Graphene-Oxide-Derived Nanomaterials for the Extraction of Metals: History
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Graphene oxide is a compound with a form similar to graphene, composed of carbon atoms in a sp2 single-atom layer of a hybrid connection. Due to its significant surface area and its good mechanical and thermal stability, graphene oxide has a plethora of applications in various scientific fields including heterogenous catalysis, gas storage, environmental remediation, etc. In analytical chemistry, graphene oxide has been successfully employed for the extraction and preconcentration of organic compounds, metal ions, and proteins. 

  • graphene oxide
  • sample preparation
  • metal ions
  • food samples
  • environmental samples
  • biological samples
  • agricultural samples

1. Introduction

Among environmental pollutants, metals are of high importance due to their potential toxic effects and tendency to bioaccumulate in aquatic ecosystems. In small quantities, certain metals like iron, copper, cobalt, manganese, and zinc are nutritionally essential for a healthy life, while other metals such as mercury, arsenic, chromium, cadmium, and lead have no known role in biological systems and they are considered toxic and extremely dangerous even at trace levels [1][2][3]. The instrumental spectroscopic techniques commonly used for the determination of metals are flame atomic absorption spectroscopy (FAAS) [4], cold vapor atomic absorption spectroscopy (CVAAS) [5], electrothermal atomic absorption spectroscopy (ETAAS) [6], inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) [7], and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) [8]. Metal ions are present in environmental samples at ultra-trace concentrations and, due to the existence of potential interferences and the complexity of matrices, the implementation of an extraction and preconcentration technique is required for their efficient determination [9][10].
A wide variety of novel sorbents including graphene, graphene oxide, carbon nanotubes, metal–organic frameworks, covalent organic frameworks, and zeolitic imidazole frameworks have been employed for the extraction of metal ions [11][12][13][14][15][16]. Those materials have been utilized in a wide range of analytical sample preparation techniques including dispersive solid phase extraction (d-SPE) [17], magnetic solid-phase extraction (MSPE) [18], pipette tip solid-phase extraction (PT-SPE) [19], solid phase microextraction (SPME) [20], stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) [21], etc.
Graphene is a non-polar hydrophobic carbon-based nanomaterial that was discovered by Geim et al. in 2004 [22]. Since then, graphene has attracted a lot of attention due to its extraordinary mechanical, thermal, structural, and electronic properties, as well as its high specific surface area. It consists of a single layer of carbon atoms densely packed in a honeycomb crystal lattice that forms graphite sheets. Applications of graphene include preparation of nanocomposites, heterogenous catalysis, drug delivery, gas storage, molecular probing, and electrochemical sensors [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. However, graphene is insoluble and hard to disperse in most solvents because of strong intermolecular van der Waals interactions [31].
Graphene oxide (GO) is the oxidized form of graphene, which can be obtained from natural graphite powder through oxidation with an anhydrous mixture of sulfuric acid, sodium nitrate, and potassium permanganate [32]. Graphene and graphene oxide show a similar structure, which is composed of carbon atoms in sp2 hybridization linked within a single-atom layer [33][34][35]. GO is of more polar and hydrophilic character than graphene, since it contains a large number of oxygen-containing groups including hydroxyl, carboxyl, and epoxy groups. Graphene oxide sheets are negatively charged in aqueous solutions due to the ionization of carboxylic groups and since they contain oxygen atoms with a lone pair of electrons, they are ideal sorbents to bind metal ions both through ionic and coordinative interaction. The adsorbed metal ions can be subsequently eluted with the addition of acid with the H+ competing for the binding site [10][35][36].
Due to the two-dimensional plane structure of GO, the material has a high sorption capacity and is an excellent sorbent for solid-phase extraction. A limitation of graphene oxide is the significant π–π stacking interactions between the GO nanosheets, which lead to aggregation and restacking of the nanosheets. As a result, some active adsorption sites of the adsorbent are blocked and thus its specific surface area is reduced. Functionalization of graphene oxide can take place in order to prevent aggregation, improve its behavior in aqueous solutions, and enhance its selectivity towards the target metal ion and/or the extraction efficiency of the sorbent. Moreover, GO can form magnetic nanocomposites with Fe3O4 nanoparticles through electrostatic interactions between the negatively charged GO nanosheets and the positively charged surface of magnetite. The magnetic nanocomposites combine the high adsorption efficiency of GO and the convenience of magnetic separation of Fe3O4 nanoparticles [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44].

2. Synthesis of Graphene-Oxide-Derived Materials

Hummers′ method with or without modification is the most common synthetic route for the preparation of graphene oxide. Typically, graphite is dispersed in sulfuric acid and the dispersion is stirred. Subsequently, potassium permanganate is added dropwise to prevent a temperature rise. The resulting brownish slurry is diluted in water and final addition of hydrogen peroxide takes place. The mixture is centrifuged and washed with hydrochloric acid and water. Finally, filtration and freeze-drying of the obtained GO material take place [32].
Magnetic graphene oxide (GO/Fe3O4) can be produced by various synthetic routes. The one-step chemical co-precipitation approach is the most common approach for the preparation of magnetic graphene oxide. In this case, graphene oxide is dispersed in water, salts of Fe2+ and Fe3+ are added in appropriate concentrations, and the mixture is heated under reflux. Subsequently, ammonia is added dropwise to precipitate the ferric and ferrous ions. Graphene oxide can be also prepared with the solvothermal approach or by subjecting a mixture of GO and Fe3O4 to stirring, mechanical shaking, or ultrasonic treatment [45][46][47][48].
Reduced graphene oxide (RGO) is a nanomaterial obtained by chemical reduction of graphene oxide. RGO contains fewer oxygen groups than GO and reduction leads to an increase in the porosity as a result of exfoliation and rearrangement of layers [49]. RGO can be easily synthesized by dispersing GO in water and using hydrazine hydrate as a reductant. The reduction is normally carried out under stirring and heating. Magnetic RGO can be also prepared by approaches similar to those for the preparation of GO/Fe3O4, such as chemical co-precipitation, solvothermal, or hydrothermal approaches. In this way, the benefits of RGO and magnetic nanoparticles are combined to prepare highly efficient sorbents. Other reduction methods including electrochemical reduction, thermal reduction, microwave and photo reduction, photo-catalyst reduction, and reduction with green chemicals (e.g., ascorbic acid) can also be implemented for the preparation of RGO from GO [50][51][52]
Functionalization of graphene oxide can be employed in order to increase its potential applications. The functional modification of graphene oxide can not only maintain its excellent properties, but it also introduces new functional groups able to provide new characteristic to the sorbent. For this purpose, multifunctional organic materials such as polymers, nanoparticles, organic compounds, and multidentate chelating ligands have been examined. Various synthetic routes and various functional groups have been employed for the functionalization of GO and GO/Fe3O4 nanoparticles.
The selection of the functional group is based on the scope of the application (i.e., extraction of a metal ion, extraction of a complex compound of a metal ion, etc.), since different functional groups result in different characteristics. The modification of GO (e.g., with organic functional groups, such as amino, carboxyl, and mercapto groups) aims to enhance the selectivity of the sorbent towards the target analyte, the sensitivity of the determination, and the overall performance of the extraction procedure. Functionalization methods for graphene oxide mainly include covalent functionalization, non-covalent functionalization, and elemental doping.
Covalent functionalization involves combining graphene oxide with functional groups by forming covalent bonds in order to improve processability and introduce new functions to the sorbent. Covalent functionalization can be mainly divided into carbon-skeleton functionalization, hydroxyl functionalization, and carboxyl functionalization. On the other hand, non-covalent functionalization is based on π–π bond interaction, hydrogen bond interaction, ion interaction, and electrostatic interaction. In this approach, the structure and excellent properties of graphene oxide are maintained, while its dispersibility and stability are improved. Finally, element doping modifications are performed to incorporate different elements into the sorbent and thus enhance the overall performance of the material [53][54].

