Biochar in the Development of Electrochemical Printed Platforms: History
View Latest Version
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Contributor:
Rocco Cancelliere
,
Miriam Cianciaruso
,
Katya Carbone
,
Laura Micheli

Biochar is a pyrolytic material with several environmental benefits such as reducing greenhouse gas emissions, sequestering atmospheric carbon and contrasting global warming. It has moved to the forefront for its conductivity and electron transfer properties, finding applications in the fabrication of electrochemical platforms. In this field, researchers have focused on low-cost biomass capable of replacing more popular and expensive carbonaceous nanomaterials (i.e., graphene, nanotubes and quantum dots) in the realization of sensitive cost-effectiveness and eco-friendly electrochemical tools. 

  • biochar-modified screen-printed devices
  • sustainable sensors
  • eco-friendly materials

1. Introduction

With the continuous progress in technology, understanding carbon nanomaterials (CNMs) has reached a new level of interest. Their excellent electrical conductivity, stability, potential high-throughput screening and easy-to-use assay procedure make these compounds suitable for the fabrication of realizing sensors and energy storage devices [1][2]. The production of carbon nanostructures has greatly increased the use of these devices, creating a wide range of applications based on their use, ranging from the creation of miniaturized printed electrodes to the development of flexible electronic devices, humidity sensors or passive sampling systems [3][4][5]. Until now, several electronic and electrochemical tools are developed and applied at the lab scale. Nevertheless, to allow the deployment of these technologies on a large scale, it is necessary for a cost-production reduction and their actual health safety. In addition, CNMs are rather energy-intensive and expensive and require long syntheses, and studies on their toxicity are not yet concluded [6]. For example, activated carbon is conventionally derived from coal, while CNMs such as carbon nanotubes and graphene can be produced through specific techniques (i.e., chemical vapor deposition, electric arc discharge, etc.) using gaseous petrochemicals (i.e., methane, acetylene, ethylene, hydrogen, etc.) at high temperatures (>800 °C) [7]. These high-temperature and resource-intensive processes can be suitable for large-scale production in industrial settings but are not compliable with a fully sustainable solution or production in smaller installations. Alternative eco-friendly carbon material, produced at low cost, competes to replace CNMs, widely used at the industrial level [8]. Recently, attention is being focalized on green recycling carbon material, called biochar. The latter is an inexpensive, solid, recycling carbonaceous material obtained by pyrolysis of renewable sources (i.e., wood chips and pellets, bark, straw, walnut shells and rice husks, bagasse, sewage sludge, etc.) [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16], and its production requires a lower overall energy input than activated carbon, resulting in lower net energy consumption with a low net cost. Its morphological and physicochemical properties can strongly vary with the feedstock source choice and the conditions of the pyrolysis treatment [17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. In addition, the high porosity combined with its surface being rich in functional groups on one side and its excellent electrical conductivity and biocompatibility on the other expand its applications in different fields. A schematic representation of biochar’s applications and its most exploited qualities is reported in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Chemical–physical properties of biochar and its application in the development of electrochemical SPEs-based biosensors.
Until a few years ago, biochar has been used in a large number of applications such as adsorbent for wastewater treatment and agronomic applications (i.e., immobilizing organic and inorganic pollutants), or as an amendment in agricultural soils (effects on soil, agricultural yields, and nitrogen leaching and emissions) [18][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. However, recently, its potential as an eco-friendly and smart nanomaterial for several electrochemical applications is increasingly exploited [27]. In 2015, Joseph et al. reported the redox properties of different biochar, which are rich in carbon (amorphous and graphitic C, labile organic compounds, and minerals) in this regard [28]. In particular, they underlined that the electrochemical properties of biochar are a function of the concentration and composition of the various redox-active minerals and organic compounds and, at the same time, of their production method [29][30]. Many electrochemical studies, present in the literature, reported the use of biochar as a surface modifier of electrodes (i.e., carbon paste, glassy carbon, etc.) [31][32][33], but only a few of them concern SPEs [34][35][36]. Precisely with that in mind, the present work aims to illustrate the recent applications of biochar as a sustainable nanomaterial for electrochemical applications in the field of SPEs. Before all else, its capabilities to act as an electrochemical enhancer (improving the electron transfer process when used for the modification of SPEs), as a booster of the active surface area of the electrodes and as a protein binding substrate (i.e., enzyme, antibody, etc.) in the production of biosensors were carefully studied and discussed [37].

2. Application of Biochar in Electrochemical Platforms

Since the application of biochar as a soil conditioner, catalyst and carbon sequester has been successfully reported, other strategies based on this recycling material to promote sensors with improved analytical performances continue to be widely studied today. In 2020, an inspiring review about sustainable materials for the design of sensors, reporting how the pyrolysis and activation process can affect biochar features, was published [38]. Here, different applications of biochar underlining the potentiality and the promising features of these carbonaceous and recycled materials for electrochemical applications have been reported (Figure 2). In Figure 2, a general scheme for the modification of screen-printed and bulk electrodes using biochar is reported. Moreover, a few examples of works reported in the literature are discussed below.
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the steps involved in the fabrication of biochar-modified electrodes.

2.1. Carbon-Paste and Glassy-Carbon Electrodes

In recent years, an increasing number of publications were centered on biochar-modified glassy-carbon electrodes (GCEs) and carbon paste electrodes (CPEs) [39][40][41][42][43][44]. In these papers, biochar was used for its adsorbent properties and as a highly effective electrode modifier for the pre-concentration of organic contaminants. In these studies, the porous surface of biochar, rich in chemical groups (i.e., carboxyl, hydroxyl, phenolic groups, etc.), which can interact in several ways with the target analytes, was exploited for the pre-concentration and voltammetric determinations of inorganic ions and organic species [42][45][46][47]. Another interesting use of biochar is that in which it was deposited alone or decorated with metallic nanoparticles (i.e., mercury, bismuth, gold, etc.) or electrocatalytic potential nanostructures (i.e., nickel hydroxide, copper hexacyanoferrate, etc.) for the construction of a powerful electrochemical sensor. These methods, based on voltammetric procedures (i.e., stripping, differential pulse, square wave voltammetry, etc.), have provided significant improvement in the performances (sensitivity and selectivity) of the sensor developed. Table 1 reports significant works in which biochar-modified CPE and GCE were used. In these works, biochar was exploited to electrochemically determine heavy metal ions and organic compounds, including hormones, insecticides, herbicides or antibiotics, in different matrices.
