Solar Storm of August 1972: History
View Latest Version
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Contributor:
HandWiki

The solar storms of August 1972 were a historically powerful series of solar storms with intense to extreme solar flare, solar particle event, and geomagnetic storm components in early August 1972, during solar cycle 20. The storm caused widespread electric‐ and communication‐grid disturbances through large portions of North America as well as satellite disruptions. On August 4, 1972, the storm caused the accidental detonation of numerous U.S. naval mines near Haiphong, North Vietnam. The coronal cloud's transit time from the Sun to the Earth is the fastest ever recorded.

  • solar cycle
  • solar storms
  • geomagnetic storm

1. Solar-Terrestrial Characteristics

1.1. Sunspot Region

The most significant detected solar flare activity occurred from August 2 to August 11. Most of the significant solar activity emanated from active sunspot region McMath 11976 (MR 11976; active regions being clusters of sunspot pairs).[1][2][3][4] McMath 11976 was extraordinarily magnetically complex. Its size was large although not exceptionally so.[5] McMath 11976 produced 67 solar flares (4 of these X-class) during the time it was facing Earth, from July 29 to August 11.[6] It also produced multiple relatively rare white light flares over multiple days.[7] The same active area was long-lived. It persisted through five solar rotation cycles, first receiving the designation as Region 11947 as it faced Earth, going unseen as it rotated the far side of the Sun, then returning Earthside as Region 11976, before cycling as Regions 12007, 12045, and 12088, respectively.[8]

1.2. Flare of August 4

Electromagnetic effects

The August 4 flare which triggered the extreme solar particle event (SPE) around and intense geomagnetic storm on Earth was among the largest documented by science.[9] This flare saturated the Solrad 9 X-ray sensor at approximately X5.3 but was estimated to be in the vicinity of X20,[10] the threshold of the very rarely reached R5 on the NOAA radio blackout space weather scale.[11] A radio burst of 76,000 sfu was measured at 1 GHz.[6] This was an exceptionally long duration flare, generating X-ray emissions above background level for more than 16 hours. Rare emissions in the gamma ray ([math]\displaystyle{ \gamma }[/math]-ray) spectrum were detected for the first time, on both August 4 and August 7, by the Orbiting Solar Observatory (OSO 7).[12] The broad spectrum electromagnetic emissions of the largest flare are estimated to total 1-5 x 1032 ergs in energy released.[13]

CMEs/coronal clouds

The arrival time of the associated coronal mass ejection (CME) and its coronal cloud, 14.6 hours, remains the record shortest duration as of November 2018, indicating an exceptionally fast and typically geoeffective event (normal transit time is two to three days). A preceding series of solar flares and CMEs cleared the interplanetary medium of particles, enabling the rapid arrival in a process similar to the solar storm of 2012.[14] Normalizing the transit times of other known extreme events to a standard 1 AU to account for the varying distance of the Earth from the Sun throughout the year, one study found the ultrafast August 4 flare to be an outlier to all other events, even compared to the great solar storm of 1859, the overall most extreme known solar storm which is also known as the "Carrington event".[15] This corresponds to an ejecta speed of an estimated 2,850 km/s (1,770 mi/s).[16]

The near Earth vicinity solar wind velocity may also be record-breaking and is calculated to have exceeded 2,000 km/s (1,200 mi/s). The velocity was not directly measurable as instrumentation was off-scale high.[17][18] Analysis of a Guam magnetogram indicated a shockwave traversing the magnetosphere at 3,080 km/s (1,910 mi/s) and astonishing sudden storm commencement (SSC) time of 62 s.[19] Estimated magnetic field strength of 73-103 nT and electric field strength of >200 mV/m was calculated at 1 AU.[20]

Solar particle event

Reanalysis based on IMP-5 (a.k.a. Explorer 41) space solar observatory data suggests that >10‐MeV ion flux reached 70,000 cm−2 s−1 sr−1 bringing it near the exceedingly rarely reached NOAA S5 level on the solar radiation scale.[11] Fluxes at other energy levels, from soft to hard, at >1 MeV, >30 MeV, and >60 MeV, also reached extreme levels, as well as inferred for >100 MeV.[7][21] The particle storm led to northern hemisphere polar stratospheric ozone depletion of about 46% at 50 km (31 mi) altitude for several days before the atmosphere recovered and which persisted for 53 days at the lower altitude of 39 km (24 mi).[22]