3. Extraction of Metal Ions with Graphene-Oxide-Derived Materials

The applications of graphene-oxide-derived materials for the extraction of metal ions are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1. Application of graphene-oxide-derived materials for the extraction of metal ions.

Analyte

Sample Matrix

Sorbent

Functional Groups

Analytical Technique 1

LODs

(µg L−1)

Adsorption Time (min)/

Desorption Time (min)

Recovery

(%)

Adsorption

Capacity

(mg g−1)

Reusability

Ref.

Hg(II)

Seafood

GO/Fe3O4

Polythiophene

FI-CVAAS

0.03

21/2

85

1

 

[55]

Fish, rice, tea, milk

GO/Fe3O4

2-Pyridinecarboxaldehyde

ICP-OES

0.008

3/4

97

NA

 

[56]

Water

GO/Fe3O4

Chitosan, Mercaptopropyltrimethoxysilane

CVAAS

0.06

10/10

>95

>400

 

[57]

Cr(VI) & Cr(III) species

Water

GO/Fe3O4

 

FAAS

0.1

>5 min/3

97–103

60

At least 10 times

[58]

Water

GO/Fe3O4

Triethylenetetramine

FAAS

1.4–1.6

30/-

>96

9.6–16.4

 

[59]

Water

GO/Fe3O4

Imidazolium, thioamine

GFAAS

1.2 × 10−3

9/16.5

>95

304 (total)

 

[60]

Cr(VI)

Water

GO/Fe3O4

Polyaniline

GFAAS

5 × 10−3

20/4

68

14.8

 

[61]

Cd(II)

Water, rice

GO/Fe3O4

 

FAAS

0.21 × 10−3

2/1

>95

11.1

 

[62]

Au(II)

Water

GO/Fe3O4

 

FI-FAAS

4 × 10−3

Rapid/40 s

98–102

9.8

At least 10 times

[63]

Water

GO/Fe3O4

 

MP-AES

5 × 10−3

10/5

97–101

192.1

Up to 20 times

[64]

Co(II)

Water, food, biological samples

GO/Fe3O4

 

ETAAS

0.02

½

70–106

60

 

[65]

Zn(II)

Water, food

GO/Fe3O4

Polythionine

FAAS

0.08

7/-

>87

 

At least 5 times

[66]

Water, food

GO/Fe3O4

Chitosan, Zn-imprinted polymer

FAAS

0.09

10/5

>96

71.4

At least 9 times

[67]

Cu(II)

Eggplant, red lentil and mushroom

GO/Fe3O4

1,6-Hexadiamine

FAAS

0.9

10/2

>97

 

Up to 5 times

[68]

Pb(II)

Water, food

GO/Fe3O4

4-(2-pyridylazo)resorcinol

ETAAS

0.18 × 10−3

-/3

>98

133

 

[69]

Water, food

GO

Polystyrene

FAAS

2.5

Not applicable

>99

227.9

Up to 50 times

[70]

Tl(III)

Water

GO/Fe3O4

4-methyl-2(2-pyrazinyl)-1,3-thiazole-5-carboxy acid

GFAAS

12 × 10−3

8/3

65

20.0

 

[71]

Ce(III)

Water

RGO/Fe3O4

Thioglycolic-acid-capped Cadmium–tellurium quantum dots

ICP-OES

0.1

10/6

>96

56.8

At least 12 times

[72]

Sa(III)

Water

GO/Fe3O4

10-phenanthroline-2,9-dicarboxilic acid

ICP-OES

1.4

20/12

>97

   

[73]

1 FI-CVAAS: Flow-injection cold vapor atomic absorption spectrometry, ICP-OES: Inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry, CVAAS: Cold vapor atomic absorption spectrometry, FAAS: Flame atomic absorption spectroscopy, GFAAS: graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry, FI-FAAS: Flow-injection flame atomic absorption spectroscopy, MP-AES: Microwave plasma-atomic emission spectrometry, ETAAS: Electrothermal atomic absorption spectroscopy.

4. Multielement Extraction with Graphene-Oxide-Derived Materials

The applications of graphene-oxide-derived materials for multielement extraction are summarized in Table 2.
Table 2. Applications of graphene-oxide-derived materials for multielement extraction.

Analytes

Sample Matrix

Sorbent

Modification

Analytical Technique 1

LODs

(µg L−1)

Adsorption Time (min)/

Desorption Time (min)

Recovery

(%)

Adsorption Capacity

(mg g−1)

Reusability

Ref.

Co(II), Ni(II), Cu(II), Zn(II), Pb(II)

Water

GO

 

ICP-OES

0.5–1.8

5/-

94–106

294–1119

 

[74]

Cr(III), Co(II), Ni(II), Cu(II), Zn(II), Pb(II)

Water

GO

 

EDXRF

0.07–0.25

15/-

94–104

   

[75]

Cr(III), Cd(II), Pb(II)

Water, saliva, urine

GO

 

ETAAS

5-12 × 10−3

Few seconds/-

94–103

   

[76]

Co(II), Ni(II)

Water, black tea, tomato

GO

 

FAAS

0.18–0.25

Not applicable

>95

6.8–7

 

[77]

Cu(II), Pb(II)

Water

GO

SiO2

FAAS

0.08–0.27

Not applicable

>95

6.0–13.6

At least 50 times

[78]

Mn(II), Co(II), Ni(II), Cu(II), Cd(II), Pb(II)

Water

GO

Silica

ICP-MS

0.39–22 × 10−3

5/1

85–119

4.6–25

At least 50 times

[79]

Co(II), Ni(II), Cu(II), Cd(II), Pb(II)

Plasma, Urine

GO/Fe3O4

 

