An Overview of PDE4 Inhibitors in Clinical Trials: History
View Latest Version
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Contributor:
Letizia Crocetti
,
Giuseppe Floresta
,
Agostino Cilibrizzi
,
Maria Paola Giovannoni

Since the early 1980s, phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) has been an attractive target for the treatment of inflammation-based diseases. Several scientific advancements, by both academia and pharmaceutical companies, have enabled the identification of many synthetic ligands for this target, along with the acquisition of precise information on biological requirements and linked therapeutic opportunities. The transition from pre-clinical to clinical phase was not easy for the majority of these compounds, mainly due to their significant side effects, and it took almost thirty years for a PDE4 inhibitor to become a drug i.e., Roflumilast, used in the clinics for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Three additional compounds have reached the market: Crisaborole for atopic dermatitis, Apremilast for psoriatic arthritis and Ibudilast for Krabbe disease. 

  • phosphodiesterase 4
  • PDE4 inhibitors
  • clinical trials

1. Introduction

Starting from the discovery of phosphodiesterases (PDEs) by Sutherland and Rall in 1958 [1], there has been a continuous and wide interest by the medicinal chemistry community on the modulation of their activity. PDEs catalyse the hydrolysis of the phosphodiester bond of c-AMP and c-GMP affording the corresponding AMP and GMP inactive counterparts. In fact, the inhibition of PDE leads to an increase in cyclic nucleotide levels, which in turn play a prominent role as second messengers, in the regulation of a variety of cell functions, such as secretion, contraction, metabolism and growth [2][3][4][5].
The first important synthetic effort made during the ‘1980s by the pharmaceutical industry in the area of PDE led to the development and marketing by Sanofi-Aventis of the PDE3 inhibitor Milrinone [6][7] for the treatment of heart failure (Figure 1). However, this drug had many drawbacks and was later withdrawn from the market because of serious side effects in the long term. Indeed, chronic administration of Milrinone resulted in reduced survival, showing that chronic elevation of c-AMP in cardiac myocytes is associated with side effects provoking a major risk of fatal arrhythmias [8]. Milrinone is currently marketed exclusively for hospital use in cases of cardiac shock [9] and given its power, it is found in numerous clinical trials for pulmonary hypertension, septic shock and other (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04484675: Comparative Study Between Inhaled and Intravenous Milrinone in Patients With Severe Pulmonary Hypertension Undergoing Cardiac Surgery; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05122884: for the treatment/prevention of severe sepsis/septic shock, whose relatively common complication is myocardial dysfunction; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04362527: for the therapy of subarachnoid hemorrhage).
Molecules 27 04964 g001 550
Figure 1. PDEs inhibitors.
Another significant success was the launch of Sildenafil (Figure 1), the first oral PDE5 inhibitor originally studied for angina, and then approved by FDA and marketed by Pfizer as Viagra® in 1998 for the treatment of male erectile dysfunction [10][11][12]. About seven years later it was also approved for pulmonary arterial hypertension and classified as an orphan drug by EMEA [13]. The commercialization of Sildenafil was quickly followed by the marketing of additional PDE5 inhibitors [14].
This remarkable achievement reinforced the assumption to intensify the investigations also in the field of PDE4 inhibitors, already widely explored as potential candidates for the treatment of chronic inflammatory disorders. In the development of these drugs, the most ambitious goal was to be able to limit the side effects, in order to overcome the difficulties found with PDE3 inhibitors, therefore allowing chronic use.
The interest for PDE4 by both academia and pharmaceutical companies is widely documented by the numerous reviews and patents published over the past twenty years [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] and despite the disappointing results obtained in clinical studies with various PDE4 inhibitors, as well as the early termination of trials on compounds under development, very important results have been obtained in this field, as highlighted by the PDE4 inhibitors currently in clinical use.

