Strain Study of Cuprate Superconductors: History
View Latest Version
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Contributor:
Jian Zhang
,
Haiyan Wu
,
Guangzhen Zhao
,
Lu Han
,
Jun Zhang

Cuprate superconductors have attracted extensive attention due to their broad promising application prospects. Among the factors affecting superconductivity, the effect of strain cannot be ignored, which can significantly enhance or degrade superconductivity. The method of strain application, measurement techniques, and influences in detail are described.

  • cuprate superconductors
  • lattice mismatch
  • strain
  • heterointerface

1. Introduction

Superconductors have two defining properties: (1) vanishing of electrical resistivity below a critical transition temperature (Tc) and (2) expulsion of magnetic flux below a critical field (Hc). The former was discovered by Kamerlingh–Onnes in 1911, and the latter by Meissner and Ochsenfeld in 1933. YBa2Cu3O7−δ (YBCO) was the first discovered superconductor that has Tc above the liquid N2 temperature (77 K) [1]. YBCO’s discovery fueled a great deal of research activity in superconductivity. Initially, most research focused on developing superconductors with a higher Tc and critical current density (Jc). Subsequently, other superconductors such as HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8+δ [2] (HgBCCO), Tl2Ba2Ca2Cu3O10+δ [3] (TlBCCO), and Bi2Sr2Ca2Cu3O10+δ [4] (BSCCO) have also been discovered that had Tcs above 77 K. Since the common property of all these materials was the layered crystal structure that contained one or more CuO2 planes, they were called “cuprates”, which are structurally, chemically, and/or electronically inhomogeneous at the nanoscale.
It is believed that high–temperature superconductors (HTSs) are most suitable for fabricating a lot of potential applications, including motors, magnetic and flywheel energy storage systems, wind generators, magnetic resonance image (MRI), fault current limiters, filters, superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs), and so on [5][6][7]. The field of applied, technological superconductivity is now moving beyond these preliminary demonstrators to the industrial development of commercially viable machines and devices. Strain is a key parameter for understanding many physical phenomena at the nanoscale. The mechanical and electronic properties of a material are directly related to the strain in the material, and the response of a material to an applied strain is fundamental to the engineering of mechanical or electronic properties. Superconducting performance is strongly influenced by strain, which is an unexpected phenomenon [8]. Researchers have spent a considerable amount of time investigating the strain to gain a deeper understanding of its relationship with the film’s superconducting performance [9]. For La1.9Sr0.1CuO4 superconducting films deposited on LaSrAlO4 substrates, the compressive epitaxial strain caused by lattice mismatch doubled Tc [10]. Researchers have observed that anomalous strain fields surrounding misfit dislocations can change the functional properties of oxide heterointerface structures [11][12]. A decrease in Jc with increasing axial tension or compression in self-field has also been observed in YBCO [13][14][15]. It has been shown in theoretical studies that modulating the heterointerface strain can either improve [16][17][18] or demolish the superconductivity [19]. Therefore, the widespread application of HTSs requires an in-depth understanding of the relationship between composition, functionality, and microstructure.

2. Strain Measurement Techniques

At present, the strain measurement techniques for HTS are relatively mature, mainly including X-ray diffraction (XRD)/ Transmission electron microscope (TEM)/Raman/Neutron Diffraction/Electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD), etc. In this section, researchers briefly summarize the relevant applications in strain studies of superconductors.

2.1. XRD

Jingfeng Yu et al. [20] investigated YBCO films prepared on (LaAlO3)0.3-(Sr2AlTaO6)0.7 (LSAT), SrTiO3, and LaAlO3 substrates, and the corresponding influence on superconductivity. Internal strain and residual stress were measured by an extended small-angle sin2ψ method and the Williamson-Hall plot method, respectively. It was confirmed that YBCO/LaAlO3 samples exhibited compressive stress, but YBCO/LSAT and YBCO/SrTiO3 samples exhibited tensile stress. The results of their study demonstrated that Tc had the same variation trend as strain. They suggested that controlling adequate microscopic internal strain and macroscopic residual stress are critical to tailoring microstructures and superconductivity.
Ziliang Li et al. [21] studied the superconducting properties and microstructure of chemical solution deposited (CSD) YBCO films by XRD measurements and magnetic susceptibility. With film thickness decreasing down to 5 nm, the effect of Y2Ba4Cu8O16 intergrowth in films was revealed. Ultrathin films offer a unique opportunity to investigate the superconducting properties of highly concentrated nanoscale defects due to the elastic energy related to the misfit strain. Their results demonstrated that superconducting volume decreased strongly correlated with intergrowth volume fraction increasing. Furthermore, they proved that these intergrowths were non-superconducting nanoscale regions that suppressed Cooper pair formation, supporting their role as vortex pining in YBCO films and coated conductors.

