Fabrication of Nanoporous Anodic Alumina (NAA): History
View Latest Version
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Contributor:
Chang-Hwan Choi
,
Khoobaram Choudhari
,
Santhosh Chidangil
,
Sajan Daniel George

The fabrication of a thick oxide layer onto an aluminum surface via anodization has been a subject of intense research activity for more than a century, largely due to protective and decorative applications. The capability to create well-defined pores via a cost-effective electrochemical oxidation technique onto the surface has made a major renaissance in the field, as the porous surfaces exhibit remarkably different properties compared to a bulk oxide layer. Amongst the various nanoporous structures being investigated, nanoporous anodic alumina (NAA) with well-organized and highly ordered hexagonal honeycomb-like pores has emerged as the most popular nanomaterial due to its wide range of applications, ranging from corrosion resistance to bacterial repelling surfaces.

  • nanoporous anodic alumina
  • nanomaterials

1. Types of Anodic Alumina Films

Figure 1 shows a typical anodization setup used for the fabrication of NAA. The electrochemical cell used for anodization consists of an outer jacket used for coolant circulation to ensure a low-temperature environment for electrolytes on the inner side. The electrodes are connected with high purity aluminum foil of the desired size as an anode and a suitable cathode metal. The power supply maintains the required condition of galvanostatic or potentiostatic anodization.
Nanomaterials 12 00444 g001 550
Figure 1. Typical experimental setup for the fabrication of NAA.
Electrochemical anodization of aluminum in aqueous electrolytes leads to two different morphologies: (i) non-porous barrier-type oxide films and (ii) nanoporous oxide films. The nature of the electrolyte determines the resulting oxide’s porosity. If the electrolyte is of neutral pH in which the oxide is insoluble, for example, borates, citrates, tartrates, and phosphates, and so on, the oxide grown will be of a non-porous type [1]. During the barrier layer formation under the influence of constant potential, current density (j) decreases exponentially with time, restraining the thickness of the oxide layer. Their thickness is limited to several hundreds of nanometers by the initiation of dielectric breakdown [2] and is directly proportional to the applied voltage. On the other hand, nanoporous oxides are formed in the acidic electrolytes, which promote oxide dissolution, such as sulfuric [3][4][5], oxalic [5][6], phosphoric [5][7], selenic [8][9], malonic [10], malic [11], phosphonic [12], citric [13][14], tartaric [15][16], etidronic [17][18], glutaric [19], and phosphonoacetic acid [20]. During the porous alumina formation, the current density stays almost constant under the potentiostatic condition because of the constant thickness of the barrier layer at the base of the pores. Here, the thickness of the oxide layer can be increased to hundreds of micrometers, and the thickness is proportional to the amount of charge in the reaction. Diggle et al. [21] and others [22] have reviewed the topic of non-porous barrier-type alumina in detail. However, researchers concentrate on the fabrication, structural features, and optical properties of nanoporous anodic alumina.
Early porous anodization was carried out mainly by the surface finishing industry for the interest of cost-effective processes and improvisation in the engineering of the final anodized product. Although these industries have ample knowledge base on the various anodization processes, there was no need to precisely regulate the self-organization, pore-ordering, or pore-size distribution in such applications. Hard anodization (high-field anodization) is one such example where the industry resorts to NAA fabrication, where anodization is typically carried out at potentials higher than the breakdown values to obtain thick anodic oxide films in a short time. The dielectric breakdown of aluminum happens at a potential of at least 245 V where visible sparking, cracking, or burning of the oxide film commences along with the localized heating [23]. At such high voltages, due to high current density, the growth rates were as high as 50–100 μm h−1 [24][25]. However, the obtained aluminum oxides were having uneven surfaces with disordered structures, no uniformity in pores, and possessed several micrometer-sized cracks. Moreover, the control of pore properties such as pore diameters, interpore distance, and aspect ratio is also not easy. Thus, the industrial hard anodization techniques were not adopted as such in nanotechnology or academic research where mild anodization has found its place comfortably.
In mild anodization conditions (low-field anodization), much lower voltages are used to obtain highly ordered nanopore arrays. NAA has been prepared in mild anodization using the three most popular electrolytes, namely, sulfuric, oxalic, and phosphoric acids. The main disadvantage of mild anodization is its tiresomely low throughput with the sluggish speed in the growth of an oxide layer (no faster than 2 μm h−1). Recent development in new hard anodization techniques enabled higher throughput and their application in new processes. An improved hard anodization was introduced wherein a higher anodization speed of up to 100 μm h−1 could be achieved [24][26]. The hard anodization has been implemented in all three common electrolytes, providing more options for controlling the pore properties. Despite the advantage of a higher growth rate in hard anodization compared to conventional mild anodization, the former has several drawbacks and technical limitations such as the frequent and higher probability of a dielectric breakdown and the need of a high cooling facility to take care of the enormous heat generated during anodization [27]. To overcome the limitations of hard anodization, various improvisations have been attempted. In one such attempt, additives like ethanol [28], oxalate [29], and aluminum sulfate [30] were added, which stabilized the hard anodization by improving the dissipation of large quantities of heat generated due to high current densities (>200 mA cm−2) [27]. Another approach was to add ethylene glycol, which increased the electrical resistivity of the electrolyte, resulting in the increase of limiting breakdown potential [31]. The most popular approach is to perform mild anodization in first stage, which will avoid burning or breakdown, followed by the hard anodization in gradually increasing voltage conditions in the second stage [32]. Thus, hard anodization in combination with mild anodization, either in sequential or in pulsed processes opens up new fabrication strategies to obtain tailor-designed nanomaterials involving complex nanostructures [27].

