Phycoerythrin from Blue-Green Algae: History
View Latest Version
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Contributor:
Hui Teng Tan
,
Fatimah Md. Yusoff
,
Yam Sim Khaw
,
Nur Amirah Izyan Noor Mazli
,
Muhammad Farhan Nazarudin
,
Noor Azmi Shaharuddin
,
Tomoyo Katayama
,
Siti Aqlima Ahmad

Phycoerythrin (PE) is a colored, water-soluble pigment–protein complex from the phycobiliprotein (PBP) family and is predominantly found in rhodophytes, cryptophytes, and cyanobacteria. It is a 240 kDa oligomeric chromoprotein with an intense pink/red color. This PBP is a light-harvesting accessory pigment that absorbs wavelengths that chlorophyll cannot. In terms of energy transfer, PE is the first PBP to absorb light and emits energy to phycocyanin (PC) and allophycocyanin (APC), consecutively. PE is characterized by its original spectrum properties, such as fluorescence emission. On the other hand, previous PBP research was focused on PC, and the scientific community realized that PE is endowed with antioxidant potential due to its ability to scavenge free radicals. This allows them to prevent or delay the onset of potentially fatal diseases, such as cancer, heart disease, and hepatotoxicity. The potent antioxidant activity promotes human health and boosts the immune response against infections. These bioactive compounds also resist photooxidative damage, which would otherwise have an adverse impact on crucial cellular machineries, such as proteins, lipids, and DNA. In comparison to PC and APC, the unique fluorescent properties of PE have made it a useful tool in the diagnosis and treatment of tumors. 

  • cyanobacteria
  • extraction
  • purification
  • application
  • stability
  • commercial

1. Cultivation Methods

Cyanobacteria can be cultivated in open systems (tanks/ponds or raceways) or closed systems (photobioreactors). The high risk of contamination is a critical issue that impedes the mass production of cyanobacterial-phycoerythrin (C-PE) in open systems [1]. Enclosed photobioreactors are recommended as a preferable choice for pure, large-scale C-PE production since they allow for consistent light provision, temperature control, and carbon dioxide distribution as well as reduced contamination risk [2].

1.1. Cultivation Mode

Cyanobacteria cultivation can be carried out in a variety of modes, including heterotrophic, photoautotrophic, and mixotrophic settings. Heterotrophic mode is usually performed in dark or harsh environments where cyanobacteria need to acclimate to the environment by consuming available organic compounds (i.e., acetate, glucose) as a carbon source [3]. Although the organic compound promoted the growth of cyanobacteria, it also increased the potential for contamination, resulting in health risks within food industries [4]. Photoautotrophic cyanobacteria use natural sunlight as an energy source and atmospheric air as a carbon dioxide supply. As a result, when the light intensity is too high (photo-inhibition) or too low (photo-limitation), the biomass is affected and reduced [1]. Mixotrophic cultivation combines heterotrophic and photoautotrophic modes; both are performed in the presence of sunlight and carbon sources. Specifically, it is a dual-limiting system in which low light intensities or low organic carbon substrate concentrations can limit cell growth. At the same time, high light intensities or high carbon substrate concentrations can also suppress cell growth [4]. Previous research has shown that cyanobacteria cultivated in a mixotrophic environment are more resistant to light stress than photoautotrophs [5]. However, not all cyanobacteria can grow in mixotrophic or heterotrophic conditions [1].

1.2. Light

Light condition is the major factor that affects C-PE accumulation. This condition involves not just light intensity but also light color and photoperiod. It has generally been documented that there is a preference for low to medium light intensity for C-PE production [6]. This is related to the role of PE in increasing the range of light absorption in the photosynthetic system. Thus, in low light-intensity conditions, the cyanobacteria will stimulate PE production to capture more light and energy for growth.
In terms of light color, previous research has found that cyanobacteria cultivated under green light accumulate more C-PE compared to other light spectra [7][8][9]. Under green light, the PSII overexcites and induces a transition to State II, resulting in more excitation energy transfer from the PSII to the PSI. This transfer enables PE to get the green light and use it to activate the photochemistry of both photosystems (PSI and PSII) [10]. Hence, the light color changed the composition of phycobilisomes via CCA. Hsieh Lo et al. (2019) have discussed the mechanism of complementary chromatic adaptation (CCA), but further study is needed to explore it in detail [1]. Further, Mishra et al. (2012) postulated that C-PE production could be stimulated under blue light since the light absorption PE ranges from 450 to 570 nm, allowing it to capture more blue light (460–475 mm) [9][11]. On the other hand, photoperiod affects the balance of heterotrophic and photoautotrophic metabolisms. Although scientific literature has shown that a dark period is always required for phycobiliprotein production, the optimal photoperiod for C-PE accumulation has yet to be determined [12][13]. Literature has shown that a photoperiod of 16 hours of light and 8 hours of darkness was the ideal condition for phycobiliprotein (PBP) synthesis [6][13]. Nevertheless, most research on C-PE yield used a photoperiod of 12 hours of light and 12 hours of darkness in their study, despite the fact that this parameter has not been optimized for C-PE yet [7][9][14][15][16].

1.3. Temperature, pH, and Salinity

Temperature is another major factor influencing cyanobacterial growth and C-PE productivity since it directly impacts cell membrane fluidity, nutrient availability, and absorption [1][12]. The ideal temperature for target pigment synthesis varies with different cyanobacterial species or strains, depending on their adaptability and tolerance [1]. Extremely high temperatures denature enzymes or proteins, inhibiting growth and decreasing C-PE production, whereas extremely low temperatures will cause certain cyanobacterial metabolism to malfunction [17]. Previous studies reported that temperature in the range of 30–36 °C was ideal for the growth of most cyanobacteria [12]. For example, the optimal temperature of Anabaena sp. was reported at 30 °C  [7]. Studies to optimize temperature, focusing on C-PE production, still received little attention.
pH fluctuations affect nutrient solubility and bioavailability, the transportation of molecules across cytoplasmic membranes, enzyme activity, photosynthetic electron transport, and cell physiology [18][19]. Most cyanobacteria have been found to prefer an alkaline environment for growth and phycobiliprotein production. Extreme pH levels will change the charge on protein, eventually leading to protein denaturation [18]. The ideal pH for cyanobacteria growth is strain-dependent, ranging from 6.0 to 10.0 and never below a pH of 3.0 or exceeding a pH of 12.0 [6]. However, the study of the optimal pH for high C-PE production is still limited to a few strains. The neutral pH of 7.0 is reported to be ideal for high C-PE accumulation in Nostoc sp. and Spirulina platensis, while a pH of 8 is suitable for Anabaena sp. and Nodularia sphaerocarpa [11][18][19][20].
Salt stress decreases plant growth and metabolite production, which are usually related to lower photosynthesis [21]. The optimal salinity depends on the strain. Halophilic cyanobacteria can thrive in hypersaline environments, but high salinity can inhibit the photosystem and electron transport chain in non-tolerant strains [19][22]. Furthermore, excessive sodium ions can cause phycobilisome detachment from the thylakoid membrane, reducing photosynthetic activity and nutrient absorption [12][23]. Pagels et al. (2019) compiled a few pieces of research that looked into the effect of salinity on the growth and phycocyanin production of marine cyanobacteria [6]. Yet, there is a lack of research on the effect of salinity on C-PE production. Sharma et al. (2014) optimized the salinity level suitable for Spirulina platensis and found that a 0.4 M salt concentration is optimal for increasing the C-PE content [19].

