Crocus pallidus (Iridaceae): History
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Subjects: Plant Sciences
Contributor:

The genus Crocus L., with a center of diversity on the Balkan Peninsula and Asia Minor, constitutes 235 species. For a long time, the Balkan endemic species Crocus pallidus has been unconfirmed and neglected for the flora of Bulgaria. It has remained an uncertain species from the Balkans, often listed as a synonym of C. weldenii. The morphological resemblance to the albinistic forms of C. chrysanthus has led to incorrect identification in the past, resulting in uncertainty regarding the distribution of this species in Bulgaria.

  • Iridaceae
  • Bulgaria
  • ITS region
  • Crocus pallidus
  • Crocus thracicus
  • Nudiscapus
  • anatomy
  • morphology

1. Introduction

The genus Crocus L., with a center of diversity on the Balkan Peninsula and Asia Minor [1], constitutes 235 species [2]. The number of species has increased due to the descriptions of the new species from this area in the last few years [3][4]. However, a taxonomic revision of the genus Crocus in Bulgarian flora has not been conducted in the last 50 years. After the last taxonomic treatment in Bulgaria, the genus included nine species [5]Crocus pallidus Kitan. & Drenk. was reported as a new species, based on the revised specimens of C. chrysanthus Herb. var. albidus Maw, collected from the region of North Macedonia [6]. Later, this species persisted in the research of Kitanov et al. [7] and was included in the list of species for the flora of Dobrudja [8]. For more than 35 years, this species has been neglected in the Bulgarian floristic literature and identification keys [9]. However, C. pallidus was mentioned in a review for the Balkan endemics in Bulgaria [10]. On the basis of the publication of Kitanov et al. [7], the fourth edition of “Conspectus of the Bulgarian Vascular Flora” [11] included C. pallidus, with a distribution range along the Black Sea Coast (Northern) and Northeast Bulgaria. Kitanov and other authors collected the available deposited materials from Bulgarian sites during 1965–1972. The limited studies so far have caused a lack of morphological and anatomical characteristics for C. pallidus in the referent taxonomic sources. Various authors have perceived white-flowered crocuses in the Balkans with different taxonomic statuses. Pulević [12] considered that the specimens described by Kitanov & Drenkovsky represent C. chrysanthus var. citrinus Velen. Crocus pallidus was neglected by Mathew [13] and noted as a heterotypic synonym of C. weldenii Hoppe & Fürnrohr. This has probably been the reason for C. pallidus being listed as a synonym of C. weldenii in the system of WCSP [14].
Crocus weldenii is a taxon with controversial taxonomic status. It has been perceived as a subspecies of C. biflorus s.l. [13]. This taxon is Balkan-endemic and Illyrian–Adriatic-endemic, distributed from Trieste to the border of Albania, with general distribution in Slovenia, Croatia, Herzegovina, Montenegro, Serbia, and North Macedonia [15]. The northwestern border of the species’ range reaches the vicinity of Trieste in NE Italy [16][17][18].
According to Ranđelović et al. [19], both species are found in Serbia. Crocus weldenii inhabits the hilly and southern regions, while C. pallidus is a species from the mountainous and more northern areas. The taxonomical status of C. pallidus remains very unclear [2].
All members of the genus Crocus have shown exclusively high diversity in their chromosome numbers [20]. The chromosome number of C. biflorus sensu Mathew (1982) varies between 2n = 8 and 2n = 36 [21]. The changes in the chromosome number in the related species play an important role in the speciation [22][23]. This could be an important feature if the close related taxa are different according to taxonomic numbers. Nevertheless, the representatives of the group discussed here have different morphology and the same chromosome number. The cytological models in Crocus are complex, with extensive dysploidy, and not satisfactorily explained [13].
The white-flowering crocuses on the Balkan Peninsula and Adriatic coast [19] have not been covered by the recent molecular and phylogenetic studies [24][25]. Furthermore, no annotated ITS sequences of C. pallidus were found in the NCBI GenBank Nucleotide database [26].
In the protologue of the older taxonomic literature, the morphology of C. pallidus has been laconic and incompletely reflected [5][17], which also leads to uncertainty of its status. A species named C. thracicus with a similar but more detailed morphology was described in northwest Turkey [27].
The information about the species in the Bulgarian floristic literature is based on sporadic reports, without precise localities and current diagnostic data. The various assumptions about the taxon have led to confusion and neglect in the Bulgarian literature. Moreover, the contradictory taxonomic treatments of white-flowered Crocuses from the Balkans need further study of a more thorough sample.

