Human Microbiota: History
View Latest Version
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Contributor:
HandWiki

The human microbiota is the aggregate of microorganisms that resides on or within any of a number of human tissues and biofluids, including the skin, mammary glands, placenta, seminal fluid, uterus, ovarian follicles, lung, saliva, oral mucosa, conjunctiva, biliary and gastrointestinal tracts. They include bacteria, archaea, fungi, protists and viruses. Though micro-animals can also live on the human body, they are typically excluded from this definition. The human microbiome refers specifically to the collective genomes of resident microorganisms. Humans are colonized by many microorganisms; the traditional estimate is that the average human body is inhabited by ten times as many non-human cells as human cells, but more recent estimates have lowered that ratio to 3:1 or even to approximately the same number. Some microorganisms that colonize humans are commensal, meaning they co-exist without harming humans; others have a mutualistic relationship with their human hosts.:700 Conversely, some non-pathogenic microorganisms can harm human hosts via the metabolites they produce, like trimethylamine, which the human body converts to trimethylamine N-oxide via FMO3-mediated oxidation. Certain microorganisms perform tasks that are known to be useful to the human host but the role of most of them is not well understood. Those that are expected to be present, and that under normal circumstances do not cause disease, are sometimes deemed normal flora or normal microbiota. The Human Microbiome Project took on the project of sequencing the genome of the human microbiota, focusing particularly on the microbiota that normally inhabit the skin, mouth, nose, digestive tract, and vagina. It reached a milestone in 2012 when it published its initial results.

  • normal flora
  • mutualistic relationship
  • metabolites

1. Terminology

Though widely known as flora or microflora, this is a misnomer in technical terms, since the word root flora pertains to plants, and biota refers to the total collection of organisms in a particular ecosystem. Recently, the more appropriate term microbiota is applied, though its use has not eclipsed the entrenched use and recognition of flora with regard to bacteria and other microorganisms. Both terms are being used in different literature.[6]

2. Relative Numbers

As of 2014, it was often reported in popular media and in the scientific literature that there are about 10 times as many microbial cells in the human body as there are human cells; this figure was based on estimates that the human microbiome includes around 100 trillion bacterial cells and that an adult human typically has around 10 trillion human cells.[2] In 2014, the American Academy of Microbiology published a FAQ that emphasized that the number of microbial cells and the number of human cells are both estimates, and noted that recent research had arrived at a new estimate of the number of human cells – approximately 37.2 trillion, meaning that the ratio of microbial-to-human cells, if the original estimate of 100 trillion bacterial cells is correct, is closer to 3:1.[2][3] In 2016, another group published a new estimate of the ratio being roughly 1:1 (1.3:1, with "an uncertainty of 25% and a variation of 53% over the population of standard 70-kg males").[4][5]

3. Study

Flowchart illustrating how the human microbiome is studied on the DNA level.

The problem of elucidating the human microbiome is essentially identifying the members of a microbial community which includes bacteria, eukaryotes, and viruses.[10] This is done primarily using DNA-based studies, though RNA, protein and metabolite based studies are also performed.[10][11] DNA-based microbiome studies typically can be categorized as either targeted amplicon studies or more recently shotgun metagenomic studies. The former focuses on specific known marker genes and is primarily informative taxonomically, while the latter is an entire metagenomic approach which can also be used to study the functional potential of the community.[10] One of the challenges that is present in human microbiome studies, but not in other metagenomic studies is to avoid including the host DNA in the study.[12]

Aside from simply elucidating the composition of the human microbiome, one of the major questions involving the human microbiome is whether there is a "core", that is, whether there is a subset of the community that is shared among most humans.[13][14] If there is a core, then it would be possible to associate certain community compositions with disease states, which is one of the goals of the Human Microbiome Project. It is known that the human microbiome (such as the gut microbiota) is highly variable both within a single subject and among different individuals, a phenomenon which is also observed in mice.[6]

On 13 June 2012, a major milestone of the Human Microbiome Project (HMP) was announced by the NIH director Francis Collins.[9] The announcement was accompanied with a series of coordinated articles published in Nature[15][16] and several journals in the Public Library of Science (PLoS) on the same day. By mapping the normal microbial make-up of healthy humans using genome sequencing techniques, the researchers of the HMP have created a reference database and the boundaries of normal microbial variation in humans. From 242 healthy U.S. volunteers, more than 5,000 samples were collected from tissues from 15 (men) to 18 (women) body sites such as mouth, nose, skin, lower intestine (stool), and vagina. All the DNA, human and microbial, were analyzed with DNA sequencing machines. The microbial genome data were extracted by identifying the bacterial specific ribosomal RNA, 16S rRNA. The researchers calculated that more than 10,000 microbial species occupy the human ecosystem and they have identified 81 – 99% of the genera.

4. Types

4.1. Bacteria

Populations of microbes (such as bacteria and yeasts) inhabit the skin and mucosal surfaces in various parts of the body. Their role forms part of normal, healthy human physiology, however if microbe numbers grow beyond their typical ranges (often due to a compromised immune system) or if microbes populate (such as through poor hygiene or injury) areas of the body normally not colonized or sterile (such as the blood, or the lower respiratory tract, or the abdominal cavity), disease can result (causing, respectively, bacteremia/sepsis, pneumonia, and peritonitis).

The Human Microbiome Project found that individuals host thousands of bacterial types, different body sites having their own distinctive communities. Skin and vaginal sites showed smaller diversity than the mouth and gut, these showing the greatest richness. The bacterial makeup for a given site on a body varies from person to person, not only in type, but also in abundance. Bacteria of the same species found throughout the mouth are of multiple subtypes, preferring to inhabit distinctly different locations in the mouth. Even the enterotypes in the human gut, previously thought to be well understood, are from a broad spectrum of communities with blurred taxon boundaries.[17][18]

It is estimated that 500 to 1,000 species of bacteria live in the human gut but belong to just a few phyla: Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes dominate but there are also Proteobacteria, Verrumicrobia, Actinobacteria, Fusobacteria and Cyanobacteria.[19]

A number of types of bacteria, such as Actinomyces viscosus and A. naeslundii, live in the mouth, where they are part of a sticky substance called plaque. If this is not removed by brushing, it hardens into calculus (also called tartar). The same bacteria also secrete acids that dissolve tooth enamel, causing tooth decay.

The vaginal microflora consist mostly of various lactobacillus species. It was long thought that the most common of these species was Lactobacillus acidophilus, but it has later been shown that L. iners is in fact most common, followed by L. crispatus. Other lactobacilli found in the vagina are L. jensenii, L. delbruekii and L. gasseri. Disturbance of the vaginal flora can lead to infections such as bacterial vaginosis or candidiasis ("yeast infection").