Table 1. Main source, preparation, application and limit of detection (LOD) obtained from biochar-modified CPE and GCE.
Feedstock Electrode Analyte LOD
(nM)		 Linear
Range (M)		 Real Sample
Matrix		 Reference
Castor oil
cake		 Biochar-CPE Cd
Pb		 69 (Cd)
9.8 (Pb)		 (0.03–5.0) × 10−5
(0.001–5.0) × 10−5		 wastewater [39]
Castor oil
cake		 HgND-Biochar-CPE Zn 170 (0.07–3) × 10−5 collyrium and
ointment		 [40]
Castor oil
cake		 Bi-nano-Biochar-
CPE		 Pb 1.41 (0.005–1) × 10−3 Overglaze
decorated ceramic dishes		 [41]
Castor oil
cake		 Biochar-CPE Cu 400 (0.1–3.1) × 10−5 Vodka, cachaça,
gin and tequila		 [42]
Castor oil
cake		 Sbmicro-Biochar-
CPE		 Paraquat 34 (0.03–1.0) × 10−6 natural water
coconut water		 [43]
Castor oil
cake		 Biochar-CPE Isoniazid 63 (0.1–1.0) × 10−5 Synthetic
human urine		 [44]
Castor oil
cake		 Biochar-CPE Methyl
Parathion		 39 (0.01–170) × 10−6 Drinking water
and
fruit juices		 [45]
Sugarcane
bagasse		 BioNano-GCE 17 β-
estradiol		 11.3 (0.05–20) × 10−6 Groundwater [46]
Kiwi skin ZnCl2/Biochar GCE AA
Dopamine
UA		 20
160
110		 (0.05–200) × 10−6
(2–2000) × 10−6
(1–2500) × 10−6		 Human urine [47]
Dandelion
pappus		 Npc/GCE Try 30 (1–103) × 10−6 Commercial
amino acid
injection and
Fetal calf serum		 [48]
Bamboo BioNC-GCE Tmx 220 (0.5–35) × 10−7 Spinach, Rice,
Pear, Red soil,
Tap water,
Farmland water,
River water,
Lake water		 [49]
Water
Hyacinth		 Biochar-rGO-
CPE		 Cbz 2.3 (30–900) × 10−8 Orange juice,
Lettuce leaves,
Drinking water,
Wastewater		 [50]
Castor oil
cake		 Ac-biochar-CPE Caffeic acid 30.9 (1.0–3000) × 10−6 White, Rose and
Red wine		 [51]
Castor oil
cake		 Ni/biochar-CPE Glucose 137 (5–100) × 10−6 Human saliva
Blood serum		 [52]
Pumpkin
stems		 Biochar-GCE AA
Dopamine
UA		 2300
30
510		 (30–95) × 10−6
(1–65) × 10−6
(2–230) × 10−6		 SH and Human
blood serum		 [53]
Bamboo
fungus		 Biochar-GCE Bis-A 1068 (0.02–10) × 10−6 Groundwater [54]
Kelp Act-biochar-GCE Acp 4 (2.5–2000) × 10−6 Human serum
And Medical
tablet		 [55]
Acronyms: Biochar-modified (Biochar-CPE), Hg nanodroplets (HgND), Bi-nanostructures (Bi-nano), Sb-microparticles (Sb-micro), Biochar nanoparticle (BioNano), Ascorbic and Uric acid (AA and UA), Nanoporous carbon (Npc), Tryptophan (Try), Biochar nanocomposite (BioNC), Thiometoxan (Tmx), reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite (rGO), Carbendazim (Cbz), activated biochar (Ac-Biochar), Snail hemolymph (SH), Bisphenol A (Bis-A), Acetaminophen (Acp).
Several papers, present in the literature, reported the use of Castor oil biochar to develop voltammetric sensors for the detection of heavy metals in water or food [39][40][41][42][43][44][45]. In this regard, one of the first applications of biochar was reported by Suguhiro et al. in 2013 [39]. In this work, the authors exploited both the high affinity for heavy metals [43][44] and the electrocatalytic capacity of biochar to develop a voltammetric sensor for the determination of lead (II) and cadmium (II). Chiefly, they proposed, for the first time, the characterization of adsorptive properties of biochar, typical of bio-carbon obtained under low-temperature pyrolysis conditions [56], using differential pulse adsorptive voltammetry (DPAdSV). The sensors showed excellent analytical performances with a low LOD (nanomolar range), excellent sensitivity, stability and recovery (>94%), with the absence of significant interference by common cations present in waters. Comparable results were obtained by Olivera et al. (2015) for the determination of copper using biochar (form the same feedstock)-modified CPE. Moreover, for organic compounds, interesting results were obtained when biochar by bamboo was modified with inorganic salts such as ZnCl2 [57] or carbonate minerals dolomite (DM) [58] or used to modify the electrodic surface of GCE. The electrochemical performance of these modified electrodes improved in terms of sensitivity (lower LOD) and stability, especially when used in clinical and food matrices. Another remarkable application is that of L. He and coworkers (2020). They developed a sensitive and reusable electrochemical biosensor for bisphenol A (BPA) based on newly synthesized biochar nanoparticles (BCNPs) [59]. In this work, a stable immobilization of the tyrosinase (Tyr) enzyme using the carboxyl functionality of the highly conductive magnetic biochar nanoparticles was proposed. This biosensor, based on GCEs, presented very promising analytical performances with a detection limit (LOD) of 2.78 nM with linear ranges from 0.01 to 1.01 μM [59].