1.4. Nutrients (Nitrogen, Carbon, and Phosphorus)

Nutrient uptake is crucial for cyanobacterial growth and pigment production. Nitrogen is one of the important macronutrients since it is required to synthesize nucleic acids and proteins [24]. Furthermore, nitrogen, which serves as the primary nitrogen store within the cell, is essential for cell viability and can regulate the production of PBP [25]. The nitrogen supply in the growth medium influences metabolite production, as it alters the nutrient assimilation mechanism within the cell [6]. Nitrogen deprivation can impair cellular development rates and contribute to a phenomenon known as chlorosis, which provokes phycobiliprotein (PBP) degradation and leads to photosynthesis downregulation [25][26]. The type of nitrogen source and the amounts required are species-dependent [6]. Cyanobacteria have been demonstrated in studies to be capable of assimilating a wide range of nitrogen sources, including nitrate (NO3−), ammonium (NH4+), nitrite (NO2−), and urea. A few research studies have compared various nitrogen sources on C-PE synthesis. Most cyanobacteria (including Arthrospira platensis, Fischerella sp., Nodularia sphaerocarpa, and Spirulina maxima) prefer nitrate concentrations ranging from 0.2 to 2.5 g L−1 [20][27][28][29]. Anabaena fertilissima supplemented with nitrite reported the best C-PE production, whereas an ammonium source was reflected in Phormidium sp. and Pseudoscillatoria sp. [11][27]. The addition of an inappropriate nitrogen source (especially ammonium) will result in a significant influx of ammonium ions and a change in pH, which will be toxic to the cell and reduce C-PE production [6][27]. Liotenberg et al. (1996), on the other hand, discovered that ammonium and nitrate sources may alter PBP proportion differentially depending on the cyanobacterial strain. The study revealed that the growth of Calothrix sp. in the presence of ammonium, as compared to nitrate, increased the PC content by 46% but resulted in 35% lower intracellular levels of PE [30]. Given that a PE monomer contains more tetrapyrrole chromophores than the other two phycobilin monomers, it may be assumed that fewer chromophores are required to construct phycobilisomes in ammonium-grown cells than in nitrate-grown cells [30][31]. As phycobilisomes constitute a main cellular investment, with phycobiliproteins accounting for up to 50% of the cell’s soluble protein, a lower nitrogen level, per tetrapyrrole, might be more suitable in nutrient-limited conditions [32]. This statement was consistent with the findings of Hemlata (2009) and Simeunovie et al. (2013) that Anabaena sp. and Nostoc sp. produced higher C-PE when no additional nitrogen source was supplied [12][33]. Further, the nitrogen fixation capabilities of certain cyanobacteria (i.e., Nostoc sp., Oscillatoria sp., and Trichodesmium sp.) can be driven when the inorganic nitrogen source is limited and inhibited when the inorganic nitrogen source is abundant [19][34]. Non-nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria are normally limited by nitrogen, but nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria may use ubiquitous atmospheric nitrogen, giving them a competitive advantage in nitrogen-limiting conditions [35]. Yet, although some cyanobacteria can fix atmospheric nitrogen, it is typically preferable to supply the medium with nitrogen [6].
Phosphorus has major structural roles in nucleic acids and is functional in various metabolic processes [25]. A phosphorus deficiency will affect respiration, photosynthesis, and the activities of ATP-dependent enzymes [25][36]. However, phosphorus itself has little effect on growth and pigment content [24]. Thus, only a few studies on the correlation between phosphorus and C-PE productivity have been published, and the main phosphorus source comes from K2HPO4 [28][37]. Instead, the effect of the nitrogen:phosphorus (N:P) ratio has received great attention [25][38][39]. N2-fixation is phosphorus-dependent, as the process needs a high amount of photosynthetically derived energy [40]. Hence, an optimal N:P ratio is crucial. While the N:P ratio can reveal which of these two nutrients is the underlying limiting factor of cyanobacterial growth and pigment synthesis, it is also a better indicator than each nutrient’s absolute concentration [38]. The extreme nutrient-limiting condition is usually encountered when the external N:P is less than 20:1 [39].
Carbon is another essential nutrient that contributes to all organic compounds, and a sufficient carbon source enables cyanobacteria to proliferate and accumulate metabolites of interest [1]. Carbon, like nitrogen, can be utilized by cyanobacteria in both organic and inorganic sources. The flexibility of shifting toward different sources makes the mixotrophic cyanobacteria more independent of light, which does not limit growth as in autotrophic mode, and carbon assimilation can be supplemented by organic compounds, as in the heterotrophic mode. To be more specific, mixotrophic cultured cyanobacteria can use resources more efficiently and produce more biomass by taking advantage of both heterotrophic and photoautotrophic conditions. The higher biomass may cause cells to self-shade, boosting pigment synthesis, such as PE [24]. The dose of carbon sources varied between strains and was highly dependent on light conditions and culture period [6]. For example, upon pretreatment with either light or darkness, Westiellopsis prolifica used exogenous organic carbon more quickly in the light than in the dark incubation [41]. On the contrary, Calothrix elenkenii utilizes glucose more quickly in the dark, especially after prolonged incubation [42]. The culture media of cyanobacteria typically contained NaHCO3 as the carbon source [19][37][43]. Most research concluded that sucrose was the best organic carbon source. Sucrose (5 g L−1)−1 has been shown to enhance C-PE concentration in Anabaena azollae, Anabaena fertilissima, and Nodularia sphaerocarpa (up to 90%) when compared to fructose and glucose [11][20][44]. Sugarcane molasses, as an alternate source of pure sucrose, has been found to be the most promising substrate for producing C-PE in Nostoc sp. [45]. PBP synthesis may increase in the presence of sucrose due to the production of ATP and higher energy-related assimilation [42]. The addition of glucose in the medium has also been shown to enhance growth and C-PE synthesis in Calothrix sp. and Nostoc sp. [42][45][46][47]. Furthermore, glycerol can substitute glucose in enhancing PBP synthesis in Nostoc sp. [46] Lignite, a low-rank carbon byproduct of numerous carbon extractions, has an organic nature and benefits microbial nutrition [6]. Hence, its use at a low concentration (0.06 g L−1) positively affected growth and C-PE synthesis in Spirulina platensis [48].