2. Overview of PDE4

The superfamily of PDEs is currently subclassified into 11 families, namely PDE1-PDE11, which are characterized by different kinetic properties, tissue distribution, responsiveness to endogenous regulators (Ca2+, calmodulin, c-GMP) and co-factors (Mg2+, Zn2+), sensitivity to synthetic inhibitors and, in some cases, substrate specificity (c-AMP or c-GMP) [27]. Each family is expressed by one or more genes; furthermore, alternative mRNA processing is responsible for the production of multiple splice variants. Thus, until now, more than 50 distinct human PDE proteins have been identified. The generally accepted nomenclature for the different gene products is based on two capital letters indicating the species (HS, Homo sapiens, RT Ratus norvegicus), followed by PDE; then there is an Arabic numeral indicating the family, which is followed, in turn, by a capital letter for the gene (A, B, C, D) and finally by an Arabic numeral for the splice variant [28][29].
Phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) is the most diversified sub-family of phosphodiesterase (PDEs) and is abundantly expressed in a variety of cell types [30]. These enzymes have been found to mediate several physiological processes, such as brain functions, macrophage and monocyte activation, myocardial contractility, vascular smooth muscle proliferation and neutrophil infiltration, to name a few. Moreover, PDE4 has been reported to participate in the physio-pathogenesis of many inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma (Figure 2). Additionally, PDE4 have shown roles in the progress and development of autoimmune diseases, cardiovascular diseases, and cancers [31][32].
Molecules 27 04964 g002 550
Figure 2. PDE4s involvement in the physio-pathogenesis of inflammatory diseases.
Four different subtypes of PDE4 have been identified to date, namely PDE4A, PDE4B, PDE4C and PDE4D. The genes of these subtypes are located on chromosomes 19p13.2, 1p31, 19p13.11, and 5q12, and each of these subtypes can express from 3 to 11 different proteins, resulting in at least 25 different isoforms of PDE4 distributed within different cellular compartments and with different levels of expression. All the PDE4 have been reported to exist in three different forms based on their size i.e., long, short and super-short. The longer version of the protein has two conserved domains, UCR1 (of approximately 60 amino acids) and UCR2 (of approximately 80 amino acids) in the N-terminal region. Differently, the short form has only the UCR2 domain in full, while the super-short version of the protein has a truncated UCR2. At the C-terminus, all the PDE4 have a catalytic domain of 300–350 amino acids. The active site of the enzyme can be divided into three sections as shown by X-ray structures: (i) a pocket that interacts with the phosphate moiety of cAMP, (ii) two pockets that form interactions with small molecules inhibitors, and (iii) a solvated pocket [33][34]. Unfortunately, the high conserved sequence identity among the family of PDE4 make the discovery of isoform-selective inhibitors challenging.
The UCRs motifs of the PDE4 are also important for the PDE4 regulation [35]. PDE4 is regulated by transcriptional regulation (long-term) or post-translational modifications (short-term). When the protein kinase A (PKA) phosphorylates in a conserved PKA phosphorylation site the UCRs, it has been reported to regulate the PDE4 dimerization and catalytic activities [25]. In long-term regulation of PDE4, c-AMP concentration is increased and the activation of adenylyl cyclase (AC) by hormone mediate stimulation is assisted as a result of increased gene expression. Differently, in the short-term regulation, the activation of PKA is determined by the increased concentration of c-AMP levels. In turn, PKA phosphorylates specific serine residues in UCR1 of PDE4, producing a rapid increase in its activity. However, PDE4 activity is also regulated by other proteins such as Src family tyrosine protein kinases, arrestin and the receptor for activated C kinase 1 (RACK1) [35].

