately high positive outcomes for infectious diseases compared to the non-White group. Possible limitations or moderators of this effect include study population demographics at the time of study, unknown vaccination statuses, and individual study designs.
Diseases 11 00023 g002 550
Figure 1. Forest plot data of 10 reviewed studies.
The high p-value for the χ2 test of heterogeneity (p = 0.20) suggests that the heterogeneity is insignificant, shown in Figure 2. This model assumes that all included studies measure the same thing. Several studies that measured larger population sizes were excluded in order to reduce variation across studies.
Diseases 11 00023 g003 550
Figure 2. Mean, standard deviation, and heterogeneity of reviewed studies [13][14][15][16][17][19][21][23][30][31].

4. Risk of Bias

Figure 3 shows the authors’ judgements about each risk-of-bias item. Data are presented as percentages across all included reports or articles.
Diseases 11 00023 g004 550
Figure 3. Risk of bias as assessed in 10 studies.

5. Risk of Bias Summary

A study categorized as “unclear” risk of bias (yellow traffic light with question mark) has missing information, making it difficult to for researchers to come to a consensus with respect to the assessment of limitations and potential problems. A study that is categorized as low risk of bias suggests consensus among the reviewers that the study results are valid. A study is categorized as high risk of bias when the attributes of the study design result in misleading or unclear results.
Figure 4 presents a summary report of risk of bias based on the authors’ judgements about each risk-of-bias item for each included study. Similar to Figure 3, high risk is indicated in red, yellow indicates unclear, and green indicates low risk of bias. A few items in five studies were marked as high risk of bias, whereas the majority of items or criteria were found to have low risk of bias. The investigators of current reviews used some of the limitations mentioned by the authors as potential risks of bias. They are noted in Table 1 as comments about the article for the readers’ judgement. A high risk of bias is indicated in studies listed in Table 1.
Diseases 11 00023 g005 550
Figure 4. Risk-of-bias summary for 10 reviewed studies [13][14][15][16][17][19][21][23][30][31].
Table 1. Comments on risk of bias.
Authors/Studies Comments
Anesi et al. 2022 [14] Self-reported data for a few participants were included in this analysis, a few infants may have been misclassified due to maternal vaccination status, or the mothers’ recollection of complete COVID-19 vaccination may be imperfect, as reported by the author as limitations. The small sample sizes mentioned by the authors resulted in wide confidence intervals.
Levorson et al. 2021 [16] The regional population representativeness may have been affected by selection bias because the methodology focused on self-referral, and subjects in the study had blood labs completed for other clinical purposes. The authors made adjustments for these factors.
Shi et al. 2022 [13] As mentioned by the authors, COVID-19 hospitalizations may have been overlooked because of testing practices and availability. Detailed clinical data are limited for the period during which the omicron variant was predominant (19–31 December 2021). The data do not include the peak of hospitalizations during this period; the delta variant was prevalent in late December.
Perez et al. 2022 [11] New Vaccine Surveillance Network data are limited to enrolled consenting participants, who may not be representative of all children receiving health care, as mentioned by the authors as limitations.
Stierman et al. 2021 [19] The proportion of positive SARS-CoV-2 test results recorded in drive-through clinics increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, as reported in the paper.
This study focused on counties with complete ethnicity and race data. The results may not be generalizable to larger populations, as suggested by the authors.