4.2. Archaea

Archaea are present in the human gut, but, in contrast to the enormous variety of bacteria in this organ, the numbers of archaeal species are much more limited.[20] The dominant group are the methanogens, particularly Methanobrevibacter smithii and Methanosphaera stadtmanae.[21] However, colonization by methanogens is variable, and only about 50% of humans have easily detectable populations of these organisms.[22]

As of 2007, no clear examples of archaeal pathogens were known,[23][24] although a relationship has been proposed between the presence of some methanogens and human periodontal disease.[25]

4.3. Fungi

Fungi, in particular yeasts, are present in the human gut.[26][27][28][29] The best-studied of these are Candida species due to their ability to become pathogenic in immunocompromised and even in healthy hosts.[27][28][29] Yeasts are also present on the skin,[26] such as Malassezia species, where they consume oils secreted from the sebaceous glands.[30][31]

4.4. Viruses

Viruses, especially bacterial viruses (bacteriophages), colonize various body sites. These colonized sites include the skin,[32] gut,[33] lungs,[34] and oral cavity.[35] Virus communities have been associated with some diseases, and do not simply reflect the bacterial communities.[36][37][38]

5. Anatomical Areas

5.1. Skin

A study of twenty skin sites on each of ten healthy humans found 205 identified genera in nineteen bacterial phyla, with most sequences assigned to four phyla: Actinobacteria (51.8%), Firmicutes (24.4%), Proteobacteria (16.5%), and Bacteroidetes (6.3%).[39] A large number of fungal genera are present on healthy human skin, with some variability by region of the body; however, during pathological conditions, certain genera tend to dominate in the affected region.[26] For example, Malassezia is dominant in atopic dermatitis and Acremonium is dominant on dandruff-afflicted scalps.[26]

The skin acts as a barrier to deter the invasion of pathogenic microbes. The human skin contains microbes that reside either in or on the skin and can be residential or transient. Resident microorganism types vary in relation to skin type on the human body. A majority of microbes reside on superficial cells on the skin or prefer to associate with glands. These glands such as oil or sweat glands provide the microbes with water, amino acids, and fatty acids. In addition, resident bacteria that associated with oil glands are often Gram-positive and can be pathogenic.[1]

5.2. Conjunctiva

A small number of bacteria and fungi are normally present in the conjunctiva.[26][40] Classes of bacteria include Gram-positive cocci (e.g., Staphylococcus and Streptococcus) and Gram-negative rods and cocci (e.g., Haemophilus and Neisseria) are present.[40] Fungal genera include Candida, Aspergillus, and Penicillium.[26] The lachrymal glands continuously secrete, keeping the conjunctiva moist, while intermittent blinking lubricates the conjunctiva and washes away foreign material. Tears contain bactericides such as lysozyme, so that microorganisms have difficulty in surviving the lysozyme and settling on the epithelial surfaces.

5.3. Gut

{{Annotated image 4 | image = Microbiota-derived 3-Indolepropionic acid-notext.svg | link = Commons:File:Microbiota-derived 3-Indolepropionic acid.svg | header = Tryptophan metabolism by human gastrointestinal microbiota (v · d · e ) | header_align = center | header_background = #F0F8FF | align = right | image-width = 600 | image-left = 0 | image-top = 10 | width = 580 | height = 470 | alt = Tryptophan metabolism diagram | caption = {{{caption|This diagram shows the biosynthesis of bioactive compounds (indole and certain other derivatives) from by bacteria in the gut.[41] Indole is produced from tryptophan by bacteria that express tryptophanase.[41] Clostridium sporogenes metabolizes tryptophan into indole and subsequently 3-indolepropionic acid (IPA),[42] a highly potent neuroprotective antioxidant that scavenges hydroxyl radicals.[41][43][44] IPA binds to the pregnane X receptor (PXR) in intestinal cells, thereby facilitating mucosal homeostasis and barrier function.[41] Following absorption from the intestine and distribution to the brain, IPA confers a neuroprotective effect against cerebral ischemia and Alzheimer's disease.[41] Lactobacillus species metabolize tryptophan into {{when pagename is|Indole-3-carboxaldehyde=indole-3-carboxaldehyde|other=indole-3-aldehyde}} (I3A) which acts on the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) in intestinal immune cells, in turn increasing interleukin-22 (IL-22) production.[41] Indole itself triggers the secretion of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) in intestinal L cells and acts as a ligand for AhR.[41] Indole can also be metabolized by the liver into ]], a compound that is toxic in high concentrations and associated with vascular disease and renal dysfunction.[41] AST-120 (activated charcoal), an intestinal sorbent that is [[Oral administrat[[Physics:taken by mouth,Chemistry:Adsorption|adsorbs i]]ndole, in turn decreasing the concentration of indoxyl sulfate in blood plasma.[41] }}} | annot-font-size = 14 | annot-text-align = left | annotations =

}}

In humans the composition of gut flora is established during birth.[45] Birth by Cesarean section or vaginal delivery also influences the gut's microbial composition. Babies born through the vaginal canal have non-pathogenic, beneficial gut microbiota similar to those found in the mother.[46] However, the gut microbiota of babies delivered by C-section harbors more pathogenic bacteria such as Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus and it takes longer to develop non-pathogenic, beneficial gut microbiota.[47]

The relationship between some gut flora and humans is not merely commensal (a non-harmful coexistence), but rather a mutualistic relationship.[1] Some human gut microorganisms benefit the host by fermentating dietary fiber into short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), such as acetic acid and butyric acid, which are then absorbed by the host.[6][48] Intestinal bacteria also play a role in synthesizing vitamin B and vitamin K as well as metabolizing bile acids, sterols, and xenobiotics.[1][48] The systemic importance of the SCFAs and other compounds they produce are like hormones and the gut flora itself appears to function like an endocrine organ,[48] and dysregulation of the gut flora has been correlated with a host of inflammatory and autoimmune conditions.[6][49]