2.2. Neutron Diffraction

Kozo Osamura et al. [22] precisely investigated the strain of YBCO coated conductors and their corresponding effect on critical current (Ic). The internal strain of the YBCO layer was characterized at 77 K by the neutron diffraction technique. The force-free strain (Aff) is defined as the point in the YBCO layer at which the internal uniaxial stress becomes zero, where the initial compressive strain decreases during tensile loading and changes to a tensile component. The Aff was assessed to be about 0.19 ~ 0.21% at 77 K. A uniaxial tensile load was used to measure Ic at 77 K. Ic maximum was observed at 0.035% for the strain dependence. As a result, YBCO-coated conductors’ strain at the maximum Ic does not correlate with their Aff.

2.3. Raman Spectroscopy

Currently, Raman spectroscopy has been used to probe phonons and other types of low-energy excitations in HTS, which can be applied to analyze internal strains and evaluate possible oxygen loss. For example, Sofia Favre et al. [23] deposited YBCO films by Pulsed Laser Deposition (PLD) and studied the connection between superconductivity and strain. They also studied oxygen loss effects and strain by Raman spectroscopy. The films exhibited an in-plane residual compressive strain, whose degree was determined by film thickness and growth conditions, which influenced the superconductivity. An explanation for the nearly linear depression of Tc with c-axis expansion has been proposed using mutual Coulomb screening between consecutive CuO2 planes in the structure.

2.4. EBSD

Anjela Koblischka-Veneva et al. [24] performed a meticulous analysis of transmission Kikuchi diffraction (TKD) and electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) data acquired on various YBCO samples doped with Y2BaCuO5 (Y-211) nanoparticles. The crystallographic parameter difference between Y-211 and YBCO will introduce residual strain around such embedded Y-211 nanoparticles within the YBCO matrix down to the nanometer scale. Researchers found that the strain around clusters and Y-211 nanoparticles was so large that subgrains formed in YBCO matrix. In addition, they discussed the effect of strain distribution on vortex pinning because stress or strain can provide another source of vortex pinning.

2.5. TEM

Currently, TEM has been widely applied in the field of microscale strain measurement, and the strain of various materials has been well studied. In previous research, the authors analyzed the heterointerface structure and strain of Bi-based HTS films deposited on SrTiO3 [25] and MgO [26] single crystal substrates and demonstrated that the combined effect of lattice mismatch and thermal expansion mismatch caused HTS films to behave differently from the expected strain state (expected tensile strain, but actually compressive strain).
In general, four main TEM techniques have been created to measure strain, including high-resolution (S)TEM [25][26][27][28][29][30], nanobeam electron diffraction (NBED) [31][32], convergent-beam electron diffraction (CBED) [33] and dark-field electron holography (DFEH) [34]. Strain measurements depend on their spatial resolution for precision and accuracy. As spatial resolution increases, the technique becomes less accurate. The corresponding information is shown in Table 1. For a specific discussion, see previous reviews, e.g., Martin J. Hÿtch et al. [35], David Cooper et al. [36], and A. Béché et al. [37].
Table 1. Comparison of TEM strain measurement techniques.
Technique Precision Spatial Resolution Field of View Advantages Disadvantages
HR-(S)TEM 10−3 1 ~ 2 nm 150 × 150 nm High availability Demanding specimen preparation and limited in field of view
NBED 10−3 5 ~ 10 nm — Practical and versatile Low spatial resolution
CBED 2 × 10−4 0.5 ~ 2 nm — Most accurate technique Easily interfered by bending atomic columns
DFEH 2 × 10−4 2 ~ 4 nm 1500 × 500 nm Largest view areas Low spatial resolution

