Microwave Heating and Plasma for Biosecurity Applications: History
View Latest Version
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Contributor:
Saeedeh Taheri
,
Dylan John McFarlane
,
Scott William Mattner
,
Graham Ian Brodie

Microwave heating has been shown to rapidly heat and kill a wide range of pests and pathogens. Examples of microwave thermal disinfestation of soils, grains, hay, and timber are presented and discussed. Microwave energy can also ionize various gasses, including air, to create plasma. Plasmas are described by many characteristics, such as temperature, degree of ionization, and density. In the “after glow” (cold plasma) of a plasma discharge, there are sufficient charged particles and excited atoms to generate elevated UV levels and ionize the surfaces of objects.

  • biosecurity
  • microwave
  • heating
  • plasma
  • pathogens
  • pests

1. Introduction

Biosecurity is critical to protect ecological and agricultural productions systems around the planet. Biosecurity applies various procedures or measures, which are designed to protect the population and environment against the introduction, establishment and spread of harmful biological organisms or substances. The fumigant methyl bromide is an important biosecurity tool for disinfesting internationally traded commodities against quarantine pathogens, pests, and weeds. However, methyl bromide is implicated in the degradation of stratospheric ozone and non-quarantine and pre-shipment uses are being regulated and phased out under the 1992 Montreal Protocol [1]. Quarantine uses of methyl bromide are not currently regulated under the Protocol and are defined as “treatments to prevent the introduction, establishment and/or spread of quarantine pests (including diseases), or to ensure their official control”. Similarly, pre-shipment uses of methyl bromide are currently not regulated and are defined as “non-quarantine applications applied within 21 days prior to export to meet the official requirements of the importing country or existing official requirements of the exporting country” (Decisions VI/11, VII/5 and XI/12 of the Montreal Protocol). Currently, the official worldwide use of methyl bromide for quarantine and pre-shipment purposes as reported by Parties to the Montreal Protocol under Article 7 averages 10,000 tons per year (see link to reference). Therefore, alternative biosecurity technology must be explored.
Among the non-chemical concepts for commodity disinfestation is thermal treatment using solar energy and steam [2]. An advantage of these approaches is there is little risk of resistance developing in pest and pathogen populations. However, these conventional thermal treatments are very time and energy intensive, and this often makes their adoption uneconomical. In contrast, microwave energy is a very fast and efficient method that can be used for directly heating various materials [3]. An advantage of the microwave is that it can heat the commodity and not the container or the environment and this makes the process very efficient. It is even possible to efficiently heat, melt, and process metals using specially designed industrial microwave ovens [4]. Microwave energy can also be used to ionize various gasses, including air, to create plasma [5][6][7], which can be used to sterilize surfaces.

2. Thermal Disinfestation

Over the past 50 years, the use of electromagnetic energy, especially in the radio and microwave frequency range, has been proposed as a method of controlling pests in soils, grains, and timber products [8]. Initially, most research was focused on thermal treatment of the commodity [8][9]; however, electromagnetic energy can be used in other ways to disinfest or disinfect materials.
Focusing firstly on the thermal effects of electromagnetic treatment, the fatal impacts of high temperatures on botanical and zoological specimens have been studied in detail for over a century [10]. An empirical relationship between lethal temperature and temperature holding time has been developed by Lepeschkin [11]:
 
T = 79.8 − 12.8 · l o g 10 Z
where T is the lethal temperature (°C), and Z is the lethal temperature holding time, in minutes [10]. Individual relationships for different species of plants and pathogens [11][12][13] have been developed over time. Ultimately, heat can provide similar lethal effects to chemicals and therefore has been used in soil, timber, hay, and grain sanitation processes [14] for some time.
Various heat sources have been considered for sanitation applications. These include, solarization, solar heating, flaming, steam heating, and electromagnetic heating. The following section highlights how electromagnetic heating, especially using microwave energy, has been used for thermal sanitization.

