Cu-Based Catalysts in Nitrogen Oxides by CO: History
View Latest Version
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Contributor:
Xiaoli Chen
,
Yaqi Liu
,
Yan Liu
,
Dianxing Lian
,
Mohaoyang Chen
,
Yongjun Ji
,
Liwen Xing
,
Ke Wu
,
Shaomian Liu

Selective catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxides (NOx) by CO (CO-SCR) to both N2 and CO2 is a promising way to simultaneously remove two harmful gases, CO and NOx, in automobile and factory exhaust gases. The development of efficient catalysts is the key challenge for the technology to be commercialized. The low-cost Cu-based catalysts have shown promising performance in CO-SCR, but there are some technical problems that obstruct their practical implementation, such as high reduction temperature and low O2, H2O, and SO2 resistance. An overview CO-SCR under O2-containing conditions over the Cu-based catalysts is discussed.

  • H2O
  • CO
  • Cu-based catalysts

1. Supported Catalysts

Compared to non-supported catalysts, supported catalysts have obvious advantages, such as high dispersion of active components and low amount. Among multifarious catalysts reported for NOx by CO (CO-SCR), supported Cu-based catalysts are the most extensively studied and have considerable application potential [1]. In this section, various types of supported Cu-based catalysts and their catalytic behavior in NO reduction by CO in the presence of O2 are summarized. Table 1 gives the catalytic performances of supported Cu-based catalysts for NO + CO reaction in the presence of O2 reported.
Table 1. Catalytic activity of various supported Cu-based catalysts for the NO + CO + O2 reaction.
Type Sample Tmax a
(°C)		 ηNOb
(%)		 SN2c
(%)		 ψ(NO) d
(%)		 ψ(CO)
(%)		 ψ(O2)
(%)		 F (mL min−1) e GHSV
(mL gAg−1 h−1) f		 Ref.
Mono-
metallic
catalysts		 0.5%Cu/Al2O3 500 --- --- 1 1 0.5 100 30,000 [2]
CuO/TiO2 500 54 --- 5 5 0.12 50 75,000 h−1 [3]
5Cu/AlPO4 400 78 48 0.2 1.5 0.65 60 36,000 [4]
Cu/SmCeO2/TiO2 300 50 --- 0.05 1 10 50 10,000 h−1 [5]
Cu/Ce0.1Al 400 100 --- 0.06 0.12 0.1 30 18,000 [6]
CuO/Al2O3 500 30   1 1 0.5 100 30,000 h−1 [7]
Cu/Al2O3 500 --- --- 1 1 0.5 100 30,000 [8]
Bimetallic catalysts Pt-Cu@M-Y 350 43 53 0.05 0.1 1 667 10,000 h−1 [9]
Ce-Cu-BTC 250 90 --- 0.1 0.1 5 --- --- [10]
Fe2Cu1/RHA 100 100 100 0.056 0.056 8.9 2400 11,220 h−1 [11]
Cu1:Ce3/Al2O3 420 71.8 --- 0.025 0.5 5 300 360,000 [12]
Cu1:Ce3/CNT 220 96 --- 0.025 0.5 0.3 300 12,600 h−1 [13]
K/Cu/SmCe@TiO2 330 97 --- 0.05 1 10 50 10,000 h−1 [14]
Cu-Mn/Al2O3 180 78 85 0.055 0.9 16 --- 10,000 h−1 [15]
Multi-
metallic
catalysts		 CuCoOx/TiO2 200 60 --- 0.1 1 2 1200 20,000 h−1 [16]
CuCoCe/2D-VMT 200 70 97 0.05 0.1 1 --- 102,000 h−1 [17]
Cu-Ni-Ce/AC 150 99.8 --- 0.4 4 5 1000 30,000 h−1 [18]
Cu-Ce-Fe-Co/TiO2 200 93 --- 0.02 1 6 --- 10,000 h−1 [19]
Cu-Ce-Fe-Mn/TiO2 200 82 --- 0.02 0.02 1 --- 10,000 h−1 [19]
a Tmax: Temperature corresponding to maximum NO conversion. b ηNO: The conversion of NO. c SN2: The selectivity of N2. d ψ(NO): The NO concentration in the feeding gas. e F: The volume flow rate of the feeding gas. f GHSV: Gas weight hourly space velocity.

