1. Ceratopsian Behavior

Centrosaurine ceratopsids did not fully develop their cranial ornamentation until fully grown. Scott Sampson argues that comparing ceratopsids to modern mammals with a similar lifecycle can yield insight into the socioecology of the ancient horned dinosaurs. https://handwiki.org/wiki/index.php?curid=1122922

Parental care is implied by the fossilized remains of a grouping of Psittacosaurus consisting of one adult and 34 juveniles. In this case, the large number of juveniles may be due to communal nesting.^[1]

Fossil deposits dominated large numbers of ceratopsids from individual species suggest that these animals were at least somewhat social.^[2] However, the exact nature of ceratopsid social behavior has historically been controversial.^[3] In 1997, Lehman argued that the aggregations of many individuals preserved in bonebeds originated as local "infestations" and compared them to similar modern occurrences in crocodiles and tortoises.^[3] Other authors, such as Scott D. Sampson, interpret these deposits as the remains of large "socially complex" herds.^[3]

Modern animals with mating signals as prominent as the horns and frills of ceratopsians tend to form these kinds of large, intricate associations.^[4] Sampson found in previous work that the centrosaurine ceratopsids did not achieve fully developed mating signals until nearly fully grown.^[5] He finds commonality between the slow growth of mating signals in centrosaurines and the extended adolescence of animals whose social structures are ranked hierarchies founded on age-related differences.^[5] In these sorts of groups young males are typically sexually mature for several years before actually beginning to breed, when their mating signals are most fully developed.^[6] Females, by contrast do not have such an extended adolescence.^[6]

Other researchers who support the idea of ceratopsid herding have speculated that these associations were seasonal.^[7] This hypothesis portrays ceratopsids as living in small groups near the coasts during the rainy season and inland with the onset of the dry season.^[7] Support for the idea that ceratopsids formed herds inland comes from the greater abundance of bonebeds in inland deposits than coastal ones. The migration of ceratopsids away from the coasts may have represented a move to their nesting grounds.^[7] Many African herding animals engage in this kind of seasonal herding today.^[7] Herds would also have afforded some level of protection from the chief predators of ceratopsids, tyrannosaurids.^[8]

2. Ornithopod and Parksosaur Behavior

Trackways have also confirmed parental behavior among ornithopods from the Isle of Skye in northwestern Scotland.^[9]

2.1. Oryctodromeus

Based on current fossil evidence from dinosaurs such as Oryctodromeus, some herbivorous species seem to have led a partially fossorial (burrowing) lifestyle.^[10]

2.2. Iguanodon

The first potential evidence of herding behavior was the 1878 discovery of 31 Iguanodon dinosaurs which were then thought to have perished together in Bernissart, Belgium, after they fell into a deep, flooded sinkhole and drowned.^[11]

2.3. Hadrosauridae

Trackways of hundreds or even thousands of herbivores indicate that duck-bills (hadrosaurids) may have moved in great herds, like the American Bison or the African Springbok. Jack Horner's 1978 discovery of a Maiasaura ("good mother dinosaur") nesting ground in Montana demonstrated that parental care continued long after birth among the ornithopods.^[12]

3. Sauropodomorph Behavior

Sauropod tracks document that these animals traveled in groups composed of several different species, at least in Oxfordshire, England,^[13] although there is not evidence for specific herd structures.^[14] There is evidence that Patagonian titanosaurian sauropods (1997 discovery) nested in large groups.^[15] A dinosaur embryo (pertaining to the prosauropod Massospondylus) was found without teeth, indicating that some parental care was required to feed the young dinosaur.^[16]

4. Theropod Behavior

The interpretation of dinosaurs as gregarious has also extended to depicting carnivorous theropods as pack hunters working together to bring down large prey.^[17][18] However, this lifestyle is uncommon among the modern relatives of dinosaurs (crocodiles and other reptiles, and birds – Harris's Hawk is a well-documented exception), and the taphonomic evidence suggesting pack hunting in such theropods as Deinonychus and Allosaurus can also be interpreted as the results of fatal disputes between feeding animals, as is seen in many modern diapsid predators.^[19] Head wounds from bites suggest that theropods, at least, engaged in active aggressive confrontations.^[20]

