Citrus Breeding 2.0 in Japan: History
View Latest Version
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Contributor:
Tokurou Shimizu

Developing varieties with diverse features that satisfy varied commercial needs, improving overall fruit quality, and quickly releasing them, are prerequisites in citrus breeding. However, these three goals require trade-offs in conventional breeding, even with the application of the marker-assisted selection technique. Conventional breeding cannot achieve these three goals simultaneously and it has been regarded as a breeding trilemma. Integrating a genomics-assisted breeding (GAB) approach that relies on quantitative trait locus detection by genome-wide association study and genome-wide prediction of a trait by genomic selection using enriched marker genotypes enhances breeding efficiency and contributes to eliminating the trilemma. Besides these efforts, the analysis of the genealogy of indigenous citrus varieties revealed that many high-quality indigenous varieties were selected within a few generations. It suggested that selecting a new premium quality hybrid is possible by integrating it with the GAB technique and helps avoid the trilemma. Researchers describe an ongoing comprehensive approach for integrating genomic-assisted breeding (GAB) with citrus genealogy on citrus breeding, called Citrus Breeding 2.0. This method can develop new cultivars with premium quality in a short period.

  • citrus breeding
  • marker-assisted selection
  • genomics-assisted breeding
  • genome-wide association study
  • genomic selection
  • genealogy

1. Introduction

Major citrus cultivars such as sweet orange, Clementine, lemon, grapefruit, and Satsuma have been produced worldwide for over 100 years, and are still considered economically important crops [1][2]. However, the demand has increased for high-quality new cultivars easy-to-peel and which meet consumers’ needs in a short period [3]. Tremendous efforts have been devoted to mutation breeding in citrus to select a cultivar from sport, nucellar seedling [4][5][6][7], or after irradiation [8]. Though mutation breeding has successfully selected spontaneous or induced mutants in various varieties based on color break, rind or flesh color, fruit shape, acidity, or sugar content, mutation occurs at a low frequency [9], and the mutation spectrum depends on the varieties used for the method [3][5][6][7]. These limitations hamper the use of mutation breeding as a ubiquitous method for the development of new varieties. In contrast, crossbreeding is beneficial for developing novel, high-quality cultivars; however, in conventional breeding, it requires more time than mutation breeding, and the possibility to obtain a new elite hybrid depends on both the breeder’s experience and chance.
Crossbreeding is a systematic approach for developing new cultivars with novel traits using hybridization [3][10][11]. However, it requires maintaining many seedlings in the orchard for an extended period and repeatedly evaluating their characteristics, and consequently this lengthy process is time-consuming and expensive. Therefore, in conventional breeding, satisfying fast breeding of a new hybrid, increasing fruit trait variation, and improving overall fruit quality are trade-offs, and it is difficult to achieve them simultaneously [12]. This constraint is regarded as a ‘breeding trilemma’ that is difficult to avoid in conventional breeding [13]. To solve these constraints in conventional breeding, the marker-assisted selection (MAS) technique has been introduced in citrus breeding [12]. However, conventional MAS is limited to specific traits controlled by a few genes, and it is difficult to efficiently select various fruit traits that involve multiple genes in complex ways.