1.1. Mono-Metallic Catalysts

The loading state of the metal, the nature of the support, and the interaction between the metal and the support will all affect the catalytic performance. Yamamoto et al. [2] studied the effects of supported elements, supports, and calcination temperature on the catalytic performance of NO-CO-O2 reaction. The Cu-based catalysts with different supports and loading amounts were investigated in detail, and the results suggest that 0.5 wt.% Cu/Al2O3 exhibited the highest catalytic performance. The support γ-Al2O3 itself can reduce NO to N2O but not N2, possessing a limited capability for the reduction of NO. Therefore, the addition of Cu to Al2O3 promotes the formation of N2. Additionally, the calcination temperature of the catalyst and Cu loading could affect the catalytic activity. When the calcination temperature was too high (>500 °C), the Cu species on the surface could slowly form aggregated Cu species, which preferentially oxidize CO without reducing nitrogen oxides (NOx), thereby resulting in a sharp decrease in catalytic performance. Moreover, when the Cu loading was 3 wt.%, the polymer-like Cu species were mainly present on the surface of the support. If the Cu loading was further increased to more than 5 wt.%, CuO species appeared on the catalyst surface. Both the polymer-like Cu species and CuO species mainly facilitate CO oxidation. With the 0.5 wt.% Cu loading, there was the generation of atomically dispersed Cu2+ species on γ-Al2O3. In this case, the oxidation activity of CO was weak, and a large amount of residual CO could interact with NO. Thus, the reduction activity of NO by CO is the highest. Nevertheless, Sierra-Pereira et al. [3] found that for CuO/TiO2, its activity increased with Cu loading from 2 wt.% to 10 wt.% in NO-CO-O2 reaction, and 10 wt.% CuO/TiO2 exhibited the highest catalytic performance, achieving 54% NO conversion at 500 °C.
In addition to the above single metal oxide support, metal oxide composite supports were also applied to optimize the denitration performance of Cu-based catalysts. AlPO4, which has two different types of surface hydroxyl groups, (AlOH) and (POH), is a kind of stable material with large specific surface area and acid properties [20]. Kacimi et al. [4] prepared a series of Cu/AlPO4 catalysts with different Cu loadings by Cu(II) ion complexes exchange, which leads to the formation of well-dispersed Cu(II) amino species. Among these catalysts, 5Cu/AlPO4, containing the largest amount of dispersed surface Cu(II) species, exhibited the best catalytic performance, achieving 90% NO conversion at 300 °C. Venegas et al. [5] reported that the Cu/SmCeO2@TiO2 catalyst with Cu supported on core–shell-structured SmCeO2@TiO2 achieved 50% NO conversion at 500 °C in the presence of 10 vol.% O2. Its superior catalytic performance was because CeO2 possessed excellent redox properties through the transfer between Ce3+ and Ce4+, thus increasing the oxidation activity of the Cu/SmCeO2@TiO2 catalyst. Moreover, the addition of Sm helped to maintain the thermal stability of the CeO2 phase. Core–shell-structured CeO2@TiO2 nanoparticles could also stabilize the involved Cu phase, preventing its migration and sinterization, and thus leading to higher activities [21]. Bai et al. [6] synthesized an efficient CuO/CeO2-Al2O3 catalyst, which exhibited excellent catalytic performance and superior resistance to O2 and SO2 for CO-SCR. The incorporation of Ce4+ was conducive to the enrichment of Cu atoms and the generation of synergistic oxygen vacancies on the surface of the catalyst, which improved the redox performance of the catalyst. Moreover, Cu2+ was favorable for the CO adsorption, while the unpaired electrons in the CeO2-Al2O3 support were favorable for the adsorption of NO.