The composition of human gut flora changes over time, when the diet changes, and as overall health changes.[6][49] A systematic review of 15 human randomized controlled trials from July 2016 found that certain commercially available strains of probiotic bacteria from the Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus genera (B. longum, B. breve, B. infantis, L. helveticus, L. rhamnosus, L. plantarum, and L. casei), when taken by mouth in daily doses of 109–1010 colony forming units (CFU) for 1–2 months, possess treatment efficacy (i.e., improves behavioral outcomes) in certain central nervous system disorders – including anxiety, depression, autism spectrum disorder, and obsessive–compulsive disorder – and improves certain aspects of memory.[50] However, changes in the composition of gut microbiota has also been found to be correlated with harmful effects on health. In an article published by Musso et al., it was found that the gut microbiota of obese invidividuals had more Firmicutes and less Bacteroidetes than healthy individuals.[51] Furthermore, a study done by Gordon et al., confirmed that it was the composition of the microbiota that causes obesity rather than the other way around. This was done by transplanting the gut microbiota from diet-induced obese(DIO) mice or lean control mice into lean germ-free mice that do not have a microbiome. They found that the mice transplanted with DIO mouse gut microbiota had significantly higher total body fat than the mice transplanted with lean mouse microbiota when fed with the same diet.[52]

5.4. Urethra and Bladder

The genitourinary system appears to have a microbiota,[53][54] which is an unexpected finding in light of the long-standing use of standard clinical microbiological culture methods to detect bacteria in urine when people show signs of a urinary tract infection; it is common for these tests to show no bacteria present.[55] It appears that common culture methods do not detect many kinds of bacteria and other microorganisms that are normally present.[55] As of 2017, sequencing methods were used to identify these microorganisms to determine if there are differences in microbiota between people with urinary tract problems and those who are healthy.[53][54]

5.5. Vagina

Vaginal microbiota refers to those species and genera that colonize the vagina. These organisms play an important role in protecting against infections and maintaining vaginal health.[56] The most abundant vaginal microorganisms found in premenopausal women are from the genus Lactobacillus, which suppress pathogens by producing hydrogen peroxide and lactic acid.[28][56][57] Bacterial species composition and ratios vary depending on the stage of the menstrual cycle.[58][59] Ethnicity also influences vaginal flora. The occurrence of hydrogen peroxide-producing lactobacilli is lower in African American women and vaginal pH is higher.[60] Other influential factors such as sexual intercourse and antibiotics have been linked to the loss of lactobacilli.[57] Moreover, studies have found that sexual intercourse with a condom does appear to change lactobacilli levels, and does increase the level of Escherichia coli within the vaginal flora.[57] Changes in the normal, healthy vaginal microbiota is an indication of infections, such as candidiasis or bacterial vaginosis.[57] Candida albicans inhibits the growth of Lactobacillus species, while Lactobacillus species which produce hydrogen peroxide inhibit the growth and virulence of Candida albicans in both the vagina and the gut.[26][28][29]

Fungal genera that have been detected in the vagina include Candida, Pichia, Eurotium, Alternaria, Rhodotorula, and Cladosporium, among others.[26]

5.6. Placenta

Until recently the placenta was considered to be a sterile organ but commensal, nonpathogenic bacterial species and genera have been identified that reside in the placental tissue.[61][62][63]

5.7. Uterus

Until recently, the upper reproductive tract of women was considered to be a sterile environment. A variety of microorganisms inhabit the uterus of healthy, asymptomatic women of reproductive age. The microbiome of the uterus differs significantly from that of the vagina and gastrointestinal tract.[64]

5.8. Oral Cavity

The environment present in the human mouth allows the growth of characteristic microorganisms found there. It provides a source of water and nutrients, as well as a moderate temperature.[1] Resident microbes of the mouth adhere to the teeth and gums to resist mechanical flushing from the mouth to stomach where acid-sensitive microbes are destroyed by hydrochloric acid.[1][28]

Anaerobic bacteria in the oral cavity include: Actinomyces, Arachnia, Bacteroides, Bifidobacterium, Eubacterium, Fusobacterium, Lactobacillus, Leptotrichia, Peptococcus, Peptostreptococcus, Propionibacterium, Selenomonas, Treponema, and Veillonella.[65] Genera of fungi that are frequently found in the mouth include Candida, Cladosporium, Aspergillus, Fusarium, Glomus, Alternaria, Penicillium, and Cryptococcus, among others.[26]

Bacteria accumulate on both the hard and soft oral tissues in biofilm allowing them to adhere and strive in the oral environment while protected from the environmental factors and antimicrobial agents.[66] Saliva plays a key biofilm homeostatic role allowing recolonization of bacteria for formation and controlling growth by detaching biofilm buildup.[67] It also provides a means of nutrients and temperature regulation. The location of the biofilm determines the type of exposed nutrients it receives.[68]

Oral bacteria have evolved mechanisms to sense their environment and evade or modify the host. However, a highly efficient innate host defense system constantly monitors the bacterial colonization and prevents bacterial invasion of local tissues. A dynamic equilibrium exists between dental plaque bacteria and the innate host defense system.[69]

This dynamic between host oral cavity and oral microbes plays a key role in health and disease as it provides entry into the body.[70] A healthy equilibrium presents a symbiotic relationship where oral microbes limit growth and adherence of pathogens while the host provides an environment for them to flourish.[70][66] Ecological changes such as change of immune status, shift of resident microbes and nutrient availability shift from a mutual to parasitic relationship resulting in the host being prone to oral and systemic disease.[66] Systemic diseases such as diabetes and cardiovascular diseases has been correlated to poor oral health.[70] Of particular interest is the role of oral microorganisms in the two major dental diseases: dental caries and periodontal disease.[69] Pathogen colonization at the periodontium cause an excessive immune response resulting in a periodontal pocket- a deepened space between the tooth and gingiva.[66] This acts as a protected blood-rich reservoir with nutrients for anaerobic pathogens.[66] Systemic disease at various sites of the body can result from oral microbes entering the blood bypassing periodontal pockets and oral membranes.[70]

Persistent proper oral hygiene is the primary method for preventing oral and systemic disease.[70] It reduces the density of biofilm and overgrowth of potential pathogenic bacteria resulting in disease.[68] However, proper oral hygiene may not be enough as the oral microbiome, genetics, and changes to immune response play a factor in developing chronic infections.[68] Use of antibiotics could treat already spreading infection but ineffective against bacteria within biofilms.[68]

5.9. Lung

Much like the oral cavity, the upper and lower respiratory system possess mechanical deterrents to remove microbes. Goblet cells produce mucous which traps microbes and moves them out of the respiratory system via continuously moving ciliated epithelial cells.[1] In addition, a bactericidal effect is generated by nasal mucus which contains the enzyme lysozyme.[1] The upper and lower respiratory tract appears to have its own set of microbiota.[71] Pulmonary bacterial microbiota belong to 9 major bacterial genera: Prevotella, Sphingomonas, Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, Fusobacterium, Megasphaera, Veillonella, Staphylococcus, and Streptococcus. Some of the bacteria considered "normal biota" in the respiratory tract can cause serious disease especially in immunocompromised individuals; these include Streptococcus pyogenes, Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Neisseria meningitidis, and Staphylococcus aureus. Fungal genera that compose the pulmonary mycobiome include Candida, Malassezia, Neosartorya, Saccharomyces, and Aspergillus, among others.[26]