2. Downstream Processing of C-PE

2.1. Extraction of C-PE

C-PE downstream processes are typically multi-step and sophisticated in order to assure quantity, purity, and quality [14]. A proper extraction should allow for the recovery of the greatest amount of C-PE with minimal contamination, which will be valuable for future analyses of its chemical structure and biological activity [14][49].
The selection of the solvent is primordial for efficient C-PE extraction. The choice of extraction buffer must take into account not merely the polarity and solubility of C-PE, but also the economics, availability of the solvent, and simplicity of use [6][14]. The phosphate buffer and tris chloride buffer are the common buffer types reported for the extraction of C-PE. These buffers have been widely used for PBP extraction in cyanobacteria and seaweed and have been proven effective [50][51][52]. An acetate buffer at a pH of 5 is occasionally employed as a buffer for C-PE extraction [53]. However, research by Julianti et al. (2019) and Zavrel et al. (2018) demonstrated that the C-PC yield and purity extracted with an acetate buffer are lower than that extracted with a phosphate buffer [54][55]. A comparatively low-cost, double-distilled water was shown to extract the highest quantity of C-PC, with no significant difference in comparison to PC amounts extracted using a phosphate buffer [56]. However, there is no information on utilizing double-distilled water for C-PE extraction. The pH solvent used in most C-PE extractions was between a pH of 7 and a pH of 8. Dilute or low-molarity buffers could provide better extraction than high-molarity buffers due to the salting-in effect [14][57]. Since a pH of 8 is not suitable for other proteins, it can avoid undesirable contamination, making crude extract purification easier [14].
Cyanobacteria cell walls are multi-layered and difficult to disrupt, yet cell rupture is needed to extract the C-PE. The crude extraction can be accomplished using several methods, including enzymatic digestion, high-pressure homogenization, ultrasonication, or continuous freezing and thawing of the biomass [56]. The methods chosen must consider factors such as the physical strength of the cell wall, stability, and the composition of the cyanobacteria [58]. Enzymatic extraction can be completed by using lysozyme to enzymatically digest the biomass. This enzymatic hydrolysis is particularly effective in seaweed, which has a strong cell covering or outer sheath to protect the cells [59]. Nevertheless, as cyanobacterial cells lack special protection, purified enzymes may not be required. Mechanical methods, such as grinding, crushing, homogenization, or sonication, will generate heat transferred to the biomass solvent, causing the C-PE extracts to be denatured even before they are entirely extracted into the buffer [14][50]. Instead, repeated freezing and thawing were recommended, as it is the gentler approach from the protein perspective and no heat was generated throughout the process [14]. Thus, it is the most commonly used technique for C-PE extraction [16][51][60]. Ghosh and Mishra (2020) also concluded that the freezing–thawing method was the best way to achieve the cell disruption of marine cyanobacteria during their screening of several potential C-PE extraction procedures [14].

2.2. Purification of C-PE

Refined purification can increase the commercial value of C-PE extract. Purifying C-PE is time-consuming and labor-intensive since most cyanobacteria produce PC and allophycocyanin (APC) along with the target PE [61]. Although the ultrafiltration process improves C-PE purity, it reduces C-PE concentration due to thermal and mechanical shear forces [60]. Nowadays, PBP is usually purified from crude extract using at least one of the following methods: precipitation, centrifugation, or chromatography. According to Kamble et al. (2018), combining different methodologies is more beneficial for increasing the purity of C-PE while retaining a better yield [53][60]. The first step can be completed by ammonium sulfate precipitation [6]. Ammonium sulfate is water soluble at low temperatures, which inhibits bacterial growth and assists in protein concentration and purification [62]. Different amounts and concentrations of ammonium sulfate were utilized as a salting-out agent to exclude unwanted proteins and boost the purity of C-PE [60]. The precipitated C-PE was further purified based on size, color, and polarity using chromatography approaches, including size-exclusion and ion-exchange chromatography. Size-exclusion chromatography, also known as gel-permeation chromatography, commonly uses Sephadex as a gel filtration resin to remove high-molecular-weight proteins [51][52]. Diethylaminoethyl cellulose (DEAE-C), a positively charged resin, was employed in ion-exchange chromatography to eliminate unwanted protein [52][53][60]. A more developed, aqueous, two-phase system has been used effectively as a low-cost alternative to recover C-PC, but no studies have been conducted to assess its efficiency on C-PE [63].

3. Strategies to Improve the Stability of C-PE

Another prerequisite for large-scale production and acceptability in the industry is the stability of C-PE [1]. C-PE is unstable and susceptible from the time it is extracted from the biomass. As C-PE is a protein, pH, temperature, or light changes may modify its molecular structure. For these reasons, C-PE degradation is possible and can be significant during or after the extraction and purification process, resulting in its shorter shelf life [64]. The pH level is the major factor influencing C-PE aggregation and dissociation, either in monomer, trimer, or hexamer forms in the solution. The most stable structure of C-PE, the hexameric form, predominates at a pH of 7 and easily dissociates at a higher or lower pH [65][66]. C-PE extracted in the study completed by Ghosh et al. (2020) was stable within the pH range of 3–8. This broad pH range facilitates its use in the food and beverage industries. As most beverages have an acidic pH, a stable colorant under such conditions is beneficial [14]. Further, it is recommended to keep extracted C-PE at a low temperature. Temperatures exceeding 40 °C reduce the number of alpha helices, resulting in a loss of stability and gradual degradation [67]. It is also not suggested to keep C-PE at temperatures above room temperature since C-PE is more sensitive to deterioration by microorganisms [65]. Sub-zero temperatures are favorable for long-term preservation since they restrict protein water activity to a minimum level [14]. Furthermore, it is preferable to keep C-PE in the dark [1]. Long-term exposure to high light intensity causes C-PE to lose its chromophores, resulting in color degradation and stability loss [67].
Several stabilizing approaches or strategies have been introduced to increase C-PE stability, as outlined by Hsieh-Lo et al. (2019) [1]. The addition of effective preservatives is the most popular and convenient method. Although dithiothreitol (DTT) and sodium azide (NaN3) are commonly employed in C-PE for analytical purposes, both are poisonous and not suitable for use in food [66]. Thus, only edible preservatives can be used to produce food-grade C-PE. According to Mishra et al. (2010), the stability of C-PE treated with citric acid is higher than that treated with sucrose, calcium chloride, or sodium chloride as preservatives [66]. Benzoic acid is another useful edible additive. It has potent antioxidant properties that can preserve and enhance the stability of C-PE while also acting as an antibacterial agent that inhibits bacterial growth [64].
Crosslinking is another non-additive technology used effectively on PE to increase stability [68]. It is a method of reinforcing the folded structure of a protein by covalently joining two chemical groups on its surface using bifunctional reagents, either intermolecularly or intramolecularly [69]. The intramolecular crosslinking of the protein molecule with silver nanoparticles, Ag+, has been shown to prevent protein aggregation and enhance the thermal stability of PE [68]. Other approaches, such as complex formation and microencapsulation, have been established on PC; however, more study is required to determine the efficacy of employing such techniques on PE [70][71][72]. At present, most of the established strategies have focused on enhancing thermal stability. Hence, stability regarding other factors needs to be explored so that extracted C-PE may be widely marketed across various fields.