3. Microwave Heat Sanitization

Many studies have considered microwave heating as a method of sanitization. Table 1 provides an overview of some key research. One of the main areas of study has been the deactivation of weed seeds in the soil. Davis, et al. [15] demonstrated the efficacy of microwave energy for weed management. They developed a prototype system, called the “Zapper” [16], which could treat the soil in situ, using a variant on a horn antenna to apply the microwave energy to the soil’s surface. To obtain consistent pre-emergent control of both broadleaved weeds and grasses, it was necessary to apply at least 183 J cm−2. Brodie, et al. [17] later confirmed that 185 J cm−2 of microwave energy, when applied to moist soil, could effectively kill various Lolium spp. (ryegrasses) seeds to a depth of 5 cm. Treating seeds in dry soil required over 550 J cm−2 of microwave energy to kill seeds to a depth of only 2–3 cm [17].
The energy required to control emerged weeds using a horn antenna is quite variable (77–500 J cm−2) [15][18], depending in the species and the height of the horn antenna above the ground. Recent experiments using a 15 cm wide slow-wave applicator, connected to a 5-kW microwave source, and being towed at an equivalent speed of approximately 0.6 km h−1 (17 cm s−1), has demonstrated that applying 20 J cm−2 of microwave energy can kill most emerged weeds (unpublished).

3.1. Effects on Soil Biota

It has been demonstrated that microwave soil heating has an immediate impact on soil microbial communities [19]. The populations of some species are significantly reduced [20]; however, other species, including nitrifying bacteria and archaea, are relatively unaffected, except at extremely high doses of microwave energy [21][22][23]. Soil bacterial and fungal community compositions change significantly due to microwave soil treatment and recovery of biological diversity takes more than 4–5 weeks [22]. Recent experiments have demonstrated that microwave soil treatments, with the similar intensity necessary to kill weed seeds, significantly reduce the number of soil-borne fungal pathogens, including Fusarium spp., Macrophomina phaseolina, and Thielaviopsis basicola (unpublished).