Moreover, this is not the only biochar-based biosensor for the detection of bisphenol A. Indeed, Y. Liu and coworkers (2019) presented an electrochemical tyrosinase enzyme (Tyr)-based biosensor using a highly conductive sugarcane-derived biochar nanoparticle (BCNP) for the detection of BPA [54]. In this biosensor (BCNPs/Tyr/Nafion/GCE), a higher sensing signal (improved amperometric current responses) due to the conductivity property of biochar nanoparticles was observed. Precisely, a decreased charge transfer resistance and lowered reduction potential were obtained if compared with the biosensor based on bare GCE (Tyr/Nafion/GCE). Moreover, biochar-based biosensors showed robust analytical performances with a sensitivity of 3.18 nM and a linear range from 0.2 to 10 μM. These results were confirmed when the device was employed in real water detection, as evidenced by the high accuracy compared to that of high-performance liquid chromatography. Another attention-grabbing application of biochar is that proposed by A. Sobhan and coworkers (2021). In this work, they employed activated biochar (activated by steam-activation method) from corn stover for the development of a biosensor (ABC/PLA-based platform) selective for NH3. The analytical performances reported in Figure 3 [60] demonstrate the robustness of the method when used in smart food packaging control. Moreover, careful characterization in terms of polylactic acid (PLA, ranging from 15 to 50%), electrical conductivity and tensile strength were reported.
Figure 3. Schematic representation of ABC/PLA-based biosensor fabrication (a) and its analytical performances (from (b–e)). In particular, in (b) the resistance response to NH3 concentrations, in (c) the sensitivity, in (d) the comparison of I-V data of 85% ABC/PLA-based biosensor in the presence/absence of NH3 and (d) the stability of the biosensor using a fixed concentration of NH3 (50 ppm) was reported.
Q. Zhou et al. (2021) reported on the fabrication of a sensor based on corncob biochar-modified GCE for the determination of dibutyl phthalate (DBP) [61]. In this tool, functional corncob biochar (F-CC3) and MIP were combined, achieving high sensitivity (detection limit of 2.6 nM), reproducibility and successful application in the detection of DBP in rice wine [61]. However, there are also many examples of biochar-modified CPE-based biosensors. For instance, C. Kalinke and her co-workers proposed an electronic tongue based on biochar-modified CPE for the detection of phenolic compounds using stripping voltammetry (see Figure 4). In particular, this artificial neural network (2019)-based electronic tongue used stripping voltammetry as a discrimination technique for the analysis of a mixture of several phenolic compounds, such as catechol (CAT), 4-ethylcatechol (4-EC) and 4-ethylguaiacol (4-EG), showing good sensitivity (LOD in the micromolar range) and reproducibility [62].
Figure 4. (a) Schematic representation of voltammetric electronic tongue-based biochar-modified CPE for phenolic compounds stripping detection. Cyclic voltammograms and analytical curves obtained for catechol (CAT), 4-ethylcatechol (4EC) and ethylguaiacol (4-EG) using CPE, CPME-CNT and CPME-AB (b–g, respectively).
Furthermore, other works based on biochar have been proposed by the same research group. For example, they developed a non-enzymatic sensor based on nickel-supported activated biochar modified-CPE (NiAB-CPME) for the determination of glucose [52]. The biosensor showed good performances in terms of repeatability (RSD% = 3.84%), sensitivity (LOD 0.137 µM) and linear range from 5.0 to 100.0 µM. Moreover, they applied this feasible green analytical procedure for the determination of glucose in human saliva and blood serum, also obtaining satisfactory results when a microfluidic methodology was used, thus proving to be a simple, robust and accurate method. In addition, in a second work, they presented a quick electrochemical immunoassay for the detection of pathogens based on biochar-modified CPE [63]. In this paper, the authors developed an immunosensor to detect Hantaviruses (single-stranded RNA viruses belonging to the Hantaviridae family) [63]. Matins and his co-workers exploited the highly functionalized surface of biochar able to bind covalently (by EDC/NHS conjugation) the specific antibody for Hantavirus in the construction of the immunosensor. The device showed good analytical performances with a LOD of 0.14 ngmL−1 and a linear range ranging from 5.0 to 1.0 μgmL−1. Other biosensors dealing with biochar-modified CPE and GCE are reported in Table 2.
Table 2. Main source, preparation, application, limit of detection (LOD) and biosensors based on biochar.
Feedstock Electrode Analyte LOD
(nM)		 Linear
Range (M)		 Real Sample
Matrix		 Reference
Castor oil
cake		 Biochar-CPE Cd
Pb		 69 (Cd)
9.8 (Pb)		 (0.03–5.0) × 10−5
(0.001–5.0) × 10−5		 wastewater [39]
Castor oil
cake		 HgND-Biochar-CPE Zn 170 (0.07–3) × 10−5 collyrium and
ointment		 [40]
Castor oil
cake		 Bi-nano-Biochar-
CPE		 Pb 1.41 (0.005–1) × 10−3 Overglaze
decorated ceramic dishes		 [41]
Castor oil
cake		 Biochar-CPE Cu 400 (0.1–3.1) × 10−5 Vodka, cachaça,
gin and tequila		 [42]
Castor oil
cake		 Sbmicro-Biochar-
CPE		 Paraquat 34 (0.03–1.0) × 10−6 natural water
coconut water		 [43]
Castor oil
cake		 Biochar-CPE Isoniazid 63 (0.1–1.0) × 10−5 Synthetic
human urine		 [44]
Castor oil
cake		 Biochar-CPE Methyl
Parathion		 39 (0.01–170) × 10−6 Drinking water
and
fruit juices		 [45]
Sugarcane
bagasse		 BioNano-GCE 17 β-
estradiol		 11.3 (0.05–20) × 10−6 Groundwater [46]
Kiwi skin ZnCl2/Biochar GCE AA
Dopamine
UA		 20
160
110		 (0.05–200) × 10−6
(2–2000) × 10−6
(1–2500) × 10−6		 Human urine [47]
Dandelion
pappus		 Npc/GCE Try 30 (1–103) × 10−6 Commercial
amino acid
injection and
Fetal calf serum		 [48]
Bamboo BioNC-GCE Tmx 220 (0.5–35) × 10−7 Spinach, Rice,
Pear, Red soil,
Tap water,
Farmland water,
River water,
Lake water		 [49]
Water
Hyacinth		 Biochar-rGO-
CPE		 Cbz 2.3 (30–900) × 10−8 Orange juice,
Lettuce leaves,
Drinking water,
Wastewater		 [50]
Castor oil
cake		 Ac-biochar-CPE Caffeic acid 30.9 (1.0–3000) × 10−6 White, Rose and
Red wine		 [51]
Castor oil
cake		 Ni/biochar-CPE Glucose 137 (5–100) × 10−6 Human saliva
Blood serum		 [52]
Pumpkin
stems		 Biochar-GCE AA
Dopamine
UA		 2300
30
510		 (30–95) × 10−6
(1–65) × 10−6
(2–230) × 10−6		 SH and Human
blood serum		 [53]
Bamboo
fungus		 Biochar-GCE Bis-A 1068 (0.02–10) × 10−6 Groundwater [54]
Kelp Act-biochar-GCE Acp 4 (2.5–2000) × 10−6 Human serum
And Medical
tablet		 [55]
Acronyms: Biochar-modified (Biochar-CPE), Hg nanodroplets (HgND), Bi-nanostructures (Bi-nano), Sb-microparticles (Sb-micro), Biochar nanoparticle (BioNano), Ascorbic and Uric acid (AA and UA), Nanoporous carbon (Npc), Tryptophan (Try), Biochar nanocomposite (BioNC), Thiometoxan (Tmx), reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite (rGO), Carbendazim (Cbz), activated biochar (Ac-Biochar), Snail hemolymph (SH), Bisphenol A (Bis-A), Acetaminophen (Acp).