ICP-MS

0.02–0.40

7/7

81–113

1.3–9.7

At least 20 times

[80]

Cr(III), Pb(II)

Rice, milk, wine, water

GO/Fe3O4

Polyaniline–polypyrrole, SiO2

ICP-MS

3.4–4.8 × 10−3

6.3/3.7

96–103

188.9–213.3

At least 6 times

[81]

Cu(II), Pb(II), Zn(II), Cr(III), Cd(II)

Water, agricultural samples

GO/Fe3O4

Polypyrrole–polythiophene, SiO2

FAAS

0.15–0.65

6.5/12

90–106

80–230

At least 5 times

[82]

Pb(II), Cd(II), Cu(II), Ni(II), Co(II)

Water, food samples

GO/Fe3O4

Poly(vinylacetate-co-divinylbenzene)

FAAS

0.37–2.39

-/-

>95

   

[83]

Fe(III), Co(II), Ni(II), Cu(II), Zn(II),Pb(II)

Water

GO

Ethylene diamine

EDXRF

0.06–0.1

5/-

>90

   

[84]

Cd(II), Pb(II)

Water, vegetables

GO/Fe3O4

Diethylenetriamine (DETA)

FAAS

0.38–0.40

10/2

>99

59.9–172.4

 

[85]

Cr(III), Cu(II), Zn(II), Pb(II)

Water

GO/Fe3O4

Mercapto-groups

EDXRF

0.06–0.10

10/-

>95

191.5–487.3

 

[86]

Au(III), Pd(II), Ag(I)

Water, ore and automobile catalyst

Magnetic GO

2-mercaptobenzothiazole

ICP-OES

0.05–0.08

10/3

90–103

28–45

At least 5 times

[87]

Cd(II), Cu(II), Pb(II)

Water, vegetables

GO/Fe3O4

2-mercaptobenzothiazole

FAAS

0.19–0.35

4/5

>99

156–179

 

[88]

Co(II), Ni(II), Cu(II), As(III), Cd(II), Pb(II)

Water

GO

(3-mercaptopropyl)-trimethoxysilane

TXRF

0.05–9.11

10/2

>94

18.1–108.3

 

[89]

Pb(II), Cu(II)

Water

GO/Fe3O4

Trithiocyanuric acid

FAAS

0.13–0.32

Not applicable

>90

0.46–0.75

 

[90]

Mn(II), Fe(III)

Water, food and biological samples

GO

3-(1-methyl-1H-pyrrol-2-yl)-1H-pyrazole-5-carboxylic acid

FAAS

0.31–355

Not applicable

>95

21.6–24.0

 

[91]

Cr(III), Fe(III), Pb(II), Mn(II)

Wastewater

GO

Multi-walled carbon nanotubes -DETA

ICP-OES

0.16–0.50

Not applicable

>95

5.4–13.8

 

[92]

Cd(II), Pb(II)

Vegetables, fish, lipstick

GO/Fe3O4

8-Hydroxyquinoline

FAAS

0.09–0.27

5/5

>96

133–150

 

[93]

Cr(III), Zn(II), Cu(II)

Water

GO/Fe3O4

Glycine

EDXRF

0.07–0.15

10/-

>97

   

[94]

Noble metals, Sb(III), Hg(II)

Seawater

GO/Fe3O4

1,5-bis(di-2-pyridyl)methylene thiocarbohydrazide

ICP-OES

0.05–2.60

Not applicable

90–106

4.5–9.7

 

[95]

Cu (II), Pb(II), La(III), Ce(III), Eu(III), Dy(III), Yb(III)

Water

GO

TiO2

ICP-OES

0.13–2.64

Not applicable

>90

0.8–13.5

At least 90 times

[96]

REEs

Water

GO/Fe3O4

Polyaniline, SiO2

ICP-MS

0.04–1.49 × 10−3

2/5

80–121

7.7–16.3

At least 30 times

[97]

REEs

Nuts, water

Oxidized GO

 

ICP-MS

0.03–1.8

15/1

60–90

6.1–12.2

At least 12 times

[8]