3.2. Implications for Cropping Systems

The combination of removal of weed competition and soil disinfestation provided by microwave soil treatment results in significant crop yield increases. In field experiments, increases in crop yield of between 18% and 84%, compared with the untreated or hand-weeded controls, have been observed [24][25]. Pot experiments have demonstrated that a single microwave soil treatment can provide significant crop yield increases over several seasons, with the longest observations spanning three years, so far [26].
Table 1. Summary of microwave-based weed management research.
Microwave Frequency Power Level Irradiation Duration Treatment Scenario Target Weed Species Percentage Weed/Seed Destruction Reference
39 MHz – 4–37 s Pre-emergence Hard Red Winter Wheat 50% seed mortality [27]
2.45 GHz 600 W 60 s Pre-emergence
(dry, 4 h soaked and 46 h germinated seeds)		 Zea mays, Arachis hypogaea, Prosopis juliflora, Cucumis sativus, Brassica spp., Rumex crispus, Echinochloa colonum, Amaranthus sp., Gossypium hirsutum, Glycine max, Sorghum vulgare and Triticum vulgare 17% reduction in germination in dry seeds but 100% in case of moist seeds at 10 s of exposure [15]
2.45 GHz 600 W 8 s Post-emergence (aquatic weed) Duckweed (Wolffia punctat) 50% [28]
2.45 GHz 2–4 kW Varying exposure time (not mention properly) Pre- and post-emergences Johonsongrass Moriningglory
Redroot Pigweed
Texas panicium Barnyardgrass
Sunflower
London rocket
Rigseed euphrobia		 For post-emergence MW treatment 309 J cm–2 energy was required for 100% control (field conditions) while for pre-emergence MW weed control 73 J cm−2 gave 85–100% control (Glass house conditions) [29]
2.45 GHz 45–720 J cm−2 No information Pre-emergence London rocket (13 cm deep in soil profile) and Sunflower (2.5 cm seeded depth) 87% for London rocket and 93% for Sunflower [30]
2.45 GHz 100–750 W 120–1200 s Pre-emergence Clover and Turnip 60–78% reduction in seeds germination [31]
2.45 GHz 0.1–1.5 kW Varying exposure time Pre-emergence of seeds in soil Black Medic, Barnyard grass, Foxtail purslane, Redroot pigweed, Large crabgrass 50% [32]
2.45 GHz – 360 s Pre-emergence Brassica napus, Linum usitatissimum, Avena fatua 85–95% [33]
9 GHz 10–30 mW cm–2 22–24 h Post emergence Zea mays 100% growth inhibitions [34]
2.45 GHz 1.2 kW 5–45 s Pre-emergence Trifolium and Medicago 85% reduction in germination [35]
2.45 GHz 500 W 30 s Pre-emergence Avena fatua 60% (based on seed moisture) [36]
2.45 GHz 1.5 kW 0, 10, 20, and 30 Pre-emergence Wild Oat and Wheat 90–100% [37]
2.45 GHz – 120 s Pre-emergence Avena sativa and native weed seeds Reduced weed seeds emergence [38]
2.45 GHz 900 W 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, and 256 s Post-emergence Abutilon theophrasti, Pancium miliaceum, Lucerne and Rapeseed Complete dehydrating of plants [39]
2.45 GHz 800 W 120, 240, 420 and 960 s Pre-emergence Rubber vine, Parthenium and Bellyache bush 88% (Rubber vine), 67% (Parthenium) and 94% (Bellyache bush) mortality at 960 s irradiation [40]
2.45 GHz 0.10–1.24 kWh m–2 30–300 s Pre- and post-emergence Malva parviflora and Triticum aestivum 100% destruction of tested specie at 0.65 kWh m–2 [41]
2.45 GHz 700 W 120, 240, 320 and 720 s Pre-emergence treatment of soil Lolium perenne and Lolium rigidum 100% seed mortality was achieved at 240 s of MW irradiation [17]
2.45 GHz 750 W 5, 15, 30 and 60 s Pre- and post-emergence Prickly Paddy melon 100% debilitation of plants [42]
2.45 GHz 2 kW 5, 10, 15, 30, 60 s Post-emergence Ryegrass and Wild Radish 100% mortality [18]
While disinfestation of soil has been a key focus of microwave research, other disinfestation and disinfestation studies have been undertaken. Table 2 lists some of the key findings from several examples.
Table 2. Table of investigations into thermal control of pests and pathogens using microwave heating.
Author Title Main Finding Reference
Almaiman et al. Effects of microwave heat treatment on fungal growth, functional properties, total phenolic content, and antioxidant activity of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) grain Microwave heating significantly reduced fungal incidence in the sorghum grain. No significant changes were found in the crude protein and digestibility of protein, water holding capacity, and oil holding capacity of sorghum; however, application of higher microwave caused a sharp reduction in the protein solubility, foaming capacity, emulsion capacity, and the emulsion stability. Conversely, a significant increase in total phenolic content and antioxidant activity was observed after microwave heat treatment. [43]
Mahdi et al. Effect of Microwave Radiation on Bacteria, Fungi and Some Growth Characteristics of Cowpea Vigna unguiculata L. Microwave soil treatment significantly reduced fungi and bacteria that could be cultured from the soil. At the highest energy level (15 kJ kg−1 soil) both fungi and bacteria were eliminated. Cowpea above ground biomass and root mass significantly increased (103% increase above the control) for moderate doses of microwave energy (10 kJ kg−1 soil), but almost returned to the same level as the untreated control for very high doses of microwave energy (15 kJ kg−1 soil). [44]
Tiwari et al. Dielectric heating-assisted disinfestation of black gram and its effect on protein profile: A comparative study on radio frequency and microwave heating Pulse beetle (Callosobruchus maculatus) in blackgram (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper) kernels, were subjected to radio frequency and microwave heating. The pupa stage of the insect’s life cycle was found to be more resilient to heat treatment than eggs, larvae, and adults. There were also measurable changes in the amino acid profile of the blackgram. [45]
Speir et al. Effects of microwave radiation on the microbial biomass, phosphatase activity and levels of extractable N and P in a low fertility soil under pasture Microwave irradiation was investigated as a controlled soil biocidal treatment which could selectively kill microbial biomass. Under the experimental conditions chosen, irradiation of the soil sample for 90 s gave a kill of microbial biomass equal to that achieved by CHCl3 fumigation. Extractable mineral N was increased after incubation of irradiated soil, and after 90 s irradiation was only slightly lower than that of fumigated soil. [46]
Yadav et al. Microwave technology for disinfestation of cereals and pulses: An overview Microwaves may be an alternate to chemical methods of killing insects in grain as their application do not leave any undesirable residues and thus might be very effective for controlling insect infestation compared to other available methods. Microwave disinfestation can provide a continuous process to allow large quantities of products to pass in a shorter period. Microwave disinfestation is considered safe and competitive alternative method to fumigation as it avoids environmental pollution. [47]
Most microwave treatments are focused on the temperature range below 100 °C. This is partly because of the very high latent heat of vaporization for water; however, some studies have shown that microwave heating can achieve much higher temperatures. For example, Falciglia and Vagliasindi [48] achieved temperatures of up to 260 °C, when 180 MJ kg−1 of microwave heat was applied to soil at 12% moisture content (dry weight basis). These temperatures are high enough to kill most pathogens, including anthrax spores. Microwave assisted pyrolysis at temperatures above 700 °C have been achieved [49][50]. At these temperatures, organic molecules are decomposed to produce syngas, bio-oil, and biochar. These products can be regarded as sterile.