2. Citrus Crossbreeding Effort Aims to Improve Fruit Quality

2.1. Past Efforts of the Citrus Breeding Program in NARO

The fruit tree breeding program aims to develop new and unique high-quality cultivars. The citrus crossbreeding program of the Institute of Fruit Tree and Tea Science, NARO (NIFTS) started in 1946 and has produced hybrid cultivars intended for the domestic market [14]. To date, the program has developed 39 hybrid cultivars with eight intermediary mother selections by repeatedly selecting a superior hybrid from a single cross. When the breeding program started, Satsuma, sweet orange, ponkan mandarin, and pummelo were typical in Japan, but each cultivar had drawbacks. For instance, although Satsuma is easy-to-peel, seedless, and productive, it has less flavor and a lower sugar content than oranges and exhibits alternate bearing. Sweet orange sets fruits with high sugar content and a strong and excellent aroma that is suitable for direct consumption and juice production. However, the rind of the sweet orange is hard to peel and requires a knife to eat. Ponkan mandarin has a preferred flavor and higher sugar content than Satsuma, but it has a puffy rind and contains many seeds that hamper eating. Pummelo is the generic name of a set of cultivars that produce large fruit with a thick yellow rind. These pummelo sets fruits with a high soluble solid content (SSC) and pleasant aroma. But they are difficult to peel, set many seeds, and the segment membrane is difficult to chew. The initial goal of the program was to develop a new cultivar with peelability comparable with Satsuma and a preferable aroma similar to sweet orange. ‘Kiyomi’ is a tangor selected from a cross between Satsuma and a sweet orange cross [15]. ‘Kiyomi’ had better peelability than sweet orange, but not comparable to Satsuma, and while its aroma was superior to that of Satsuma, it was not comparable to sweet orange.
Besides its fruits, ‘Kiyomi’ has played a pivotal role in the breeding program, and it has been used as a mother plant because of its monoembryony (Figure 1). ‘Kiyomi’ has contributed to the development of ten hybrid cultivars (‘Seihou’, ‘Tsunokaori’, ‘Youkou’, ‘Harumi’, ‘Akemi’, ‘Amaka’, ‘Nishinokaori’, ‘Tamami’, ‘Tsunonozomi’, and ‘Shiranuhi’), and six cultivars (‘Amakusa’, ‘Setoka’, ‘Harehime’, ‘Reikou’, ‘Tsunokagayaki’, and ‘Asumi’) are its progeny (Figure 1 and Table 1). These cultivars expanded the harvest season for five months (August to April) at open culture, enlarged fruit size (150–280 g), and improved SSC (>15). All of these cultivars except ‘Amakusa’, ‘Tamami’, and ‘Tsunonozomi’ set seedless fruit in open fields. Most of them are comparable to Satsuma in that they are easy to peel, and the segment membrane is easy to chew (Table 1). Many of these cultivars have “good” flavor; among which, ‘Harehime’, ‘Tamami’ and ‘Asumi’ have a strong and excellent aroma similar to that of sweet orange. In addition, some of these cultivars have unique features for less rind puffing (‘Tsunokaori’, ‘Tsunonozomi’), less alternate bearing (‘Amakusa’), grenadine to red rind (‘Akemi’, ‘Reikou’), rich in beta-cryptoxanthin (‘Tsunokagayaki’, ‘Asumi’) and unique fruit shape (‘Shiranuhi’). All these cultivars are protected under the Plant Variety Protection and Seed Act, Japan except ‘Shiranuhi’ [16], which is now produced in the USA (‘Sumo citrus’), Korea (‘Hallabong’), and Brazil (‘Kinsei’). Thus, starting from ‘Kiyomi’, a series of cultivars that have diverse and improved traits have been bred through several crossings. It demonstrates the performance of crossbreeding that enables the expansion of diversity and improvement of fruit quality.
Figure 1. Pedigree tree of ‘Kiyomi’ tangor with its offspring cultivars. Connector line terminating in a circle denotes seed parent, straight end denotes pollen parent.
Table 1. List of the offspring cultivars of ‘Kiyomi’. YTD: Years to development, SL: seedless (<5 seeds per fruit), BCP: beta-cryptoxanthin, SSC: soluble solid content.
Cultivar Year of Release YTD Harvest Fruit Size
(g)		 Peelability Seeds Features
Kiyomi 1979 30 Late March ~200 Moderate SL A tangor (mandarin x orange). Orange-like aroma and juicy
Seihou 1988 17 Late January ~200 Hard SL Large fruit with orange-like good flavor and soft flesh
Tshunokaori 1990 18 March–April ~160 Easy SL High SSC (>13), and no rind-puffing
Amakusa 1993 11 August–January ~200 Hard -- High SSC (>12), and less alternate bearing
Youkou 1995 23 January–February 250–300 Easy SL Large fruit with good flavor and soft flesh
Harumi 1996 17 January 180–200 Easy SL Large fruit with good flavor and soft flesh
Akemi 1996 21 March 160–180 Moderate SL High SSC (>12), grenadine rind, and soft flesh
Amaka 1996 22 August–January 200–250 Easy SL Soft fruit with good orange-like aroma
Nishinokaori 1997 31 August–January 100–180 Easy SL High SSC (>12), orange-like flavor, and soft flesh
Setoka 1998 14 February 200–280 Easy SL Large fruit with good flavor, high SSC (>12), and soft flesh
Harehime 2001 11 August 180 Easy SL Early type with good flavor, juicy, and soft flesh
Tamami 2004 24 January 150 Easy -- High SSC (>12) and good orange-like flavor
Reikou 2004 20 January 210 Moderate SL High SSC (>12), good flavor, and red-skin
Tsunokagayaki 2008 24 January–February 180–250 Easy SL High SSC (>13), soft fruit, BCP rich, and suitable for greenhouse production
Tsunonozomi 2011 37 August 190 Easy -- Early type with good flavor, high SSC (>12), juicy, and less rind puffing
Asumi 2013 21 February 150 Moderate SL Very high SSC (>15), orange-like flavor, and BCP rich
Shiranuhi *     February–March 230 Easy SL High SSC (>14), soft fruit, good flavor, and unique fruit shape
* Not patented.