The intense solar wind and particle storm associated with the CMEs led to one of the largest decreases in cosmic ray radiation from outside the Solar System, known as a Forbush decrease, ever observed.[23] Solar energetic particle (SEP) onslaught was so strong that the Forbush decrease in fact partially abated.[24] SEPs reached the Earth's surface, causing a ground level event (GLE).[25]

Geomagnetic storm

The August 4 flare and ejecta caused significant to extreme effects on the Earth's magnetosphere, which responded in an unusually complex manner.[7] The disturbance storm time index (Dst) was only -125 nT, falling merely within the relatively common "intense" storm category. Initially an exceptional geomagnetic response occurred and some extreme storming occurred locally later (some of these possibly within substorms), but arrival of subsequent CMEs with northward oriented magnetic fields is thought to have shifted the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) from an initial southward to northward orientation, thus substantially suppressing geomagnetic activity as the solar blast was largely deflected away from rather toward Earth. An early study found an extraordinary asymmetry range of ≈450 nT.[26] A 2006 study found that if a favorable IMF southward orientation were present that the Dst may have surpassed 1,600 nT, comparable to the 1859 Carrington event.[27]

Magnetometers in Boulder, Colorado, Honolulu, Hawaii,[28] and elsewhere went off-scale high. Stations in India recorded geomagnetic sudden impulses (GSIs) of 301-486 nT.[29] Estimated AE index peaked at over 3,000 nT and Kp reached 9 at several hourly intervals[30] (corresponding to NOAA G5 level).[11]

The magnetosphere compressed rapidly and substantially with the magnetopause reduced to 4-5 RE and the plasmapause (boundary of the plasmasphere, or lower magnetosphere) reduced to 2 RE or less. This is a contraction of at least one half and up to two-thirds the size of the magnetosphere under normal conditions, to a distance of less than 20,000 km (12,000 mi).[31] Solar wind dynamic pressure increased to about 100 times normal, based upon data from Prognoz 1.[32]

2. Impacts

2.1. Spacecraft

Astronomers first reported unusual flares on August 2, later corroborated by orbiting spacecraft. On August 3, Pioneer 9 detected a shock wave and sudden increase in solar wind speed[33] from approximately 217–363 mi/s (349–584 km/s).[34] A shockwave passed Pioneer 10, which was 2.2 AU from the Sun at the time.[2] The greatly constricted magnetosphere caused many satellites to cross outside Earth's protective magnetic field, such boundary crossings into the magnetosheath led to erratic space weather conditions and potentially destructive solar particle bombardment.[35] The Intelsat IV F-2 communications satellite solar panel arrays power generation was degraded by 5%, about 2 years worth of wear.[36] An on-orbit power failure ended the mission of a Defense Satellite Communications System (DSCS II) satellite.[37] Disruptions of Defense Meteorological Satellite Program (DMSP) scanner electronics caused anomalous dots of light in the southern polar cap imagery.[7]

2.2. Terrestrial Effects and Aurora

On August 4, an aurora shone so luminously that shadows were cast on the southern coast of the United Kingdom [7] and shortly later as far south as Bilbao, Spain at magnetic latitude 46°.[38] Extending to August 5, intense geomagnetic storming continued with bright red (a relatively rare color associated with extreme events) and fast-moving aurora visible at midday from dark regions of the Southern Hemisphere.[39]

Radio frequency (RF) effects were rapid and intense. Blackouts commenced nearly instantaneously on the sunlit side of Earth on HF and other vulnerable bands. A nighttime mid-latitude E layer developed.[40]

Geomagnetically induced currents (GICs) were generated and produced significant electrical grid disturbances throughout Canada and across much of eastern and central United States, with strong anomalies reported as far south as Maryland and Ohio, moderate anomalies in Tennessee , and weak anomalies in Alabama and north Texas . The voltage collapse of 64% on the North Dakota to Manitoba interconnection would have been sufficient to cause a system breakup if occurring during high export conditions on the line, which would have precipitated a large power outage. Many U.S. utilities in these regions reported no disturbances, with presence of igneous rock geology a suspected factor, as well as geomagnetic latitude and differences in operational characteristics of respective electrical grids.[41] Manitoba Hydro reported that power going the other way, from Manitoba to the U.S., plummeted 120 MW within a few minutes. Protective relays were repeatedly activated in Newfoundland.[7]