3.3. Microwave Treatment of Animal Fodder

Weed seeds, pests (e.g., fire ants), and pathogens are often transported in hay [51]. Fumigation can manage these problems; however, like with soil disinfestation, it is possible for heat to overcome these problems as well [52]. In accordance with the temperature–time response of all living things, the mortality of insects, seeds, and pathogens increases with temperature and exposure time [53].
Dong, et al. [54] discovered that the organic matter degradability of wheat straw in the rumen of yaks was increased by around 20% after 4 min of treatment in a 750 W, 2.54 GHz, microwave oven. Sadeghi and Shawrang [55] showed that microwave treatment of canola meal increased in vitro dry matter disappearance, including substances that were deemed undegradable in the rumen. Sadeghi and Shawrang [56] also showed that microwave treatment reduced the rumen degradable starch fraction of corn grain and decreased crude protein degradation of the soya bean meal compared with untreated samples. Small scale in vitro pepsin-cellulase digestion experiments [57] demonstrated that microwave treatment: increased dry matter percentage with increasing microwave treatment time; increased in vitro dry matter disappearance with increasing microwave treatment time; but had no significant effect on post-digestion crude protein content. Live animal trials, using microwave-treated lucerne hay showed an 8.1% higher increase in body weight, compared with animals fed with untreated hay [57].

3.4. Microwave Treatment of Timber for Pest Control

Non-chemical treatments for infested timber have been reported for some time [58]. The efficacy of excessive heat or cold, electrocution and microwave energy have all been investigated. Heating of the timber using high temperature kilns resulted in 90 to 96% mortality of Western Drywood Termites (Isoptera: Kalotermitidae), three days after treatment [58]. It was interesting to note that mortality rose to 98% after 4 weeks [58].
When exposed to radiofrequencies/microwaves the first reaction of insects is an attempt to escape; this is followed by loss of motor coordination, stiffening, immobility and, after a certain time interval, death [59]. Lewis [60] demonstrated that Western Drywood Termites could be controlled by microwave heating, with 100% mortality being achieved at a microwave dose density of 65 J cm−2. Massa, Panariello, Pinchera, Schettino, Caprio, Griffo and Migliore [59] investigated the efficacy of microwave treatment of standing live palm trees for the control of Red Palm Weevil (Rhynchophorus ferrugineus Olivier). Their objective was to thermally control the weevil without killing the host plant. Differences in susceptibility of the insect were found between development stages within the species. Their results showed that the adult insects are much more sensitive to heat than the larger larvae with 20 min at 50 °C and only 4 min at 80 °C causing adult death. Lethal time for the larvae varies with weight and the most resistant were those weighting between 4 and 6 g, requiring 30 min at 50 °C [59]. Based on their successful experimental work, a semi-commercial prototype has been developed to treat palm trees, in situ, using a ring applicator to apply the microwave energy to the tree.