2.2. Constraints of Conventional Crossbreeding

Most fruit traits are susceptible to environmental variation. Therefore, conventional crossbreeding methods maintain many seedlings in the orchard for an extended period to evaluate their traits for several years to minimize the influence of potential variations. Alternate bearing is another drawback of some citrus fruits. Evaluating fruit traits at least twice is essential for reliable performance evaluation. However, it requires significant effort to maintain thousands of seedlings for the selection of just one elite hybrid. The NARO citrus breeding program took an average of 22.8 years to develop one promising selection from a cross (11–28 years) [13]. The breeding program provides approximately 5000 seeds each year for selection and then evaluates them for approximately 20 years; however, only one promising hybrid emerges every few years, and the rest are discarded. This means that even seedlings that will eventually be discarded must be maintained in the field for an extended period, and evaluation in the field is mandatory to determine which will be discarded and which will ultimately be selected. This step is time-consuming and incurs high costs over a long period to maintain the seedlings. Therefore, the cost of breeding a new cultivar can be reduced by increasing the number of promising hybrids acquired per seedling evaluated.
In the conventional breeding approach in NARO, the germinated seeds are nurtured for one to two years, after which a portion of them will be selected empirically for grafting at the orchard. The fruit traits of the seedlings selected for grafting are then evaluated for several years, and if any of them show promise, they will be subjected to further evaluation. Developing a high-quality new, unique hybrid is required to adjust for the broad array of consumer preferences [3][11]. In addition, there is now a need to breed new cultivars in the shortest possible period to adjust for rapid changes in the market [12]. The citrus breeding program of NARO aims to achieve for satisfying three goals simultaneously: releasing new cultivars quickly, developing new cultivars that satisfy varied commercial needs, and improving overall fruit quality. However, satisfying these three objectives necessitates trade-offs—prioritizing one makes it difficult to achieve the others. Among those goals, the low probability of obtaining a promising hybrid from a set of the provided seedlings forms the background of the breeding trilemma. The insufficient number of candidate hybrids obtained from a single cross that causes generations needing to be repeated, prolonging the duration for breeding.

