The Effect of Parental Styles on Social Skills: History
View Latest Version
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Subjects: Psychology
Contributor:
carlos salavera

Parental educational styles have a significant effect in personal development. These styles (authoritative, democratic, permissive and neglectful) can be related to affects and social skills at the individual level. The results suggest that parenting styles are closely related to affects and social skills. It is also suggested that affects play a mediating role in the relationship between parenting styles and social skills.

  • parenting styles
  • affects
  • social skills

1. Introduction

Family plays a crucial role in the early acquisition of habits, skills and behaviours. Adults, in both families and the school, are essential in the education of children [1][2][3][4]. Individual and contextual factors also play a direct role in educational processes.
Complementing Baumrind’s [5][6] pioneering research on parental styles and the effect of family socialisation on social skills in children and teenagers, MacCoby and Martin [7] developed a typology of four parental styles: authoritative, democratic, permissive and neglectful. These styles result from the combination of two variables: affects and control. As such, parenting styles can be defined as the behaviour of adults as children’s models in terms of everyday choices, decision making, conflict resolution, expectation management and rulemaking. These will determine the children’s behaviours and emotions throughout their lives [8][9].
The socialisation strategies mobilised by parents for the social development and integration of their children can be characterised based on the following criteria: (1) communication levels (acceptance–rejection, warmth–coolness, proximity–distance); (2) the tone of the relationship (affection–hostility); (3) the tools used to channel behaviour (autonomy–control, flexibility–rigidness, permissiveness–restrictions). The combination of these variables results in different parenting styles which, in any case, are only general behavioural trends, because the parent–children relationship is bidirectional [10][11]. As such, although there is some consensus about the division of parenting styles into four broad styles (democratic, authoritative, permissive and neglectful), the norm is for these to mix and evolve according to developments in the family relationship.

1.1. Characteristics of Different Styles

The democratic style is characterised by open shows of parental affection, giving explanations, expressing concern for the needs of the children, promoting desirable behaviours, justifying reprimands and communicating openly. These households are dominated by a democratic environment and emotional warmth. As a result, the children tend to develop good social skills, self-control, initiative, motivation, self-esteem, good morale and realistic self-concept and are generally happy, spontaneous, reliable, committed (altruism, solidarity), sociable, both within and outside the household, prone to achieve and unlikely to cause parent–children conflicts [2][3][4][12].
The authoritative style is characterised by detailed and rigid rules, prioritising punishment over praise, blaming children for mistakes, closed and unidirectional communication (no dialogue), frequent asserting of parental authority and an autocratic environment. As a result, children have little autonomy and self-confidence, poor social skills, low creativity, they are prone to aggression and impulsiveness and tend to adopt heteronomous moral standards (avoidance of punishment) and they are less happy and spontaneous [2][3][4][13][14][15].
The permissive style is characterised by a lack of concern for the children’s negative or positive behaviour, passiveness, the children’s misbehaviour tends to go unpunished, all the children’s impulses are tolerated and authority is insufficiently asserted, no restrictions are imposed and the wishes of children are easily granted. As a result, children tend to develop poor social skills, low self-esteem weak self-identity poor self-control and hetero-control, lack of emotional stability, negative self-concept, poor self-concept and self-responsibility, insecurity, little regard for the rules and for others and academic underachievement [2][3][4][16][17].
The neglectful style is characterised by emotional indifference towards the children’s issues, parental relinquishment of responsibility, lack of motivation, commitment and involvement and immaturity. As a result, children develop poor social skills, impulsivity and aggression and tend to lack motivation, commitment and maturity [2][3][4][18][19].
To some extent, these parenting styles, along with other household factors, such as the school environment, relation with peers and individual traits such as personality and social skills, determine the individual’s behaviour [20][21][22][23][24][25][26].
On the other hand, affects are defined as a binary relationship between positive and negative emotions, which is grounded, according to Watson and Tellegen [27], on a hereditary base. According to this view, positive affects relate to pleasant emotions: motivation, affiliation, achievement and success. Negative affects, for their part, relate to unpleasant emotions: fear, inhibition, insecurity, frustration and failure [28][29][30]. In this way, a person dominated by positive affects generally harbours positive feelings such as satisfaction, enthusiasm, energy, friendship, attachment, affirmation and trust. They are, therefore, extroverted, optimistic and resilient. Conversely, a person dominated by negative affects tend to harbour negative feelings such as detachment, boredom, sadness, guilt, shame and envy. They are, therefore, prone to react to negative stimuli aggressively and to emotional lability, stress and negative views [31][32][33].
Finally, social skills can be defined as a set of abilities used in interpersonal relationships and interactions. They determine a person’s ability to act in a way that leads to rewards and avoids punishment and social ostracism [34][35][36]. That is, they are a set of skills that expresses an individual’s feelings, attitudes, wishes and opinions in an interpersonal setting. Good social skills tend to solve immediate interpersonal conflicts and minimise the chance for future confrontations [37][38]. These skills are chiefly acquired through training, observation, imitation, trial and information; that is, they are acquired traits. Nobody is born with a given repertoire of social skills; they are learned behaviours. There are two major types of social skills, basic and complex, and the former needs to be learned before the latter can be acquired. The learning process begins during childhood and develops largely during adolescence, when adult communicational and relational skills are acquired. Social skills are a necessary tool for positive social relations to lead to personal wellbeing [39][40].