2.2. Biochar Application in Screen-Printed-Based Platforms

In the literature, several papers report the comparison of the analytical performances (using the same electroanalytical techniques) of SPEs with those of traditional (bulk) carbon or graphite electrochemical systems (GCE or CPE). The results underlined that, under the same experimental conditions, the combination of SPEs with portable electrochemical instruments represents the best possibility to have new reliable, reproducible, mass-producible and cost-effective electro-chemical tools [27][64][65]. Indeed, they can be easily modified with carbonaceous nanomaterials to improve their analytical performances [66][67]; in particular, this statement is confirmed by some examples of SPE modified with biochar, reported in the literature [13][17][27], used for its fascinating morphological and electrochemical features. In comparison with the bulk electrodes (the one reported in the previous paragraph, GCE and CPE), SPEs offer other advantages to coupling with cost-effective instrumentation, the capability of miniaturization and automation. However, it is well-known that these transducers, particularly when the working electrode (WE) is made of graphite-based materials, have serious issues due to their sluggish surface kinetics, which severely affect their performances [35]. Carbon materials and nanomaterials (CNMs) represent the most valid solution to overcome this problem, within which biochar is undoubtedly the most innovative and eco-friendly alternative. The modification of SPEs with CNMs and thus also with biochar provides several advantages. Among them, improved surface kinetics, enhanced electroactive surface area and amended adsorption and functionalization capability are, undoubtedly, the most important [66][67][68]. This represents a whole new field of research in full flow, but there are still few works dealing with sensors and biosensors based on SPE-modified with biochar. Table 3 reports the latest research works published about the development of biochar-based biosensors, and some examples of them are discussed in detail hereafter.
Table 3. Main source, preparation, application, limit of detection (LOD) and sensors based on biochar.
Sensor Source Analyte LOD (μM) Reference
nanoF-biochar-SPE Eucalyptus scraps o-diphenols
m-phenols		 0.6
3.8		 [68]
PVB/biochar-SPE Waste coffee ground Humidity 20 RH% [69]
Tub-biochar-SPE Peachwood Lead ions 0.02 [70]
Ty-biochar-SPE BSG Catecholamine 20 [34]
PVP-biochar-SPE Conifer and rapeseed pellets Humidity 5 RH% [71]
Inverse-designed SPE BSG Potassium ferricyanide, AA, hexaammine ruthenium(III) chloride and NADH 3
3
9
12		 [72]
Cnf-biochar-SPE Eucalyptus scraps Hydroxytyrosol (o-diphenol) and tyrosol (m-phenol) ≤0.5
≤3.8		 [73]
cMbOx-biochar-SPE Chicken feather waste HydroquinoneCatechol 0.063
0.059		 [74]
Laccase-carboLign-SPE Eucalyptus globulus Catechol 2.01 [75]
Biochar-SPE Kudzu vine Clenbuterol 0.75 [76]
SPE/2D activated carbon Desmostachya bipinnata Roxarsone 1.5 [77]
Fdop-Ac-biochar-SPE Corchorus genus (jute) Nitrite 0.05 [78]
Biochar-SPE Rice husk ash Humidity 15% RH [79]
SPE/hydrochar Orange peels waste Dopamine 0.2 [80]
nanoPd-Cu-Ac-biochar-SPE Pistachio nutshells Riboflavin 0.0008 [81]
nanoGF-Ac-biochar-nanoFeOx-SPE Tamarind fruit shells Rutin 0.027 [82]
Biochar-SPE Bamboo Humidity 10% RH [83]
Acronyms: Nanofiber-biochar (nanoF-biochar), Brewer’s spent grain (BSG), Tubular-biochar (Tub-biochar), Carbon nanofiber-biochar (Cnf-biochar), Carbon-based molybdenum oxide (cMbOx), carbonized lignin-based biochar (carbo-Lign), Fluorine-doped tin oxide/activated biochar (Fdop-Ac-biochar-SPE), palladium-copper nanoparticles/activated biochar SPE (nanoPd-Cu-Ac-biochar), graphitic-activated carbon/iron oxide nanocomposite (nanoGF-Ac-biochar-nanoFeOx).
An example of the electrochemical application of biochar as a serigraphic platform modifier (traditional SPE and inverse-designed IDSPE) was proposed by Cancelliere et al. (2019) [36]. The study, reported in Figure 5, showed the potentiality of biochar when used as a modifier of the WE with a remarkable improvement of the electrochemical performances in terms of electroanalytical parameters, such as peak-to-peak separation (ΔE), heterogeneous electron transfer rate constant (k0) and current peak ratio (Ipa/Ipc). In this work, by comparing the analytical performances between biochar-modified and unmodified SPEs, an enormous gain in sensitivity and repeatability was assessed. This is ascribable to the actual benefits provided by this recycling material once cast on the WE surface, thereby demonstrating its effectiveness as an electrochemical enhancer.
Figure 5. Two different configurations of serigraphic platforms and enhancing effect of the biochar.