4. Application of C-PE

4.1. PE in Pharmaceuticals, Nutraceuticals, & Therapeutics

Several bioactive compounds, such as zeaxanthin, α-tocopherol, and caffeic acid, have already been employed in disease prevention and treatment. However, cyanobacterial bilin is more effective than other phytochemicals, attracting the attention of researchers [73]. The study of PBP bioactivities has emerged in recent years, albeit such study is still restricted and mainly focused on PC [6]. Indeed, PE displays a variety of bioactivities that allow it to be used in the nutraceutical, pharmaceutical, and therapeutic industries.
The accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) causes oxidative stress, which stimulates organisms to produce bioactive compounds in response to their defensive mechanisms. An enzymatic or non-enzymatic antioxidant approach can neutralize these ROS. PBP is an example of a non-enzymatic antioxidant mechanism that scavenges ROS and reduces oxidation [6]. Sonani et al. (2014) discovered that C-PE isolated from Lyngbya sp. exhibited higher in vitro, dose-dependent, antioxidant activity than C-PC and C-APC [52]. This might be because C-PE exhibits antioxidant activity through the main pathway, scavenging already produced ROS via a redox reaction, and has lower chelating and reducing ability [74]. Other potential antioxidant properties of C-PE still require further investigation. In addition to its antioxidant capabilities, C-PE from Lyngbya sp. also had anti-Alzheimer’s and anti-aging properties [52][74]. Phycobilins, such as PCB, PEB, PUB, and PVB, have also been potent phytochemical inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 Mpro and PLpro proteases [75].
Anti-tumor activities and underlying mechanisms were primarily proven in the literature employing C-PC in medications [6][76]. C-PE differs structurally and spectroscopically from C-PC, suggesting that it may potentially have unique anti-tumor properties [77]. R-PE has been incorporated into photodynamic therapy (PDT), a treatment method for lung, stomach, skin, and oral tumors [77][78]. Effective PDT can selectively destroy cancer or tumor cells by producing ROS-mediated damage, vascular damage, and immune system activation while causing no damage to normal cells [77]. R-PE and its subunit had a stronger PDT effect as well as an inhibitory effect on human liver cancer cell SMC 7221 and mouse tumor cell S180. The smaller size of the β-subunit allows it to access the tumor cell easily. Furthermore, it emitted more significant fluorescence, which was employed as a fluorescent marker for detecting binding sites [78]. In this regard, future research could focus on the role and dosage of C-PE in tumor therapy.
Oral treatment with C-PE as a hepatoprotective and neuroprotective drug has ameliorated kidney, redox, hepatobiliary, and hepatocellular biomarkers against CCl4-induced toxicity in rats. It was determined that proteolytic enzymes might break down C-PE in the gastrointestinal system into bilirubin and low-molecular-weight proteins, mediating the pharmacological effects [79]. Furthermore, C-PE was shown to alleviate diabetes complications by lowering oxidative stress and oxidized, low-density, lipoprotein-induced atherogenesis in streptozotocin-induced type 2 diabetic mice. C-PE administration decreased organ weights, food consumption, cholesterol concentrations, and serum concentrations of glucose and raised body weight, bilirubin, total protein, and the ferric-reducing capacity of plasma values [80]. Also, hepatic and renal tissues showed substantial reductions in lipid hydroperoxide, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), and conjugated diene contents, with elevations in superoxide dismutase, catalase, and glutathione peroxidase, and reduced glutathione, vitamin C, and vitamin E levels [77][80]. Although C-PE administration has become widely used, the detailed mode of action of C-PE in many diseases remains unknown. Further study is needed to elucidate the action point of C-PE in different metabolic pathways.

4.2. PE in Cosmetics

C-PE has long been recognized as an excellent quencher of various oxygen derivatives. Due to this capability, phytopigment of Spirulina sp., such as C-PC, PCB, and PEB, are thought to be excellent antioxidant, anti-wrinkle, anti-melanogenic, and anti-aging agents, as well as natural, non-toxic colorants in eye shadows, eyeliners, and lipsticks [81][82][83]. The majority of the PE content in commercial cosmetics and skin care products is in the form of B-PE or R-PE; however, there is no data on PE derived from cyanobacteria [81][84][85]. For example, purified R-PE isolated from Colaconema formosanum demonstrates anti-aging and anti-allergic properties without toxicity on several mammalian cell lines and epidermal tissues, indicating that this compound has potential for cosmetics usage [84]. Various cyanobacteria strains are now commonly utilized in skin care products to treat various skin problems by functioning as anti-wrinkling agents, sunscreens, nourishing moisturizers, whitening agents, or texture enhancers [83][86]. Hence, it is envisaged that C-PE, which has a range of beneficial bioactivities, will be included in cosmetics or skincare products.

4.3. PE in Food and Feed Industries

By appealing to consumers’ growing health awareness, PE with natural colorant properties has become an alternative to the use of synthetic dye [2]. For example, the pink colorant exhibited by PE has been added as a dye into dairy products, such as milkshakes and yogurt, to make processed products more enticing and to provide color to otherwise colorless food [87]. Red phycoerythrin has a unique yellow fluorescence. Transparent lollipops prepared from sugar solution, soft drinks, dried sugar-drop sweets for cake decorating (that fluoresce under UV light), and fluorescent alcoholic beverages that exploit the benefits of these spectral properties are still being researched [88]. Another pivotal reason for using PE as a dye is that it has antioxidant properties that add value to processed food products. Phycoerythrin is famous as an antioxidant and anti-inflammatory drug, with features that are able to avert ROS-related abnormalities, protect against physiological changes caused by oxidative stress, and have anti-aging benefits [6][89]. This substance also has fewer side effects than synthetic additives or chemical drugs. However, C-PE uses in food products need to be explored further and corroborated through toxicity testing. Further, more study on the bioavailability and interaction of diets and C-PE is necessary [87].
Several studies have demonstrated the benefits of using PE as feed. For example, Lee et al. (2021) found that PE can variably increase the immunological response of whiteleg shrimp in vitro and in vivo and that it might be applied as an immunomodulator in shrimp production [90]. Dietary PE supplementation may also modify the gut microbiota to improve intestinal nutrition and disease resistance in animals by increasing the beneficial bacteria and reducing the prevalence of harmful bacteria within the intestine [91].