1.2. Parenting Styles, Affects and Social Skills

Parenting styles, affects and social skills play a crucial role in personal development and in the way individuals handle themselves in social contexts.
Affects and social skills can act as risk or protection factors with regard to problematic behaviours during adolescence. Increasing personal autonomy, changes in family relationships, the transition from specific to formal thinking, shifting social relations, etc., are factors that shape the psychosocial development of the individual, in which the family plays a central role. Parenting styles and family relationships around adolescents are a key factor in their emotional, social and personal development [4][41]. These notions (parenting styles, affects and social skills) can be related, with the parenting styles having an effect on the other variables.
Finally, it is worth mentioning that parenting styles will have different effects on each individual, based on their personal traits. That is, there is no correct parenting style, which must instead adapt to the individual traits and environmental conditions, as pointed out by Aroca and Cánovas [42].

2. Current Insights of the Relationship between Parenting styles, Affects and Social Skills

Gender differences are among the most widely studied factors in these relationships [43][44]. Some studies suggest that fathers are more prone to authoritative parental styles and mothers to more inductive styles [45][46][47][48][49][50]. The results indicate that democratic parenting styles are adopted by a similar percentage of fathers and mothers. Meanwhile, permissive styles are more often applied to women and authoritative styles to men. Finally, neglectful parenting styles are somewhat more commonly applied to men. This could be the result of a greater percentage of men presenting behavioural problems, forcing parents to adopt disciplinary measures [51] and apply punishments [48][52]. The results indicate that affects and social skills are related to parenting styles. Previous studies have pointed out that parental affection is related to children’s psychological wellbeing [18][53][54][55], and this was confirmed here. Higher scores in terms of negative affects were also attested among women, as also pointed out in previous studies [56] that yielded higher scores in the social-skills-related variable emotional support, emphasising the important role played by affect in social skills, as noted in the existing literature [57][58][59].
Permissive parenting styles, on the other hand, result in higher scores in terms of negative affects than the other parenting styles, and one out of five of the respondents educated under a permissive regime scored high in this variable. In addition, people educated under a permissive regime scored high in terms of emotional support, as suggested by some studies that argue that permissive parenting styles offer better chances of psychosocial fit to children than democratic styles [60][61][62]. Authoritative parenting styles lead to higher scores in either positive or negative affects than those yielded by democratic and permissive parenting styles. This agrees with the idea that authoritative parenting styles are related to such aspects as low self-esteem and self-concept and poor social skills [63][64]. Finally, neglectful parenting styles lead to low scores in positive affects and all variables related to social skills. These results suggest that neglectful parenting styles have a negative effect in the socialisation of children, wellbeing, self-esteem, autonomy and social skills [18][65].
Gender and age variables were taken into account and were found not to have a significant impact on the relationship between parenting styles and social skills. The results indicate that parenting styles have a mediating effect on positive and negative affects, strongly suggesting that parenting styles play a significant emotional role, in line with previous studies, which have related parenting styles to other variables such as subjective wellbeing [66][67]. 

3. Conclusions

It is suggested that parenting styles are related to affects and social skills. It is also indicated that affects play a mediating role in the relationship between parenting styles and social skills. Finally, owing to the implications of parenting styles not only for affects and social skills but for the overall psychological, social and personal development of children, it is concluded that these issues should be addressed jointly by families and schools. 