Unusual distributions of bacterial and fungal genera in the respiratory tract is observed in people with cystic fibrosis.[26][72] Their bacterial flora often contains antibiotic-resistant and slow-growing bacteria, and the frequency of these pathogens changes in relation to age.[72]

5.10. Biliary Tract

Traditionally the biliary tract has been considered to be normally sterile, and the presence of microorganisms in bile is a marker of pathological process. This assumption was confirmed by failure in allocation of bacterial strains from the normal bile duct. Papers began emerging in 2013 showing that the normal biliary microbiota is a separate functional layer which protects a biliary tract from colonization by exogenous microorganisms.[73]

6. Disease and Death

A symbiotic relationship between the gut microbiota and different bacteria may influence an individual's immune response.[74]

6.1. Cancer

Although cancer is generally a disease of host genetics and environmental factors, microorganisms are implicated in some 20% of human cancers.[75] Particularly for potential factors in colon cancer, bacterial density is one million times higher than in the small intestine, and approximately 12-fold more cancers occur in the colon compared to the small intestine, possibly establishing a pathogenic role for microbiota in colon and rectal cancers.[76] Microbial density may be used as a prognostic tool in assessment of colorectal cancers.[76]

The microbiota may affect carcinogenesis in three broad ways: (i) altering the balance of tumor cell proliferation and death, (ii) regulating immune system function, and (iii) influencing metabolism of host-produced factors, foods and pharmaceuticals.[75] Tumors arising at boundary surfaces, such as the skin, oropharynx and respiratory, digestive and urogenital tracts, harbor a microbiota. Substantial microbe presence at a tumor site does not establish association or causal links. Instead, microbes may find tumor oxygen tension or nutrient profile supportive. Decreased populations of specific microbes or induced oxidative stress may also increase risks.[75][76] Of the around 1030 microbes on earth, ten are designated by the International Agency for Research on Cancer as human carcinogens.[75] Microbes may secrete proteins or other factors directly drive cell proliferation in the host, or may up- or down-regulate the host immune system including driving acute or chronic inflammation in ways that contribute to carcinogenesis.[75]

Concerning the relationship of immune function and development of inflammation, mucosal surface barriers are subject to environmental risks and must rapidly repair to maintain homeostasis. Compromised host or microbiota resiliency also reduce resistance to malignancy, possibly inducing inflammation and cancer. Once barriers are breached, microbes can elicit proinflammatory or immunosuppressive programs through various pathways.[75] For example, cancer-associated microbes appear to activate NF-κΒ signaling within the tumor microenviroment. Other pattern recognition receptors, such as nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain–like receptor (NLR) family members NOD-2, NLRP3, NLRP6 and NLRP12, may play a role in mediating colorectal cancer.[75] Likewise Helicobacter pylori appears to increase the risk of gastric cancer, due to its driving a chronic inflammatory response in the stomach.[75][76]

6.2. Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Inflammatory bowel disease consists of two different diseases: ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease and both of these diseases present with disruptions in the gut microbiota (also known as dysbiosis). This dysbiosis presents itself in the form of decreased microbial diversity in the gut,[77][78] and is correlated to defects in host genes that changes the innate immune response in individuals.[77]

6.3. Human Immunodeficiency Virus

The HIV disease progression influences the composition and function of the gut microbiota, with notable differences between HIV-negative, HIV-positive, and post-ART HIV-positive populations. HIV decreases the integrity of the gut epithelial barrier function by affecting tight junctions. This breakdown allows for translocation across the gut epithelium, which is thought to contribute to increases in inflammation seen in people with HIV.[79]

Vaginal microbiota plays a role in the infectivity of HIV, with an increased risk of infection and transmission when the woman has bacterial vaginosis, a condition characterized by an abnormal balance of vaginal bacteria.[80] The enhanced infectivity is seen with the increase in pro-inflammatory cytokines and CCR5 + CD4+ cells in the vagina. However, a decrease in infectivity is seen with increased levels of vaginal Lactobacillus, which promotes an anti-inflammatory condition.[79]

6.4. Death

With death the microbiome of the living body collapses and a different microbiome named necrobiome establishes itself. Its predictable changes over time are thought to be useful to help determine the time of death.[81][82]

7. Environmental Health

Studies in 2009 questioned whether the decline in biota (including microfauna) as a result of human intervention might impede human health, hospital safety procedures, food product design, and treatments of disease.[83]