4.4. PE in Detection, Diagnosis, and Biotechnology

Compared to monomers, the high molar extinction coefficient of PE is ascribed to trimeric and hexameric packing, as well as the presence of open-chain tetrapyrrole chromophores covalently attached to them [2][90]. The unique fluorescent features of PE have broadened its applications as a fluorescent label in immunoassays, flow cytometry, cell biology, and fluorescence microscopy for biomedical research and diagnostics [92][93][94]. Furthermore, the staining of the PE-labelled monoclonal antibody probe was more clear and bright than the PC-labelled probe when detecting invasive amebiasis [95]. PE can also be employed as a marker in electrofocusing or gel electrophoresis [96] and as a photosensitizer in cancer therapy [97].

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/md21010028

References

  1. Hsieh-Lo, M.; Castillo, G.; Ochoa-Becerra, M.A.; Mojica, L. Phycocyanin and Phycoerythrin: Strategies to Improve Production Yield and Chemical Stability. Algal Res. 2019, 42, 101600.
  2. Sonani, R.R. Recent Advances in Production, Purification and Applications of Phycobiliproteins. World J. Biol. Chem. 2016, 7, 100.
  3. Venkata Mohan, S.; Rohit, M.V.; Chiranjeevi, P.; Chandra, R.; Navaneeth, B. Heterotrophic Microalgae Cultivation to Synergize Biodiesel Production with Waste Remediation: Progress and Perspectives. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 184, 169–178.
  4. Bachchhav, M.B.; Kulkarni, M.V.; Ingale, A.G. Enhanced Phycocyanin Production from Spirulina platensis Using Light Emitting Diode. J. Inst. Eng. Ser. E 2017, 98, 41–45.
  5. Vonshak, A.; Cheung, S.M.; Chen, F. Mixotrophic Growth Modifies the Response of Spirulina (Arthrospira) Platensis (Cyanobacteria) Cells to Light. J. Phycol. 2000, 36, 675–679.
  6. Pagels, F.; Guedes, A.C.; Amaro, H.M.; Kijjoa, A.; Vasconcelos, V. Phycobiliproteins from Cyanobacteria: Chemistry and Biotechnological Applications. Biotechnol. Adv. 2019, 37, 422–443.
  7. Rodríguez, H.; Rivas, J.; Guerrero, M.G.; Losada, M. Enhancement of Phycobiliprotein Production in Nitrogen-Fixing Cyanobacteria. J. Biotechnol. 1991, 20, 263–270.
  8. Stowe, W.C.; Brodie-Kommit, J.; Stowe-Evans, E. Characterization of Complementary Chromatic Adaptation in Gloeotrichia UTEX 583 and Identification of a Transposon-like Insertion in the CpeBA Operon. Plant Cell Physiol. 2011, 52, 553–562.
  9. Mishra, S.K.; Shrivastav, A.; Maurya, R.R.; Patidar, S.K.; Haldar, S.; Mishra, S. Effect of Light Quality on the C-Phycoerythrin Production in Marine Cyanobacteria Pseudanabaena sp. Isolated from Gujarat Coast, India. Protein Expr. Purif. 2012, 81, 5–10.
  10. Mullineaux, C.W.; Emlyn-Jones, D. State Transitions: An Example of Acclimation to Low-Light Stress. J. Exp. Bot. 2005, 56, 389–393.
  11. Khattar, J.I.S.; Kaur, S.; Kaushal, S.; Singh, Y.; Singh, D.P.; Rana, S.; Gulati, A. Hyperproduction of Phycobiliproteins by the Cyanobacterium Anabaena fertilissima PUPCCC 410.5 under Optimized Culture Conditions. Algal Res. 2015, 12, 463–469.
  12. Hemlata; Fatma, T. Screening of Cyanobacteria for Phycobiliproteins and Effect of Different Environmental Stress on Its Yield. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2009, 83, 509–515.
  13. Maurya, S.S.; Maurya, J.N.; Pandey, V.D. Factors Regulating Phycobiliprotein Production in Cyanobacteria. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2014, 3, 764–771.
  14. Ghosh, T.; Mishra, S. Studies on Extraction and Stability of C-Phycoerythrin From a Marine Cyanobacterium. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2020, 4, 1–12.
  15. Fujita, Y.; Hattori, A. Effect of Chromatic Lights on Phycobilin Formation in a Blue-Green Tolypothrix tenuis. Plant Cell Physiol. 1960, 1, 293–303.
  16. Blas-Valdivia, V.; Rojas-Franco, P.; Serrano-Contreras, J.I.; Sfriso, A.A.; Garcia-Hernandez, C.; Franco-Colín, M.; Cano-Europa, E. C-Phycoerythrin from Phormidium Persicinum Prevents Acute Kidney Injury by Attenuating Oxidative and Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 589.
  17. Johnson, E.M.; Kumar, K.; Das, D. Physicochemical Parameters Optimization, and Purification of Phycobiliproteins from the Isolated Nostoc sp. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 166, 541–547.
  18. Keithellakpam, O.S.; Nath, T.O.; Oinam, A.S.; Thingujam, I.; Oinam, G.; Dutt, S.G. Effect of External PH on Cyanobacterial Phycobiliproteins Production and Ammonium Excretion. J. Appl. Biol. Biotechnol. 2015, 3, 38–42.
  19. Sharma, G.; Kumar, M.; Ali, M.I.; Jasuja, N.D. Effect of Carbon Content, Salinity and PH on Spirulina platensis for Phycocyanin, Allophycocyanin and Phycoerythrin Accumulation. J. Microb. Biochem. Technol. 2014, 6, 202–206.
  20. Kaushal, S.; Singh, Y.; Khattar, J.I.S.; Singh, D.P. Phycobiliprotein Production by a Novel Cold Desert Cyanobacterium Nodularia sphaerocarpa PUPCCC 420.1. J. Appl. Phycol. 2017, 29, 1819–1827.
  21. Sudhir, P.R.; Pogoryelov, D.; Kovács, L.; Garab, G.; Murthy, S.D.S. The Effects of Salt Stress on Photosynthetic Electron Transport and Thylakoid Membrane Proteins in the Cyanobacterium Spirulina platensis. J. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2005, 38, 481–485.
  22. Vogt, J.C.; Abed, R.M.M.; Albach, D.C.; Palinska, K.A. Bacterial and Archaeal Diversity in Hypersaline Cyanobacterial Mats Along a Transect in the Intertidal Flats of the Sultanate of Oman. Microb. Ecol. 2018, 75, 331–347.