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/ijerph19063295

References

  1. Cámara, A.; López, J.B. Estilos de educación en el ámbito familiar. Rev. Española Orientac. Psicopedag. 2011, 22, 257–276.
  2. Doinita, N.E.; Maria, N.D. Attachment and parenting styles. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2015, 203, 199–204.
  3. Fan, J.; Chen, B.B. Parenting styles and co-parenting in China: The role of parents and children’s sibling status. Curr. Psychol. 2020, 39, 1505–1512.
  4. Newman, B.M.; Newman, P.R. Theories of Adolescent Development; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020.
  5. Baumrind, D. Child care practices anteceding three patterns of preschool behavior. Genet. Psychol. 1967, 75, 43–88.
  6. Baumrind, D. Current patterns of parental authority. Dev. Psychol. 1971, 4 Pt 2, 1–103.
  7. Maccoby, E.E.; Martin, J.A. Socialization in the context of the family: Parent-child interaction. In Handbook of Child Psychology: Vol. IV—Socialization, Personality and Social Development, 4th ed.; Mussen, P.H., Hetheringtono, E.M., Eds.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1983; pp. 1–101.
  8. Jorge, E.; González, M.C. Estilos de crianza parental: Una revisión teórica. Inf. Psicol. 2017, 17, 39–66.
  9. Morris, A.S.; Ratliff, E.L.; Cosgrove, K.T.; Steinberg, L. We know even more things: A decade review of parenting research. J. Res. Adolesc. 2021, 31, 870–888.
  10. Bocanegra, E. Las prácticas de crianza entre la Colonia y la Indepen-dencia de Colombia: Los discursos que las enuncian y las hacen visibles. Rev. Latinoam. Cienc. Soc. Niñez Juv. 2007, 5, 1–22.
  11. Burke, J.D.; Pardini, D.A.; Loeber, R. Reciprocal relationships between parenting behavior and disruptive psychopathology from childhood through adolescence. J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 2008, 36, 679–692.
  12. Miklikowka, M.; Hurme, H. Democracy begins at home: Democratic parenting and adolescents’ support for democratic values. Eur. J. Dev. Psychol. 2011, 8, 541–557.
  13. Bi, X.; Yang, Y.; Li, H.; Wang, M.; Zhang, W.; Deater-Deckard, K. Parenting styles and parent–adolescent relationships: The mediating roles of behavioral autonomy and parental authority. Front. Psychol. 2018, 9, 2187.
  14. Li, G.; Wang, B. Effect of authoritative parenting and family relation on adolescent leadership: The mediating role of general self-concept. Int. J. Psychol. 2016, 51, 375.
  15. Lavric, M.; Naterer, A. The power of authoritative parenting: A cross-national study of effects of exposure to different parenting styles on life satisfaction. Child. Youth Serv. Rev. 2020, 116, 105274.
  16. Calders, F.; Bijttebier, P.; Bosmans, G.; Ceulemans, E.; Colpin, H.; Goossens, L.; Van Den Noortgate, W.; Verschueren, K.; Van Leeuwen, K. Investigating the interplay between parenting dimensions and styles, and the association with adolescent outcomes. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2020, 29, 327–342.
  17. Kuppens, S.; Ceulemans, E. Parenting styles: A closer look at a well-known concept. J. Child Fam. Stud. 2019, 28, 168–181.
  18. Torío, S.; Peña, J.V.; Rodríguez, M.C. Estilos educativos parentales: Revisión bibliográfica y reformulación teórica. Teoría Educ. 2008, 20, 151–178.
  19. Wong, T.K.Y.; Konishi, C.; Kong, X. Parenting and prosocial behaviors: A meta-analysis. Soc. Dev. 2021, 30, 343–373.
  20. Bagán, G.; Tur-Porcar, A.M.; Llorca, A. Learning and Parenting in Spanish Environments: Prosocial Behavior, Aggression, and Self-Concept. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5193.
  21. Fan, W.Q.; Li, M.T.; Chen, X.Y. Reciprocal relationship between parenting styles and interpersonal personality in Chinese adolescents. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 740026.
  22. Gallarin, M.; Alonso-Arbiol, I. Parenting practices, parental attachment and aggressiveness in adolescence: A predictive model. J. Adolesc. 2012, 35, 1601–1610.
  23. Malonda, E.; Llorca, A.; Mesurado, B.; Samper, P.; Mestre, M.V. Parents or peers? Predictors of prosocial behavior and aggression: A longitudinal study. Front. Psychol. 2019, 10, 2379.