An outage was reported along American Telephone and Telegraph (now AT&T)'s L4 coaxial cable between Illinois and Iowa. Magnetic field variations (dB/dt) of ≈800 nT/min were estimated locally at the time[31] and the peak rate of change of magnetic field intensity reached >2,200 nT/min in central and western Canada, although the outage was most likely caused by swift intensification of the eastward electrojet of the ionosphere.[42] AT&T also experienced a surge of 60 volts on their telephone cable between Chicago and Nebraska.[34] Exceeding the high-current shutdown threshold, an induced electric field was measured at 7.0 V/km. The storm was detected in low-latitude areas such as the Philippines and Brazil, as well as Japan.[7]

2.3. Military Operations

American naval mine (left) explodes in Haiphong during U.S. Navy minesweeping (March 1973). https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?curid=1252480

The United States Air Force 's Vela nuclear detonation detection satellites mistook that an explosion occurred, but this was quickly dealt with by personnel monitoring the data in real-time.[7]

The U.S. Navy concluded, as shown in declassified documents,[43] that the seemingly spontaneous detonation of dozens of Destructor magnetic-influence sea mines (DSTs) within about 30 seconds in the Hon La area (magnetic latitude ≈9°) was highly likely the result of an intense solar storm. One account claims that 4,000 mines were detonated.[44] It was known that solar storms caused terrestrial geomagnetic disturbances but it was as yet unknown to the military whether these effects could be sufficiently intense. It was confirmed as possible in a meeting of Navy investigators at the NOAA Space Environment Center (SEC)[14] as well as by other facilities and experts.[7]

2.4. Human Spaceflight

Although it occurred between Apollo missions, the storm has long been chronicled within NASA. Apollo 16 had returned to Earth in April, and the final Apollo mission was a Moon landing planned for the following December.

Had such a mission been taking place, those inside an Apollo command module would be shielded from 90% of incoming radiation. This reduced dose could still have caused radiation sickness if the astronauts were located outside the protective magnetic field of Earth, which was the case for much of a lunar mission. An astronaut on EVA in orbit or on a moonwalk could have faced severe acute illness and potentially a near-universally fatal dose. Regardless of location, an astronaut would have an enhanced risk of contracting cancer after being exposed to this radiation.

This is one of only a handful of solar storms occurring in the Space Age that could cause severe illness, and was the most hazardous thus far.[45] Had the most intense solar activity of early August occurred during a mission it would have forced contingency measures up to an emergency return landing for medical treatment.[46]

3. Implications for Heliophysics and Society

The storm was an important event in the field of heliophysics, the study of space weather, with numerous studies published in the next few years and throughout the 1970s and 1980s, as well as leading to several influential internal investigations and to significant policy changes. Almost fifty years after the fact, the storm was reexamined in an October 2018 article published in the American Geophysical Union (AGU) journal Space Weather. The initial and early studies as well as the later reanalysis studies were only possible due to initial monitoring facilities installed during the International Geophysical Year (IGY) in 1957-1958 and subsequent global scientific cooperation to maintain the data sets. That initial terrestrial data from ground stations and balloons was later combined with spaceborne observatories to form far more complete information than had been previously possible, with this storm being one of the first widely documented of the then young Space Age. It convinced both the military and NASA to take space weather seriously and accordingly devote resources to its monitoring and study.[7]

The authors of the 2018 paper compared the 1972 storm to the great storm of 1859 in some aspects of intensity. They posit that it was a Carrington‐class storm.[7] Other researchers conclude that the 1972 event could have been comparable to 1859 for geomagnetic storming if magnetic field orientation parameters were favorable,[20][47] or as a "failed Carrington-type storm" based on related considerations,[48] which is also the finding of a 2013 Royal Academy of Engineering report.[49]

The content is sourced from: https://handwiki.org/wiki/Astronomy:Solar_storm_of_August_1972