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/nano12193340

References

  1. Wu, M.K.; Ashburn, J.R.; Torng, C.J.; Hor, P.H.; Meng, R.L.; Gao, L.; Huang, Z.J.; Wang, Y.Q.; Chu, C.W. Superconductivity at 93 K in a new mixed-phase Y-Ba-Cu-O compound system at ambient pressure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1987, 58, 908–910.
  2. Schilling, A.; Cantoni, M.; Guo, J.D.; Ott, H.R. Superconductivity above 130 K in the Hg-Ba-Ca-Cu-O system. Nature 1993, 363, 56–58.
  3. Parkin, S.S.P.; Lee, V.Y.; Engler, E.M.; Nazzal, A.I.; Huang, T.C.; Gorman, G.; Savoy, R.; Beyers, R. Bulk superconductivity at 125 K in Tl2Ca2Ba2Cu3Ox. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1988, 60, 2539–2542.
  4. Maeda, H.; Tanaka, Y.; Fukutomi, M.; Asano, T. A New High-Tc Oxide Superconductor without a Rare Earth Element. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 1988, 27, L209–L210.
  5. Klein, N. High-frequency applications of high-temperature superconductor thin films. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2002, 65, 1387–1425.
  6. Simsek, Y.; Vlasko-Vlasov, V.; Koshelev, A.E.; Benseman, T.; Hao, Y.; Kesgin, I.; Claus, H.; Pearson, J.; Kwok, W.K.; Welp, U. Thick Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ films grown by liquid-phase epitaxy for Josephson THz applications. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 2018, 31, 015009.
  7. Koch, R.H.; Umbach, C.P.; Clark, G.J.; Chaudhari, P.; Laibowitz, R.B. Quantum interference devices made from superconducting oxide thin films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1987, 51, 200–202.
  8. Zeljkovic, I.; Nieminen, J.; Huang, D.; Chang, T.R.; He, Y.; Jeng, H.T.; Xu, Z.; Wen, J.; Gu, G.; Lin, H.; et al. Nanoscale interplay of strain and doping in a high-temperature superconductor. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 6749–6753.
  9. Foltyn, S.R.; Wang, H.; Civale, L.; Maiorov, B.; Jia, Q.X. The role of interfacial defects in enhancing the critical current density of YBa2Cu3O7−δ coatings. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 2009, 22, 125002–125005.
  10. Locquet, J.-P.; Perret, J.; Fompeyrine, J.; Mächler, E.; Seo, J.W.; Tendeloo, G.V. Doubling the critical temperature of La1.9Sr0.1CuO4 using epitaxial strain. Nature 1998, 194, 453–456.
  11. Bagués, N.; Santiso, J.; Esser, B.D.; Williams, R.E.A.; McComb, D.W.; Konstantinovic, Z.; Balcells, L.; Sandiumenge, F. The misfit dislocation core phase in complex oxide heteroepitaxy. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1704437.
  12. Arredondo, M.; Ramasse, Q.M.; Weyland, M.; Mahjoub, R.; Vrejoiu, I.; Hesse, D.; Browning, N.D.; Alexe, M.; Munroe, P.; Nagarajan, V. Direct Evidence for Cation Non-Stoichiometry and Cottrell Atmospheres Around Dislocation Cores in Functional Oxide Interfaces. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 2430–2434.
  13. Sugano, M.; Shikimachi, K.; Hirano, N.; Nagaya, S. The reversible strain effect on critical current over a wide range of temperatures and magnetic fields for YBCO coated conductors. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 2010, 23, 085013.
  14. Sugano, M.; Nakamura, T.; Manabe, T.; Shikimachi, K.; Hirano, N.; Nagaya, S. The intrinsic strain effect on critical current under a magnetic field parallel to the c axis for a MOCVD-YBCO-coated conductor. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 2008, 21, 115019.
  15. Cheggour, N.; Ekin, J.W.; Clickner, C.C.; Verebelyi, D.T.; Thieme, C.L.H.; Feenstra, R.; Goyal, A. Reversible axial-strain effect and extended strain limits in Y-Ba-Cu-O coatings on deformation-textured substrates. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2003, 83, 4223–4225.
  16. Pavarini, E.; Dasgupta, I.; Saha-Dasgupta, T.; Jepsen, O.; KAndersen, O. Band-structure trend in hole-doped cuprates and correlation with Tc max. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, 87, 047003.
  17. Bergman, D.L.; Pereg-Barnea, T. The origin of Tc enhancement in heterostructure cuprate superconductors. Materials 2011, 4, 1835–1845.
  18. Ohta, Y.; Tohyama, T.; Maekawa, S. Apex oxygen and critical temperature in copper oxide superconductors: Universal correlation with the stability of local singlets. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 1991, 43, 2968–2982.