The same research group also proposed two biochar-based biosensors. In one, they developed a tyrosinase-based amperometric biosensor (Ty/biochar-SPE) in which the enzyme was directly immobilized on biochar-modified SPEs. This biosensor showed very promising analytical performances when assessed for the detection of catecholamines, with a linear working range for epinephrine from 0.05 up to 0.5 mM and a LOD of 2 × 10−4 mM [34]. In the other, they used biochar both as an anchoring system and as an electrochemical enhancer, fabricating an ultrasensitive voltammetric label-free immunosensor for interleukin-6 (IL-6). The immunosensing platform was evaluated both in serum and in whole blood samples, showing excellent analytical assessment with LOD in the pico-molar range (5.4 pgmL−1), good reproducibility (RSD% < 11%) and recovery (always >85%). The peculiarity of this immunosensor resides in its time-saving ability coupled with powerful performances when compared with commercial spectrophotometric ELISA kits [35]. Another interesting work, reported in Figure 6, is that developed by the research group of Compagnone [68]. Precisely, they presented water-phase exfoliated biochar nanofibers from Eucalyptus scraps that they used both for the modification of the screen-printed electrodes (BH-SPE) and for the fabrication of a conductive film (BH-film). The BH-based sensors exhibited robust analytical performances with good repeatability (RSD ≤ 7%, n = 5), reproducibility (RSD ≤ 10%; n = 3), sensitivity for hydroxytyrosol (LOD ≤ 0.6 μM) and tyrosol (LOD ≤ 3.8μM) and recovery in the real sample matrix (91–111%, RSD ≤ 6%; n = 3) [68].
Figure 6. (a) Schematic representation of BH-SPE (red lines) and BH-film (blue lines) preparation and (b–e) their application in the detection of caffeic acid and dopamine (25 μM).
However, there are different works in which biochar is exploited for the development of powerful humidity sensors. Among them, one of the most promising is that of Jagdale et al. (2019) [69]. They proposed biochar from waste coffee as a material for the development of impedimetric humidity sensors (see Figure 7). The sensing platforms were produced (heated at 300 °C) using an ink-containing CGB with polyvinyl butyral (PVB), which acts as a temporary binder and ethylene glycol monobutyral ether, as an organic vehicle. The sensitivity tests (humidity), performed at room temperature under a flow of 1.7 Lmin−1 in a relative humidity range from 0 to 100%, showed an initial impedance of the film of 25.2 ± 0.15 MΩ, which changes to 12.3 MΩ under 98% humidity exposure, with a sensor response above 20% [69].
Chemosensors 10 00344 g009 550
Figure 7. Schematic representation of humidity sensor based on biochar from waste coffee.

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/chemosensors10080344

References

  1. Baig, N.; Kammakakam, I.; Falath, W. Nanomaterials: A review of synthesis methods, properties, recent progress, and challenges. Mater. Adv. 2021, 2, 1821–1871.
  2. Kolahalam, L.A.; Kasi Viswanath, I.V.; Diwakar, B.S.; Govindh, B.; Reddy, V.; Murthy, Y.L.N. Review on nanomaterials: Synthesis and applications. Mater. Today Proc. 2019, 18, 2182–2190.
  3. Choi, S.; Lee, H.; Ghaffari, R.; Hyeon, T.; Kim, D.-H. Recent Advances in Flexible and Stretchable Bio-Electronic Devices Integrated with Nanomaterials. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 4203–4218.
  4. Chattopadhyay, J.; Srivastava, N. Application of Nanomaterials in Chemical Sensors and Biosensors, 1st ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2021; ISBN 978-0-367-44073-2.
  5. Ur Rahim, H.; Qaswar, M.; Uddin, M.; Giannini, C.; Herrera, M.L.; Rea, G. Nano-Enable Materials Promoting Sustainability and Resilience in Modern Agriculture. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2068.
  6. Yuan, X.; Zhang, X.; Sun, L.; Wei, Y.; Wei, X. Cellular Toxicity and Immunological Effects of Carbon-based Nanomaterials. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2019, 16, 18.
  7. Zaytseva, O.; Neumann, G. Carbon nanomaterials: Production, impact on plant development, agricultural and environmental applications. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 2016, 3, 17.
  8. Nsamba, H.K.; Hale, S.E.; Cornelissen, G.; Bachmann, R.T. Sustainable Technologies for Small-Scale Biochar Production—A Review. J. Sustain. Bioenergy Syst. 2015, 5, 10–31.
  9. Jeyasubramanian, K.; Thangagiri, B.; Sakthivel, A.; Dhaveethu Raja, J.; Seenivasan, S.; Vallinayagam, P.; Madhavan, D.; Malathi Devi, S.; Rathika, B. A complete review on biochar: Production, property, multifaceted applications, interaction mechanism and computational approach. Fuel 2021, 292, 120243.
  10. Cha, J.S.; Park, S.H.; Jung, S.-C.; Ryu, C.; Jeon, J.-K.; Shin, M.-C.; Park, Y.-K. Production and utilization of biochar: A review. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2016, 40, 1–15.
  11. Panwar, N.L.; Pawar, A.; Salvi, B.L. Comprehensive review on production and utilization of biochar. SN Appl. Sci. 2019, 1, 168.
  12. Sohi, S.P.; Krull, E.; Lopez-Capel, E.; Bol, R. A Review of Biochar and Its Use and Function in Soil. In Advances in Agronomy; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2010; Volume 105, pp. 47–82. ISBN 978-0-12-381023-6.
  13. Wang, J.; Wang, S. Preparation, modification and environmental application of biochar: A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 227, 1002–1022.
  14. Weber, K.; Quicker, P. Properties of biochar. Fuel 2018, 217, 240–261.
  15. Lehmann, J. A handful of carbon. Nature 2007, 447, 143–144.
  16. Manyà, J.J. Pyrolysis for Biochar Purposes: A Review to Establish Current Knowledge Gaps and Research Needs. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 7939–7954.
  17. Rahman, M.Z.; Edvinsson, T.; Kwong, P. Biochar for electrochemical applications. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 2020, 23, 25–30.
  18. Alfattani, R.; Shah, M.A.; Siddiqui, M.I.H.; Ali, M.A.; Alnaser, I.A. Bio-Char Characterization Produced from Walnut Shell Biomass through Slow Pyrolysis: Sustainable for Soil Amendment and an Alternate Bio-Fuel. Energies 2021, 15, 1.