1.2. Bimetallic Catalysts

Chen et al. [16] synthesized a series of CuCoOx/TiO2 catalysts and found that the CuCoOx/TiO2 catalyst able to generate the CuCo2O4 spinel exhibited the highest catalytic activity, reaching 98.9% NO conversion at 200 °C and in the absence of O2. However, when 2 vol.% O2 was introduced, the NO conversion decreased sharply to 60%. Liu et al. [15] investigated the denitration performance of various transition metals supported on Al2O3 pellets under O2-rich conditions (16 vol.%). Among these catalysts, Cu-Mn/Al2O3 with a molar ratio Cu:Mn of 1.5 displayed the best catalytic activity, achieving nearly 78% NO conversion and 85% N2 selectivity at 180 °C. Based on the density functional theory calculation, it was demonstrated that Mn had better O2 resistance and Cu had better H2O resistance. López et al. [14] prepared a novel core–shell-structured K/Cu/SmCe@TiO2 catalyst, giving 97% NO conversion at 330 °C in the presence of excess O2 (10 vol.%). The interaction between highly dispersed Cu species and K promoted the reduction of NO. Gholami et al. [13] found that the catalytic activity of the Cu1:Ce3/CNT catalyst (carbon nanotubes) was much better than that of the Cu1:Ce3/AC catalyst (activated carbon) in the presence of O2 (0.3 vol.%, O2/CO ≥ 0.6). The Cu1:Ce3/CNT catalyst displayed the highest NO conversion of 96% at 220 °C, attributed to its high concentration of surface oxygen vacancies (SOVs), high Cu+ species content, superior reducing capability, and the synergistic effect between SOV and Cu+ species. Furthermore, Gholami et al. [12] investigated the denitration performance of a string of Cu1:Ce3 catalysts supported on various supports (CNTs, AC, TiO2, γ-Al2O3, and SiC) in the presence of excess O2 (5 vol.%), and found that Cu1:Ce3/Al2O3 catalyst possessed the highest catalytic performance, with 71.8% NO conversion at 420 °C, mainly ascribed to the enrichment of catalytically active centers of Cu on the Al2O3 support. Interestingly, it was observed that with the increase in O2 concentration from 2% to 5%, the conversion of NO increased slightly. This was because the more O2 was adsorbed on the catalyst surface, the more adsorbed O was provided. The adsorbed O then reacted with the adsorbed CO to form CO2, which thus led to the generation of oxygen vacancies for the adsorption and dissociation of NO further. Moreover, this adsorbed O could also react with NO to NO2, which was quickly reduced by CO to N2. Metal organic frameworks (MOFs) have broad application prospects in the field of catalysis, due to their huge surface area, tailored compositions, and variable structures [22][23]. Zhang et al. [10] prepared the Cu-BTC (BTC = benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylate) and Ce-Cu-BTC catalysts, which are three-dimensional (3D) porous MOFs. Cu-BTC only exhibited 50% NO conversion at 250 °C, while Ce-modified Cu-BTC catalysts could achieve much higher NO conversion of 91%. Owing to the incorporation of Ce3+, the Ce-Cu-BTC catalyst had more SOVs, conducive to enhancing the adsorption of NOx on the surface of catalysts, as evidenced by the in situ DRIFTS spectrum. The enhanced NOx adsorption ultimately improved the catalytic activity for CO-SCR.
Recently, researcher's group used a simple impregnation method followed by reduction with H2 to synthesize a Pt-Cu@M-Y catalyst, which consists of sub-nanometric Pt on Cu nanoparticles confined in the NaOH-modified Y-zeolite. The Pt-Cu@M-Y catalyst with only 0.04 wt.% Pt loading showed superior catalytic activity for NO + CO reaction, with NO conversion and N2 selectivity nearly 100% at 250 °C. This enhanced activity originated from the synergistic catalysis of Pt and Cu, in which NO was mainly adsorbed on sub-nanometric Pt, and the generated interfaces between Cu nanoparticles and surface CuOx species served as the dissociation sites of NO. However, when 1 vol.% O2 was introduced (O2/CO = 10), the NO conversion decreased to 43% and N2 selectivity dropped to 53% at 350 °C, due to the preferential oxidation of CO and NO by O2 at high temperatures.