1 ICP-OES: Inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry, EDXRF: Energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry, ETAAS: Electrothermal atomic absorption spectroscopy, FAAS: Flame atomic absorption spectroscopy, ICP-MS: Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, TXRF: Total-reflection X-ray fluorescence spectrometry.
Non-functionalized graphene oxide was employed for the dispersive solid-phase extraction of Co(II), Ni(II), Cu(II), Zn(II), and Pb(II) prior to their determination by energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (EDXRF) [74]. Good recovery, reproducibility, and extraction recovery were obtained. Graphene oxide has been also employed for the d-SPE of Cr(III), Co(II), Ni(II), Cu(II), Zn(II), and Pb(II) as their complexes with 2-(5-bromo-2-pyridylazo)-5-diethylaminophenol (5-Br-PADAP) using graphene oxide nanoparticles [75]. The chelation reagent does not form complexes with the alkali and alkaline earth metals, and it was therefore employed to enhance the selectivity of the extraction. In order to enhance the convenience of the d-SPE method, Ghazaghi et al. developed a coagulating homogenous extraction procedure based on coagulation of homogeneous GO solution with the aid of polyethyleneimine (PEI) [76]. In this work, PEI assisted the separation of the dispersed GO from the sample solution and provided satisfactory extraction recovery.
Solid-phase extraction of Co(II) and Ni(II) was performed by Pourjavid et al. using graphene oxide as adsorbent. In order to enhance the method’s selectivity, N-(5-methyl-2- hydroxyacetophenone)-N′-(2-hydroxyacetophenone) ethylene diamine (MHE) was used as a chelating agent and the complex of MHE and metal ions was extracted by graphene oxide in a SPE column [77].
Sitko et al. synthesized GO functionalized with spherical silica (GO@SiO2), coupling the amino groups of spherical aminosilica and the carboxyl groups of GO. The GO@SiO2 sorbent was packed into a SPE column and used for the extraction of Cu(II) and Pb(II) from water prior to their determination by FAAS [78]. Since small particles of GO can cause serious problems in SPE, such as high pressure in SPE system and the loss of adsorbent material, silica was covalently bonded with GO nanosheets to overcome these problems. Graphene-oxide–silica-composite-coated hollow fibers were synthesized and used for the online SPME of Mn(II), Co(II), Ni(II), Cu(II), Cd(II), and Pb(II) in environmental water samples prior to their determination by ICP-OES [79]. The novel fibers exhibited high adsorption capacity, reproducibility, and stability as well as long lifespan (more than 50 SPME cycles). Compared to the silica-coated hollow fiber, the GO–silica composite showed a different adsorption behavior, resulting in higher extraction efficiencies.
In order to combine the properties of GO with the ease in separation of magnetic nanoparticles, Sun et al. synthesized a magnetic graphene oxide nanocomposite with the one-step co-precipitation approach and used it for the MSPE of heavy metals from biological samples [80]. The GO/Fe3O4 sorbent was successfully employed for the extraction of Co(II), Ni(II), Cu(II), Cd(II), and Pb(II) from plasma and urine samples prior to their determination with ICP-MS.
Various polymers have been employed for the functionalization of GO, including polyaniline–polypyrrole (PANI-PPy) [81], polypyrrole–polythiophene (PPy-PTh) [82], and poly(vinylacetate-co-divinylbenzene) (DVB-VA) [83]. A polyaniline–polypyrrole-functionalized SiO2-coated magnetic graphene oxide composite was prepared and used for the MSPE of chromium and lead ions at trace levels in food and environmental water samples. Both polyaniline and polypyrrole contain amine and imine groups that can serve as good sorption sites for metals from complex matrices. Adsorption of metal ions to those polymers is based on hydrogen bonding π–π interactions, as well as ion-exchange interactions and chemical sorption. As a result, the adsorption capacity and the selectivity towards the target analytes was enhanced after functionalization [81].
In 2017, Molaei et al. synthesized a SiO2-coated magnetic GO modified with polypyrrole–polythiophene. For this purpose, magnetic GO was coated with SiO2 and the composite was modified by a copolymer with an in situ simultaneous oxidative polymerization of pyrrole and thiophene monomers, using iron chloride as an oxidant and dopant. The presence of N- and S-containing moieties enhanced the extraction efficiency of the nanocomposite and the selectivity of the MSPE procedure. The novel sorbent was successfully employed for the extraction of trace amounts of heavy metals (copper, lead, chromium, zinc, and cadmium) from water and agricultural samples prior to FAAS determination [82].
5. Application of Ionic Liquids and Deep Eutectic Solvents for the Modification of GO
Ionic liquids are an alternative to environmentally harmful ordinary organic solvents that are gaining more and more popularity lately [98]. These materials are generally composed of bulky, nonsymmetrical organic cations including imidazolium, pyrrolidinium, pyridinium, ammonium, or phosphonium and different inorganic or organic anions such as tetrafluoroborate or bromide anions [99]. In the field of analytical chemistry, ionic liquids have been used as ionic-liquid-supported membranes, as additives in mobile phases, as surface-bonded stationary phases, and as extraction solvents for sample preparation [99][100][101][102]. ILs have a tunable nature and their properties can be optimized through the choice of their cationic and anionic constituents. Among their extraordinary chemical and physical properties are negligible vapor pressure, excellent thermal stability, tunable viscosity, good miscibility with organic solvents and water, and their good extraction efficiency of metal ions and organic compounds [98][103]. The combination of ionic liquids and graphene-oxide-derived materials makes it possible to design and develop new extraction adsorbent phases with outstanding properties [98]. The applications of ILs as modifiers of GO-based materials for the extraction of metal ions are summarized in Table 3.
Table 3. Applications of ILs for the modification of GO-based materials for the extraction of metal ions.

Analyte

Sample Matrix

Sorbent

Ionic Liquids

Analytical Technique 1

LODs

(µgL−1)

Adsorption Time (min)/

Desorption Time (min)

Recovery (%)

Adsorption

Capacity

(mg g−1)

Ref.

Cd(II)

River and seawater, carrot,

lettuce and tobacco

GO/Fe3O4

1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium

tetrafluoroborate

FAAS

0.12

Few seconds/1 min

98–102

33.7

[104]

Pb(II), Cd(II), Ni(II), Cu(II) and Cr(III)

Medicine capsules

GO/Fe3O4 modified with

(3-mercaptopropyl)trimethoxysilane

1,4-diazabicyclo [2.2.2]octane

FAAS

0.2–1.8

4 min/1 min

95–102

18.1–47.6

[105]

Ni(II)

Sea and river water, tea,

spinach, cacao powder, cigarette

GO/Fe3O4

1-hexadecyl-3-methylimidazolium

chloride

FAAS

0.16

15 min/2 min

97–99

129.9

[106]

Al(III),

Cr(III), Cu(II), Pb(II)

Environmental water

Fe3O4-SiO2−GO

N-(3-

Dimethylaminopropyl)-N-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride

ICP-OES

0.5–30 × 10−3

5 min/3 min

89–118

5.0–11.7

[107]

Cu(II), Zn(II), Cd(II), Cr(III), Pb(II) and Co(II)

Environmental water

GO/Fe3O4

1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate

ICP-OES

0.1–1

10 min/6 min

34–94

312.5

[108]