3. Inflammation and PDE4

The Nuclear Factor κ-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) can mediate cell-specific responses and pharmacological attempt to block its activation is being considered a new therapeutic option in inflammatory conditions (Figure 3) [36][37][38]. It is known that c-AMP interferes with the NF-κB signalling, being in parallel recognized as an immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory actor as well [39]. As a result, PDE4 could be potentially useful to indirectly leverage the inactivation/activation of the NF-κB signalling in inflammation. For instance, in endothelial cells, the high levels of c-AMP produced by an adenylate cyclase activator (e.g., forskolin) have been reported to prevent the NF-κB-dependent gene transcription [40]. When macrophages are treated with ethanol chronically, the inhibition of PDE4 has been proved to decrease the TNF-α mRNA expression, by the intervention of the transcriptional modulation of NF-κB [41]. Moreover, the inhibition of PDE4 leads not only to less NF-κB-mediated TNF-α expression but also to activation of the PKA and increased synthesis of IL-10 [42]. Consequently, inhibitors of PDE4 may be useful to modulate, negatively or positively, gene expression. Variation in the NF-κB by PDE4 and c-AMP has also been reported in T cells, where PDE4 has been found to control the proliferation of T lymphocytes, along with the concentration of TNF-α and other interleukins such as IL-2, IL-4, and IL-5 [43]. The c-AMP has also been reported as a crucial mediator of the regulation of T cell suppression, by crossing the cell membrane of responder T cells, such as CD4-positive [44] and TH2 subsets [45], as well as inhibiting T cell proliferation. In the context of inflammation, PDE4 are known to promote also chemotaxis and degranulation in both eosinophils and neutrophils. These effects are mediated by the increased concentration of IL-8, leukotriene B4 and superoxide anion stimulated by PDE4 in neutrophils. Moreover, PDE4 has been reported to control the expression of adhesion molecules, such as the β2-integrin Mac-1 in neutrophils, resulting in augmented adhesion to vascular endothelial cells [46][47].
Molecules 27 04964 g003 550
Figure 3. PDE4 inhibitors in the regulation of inflammatory responses [36][37][38].

4. From In Vitro and Preclinical Profile of The First PDE 4 Inhibitors to Approved Drugs

In the context of PDE4 inhibitors, it would appear definitely appropriate to start with Rolipram (Figure 1), the synthesis of which dates back to 1977 [48][49]. Rolipram has certainly been the most investigated PDE4 inhibitor, from the first studies carried out shortly after its synthesis, to investigations conducted at present time [50][51][52][53][54][55][56], including further clinical trials (as detailed below). Already at the time of the first studies on Rolipram and its analogues, there was a body of experimental evidence (confirmed later on) that PDE4 inhibitors were able to suppress inflammatory and immunomodulatory responses in a variety of murine and human cells, to block superoxide generation in monocytes, macrophages, neutrophils and eosinophils, to reduce TNF-α release in monocytes and macrophages, and to suppress chemotaxis and phagocytosis [57][58]. It is important to highlight that in eosinophils, which are the effectors “par excellence” of asthma, PDE4 inhibitors can suppress superoxide generation, chemotaxis, degranulation, LTC4 synthesis and CD11b expression. In vivo, PDE4 inhibitors demonstrated bronchodilatory effects and the ability to reverse bronchospasm induced by a variety of agents, thus, the profile of selective PDE4 inhibitors appeared to fulfil the requirement for the treatment of inflammation-based pathologies such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and some auto-immune diseases [15][59][60][61][62].
Even though such promising in vitro and preclinical results generated a large consensus on the concept of PDE4 as a valid target for the treatment of the above diseases, clinical evaluation of several potent and selective PDE4 inhibitors was strongly disappointing [63]. A lack of correlation between preclinical and clinical data was a prominent limitation. In this context, it is worth mentioning that the first clinical studies were performed with the first generation of PDE4 inhibitors (rolipram and congeners), which were characterized by serious adverse reactions found, at least in part, associated with the affinity for the high-affinity Rolipram binding site (HARBS) [64]. Only in 1996, it become evident that a better side-effect profile could be obtained with agents preferentially targeting the catalytic site over HARBS [65]. Then, this type of selectivity was not pursued any longer, and another type of selectivity versus the gene products A-D was proposed after these subtypes were characterized, their tissue distribution demonstrated and their different functional role suggested [66]. In the early 2000s, the PDE4D isoform was indicated as being responsible for PDE4 inhibitor-induced emesis [67], although recent studies suggest that it may not be the only factor involved in this side effect [68]; on the other hand, it has been demonstrated that PDE4B selective inhibitors produce potent anti-inflammatory and reduced emetic effects [69].