  24. Marcone, R.; Borrone, A.; Caputo, A. Peer interaction and social competence in childhood and early adolescence: The affects of parental behaviour. J. Fam. Stud. 2021, 27, 178–195.
  25. Marimon, M.P.; Alvarez, G.Y.O. Incidence of parental competences in the development of social skills in kids form single children families. Interdisciplinaria 2021, 38, 101–116.
  26. Tomsik, R.; Ceresnik, M. Adolescent’s personality through big five model: The relation with parenting styles. AD Alta-J. Interdiscip. Res. 2017, 7, 225–231.
  27. Watson, D.; Tellegen, A. Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychol. Bull. 1985, 98, 219–235.
  28. Ciocanel, O.; Power, K.; Eriksen, A.; Gillings, K. Effectiveness of positive youths development interventions: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J. Youth Adolesc. 2017, 46, 483–504.
  29. Ditcheva, M.; Vrshek-Schallhorn, S.; Batista, A. People who need people: Trait loneliness influences positive affect as a function of interpersonal context. Biol. Psychol. 2018, 136, 181–188.
  30. Watson, D.; Clark, L.A.; Tellegen, A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1988, 54, 1063–1070.
  31. Clark, L.A.; Watson, D. Tripartite model of anxiety and depression: Psychometric evidence and taxonomicimplications. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 1991, 100, 316–336.
  32. Crawford, J.R.; Henry, J.D. The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS): Construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. Br. J. Clin. Psychol. 2004, 43, 245–265.
  33. Flores-Kanter, P.E.; Garrido, L.E.; Moretti, L.S.; Medrano, L.A. A modern network approach to revisiting the Positive and Negative Affective Schedule (PANAS) construct validity. J. Clin. Psychol. 2021, 77, 2370–2404.
  34. Agran, M.; Hughes, C.; Thoma, C.A.; Scott, L.A. Employment social skills: What skills are really valued? Career Dev. Transit. Except. Individ. 2016, 39, 111–120.
  35. Furlow, C.M. What is behavior? In Handbook of Behavioral Interventions in Schools; Radley, K.C., Dart, E.H., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2018; pp. 1–14.
  36. Kinnaman, J.E.S.; Bellack, A.S. Social Skills. In Cognitive Behavior Therapy: Core Principles for Practice; O’Donohue, W., Fisher, J.E., Eds.; John Wiley and Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2012.
  37. Caballo, V. Manual de Evaluación y Entrenamiento de las Habilidades Sociales; Siglo XXI: Madrid, Spain, 2015.
  38. Radley, K.C.; Dart, E.H. What are social skills? In Social Skills Teaching for Individuals with Autism; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 11–21.
  39. Lent, R.W.; Taveira, D.M.C.; Figuera, P.; Dorio, I.; Faria, S.; Gonçalves, A.M. Test of the social cognitive model of well-being in Spanish college students. J. Career Assess. 2017, 25, 135–143.
  40. Pannebakker, F.D.; Van Genugten, L.; Diekstra, R.F.; Gravesteijn, C.; Fekkes, M.; Kuiper, R.; Kocken, P.L. A social gradient in the effects of the skills for life program on self-efficacy and mental wellbeing of adolescent students. J. Sch. Health 2019, 89, 587.
  41. Hunter, S.B.; Barber, B.K.; Stolz, H.E. Extending knowledge of parents’ role in adolescent development: The mediating effect of self-steem. J. Child Fam. Stud. 2015, 24, 2474–2484.
  42. Aroca, C.; Cánovas, P.; Alba, J.L. Características de las familias que sufren violencia filio-parental: Un estudio de revisión. Educ. Siglo XXI 2012, 30, 231–254.
  43. Barton, A.L.; Kirtley, M.S. Gender differences in the relationships among parenting styles and college student mental health. J. Am. Coll. Health 2012, 60, 21–26.
  44. Lin, Y.C.; Billingham, R.E. Relationship between parenting styles and gender role identity in college students. Psychol. Rep. 2014, 114, 250–271.
  45. Tur-Porcar, A.; Mestre, V.; Samper, P.; Malonda, E. Crianza y agresividad de los menores: ¿Es diferente la influencia del padre y de la madre? Psicothema 2012, 24, 284–288.
  46. Gámez-Guadix, M.; Almendros, C. Parental discipline in Spain and in the United States: Differences by country, parent-child gender and education level. Infanc. Aprendiz. 2015, 38, 569–599.
