Novel biomarkers of heart failure are the subject of numerous studies. Biomarkers of heart failure can be determined in the blood and in the urine. The future of biomarker use is in multimarker panels that include a combination of biomarkers with different pathophysiological mechanisms in order to improve their diagnostic and prognostic predictive value.
1. Introduction
Despite advances in medicine, heart failure is still an important cause of morbidity and mortality in the modern world. Consequently, there is a considerable need to find new ways of predicting, screening, and prognosticating heart failure, especially in pediatrics [
1]. Laboratory diagnostics is an important part of the decision-making process in everyday clinical practice in order to come to a diagnosis, and additionally for risk stratification and therapeutical choices [
2].
Various novel biomarkers of heart failure have been studied in adults. However, reliable novel biomarkers of heart failure in pediatrics have not been sufficiently studied for everyday clinical practice yet, therefore, additional knowledge is very welcome. In this review, we try to classify biomarkers according to the pathophysiological mechanisms that contribute to the development of heart failure. Several biomarkers of heart failure are still under evaluation and a detailed review of all of them is beyond the scope of this narrative review.
In pediatrics, biomarkers of heart failure are particularly important for the early identification and risk stratification of patients with systemic diseases and associated risk for early development of heart failure. Good biomarkers have the following characteristics: high sensitivity and specificity, the possibility of simultaneous processing of many samples, short analysis time, low cost, and good clinical applications, thus predicting the risk of heart failure and the associated prognosis as well as the adequacy of monitoring [
3].
Two strategies are currently in place to detect newer biomarkers of heart failure, the first is based on proteomics and metabolomics, which means comparing blood and tissue samples from patients with heart failure with healthy individuals. It provides data on the expression of proteins and their breakdown products [
4]. This first approach does not provide a lot of information about the pathophysiological processes that lead to the disease, which is typical for the second approach, based on the mechanisms underlying the development of cardiovascular disease [
5]. Biomarkers of heart failure can be determined in blood samples and some also in urine samples. In this review, we will present seven groups of newer biomarkers that are associated with heart failure based on pathophysiological mechanisms, as seen in
Table 1. Normal values of some biomarkers of heart failure are presented in
Table 2 [
6,
7,
8,
9]. In addition, we will also highlight the possibilities of determining biomarkers in the urine, which allows less invasive sampling and better participation of patients and healthy individuals in potential clinical studies.
Table 1. Biomarkers of heart failure based on pathophysiological mechanisms.
Myocardial Stretch |
Myocyte Injury |
Myocardial Remodeling |
Inflammation |
Renal Dysfunction |
Neurohumoral Activation |
Oxidative Stress |
BNP 1 |
CTn 5 (TnI 6, TnT 7) |
galectin-3 |
GDF-15 12 |
NGAL 19 |
MR-proADM 24 |
ceruloplasmin |
NT-proBNP 2 |
hs-cTn 8 |
sST2 11 |
EMPs 13 |
KIM-1 20 |
copeptin |
MPO 26 |
ANP 3 |
H-FABPs 9 |
microRNAs |
EPCs 14 |
cystatin C |
MMPs 25 |
SUA 27 |
MR-proANP 4 |
GSTP1 10 |
|
CRP 15 |
IL-18 21 |
|
vitamin D3 |
|
|
|
hs-CRP 16 |
L-FABP 22 |
|
8-hydroxy-2-0-deoxyguanosine |
|
|
|
TNF-α 17 |
NAG 23 |
|
|
|
|
|
IL-6 18 |
β-2 microglobulin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
glutathione-S-transferase |
|
|
This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/children9050740