In the same way, crucial advancements were made on the knowledge of the biochemistry, pharmacology and molecular biology of the PDE4 family, including a detailed characterization of the different PDE4 subtypes, differentially expressed in tissues and cells [66]. The identification of a variety of potent and selective compounds, defined as second-generation PDE4 inhibitors, sustained the hope that the lower emetic potential of these molecules should overcome the problems encountered with rolipram and its congeners, whose development as antiasthma drugs failed due to the adverse reactions [16]. This newly acquired information greatly stimulated the research leading to the synthesis of Roflumilast by AstraZeneca, which was finally approved as a COPD drug in the EU (in 2010) and in the USA (in 2011) [70]. Since the marketing of Roflumilast, three additional compounds have been marketed as PDE4-inhibitor drugs (Figure 4) i.e., Crisaborole (by Pfizer) for atopic dermatitis [71], Apremilast (by Celgene) for psoriatic arthritis [72] and Ibudilast (by MediciNova) for Krabbe diseases (also known as globoid cell leukodystrophy) [73]. However, research in the field of PDE4 inhibitors has remained very active, leading to very potent and pharmacologically relevant ligands that have entered clinical trials for the treatment of a range of diseases. An overview of the most interesting compounds that have been developed and entered into clinical trials since the marketing of the first PDE4 inhibitor Roflumilast has been presented.
Molecules 27 04964 g004 550
Figure 4. From Rolipram to marketed PDE4 inhibitors.

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/molecules27154964

References

  1. Sutherland, E.W.; Rall, T.W. Fractionation and characterization of a cyclic adenine ribonucleotide formed by tissue particles. J. Biol. Chem. 1958, 232, 1077–1091.
  2. Newton, A.C.; Bootman, M.D.; Scott, J.D. Second messangers. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2016, 8, a005926.
  3. Raker, V.K.; Becker, C.; Steinbrink, K. The cAMP pathway as therapeutic target in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Front. Immunol. 2016, 7, 123.
  4. Fajardo, A.M.; Piazza, G.A.; Tinsley, H.N. The role of cyclic nucleotide signaling pathways in cancer: Targets for prevention and treatment. Cancers. 2014, 6, 436–458.
  5. Lorigo, M.; Oliveira, N.; Cairrao, E. PDE-mediated cyclic nucleotide compartmentation in vascular smooth muscle cells: From basic to a clinical perspective. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2022, 9, 4.
  6. Hasegawa, G.R. Milrinone, a new agent for the treatment of congestive heart failure. Clin. Pharm. 1986, 5, 201–205.
  7. Hilleman, D.E.; Forbes, W.P. Role of milrinone in the management of congestive heart failure. DICP 1989, 23, 357–362.
  8. Varriale, P.; Ramaprasad, S. Short-term intravenous milrinone for severe congestive heart failure: The good, bad, and not so good. Pharmacotherapy 1997, 17, 371–374.
  9. Lewis, T.C.; Aberle, C.; Altshuler, D.; Piper, G.L.; Papadopoulos, J. Comparative effectiveness and safety between Milrinone or Dobutamine as initial inotrope therapy in cardiogenic shock. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. Ther. 2019, 24, 130–138.
  10. Little, W.N.; Park, G.T.; Patton, H.M. Sildenafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction. N. Engl. J. Med. 1998, 339, 700.
  11. Goldstein, I.; Lue, T.F.; Padma-Nathan, H.; Rosen, R.C.; Steers, W.D.; Wicker, P.A. Oral sildenafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction. Sildenafil study group. N. Engl. J. Med. 1998, 338, 1397–1404.