  19. Mori, M.; Khaliullin, G.; Tohyama, T.; Maekawa, S. Origin of spatial variation of pairing gap in Bi-based high-Tc cuprates. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 101, 3382–3390.
  20. Yu, J.; Li, F.; Fan, J.; Muhammad, S.; Dahal, Y.P.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, S. Macroscopic residual stress and properties in different YBa2Cu3O7-x heterogeneous systems. Phys. C Supercond. Its Appl. 2020, 577, 1353728.
  21. Li, Z.; Coll, M.; Mundet, B.; Palau, A.; Puig, T.; Obradors, X. Suppression of superconductivity at the nanoscale in chemical solution derived YBa2Cu3O7−δ thin films with defective Y2Ba4Cu8O16 intergrowths. Nanoscale Adv. 2020, 2, 3384–3393.
  22. Osamura, K.; Machiya, S.; Tsuchiya, Y.; Suzuki, H. Force free strain exerted on a YBCO layer at 77 K in surround Cu stabilized YBCO coated conductors. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 2010, 23, 045020.
  23. Favre, S.; Ariosa, D.; Yelpo, C.; Mazini, M.; Faccio, R. Depression of critical temperature due to residual strain induced by PLD deposition on YBa2Cu3O7-δ thin films. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2021, 266, 124507.
  24. Koblischka-Veneva, A.; Koblischka, M.R. Residual Stress/Strain Analysis of Bulk YBCO Superconductors Using EBSD. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 2022, 32, 1–5.
  25. Zhang, J.; Wang, W.; Wang, T.; Jiang, L.; Wang, N.; Dai, Y.; Wang, M.; Qi, Y. Atomic-scale analysis of the interface structure and lattice mismatch relaxation of Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ/SrTiO3 heterostructure. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 8722–8727.
  26. Zhang, J.; Wang, W.; Wang, N.; Wang, M.; Qi, Y. Atomic-resolution study on the interface structure and strain state reversion of the Bi2Sr2CuO6+δ/MgO heterostructure. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 2021, 592, 291–295.
  27. Wang, Y.; Liu, X.P.; Qin, G.W. Strain analysis of misfit dislocations in α-Fe2O3/α-Al2O3 heterostructure interface by geometric phase analysis. Micron 2015, 69, 21–24.
  28. Hÿtch, M.J.; Snoeck, E.; Kilaas, R. Quantitative measurement of displacement and strain fields from HREM micrographs. Ultramicroscopy 1998, 74, 131–146.
  29. Bierwolf, R.; Hohenstein, M.; Phillipp, F.; Brandt, O.; Crook, G.E.; Ploog, K. Direct measurement of local lattice distortions in strained layer structures by HREM. Ultramicroscopy 1993, 49, 273–285.
  30. Zhu, Y.; Ophus, C.; Ciston, J.; Wang, H. Interface lattice displacement measurement to 1 pm by geometric phase analysis on aberration-corrected HAADF STEM images. Acta Materialia 2013, 61, 5646–5663.
  31. Uesugi, F.; Hokazono, A.; Takeno, S. Evaluation of two-dimensional strain distribution by STEM/NBD. Ultramicroscopy 2011, 111, 995–998.
  32. Usuda, K.; Numata, T.; Irisawa, T.; Hirashita, N.; Takagi, S. Strain characterization in SOI and strained-Si on SGOI MOSFET channel using nano-beam electron diffraction (NBD). Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2005, 124–125, 143–147.
  33. Armigliato, A.; Balboni, R.; Carnevale, G.P.; Pavia, G.; Piccolo, D.; Frabboni, S.; Benedetti, A.; Cullis, A.G. Application of convergent beam electron diffraction to two-dimensional strain mapping in silicon devices. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2003, 82, 2172–2174.
  34. Hÿtch, M.; Houdellier, F.; Hüe, F.; Snoeck, E. Nanoscale holographic interferometry for strain measurements in electronic devices. Nature 2008, 453, 1086–1089.
  35. Hÿtch, M.J.; Minor, A.M. Observing and measuring strain in nanostructures and devices with transmission electron microscopy. MRS Bull. 2014, 39, 138–146.
  36. Cooper, D.; Denneulin, T.; Bernier, N.; Beche, A.; Rouviere, J.L. Strain mapping of semiconductor specimens with nm-scale resolution in a transmission electron microscope. Micron 2016, 80, 145–165.
  37. Beche, A.; Rouviere, J.L.; Barnes, J.P.; Cooper, D. Strain measurement at the nanoscale: Comparison between convergent beam electron diffraction, nano-beam electron diffraction, high resolution imaging and dark field electron holography. Ultramicroscopy 2013, 131, 10–23.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!
Video Production Service
Feedback