3.5. Scale-Up of Microwave Heating Systems

Scale-up of microwave heating systems has been explored for over 40 years [61]. Many efficient industrial microwave heating plants have been established in several industries, including: the food industry, the rubber processing industry, the timber industry, several waste management industries, and for general product drying [61]; however, scale-up of most microwave technologies still requires much more investigation and refinement. Most research is completed at laboratory scale, where the field densities in small samples are high. Achieving similar field densities when processing large volumes of material can be challenging.
The two important parameters that limit field density inside the material are: the penetration depth of the microwave fields into the processed material and available power. Penetration depth depends on the dielectric properties of the material and the operating frequency of the microwave system [62][63][64][65]. Penetration depth is directly dependent on microwave frequency, so the first step in the scale-up process usually implies the use of lower industrial, scientific, and medical (ISM) frequencies. For example, many microwave heating experiments are performed at 2450 MHz, which is the frequency used in domestic microwave ovens; however, industrial-scale systems usually operate at 915 MHz (or 868 MHz or 922 MHz, depending on how this ISM band is defined in different parts of the world), which is the next lower ISM frequency [66]. Adopting the lower frequency increases the penetration depth of the microwave fields. The trade-off of increasing penetration depth is that the volume of material which is absorbing microwave energy significantly increases and therefore the resulting field density in the larger volume is significantly reduced. The field density can be increased by increasing the available microwave power.
Microwave generators, varying from a few hundred watts up to 100 kW can be used individually [3] or in multiple generator designs [67][68] for microwave heating applications. Although they only seem to have been used for research and military applications, single relativistic cavity magnetrons have been shown to produce in excess of 4 GW [69]. Multiple phase-locked sources output of 3 GW total output; repetitive, near-GW peak powers at pulse repetition rates up to 1 kHz, and long-pulse operation with energy per pulse of about 1 kJ have also been achieved [69].
Installations vary in design, depending on the commodity being processed. Continuous processing can be achieved using tunnel applicators [3]; however, careful electromagnetic design of the in-feed and out-feed ports is needed to prevent radiation leakage into the environment. Microwave cavities [3][70][71] can better prevent microwave field leakage; however, they must be used for batch processing. Therefore, the major challenges of microwave heating scale-up are material handling and achieving similar field densities inside the commodity as was achieved during laboratory-scale experiments.