1 FAAS: Flame atomic absorption spectroscopy, ICP-OES: Inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry.

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/molecules25102411

References

  1. Censi, P.; Spoto, S.E.; Saiano, F.; Sprovieri, M.; Mazzola, S.; Nardone, G.; Di Geronimo, S.I.; Punturo, R.; Ottonello, D. Heavy metals in coastal water systems. A case study from the northwestern Gulf of Thailand. Chemosphere 2016, 64, 1167–1176.
  2. Squadrone, S.; Prearo, M.; Brizio, P.; Gavinelli, S.; Pellegrino, M.; Scanzio, T.; Guarise, S.; Benetto, A.; Abete, M.C. Heavy metals distribution in muscle, liver, kidney and gill of European catfish (Silurus glanis) from Italian Rivers. Chemosphere 2013, 90, 358–365.
  3. Canli, M.; Atli, G. The relationships between heavy metal (Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, Pb, Zn) levels and the size of six Mediterranean fish species. Environ. Pollut. 2013, 121, 129–136.
  4. Zachariadis, G.; Anthemidis, A.N.; Bettas, P.G.; Stratis, J.A. Determination of lead by on-line solid phase extraction using a PTFE micro-column and flame atomic absorption spectrometry. Talanta 2002, 57, 919–927.
  5. Mousavi, H.Z.; Asghari, A.; Shirkhanloo, H. Determination of Hg in water and wastewater samples by CV-AAS following on-line preconcentration with silver trap. J. Anal. Chem. 2010, 65, 935–939.
  6. Daftsis, E.; Zachariadis, G. Analytical performance of ETAAS method for Cd, Co, Cr and Pb determination in blood fractions samples. Talanta 2007, 71, 722–730.
  7. Momen, A.; Zachariadis, G.; Anthemidis, A.; Stratis, J. Optimization and comparison of two digestion methods for multi-element analysis of certified reference plant materials by ICP-AES. Application of Plackett-Burman and central composite designs. Microchim. Acta 2007, 160, 397–403.
  8. Manousi, N.; Gomez-Gomez, B.; Madrid, Y.; Deliyanni, E.; Zachariadis, G. Determination of rare earth elements by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry after dispersive solid phase extraction with novel oxidized graphene oxide and optimization with response surface methodology and central composite design. Microchem. J. 2019, 152.
  9. Feist, B.; Mikula, B. Preconcentration of heavy metals on activated carbon and their determination in fruits by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry. Food Chem. 2014, 147, 302–306.
  10. Giakisikli, G.; Anthemidis, A. Magnetic materials as sorbents for metal/metalloid preconcentration and/or separation. A review. Anal. Chim. Acta 2013, 789, 1–16.
  11. Rosillo-Lopez, M.; Salzmann, C. Highly efficient heavy-metal extraction from water with carboxylated graphene nanoflakes. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 11043–11050.
  12. Mejias Carpio, I.; Mangadlao, J.; Nguyen, H.; Advincula, R.; Rodrigues, D. Graphene oxide functionalized with ethylenediamine triacetic acid for heavy metal adsorption and anti-microbial applications. Carbon 2014, 77, 289–301.
  13. Ensafi, A.; Rabiei, S.; Rezaei, B.; Allafchian, A. Magnetic solid-phase extraction to preconcentrate ultra trace amounts of lead(ii) using modified-carbon nanotubes decorated with NiFe2O4 magnetic nanoparticles. Anal. Methods 2013, 5, 3903–3908.
  14. Tadjarodi, A.; Abbaszadeh, A. A magnetic nanocomposite prepared from chelator-modified magnetite (Fe3O4) and HKUST-1 (MOF-199) for separation and preconcentration of mercury(II). Microchim. Acta. 2016, 183, 1391–1399.
  15. Liu, J.; Wang, X.; Zhao, C.; Hao, J.; Fang, G.; Wang, S. Fabrication of porous covalent organic frameworks as selective and advanced adsorbents for the on-line preconcentration of trace elements against the complex sample matrix. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 344, 220–229.
  16. Zou, Z.; Wang, S.; Jia, J.; Xu, F.; Long, Z.; Hou, X. Ultrasensitive determination of inorganic arsenic by hydride generation-atomic fluorescence spectrometry using Fe3O4@ZIF-8 nanoparticles for preconcentration. Microchem. J. 2016, 124, 578–583.
  17. Wu, Y.; Xu, G.; Wei, F.; Song, Q.; Tang, T.; Wang, X.; Hu, Q. Determination of Hg (II) in tea and mushroom samples based on metal-organic frameworks as solid-phase extraction sorbents. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2016, 235, 204–210.
  18. Kalantari, H.; Manoochehri, M. A nanocomposite consisting of MIL-101(Cr) and functionalized magnetite nanoparticles for extraction and determination of selenium(IV) and selenium(VI). Microchim. Acta 2018, 185.
  19. Rezaei Kahkha, M.; Daliran, S.; Oveisi, A.; Kaykhaii, M.; Sepehri, Z. The Mesoporous Porphyrinic Zirconium Metal-Organic Framework for Pipette-Tip Solid-Phase Extraction of Mercury from Fish Samples Followed by Cold Vapor Atomic Absorption Spectrometric Determination. Food Anal. Methods 2017, 10, 2175–2184.
  20. Abolghasemi, M.; Yousefi, V.; Piryaei, M. Synthesis of a metal-organic framework confined in periodic mesoporous silica with enhanced hydrostability as a novel fiber coating for solid-phase microextraction. J. Sep. Sci. 2015, 38, 1187–1193.
  21. Huang, X.; Qiu, N.; Yuan, D.; Huang, B. A novel stir bar sorptive extraction coating based on monolithic material for apolar, polar organic compounds and heavy metal ions. Talanta 2009, 78, 101–106.
  22. Novoselov, K.S.; Gheim, A.K.; Morozov, S.V.; Jiang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Dubonos, S.V.; Grigorieva, I.V.; Firsov, A.A. Electric Field Effect in Atomically Thin Carbon Films. Science 2004, 306, 666–669.
  23. Han, Q.; Wang, Z.; Xia, J.; Chen, S.; Zhang, X.; Ding, M. Facile and tunable fabrication of Fe3O4/graphene oxide nanocomposites and their application in the magnetic solid-phase extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from environmental water samples. Talanta 2012, 101, 388–395.
  24. Liu, Q.; Shi, J.; Jiang, G. Application of graphene in analytical sample preparation. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2012, 37, 1–11.
  25. Lin, L.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, X.; Li, J. Sensitive and Rapid Screening of T4 Polynucleotide Kinase Activity and Inhibition Based on Coupled Exonuclease Reaction and Graphene Oxide Platform. Anal. Chem. 2011, 83, 8396–8402.
  26. Tang, L.; Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Feng, H.; Lu, J.; Li, J. Preparation, Structure, and Electrochemical Properties of Reduced Graphene Sheet Films. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2009, 19, 2782–2789.
  27. Wang, X.; Bai, H.; Yao, Z.; Liu, A.; Shi, G. Electrically conductive and mechanically strong biomimetic chitosan/reduced graphene oxide composite films. J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 9032–9036.