In 2001, Bruce Rothschild and others published a study examining evidence for stress fractures in theropod dinosaurs and the implications for their behavior.^[21] Since stress fractures are caused by repeated trauma they are more likely to be a result of the animal's behavior than fractures obtained during a single injurious event.^[22] The distribution of stress fractures also has behavioral significance.^[23] Stress fractures to the hand are more likely to result from predatory behavior since injuries to the feet could be obtained while running or migrating.^[23] In order to identify stress fractures occurring in the feet specifically due to predatory behavior, the researchers checked to see if the toes which bore the greatest portion of the animals weight while in motion also had the greatest percentage of stress fractures.^[24] Since the lower end of the third metatarsal would contact the ground first while a theropod was running it would have borne the most stress and should be most predisposed to suffer stress factors more frequently.^[24] The lack of such a bias in the examined fossils indicates an origin for the stress fractures from a source other than running, like interaction with prey.^[24] They suggested that such injuries could occur as a result of the theropod trying to hold struggling prey with its feet.^[24] Contact with struggling prey is also the likely cause of tendon avulsions found in the forelimbs of Allosaurus and Tyrannosaurus.^[24] The authors concluded that the presence of stress fractures provide evidence for "very active" predation-based diets rather than obligate scavenging.^[21]

Research based on energetic modelling has also backed up the role of active predatory behaviors in theropods and has effectively ruled out obligate scavenging as a likely strategy.^[25] However scavenging was still likely to have been an important resource for many theropod with body size playing a key role in its importance. In general, the researchers found that small species, such as coelurosaurs, and species larger than 1000 kg, such as an adult Tyrannosaurs rex, would have been poor scavengers. In contrast intermediate sized species, such as Dilophosaurus, were found to have been capable of gaining significant energy though scavenging.^[25]

4.1. Majungasaurus

Cannibalism amongst some species of dinosaurs was confirmed by tooth marks found in Madagascar in 2003, involving the theropod Majungasaurus.^[26]

4.2. Ornithomimid Behavior

Sinornithomimus

One example of immature dinosaurs forming social groups comes from a site in Inner Mongolia that has yielded the remains of over twenty Sinornithomimus, from one to seven years old. This assemblage is interpreted as a social group that was trapped in mud.^[27]

4.3. Tyrannosauridae

Tooth wear patterns hint that complex head shaking behaviors may have been involved in tyrannosaur feeding.^[28] The partially healed tail of an Edmontosaurus is damaged in such a way that shows the animal was bitten by a tyrannosaur but survived.^[29]

4.4. Oviraptoridae

The Mongolian oviraptorid Citipati was discovered in a chicken-like brooding position in 1993, which may mean it was covered with an insulating layer of feathers that kept the eggs warm.^[30]

4.5. Troodontidae

A recently discovered troodont fossil demonstrates that some dinosaurs slept with their heads tucked under their arms.^[31] This behavior, which may have helped to keep the head warm, is also characteristic of modern birds.

4.6. Dromaeosauridae

Primitive dromaeosaurids such as Microraptor may have been arboreal (tree-climbing).^[32]

Velociraptor

2003 restoration by Raúl Martín showing a featherless Velociraptor battling Protoceratops. (It is now known that Velociraptor had feathers.)

From a behavioral standpoint, one of the most valuable dinosaur fossils was discovered in the Gobi Desert in 1971. It included a Velociraptor attacking a Protoceratops,^[33] providing evidence that dinosaurs did indeed attack each other.^[29]

4.7. Scansoriopterygidae

The enigmatic scansoriopterygids may have been arboreal (tree-climbing).^[34]

The content is sourced from: https://handwiki.org/wiki/Biology:Dinosaur_behavior