The content is sourced from: https://handwiki.org/wiki/Biology:Human_microbiota

References

  1. Quigley, EM (2013). "Gut bacteria in health and disease". Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y) 9 (9): 560–9. PMID 24729765.  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=3983973
  2. American Academy of Microbiology FAQ: Human Microbiome January 2014 http://academy.asm.org/index.php/faq-series/5122-humanmicrobiome
  3. Judah L. Rosner for Microbe Magazine, February 2014. Ten Times More Microbial Cells than Body Cells in Humans? http://www.asmscience.org/content/journal/microbe/10.1128/microbe.9.47.2
  4. Alison Abbott for Nature News. 8 January 2016 Scientists bust myth that our bodies have more bacteria than human cells http://www.nature.com/news/scientists-bust-myth-that-our-bodies-have-more-bacteria-than-human-cells-1.19136
  5. Sender, R; Fuchs, S; Milo, R (January 2016). "Are We Really Vastly Outnumbered? Revisiting the Ratio of Bacterial to Host Cells in Humans". Cell 164 (3): 337–40. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.013. PMID 26824647.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.cell.2016.01.013
  6. NIH Human Microbiome Working Group (2009). "The NIH Human Microbiome Project". Genome Res 19 (12): 2317–2323. doi:10.1101/gr.096651.109. PMID 19819907.  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=2792171
  7. Kuczynski, J. et al (2011). "Experimental and analytical tools for studying the human microbiome". Nature Reviews Genetics 13 (1): 47–58. doi:10.1038/nrg3129. PMID 22179717.  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=5119550
  8. Vestheim, H.; Jarman, S. N. (2008). "Blocking primers to enhance PCR amplification of rare sequences in mixed samples – a case study on prey DNA in Antarctic krill stomachs". Frontiers in Zoology 5: 12. doi:10.1186/1742-9994-5-12. PMID 18638418.  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=2517594
  9. Tap, Julien, et al.; Mondot (2009). "Towards the human intestinal microbiota phylogenetic core". Environmental Microbiology 11 (102): 2574–2584. doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.01982.x. PMID 19601958.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1462-2920.2009.01982.x
  10. Hamady, M.; Knight, R. (2009). "Microbial community profiling for human microbiome projects: Tools, techniques, and challenges". Genome Research 19 (7): 1141–1152. doi:10.1101/gr.085464.108. PMID 19383763.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1101%2Fgr.085464.108
  11. "NIH Human Microbiome Project defines normal bacterial makeup of the body". NIH News. 13 June 2012. http://www.nih.gov/news/health/jun2012/nhgri-13.htm. 
  12. Human Microbiome Project Consortium (2012). "A framework for human microbiome research". Nature 486 (7402): 215–221. doi:10.1038/nature11209. PMID 22699610. Bibcode: 2012Natur.486..215T.  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=3377744
  13. The Human Microbiome Project Consortium (2012). "Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome". Nature 486 (7402): 207–214. doi:10.1038/nature11234. PMID 22699609. Bibcode: 2012Natur.486..207T.  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=3564958
  14. PLoS Human Microbiome Project Collection Manuscript Summaries 13 June 2012 http://www.plos.org/media/press/2012/PLoS_%20HMP_Collection_Manuscript_Summaries.pdf
  15. "Consortium of Scientists Map the Human Body's Bacterial Ecosystem". ucsf.edu. http://www.ucsf.edu/news/2012/06/12149/consortium-scientists-map-human-bodys-bacterial-ecosystem. 
  16. Sommer, F; Bäckhed, F (April 2013). "The gut microbiota—masters of host development and physiology". Nat Rev Microbiol 11 (4): 227–38. doi:10.1038/nrmicro2974. PMID 23435359.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1038%2Fnrmicro2974
  17. "Diversity of the human intestinal microbial flora". Science 308 (5728): 1635–8. 2005. doi:10.1126/science.1110591. PMID 15831718. Bibcode: 2005Sci...308.1635E.  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=1395357
  18. "Cultivable bacterial diversity from the human colon". Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 44 (4): 343–50. 2007. doi:10.1111/j.1472-765X.2007.02129.x. PMID 17397470.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1472-765X.2007.02129.x
  19. "Shared and unique environmental factors determine the ecology of methanogens in humans and rats". Am. J. Gastroenterol. 95 (10): 2872–9. 2000. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.02319.x. PMID 11051362.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1572-0241.2000.02319.x
  20. "Archaea and their potential role in human disease". Infection and Immunity 71 (2): 591–6. 2003. doi:10.1128/IAI.71.2.591-596.2003. PMID 12540534.  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=145348
  21. "Pathogenic archaea: do they exist?". BioEssays 25 (11): 1119–28. 2003. doi:10.1002/bies.10354. PMID 14579252.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fbies.10354
  22. "Methanogenic Archaea and human periodontal disease". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101 (16): 6176–81. 2004. doi:10.1073/pnas.0308766101. PMID 15067114. Bibcode: 2004PNAS..101.6176L.  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=395942
  23. "The human mycobiome in health and disease". Genome Med 5 (7): 63. July 2013. doi:10.1186/gm467. PMID 23899327. "Figure 2: Distribution of fungal genera in different body sites".  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=3978422
  24. "Candidiasis: predisposing factors, prevention, diagnosis and alternative treatment". Mycopathologia 177 (5–6): 223–240. June 2014. doi:10.1007/s11046-014-9749-1. PMID 24789109. "Candida species and other microorganisms are involved in this complicated fungal infection, but Candida albicans continues to be the most prevalent. In the past two decades, it has been observed an abnormal overgrowth in the gastrointestinal, urinary and respiratory tracts, not only in immunocompromised patients, but also related to nosocomial infections and even in healthy individuals. There is a widely variety of causal factors that contribute to yeast infection which means that candidiasis is a good example of a multifactorial syndrome.".  https://dx.doi.org/10.1007%2Fs11046-014-9749-1
  25. "Review article: fungal microbiota and digestive diseases". Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 39 (8): 751–766. April 2014. doi:10.1111/apt.12665. PMID 24612332. "In addition, GI fungal infection is reported even among those patients with normal immune status. Digestive system-related fungal infections may be induced by both commensal opportunistic fungi and exogenous pathogenic fungi. ... Candida sp. is also the most frequently identified species among patients with gastric IFI. ... It was once believed that gastric acid could kill microbes entering the stomach and that the unique ecological environment of the stomach was not suitable for microbial colonisation or infection. However, several studies using culture-independent methods confirmed that large numbers of acid-resistant bacteria belonging to eight phyla and up to 120 species exist in the stomach, such as Streptococcus sp., Neisseria sp. and Lactobacillus sp. etc.26, 27 Furthermore, Candida albicans can grow well in highly acidic environments,28 and some genotypes may increase the severity of gastric mucosal lesions.29".  https://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fapt.12665