  28. Yu, I.; Xiong, X.; Tsang, D.; Ng, Y.; Clark, J.; Fan, J.; Zhang, S.; Hu, C.; Ok, Y. Graphite oxide- and graphene oxide-supported catalysts for microwave-assisted glucose isomerisation in water. Green Chem. 2019, 21, 4341–4353.
  29. Gadipelli, S.; Guo, Z. Graphene-based materials: Synthesis and gas sorption, storage and separation. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2015, 69, 1–60.
  30. Sun, X.; Liu, Z.; Welsher, K.; Robinson, J.; Goodwin, A.; Zaric, S.; Dai, H. Nano-graphene oxide for cellular imaging and drug delivery. Nano. Res. 2008, 1, 203–212.
  31. Sitko, R.; Zawisza, B.; Malicka, E. Graphene as a new sorbent in analytical chemistry. Trac. Trends Anal. Chem. 2013, 51, 33–43.
  32. Hummers, W.; Offeman, R. Preparation of Graphitic Oxide. J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80, 1339.
  33. Dai, B.; Shao, X.P.; Ma, Y.J.; Pei, Z.H. Review of new carbon materials—Graphene. Mater. Rev. 2010, 24, 17–21.
  34. Stankovich, S.; Dikin, D.A.; Dommett, G.H.B.; Kohlhaas, K.M.; Zimney, E.J.; Stach, E.A.; Piner, R.D.; Nguyen, S.T.; Ruoff, R.S. Graphene-Based Composite Materials. Nature 2006, 442, 282–286.
  35. Maggira, M.; Deliyanni, E.; Samanidou, V. Synthesis of Graphene Oxide Based Sponges and Their Study as Sorbents for Sample Preparation of Cow Milk Prior to HPLC Determination of Sulfonamides. Molecules 2019, 24.
  36. Manousi, N.; Giannakoudakis, D.; Rosenberg, E.; Zachariadis, G. Extraction of Metal Ions with Metal–Organic Frameworks. Molecules 2019, 24.
  37. Li, N.; Chen, J.; Shi, Y. Magnetic reduced graphene oxide functionalized with β-cyclodextrin as magnetic solid-phase extraction adsorbents for the determination of phytohormones in tomatoes coupled with high performance liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2016, 1441, 24–33.
  38. Zhang, Y.; Zhou, H.; Zhang, Z.; Wu, X.; Chen, W.; Zhu, Y.; Fang, C.; Zhao, Y. Three-dimensional ionic liquid functionalized magnetic graphene oxide nanocomposite for the magnetic dispersive solid phase extraction of 16 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in vegetable oils. J. Chromatogr. A 2017, 1489, 29–38.
  39. Amiri, A.; Baghayeri, M.; Sedighi, M. Magnetic solid-phase extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons using a graphene oxide/Fe3O4@polystyrene nanocomposite. Microchim. Acta 2018, 185.
  40. Kyzas, C.Z.; Deliyanni, E.A.; Bikiaris, D.N.; Mitropoulos, A.C. Graphene composites as dye adsorbents: Review. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2018, 129, 75–88.
  41. Travlou, N.A.; Kyzas, C.Z.; Lazaridis, N.K.; Deliyanni, E.A. Functionalization of graphite oxide with magnetic chitosan for the preparation of a nanocomposite dye adsorbent. Langmuir 2013, 29, 1657–1668.
  42. Kyzas, G.Z.; Travlou, N.A.; Kalogirou, O.; Deliyanni, E. Magnetic graphene oxide: Effect of preparation route on Reactive Black 5 adsorption. Materials 2013, 6, 1360–1376.
  43. Kyzas, G.Z.; Deliyanni, E.; Matis, K.A. Graphene oxide and its application as adsorbent to waste water treatment. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol 2014, 89, 196–205.
  44. Rekos, K.; Kampouraki, Z.C.; Sarafidis, C.; Samanidou, V.; Deliyanni, E. Graphene Oxide Based Magnetic Nanocomposites with Polymers as Effective Bisphenol–A Nanoadsorbents. Materials 2019, 12.
  45. Zhu, Y.; Murali, S.; Cai, W.; Li, X.; Suk, J.; Potts, J.; Ruoff, R. Graphene and Graphene Oxide: Synthesis, Properties, and Applications. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 3906–3924.
  46. Zhang, X.; Zhang, J.; Li, W.; Yang, Y.; Qin, P.; Zhang, X.; Lu, M. Magnetic graphene oxide nanocomposites as the adsorbent for extraction and pre-concentration of azo dyes in different food samples followed by high-performance liquid chromatography analysis. Food Addit. Contam. A 2018, 35, 2099–2110.
  47. Costa dos Reis, L.; Vidal, L.; Canals, A. Graphene oxide/Fe3O4 as sorbent for magnetic solid-phase extraction coupled with liquid chromatography to determine 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene in water samples. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2017, 409, 2665–2674.
  48. Wu, L.; Yu, L.; Ding, X.; Li, P.; Dai, X.; Chen, X.; Zhou, H.; Bai, Y.; Ding, J. Magnetic solid-phase extraction based on graphene oxide for the determination of lignans in sesame oil. Food Chem. 2017, 217, 320–325.
  49. Smith, A.T.; LaChance, A.M.; Zeng, S.; Liu, B.; Sun, L. Synthesis, properties, and applications of graphene oxide/reduced graphene oxide and their nanocomposites. Nano Mater. Sci. 2019, 1, 31–47.
  50. Singh, R.; Kumar, R.; Singh, D. Graphene oxide: Strategies for synthesis, reduction and frontier applications. RSC. Adv. 2016, 6, 64993–65011.
  51. Bele, S.; Samanidou, V.; Deliyanni, E. Effect of the reduction degree of graphene oxide on the adsorption of Bisphenol A. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2016, 109, 573–585.
  52. Qi, T.; Huang, C.; Yan, S.; Li, X.; Pan, S. Synthesis, characterization and adsorption properties of magnetite/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites. Talanta 2015, 144, 1116–1124.
  53. Sherlala, A.; Raman, A.; Bello, M.; Asghar, A. A review of the applications of organo-functionalized magnetic graphene oxide nanocomposites for heavy metal adsorption. Chemosphere 2018, 193, 1004–1017.
  54. Yu, W.; Sisi, L.; Haiyan, Y.; Jie, L. Progress in the functional modification of graphene/graphene oxide: A review. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 15328–15345.
  55. Seidi, S.; Fotouhi, M. Magnetic dispersive solid phase extraction based on polythiophene modified magnetic graphene oxide for mercury determination in seafood followed by flow-injection cold vapor atomic absorption spectrometry. Anal. Methods 2017, 9, 803–813.
  56. Keramat, A.; Zare-Dorabei, R. Ultrasound-assisted dispersive magnetic solid phase extraction for preconcentration and determination of trace amount of Hg (II) ions from food samples and aqueous solution by magnetic graphene oxide (Fe3O4@GO/2-PTSC): Central composite design optimization. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2017, 38, 421–429.
  57. Ziaei, E.; Mehdinia, A.; Jabbari, A. A novel hierarchical nanobiocomposite of graphene oxide–magnetic chitosan grafted with mercapto as a solid phase extraction sorbent for the determination of mercury ions in environmental water samples. Anal. Chim. Acta 2014, 850, 49–56.
  58. Kazemi, E.; Haji Shabani, A.; Dadfarnia, S.; Izadi, F. Speciation and determination of chromium ions by dispersive micro solid phase extraction using magnetic graphene oxide followed by flame atomic absorption spectrometry. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2017, 97, 1080–1093.