2. Structure of NAA

The well-known growth conditions in mild anodization are as follows: for sulfuric acid at a voltage of 25 V resulting in the interpore distance (Di) of 63 nm, for oxalic acid at 40 V giving Di = 100 nm, and for phosphoric acid at 195 V yielding Di = 500 nm [26][33][34][35][36]. Although several other electrolytes such as citric, chromic, boric, and tartaric acids have been used for anodization, the NAA obtained displayed inferior pore ordering than the ones prepared in the three common electrolytes. A schematic representation of the ideal structure of NAA is shown in Figure 2. Ideal NAA has a highly ordered pore arrangement with a honeycomb-like structure. It has non-intersecting pores, which are parallel to each other and perfectly perpendicular to the substrate. Each hexagonal cell consists of a cylindrical nanopore ending at the metal/oxide interface, where a barrier layer is present. The barrier oxide layer has concave hemispherical morphology.
Nanomaterials 12 00444 g002 550
Figure 2. Schematic representation of (a) nanoporous anodic alumina (NAA); and (b) cross-sectional view; Lp—pore length (or thickness of the porous layer), Dp—pore diameter, Di—interpore distance, tb—the thickness of the barrier layer, and tw—the pore wall thickness.
The perfect hexagonal and close-packed nanopore arrangement is obtained only under certain conditions for a given electrolyte. Several structural parameters are used to define the structure of the self-ordered NAA. These include pore diameter—Dp, interpore distance—Di, length of nanopores—Lp (also called the thickness of NAA), pore density—np (i.e., number of pores per unit area), porosity—P (the fraction of the area covered by pores on a given substrate), barrier layer thickness—tb, and pore-wall thickness—tw. Following simple geometrical considerations, the following relationships can be expressed for a perfectly ordered NAA [24][37]:
D i = D p + 2   t w ,
P = π 2 3 [ D p D i ] 2 ,
n p = 2 × 10 14 3   D i 2   per   cm − 2 .
The structural parameters of NAA are dependent on the anodization process parameters such as the type and pH of electrolyte, applied anodization potential, current density, and temperature.