References

  1. Hakura, Yukio (1976). "Interdisciplinary summary of solar/interplanetary events during August 1972". Space Sci. Rev. 19 (4–5): 411–457. doi:10.1007/BF00210637.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1007%2FBF00210637
  2. Smith, Edward J. (1976). "The August 1972 solar-terrestrial events: interplanetary magnetic field observations". Space Sci. Rev. 19 (4–5): 661–686. doi:10.1007/BF00210645.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1007%2FBF00210645
  3. Tanaka, K.; Y. Nakagawa (1973). "Force-free magnetic fields and flares of August 1972". Sol. Phys. 33 (1): 187–204. doi:10.1007/BF00152390.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1007%2FBF00152390
  4. Yang, Hai-Shou; H-M Chang; J. W. Harvey (1983). "Theory of quadrupolar sunspots and the active region of August, 1972". Sol. Phys. 84 (1–2): 139–151. doi:10.1007/BF00157453.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1007%2FBF00157453
  5. Dodson, H. W.; E. R. Hedeman (1973). "Evaluation of the August 1972 region as a solar activity center of activity (McMath Plage 11976)". in Coffey, H. E.. Collected Data Reports on August 1972 Solar‐Terrestrial Events. Report UAG‐28. 1. Boulder, CO: NOAA. pp. 16–22. 
  6. Bhonsle, R. V.; S. S. Degaonkar; S. K. Alurkar (1976). "Ground-based solar radio observations of the August 1972 events". Space Sci. Rev. 19 (4–5): 475=510. doi:10.1007/BF00210639.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1007%2FBF00210639
  7. Knipp, Delores J.; B. J. Fraser; M. A. Shea; D. F. Smart (2018). "On the Little‐Known Consequences of the 4 August 1972 Ultra‐Fast Coronal Mass Ejecta: Facts, Commentary and Call to Action". Space Weather 16 (11): 1635–1643. doi:10.1029/2018SW002024.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1029%2F2018SW002024
  8. "SGD Table: 1972". National Centers for Environmental Information. https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/stp/solar/sunspotregionsdata.html. 
  9. Zirin, Harold; K. Tanaka (1973). "The flares of August 1972". Sol. Phys. 32 (1): 173–207. doi:10.1007/BF00152736.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1007%2FBF00152736
  10. Ohshio, M. (1974). "Solar‐terrestrial disturbances of August 1972. Solar x‐ray flares and their corresponding sudden ionospheric disturbances" (in ja). Journal of the Radio Research Laboratories (Koganei, Tokyo) 21 (106): 311–340. 
  11. "NOAA Space Weather Scales". NOAA. April 7, 2011. https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/sites/default/files/images/NOAAscales.pdf. Retrieved November 30, 2018. 
  12. Chupp, E. L.; Forrest, D. J.; Higbie, P. R.; Suri, A. N.; Tsai, C.; Dunphy, P. P. (1973). "Solar Gamma Ray Lines observed during the Solar Activity of August 2 to August 11, 1972". Nature 241 (5388): 333–335. doi:10.1038/241333a0.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1038%2F241333a0
  13. Lin, R. P.; H. S. Hudson (1976). "Non-thermal processes in large solar flares". Solar Physics 50 (1): 153–178. doi:10.1007/BF00206199.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1007%2FBF00206199
  14. Carter, Brett (November 7, 2018). "Blasts from the Past: How massive solar eruptions 'probably' detonated dozens of US sea mines". The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/blasts-from-the-past-how-massive-solar-eruptions-probably-detonated-dozens-of-us-sea-mines-105983. 
  15. Freed, A. J.; C. T. Russell (2014). "Travel time classification of extreme solar events: Two families and an outlier". Geophys. Res. Lett. 41 (19): 6590–6594. doi:10.1002/2014GL061353.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2F2014GL061353
  16. Vaisberg, O. L.; G. N. Zastenker (1976). "Solar wind and magnetosheath observations at Earth during August 1972". Space Sci. Rev. 19 (4–5): 687–702. doi:10.1007/BF00210646.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1007%2FBF00210646
  17. Cliver, E. W.; J. Faynman; H. B. Garrett (1990). "An Estimate of the Maximum Speed of the Solar Wind, 1938-1989". J. Geophys. Res. 95 (A10): 17103–17112. doi:10.1029/JA095iA10p17103.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1029%2FJA095iA10p17103