1.3. Multi-Metallic Catalysts

Pan et al. [19] synthesized a series of Cu-based and Mn-based catalysts by the wet impregnation method and applied them to the CO-SCR reaction. It was found that Cu-Ce-Fe-Co/TiO2 and Mn-Ce-Fe-Co/TiO2 exhibited better catalytic activity in the absence of O2, both reaching full NO conversion at 250 °C. However, the presence of O2 largely restricts the NO reduction efficiency. Comparatively, Cu-Ce-Fe-Co/TiO2 showed better tolerance to O2 than Mn-Ce-Fe-Co/TiO2. When 6 vol % O2 was fed, the Cu-Ce-Fe-Co/TiO2 catalyst still exhibited 93% NO conversion and 74.3% NOx conversion at 200 °C ([NO] = 200 ppm, [CO] = 200 ppm), indicating that only a part of NO was oxidized. The enhanced catalytic performance of Cu-Ce-Fe-Co/TiO2 may owe to its superior reducibility, more oxygen vacancies, and better oxygen mobility. Wang et al. [18] synthesized a Cu-Ni-Ce/AC catalyst by the ultrasonic equal volume impregnation method. This catalyst exhibited extremely high catalytic activity in the presence of O2 (5 vol.%), reaching 99.8% NO conversion at 150 °C. In this case, the doping of Ce promoted the uniform dispersion of Cu and Ni and formed many reaction units on the surface of the catalyst, enhancing the adsorption abilities of CO and NO and thus improving the catalytic performance. Two-dimensional (2D) vermiculite (VMT) is a natural layered clay mineral with a unique two-dimensional structure and high-temperature stability, widely used as a support and applied in the fields of photocatalysis and heterogeneous catalysis. Liu et al. [17] synthesized a CuCoCe/2D-VMT catalyst by the impregnation method. It exhibited superior catalytic activity in the coexistence of 1 vol.% O2 and 5 vol.% H2O, reaching 70% NO conversion and 97% N2 selectivity at 200 °C. They found that the doping of Ce could reduce the reduction temperature and promote the formation of oxygen vacancies, giving the CuCoCe/2D-VMT sample more active centers, thus improving its catalytic performance. This deduction was confirmed by the Raman spectrum, in which the CuCoCe/2D-VMT sample had a higher concentration of oxygen vacancies than the CuCo/2D-VMT sample. Similar results were also obtained by XPS characterization. CuCoCe/2D-VMT had more adsorbed oxygen (denoted as Oβ).

2. Non-Supported Catalysts

Besides a large number of reported Cu-based supported catalysts, some non-supported Cu-based catalysts also have certain O2 resistance in the CO-SCR reaction. Mehandjiev et al. [24] first reported that CuCo2O4 had the ability to reduce NO by CO in the presence of O2. Furthermore, Panayotov et al. [25] found that CuxCo3−xO4 spinels possessed excellent catalytic performance for CO-SCR under O2-containing conditions than CuO and Co3O4. Additionally, in the presence of 650 ppm O2, the catalytic activity increased with the Cu content. Ivanka et al. [26] prepared CuO-MnOx (1.5 < x < 2) catalysts by coprecipitation and studied their catalytic performance in the presence of O2. They found that the degree of NO conversion to N2 achieved by CuO-MnOx (Cu/Cu + Mn up to 0.53) under O2-containing conditions was similar to that under O2-free conditions. This could be explained as follows. After the introduction of O2, NO quickly reacted with it to produce NO2. Moreover, the reduction of NO2 by CO was faster than CO oxidation. Therefore, N2 and CO2 were finally generated. Sun et al. [27] synthesized the CuCe mixed metal oxides, which showed superior NO conversion and N2 selectivity, both maintaining more than 90% in a wide temperature window in the absence of O2. Nevertheless, when 1% O2 was introduced, the NO conversion dropped rapidly to 0 within 3.5 h. The NO conversion could gradually recover to the initial value after the O2 was stopped. This result indicated that CO preferentially reacts with O2, resulting in the decrease in NO conversion in the presence of O2. Wen et al. [28] synthesized mixed CuCeMgAlO oxides by coprecipitation, which possessed higher NO conversion than CuMgAlO and CeMgAlO for NO + CO + O2 reaction. The superior catalytic performance of CuCeMgAlO can be explained by the synergistic effect generated by the interaction of Cu and Ce. In addition, when 1% H2O was introduced, the NO conversion over CuCeMgAlO was significantly improved from 50% to 100% at 250 °C, but both CuMgAlO and CeMgAlO lost their catalytic activity completely. Moreover, when 500 ppm SO2 was introduced, the NO conversion dropped rapidly over CuMgAlO and CeMgAlO; however, CuCeMgAlO still maintained 100% NO conversion at 720 °C. This suggests that CuCeMgAlO possesses high activity for NO + CO + O2 reaction and excellent resistance to H2O and SO2 poisoning.