  47. Tur-Porcar, A.; Mestre, V.; Llorca, A. Estilos parentales: Análisis psicométrico de dos estudios en población española. Anu. Psicol. 2015, 45, 347–359.
  48. Sorbring, E.; Rödholm-Funnemark, M.; Palmérus, K. Boys’ and girls’ perceptions of parental discipline in transgression situations. Infant Child Dev. 2003, 12, 53–69.
  49. Winsler, A.; Madigan, A.L.; Aquilino, S.A. Correspondence between maternal and paternal parenting styles in early childhood. Early Child. Res. Q. 2005, 20, 1–12.
  50. Zervides, S.; Knowles, A. Generational changes in parenting styles and the effect of culture. E-J. Appl. Psychol. 2007, 3, 65–75.
  51. León-del-Barco, B.; Mendo-Lázaro, S.; Polo-del-Río, M.I.; López-Rams, V.M. Parental psychological control and emotional and behavioral disorders among Spanish adolescents. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 507.
  52. Rosa-Alcázar, A.I.; Parada-Navas, P.; Rosa-Alcázar, A. Síntomas psicopatológicos en adolescentes españoles: Relación con los estilos parentales percibidos y la autoestima. An. Psicol. 2014, 30, 133–142.
  53. Aguirre-Dávila, E. Prácticas de crianza, temperamento y comportamiento prosocial de estudiantes de educación básica. Rev. Latinoam. Cienc. Soc. Niñez Juv. 2015, 13, 223–243.
  54. Aziz, M.; Khan, W.; Amin, F.; Khan, M.F. Influence of parenting styles and peer attachment on life satisfaction among adolescents: Mediation role of self-esteem. Fam. J. 2021, in press.
  55. Fuentes, M.C.; García, F.; Gracia, E.; Alarcón, A. Los estilos parentales de socialización y el ajuste psicológico. Un estudio con adolescentes españoles. Rev. Psicodidáctica 2015, 20, 117–138.
  56. Salavera, C.; Usán, P.; Antoñanzas, J.L.; Teruel, P.; Lucha, O. Affects and personality: A study with university students. Ann. Med. Psychol. 2017, 175, 353–357.
  57. Gómez-Leal, R.; Megías-Robles, A.; Gutiérrez-Cobo, M.J.; Cabello, R.; Fernández-Berrocal, P. Personal risk and protective factors involved in aggressive behavior. J. Interpers. Violence 2020, 37, NP1489–NP1515.
  58. Salavera, C.; Usán, P.; Jarie, L. Emotional intelligence and social skills on self-efficacy in Secondary Education students. Are there gender differences? J. Adolesc. 2017, 60, 39–46.
  59. Trigueros, R.; Sanchez-Sanchez, E.; Mercader, I.; Aguilar-Parra, J.M.; López-Liria, R.; Morales-Gázquez, M.J.; Fernández-Campoy, J.M.; Rocamora, P. Relationship between Emotional Intelligence, Social Skills and Peer Harassment. A Study with High School Students. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 4208.
  60. Möller, E.L.; Nikolić, M.; Majdandžić, M.; Bögels, S.M. Associations between maternal and paternal parenting behaviors, anxiety and its precursors in early childhood: A meta-analysis. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 2016, 45, 17–33.
  61. García, O.F.; Serra, E.; Zacarés, J.J.; García, F. Parenting styles and short- and long-term socialization outcomes: A study among Spanish adolescents and older adults. Psychosoc. Interv. 2018, 27, 153–161.
  62. Hadfield, K.; Amos, M.; Ungar, M.; Gosselin, J.; Ganong, L. Do changes to family structure affect child and family outcomes? A systematic review of the Instability Hypothesis. J. Fam. Theory Rev. 2018, 10, 87–110.
  63. Latsch, D.C.; Nett, J.C.; Humbelin, O. Poly-victimization and its relationship with emotional and social adjustmente in adolescence: Evidence from a National Survey of Switzerland. Psychol. Violence 2017, 7, 1–11.
  64. Lawall, A.R.; Tram, J.M.; Kumar, N. The impact of parenting styles on subsequent parenting styles in sons. Fam. J. 2021, in press.
  65. Pinquart, M.; Gerke, D.C. Associations of parenting styles with self-esteem in children and adolescents: A Meta-analysis. J. Child Fam. Stud. 2019, 28, 2017–2035.
  66. Chan, T.W.; Koo, A. Parenting style and youth outcomes in the UK. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 2011, 27, 385–399.
  67. Milevsky, A.; Schlechter, M.; Netter, S.; Keehn, D. Maternal and paternal parenting styles in adolescents: Associations with self-esteem, depression and life-satisfaction. J. Child Fam. Stud. 2007, 16, 39–47.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!
Feedback