2.1. Pore Diameter

In general, for ideal NAA structures, the pore diameter Dp is linearly proportional to the applied anodization potential (U) with a proportionality constant k [38][39].
D p = k · U ,
where the k value is approximately 1.29 nmV−1 for NAA formed in phosphoric acid at various constant voltages in the range 80–120 V. However, the dependence of Dp on U is sensitive to the concentration of the electrolyte as well. It has been revealed that Dp increases linearly with the increasing concentration of the electrolyte and the applied voltage [40]. The effect of change in the concentration is more pronounced at a higher voltage. Moreover, the correlation of Dp with the temperature is positive. The change in Dp with temperature has been the subject of many studies. Anodization potential and temperature have been found to affect the pore properties, including Dp and pore-regularity. Sulka and Parkola have shown that for NAA prepared in sulfuric acid, the defect-free and best hexagonal pore arrangement can be obtained only at 25 V [41]. It has been shown that Dp increases with an increase in temperature [6][42]. In another study, it was reported that Dp increased with current density during potentiostatic hard anodization in the range 140–200 V [28]. Moreover, the pore diameter at the oxide/electrolyte interface (i.e., top surface) is generally larger than that at the pore bottom (i.e., metal/oxide interface). This difference is even greater when the temperature of the electrolyte during anodization is higher and/or the duration of anodization is longer. This can be ascribed to the chemical dissolution of the oxide pore wall by the acidic electrolyte whose reaction kinetics is governed by the temperature and time of anodization. Thus, if the effect of electrochemical parameters on the intrinsic structures of NAA is to be investigated, it is appropriate to report the pore diameter at the pore-bottom rather than that at the top surface.
Recently, it has been shown that in the case of NAA prepared in oxalic acid, Dp was higher when anodization was conducted at a higher bath temperature (close to room temperature) [6][42]. The increased temperature paves the way for the higher chemical etching of the oxide layer, leading to the larger pore diameter close to the surface of NAA compared to that close to the pore bottoms. The pore diameters at the top surface increased from 45 ± 4 to 68 ± 5 nm with increasing temperature due to the increased field-assisted dissolution of alumina as a result of higher current densities. In another recent study, the pore radius of NAA was determined by the flow of various organic liquids with different viscosities through the nanopores under very low Reynolds number conditions [43]. A simple experimental setup was used to measure the pressure difference between the two sides of the NAA membrane. The flow data governed by Poiseuille’s law enabled the pore radii measurement, and the results are consistent with the SEM image analysis. The method is an indirect way of measuring the pore diameter and needs the thickness and pore density to be provided beforehand.