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/catal12111402

References

  1. Gholami, Z.; Luo, G.; Gholami, F.; Yang, F. Recent Advances in Selective Catalytic Reduction of NOx by Carbon Monoxide for Flue Gas Cleaning Process: A Review. Catal. Rev. 2021, 63, 68–119.
  2. Yamamoto, T.; Tanaka, T.; Kuma, R.; Suzuki, S.; Amano, F.; Shimooka, Y.; Kohno, Y.; Funabiki, T.; Yoshida, S. NO Reduction with CO in the Presence of O2 over Al2O3-Supported and Cu-Based Catalysts. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2002, 4, 2449–2458.
  3. Sierra-Pereira, C.A.; Urquieta-González, E.A. Reduction of NO with CO on CuO or Fe2O3 Catalysts Supported on TiO2 in the Presence of O2, SO2 and Water Steam. Fuel 2014, 118, 137–147.
  4. Kacimi, M.; Ziyad, M.; Liotta, L.F. Cu on Amorphous AlPO4: Preparation, Characterization and Catalytic Activity in NO Reduction by CO in Presence of Oxygen. Catal. Today 2015, 241, 151–158.
  5. Venegas, F.; López, N.; Sánchez-Calderón, L.; Aguila, G.; Araya, P.; Guo, X.; Zhu, Y.; Guerrero, S. The Transient Reduction of NO with CO and Naphthalene in the Presence of Oxygen Using a Core-Shell SmCeO2@TiO2-Supported Copper Catalyst. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2019, 9, 3408–3415.
  6. Bai, Y.; Bian, X.; Wu, W. Catalytic Properties of CuO/CeO2-Al2O3 Catalysts for Low Concentration NO Reduction with CO. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 463, 435–444.
  7. Amano, F.; Suzuki, S.; Yamamoto, T.; Tanaka, T. One-Electron Reducibility of Isolated Copper Oxide on Alumina for Selective NO-CO Reaction. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2006, 64, 282–289.
  8. Wen, B.; He, M.; Schrum, E.; Li, C. NO Reduction and CO Oxidation over Cu/Ce/Mg/Al Mixed Oxide Catalyst in FCC Operation. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2002, 180, 187–192.
  9. Li, L.; Liu, S.; Jiang, R.; Ji, Y.; Li, H.; Guo, X.; Jia, L.; Zhong, Z.; Su, F. Subnanometric Pt on Cu Nanoparticles Confined in Y-Zeolite: Highly-Efficient Catalysts for Selective Catalytic Reduction of NOx by CO. ChemCatChem 2021, 13, 1568–1577.
  10. Zhang, Y.; Zhao, L.; Duan, J.; Bi, S. Insights into DeNOx Processing over Ce-Modified Cu-BTC Catalysts for the CO-SCR Reaction at Low Temperature by in Situ DRIFTS. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020, 234, 116081.
  11. Teng, Z.; Huang, S.; Fu, L.; Xu, H.; Li, N.; Zhou, Q. Study of a Catalyst Supported on Rice Husk Ash for NO Reduction with Carbon Monoxide. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2020, 10, 1431–1443.
  12. Gholami, Z.; Luo, G.; Gholami, F. The Influence of Support Composition on the Activity of Cu:Ce Catalysts for Selective Catalytic Reduction of NO by CO in the Presence of Excess Oxygen. New J. Chem. 2020, 44, 709–718.
  13. Gholami, Z.; Luo, G. Low-Temperature Selective Catalytic Reduction of NO by CO in the Presence of O2 over Cu:Ce Catalysts Supported by Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2018, 57, 8871–8883.