  18. Cliver, E. W.; J. Faynman; H. B. Garrett (1990). "Flare-associated solar wind disturbances with short (<20 hr) transit times to Earth". Boulder, Colorado: NOAA Environ. Res. Lab.. pp. 348–358. 
  19. Araki, T.; T. Takeuchi; Y. Araki (2004). "Rise time of geomagnetic sudden commencements —Statistical analysis of ground geomagnetic data—". Earth Planets Space 56 (2): 289–293. doi:10.1186/BF03353411.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1186%2FBF03353411
  20. Tsurutani, B. T.; W. D. Gonzalez; G. S. Lakhina; S. Alex (2003). "The extreme magnetic storm of 1–2 September 1859". J. Geophys. Res. 108 (A7). doi:10.1029/2002JA009504. https://zenodo.org/record/1000695. 
  21. Jiggens, Peter; Marc-Andre Chavy-Macdonald; Giovanni Santin; Alessandra Menicucci; Hugh Evans; Alain Hilgers (2014). "The magnitude and effects of extreme solar particle events". J. Space Weather Space Clim. 4: A20. doi:10.1051/swsc/2014017.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1051%2Fswsc%2F2014017
  22. Reagan, J. B.; R. E. Meyerott; R. W. Nightingale; R. C. Gunton; R. G. Johnson; J. E. Evans; W. L. Imhof; D. F. Heath et al. (1981). "Effects of the August 1972 solar particle events on stratospheric ozone". J. Geophys. Res. 86 (A3): 1473–1494. doi:10.1029/JA086iA03p01473.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1029%2FJA086iA03p01473
  23. Levy, E. H.; S. P. Duggal; M. A. Pomerantz (1976). "Adiabatic Fermi acceleration of energetic particles between converging interplanetary shock waves". J. Geophys. Res. 81 (1): 51–59. doi:10.1029/JA081i001p00051.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1029%2FJA081i001p00051
  24. Pomerantz, M. A.; S. P. Duggal (1973). "Record-breaking Cosmic Ray Storm stemming from Solar Activity in August 1972". Nature 241 (5388): 331–333. doi:10.1038/241331a0.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1038%2F241331a0
  25. Kodama, M.; K. Murakami; M. Wada (1973). "Cosmic ray variations in August 1972". pp. 1680–1684. 
  26. Kawasaki, K.; Y. Kamide; F. Yasuhara; S.‐I Akasofu (1973). "Geomagnetic disturbances of August 4–9, 1972". in Coffey, H. E.. Collected Data Reports on August 1972 Solar‐Terrestrial Events. Report UAG‐28. 3. Boulder CO: NOAA. pp. 702–707. 
  27. Li, Xinlin; M. Temerin; B.T. Tsurutani; S. Alex (2006). "Modeling of 1–2 September 1859 super magnetic storm". Adv. Space Res. 38 (2): 273–279. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2005.06.070.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.asr.2005.06.070
  28. Matsushita, S. (1976). "Ionospheric and thermospheric responses during August 1972 storms — A review". Space Sci. Rev. 19 (4–5): 713–737. doi:10.1007/BF00210648.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1007%2FBF00210648
  29. Bhargava, B. N. (1973). "Low latitude observations of the geomagnetic field for the retrospective world interval July 26–August 14, 1972". in Coffey, H. E.. Collected Data Reports on August 1972 Solar‐Terrestrial Events. Report UAG‐28. 3. Boulder CO: NOAA. pp. 743. 
  30. Tsurutani, Bruce T.; W. D. Gonzalez; F. Tang; Y. T. Lee; M. Okada; D. Park (1992). "Reply to L. J. Lanzerotti: Solar wind RAM pressure corrections and an estimation of the efficiency of viscous interaction". Geophys. Res. Lett. 19 (19): 1993–1994. doi:10.1029/92GL02239. http://urlib.net/6qtX3pFwXQZ3r59YCT/GUiDR. 
  31. Anderson III, C. W.; L J. Lanzerotti; C. G. MacLennan (1974). "Outage of the L4 System and the Geomagnetic Disturbances of 4 August 1972". Bell System Technical Journal 53 (9): 1817–1837. doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1974.tb02817.x.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fj.1538-7305.1974.tb02817.x
  32. D'uston, C.; J. M. Bosqued; F. Cambou; V. V. Temny; G. N. Zastenker; O. L. Vaisberg; E. G. Eroshenko (1977). "Energetic properties of interplanetary plasma at the earth's orbit following the August 4, 1972 flare". Sol. Phys. 51 (1): 217–229. doi:10.1007/BF00240459.
  33. Dryer, M.; Z. K. Smith; R. S. Steinolfson; J. D. Mihalov; J. H. Wolfe; J. ‐K. Chao (1976). "Interplanetary disturbances caused by the August 1972 solar flares as observed by Pioneer 9". J. Geophys. Res. 81 (25): 4651–4663. doi:10.1029/JA081i025p04651.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1029%2FJA081i025p04651