  12. Cartledge, J.; Eardley, I. Sildenafil. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 1999, 1, 137–147.
  13. Antoniu, S.A. Sildenafil citrate for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2006, 7, 825–828.
  14. Ahmed, W.S.; Geethakumari, A.M.; Biswas, K.H. Phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5): Structure-function regulation and therapeutic applications of inhibitors. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021, 134, 111128.
  15. Dal Piaz, V.; Giovannoni, M.P. Phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors, structurally unrelated to rolipram, as promising agents for the treatment of asthma and other pathologies. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 35, 463–480.
  16. Li, H.; Zuo, J.; Tang, W. Phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors for the treatment of inflammatory diseases. Front. Pharmacol. 2018, 9, 1048.
  17. Salari-Sharif, P.; Abdollahi, M. Phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors in inflammatory bowel disease: A comprehensive review. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2010, 16, 3661–3667.
  18. Richter, W.; Menniti, F.S.; Zhang, H.-T.; Conti, M. PDE4 as a target for cognition enhancement. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 2013, 17, 1011–1027.
  19. Wu, C.; Rajagopalan, S. Phosphodiesterase-4 inhibition as a therapeutic strategy for metabolic disorders. Obes. Rev. 2016, 17, 429–441.
  20. Zebda, R.; Paller, A.S. Phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2018, 78, S43–S52.
  21. Mokry, J.; Urbanova, A.; Kertys, M.; Mokra, D. Inhibitors of phosphodiesterases in the treatment of cough. Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol. 2018, 257, 107–114.
  22. Luo, J.; Yang, L.; Yang, J.; Yang, D.; Liu, B.-C.; Liu, D.; Liang, B.M.; Liu, C.-T. Efficacy and safety of phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors in patients with asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Respirology 2018, 23, 467–477.
  23. Bhata, A.; Ray, B.; Mahalakshmi, A.M.; Tuladhar, S.; Nandakumar, D.N.; Srinivasan, M.; Essa, M.M.; Chidambaram, S.B.; Guillemin, G.J.; Sakharkar, M.K. Phosphodiesterase-4 enzyme as a therapeutic target in neurological disorders. Pharmacol. Res. 2020, 160, 105078.
  24. Phillips, J.E. Inhaled phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitors for inflammatory respiratory diseases. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 259.
  25. Peng, T.; Qi, B.; He, J.; Ke, H.; Shi, J. Advances in the development of phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 63, 10594–10617.
  26. Liu, Z.; Liu, M.; Cao, Z.; Qiu, P.; Song, G. Phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors: A review of current developments (2013–2021). Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 2022, 32, 261–278.
  27. Lugnier, C. Cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase (PDE) superfamily: New target for the development of specific therapeutic agents. Pharmacol. Ther. 2006, 109, 366–398.
  28. Soderling, S.H.; Beavo, J.A. Regulation of cAMP and cGMP signaling: New phosphodiesterases and new functions. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2000, 12, 174–179.
  29. Keravis, T.; Lugnier, C. Cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase (PDE) isoenzyme as targets of the intracellular signaling network: Benefits of PDE inhibitors in various diseases and perspective for future therapeutic developments. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2012, 165, 1288–1305.
  30. Eskandari, N.; Mirmosayyeb, O.; Bordbari, G.; Bastan, R.; Yousefi, Z.; Andalib, A. A short review on structure and role of cyclic-3′,5′-adenosine monophosphate-specific phosphodiesterase 4 as a treatment tool. J. Pharm. Pract. Res. 2015, 4, 175–181.
  31. Peng, T.; Gong, J.; Jin, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Tong, R.; Wei, X.; Bai, L.; Shi, J. Inhibitors of phosphodiesterase as cancer therapeutics. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 150, 742–756.
  32. Sakkas, I.L.; Mavropoulos, A.; Bogdanos, P.D. Phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors in immune-mediated diseases: Mode of action, clinical applications, current and future perspectives. Curr. Med. Chem. 2017, 24, 3054–3067.