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/diseases11010023

References

  1. Shapiro, N. Tripledemic Update: RSV, Covid and Flu. Forbes 13 December 2022. Available online: https://www.forbes.com/sites/ninashapiro/article/whats-a-tripledemic-rsv-covid-and-flu/?sh=226354f77579 (accessed on 23 December 2022).
  2. Miguel, C.P.V.; Dasgupta-Tsinikas, S.; Lamb, G.S.; Olarte, L.; Santos, R.P. Race, Ethnicity, and Health Disparities in US Children With COVID-19: A Review of the Evidence and Recommendations for the Future. J. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. Soc. 2022, 11, S132–S140.
  3. PIDS. What’s in the News. What’s in the News—Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society. Available online: https://pids.org/2021/05/07/whats-in-the-news-socioeconomic-racial-and-ethnic-disparities-in-mis-c/ (accessed on 23 December 2022).
  4. Thinking About Racial Disparities in COVID-19 Impacts. Center on the Developing Child at Harvard University. 27 April 2020. Available online: https://developingchild.harvard.edu/thinking-about-racial-disparities-in-covid-19-impacts-through-a-science-informed-early-childhood-lens/ (accessed on 23 December 2022).
  5. Smitherman, L.C.; Golden, W.C.; Walton, J.R. Health Disparities and Their Effects on Children and Their Caregivers During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic. Pediatr. Clin. N. Am. 2021, 68, 1133–1145.
  6. Li, Y.; Wang, X.; Blau, D.M.; Caballero, M.T.; Feikin, D.R.; Gill, C.J.; A Madhi, S.; Omer, S.B.; Simões, E.A.F.; Campbell, H.; et al. Global, regional, and national disease burden estimates of acute lower respiratory infections due to respiratory syncytial virus in children younger than 5 years in 2019: A systematic analysis. Lancet 2022, 399, 2047–2064.
  7. Okomo, U.; Idoko, O.T.; Kampmann, B. The burden of viral respiratory infections in young children in low-resource settings. Lancet Glob. Health 2020, 8, e454–e455.
  8. Schot, M.J.C.; Dekker, A.R.J.; Van Werkhoven, C.H.; Van Der Velden, A.W.; Cals, J.W.L.; Broekhuizen, B.D.L.; Hopstaken, R.M.; De Wit, N.J.; Verheij, T.J.M. Burden of disease in children with respiratory tract infections in primary care: Diary-based cohort study. Fam. Pract. 2019, 36, 723–729.
  9. Goto, T.; Tsugawa, Y.; Mansbach, J.M.; Camargo, C.A.; Hasegawa, K. Trends in Infectious Disease Hospitalizations in US Children, 2000 to 2012. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2016, 35, e158–e163.
  10. Severe Respiratory Illness Increasing in Children: What You Need to Know. RWJBarnabas Health. Available online: https://www.rwjbh.org/blog/2022/november/severe-respiratory-illness-increasing-in-childre/ (accessed on 23 December 2022).
  11. Perez, A.; Lively, J.Y.; Curns, A.; Weinberg, G.A.; Halasa, N.B.; Staat, M.A.; Szilagyi, P.G.; Stewart, L.S.; McNeal, M.M.; Clopper, B.; et al. Respiratory Virus Surveillance Among Children with Acute Respiratory Illnesses—New Vaccine Surveillance Network, United States, 2016–2021. MMWR. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2022, 71, 1253–1259.
  12. Marks, K.J.; Whitaker, M.; Agathis, N.T.; Anglin, O.; Milucky, J.; Patel, K.; Pham, H.; Kirley, P.D.; Kawasaki, B.; Meek, J.; et al. Hospitalization of Infants and Children Aged 0–4 Years with Laboratory-Confirmed COVID-19—COVID-NET, 14 States, March 2020–February 2022. MMWR. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2022, 71, 429–436.
  13. Shi, D.S.; Whitaker, M.; Marks, K.J.; Anglin, O.; Milucky, J.; Patel, K.; Pham, H.; Chai, S.J.; Kawasaki, B.; Meek, J.; et al. Hospitalizations of Children Aged 5–11 Years with Laboratory-Confirmed COVID-19—COVID-NET, 14 States, March 2020–February 2022. MMWR. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2022, 71, 574–581.
  14. Anesi, J. Commentary: Effectiveness of two-dose vaccination with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines against COVID-19-associated hospitalizations among immunocompromised adults—Nine states, January–September 2021. Am. J. Transplant. 2021, 22, 304–305.
  15. Shi, D.S.; Hause, A.M.; Gee, J.; Baggs, J.; Abara, W.E.; Marquez, P.; Thompson, D.; Su, J.R.; Licata, C.; Rosenblum, H.G.; et al. COVID-19 Vaccine Safety in adolescents aged 12–17 years—United States, December 14, 2020–July 16, 2021. MMWR. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2021, 70, 1053–1058.
  16. Levorson, R.E.; Christian, E.; Hunter, B.; Sayal, J.; Sun, J.; Bruce, S.A.; Garofalo, S.; Southerland, M.; Ho, S.; Levy, S.; et al. A cross-sectional investigation of SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence and associated risk factors in children and adolescents in the United States. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0259823.