  59. Islam, A.; Ahmad, H.; Zaidi, N.; Kumar, S. A graphene oxide decorated with triethylenetetramine-modified magnetite for separation of chromium species prior to their sequential speciation and determination via FAAS. Microchim. Acta 2015, 183, 289–296.
  60. Sarikhani, Z.; Manoochehri, M. Determination of Ultra Trace Cr(III) and Cr(VI) Species by Electrothermal Atomic Absorption Spectrometry after Simultaneous Magnetic Solid Phase Extraction with the Aid of a Novel Imidazolium-Functionalized Magnetite Graphene Oxide Nanocomposite. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2017, 90, 746–753.
  61. Seidi, S.; Majd, M. Polyaniline-functionalized magnetic graphene oxide for dispersive solid-phase extraction of Cr(VI) from environmental waters followed by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry. J. Iran. Chem. Soc. 2017, 14, 1195–1206.
  62. Etezadi, H.; Baramakeh, L. Application of Graphene Oxide- Magnetic Nanoparticle for Solid Phase Extraction of Trace Amounts of Cadmium Ions in Environmental Samples. J. Phys. Chem. Electrochem. 2014, 2, 137–147.
  63. Kazemi, E.; Dadfarnia, S.; Haji Shabani, A. Dispersive solid phase microextraction with magnetic graphene oxide as the sorbent for separation and preconcentration of ultra-trace amounts of gold ions. Talanta 2015, 141, 273–278.
  64. Ahmad, H.; Jalil, A.; Triwahyono, S. Dispersive solid phase extraction of gold with magnetite-graphene oxide prior to its determination via microwave plasma-atomic emission spectrometry. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 88110–88116.
  65. AlKinani, A.; Eftekhari, M.; Gheibi, M. Ligandless dispersive solid phase extraction of cobalt ion using magnetic graphene oxide as an adsorbent followed by its determination with electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2019, 1–18.
  66. Babaei, A.; Zeeb, M.; Es-haghi, A. Magnetic dispersive solid-phase extraction based on graphene oxide/Fe3O4@polythionine nanocomposite followed by atomic absorption spectrometry for zinc monitoring in water, flour, celery and egg. J. Sci. Food Agr. 2018, 98, 3571–3579.
  67. Kazemi, E.; Dadfarnia, S.; Haji Shabani, A.; Ranjbar, M. Synthesis, characterization, and application of a Zn (II)-imprinted polymer grafted on graphene oxide/magnetic chitosan nanocomposite for selective extraction of zinc ions from different food samples. Food Chem. 2017, 237, 921–928.
  68. Bahar, S.; Karami, F. Amino-functionalized Fe3O4–graphene oxide nanocomposite as magnetic solid-phase extraction adsorbent combined with flame atomic absorption spectrometry for copper analysis in food samples. J. Iran. Chem. Soc. 2015, 12, 2213–2220.
  69. Akbarzade, S.; Chamsaz, M.; Rounaghi, G. Highly selective preconcentration of ultra-trace amounts of lead ions in real water and food samples by dispersive solid phase extraction using modified magnetic graphene oxide as a novel sorbent. Anal. Methods 2018, 10, 2081–2087.
  70. Islam, A.; Ahmad, H.; Zaidi, N.; Kumar, S. Graphene Oxide Sheets Immobilized Polystyrene for Column Preconcentration and Sensitive Determination of Lead by Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 13257–13265.
  71. Nazari, S.; Mehri, A.; Hassannia, A. Fe3O4-modified graphene oxide as a sorbent for sequential magnetic solid phase extraction and dispersive liquid phase microextraction of thallium. Microchim. Acta 2017, 184, 3239–3246.
  72. Farzin, L.; Shamsipur, M.; Shanehsaz, M.; Sheibani, S. A new approach to extraction and preconcentration of Ce(III) from aqueous solutions using magnetic reduced graphene oxide decorated with thioglycolic-acid-capped CdTe QDs. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2017, 97, 854–867.
  73. Farzin, L.; Amiri, M. Determination of samarium (III) ions in environmental samples after magnetic solid phase extraction using 1, 10- phenanthroline-2, 9-dicarboxilic acid modified Fe3O4/GO nanosheets. J. Nanoanal. 2018, 5, 241–248.
  74. Zawisza, B.; Sitko, R.; Malicka, E.; Talik, E. Graphene oxide as a solid sorbent for the preconcentration of cobalt, nickel, copper, zinc and lead prior to determination by energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry. Anal. Methods 2013, 5, 6425–6430.
  75. Pytlakowska, K. Dispersive micro solid-phase extraction of heavy metals as their complexes with 2-(5-bromo-2-pyridylazo) -5-diethylaminophenol using graphene oxide nanoparticles. Microchim. Acta 2016, 183, 91–99.
  76. Ghazaghi, M.; Mousavi, H.; Rashidi, A.; Shirkhanloo, H.; Rahighi, R. Innovative separation and preconcentration technique of coagulating homogenous dispersive micro solid phase extraction exploiting graphene oxide nanosheets. Anal. Chim. Acta 2016, 902, 33–42.
  77. Pourjavid, M.; Arabieh, M.; Yousefi, S.; Jamali, M.; Rezaee, M.; Hosseini, M.; Sehat, A. Study on column SPE with synthesized graphene oxide and FAAS for determination of trace amount of Co(II) and Ni(II) ions in real samples. Mat. Sci. Eng. C 2015, 47, 114–122.
  78. Sitko, R.; Zawisza, B.; Talik, E.; Janik, P.; Osoba, G.; Feist, B.; Malicka, E. Spherical silica particles decorated with graphene oxide nanosheets as a new sorbent in inorganic trace analysis. Anal. Chim. Acta 2014, 834, 22–29.
  79. Su, S.; Chen, B.; He, M.; Hu, B. Graphene oxide–silica composite coating hollow fiber solid phase microextraction online coupled with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry for the determination of trace heavy metals in environmental water samples. Talanta 2014, 123, 1–9.
  80. Sun, J.; Liang, Q.; Han, Q.; Zhang, X.; Ding, M. One-step synthesis of magnetic graphene oxide nanocomposite and its application in magnetic solid phase extraction of heavy metal ions from biological samples. Talanta 2015, 132, 557–563.
  81. Suo, L.; Zhao, J.; Dong, X.; Gao, X.; Li, X.; Xu, J.; Lu, X.; Zhao, L. Functionalization of a SiO2-coated magnetic graphene oxide composite with polyaniline–polypyrrole for magnetic solid phase extraction of ultra-trace Cr(III) and Pb(II) in water and food samples using a Box–Behnken design. New J. Chem. 2019, 43, 12126–12136.
  82. Molaei, K.; Bagheri, H.; Asgharinezhad, A.; Ebrahimzadeh, H.; Shamsipur, M. SiO2-coated magnetic graphene oxide modified with polypyrrole–polythiophene: A novel and efficient nanocomposite for solid phase extraction of trace amounts of heavy metals. Talanta 2017, 167, 607–616.
  83. Khan, M.; Yilmaz, E.; Sevinc, B.; Sahmetlioglu, E.; Shah, J.; Jan, M.; Soylak, M. Preparation and characterization of magnetic allylamine modified graphene oxide-poly(vinyl acetate-co-divinylbenzene) nanocomposite for vortex assisted magnetic solid phase extraction of some metal ions. Talanta 2016, 146, 130–137.