  19. Lee, J.; Kim, K.-H.; Kwon, E.E. Biochar as a Catalyst. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 77, 70–79.
  20. Sun, D.; Hale, L.; Kar, G.; Soolanayakanahally, R.; Adl, S. Phosphorus recovery and reuse by pyrolysis: Applications for agriculture and environment. Chemosphere 2018, 194, 682–691.
  21. Inyang, M.I.; Gao, B.; Yao, Y.; Xue, Y.; Zimmerman, A.; Mosa, A.; Pullammanappallil, P.; Ok, Y.S.; Cao, X. A review of biochar as a low-cost adsorbent for aqueous heavy metal removal. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 46, 406–433.
  22. Bartoli, M.; Giorcelli, M.; Jagdale, P.; Rovere, M.; Tagliaferro, A. A Review of Non-Soil Biochar Applications. Materials 2020, 13, 261.
  23. Spanu, D.; Binda, G.; Dossi, C.; Monticelli, D. Biochar as an alternative sustainable platform for sensing applications: A review. Microchem. J. 2020, 159, 105506.
  24. Huggins, T.; Wang, H.; Kearns, J.; Jenkins, P.; Ren, Z.J. Biochar as a sustainable electrode material for electricity production in microbial fuel cells. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 157, 114.
  25. Kane, S.; Ulrich, R.; Harrington, A.; Stadie, N.P.; Ryan, C. Physical and chemical mechanisms that influence the electrical conductivity of lignin-derived biochar. Carbon Trends 2021, 5, 100088.
  26. Liu, W.-J.; Jiang, H.; Yu, H.-Q. Development of Biochar-Based Functional Materials: Toward a Sustainable Platform Carbon Material. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 12251–12285.
  27. Sperandio, G.; Amoriello, T.; Carbone, K.; Fedrizzi, M.; Monteleone, A.; Tarangioli, S.; Pagano, M. Increasing the value of spent grains from craft microbreweries for energy purposes. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2017, 58, 487–492.
  28. Joseph, S.; Husson, O.; Graber, E.; van Zwieten, L.; Taherymoosavi, S.; Thomas, T.; Nielsen, S.; Ye, J.; Pan, G.; Chia, C.; et al. The Electrochemical Properties of Biochars and How They Affect Soil Redox Properties and Processes. Agronomy 2015, 5, 322–340.
  29. Klüpfel, L.; Keiluweit, M.; Kleber, M.; Sander, M. Redox Properties of Plant Biomass-Derived Black Carbon (Biochar). Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 5601–5611.
  30. Zhao, L.; Cao, X.; Zheng, W.; Wang, Q.; Yang, F. Endogenous minerals have influences on surface electrochemistry and ion exchange properties of biochar. Chemosphere 2015, 136, 133–139.
  31. Ferreira, P.A.; Backes, R.; Martins, C.A.; de Carvalho, C.T.; da Silva, R.A.B. Biochar: A Low-cost Electrode Modifier for Electrocatalytic, Sensitive and Selective Detection of Similar Organic Compounds. Electroanalysis 2018, 30, 2233–2236.
  32. Kalinke, C.; Oliveira, P.R.; Oliveira, G.A.; Mangrich, A.S.; Marcolino-Junior, L.H.; Bergamini, M.F. Activated biochar: Preparation, characterization and electroanalytical application in an alternative strategy of nickel determination. Anal. Chim. Acta 2017, 983, 103–111.
  33. Yu, Q.; Zou, J.; Xiong, Q.; Peng, G.; Gao, F.; Fan, G.; Chen, S.; Lu, L. Electrochemical Sensor Based on Biochar Decorated with Gold Clusters for Sensitive Determination of Acetaminophen. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2022, 17, 220438.
  34. Cancelliere, R.; Carbone, K.; Pagano, M.; Cacciotti, I.; Micheli, L. Biochar from Brewers’ Spent Grain: A Green and Low-Cost Smart Material to Modify Screen-Printed Electrodes. Biosensors 2019, 9, 139.
  35. Cancelliere, R.; Di Tinno, A.; Di Lellis, A.M.; Contini, G.; Micheli, L.; Signori, E. Cost-effective and disposable label-free voltammetric immunosensor for sensitive detection of interleukin-6. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2022, 213, 114467.
  36. Cancelliere, R.; Di Tinno, A.; Di Lellis, A.M.; Tedeschi, Y.; Bellucci, S.; Carbone, K.; Signori, E.; Contini, G.; Micheli, L. An inverse-designed electrochemical platform for analytical applications. Electrochem. Commun. 2020, 121, 106862.
  37. Kalinke, C.; de Oliveira, P.R.; Bonacin, J.A.; Janegitz, B.C.; Mangrich, A.S.; Marcolino-Junior, L.H.; Bergamini, M.F. State-of-the-art and perspectives in the use of biochar for electrochemical and electroanalytical applications. Green Chem. 2021, 23, 5272–5301.
  38. Arduini, F.; Micheli, L.; Scognamiglio, V.; Mazzaracchio, V.; Moscone, D. Sustainable materials for the design of forefront printed (bio)sensors applied in agrifood sector. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2020, 128, 115909.
  39. Suguihiro, T.M.; de Oliveira, P.R.; de Rezende, E.I.P.; Mangrich, A.S.; Marcolino Junior, L.H.; Bergamini, M.F. An electroanalytical approach for evaluation of biochar adsorption characteristics and its application for Lead and Cadmium determination. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 143, 40–45.
  40. De Oliveira, P.R.; Lamy-Mendes, A.C.; Gogola, J.L.; Mangrich, A.S.; Marcolino Junior, L.H.; Bergamini, M.F. Mercury nanodroplets supported at biochar for electrochemical determination of zinc ions using a carbon paste electrode. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 151, 525–530.
  41. Agustini, D.; Mangrich, A.S.; Bergamini, M.F.; Marcolino-Junior, L.H. Sensitive voltammetric determination of lead released from ceramic dishes by using of bismuth nanostructures anchored on biochar. Talanta 2015, 142, 221–227.
  42. Oliveira, P.R.; Lamy-Mendes, A.C.; Rezende, E.I.P.; Mangrich, A.S.; Marcolino Junior, L.H.; Bergamini, M.F. Electrochemical determination of copper ions in spirit drinks using carbon paste electrode modified with biochar. Food Chem. 2015, 171, 426–431.