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/nano12030444

References

  1. Thompson, G. Porous anodic alumina: Fabrication, characterization and applications. Thin Solid Film. 1997, 297, 192–201.
  2. Despić, A.; Parkhutik, V.P. Electrochemistry of Aluminum in Aqueous Solutions and Physics of Its Anodic Oxide. In Modern Aspects of Electrochemistry No. 20; Bockris, J.O.M., White, R.E., Conway, B.E., Eds.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1989; pp. 401–503.
  3. Sulka, G.; Stroobants, S.; Moshchalkov, V.; Borghs, G.; Celis, J.-P. Synthesis of well-ordered nanopores by anodizing aluminum foils in sulfuric acid. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2002, 149, D97–D103.
  4. Schwirn, K.; Lee, W.; Hillebrand, R.; Steinhart, M.; Nielsch, K.; Gösele, U. Self-Ordered Anodic Aluminum Oxide Formed by H2SO4 Hard Anodization. ACS Nano 2008, 2, 302–310.
  5. Choudhari, K.; Sudheendra, P.; Udayashankar, N. Fabrication and high-temperature structural characterization study of porous anodic alumina membranes. J. Porous Mater. 2012, 19, 1053–1062.
  6. Choudhari, K.S.; Kulkarni, S.D.; Santhosh, C.; George, S.D. Photoluminescence enhancement and morphological properties of nanoporous anodic alumina prepared in oxalic acid with varying time and temperature. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2018, 271, 138–145.
  7. Masuda, H.; Yada, K.; Osaka, A. Self-ordering of cell configuration of anodic porous alumina with large-size pores in phosphoric acid solution. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 1998, 37, L1340.
  8. Akiya, S.; Kikuchi, T.; Natsui, S.; Suzuki, R.O. Optimum exploration for the self-ordering of anodic porous alumina formed via selenic acid anodizing. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2015, 162, E244–E250.
  9. Nishinaga, O.; Kikuchi, T.; Natsui, S.; Suzuki, R.O. Rapid fabrication of self-ordered porous alumina with 10-/sub-10-nm-scale nanostructures by selenic acid anodizing. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 2748.
  10. Lee, W.; Nielsch, K.; Gösele, U. Self-ordering behavior of nanoporous anodic aluminum oxide (AAO) in malonic acid anodization. Nanotechnology 2007, 18, 475713.
  11. Kikuchi, T.; Yamamoto, T.; Suzuki, R.O. Growth behavior of anodic porous alumina formed in malic acid solution. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2013, 284, 907–913.
  12. Akiya, S.; Kikuchi, T.; Natsui, S.; Sakaguchi, N.; Suzuki, R.O. Self-ordered porous alumina fabricated via phosphonic acid anodizing. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 190, 471–479.
  13. Ma, Y.; Wen, Y.; Li, J.; Lu, J.; Li, Y.; Yang, Y.; Feng, C.; Hao, C.; Zhang, Z.; Hu, J. Pore Nucleation Mechanism of Self-Ordered Alumina with Large Period in Stable Anodization in Citric Acid. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2018, 165, E311–E317.
  14. Mínguez-Bacho, I.; Scheler, F.; Büttner, P.; Bley, K.; Vogel, N.; Bachmann, J. Ordered nanopore arrays with large interpore distances via one-step anodization. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 8385–8390.
  15. Sepúlveda, M.; Castaño, J.G.; Echeverría, F. Influence of temperature and time on the fabrication of self-ordering porous alumina by anodizing in etidronic acid. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 454, 210–217.
  16. Elaish, R.; Curioni, M.; Gowers, K.; Kasuga, A.; Habazaki, H.; Hashimoto, T.; Skeldon, P. Effect of fluorozirconic acid on anodizing of aluminium and AA 2024-T3 alloy in sulphuric and tartaric-sulphuric acids. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2018, 342, 233–243.
  17. Kikuchi, T.; Nishinaga, O.; Natsui, S.; Suzuki, R.O. Fabrication of self-ordered porous alumina via etidronic acid anodizing and structural color generation from submicrometer-scale dimple array. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 156, 235–243.
  18. Takenaga, A.; Kikuchi, T.; Natsui, S.; Suzuki, R.O. Exploration for the self-ordering of porous alumina fabricated via anodizing in etidronic acid. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 211, 515–523.
  19. Nakajima, D.; Kikuchi, T.; Natsui, S.; Suzuki, R.O. Growth behavior of anodic oxide formed by aluminum anodizing in glutaric and its derivative acid electrolytes. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 321, 364–370.
  20. Takenaga, A.; Kikuchi, T.; Natsui, S.; Suzuki, R.O. Self-ordered aluminum anodizing in phosphonoacetic acid and its structural coloration. ECS Solid State Lett. 2015, 4, P55–P58.