  26. "Small intestinal fungal overgrowth". Curr Gastroenterol Rep 17 (4): 16. April 2015. doi:10.1007/s11894-015-0436-2. PMID 25786900. "Small intestinal fungal overgrowth (SIFO) is characterized by the presence of excessive number of fungal organisms in the small intestine associated with gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms. Candidiasis is known to cause GI symptoms particularly in immunocompromised patients or those receiving steroids or antibiotics. However, only recently, there is emerging literature that an overgrowth of fungus in the small intestine of non-immunocompromised subjects may cause unexplained GI symptoms. Two recent studies showed that 26 % (24/94) and 25.3 % (38/150) of a series of patients with unexplained GI symptoms had SIFO. The most common symptoms observed in these patients were belching, bloating, indigestion, nausea, diarrhea, and gas. ... Fungal-bacterial interaction may act in different ways and may either be synergistic or antagonistic or symbiotic [29]. Some bacteria such as Lactobacillus species can interact and inhibit both the virulence and growth of Candida species in the gut by producing hydrogen peroxide [30]. Any damage to the mucosal barrier or disruption of GI microbiota with chemotherapy or antibiotic use, inflammatory processes, activation of immune molecules and disruption of epithelial repair may all cause fungal overgrowth [27].".  https://dx.doi.org/10.1007%2Fs11894-015-0436-2
  27. "Human infections due to Malassezia spp". Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 5 (2): 101–19. 1 April 1992. doi:10.1128/CMR.5.2.101. PMID 1576583. PMC 358230. http://cmr.asm.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=1576583. 
  28. "Microbial ecology of the skin". Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 42 (1): 441–64. 1988. doi:10.1146/annurev.mi.42.100188.002301. PMID 3144238.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1146%2Fannurev.mi.42.100188.002301
  29. Hannigan, Geoffrey D.; Meisel, Jacquelyn S.; Tyldsley, Amanda S.; Zheng, Qi; Hodkinson, Brendan P.; SanMiguel, Adam J.; Minot, Samuel; Bushman, Frederic D. et al. (30 October 2015). "The Human Skin Double-Stranded DNA Virome: Topographical and Temporal Diversity, Genetic Enrichment, and Dynamic Associations with the Host Microbiome" (in en). MBio 6 (5): e01578–15. doi:10.1128/mBio.01578-15. PMID 26489866. PMC 4620475. http://mbio.asm.org/content/6/5/e01578-15. 
  30. Minot, Samuel; Sinha, Rohini; Chen, Jun; Li, Hongzhe; Keilbaugh, Sue A.; Wu, Gary D.; Lewis, James D.; Bushman, Frederic D. (1 October 2011). "The human gut virome: inter-individual variation and dynamic response to diet". Genome Research 21 (10): 1616–1625. doi:10.1101/gr.122705.111. PMID 21880779.  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=3202279
  31. Young, J. C.; Chehoud, C.; Bittinger, K.; Bailey, A.; Diamond, J. M.; Cantu, E.; Haas, A. R.; Abbas, A. et al. (1 January 2015). "Viral metagenomics reveal blooms of anelloviruses in the respiratory tract of lung transplant recipients". American Journal of Transplantation 15 (1): 200–209. doi:10.1111/ajt.13031. PMID 25403800.  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=4276431
  32. Abeles, Shira R.; Robles-Sikisaka, Refugio; Ly, Melissa; Lum, Andrew G.; Salzman, Julia; Boehm, Tobias K.; Pride, David T. (1 September 2014). "Human oral viruses are personal, persistent and gender-consistent" (in en). The ISME Journal 8 (9): 1753–1767. doi:10.1038/ismej.2014.31. PMID 24646696. PMC 4139723. http://www.nature.com/ismej/journal/v8/n9/full/ismej201431a.html. 
  33. Ly, Melissa; Abeles, Shira R.; Boehm, Tobias K.; Robles-Sikisaka, Refugio; Naidu, Mayuri; Santiago-Rodriguez, Tasha; Pride, David T. (1 July 2014). "Altered Oral Viral Ecology in Association with Periodontal Disease" (in en). MBio 5 (3): e01133–14. doi:10.1128/mBio.01133-14. PMID 24846382. PMC 4030452. http://mbio.asm.org/content/5/3/e01133-14. 
  34. Monaco, Cynthia L.; Gootenberg, David B.; Zhao, Guoyan; Handley, Scott A.; Ghebremichael, Musie S.; Lim, Efrem S.; Lankowski, Alex; Baldridge, Megan T. et al. (9 March 2016). "Altered Virome and Bacterial Microbiome in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Associated Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome". Cell Host & Microbe 19 (3): 311–322. doi:10.1016/j.chom.2016.02.011. PMID 26962942.  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=4821831
  35. Norman, Jason M.; Handley, Scott A.; Baldridge, Megan T.; Droit, Lindsay; Liu, Catherine Y.; Keller, Brian C.; Kambal, Amal; Monaco, Cynthia L. et al. (29 January 2015). "Disease-specific alterations in the enteric virome in inflammatory bowel disease". Cell 160 (3): 447–460. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.002. PMID 25619688.  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=4312520
  36. Grice, Elizabeth A.; Kong, HH; Conlan, S; Deming, CB; Davis, J; Young, AC; NISC Comparative Sequencing Program; Bouffard, GG et al. (2006). "Topographical and Temporal Diversity of the Human Skin Microbiome". Science 324 (5931): 1190–2. doi:10.1126/science.1171700. PMID 19478181. Bibcode: 2009Sci...324.1190G.  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=2805064
  37. Sherwood, Linda; Willey, Joanne; Woolverton, Christopher (2013). Prescott's Microbiology (9th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill. pp. 713–721. ISBN 9780073402406. OCLC 886600661. https://books.google.com/books?id=sBCSRAAACAAJ. 
  38. "The Normal Bacterial Flora of Humans". textbookofbacteriology.net. http://www.textbookofbacteriology.net/normalflora_3.html. 
  39. "Microbial metabolism of dietary components to bioactive metabolites: opportunities for new therapeutic interventions". Genome Med 8 (1): 46. April 2016. doi:10.1186/s13073-016-0296-x. PMID 27102537. "Lactobacillus spp. convert tryptophan to indole-3-aldehyde (I3A) through unidentified enzymes [125]. Clostridium sporogenes convert tryptophan to IPA [6], likely via a tryptophan deaminase. ... IPA also potently scavenges hydroxyl radicals". Table 2: Microbial metabolites: their synthesis, mechanisms of action, and effects on health and diseaseFigure 1: Molecular mechanisms of action of indole and its metabolites on host physiology and disease https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4840492/table/Tab2/
  40. "Metabolomics analysis reveals large effects of gut microflora on mammalian blood metabolites". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106 (10): 3698–3703. March 2009. doi:10.1073/pnas.0812874106. PMID 19234110. "Production of IPA was shown to be completely dependent on the presence of gut microflora and could be established by colonization with the bacterium Clostridium sporogenes.". IPA metabolism diagram https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2656143/figure/F2/