  23. Rafiqul, I.M.; Hassan, A.; Sulebele, G.; Orosco, C.A.; Roustaian, P.; Jalal, K.C.A. Salt Stress Culture of Blue-Green Algae Spirulina fusiformis. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2003, 6, 648–650.
  24. Pajot, A.; Huynh, G.H.; Picot, L.; Marchal, L.; Nicolau, E. Fucoxanthin from Algae to Human, an Extraordinary Bioresource: Insights and Advances in up and Downstream Processes. Mar. Drugs 2022, 20, 222.
  25. Fernández-Juárez, V.; Bennasar-Figueras, A.; Sureda-Gomila, A.; Ramis-Munar, G.; Agawin, N.S.R. Differential Effects of Varying Concentrations of Phosphorus, Iron, and Nitrogen in N2-Fixing Cyanobacteria. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 541558.
  26. Klotz, A.; Georg, J.; Bučinská, L.; Watanabe, S.; Reimann, V.; Januszewski, W.; Sobotka, R.; Jendrossek, D.; Hess, W.R.; Forchhammer, K. Awakening of a Dormant Cyanobacterium from Nitrogen Chlorosis Reveals a Genetically Determined Program. Curr. Biol. 2016, 26, 2862–2872.
  27. Khazi, M.I.; Demirel, Z.; Dalay, M.C. Evaluation of Growth and Phycobiliprotein Composition of Cyanobacteria Isolates Cultivated in Different Nitrogen Sources. J. Appl. Phycol. 2018, 30, 1513–1523.
  28. Maza, L.D.L.R.; Guevara, M.; Gómez, B.J.; Arredondo-Vega, B.; Cortez, R.; Licet, B. Production of Pigments from Arthrospira maxima Cultivated in Photobioreactors. Rev. Colomb. Biotecnol. 2017, 19, 108–114.
  29. Soltani, N.; Khavarinezhad, R.A.; Tabatabaei, Y.S.; Shokravi, S. Growth and Some Metabolic Features of Cyanobacterium Fischerella sp. FS18 in Different Combined Nitrogen. J. Sci. 2007, 18, 123–128.
  30. Liotenberg, S.; Campbell, D.; Rippka, R.; Houmard, J.; Tandeau De Marsac, N. Effect of the Nitrogen Source on Phycobiliprotein Synthesis and Cell Reserves in a Chromatically Adapting Filamentous Cyanobacterium. Microbiology 1996, 142, 611–622.
  31. Glazer, A.N. Phycobilisomes. In Methods in Enzymology; Academic Press: Cambridge, UK, 1988; Volume 167, pp. 304–312.
  32. Ting, C.S.; Rocap, G.; King, J.; Chisholm, S.W. Cyanobacterial Photosynthesis in the Oceans: The Origins and Significance of Divergent Light-Harvesting Strategies. Trends Microbiol. 2002, 10, 134–142.
  33. Simeunović, J.; Bešlin, K.; Svirčev, Z.; Kovač, D.; Babić, O. Impact of Nitrogen and Drought on Phycobiliprotein Content in Terrestrial Cyanobacterial Strains. J. Appl. Phycol. 2013, 25, 597–607.
  34. Zehr, J.P. Nitrogen Fixation by Marine Cyanobacteria. Trends Microbiol. 2011, 19, 162–173.
  35. Sohm, J.A.; Webb, E.A.; Capone, D.G. Emerging Patterns of Marine Nitrogen Fixation. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2011, 9, 499–508.
  36. Geider, R.J.; La Roche, J. Redfield Revisited: Variability of C:N:P in Marine Microalgae and Its Biochemical Basis. Eur. J. Phycol. 2002, 37, 1–17.
  37. Zuorro, A.; Leal-Jerez, A.G.; Morales-Rivas, L.K.; Mogollón-Londoño, S.O.; Sanchez-Galvis, E.M.; García-Martínez, J.B.; Barajas-Solano, A.F. Enhancement of Phycobiliprotein Accumulation in Thermotolerant Oscillatoria sp. Through Media Optimization. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 10527–10536.
  38. Peng, G.; Wilhelm, S.W.; Lin, S.; Wang, X. Response of Microcystis Aeruginosa FACHB-905 to Different Nutrient Ratios and Changes in Phosphorus Chemistry. J. Oceanol. Limnol. 2018, 36, 1040–1052.
  39. Guildford, S.J.; Hecky, R.E. Total Nitrogen, Total Phosphorus, and Nutrient Limitation in Lakes and Oceans: Is There a Common Relationship? Limnol. Oceanogr. 2000, 45, 1213–1223.
  40. Sañudo-Wilhelmy, S.A.; Kustka, A.B.; Gobler, C.J.; Hutchins, D.A.; Yang, M.; Lwiza, K.; Burns, J.; Capone, D.G.; Raven, J.A.; Carpenter, E.J. Phosphorus Limitation of Nitrogen Fixation by Trichodesmium in the Central Atlantic Ocean. Nature 2001, 411, 66–69.
  41. Adhikary, S.P.; Pattnaik, H. Growth Response of Westiellopsis prolifica Janet to Organic Substrates in Light and Dark. Hydrobiologia 1979, 67, 241–247.
  42. Prasanna, R.; Pabby, A.; Singh, P.K. Effect of Glucose and Light-Dark Environment on Pigmentation Profiles in the Cyanobacterium Calothrix elenkenii. Folia Microbiol. 2004, 49, 26–30.
  43. Haddad, M.F.; Dayioglu, T.; Yaman, M.; Nalbantoglu, B.; Cakmak, T. Long-Term Diazotrophic Cultivation of Trichormus sp. IMU26: Evaluation of Physiological Changes Related to Elevated Phycobiliprotein Content. J. Appl. Phycol. 2020, 32, 881–888.
  44. Venugopal, V.; Prasanna, R.; Sood, A.; Jaiswal, P.; Kaushik, B.D. Stimulation of Pigment Accumulation in Anabaena Azollae Strains: Effect of Light Intensity and Sugars. Folia Microbiol. 2006, 51, 50–56.
  45. Borsari, R.R.J.; Morioka, L.R.I.; Ribeiro, M.L.L.; Buzato, J.B.; Pinotti, M.H.P. Mixotrophic Growth of Nostoc sp. on Glucose, Sucrose and Sugarcane Molasses for Phycobiliprotein Production. Acta Sci.-Biol. Sci. 2007, 29, 9–13.
  46. Kovač, D.; Babić, O.; Milovanović, I.; Mišan, A.; Simeunović, J. The Production of Biomass and Phycobiliprotein Pigments in Filamentous Cyanobacteria: The Impact of Light and Carbon Sources. Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 2017, 53, 539–545.
  47. Lebedeva, N.V.; Boichenko, V.A.; Semenova, L.R.; Pronina, N.A.; Stadnichuk, I.N. Effects of Glucose during Photoheterotrophic Growth of the Cyanobacterium Calothrix sp. PCC 7601 Capable for Chromatic Adaptation. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2005, 52, 235–241.