  33. Card, G.L.; England, B.P.; Suzuki, Y.; Fong, D.; Powell, B.; Lee, B.; Luu, C.; Tabrizizad, M.; Gillette, S.; Ibrahim, P.N.; et al. Structural basis for the activity of drugs that inhibit phosphodiesterases. Structure. 2004, 12, 2233–2247.
  34. Biagini, P.; Biancalani, C.; Graziano, A.; Cesari, N.; Giovannoni, M.P.; Cilibrizzi, A.; Dal Piaz, V.; Vergelli, C.; Crocetti, L.; Del Canale, M.; et al. Functionalized pyrazoles and pyrazolo pyridazinones: Synthesis and evaluation of their phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitory activity. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2010, 18, 3506–3517.
  35. Conti, M.; Richter, W.; Mehats, C.; Livera, G.; Park, J.-Y.; Jin, C. Cyclic AMP-specific PDE4 phosphodiesterases as critical components of cyclic AMP signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 5493–5496.
  36. Houslay, M.D.; Milligan, G. Tailoring cAMP-signaling responses through isoform multiplicity. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1997, 22, 217–224.
  37. Atreya, I.; Atreya, R.; Neurath, M.F. NF-kappaB in inflammatory bowel disease. J. Intern. Med. 2008, 263, 591–596.
  38. Nenci, A.; Becker, C.; Wullaert, A.; Gareus, R.; van Loo, G.; Danese, S.; Huth, M.; Nikolaev, A.; Neufert, C.; Madison, B.; et al. Epithelial NEMO links innate immunity to chronic intestinal inflammation. Nature 2007, 446, 557–561.
  39. Schafer, P.H.; Parton, A.; Capone, L.; Cedzik, D.; Brady, H.; Evans, J.F.; Man, H.W.; Muller, G.W.; Stirling, D.I.; Chopra, R. Apremilast is a selective PDE4 inhibitor with regulatory effects on innate immunity. Cell. Signal. 2014, 26, 2016–2029.
  40. Ollivier, V.; Parry, G.C.; Cobb, R.R.; de Prost, D.; Mackman, N. Elevated cyclic AMP inhibits NF-kappaB-mediated transcription in human monocytic cells and endothelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 20828–20835.
  41. Gobejishvili, L.; Barve, S.; Joshi-Barve, S.; McClain, C. Enhanced PDE4B expression augments LPS-inducible TNF expression in ethanol-primed monocytes: Relevance to alcoholic liver disease. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2008, 295, G718–G724.
  42. Eigler, A.; Siegmund, B.; Emmerich, U.; Baumann, K.H.; Hartmann, G.; Endres, S. Anti-inflammatory activities of cAMP-elevating agents: Enhancement of IL-10 synthesis and concurrent suppression of TNF production. J. Leukoc. Biol. 1998, 63, 101–107.
  43. Essayan, D.M.; Huang, S.K.; Kagey-Sobotka, A.; Lichtenstein, L.M. Differential efficacy of lymphocyte- and monocyte-selective pretreatment with a type 4 phosphodiesterase inhibitor on antigen-driven proliferation and cytokine gene expression. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 1997, 99, 28–37.
  44. Bopp, T.; Becker, C.; Klein, M.; Klein-Hessling, S.; Palmetshofer, A.; Serfling, E.; Heib, V.; Becker, M.; Kubach, J.; Schmitt, S.; et al. Cyclic adenosine monophosphate is a key component of regulatory T cell-mediated suppression. J. Exp. Med. 2007, 204, 1303–1310.
  45. Bopp, T.; Dehzad, N.; Reuter, S.; Klein, M.; Ullrich, N.; Stassen, M.; Schild, H.; Buhl, R.; Schmitt, E.; Taube, C. Inhibition of cAMP degradation improves regulatory T cell-mediated suppression. J. Immunol. 2009, 182, 4017.