  41. "3-Indolepropionic acid". University of Alberta. http://www.hmdb.ca/metabolites/HMDB02302. Retrieved 12 June 2018. "Indole-3-propionate (IPA), a deamination product of tryptophan formed by symbiotic bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract of mammals and birds. 3-Indolepropionic acid has been shown to prevent oxidative stress and death of primary neurons and neuroblastoma cells exposed to the amyloid beta-protein in the form of amyloid fibrils, one of the most prominent neuropathologic features of Alzheimer's disease. 3-Indolepropionic acid also shows a strong level of neuroprotection in two other paradigms of oxidative stress. (PMID 10419516) ... More recently it has been found that higher indole-3-propionic acid levels in serum/plasma are associated with reduced likelihood of type 2 diabetes and with higher levels of consumption of fiber-rich foods (PMID 28397877)Origin:  • Endogenous  • Microbial" 
  42. "Potent neuroprotective properties against the Alzheimer beta-amyloid by an endogenous melatonin-related indole structure, indole-3-propionic acid". J. Biol. Chem. 274 (31): 21937–21942. July 1999. doi:10.1074/jbc.274.31.21937. PMID 10419516. "[Indole-3-propionic acid (IPA)] has previously been identified in the plasma and cerebrospinal fluid of humans, but its functions are not known. ... In kinetic competition experiments using free radical-trapping agents, the capacity of IPA to scavenge hydroxyl radicals exceeded that of melatonin, an indoleamine considered to be the most potent naturally occurring scavenger of free radicals. In contrast with other antioxidants, IPA was not converted to reactive intermediates with pro-oxidant activity.".  https://dx.doi.org/10.1074%2Fjbc.274.31.21937
  43. Yang, Irene; Corwin, Elizabeth J.; Brennan, Patricia A.; Jordan, Sheila; Murphy, Jordan R.; Dunlop, Anne (2016). "The Infant Microbiome". Nursing Research 65 (1): 76–88. doi:10.1097/NNR.0000000000000133. PMID 26657483.  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=4681407
  44. Mueller, Noel T.; Bakacs, Elizabeth; Combellick, Joan; Grigoryan, Zoya; Dominguez-Bello, Maria G. (February 2015). "The infant microbiome development: mom matters". Trends in Molecular Medicine 21 (2): 109–117. doi:10.1016/j.molmed.2014.12.002. PMID 25578246.  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=4464665
  45. Wall, R; Ross, R.P; Ryan, C.A; Hussey, S; Murphy, B; Fitzgerald, G.F; Stanton, C (4 March 2009). "Role of Gut Microbiota in Early Infant Development". Clinical Medicine. Pediatrics 3: 45–54. ISSN 1178-220X. PMID 23818794.  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=3676293
  46. Clarke, G et al. (August 2014). "Minireview: Gut microbiota: the neglected endocrine organ". Mol Endocrinol 28 (8): 1221–38. doi:10.1210/me.2014-1108. PMID 24892638.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1210%2Fme.2014-1108
  47. Shen, S; Wong, CH (2016). "Bugging inflammation: role of the gut microbiota". Clin Transl Immunology 5 (4): e72. doi:10.1038/cti.2016.12. PMID 27195115.  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=4855262
  48. "Effect of probiotics on central nervous system functions in animals and humans – a systematic review". J. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 22 (4): 589–605. July 2016. doi:10.5056/jnm16018. PMID 27413138. "These probiotics showed efficacy in improving psychiatric disorder-related behaviors including anxiety, depression, autism spectrum disorder (ASD), obsessive-compulsive disorder, and memory abilities, including spatial and non-spatial memory. Because many of the basic science studies showed some efficacy of probiotics on central nervous system function, this background may guide and promote further preclinical and clinical studies. ... According to the qualitative analyses of current studies, we can provisionally draw the conclusion that B. longum, B. breve, B. infantis, L. helveticus, L. rhamnosus, L. plantarum, and L. casei were most effective in improving CNS function, including psychiatric disease-associated functions (anxiety, depression, mood, stress response) and memory abilities".  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=5056568
  49. Musso, G.; Gambino, R.; Cassader, M. (28 September 2010). "Obesity, Diabetes, and Gut Microbiota: The hygiene hypothesis expanded?". Diabetes Care 33 (10): 2277–2284. doi:10.2337/dc10-0556.  https://dx.doi.org/10.2337%2Fdc10-0556
  50. Turnbaugh, Peter J.; Bäckhed, Fredrik; Fulton, Lucinda; Gordon, Jeffrey I. (April 2008). "Diet-Induced Obesity Is Linked to Marked but Reversible Alterations in the Mouse Distal Gut Microbiome". Cell Host & Microbe 3 (4): 213–223. doi:10.1016/j.chom.2008.02.015.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.chom.2008.02.015
  51. Drake, MJ; Morris, N; Apostolidis, A; Rahnama'i, MS; Marchesi, JR (April 2017). "The urinary microbiome and its contribution to lower urinary tract symptoms". Neurourology and Urodynamics 36 (4): 850–853. doi:10.1002/nau.23006. PMID 28444712.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1002%2Fnau.23006
  52. Aragón, IM; Herrera-Imbroda, B; Queipo-Ortuño, MI; Castillo, E; Del Moral, JS; Gómez-Millán, J; Yucel, G; Lara, MF (January 2018). "The Urinary Tract Microbiome in Health and Disease.". European Urology Focus 4 (1): 128–138. doi:10.1016/j.euf.2016.11.001. PMID 28753805.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.euf.2016.11.001
  53. Schmiemann, G; Kniehl, E; Gebhardt, K; Matejczyk, M. M; Hummers-Pradier, E (2010). "The Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infection: A Systematic Review". Deutsches Aerzteblatt Online 107 (21): 361–367. doi:10.3238/arztebl.2010.0361.  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=2883276
  54. Petrova, Mariya I.; Lievens, Elke; Malik, Shweta; Imholz, Nicole; Lebeer, Sarah (2015). "Lactobacillus species as biomarkers and agents that can promote various aspects of vaginal health". Frontiers in Physiology 6. doi:10.3389/fphys.2015.00081.  https://dx.doi.org/10.3389%2Ffphys.2015.00081
  55. Witkin, S. S.; Linhares, I. M.; Giraldo, P. (2007). "Bacterial flora of the female genital tract: Function and immune regulation". Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology 21 (3): 347–354. doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.12.004. PMID 17215167.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.bpobgyn.2006.12.004
  56. Todar, Kenneth (2012). "The Normal Bacterial Flora of Humans". Todar's Online Textbook of Bacteriology. Madison, WI: Kenneth Todar. http://textbookofbacteriology.net/normalflora_3.html. Retrieved 6 April 2012. 
  57. Onderdonk, A. B.; Zamarchi, G. R.; Walsh, J. A.; Mellor, R. D.; Muñoz, A.; Kass, E. H. (1986). "Methods for quantitative and qualitative evaluation of vaginal microflora during menstruation". Applied and Environmental Microbiology 51 (2): 333–339. PMID 3954346.  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=238869