  48. Rivera Gonzalez, M.V.; Gómez Gómez, L.; Cubillos Hinojosa, J.G.; Peralta Castilla, A. Effect of Coal Type Lignite on Growth and Production of Pigments of Arthrospira platensis. Rev. Colomb. Biotecnol. 2016, 18, 73–80.
  49. Denis, C.; Ledorze, C.; Jaouen, P.; Fleurence, J. Comparison of Different Procedures for the Extraction and Partial Purification of R-Phycoerythrin from the Red Macroalga Grateloupia turuturu. Bot. Mar. 2009, 52, 278–281.
  50. Ardiles, P.; Cerezal-Mezquita, P.; Salinas-Fuentes, F.; Órdenes, D.; Renato, G.; Ruiz-Domínguez, M.C. Biochemical Composition and Phycoerythrin Extraction from Red Microalgae: A Comparative Study Using Green Extraction Technologies. Processes 2020, 8, 1628.
  51. Parmar, A.; Singh, N.K.; Kaushal, A.; Sonawala, S.; Madamwar, D. Purification, Characterization and Comparison of Phycoerythrins from Three Different Marine Cyanobacterial Cultures. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 1795–1802.
  52. Sonani, R.R.; Singh, N.K.; Kumar, J.; Thakar, D.; Madamwar, D. Concurrent Purification and Antioxidant Activity of Phycobiliproteins from Lyngbya sp. A09DM: An Antioxidant and Anti-Aging Potential of Phycoerythrin in Caenorhabditis elegans. Process Biochem. 2014, 49, 1757–1766.
  53. Kamble, S.P.; Vikhe, G.P.; Chamle, D.R. Extraction and Purification of Phycoerythrin-A Natural Colouring Agent from Spirulina platensis. J. Pharm. Chem. Biol. Sci. 2018, 6, 78–84.
  54. Zavřel, T.; Chmelík, D.; Sinetova, M.A.; Červený, J. Spectrophotometric Determination of Phycobiliprotein Content in Cyanobacterium Synechocystis. J. Vis. Exp. 2018, 139, 1–9.
  55. Julianti, E.; Susanti; Singgih, M.; Neti Mulyani, L. Optimization of Extraction Method and Characterization of Phycocyanin Pigment from Spirulina platensis. J. Math. Fundam. Sci. 2019, 51, 168–176.
  56. Tan, H.T.; Khong, N.M.H.; Khaw, Y.S.; Ahmad, S.A.; Yuso, F.M. Optimization of the Freezing-Thawing Method for Extracting Phycobiliproteins from Arthrospira sp. Molecules 2020, 25, 3894.
  57. Arakawa, T.; Timasheff, S.N. The Stabilization of Proteins by Osmolytes. Biophys. J. 1985, 47, 411–414.
  58. Pan-utai, W.; Iamtham, S. Physical Extraction and Extrusion Entrapment of C-Phycocyanin from Arthrospira platensis. J. King Saud Univ.-Sci. 2019, 31, 1535–1542.
  59. Dumay, J.; Clément, N.; Morançais, M.; Fleurence, J. Optimization of Hydrolysis Conditions of Palmaria palmata to Enhance R-Phycoerythrin Extraction. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 131, 21–27.
  60. Mishra, S.K.; Shrivastav, A.; Mishra, S. Preparation of Highly Purified C-Phycoerythrin from Marine Cyanobacterium Pseudanabaena sp. Protein Expr. Purif. 2011, 80, 234–238.
  61. Mercier, L.; Peltomaa, E.; Ojala, A. Comparative Analysis of Phycoerythrin Production in Cryptophytes. J. Appl. Phycol. 2022, 34, 789–797.
  62. Patel, A.; Mishra, S.; Pawar, R.; Ghosh, P.K. Purification and Characterization of C-Phycocyanin from Cyanobacterial Species of Marine and Freshwater Habitat. Protein Expr. Purif. 2005, 40, 248–255.
  63. Rito-Palomares, M.; Nuez, L.; Amador, D. Practical Application of Aqueous Two-Phase Systems for the Development of a Prototype Process for c-Phycocyanin Recovery from Spirulina maxima. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2001, 76, 1273–1280.
  64. Kannaujiya, V.K.; Sinha, R.P. Thermokinetic Stability of Phycocyanin and Phycoerythrin in Food-Grade Preservatives. J. Appl. Phycol. 2016, 28, 1063–1070.
  65. Chaiklahan, R.; Chirasuwan, N.; Bunnag, B. Stability of Phycocyanin Extracted from Spirulina sp.: Influence of Temperature, PH and Preservatives. Process Biochem. 2012, 47, 659–664.
  66. Mishra, S.K.; Shrivastav, A.; Pancha, I.; Jain, D.; Mishra, S. Effect of Preservatives for Food Grade C-Phycoerythrin, Isolated from Marine Cyanobacteria Pseudanabaena sp. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2010, 47, 597–602.
  67. Munier, M.; Jubeau, S.; Wijaya, A.; Morançais, M.; Dumay, J.; Marchal, L.; Jaouen, P.; Fleurence, J. Physicochemical Factors Affecting the Stability of Two Pigments: R-Phycoerythrin of Grateloupia turuturu and B-Phycoerythrin of Porphyridium cruentum. Food Chem. 2014, 150, 400–407.
  68. Bekasova, O.D.; Borzova, V.A.; Shubin, V.V.; Kovalyov, L.I.; Stein-Margolina, V.A.; Kurganov, B.I. An Increase in the Resistance of R-Phycoerythrin to Thermal Aggregation by Silver Nanoparticles Synthesized in Nanochannels of the Pigment. Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 2016, 52, 98–104.
  69. Martelli, G.; Folli, C.; Visai, L.; Daglia, M.; Ferrari, D. Thermal Stability Improvement of Blue Colorant C-Phycocyanin from Spirulina platensis for Food Industry Applications. Process Biochem. 2014, 49, 154–159.
  70. Selig, M.J.; Malchione, N.M.; Gamaleldin, S.; Padilla-Zakour, O.I.; Abbaspourrad, A. Protection of Blue Color in a Spirulina Derived Phycocyanin Extract from Proteolytic and Thermal Degradation via Complexation with Beet-Pectin. Food Hydrocoll. 2018, 74, 46–52.
  71. Yan, M.; Liu, B.; Jiao, X.; Qin, S. Preparation of Phycocyanin Microcapsules and Its Properties. Food Bioprod. Process. 2014, 92, 89–97.