3. Suggestions from the Citrus Genealogy for Breeding

3.1. Genomic Breeding Aims to Avoid the Breeding Trilemma

In citrus breeding, the longest part of the breeding period consists of the long juvenile period until first blooming (6–7 years) and the period required for trait evaluation in the field. GAB is an emerging technology to improve breeding efficiency by rapidly selecting promising individuals of high quality [17][18]. This approach aims to avoid the breeding trilemma, but selection by MAS and GS alone is not sufficient to shorten the time required for breeding. ‘Fast breeding’ that intends to develop unique, unconventional cultivars in the shortest possible time is another constraint to the breeding trilemma [13]. Minimizing the time from crossing to the selection of an elite hybrid in each generation would be effective in achieving fast breeding. However, most citrus cultivars have long juvenile periods, and alternate bearing that hampers the trait evaluation in the short term is severe in young citrus trees. It extends the period for repeating the trait evaluation to maintain accuracy, making the whole breeding process long. The citrus breeding program in NARO evaluates over 20 traits. The current prediction accuracy in citrus by GS is up to 80% for particular traits, but other traits do not reach this level [19]. That means traits that MAS or GS cannot select or are less predictable need to be evaluated in the field, along with confirming the traits selected by MAS or GS. Therefore, even if using GAB, a drastic reduction in the breeding period cannot be expected because both MAS and GS are the selection method, not the methods that shorten the juvenile period. Furthermore, considering the period required for a single generation (over 20 years), achieving a breeding process that had required several generations by the conventional methods within a single generation will drastically shorten the time required for developing a cultivar.
The conventional breeding program often uses existing superior cultivars as parents. Although this approach ensures that breeders develop a new hybrid of high quality in a short period, crosses between similar cultivars lower the novelty of the hybrid breed. Using cultivars not used as breeding parents to cross may contribute to enlarging the diversity of hybrids and selecting a novel individual. While providing these unfamiliar cultivars for breeding is expected to contribute to developing individuals with novel traits, the multiple unwanted traits of the parent may decrease the ratio of individuals that exceed the selection threshold. Although few studies have examined the inheritance of quantitative fruit traits in citrus, Combrink et al. showed the continuous distribution of the height and width of fruit in six offspring populations developed from different cultivars, using Kiyomi as the common female plant [20]. They used six cultivars whose fruit sizes are smaller than Kiyomi for the male plants. The study showed that the medians of fruit widths and height of the six populations were close to that of another parent that set fruit smaller than Kiyomi. Their results strongly suggested that more seedlings could be required to select individuals of larger fruit sizes than Kiyomi when crossing Kiyomi with a small fruit cultivar. In contrast, these parental cultivars’ fruit shape indexes (ratio of fruit width per fruit height) showed no considerable differences and a narrow distribution. Although medians of the fruit shape indexes of these populations were close to those of parental cultivars, a few individuals showed substantial differences from their parents for the fruit shape index [20]. They also revealed that rind color factors (L* and a*) of the same six populations of Kiyomi showed similar distributions in their offspring populations as observed in fruit size in another study [21].
Fruit size is one of the primary traits for selection in the NARO citrus breeding program that uses Kiyomi to cross frequently, as demonstrated in Figure 1. Many cultivars that have not been used for breeding set small fruits in the program. Thus, as demonstrated by Combrink et al. [20], the average fruit size of the population is smaller than Kiyomi and is an obstacle when using a small fruit cultivar for crossing to expand the diversity. These results were examined for five fruit traits in populations of Kiyomi as the common parent, and great care must be taken to expand the finding to all crosses and fruit traits. However, these results strongly suggest that it is challenging in conventional breeding to develop new hybrid cultivars that exceed the threshold on the broad traits in a single generation because using non-elite cultivars would suppress the occurrence of promising individuals in a population.
For example, NARO recently released the ‘Aurastar’ [22], ‘Nou No. 7’, and ‘Nou No. 8’ cultivars [23]. These are second-generation trifoliate oranges (TF) obtained by crossing Hassaku × TF ‘Flying dragon’ followed by crossing with Banpeiyu pummelo or Kiyomi to introduce resistance to the citrus tristeza virus of TF into the commercial cultivars [22][23]. Although these have improved fruit traits compared to TF, they retain the unpleasant odor of TF and are inedible. Thus, they require further introgression of genomes of edible citrus cultivars. This is a typical example of the breeding trilemma. Serra et al. proposed an approach (Marker-Assisted Introgression; MAI) to shorten the generation required for the introgression of a distant cross with MAS in peach [24]. Despite the use of the MAI approach, it requires several generations and avoiding a lengthy breeding period is difficult in citrus. Therefore, a different approach is needed to resolve the trilemma.