  46. Houslay, M.D.; Schafer, P.; Zhang, K.Y. Keynote review: Phosphodiesterase-4 as a therapeutic target. Drug Disc. Today. 2005, 10, 1503–1519.
  47. Jones, N.A.; Boswell-Smith, V.; Lever, R.; Page, C.P. The effect of selective phosphodiesterase isoenzyme inhibition on neutrophil function in vitro. Pulm. Pharmacol. Ther. 2005, 18, 93–101.
  48. Schmiechen, R.; Horowski, R.; Palenschat, D.; Paschelke, G.; Wachtel, H.; Kehr, W. 4-(Polyalkoxyphenyl)-2-pyrrolidinones. U.S. Pat. 4,012,495 (to Sobering, A.G.), 15 March 1977. Available online: https://portal.unifiedpatents.com/patents/patent/US-4012495-A (accessed on 13 July 2022).
  49. Crossland, J. Rolipram. Drugs Future 1988, 13, 38–41.
  50. Parkes, J.D.; Thompson, C.; Brennan, L.; Gajraj, N.; Howcroft, B.; Ruiz, J. Rolipram in Parkinson’s disease. Adv. Neurol. 1984, 40, 563–565.
  51. Schneider, H.H.; Schmiechen, R.; Brezinski, M.; Seidler, J. Stereospecific binding of the antidepressant rolipram to brain protein structures. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1986, 127, 105–115.
  52. Schudt, C.; Tenor, H.; Hatzelmann, A. PDE isoenzymes as targets for anti-asthma drugs. Eur. Respir. J. 1995, 8, 1179–1183.
  53. Iona, S.; Cuomo, M.; Bushnik, T.; Naro, F.; Sette, C.; Hess, M.; Shelton, E.R.; Conti, M. Characterization of the rolipram-sensitive, cyclic AMP-specific phosphodiesterases: Identification and differential expression of immunologically distinct forms in the rat brain. Mol. Pharmacol. 1998, 53, 23–32.
  54. Hartmann, G.; Bidlingmaier, C.; Siegmund, B.; Albrich, S.; Schulze, J.; Tschoep, K.; Eigler, A.; Lehr, H.A.; Endres, S. Specific type IV phosphodiesterase inhibitor rolipram mitigates experimental colitis in mice. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2000, 292, 22–30.
  55. Gobejishvili, L.; Rodriguez, W.E.; Bauer, P.; Wang, Y.; Soni, C.; Lydic, T.; Barve, S.; McClain, C.; Maldonado, C. Novel liposomal rolipram formulation for clinical application to reduce emesis. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 2022, 16, 1301–1309.
  56. Maher, A.; El Sayed, N.; Nafea, H.; Gad, M. Rolipram rescues memory consolidation deficits caused by sleep deprivation: Implication of the cAMP/PKA and cAMP/Epac pathways. CNS Neurol. Disord. Drug Targets. 2022, 21, 631–639.
  57. Brideau, C.; Van Staden, C.; Styhler, A.; Rodger, I.W.; Chan, C.C. The effects of phosphodiesterase type 4 inhibitors on tumour necrosis factor-alpha and leukotriene B4 in a novel human whole blood assay. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1999, 126, 979–988.
  58. McCann, F.E.; Palfreeman, A.C.; Andrews, M.; Perocheau, D.P.; Inglis, J.J.; Schafer, P.; Feldmann, M.; Williams, R.O.; Brennan, F.M. Apremilast, a novel PDE4 inhibitor, inhibits spontaneous production of tumour necrosis factor-alpha from human rheumatoid synovial cells and ameliorates experimental arthritis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2010, 12, R107.
  59. Souness, J.E.; Aldous, D.; Sargent, C. Immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory effects of cyclic AMP phosphodiesterase (PDE) type 4 inhibitors. Immunopharmacology 2000, 47, 127–162.