  17. Lee, E.H.; Kepler, K.L.; Geevarughese, A.; Paneth-Pollak, R.; Dorsinville, M.S.; Ngai, S.; Reilly, K.H. Race/Ethnicity Among Children With COVID-19–Associated Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome. JAMA Netw. Open 2020, 3, e2030280.
  18. Kurup, S.; Burgess, R.; Tine, F.; Chahroudi, A.; Lee, D.L. SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Racial Disparities in Children: Protective Mechanisms and Severe Complications Related to MIS-C. J. Racial Ethn. Health Disparities 2022, 9, 1536–1542.
  19. Stierman, B.M.; Abrams, J.Y.P.; Godfred-Cato, S.E.D.; Oster, M.E.M.; Meng, L.; Yip, L.; Patel, P.M.; Balachandran, N.M.; Prezzato, E.M.; Pierce, T.M.; et al. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children in the United States, March 2020 to February 2021. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2021, 40, e400–e406.
  20. Zambrano, L.D.; Ly, K.N.; Link-Gelles, R.; Newhams, M.M.; Akande, M.; Wu, M.J.; Feldstein, L.R.; Tarquinio, K.M.; Sahni, L.C.; Riggs, B.J.; et al. Investigating Health Disparities Associated With Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children After SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2022, 41, 891–898.
  21. Hobbs, C.V.; Kim, S.S.; Vemula, P.; Inagaki, K.; Harrison, V.A.; Malloch, L.; Martin, L.M.; Singh, G.; Agana, U.; Williams, J.M.; et al. Active Surveillance With Seroprevalence-based Infection Rates Indicates Racial Disparities With Pediatric SARS-CoV-2 Requiring Hospitalization in Mississippi, March 2020–February 2021. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2022, 41, 736–741.
  22. Mody, A.; Pfeifauf, K.; Bradley, C.; Fox, B.; Hlatshwayo, M.G.; Ross, W.; Sanders-Thompson, V.; Maddox, K.J.; Reidhead, M.; Schootman, M.; et al. Understanding Drivers of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Racial Disparities: A Population-Level Analysis of COVID-19 Testing Among Black and White Populations. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 73, e2921–e2931.
  23. Graff, K.; Smith, C.; Silveira, L.; Jung, S.; Curran-Hays, S.M.; Jarjour, J.; Carpenter, L.B.; Pickard, K.B.; Mattiucci, M.; Fresia, J.B.; et al. Risk Factors for Severe COVID-19 in Children. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2021, 40, e137–e145.
  24. Mannheim, J.; Konda, S.; Logan, L.K. Racial, ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in SARS-CoV-2 infection amongst children. Paediatr. Périnat. Epidemiol. 2022, 36, 337–346.
  25. Brandt, K.; Goel, V.; Keeler, C.; Bell, G.J.; Aiello, A.E.; Corbie-Smith, G.; Wilson, E.; Fleischauer, A.; Emch, M.; Boyce, R.M. SARS-CoV-2 testing in North Carolina: Racial, ethnic, and geographic disparities. Health Place 2021, 69, 102576.
  26. Gualandi, N.; Mu, Y.; Bamberg, W.M.; Dumyati, G.; Harrison, L.H.; Lesher, L.; Nadle, J.; Petit, S.; Ray, S.M.; Schaffner, W.; et al. Racial Disparities in Invasive Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections, 2005–2014. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2018, 67, 1175–1181.
  27. Hansen, C.; Perofsky, A.C.; Burstein, R.; Famulare, M.; Boyle, S.; Prentice, R.; Marshall, C.; McCormick, B.J.J.; Reinhart, D.; Capodanno, B.; et al. Trends in Risk Factors and Symptoms Associated With SARS-CoV-2 and Rhinovirus Test Positivity in King County, Washington, June 2020 to July 2022. JAMA Netw. Open 2022, 5, e2245861.
  28. O’Halloran, A.C.; Holstein, R.; Cummings, C.; Kirley, P.D.; Alden, N.B.; Yousey-Hindes, K.; Anderson, E.J.; Ryan, P.; Kim, S.; Lynfield, R.; et al. Rates of Influenza-Associated Hospitalization, Intensive Care Unit Admission, and In-Hospital Death by Race and Ethnicity in the United States From 2009 to 2019. JAMA Netw. Open 2021, 4, e2121880.
  29. Artiga, S.; Hill, L. Racial Disparities in COVID-19 Impacts and Vaccinations for Children. KFF. 22 September 2021. Available online: https://www.kff.org/racial-equity-and-health-policy/issue-brief/racial-disparities-in-covid-19-impacts-and-vaccinations-for-children/ (accessed on 16 January 2023).
  30. Hamdan, L.; Vandekar, S.; Spieker, A.J.; Rahman, H.; Ndi, D.; Shekarabi, E.S.; Thota, J.; A Rankin, D.; Haddadin, Z.; Markus, T.; et al. Epidemiological Trends of Racial Differences in Early- and Late-onset Group B Streptococcus Disease in Tennessee. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2021, 73, e3634–e3640.
  31. Havers, F.P.; Delahoy, M.J.; Ujamaa, D.; Taylor, C.A.; Cummings, C.; Anglin, O.; Holstein, R.; Milucky, J.; O’Halloran, A.; Patel, K.; et al. Comparison of influenza and COVID-19-associated hospitalizations among children < 18 years old in the United States-FluSurv-NET (October-April 2017-2021) and COVID-NET (October 2020-September 2021). Clin. Infect. Dis. 2022, ciac388.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!
ScholarVision Creations
Feedback