3.2. Lessons from the Revealed Genealogy of Citrus Cultivars

Understanding how existing indigenous citrus cultivars have been selected would provide clues to improve breeding efficiency and resolve the trilemma. A recent study revealed that modern citrus species emerged from iterated hybridization of ancestral citrus cultivars between China and India approximately 9 million years ago [25][26]. Although the process by which current indigenous citrus cultivars were established had long been unknown, Shimizu et al. revealed the pedigree of over 60 of these cultivars [27]. Tanaka classified more than 160 indigenous citrus ‘species’ [28][29]. However, these results confirmed that most of these ‘species’ are natural hybrids and thus cannot be classified as individual species [27].
The study of citrus genealogy provided important suggestions: (1) Repeated crossing of several key cultivars, such as Kishu, Kunenbo, Yuzu, and pummelo, has led to the current diverse group of cultivars within a few generations. This indicates that the genetic diversity of those indigenous cultivars has decreased, and Shimizu et al. [27] confirmed this using SSR marker analysis. (2) Fruit traits such as size, shape, color, rind thickness, SSC, acidity, and peelability had changed significantly in just one generation. This suggests that repeated generations are not always essential to produce an elite hybrid. (3) The elucidated genealogies indicate that cultivars not previously used in breeding were the parents of several unique cultivars. Using these unfamiliar exotic cultivars as breeding parents would be helpful in developing new cultivars with novel traits.

3.3. Hybrids Selected from Kishu and Kunenbo

Kishu (C. kinokuni hort. ex Tanaka) is an ancient cultivar that has been known since at least 740 A.D. in Japan [30]. Shimizu et al. demonstrated that Kishu served as the direct parent of 12 cultivars (Kunenbo, Satsuma, Yatsushiro, Naruto, Oukan, Natsudaidai, Nidonari mikan, Fukure mikan, Suruga Yuko, Sokitsu, Sanbokan, and Andokan) and as the indirect parent of 24 cultivars (Jabara, Mochiyu, Kabosu, Henka mikan, Kizu, Konkoji, Hyoukan, Hassaku, Asahikan, Kaikoukan, Yamabuki, Iyo, USSR tangelo, Shunkokan, Kawabata, Unzoki, Kabuchi, Keraji, Yuge hyoukan, Ujutkitsu, Kawachi bankan, Sanbokan, Andokan, and Yuukunibu) through Naruto (C. medioglobosa hort. ex Tanaka) or Kunenbo (C. nobilis Lour. var. kunep Tanaka) [27]. Kunenbo is an offspring of Kishu, crossed with an unidentified seed parent [27]. This was confirmed using whole-genome sequencing analysis [31].
Comparing the parental Kishu and Kunenbo with their offspring cultivars shows the changes in fruit size, rind color, and rind smoothness between them (Figure 2). Fruit cross-sections also show the changes in flesh color, rind thickness, and the number of seeds. Although not apparent from the images, variation is also observed among these cultivars in many traits, such as sugar and acid content, coloring time and aroma, and flesh quality. These trait variations do not differ from those found in the population of a single cross in citrus. The probability of obtaining an elite candidate with superior traits, such as Satsuma, from a single cross between Kishu and Kunenbo is supposed to be very low. Therefore, with the current systematic breeding program, the possibility of selecting an individual with traits comparable to those of Satsuma is insignificant.
Figure 2. Pedigree of Kishu (C. kinokuni hort. ex Tanaka) and Kunenbo (C. nobilis Lour. var. kunep Tanaka). A question mark indicates an unidentified parent. The numbers in squares indicate the first cross of Kishu to produce Kunenbo (1), then the second cross of Kishu with Kunenbo to produce Satsuma and Yatsushiro (2).
Satsuma was discovered in Japan around 1648 [32]. One factor that enabled the selection of Satsuma from a cross between Kishu and Kunenbo when no systematic breeding system was available was adjacent cultivation of these that facilitate natural hybridization [30]. There were many such areas in Japan with seeds obtained and discarded every year. Satsuma would be selected over several decades from the seedlings germinated from these discarded seeds. This indicates that it is possible to select a high-quality elite hybrid within a single generation by taking sufficient time for selection, even without conducting modern systematic breeding.