  34. "Major Solar Flare Could Have Been Lethal (1972)". NASA: Goddard Space Flight Center. http://spaceweatherlivinghistory.org/timeline/31. Retrieved November 19, 2018. 
  35. Cahill Jr., L. J.; T. L. Skillman (1977). "The magnetopause at 5.2 RE in August 1972: Magnetopause motion". J. Geophys. Res. 82 (10): 1566–1572. doi:10.1029/JA082i010p01566.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1029%2FJA082i010p01566
  36. Rauschenbach, Hans S. (1980). Solar cell array design handbook: The principles and technology of photovoltaic energy conversion. New York: Nostrand Reinhold Co. 
  37. Shea, M. A.; D. F.Smart (1998). "Space weather: The effects on operations in space". Adv. Space Res. 22 (1): 29–38. doi:10.1016/S0273-1177(97)01097-1.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2FS0273-1177%2897%2901097-1
  38. McKinnon, J. A. (1972). August 1972 Solar Activity and Related Geophysical Effects. NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL SEL-22. Boulder, CO: NOAA Space Environment Laboratory. 
  39. Akasofu, S. ‐I. (1974). "The Midday Red Aurora Observed at the South Pole on August 5, 1972". J. Geophys. Res. 79 (19): 2904–2910. doi:10.1029/ja079i019p02904.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1029%2Fja079i019p02904
  40. Odintsova, I. N.; L. N. Leshchenko; K. N. Valileive; G. V. Givishvili (1973). "On the geo‐activity of the solar flares of 2, 4, 7 and 11 August 1972". in Coffey, H. E.. Collected data reports on August 1972 solar‐terrestrial events. Report UAG‐28. 3. Boulder, CO: NOAA. pp. 708–716. 
  41. Albertson, V.D.; J.M. Thorson (1974). "Power System Disturbances During A K-8 Geomagnetic Storm: August 4, 1972". IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems PAS-93 (4): 1025–1030. doi:10.1109/TPAS.1974.294046.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1109%2FTPAS.1974.294046
  42. Boteler, D. H.; G. Jansen van Beek (1999). "August 4, 1972 revisited: A new look at the geomagnetic disturbance that caused the L4 cable system outage". Geophys. Res. Lett. 26 (5): 577–580. doi:10.1029/1999GL900035.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1029%2F1999GL900035
  43. "U.S. Navy Report, Mine Warfare Project Office - The Mining of North Vietnam, 8 May 1972 to 14 January 1973". Texas Tech: Vietnam Center and Archive. https://vva.vietnam.ttu.edu/repositories/2/digital_objects/83295. Retrieved November 17, 2018. 
  44. Gonzales, Michael. The Forgotten History; The Mining Campaigns of Vietnam 1967-1973. War Stories Collections, Dr. Ralph R. Chase West Texas Collection, Angelo State University, San Angelo, Texas. p. 4. https://www.angelo.edu/content/files/21974‐a. Retrieved November 18, 2018. 
  45. Lockwood, Mike; M. Hapgood (2007). "The Rough Guide to the Moon and Mars". Astron. Geophys. 48 (6): 11–17. doi:10.1111/j.1468-4004.2007.48611.x. http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/38537/1/243_LockwoodHapgood_AandG.pdf. 
  46. Phillips, Tony (November 9, 2018). "A Blast from the Past (Wartime Space Weather in Vietnam". http://www.spaceweather.com/archive.php?view=1&day=09&month=11&year=2018. 
  47. Baker, D. N.; X. Li; A. Pulkkinen; C. M. Ngwira; M. L. Mays; A. B. Galvin; K. D. C. Simunac (2013). "A major solar eruptive event in July 2012: Defining extreme space weather scenarios". Space Weather 11 (10): 585–691. doi:10.1002/swe.20097.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fswe.20097
  48. Gonzalez, W. D.; E. Echer; A.L. Clúa de Gonzalez; B.T. Tsurutani; G.S. Lakhina (2011). "Extreme geomagnetic storms, recent Gleissberg cycles and space era-superintense storms". J. Atmospheric Sol.-Terr. Phys. 73 (11–12): 1147–1453. doi:10.1016/j.jastp.2010.07.023.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.jastp.2010.07.023
  49. Extreme space weather: impacts on engineered systems and infrastructure. London: Royal Academy of Engineering. 2013. ISBN 978-1-903496-95-4. https://www.raeng.org.uk/publications/reports/space-weather-full-report. 
More
©Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons-Attribution ShareAlike (CC BY-SA) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!
ScholarVision Creations
Feedback