  84. Zawisza, B.; Baranik, A.; Malicka, E.; Talik, E.; Sitko, R. Preconcentration of Fe(III), Co(II), Ni(II), Cu(II), Zn(II) and Pb(II) with ethylenediamine-modified graphene oxide. Microchim. Acta 2015, 183, 231–240.
  85. Aliyari, E.; Alvand, M.; Shemirani, F. Simultaneous separation and preconcentration of lead and cadmium from water and vegetable samples using a diethylenetriamine-modified magnetic graphene oxide nanocomposite. Anal. Methods 2015, 7, 7582–7589.
  86. Pytlakowska, K.; Pilch, M.; Hachuła, B.; Nycz, J.; Kornaus, K.; Pisarski, W. Energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometric determination of copper, zinc, lead and chromium species after preconcentration on graphene oxide chemically modified with mercapto-groups. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2019, 34, 1416–1425.
  87. Neyestani, M.; Shemirani, F.; Mozaffari, S.; Alvand, M. A magnetized graphene oxide modified with 2-mercaptobenzothiazole as a selective nanosorbent for magnetic solid phase extraction of gold(III), palladium(II) and silver(I). Microchim. Acta 2017, 184, 2871–2879.
  88. Dahaghin, Z.; Mousavi, H.; Sajjadi, S. Trace amounts of Cd(II), Cu(II) and Pb(II) ions monitoring using Fe3O4@graphene oxide nanocomposite modified via 2-mercaptobenzothiazole as a novel and efficient nanosorbent. J. Mol. Liq. 2017, 231, 386–395.
  89. Sitko, R.; Janik, P.; Zawisza, B.; Talik, E.; Margui, E.; Queralt, I. Green Approach for Ultratrace Determination of Divalent Metal Ions and Arsenic Species Using Total-Reflection X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometry and Mercapto-Modified Graphene Oxide Nanosheets as a Novel Adsorbent. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 3535–3542.
  90. Mosavi, S.; Ghanemi, K.; Nickpour, Y. Graphene oxide nanosheets modified with trithiocyanuric acid for extraction and enrichment of Pb (II) and Cu (II) ions in seawater. Water Environ. J. 2018, 32, 377–383.
  91. Pourjavid, M.; Sehat, A.; Arabieh, M.; Yousefi, S.; Hosseini, M.; Rezaee, M. Column solid phase extraction and flame atomic absorption spectrometric determination of manganese(II) and iron(III) ions in water, food and biological samples using 3-(1-methyl-1H-pyrrol-2-yl)-1H-pyrazole-5-carboxylic acid on synthesized graphene oxide. Mat. Sci. Eng. 2014, 35, 370–378.
  92. Zhu, X.; Cui, Y.; Chang, X.; Wang, H. Selective solid-phase extraction and analysis of trace-level Cr(III), Fe(III), Pb(II), and Mn(II) Ions in waste water using diethylenetriamine-functionalized carbon nanotubes dispersed in graphene oxide colloids. Talanta 2016, 146, 358–363.
  93. Dahaghin, R.; Mousavi, H.Z.; Sajjadi, M. Synthesis and Application of Magnetic Graphene Oxide Modified with 8--Hydroxyquinoline for Extraction and Preconcentration of Trace Heavy Metal Ions. Chem. Select. 2017, 2, 1282–1289.
  94. Pytlakowska, K.; Kozik, V.; Matussek, M.; Pilch, M.; Hachuła, B.; Kocot, K. Glycine modified graphene oxide as a novel sorbent for preconcentration of chromium, copper, and zinc ions from water samples prior to energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometric determination. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 42836–42844.
  95. Garcia-Mesa, J.C.; Leal, P.M.; Guerrero, M.M.L.; Alonso, E.I.V. Simultaneous determination of noble metals, Sb and Hg by magnetic solid phase extraction on line ICP OES based on a new functionalized magnetic graphene oxide. Microchem. J. 2019, 150.
  96. Zhang, Y.; Zhong, C.; Zhang, Q.; Chen, B.; He, M.; Hu, B. Graphene oxide–TiO2 composite as a novel adsorbent for the preconcentration of heavy metals and rare earth elements in environmental samples followed by on-line inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry detection. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 5996–6005.
  97. Su, S.; Chen, B.; He, M.; Hu, B.; Xiao, Z. Determination of trace/ultratrace rare earth elements in environmental samples by ICP-MS after magnetic solid phase extraction with Fe3O4@SiO2@polyaniline–graphene oxide composite. Talanta 2014, 119, 458–466.
  98. Chatzimitakos, T.; Stalikas, C. Carbon-Based Nanomaterials Functionalized with Ionic Liquids for Microextraction in Sample Preparation. Separations 2017, 4.
  99. Han, D.; Row, K.H. Recent applications of ionic liquids in separation technology. Molecules 2010, 15, 2405–2426.
  100. Serrano, M.; Chatzimitakos, T.; Gallego, M.; Stalikas, C.D. 1-butyl-3-aminopropyl imidazolium functionalized graphene oxide as a nanoadsorbent for the simultaneous extraction of steroids and β-blockers via dispersive solid-phase microextraction. J. Chromatogr. A 2016, 1436, 9–18.
  101. García-Alvarez-Coque, M.; Ruiz-Angel, M.; Berthod, A.; Carda-Broch, S. On the use of ionic liquids as mobile phase additives in high-performance liquid chromatography. A review. Anal. Chim. Acta 2015, 883, 1–21.
  102. Shi, X.; Qiao, L.; Xu, G. Recent development of ionic liquid stationary phases for liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2015, 1420, 1–15.
  103. Wasserscheid, P.; Welton, T. Ionic Liquids in Synthesis, 2nd ed.; Wiley-VCH: Berlin, Germany, 2003.
  104. Alvand, M.; Shemirani, F. Fabrication of Fe3O4@graphene oxide core-shell nanospheres for ferrofluid-based dispersive solid phase extraction as exemplified for Cd(II) as a model analyte. Microchim. Acta 2016, 183, 1749–1757.
  105. Lotfi, Z.; Mousavi, H.Z.; Sajjadi, S.M. Covalently bonded double-charged ionic liquid on magnetic graphene oxide as a novel, efficient, magnetically separable and reusable sorbent for extraction of heavy metals from medicine capsules. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 90360–90370.
  106. Aliyari, E.; Alvand, M.; Shemirani, F. Modified surface-active ionic liquid-coated magnetic graphene oxide as a new magnetic solid phase extraction sorbent for preconcentration of trace nickel. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 64193–64202.
  107. Gu, W.; Zhu, X. Nanoparticles of type Fe3O4-SiO2-graphene oxide and coated with an amino acid-derived ionic liquid for extraction of Al(III), Cr(III), Cu(II), Pb(II) prior to their determination by ICP-OES. Microchim. Acta 2017, 184, 4279–4286.
  108. Rofouei, M.; Jamshidi, S.; Seidi, S.; Saleh, A. A bucky gel consisting of Fe3O4 nanoparticles, graphene oxide and ionic liquid as an efficient sorbent for extraction of heavy metal ions from water prior to their determination by ICP-OES. Microchim. Acta 2017, 184, 3425–3432.
More
This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!
ScholarVision Creations