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/horticulturae8060559

References

  1. Webber, H.J. History and development of the citrus industry. In The Citrus Industry I.; Reuther, W., Webber, H.J., Batchelor, L.D., Eds.; University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA, 1967; pp. 1–39.
  2. Food and Agriculture Organization, Intergovernmental Group on Citrus Fruits. Citrus Fruit Statistics 2015; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2016.
  3. Caruso, M.; Smith, M.W.; Froelicher, Y.; Russo, G.; Gmitter, F.G. Traditional breeding. In The Genus Citrus; Elsevier: Duxford, UK, 2020; pp. 129–148.
  4. Nishiura, M. Citrus breeding through nucellar seedling selection. JARQ Jpn. Agric. Res. Q. 1967, 2, 15–19.
  5. Lamo, K.; Ji Bhat, D.; Kour, K.; Singh Solanki, S.P. Mutation Studies in Fruit Crops: A Review. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2017, 6, 3620–3633.
  6. Kamatyanatt, M.; Singh, S.K.; Sekhon, B.S. Mutation breeding in citrus—A review. Plant Cell Biotechnol. Mol. Biol. 2021, 22, 1–8.
  7. Roose, M.L.; Williams, T.E. Mutation breeding. In Citrus Genetics, Breeding and Biotechnology; Khan, I.A., Ed.; CABI, CAB International: Oxfordshire, UK, 2007; pp. 345–352. ISBN 978-0851990194.
  8. Cimen, B.; Yesiloglu, T.; Incesu, M.; Yilmaz, B. Studies on mutation breeding in citrus: Improving seedless types of ‘Kozan’ common orange by gamma irradiation. Sci. Hortic. 2021, 278, 109857.
  9. Iwamasa, M.; Yamaguchi, S.; Kuriyama, T.; Nakamuta, T.; Ehara, T.; Nito, N.; Katayama, Y. Occurrence of very early mutants from the wase (early ripening) satsumas and their characteristics. Bull. Fac. Agric. Saga Univ. 1984, 55, 99–107.
  10. Ollitrault, P.; Navarro, L. Citrus. In Fruit Breeding; Badenes, M.L., Byrne, D.H., Eds.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 2012; pp. 623–662. ISBN 9781441907639.
  11. Raveh, E.; Goldenberg, L.; Porat, R.; Carmi, N.; Gentile, A.; La Malfa, S. Conventional Breeding of Cultivated Citrus Varieties. In The Citrus Genome; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 33–48.
  12. Shimizu, T.; Aka Kacar, Y.; Cristofani-Yaly, M.; Curtolo, M.; Machado, M.A. Markers, Maps, and Marker-Assisted Selection. In The Citrus Genome; Gentile, A., La Malfa, S.D.Z., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 107–139. ISBN 978-3-030-10799-4.
  13. Shimizu, T. Citrus Breeding 2.0: A novel approach integrating deciphered parentage and genomics-assisted selection. JARQ Jpn. Agric. Res. Q. 2019, 53, 81–85.
  14. Nishiura, M. Citrus breeding and bud selection in Japan. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 1964, 77, 79–83.
  15. Nishiura, M.; Shichijo, T.; Ueno, I.; Iwamasa, M.; Kihara, T.; Yamada, Y.; Yoshida, T.; Iwasaki, T. New citrus cultivar “Kiyomi” tangor. Bull. Fruit Tree Res. Stn. Ser. B Okitsu 1983, 10, 1–9. (In Japanese)
  16. NARO: National Agriculture and Food Research Organization List of the Citrus Bred Varieties. Available online: https://www.naro.go.jp/laboratory/nifts/kih/hinshu/citrus_cat/index.html (accessed on 10 April 2022). (In Japanese).
  17. Shimizu, T. Genomic breeding. In The Genus Citrus; Talon, M., Gmitter, F., Caruso, M., Eds.; Elsevier: Duxford, UK, 2020; pp. 149–169. ISBN 978-0-12-812163-4.
  18. Iwata, H.; Minamikawa, M.F.; Kajiya-Kanegae, H.; Ishimori, M.; Hayashi, T. Genomics-assisted breeding in fruit trees. Breed. Sci. 2016, 66, 100–115.