  14. López, N.; Aguila, G.; Araya, P.; Guerrero, S. Highly Active Copper-Based 2 Core-Shell Catalysts for the Selective Reduction of Nitric Oxide with Carbon Monoxide in the Presence of Oxygen. Catal. Commun. 2018, 104, 17–21.
  15. Liu, K.; Yu, Q.; Qin, Q.; Wang, C. Selective Catalytic Reduction of Nitric Oxide with Carbon Monoxide over Alumina-Pellet-Supported Catalysts in the Presence of Excess Oxygen. Environ. Technol. 2018, 39, 1878–1885.
  16. Chen, X.; Zhang, J.; Huang, Y.; Tong, Z.; Huang, M. Catalytic Reduction of Nitric Oxide with Carbon Monoxide on Copper-Cobalt Oxides Supported on Nano-Titanium Dioxide. J. Environ. Sci. 2009, 21, 1296–1301.
  17. Liu, Z.; Yu, F.; Pan, K.; Zhou, X.; Sun, R.; Tian, J.; Wan, Y.; Dan, J.; Dai, B. Two-Dimensional Vermiculite Carried CuCoCe Catalysts for CO-SCR in the Presence of O2 and H2O: Experimental and DFT Calculation. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 422, 130099.
  18. Wang, D.; Huang, B.; Shi, Z.; Long, H.; Li, L.; Yang, Z.; Dai, M. Influence of Cerium Doping on Cu-Ni/Activated Carbon Low-Temperature CO-SCR Denitration Catalysts. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 18458–18467.
  19. Pan, K.L.; Young, C.W.; Pan, G.T.; Chang, M.B. Catalytic Reduction of NO by CO with Cu-Based and Mn-Based Catalysts. Catal. Today 2020, 348, 15–25.
  20. Rebenstorf, B.; Lindblad, T.; Andersson, S.L.T. Amorphous AlPO4 as Catalyst Support 2. Characterization of Amorphous Aluminum Phosphates. J. Catal. 1991, 128, 293–302.
  21. Li, G.; Tang, Z. Noble Metal Oxide Core/Yolk-Shell Nanostructures as Catalysts: Recent Progress and Perspective. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 3995–4011.
  22. Kaur, R.; Kaur, A.; Umar, A.; Anderson, W.A.; Kansal, S.K. Metal Organic Framework (MOF) Porous Octahedral Nanocrystals of Cu-BTC: Synthesis, Properties and Enhanced Adsorption Properties. Mater. Res. Bull. 2019, 109, 124–133.
  23. Wang, B.; Xie, L.-H.; Wang, X.; Liu, X.-M.; Li, J.; Li, J.-R. Applications of Metal-Organic Frameworks for Green Energy and Environment: New Advances in Adsorptive Gas Separation, Storage and Removal. Green Energy Environ. 2018, 3, 191–228.
  24. Mehandjiev, D.; Panayotov, D.; Khristova, M. Catalytic Reduction of NO with CO over CuxCo3−xO4 Spinels. React. Kinet. Catal. Lett. 1987, 33, 273–277.
  25. Panayotov, D.; Khristova, M.; Mehandjiev, D. Application of the Transient Response Technique to the Study of CO + NO + O2 Interaction on CuxCo3-xO4 Catalysts. J. Catal. 1995, 156, 219–228.
  26. Spassova, I.; Khristova, M.; Panayotov, D.; Mehandjiev, D. Coprecipitated CuO-MnOx Catalysts for Low-Temperature CO-NO and CO-NO-O2 Reactions. J. Catal. 1999, 185, 43–57.
  27. Sun, R.; Yu, F.; Wan, Y.; Pan, K.; Li, W.; Zhao, H.; Dan, J.; Dai, B. Reducing N2O Formation over CO-SCR Systems with CuCe Mixed Metal Oxides. ChemCatChem 2021, 13, 2709–2718.
  28. Wen, B.; He, M. Study of the Cu-Ce Synergism for NO Reduction with CO in the Presence of O2, H2O and SO2 in FCC Operation. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2002, 37, 75–82.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!
ScholarVision Creations
Feedback