  58. Antonio, M. A. D.; Hawes, S. E.; Hillier, S. L. (1999). "The Identification of VaginalLactobacillusSpecies and the Demographic and Microbiologic Characteristics of Women Colonized by These Species". The Journal of Infectious Diseases 180 (6): 1950–1956. doi:10.1086/315109. PMID 10558952.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1086%2F315109
  59. Fox, Chelsea; Eichelberger, Kacey (2015). "Maternal microbiome and pregnancy outcomes". Fertility and Sterility 104 (6): 1358–1363. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.09.037. PMID 26493119.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.fertnstert.2015.09.037
  60. Wassenaar, T.M.; Panigrahi, P. (2014). "Is a foetus developing in a sterile environment?". Letters in Applied Microbiology 59 (6): 572–579. doi:10.1111/lam.12334. PMID 25273890.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Flam.12334
  61. Schwiertz, Andreas (2016). Microbiota of the human body : implications in health and disease. Switzerland: Springer. p. 1. ISBN 978-3-319-31248-4. 
  62. Franasiak, Jason M.; Scott, Richard T. (2015). "Reproductive tract microbiome in assisted reproductive technologies". Fertility and Sterility 104 (6): 1364–1371. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.10.012. PMID 26597628.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.fertnstert.2015.10.012
  63. Sutter, V. L. (1984). "Anaerobes as normal oral flora". Reviews of infectious diseases 6 Suppl 1: S62–S66. doi:10.1093/clinids/6.Supplement_1.S62. PMID 6372039.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1093%2Fclinids%2F6.Supplement_1.S62
  64. Purnima, Kumar (December 2013). "Oral microbiota and systemic disease". Anaerobe 24: 90–93. doi:10.1016/j.anaerobe.2013.09.010. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075996413001625?_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_origin=gateway&_docanchor=&md5=b8429449ccfc9c30159a5f9aeaa92ffb&ccp=y. Retrieved 19 November 2017. 
  65. Arweiler, Nicole B.; Netuschil, Lutz (May 2016). "The Oral Microbiota". in Andreas Schwiertz. Microbiota of the Human Body: Implications in Health and Disease. Springer,Cham. pp. 45–60. ISBN 978-3-319-31248-4. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-319-31248-4_4. 
  66. Avila, Maria; Ojcius, David M.; Yilmaz, Özlem (2009). "The Oral Microbiota: Living with a Permanent Guest". DNA and Cell Biology 28 (8): 405–411. doi:10.1089/dna.2009.0874. ISSN 1044-5498.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1089%2Fdna.2009.0874
  67. Rogers A H (editor). (2008). Molecular Oral Microbiology. Caister Academic Press. ISBN 978-1-904455-24-0. 
  68. Zarco, MF; Vess, TJ; Ginsburg, GS (2012). "The oral microbiome in health and disease and the potential impact on personalized dental medicine". Oral Diseases 18 (2): 109–120. doi:10.1111/j.1601-0825.2011.01851.x. ISSN 1354-523X.  https://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1601-0825.2011.01851.x
  69. "The microbiota of the respiratory tract: gatekeeper to respiratory health". Nature Reviews Microbiology 15 (5): 259–270. 2017. doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2017.14. PMID 28316330. http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/nrmicro.2017.14. 
  70. Beringer, P M; M D Appleman (November 2000). "Unusual respiratory bacterial flora in cystic fibrosis: microbiologic and clinical features". Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine 6 (6): 545–550. doi:10.1097/00063198-200011000-00015. PMID 11100967. Archived from the original on 16 October 2013. https://web.archive.org/web/20131016102359/http://www.usc.edu/hsc/pharmacy/pd_labs/COPM11-00.pdf. 
  71. Verdier, J; Luedde, T; Sellge, G (June 2015). "Biliary Mucosal Barrier and Microbiome.". Viszeralmedizin 31 (3): 156–61. doi:10.1159/000431071. PMID 26468308.  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=4569210
  72. Honda, Kenya; Littman, Dan R. (7 July 2016). "The microbiota in adaptive immune homeostasis and disease" (in en). Nature 535 (7610): 75–84. doi:10.1038/nature18848. PMID 27383982. Bibcode: 2016Natur.535...75H. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v535/n7610/full/nature18848.html. 
  73. Garrett, WS (3 April 2015). "Cancer and the microbiota". Science 348 (6230): 80–6. doi:10.1126/science.aaa4972. PMID 25838377. Bibcode: 2015Sci...348...80G.  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=5535753
  74. Gagnière, J; Raisch, J; Veziant, J; Barnich, N; Bonnet, R; Buc, E; Bringer, M. A.; Pezet, D et al. (2016). "Gut microbiota imbalance and colorectal cancer". World Journal of Gastroenterology 22 (2): 501–518. doi:10.3748/wjg.v22.i2.501. PMID 26811603.  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=4716055
  75. Sartor, R. Balfour; Mazmanian, Sarkis K. (July 2012). "Intestinal Microbes in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases" (in en). The American Journal of Gastroenterology Supplements 1 (1): 15–21. doi:10.1038/ajgsup.2012.4. http://www.nature.com/ajgsup/journal/v1/n1/full/ajgsup20124a.html. 
  76. Hold, Georgina L; Smith, Megan; Grange, Charlie; Watt, Euan Robert; El-Omar, Emad M; Mukhopadhya, Indrani (7 February 2014). "Role of the gut microbiota in inflammatory bowel disease pathogenesis: What have we learnt in the past 10 years?". World Journal of Gastroenterology 20 (5): 1192–1210. doi:10.3748/wjg.v20.i5.1192. PMID 24574795.  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=3921503
  77. Zilberman-Schapira, Gili; Zmora, Niv; Itav, Shlomik; Bashiardes, Stavros; Elinav, Hila; Elinav, Eran (2016). "The gut microbiome in human immunodeficiency virus infection". BMC Medicine 14 (1): 83. doi:10.1186/s12916-016-0625-3. PMID 27256449.  http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=4891875
  78. Petrova, Mariya I.; van den Broek, Marianne; Balzarini, Jan; Vanderleyden, Jos; Lebeer, Sarah (1 September 2013). "Vaginal microbiota and its role in HIV transmission and infection". FEMS Microbiology Reviews 37 (5): 762–792. doi:10.1111/1574-6976.12029. https://academic.oup.com/femsre/article/37/5/762/542986/Vaginal-microbiota-and-its-role-in-HIV. 
  79. Christopher Intagliata (22 December 2016). ""Necrobiome" Reveals a Corpse's Time of Death". Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/podcast/episode/necrobiome-reveals-a-corpses-time-of-death/. Retrieved 26 March 2018. 
  80. Ed Young (10 December 2015). Meet the Necrobiome: The Waves of Microbes That Will Eat Your Corpse. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2015/12/meet-the-necrobiome-the-predictable-microbes-that-will-eat-your-dying-corpse/419676/. Retrieved 26 March 2018. 
  81. Katherine Harmon (16 December 2009). "Bugs Inside: What Happens When the Microbes That Keep Us Healthy Disappear?". Scientific American. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=human-microbiome-change. Retrieved 27 December 2008. 
More
©Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons-Attribution ShareAlike (CC BY-SA) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!
ScholarVision Creations
Feedback