  19. Minamikawa, M.F.; Nonaka, K.; Kaminuma, E.; Kajiya-Kanegae, H.; Onogi, A.; Goto, S.; Yoshioka, T.; Imai, A.; Hamada, H.; Hayashi, T.; et al. Genome-wide association study and genomic prediction in citrus: Potential of genomics-assisted breeding for fruit quality traits. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 4721.
  20. Combrink, N.K.; Labuschagne, M.T.; Bijzet, Z. Variation of fruit size and shape in Kiyomi tangor families. Sci. Hortic. 2013, 162, 357–364.
  21. Combrink, N.K.; Bijzet, Z.; Sippel, A.D.; Booyse, M.; Labuschagne, M.T. Genotypic variation of rind colour in citrus tangor Kiyomi families. Acta Hortic. 2015, 1065, 439–448.
  22. Kita, M.; Nesumi, H.; Kuniga, T.; Nakajima, N.; Yoshioka, T.; Ohta, S.; Takishita, F.; Nakano, M.; Ogawa, K.; Yoshida, T.; et al. New Citrus Cultivar ‘Aurastar’. J. NARO Res. Dev. 2021, 7, 1–8. (In Japanese)
  23. Yoshida, T.; Nesumi, H.; Nakajima, N.; Kuniga, T. New citrus parental lines “Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 7 Gou” and “Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 8 Gou” for breeding new cultivars with immunity to citrus tristeza virus. Jpn. J. Hortic. Sci. 2005, 74, 323. (In Japanese)
  24. Serra, O.; Donoso, J.M.; Picañol, R.; Batlle, I.; Howad, W.; Eduardo, I.; Arús, P. Marker-assisted introgression (MAI) of almond genes into the peach background: A fast method to mine and integrate novel variation from exotic sources in long intergeneration species. Tree Genet. Genomes 2016, 12, 96.
  25. Wu, G.A.; Terol, J.; Ibanez, V.; López-García, A.; Pérez-Román, E.; Borredá, C.; Domingo, C.; Tadeo, F.R.; Carbonell-Caballero, J.; Alonso, R.; et al. Genomics of the origin and evolution of Citrus. Nature 2018, 554, 311–316.
  26. Wu, G.A.; Sugimoto, C.; Kinjo, H.; Azama, C.; Mitsube, F.; Talon, M.; Gmitter, F.G.; Rokhsar, D.S. Diversification of mandarin citrus by hybrid speciation and apomixis. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 4377.
  27. Shimizu, T.; Kitajima, A.; Nonaka, K.; Yoshioka, T.; Ohta, S.; Goto, S.; Toyoda, A.; Fujiyama, A.; Mochizuki, T.; Nagasaki, H.; et al. Hybrid origins of citrus varieties inferred from DNA marker analysis of nuclear and organelle genomes. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0166969.
  28. Tanaka, T. Species Problem in Citrus: A Critical Study of Wild and Cultivated Units of Citrus, Based upon Field Studies in Their Native Homes (Revisio Aurantiacearum IX); Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science: Tokyo, Japan, 1954.
  29. Tanaka, T. A Revision of Osmocitrus, a section of the genus Citrus: Revisio Aurantiacearum XIII. Bull. Univ. Osaka Prefect. Ser. B Agric. Biol. 1960, 10, 9–13.
  30. Shimizu, T.; Kitajima, A.; Nonaka, K.; Yoshioka, T.; Ohta, S.; Goto, S.; Kaminuma, E.; Nakamura, Y. A model for the domestication and diversification processes of modern citrus cultivars in Japan. In Proceedings of the IV International Symposium on Citrus Biotechnology, Canelones, Uruguay, 16–18 April 2018; pp. 7–14.
  31. Shimizu, T.; Tanizawa, Y.; Mochizuki, T.; Nagasaki, H.; Yoshioka, T.; Toyoda, A.; Fujiyama, A.; Kaminuma, E.; Nakamura, Y. Draft sequencing of the heterozygous diploid genome of Satsuma (Citrus unshiu Marc.) using a hybrid assembly approach. Front. Genet. 2017, 8, 180.
  32. Tanaka, T. On the origin, affinity and scientific name of the Satsuma orange (2). Stud. Citrol. 1927, 1, 26–41. (In Japanese)
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!
ScholarVision Creations
Feedback