  72. Purnamayati, L.; Dewi, E.; Kurniasih, R.A. Phycocyanin Stability in Microcapsules Processed by Spray Drying Method Using Different Inlet Temperature. In Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 3rd International Conference on Tropical and Coastal Region Eco Development 2017, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 2–4 October 2017; p. 012076.
  73. Hirata, T.; Tanaka, M.; Ooike, M.; Tsunomura, T.; Sakaguchi, M. Antioxidant Activities of Phycocyanobilin Prepared from Spirulina platensis. J. Appl. Phycol. 2000, 12, 435–439.
  74. Sonani, R.R. Antioxidant Potential of Phycobiliproteins: Role in Anti-Aging Research. Biochem. Anal. Biochem. 2015, 4, 2161-1009.
  75. Pendyala, B.; Patras, A.; Dash, C. Phycobilins as Potent Food Bioactive Broad-Spectrum Inhibitors Against Proteases of SARS-CoV-2 and Other Coronaviruses: A Preliminary Study. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 645713.
  76. Jiang, L.; Wang, Y.; Liu, G.; Liu, H.; Zhu, F.; Ji, H.; Li, B. C-Phycocyanin Exerts Anti-Cancer Effects via the MAPK Signaling Pathway in MDA-MB-231 Cells. Cancer Cell Int. 2018, 18, 12.
  77. Chen, H.; Qi, H.; Xiong, P. Phycobiliproteins—A Family of Algae-Derived Biliproteins: Productions, Characterization and Pharmaceutical Potentials. Mar. Drugs 2022, 20, 450.
  78. Bei, H.; Guang-Ce, W.; Chen-Kui, Z.; Zhen-Gang, L. The Experimental Research of R-Phycoerythrin Subunits on Cancer Treatment: A New Photosensitizer in PDT. Cancer Biother. Radiopharm. 2002, 17, 35–42.
  79. Soni, B.; Visavadiya, N.P.; Madamwar, D. Ameliorative Action of Cyanobacterial Phycoerythrin on CCl4-Induced Toxicity in Rats. Toxicology 2008, 248, 59–65.
  80. Soni, B.; Visavadiya, N.P.; Madamwar, D. Attenuation of Diabetic Complications by C-Phycoerythrin in Rats: Antioxidant Activity of C-Phycoerythrin Including Copper-Induced Lipoprotein and Serum Oxidation. Br. J. Nutr. 2009, 102, 102–109.
  81. Román, R.B.; Alvárez-Pez, J.M.; Fernández, F.G.A.; Grima, E.M. Recovery of Pure B-Phycoerythrin from the Microalga Porphyridium cruentum. J. Biotechnol. 2002, 93, 73–85.
  82. Sathasivam, R.; Radhakrishnan, R.; Hashem, A.; Abd_Allah, E.F. Microalgae Metabolites: A Rich Source for Food and Medicine. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2019, 26, 709–722.
  83. Nowruzi, B.; Sarvari, G.; Blanco, S. The Cosmetic Application of Cyanobacterial Secondary Metabolites. Algal Res. 2020, 49, 101959.
  84. Lee, P.T.; Yeh, H.Y.; Lung, W.Q.C.; Huang, J.; Chen, Y.J.; Chen, B.; Nan, F.H.; Lee, M.C. R-Phycoerythrin from Colaconema formosanum (Rhodophyta), an Anti-Allergic and Collagen Promoting Material for Cosmeceuticals. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 9425.
  85. D’Agnolo, E.; Rizzo, R.; Paoletti, S.; Murano, E. R-Phycoerythrin from the Red Alga Gracilaria longa. Phytochemistry 1994, 35, 693–696.
  86. Vaibhav, V.; Sahastrabuddhe, S. ‘BLUE’ Is the New ‘GREEN’ for Cosmetic Industry. Int. J. Res. Trends Innov. 2018, 3, 134–144.
  87. García, A.B.; Longo, E.; Murillo, M.C.; Bermejo, R. Using a B-Phycoerythrin Extract as a Natural Colorant: Application in Milk-Based Products. Molecules 2021, 26, 297.
  88. Dufossé, L.; Galaup, P.; Yaron, A.; Arad, S.M.; Blanc, P.; Murthy, K.N.C.; Ravishankar, G.A. Microorganisms and Microalgae as Sources of Pigments for Food Use: A Scientific Oddity or an Industrial Reality? Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2005, 16, 389–406.
  89. Patel, S.N.; Sonani, R.R.; Jakharia, K.; Bhastana, B.; Patel, H.M.; Chaubey, M.G.; Singh, N.K.; Madamwar, D. Antioxidant Activity and Associated Structural Attributes of Halomicronema Phycoerythrin. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 111, 359–369.
  90. Liu, L.-N.; Su, H.-N.; Yan, S.-G.; Shao, S.-M.; Xie, B.-B.; Chen, X.-L.; Zhang, X.-Y.; Zhou, B.-C.; Zhang, Y.-Z. Probing the PH Sensitivity of R-Phycoerythrin: Investigations of Active Conformational and Functional Variation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Bioenerg. 2009, 1787, 939–946.
  91. Qi, H.; Liu, Y.; Qi, X.; Liang, H.; Chen, H.; Jiang, P.; Wang, D. Dietary Recombinant Phycoerythrin Modulates the Gut Microbiota of H22 Tumor-Bearing Mice. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 665.
  92. Glazer, A.N. Phycobiliproteins—A Family of Valuable, Widely Used Fluorophores. J. Appl. Phycol. 1994, 6, 105–112.
  93. Bailey, M.P.; Rocks, B.F.; Riley, C. On the Use of Fluorescent Labels in Immunoassay. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 1987, 5, 649–658.
  94. Wilson, M.R.; Crowley, S.; Odgers, G.A.; Shaw, L. Immunofluorescent Labeling Using Covalently Linked Anti-phycoerythrin Antibodies and Phycoerythrin Polymers. Cytometry 1991, 12, 373–377.
  95. Intrarapuk, A.; Awakairt, S.; Thammapalerd, N.; Mahannop, P.; Pattanawong, U.; Suppasiri, T. Comparison between R-Phycocyanin-Labeled and R-Phycoerythrin-Labeled Monoclonal Antibody (MAb) Probes for the Detection of Entamoeba histolytica Trophozoites. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health 2001, 32, 165–171.
  96. Aráoz, R.; Lebert, M.; Häder, D.P. Electrophoretic Applications of Phycobiliproteins. Electrophoresis 1998, 19, 215–219.
  97. Li, S.; Ji, L.; Shi, Q.; Wu, H.; Fan, J. Advances in the Production of Bioactive Substances from Marine Unicellular Microalgae Porphyridium spp. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 292, 122048.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!
ScholarVision Creations
Feedback