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/thermo2030022

References

  1. Ozone Secretariat: United Nations Environment Programme. The Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer; United Nations Environment Programme: Nairobi, Kenya, 2000.
  2. Sharp, J.L. Heat and Cold Treatments for Postharvest Quarantine Disinfestation of Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) and Other Quarantine Pests. Fla. Entomol. 1993, 76, 212–218.
  3. Metaxas, A.C.; Meredith, R.J. Industrial Microwave Heating; Peter Peregrinus: London, UK, 1983.
  4. Awida, M.H.; Shah, N.; Warren, B.; Ripley, E.; Fathy, A.E. Modeling of an industrial microwave furnace for metal casting applications. In Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest, Atlanta, GA, USA, 15–20 June 2008; pp. 221–224.
  5. Horikoshi, S.; Brodie, G.; Takaki, K.; Serpone, N. Agritech: Innovative Agriculture Using Microwaves and Plasmas: Thermal and Non-Thermal Processing; Springer: Tokyo, Japan, 2022.
  6. Taheri, S.; Brodie, G.I.; Gupta, D.; Jacob, M.V. Microwave Atmospheric Plasma Processed Air and Argon for Disinfection of Lentil from BGM. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual Microwave Power Symposium (IMPI 55), Virtual, 28 June–1 July 2021; pp. 31–33.
  7. García, M.C.; Mora, M.; Esquivel, D.; Foster, J.E.; Rodero, A.; Jiménez-Sanchidrián, C.; Romero-Salguero, F.J. Microwave atmospheric pressure plasma jets for wastewater treatment: Degradation of methylene blue as a model dye. Chemosphere 2017, 180, 239–246.
  8. Nelson, S.O. A review and assessment of microwave energy for soil treatment to control pests. Trans. ASAE 1996, 39, 281–289.
  9. Wang, S.; Tang, J.; Johnson, J.A.; Mitcham, E.; Hansen, J.D.; Hallman, G.; Drake, S.R.; Wang, Y. Dielectric Properties of Fruits and Insect Pests as related to Radio Frequency and Microwave Treatments. Biosyst. Eng. 2003, 85, 201–212.
  10. Levitt, J. Response of Plants to Environmental Stresses; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1980; Volume 1.
  11. Lepeschkin, W.W. Zur Kenntnis der Einwirkung supamaximaler Temperaturen auf die Pflanze. Ber. Dtsch. Bot. Ges. 1912, 30, 713–714.
  12. Shlevin, E.; Saguy, I.S.; Mahrer, Y.; Katan, J. Modeling the Survival of Two Soilborne Pathogens Under Dry Structural Solarization. Phytopathology 2003, 93, 1247–1257.
  13. Trevisani, M.; Mancusi, R.; Valero, A. Thermal inactivation kinetics of shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in buffalo mozzarella curd. J. Dairy Sci. 2014, 97, 642–650.
  14. Taheri, S.; Brodie, G.I.; Gupta, D.; Dadu, R.H.R. Effect of Microwave Radiation on Internal Inoculum of Ascochyta Blight in Lentil Seeds at Different Seed Moisture Contents. Trans. ASABE 2019, 62, 33–43.
  15. Davis, F.S.; Wayland, J.R.; Merkle, M.G. Ultrahigh-Frequency Electromagnetic Fields for Weed Control: Phytotoxicity and Selectivity. Science 1971, 173, 535–537.
  16. Davis, F. “Zapper” blasts weed seeds. New Zealand J. Agric. 1975, 53–54.
  17. Brodie, G.; Harris, G.; Pasma, L.; Travers, A.; Leyson, D.; Lancaster, C.; Woodworth, J. Microwave soil heating for controlling ryegrass seed germination. Trans. ASABE 2009, 52, 295–302.
  18. Brodie, G.; Hollins, E. The Effect of Microwave Treatment on Ryegrass and Wild Radish Plants and Seeds. Glob. J. Agric. Innov. Res. Dev. 2015, 2, 16–24.
  19. Brodie, G.; Grixti, M.; Hollins, E.; Cole, M. The Effect of Microwave Soil Treatment on Key Soil Biota. In Proceedings of the 1st URSI Atlantic Radio Science Conference, Gran Canaria, Spain, 16–24 May 2015; p. 1189.
  20. Cooper, A.P.; Brodie, G. The effect of microwave radiation and soil depth on soil pH, N, P, K, SO4 and bacterial colonies. Plant Prot. Q. 2009, 24, 67–70.
  21. Vela, G.R.; Wu, J.F.; Smith, D. Effect of 2450 MHz microwave radiation on some soil microorganisms in situ. Soil Sci. 1976, 121, 44–51.
  22. Khan, M.J.; Jurburg, S.D.; He, J.; Brodie, G.; Gupta, D. Impact of microwave disinfestation treatments on the bacterial communities of no-till agricultural soils. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2019, 71, 1006–1017.
  23. Hendricks, C.W.; Pascoe, N. Soil microbial biomass estimates using 2450 MHz microwave irradiation. Plant Soil 1988, 110, 39–47.
  24. Brodie, G.; Khan, M.J.; Gupta, D. Microwave Soil Treatment and Plant Growth. In Sustainable Crop Production; Filho, M.C.M.T., Hasanuzzaman, M., Eds.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2019.
  25. Khan, M.J.; Brodie, G.I. Microwave Weed and Soil Treatment in Rice Production. In Rice Crop—Current Development; Shah, F., Khan, Z.H., Iqbal, A., Eds.; IntechOpen: Vienna, Austria, 2018; pp. 99–127.