  43. Kalinke, C.; Mangrich, A.S.; Marcolino-Junior, L.H.; Bergamini, M.F. Carbon Paste Electrode Modified with Biochar for Sensitive Electrochemical Determination of Paraquat. Electroanalysis 2016, 28, 764–769.
  44. Oliveira, P.R.; Kalinke, C.; Mangrich, A.S.; Marcolino-Junior, L.H.; Bergamini, M.F. Copper hexacyanoferrate nanoparticles supported on biochar for amperometric determination of isoniazid. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 285, 373–380.
  45. De Oliveira, P.R.; Kalinke, C.; Gogola, J.L.; Mangrich, A.S.; Junior, L.H.M.; Bergamini, M.F. The use of activated biochar for development of a sensitive electrochemical sensor for determination of methyl parathion. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2017, 799, 602–608.
  46. Dong, X.; He, L.; Liu, Y.; Piao, Y. Preparation of highly conductive biochar nanoparticles for rapid and sensitive detection of 17β-estradiol in water. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 292, 55–62.
  47. Zhang, W.; Liu, L.; Li, Y.; Wang, D.; Ma, H.; Ren, H.; Shi, Y.; Han, Y.; Ye, B.-C. Electrochemical sensing platform based on the biomass-derived microporous carbons for simultaneous determination of ascorbic acid, dopamine, and uric acid. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018, 121, 96–103.
  48. Han, J.; Zhao, J.; Li, Z.; Zhang, H.; Yan, Y.; Cao, D.; Wang, G. Nanoporous carbon derived from dandelion pappus as an enhanced electrode material with low cost for amperometric detection of tryptophan. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2018, 818, 149–156.
  49. Chen, S.; Li, L.; Wen, Y.; Yang, G.; Liu, G.; Yi, Y.; Shang, Q.; Yang, X.; Cai, S. Voltammetric Analysis of Thiamethoxam Based on Inexpensive Thick-Walled Moso Bamboo Biochar Nanocomposites. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2019, 14, 10848–10861.
  50. Sant’Anna, M.V.S.; Carvalho, S.W.M.M.; Gevaerd, A.; Silva, J.O.S.; Santos, E.; Carregosa, I.S.C.; Wisniewski, A.; Marcolino-Junior, L.H.; Bergamini, M.F.; Sussuchi, E.M. Electrochemical sensor based on biochar and reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite for carbendazim determination. Talanta 2020, 220, 121334.
  51. Kalinke, C.; Zanicoski-Moscardi, A.P.; de Oliveira, P.R.; Mangrich, A.S.; Marcolino-Junior, L.H.; Bergamini, M.F. Simple and low-cost sensor based on activated biochar for the stripping voltammetric detection of caffeic acid. Microchem. J. 2020, 159, 105380.
  52. Kalinke, C.; Wosgrau, V.; Oliveira, P.R.; Oliveira, G.A.; Martins, G.; Mangrich, A.S.; Bergamini, M.F.; Marcolino-Junior, L.H. Green method for glucose determination using microfluidic device with a non-enzymatic sensor based on nickel oxyhydroxide supported at activated biochar. Talanta 2019, 200, 518–525.
  53. Ramalechume, C.; Mageswari, G.; Swamidoss, C.M.A. Determination of dopamine in the presence of ascorbic acid using polyaniline/carbon dot composites. Mater. Today Proc. 2020.
  54. Liu, Y.; Yao, L.; He, L.; Liu, N.; Piao, Y. Electrochemical Enzyme Biosensor Bearing Biochar Nanoparticle as Signal Enhancer for Bisphenol A Detection in Water. Sensors 2019, 19, 1619.
  55. Shan, R.; Shi, Y.; Gu, J.; Wang, Y.; Yuan, H. Single and competitive adsorption affinity of heavy metals toward peanut shell-derived biochar and its mechanisms in aqueous systems. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2020, 28, 1375–1383.
  56. Jian, X.; Zhuang, X.; Li, B.; Xu, X.; Wei, Z.; Song, Y.; Jiang, E. Comparison of characterization and adsorption of biochars produced from hydrothermal carbonization and pyrolysis. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2018, 10, 27–35.
  57. Li, Y.; Shao, J.; Wang, X.; Deng, Y.; Yang, H.; Chen, H. Characterization of Modified Biochars Derived from Bamboo Pyrolysis and Their Utilization for Target Component (Furfural) Adsorption. Energy Fuels 2014, 28, 5119–5127.
  58. Oo, A.Z.; Sudo, S.; Akiyama, H.; Win, K.T.; Shibata, A.; Yamamoto, A.; Sano, T.; Hirono, Y. Effect of dolomite and biochar addition on N2O and CO2 emissions from acidic tea field soil. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0192235.
  59. He, L.; Yang, Y.; Kim, J.; Yao, L.; Dong, X.; Li, T.; Piao, Y. Multi-layered enzyme coating on highly conductive magnetic biochar nanoparticles for bisphenol A sensing in water. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 384, 123276.
  60. Sobhan, A.; Muthukumarappan, K.; Wei, L.; Qiao, Q.; Rahman, M.T.; Ghimire, N. Development and characterization of a novel activated biochar-based polymer composite for biosensors. Int. J. Polym. Anal. Charact. 2021, 26, 544–560.
  61. Zhou, Q.; Guo, M.; Wu, S.; Fornara, D.; Sarkar, B.; Sun, L.; Wang, H. Electrochemical sensor based on corncob biochar layer supported chitosan-MIPs for determination of dibutyl phthalate (DBP). J. Electroanal. Chem. 2021, 897, 115549.
  62. Kalinke, C.; Oliveira, P.R.; Bonet San Emeterio, M.; González-Calabuig, A.; Valle, M.; Salvio Mangrich, A.; Humberto Marcolino Junior, L.; Bergamini, M.F. Voltammetric Electronic Tongue Based on Carbon Paste Electrodes Modified with Biochar for Phenolic Compounds Stripping Detection. Electroanalysis 2019, 31, 2238–2245.