  60. Harbinson, P.L.; MacLeod, D.; Hawksworth, R.; O’Toole, S.; Sullivan, P.J.; Heath, P.; Kilfeather, S.; Page, C.P.; Costello, J.; Holgate, S.T.; et al. The effect of a novel orally active selective PDE4 isoenzyme inhibitor (CDP840) on allergen-induced responses in asthmatic subjects. Eur. Respir. J. 1997, 10, 1008–1014.
  61. Barnette, M.S.; Underwood, D.C. New phosphodiesterase inhibitors as therapeutics for the treatment of chronic lung disease. Curr. Opin. Pulm. Med. 2000, 6, 164–169.
  62. Wollin, L.; Bundschuh, D.S.; Wohlsen, A.; Marx, D.; Beume, R. Inhibition of airway hyperresponsiveness and pulmonary inflammation by roflumilast and other PDE4 inhibitors. Pulm. Pharmacol. Ther. 2006, 19, 343–352.
  63. Giembycz, M.A. Phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors and the treatment of asthma: Where are we now and where do we go from here? Drugs 2000, 59, 193–212.
  64. Souness, J.E.; Rao, S. Proposal for pharmacologically distinct conformers of PDE4 cyclic AMP phosphodiesterases. Cell Signal. 1997, 9, 227–236.
  65. Duplantier, A.J.; Biggers, M.S.; Chambers, R.J.; Cheng, J.B.; Cooper, K.; Damon, D.B.; Eggler, J.F.; Kraus, K.G.; Marfat, A.; Masamune, H.; et al. Biarylcarboxylic acids and -amides: Inhibition of phosphodiesterase type IV versus rolipram binding activity and their relationship to emetic behavior in the ferret. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 120–125.
  66. Paes, D.; Schepers, M.; Rombaut, B.; van den Hove, D.; Vanmierlo, T.; Prickaerts, J. The molecular biology of phosphodiesterase 4 enzymes as pharmacological targets: An interplay of isoforms, conformational states, and inhibitors. Pharmacol. Rev. 2021, 73, 1016–1049.
  67. Robichaud, A.; Stamatiou, P.B.; Jin, S.L.; Lachance, N.; Macdonald, D.; Laliberte, F.; Liu, S.; Huang, Z.; Conti, M.; Chan, C.C. Deletion of phosphodiesterase 4D in mice shortens alpha(2)- adrenoceptor-mediated anesthesia, a behavioral correlate of emesis. J. Clin. Invest. 2002, 110, 1045–1052.
  68. Burgin, A.B.; Magnusson, O.T.; Singh, J.; Witte, P.; Staker, B.L.; Bjornsson, J.M.; Thorsteinsdottir, M.; Hrafnsdottir, S.; Hagen, T.; Kiselyov, A.S.; et al. Design of phosphodiesterase 4D (PDE4D) allosteric modulators for enhancing cognition with improved safety. Nat. Biotechnol. 2010, 28, 63–72.
  69. Naganuma, K.; Omura, A.; Maekawara, N.; Saitoh, M.; Ohkawa, N.; Kubota, T.; Nagumo, H.; Kodama, T.; Takemura, M.; Ohtsuka, Y.; et al. Discovery of selective PDE4B inhibitors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 3174–3176.
  70. Wedzicha, J.A.; Calverley, P.M.A.; Rabe, K.F. Roflumilast: A review of its use in the treatment of COPD. Int. J. Chron. Obstruct. Pulmon. Dis. 2016, 11, 81–90.
  71. Woo, T.E.; Kuzel, P. Crisaborole 2% ointment (eucrisa) for atopic dermatitis. Skin Ther. Lett. 2019, 24, 4–6.
  72. Dozier, L.; Bartos, G.; Kerdel, F. Apremilast and psoriasis in the real world: A retrospective case series. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2019, 83, 221–222.
  73. Rolan, P.; Hutchinson, M.; Johnson, K. Ibudilast: A review of its pharmacology, efficacy and safety in respiratory and neurological disease. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2009, 10, 2897–2904.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!
Video Production Service
Feedback