  26. Khan, M.J.; Brodie, G.I.; Gupta, D.; He, J. Microwave Soil Treatment Increases Soil Nitrogen Supply for Sustained Wheat Productivity. Trans. ASABE 2019, 62, 355–362.
  27. Nelson, S.; Walker, E.R. Effects of radio-frequency electrical seed treatment. Agricltural Eng. 1961, 42, 688–691.
  28. Champ, M.; Davis, F.; Wayland, J. Ultrahigh-frequency electromagnetic radiation utilized for aquatic vegetation control. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of South Eastern Association Game and Fish Commissioners, Knoxville, TN, USA, 22–25 October 1972.
  29. Wayland, J.; Davis, F.; Merkle, M. Toxicity of an UHF device to plant seeds in soil. Weed Sci. 1973, 21, 161–162.
  30. Menges, R.; Wayland, J. UHF Electromagnetic energy for weed control in vegetables. Weed Sci. 1974, 22, 584–590.
  31. Hightower, N.C.; Burdette, E.; Burns, C. Investigation of the Use of Microwave Energy for Weed Seed and Wood Products Insect Control; Georgia Institute of Technology: Atlanta, GA, USA, 1974.
  32. Rice, R.P.; Putnam, A.R. Some factors which influence the toxicity of UHF energy to weed seeds. Weed Sci. 1977, 25, 179–183.
  33. Bhartia, P.; Lebell, M.; Baron, J. Weed control with electromagnetic fields. J. Microw. Power 1977, 12, 52–54.
  34. Bigu-Del-Blanco, J.; Bristow, J.; Romero-Sierra, C. Effects of low-level microwave radiation on germination and growth rate in corn seeds. Proc. IEEE 1977, 65, 1086–1088.
  35. Crawford, A. Phytotoxicity threshold levels of microwave radiation for Trifolium and Medicago seeds. Seed Sci. Technol. 1977, 5, 671–676.
  36. Diprose, M.; Benson, F.; Willis, A. The effect of externally applied electrostatic fields, microwave radiation and electric currents on plants and other organisms, with special reference to weed control. Bot. Rev. 1984, 50, 171–223.
  37. Lal, R.; Reed, W. The effect of microwave energy on germination and dormancy of wild oat seeds. Can. Agric. Eng. 1980, 22, 85–88.
  38. Barker, A.V.; Craker, L.E. Inhibition of Weed Seed Germination by Microwaves. Agron. J. 1991, 83, 302–305.
  39. Sartorato, I.; Zanin, G.; Baldoin, C.; De Zanche, C. Observations on the potential of microwaves for weed control. Weed Res. 2006, 46, 1–9.
  40. Bebawi, F.; Cooper, A.; Brodie, G.; Madigan, B.; Vitelli, J.; Worsley, K.; Davis, K. Effect of microwave radiation on seed mortality of rubber vine (Cryptostegia grandiflora R. Br.), parthenium (Parthenium hysterophorous L.) and bellyache bush (Jatropha gossypiifolia L.). Plant Prot. Q. 2007, 22, 136.
  41. Brodie, G.; Hamilton, S.; Woodworth, J. An assessment of microwave soil pasteurization for killing seeds and weeds. Plant Prot. Q. 2007, 22, 143.
  42. Brodie, G.; Ryan, C.; Lancaster, C. The Effect of Microwave Radiation on Prickly Paddy Melon (Cucumis myriocarpus). Int. J. Agron. 2012, 2012, 287608.
  43. Almaiman, S.A.; Albadr, N.A.; Alsulaim, S.; Alhuthayli, H.F.; Osman, M.A.; Hassan, A.B. Effects of microwave heat treatment on fungal growth, functional properties, total phenolic content, and antioxidant activity of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) grain. Food Chem. 2021, 348, 128979.
  44. Mahdi, W.M.; Al-Badri, K.S.L.; Alqaisi, M.R.M. Effect of Microwave Radiation on Bacteria, Fungi and Some Growth Characteristics of Cowpea Vigna unguiculata L. Gesunde Pflanz. 2020, 73, 161–167.
  45. Tiwari, A.; Shanmugasundaram, S.; Jaganmohan, R.; Manickam, L. Dielectric heating-assisted disinfestation of black gram and its effect on protein profile: A comparative study on radio frequency and microwave heating. Legume Sci. 2021, 3, e83.
  46. Speir, T.W.; Cowling, J.C.; Sparling, G.P.; West, A.W.; Corderoy, D.M. Effects of microwave radiation on the microbial biomass, phosphatase activity and levels of extractable N and P in a low fertility soil under pasture. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1986, 18, 377–382.
  47. Deep, N.Y.; Tanupriya, A.; Monika, S.; Gupta, R.K. Microwave technology for disinfestation of cereals and pulses: An overview. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 51, 3568–3576.
  48. Falciglia, P.P.; Vagliasindi, F.G.A. Techno-economic analysis of hydrocarbon-polluted soil treatment by using ex situ microwave heating: Influence of soil texture and soil moisture on electric field penetration, operating conditions and energy costs. J. Soils Sediments 2016, 16, 1330–1344.
  49. Bhatta Kaudal, B.; Aponte, C.; Brodie, G. Biochar from biosolids microwaved-pyrolysis: Characteristics and potential for use as growing media amendment. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2018, 130, 181–189.