  63. Martins, G.; Gogola, J.L.; Caetano, F.R.; Kalinke, C.; Jorge, T.R.; Santos, C.N.D.; Bergamini, M.F.; Marcolino-Junior, L.H. Quick electrochemical immunoassay for hantavirus detection based on biochar platform. Talanta 2019, 204, 163–171.
  64. Kerr, E.; Alexander, R.; Francis, P.S.; Guijt, R.M.; Barbante, G.J.; Doeven, E.H. A Comparison of Commercially Available Screen-Printed Electrodes for Electrogenerated Chemiluminescence Applications. Front. Chem. 2021, 8, 628483.
  65. Cancelliere, R.; Tinno, A.D.; Cataldo, A.; Bellucci, S.; Micheli, L. Powerful Electron-Transfer Screen-Printed Platforms as Biosensing Tools: The Case of Uric Acid Biosensor. Biosensors 2021, 12, 2.
  66. Di Tinno, A.; Cancelliere, R.; Mantegazza, P.; Cataldo, A.; Paddubskaya, A.; Ferrigno, L.; Kuzhir, P.; Maksimenko, S.; Shuba, M.; Maffucci, A.; et al. Sensitive Detection of Industrial Pollutants Using Modified Electrochemical Platforms. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1779.
  67. Sasirekha, N.; Chen, Y.W. Carbonaceous Nanomaterials for Environmental Remediation; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021.
  68. Bukhari, Q.U.A.; Silveri, F.; Della Pelle, F.; Scroccarello, A.; Zappi, D.; Cozzoni, E.; Compagnone, D. Water-Phase Exfoliated Biochar Nanofibers from Eucalyptus Scraps for Electrode Modification and Conductive Film Fabrication. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 13988–13998.
  69. Jagdale, P.; Ziegler, D.; Rovere, M.; Tulliani, J.; Tagliaferro, A. Waste Coffee Ground Biochar: A Material for Humidity Sensors. Sensors 2019, 19, 801.
  70. Chen, X.; Lu, K.; Lin, D.; Li, Y.; Yin, S.; Zhang, Z.; Tang, M.; Chen, G. Hierarchical Porous Tubular Biochar Based Sensor for Detection of Trace Lead (II). Electroanalysis 2021, 33, 473–482.
  71. Ziegler, D.; Palmero, P.; Giorcelli, M.; Tagliaferro, A.; Tulliani, J.-M. Biochars as Innovative Humidity Sensing Materials. Chemosensors 2017, 5, 35.
  72. Scroccarello, A.; Pelle, F.D.; Bukhari, Q.U.A.; Silveri, F.; Zappi, D.; Cozzoni, E.; Compagnone, D. Eucalyptus Biochar as a Sustainable Nanomaterial for Electrochemical Sensors. Chem. Proc. 2021, 5, 13.
  73. Ganesan, S.; Sivam, S.; Elancheziyan, M.; Senthilkumar, S.; Ramakrishan, S.G.; Soundappan, T.; Ponnusamy, V.K. Novel delipidated chicken feather waste-derived carbon-based molybdenum oxide nanocomposite as efficient electrocatalyst for rapid detection of hydroquinone and catechol in environmental waters. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 293, 118556.
  74. Zappi, D.; Varani, G.; Cozzoni, E.; Iatsunskyi, I.; Laschi, S.; Giardi, M.T. Innovative Eco-Friendly Conductive Ink Based on Carbonized Lignin for the Production of Flexible and Stretchable Bio-Sensors. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 3428.
  75. Zhang, K.; Ge, Y.; He, S.; Ge, F.; Huang, Q.; Huang, Z.; Wang, X.; Wen, Y.; Wang, B. Development of New Electrochemical Sensor based on Kudzu Vine Biochar Modified Flexible Carbon Electrode for Portable Wireless Intelligent Analysis of Clenbuterol. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2020, 15, 7326–7336.
  76. Nikhil; Srivastava, S.K.; Srivastava, A.; Srivastava, M.; Prakash, R. Electrochemical Sensing of Roxarsone on Natural Biomass-Derived Two-Dimensional Carbon Material as Promising Electrode Material. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 2908–2917.
  77. Ahammad, A.J.S.; Pal, P.R.; Shah, S.S.; Islam, T.; Hasan, M.; Qasem, M.A.A.; Odhikari, N.; Sarker, S.; Kim, D.M.; Aziz, A. Activated jute carbon paste screen-printed FTO electrodes for nonenzymatic amperometric determination of nitrite. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2019, 832, 368–379.
  78. Ziegler, D.; Boschetto, F.; Marin, E.; Palmero, P.; Pezzotti, G.; Tulliani, J.-M. Rice husk ash as a new humidity sensing material and its aging behavior. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 328, 129049.
  79. Espro, C.; Satira, A.; Mauriello, F.; Anajafi, Z.; Moulaee, K.; Iannazzo, D.; Neri, G. Orange peels-derived hydrochar for chemical sensing applications. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 341, 130016.
  80. Sangili, A.; Veerakumar, P.; Chen, S.-M.; Rajkumar, C.; Lin, K.-C. Voltammetric determination of vitamin B2 by using a highly porous carbon electrode modified with palladium-copper nanoparticles. Microchim. Acta 2019, 186, 299.
  81. Elancheziyan, M.; Ganesan, S.; Theyagarajan, K.; Duraisamy, M.; Thenmozhi, K.; Weng, C.-H.; Lin, Y.-T.; Ponnusamy, V.K. Novel biomass-derived porous-graphitic carbon coated iron oxide nanocomposite as an efficient electrocatalyst for the sensitive detection of rutin (vitamin P) in food and environmental samples. Environ. Res. 2022, 211, 113012.
  82. Mahmoud, M.E.; Khalifa, M.A.; El Wakeel, Y.M.; Header, M.S.; El-Sharkawy, R.M.; Kumar, S.; Abdel-Fattah, T.M. A novel nanocomposite of Liquidambar styraciflua fruit biochar-crosslinked-nanosilica for uranyl removal from water. Bioresour Technol. 2019, 278, 124.
  83. Afify, A.S.; Ahmad, S.; Khushnood, R.A.; Jagdale, P.; Tulliani, J.-M. Elaboration and characterization of novel humidity sensor based on micro-carbonized bamboo particles. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 239, 1251–1256.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!
ScholarVision Creations
Feedback