  21. Diggle, J.W.; Downie, T.C.; Goulding, C. Anodic oxide films on aluminum. Chem. Rev. 1969, 69, 365–405.
  22. Lohrengel, M.M. Thin anodic oxide layers on aluminium and other valve metals: High field regime. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 1993, 11, 243–294.
  23. Alwitt, R.; Vijh, A. Sparking voltages observed on anodization of some valve metals. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1969, 116, 388.
  24. Lee, W.; Park, S.-J. Porous anodic aluminum oxide: Anodization and templated synthesis of functional nanostructures. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 7487–7556.
  25. Lee, W. The anodization of aluminum for nanotechnology applications. JOM 2010, 62, 57–63.
  26. Jani, A.M.M.; Losic, D.; Voelcker, N.H. Nanoporous anodic aluminium oxide: Advances in surface engineering and emerging applications. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2013, 58, 636–704.
  27. Vega, V.; García, J.; Montero-Moreno, J.M.; Hernando, B.; Bachmann, J.; Prida, V.M.; Nielsch, K. Unveiling the hard anodization regime of aluminum: Insight into nanopores self-organization and growth mechanism. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 28682–28692.
  28. Lee, W.; Kim, J.C.; Gösele, U. Spontaneous current oscillations during hard anodization of aluminum under potentiostatic conditions. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2010, 20, 21–27.
  29. Sun, C.; Luo, J.; Wu, L.; Zhang, J. Self-ordered anodic alumina with continuously tunable pore intervals from 410 to 530 nm. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2010, 2, 1299–1302.
  30. Li, Y.; Ling, Z.; Chen, S.; Wang, J. Fabrication of novel porous anodic alumina membranes by two-step hard anodization. Nanotechnology 2008, 19, 225604.
  31. Chen, X.; Yu, D.; Cao, L.; Zhu, X.; Song, Y.; Huang, H.; Lu, L.; Chen, X. Fabrication of ordered porous anodic alumina with ultra-large interpore distances using ultrahigh voltages. Mater. Res. Bull. 2014, 57, 116–120.
  32. Lee, W.; Ji, R.; Gösele, U.; Nielsch, K. Fast fabrication of long-range ordered porous alumina membranes by hard anodization. Nat. Mater. 2006, 5, 741–747.
  33. Choi, J.; Wehrspohn, R.B.; Gösele, U. Mechanism of guided self-organization producing quasi-monodomain porous alumina. Electrochim. Acta 2005, 50, 2591–2595.
  34. Masuda, H.; Hasegwa, F.; Ono, S. Self-ordering of cell arrangement of anodic porous alumina formed in sulfuric acid solution. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1997, 144, L127.
  35. Schneider, J.J.; Engstler, J.; Budna, K.P.; Teichert, C.; Franzka, S. Freestanding, Highly Flexible, Large Area, Nanoporous Alumina Membranes with Complete through-Hole Pore Morphology. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 2005, 2352–2359.
  36. Vrublevsky, I.; Parkoun, V.; Schreckenbach, J. Analysis of porous oxide film growth on aluminum in phosphoric acid using re-anodizing technique. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2005, 242, 333–338.
  37. Choudhari, K.S.; Jidesh, P.; Sudheendra, P.; Kulkarni, S.D. Quantification and morphology studies of nanoporous alumina membranes: A new algorithm for digital image processing. Microsc. Microanal. 2013, 19, 1061–1072.
  38. Sulka, G.D.; Zaraska, L.; Stepniowski, W.J. Anodic porous alumina as a template for nanofabrication. In Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology; Scientific Publishers: Valencia, Spain, 2011; Volume 11, pp. 261–349.
  39. O’sullivan, J.; Wood, G. The morphology and mechanism of formation of porous anodic films on aluminium. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 1970, 317, 511–543.
  40. Zhao, N.-Q.; Jiang, X.-X.; Shi, C.-S.; Li, J.-J.; Zhao, Z.-G.; Du, X.-W. Effects of anodizing conditions on anodic alumina structure. J. Mater. Sci. 2007, 42, 3878–3882.
  41. Sulka, G.; Parkoła, K. Temperature influence on well-ordered nanopore structures grown by anodization of aluminium in sulphuric acid. Electrochim. Acta 2007, 52, 1880–1888.
  42. Sellarajan, B.; Sharma, M.; Ghosh, S.; Nagaraja, H.; Barshilia, H.C.; Chowdhury, P. Effect of electrolyte temperature on the formation of highly ordered nanoporous alumina template. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2016, 224, 262–270.
  43. Kostaras, C.; Dellis, S.; Christoulaki, A.; Anastassopoulos, D.L.; Spiliopoulos, N.; Vradis, A.; Toprakcioglu, C.; Priftis, G.D. Flow through polydisperse pores in an anodic alumina membrane: A new method to measure the mean pore diameter. J. Appl. Phys. 2018, 124, 204307.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!
ScholarVision Creations
Feedback