  50. Antunes, E.; Jacob, M.V.; Brodie, G.; Schneider, P.A. Isotherms, kinetics and mechanism analysis of phosphorus recovery from aqueous solution by calcium-rich biochar produced from biosolids via microwave pyrolysis. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 395–403.
  51. Huss, A.R.; Schumacher, L.L.; Cochrane, R.A.; Poulsen, E.; Bai, J.; Woodworth, J.C.; Dritz, S.S.; Stark, C.R.; Jones, C.K. Elimination of Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus in an Animal Feed Manufacturing Facility. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, 1–11.
  52. Tang, J.; Mitcham, E.J.; Wang, S.; Lurie, S. Heat Treatments for Postharvest Pest Control: Theory and Practice; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2007.
  53. Mbata, G.N.; Phillips, T.W. Effects of temperature and exposure time on mortality of stored-product insects exposed to low pressure. J. Econ. Entomol. 2001, 94, 1302–1307.
  54. Dong, S.; Long, R.; Zhang, D.; Hu, Z.; Pu, X. Effect of microwave treatment on chemical composition and in sacco digestibility of wheat straw in yak cow Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2005, 18, 27–31.
  55. Sadeghi, A.A.; Shawrang, P. Effects of microwave irradiation on ruminal degradability and in vitro digestibility of canola meal. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2006, 127, 45–54.
  56. Sadeghi, A.A.; Shawrang, P. Effects of microwave irradiation on ruminal protein and starch degradation of corn grain. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2006, 127, 113–123.
  57. Brodie, G.; Rath, C.; Devanny, M.; Reeve, J.; Lancaster, C.; Harris, G.; Chaplin, S.; Laird, C. Effect of microwave treatment on lucerne fodder. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2010, 50, 124–129.
  58. Lewis, V.R.; Haverty, M.I. Evaluation of six techniques for control of the western drywood termite (Isoptera: Kalotermitidae) in structures. J. Econ. Entomol. 1996, 89, 922–934.
  59. Massa, R.; Panariello, G.; Pinchera, D.; Schettino, F.; Caprio, E.; Griffo, R.; Migliore, M.D. Experimental and numerical evaluations on palm microwave heating for Red Palm Weevil pest control. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 45299.
  60. Lewis, V.R.; Power, A.B.; Haverty, M.I. Laboratory evaluation of microwaves for control of the western drywood termite. For. Prod. J. 2000, 50, 79–87.
  61. Leonelli, C.; Mason, T.J. Microwave and ultrasonic processing: Now a realistic option for industry. Chem. Eng. Processing: Process Intensif. 2010, 49, 885–900.
  62. Kabir, H.; Khan, M.J.; Brodie, G.; Gupta, D.; Pang, A.; Jacob, M.V.; Antunes, E. Measurement and modelling of soil dielectric properties as a function of soil class and moisture content. J. Microw. Power Electromagn. Energy 2020, 54, 3–18.
  63. Taheri, S.; Brodie, G.; Jacob, M.V.; Antunes, E. Dielectric properties of chickpea, red and green lentil in the microwave frequency range as a function of temperature and moisture content. J. Microw. Power Electromagn. Energy 2018, 52, 198–214.
  64. Vollmer, M. Physics of the microwave oven. Phys. Educ. 2004, 39, 74–81.
  65. Al-Holy, M.; Wang, Y.; Tang, J.; Rasco, B. Dielectric properties of salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) and sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus) caviar at radio frequency (RF) and microwave (MW) pasteurization frequencies. J. Food Eng. 2005, 70, 564–570.
  66. Guan, D.; Younce, F.; Tang, J.; Pathak, S.; Komarov, V. Heating Characteristics of Mashed Potato in a 915 MHz Microwave-Circulated Water Combination Heating System. In Proceedings of the 2003 ASAE Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 27–30 July 2003; American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers: St. Joseph, MI, USA, 2003; p. 1.
  67. Harris, G.A.; Brodie, G.I.; Ozarska, B.; Taube, A. Design of a Microwave Chamber for the Purpose of Drying of Wood Components for Furniture. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Biol. Eng. 2011, 54, 363–368.
  68. Chow Ting Chan, T.V.; Reader, H.C. Computational design of a multiple magnetron cavity. In Proceedings of the 4th IEEE Afrocon Conference, Stellenbosch, South Africa, 24–27 September 1996; pp. 523–527.
  69. Benford, J. History and Future of the Relativistic Magnetron. In Proceedings of the International Conference on the Origins and Evolution of the Cavity Magnetron 2010, Bournemouth, UK, 19–20 April 2010; pp. 40–45.
  70. Meredith, R. Engineers’ Handbook of Industrial Microwave Heating; The Institute of Electrical Engineers: Stevenage, UK, 1998.
  71. Meredith, R.J. A three axis model of the mode structure of multimode cavities. J. Microw. Power Electromagn. Energy 1994, 29, 31–44.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!
Video Production Service
Feedback