2. Description Based on Bulgarian Materials

A spring synanthous geophyte is shown in Figure 1 with the following features: corm oval-suborbicular, 13.5–25 mm in diameter, with membranous-coriaceous tunic, yellowish-brown, with separating basal rings; Basal rings 1.2–2.5 mm thick (Figure 1G) with unclear, slightly visible irregular dentation; plant height 100–210 mm; leaves 4–6(–7), 0.8–2.3 mm wide; flowers 2–3(–4); perigone segments niveous-white or outer ones with sprayed pale-blue coloration (Figure 1A,C); rounded to slightly acuminate; 19–33 × 6–11 mm long and 15–26 × 5–12 mm wide; perigone tube 6–10 cm long, white or bluish–lilac. (Figure 2); throat glabrous, white; filaments 3.8–10 mm; anthers 8–12(16) mm long with blackish basal lobes, or exceptionally with blackish stripes on the internal side, along the thecas (Figure 1B), on both sides of the white connective; stigma orange-reddish, trilobate (stylodia 3–5 mm), usually shorter than or equal to anther length; Capsule ellipsoid 15–21 × 4.3–7.4 mm (Figure 1D); seeds oval, dark brown 2.3–3.4 × 1.5–2.1 mm.
Figure 1. Morphological features of Crocus pallidus (specimen SOA 062791, grid 1 mm): (A) whole plant; (Β) anthers and stigma; (C) flower section; (D) mature capsules; (E) seeds; (F) corm; (G) basal rings and bottom of the corm.
Figure 2. Variation in the color of the outer perigone segments of Crocus pallidus—white and speckled violet (population with voucher 062791).
A comparison with the known morphological features of the closely related species is provided in Table 1.
Table 1. A comparison of morphological features of Crocus pallidus (current data), C. weldenii [13][17], and C. thracicus [27].
  C. pallidus C. weldenii C thracicus
Corm 13.5–25 mm 13–19.7 mm 10–12 mm
Plant height (8)10–20 cm 8–17 cm 7.35–12 mm
Teeth of the basal rings Irregular Regular/Irregular Irregular
Count of leaves 3–5 3–5 3–4(–5)
Leaf width 0.84–2.3 mm max 1 mm 0.75–1.3 mm
Ribs on the abaxial leaf surface Missing or vaguely visible 1–2, clearly visible Missing
Color of the perigone tube White, rarely violet White, often violet White, rarely violet near the apex
Color of outer perigone segments White or sprayed in violet White White or sprayed in violet
Size of perigone segments (out/in) 19–33 × 6–11/15–26 × 5–12 mm 19–37 × 4.8–12.8 17–24 × 6–9/14.6–23 × 5.7–8.7 mm
Perigone throat Glabrous, white Yellow Glabrous, white
Filaments 3.8–13.7 mm 8–16 mm 10–13.5 mm
Anthers 8–16 mm, yellow, with blackish basal lobes, or entirely black edge yellow, without blackish lobes 7.3–11.8 mm, yellow, with blackish basal lobes.
Capsule Ellipsoid; 15–21 mm long; 4.3–7.4 mm wide.   Ellipsoid, about 14 mm long
Seeds 2.2–3.4 × 1.5–2.1 mm, with convex caruncle   2.5 mm in diameter, with convex caruncle
Distribution Bulgaria (Eastern parts), North Macedonia, Serbia. Italy, Albania, Serbia. Turkey in Europe (Thrakia)
Elevation 30–190 m 100–750 m 45–170 m
Flowering period February–March   February–March

3. Distribution

The species is Balkan-endemic. The distribution area extends over the territory from Serbia (eastern and southeastern), through Kosovo, North Macedonia, Bulgaria, and probably the European part of Turkey. The Black Sea coast represents the eastern border (Figure 3).
Figure 3. Localities of Crocus pallidus (A) in Bulgaria and C. thracicus (B) in Turkey. Map created at GPSVisualizer.com (accessed on 16 March 2021). Leaflet | NGS maps from ESRI/ArcGIS.

4. Phenology and Habitats

The flowering period lasts from the end of January to the end of March. The population of C. pallidus near the village of Kamen Bryag (SOA 062791) inhabits the open grass communities in the margin of an oak grove, accompanied by individuals of Paliurus spina-christi Mill., Ficaria verna Huds., Crocus chrysanthus (Herb.) Herb., Geranium mole L., Fragaria vesca L., Viola sp. div., Trifolium sp. div., Poaceae sp. div., and tufts of mosses. The whole habitat is surrounded by agricultural land. Approximately 150–200 individuals represent the population. A dense sympatric population of C. chrysanthus was found inside the grove. On the margin of the grove, populations of both species are mixed, whereas hybrids may occur (Figure 4). The locality is under anthropogenic pressure due to agricultural work, the main road laying on the western border of the population, and proximity to Kamen Bryag.
Figure 4. Crocus pallidus (A), C. chrysanthus (C), and their hybrid (Β) in the population with voucher 062791.
The population in Pomorie Narrow (SOA 062791) exists in sparse oak forest with the same accompanying species and Anemone blanda Schott & Kotchy. The few observed individuals of C. chrysanhus were flowering earlier than C. pallidus flowering time. The anthropogenic pressure is also significant (the habitat is an illegal landfill for household waste).
Under high anthropogenic pressure is the locus classicus of C. p. f. bulgaricus Kitan. & Drenk. It is an oak grove, subjected to unregulated logging and pollution, situated on the main road near the city of Dobrich (SO 21305).
The population near the Rudnik suburb of Burgas (SOA 063064) is under relatively low anthropogenic pressure. It is located in an open habitat, protected by the shrubs of Paliurus, and accompanied by C. chrysanthus.

5. Leaf Anatomy

The anatomical features of C. pallidus from the evaluated populations are presented in Table 2.
Table 2. Anatomical parameters of the examined populations of Crocus pallidus. Values are given as a range (minimum–maximum), mean ± standard deviation.
Population * 062791
Kamen Bryag
062797
Pomorie Narrow
063064
Roudnik
Section width, µm 1701–2224
1927.6 ± 133
955–1722
1210.9 ± 193
910–2017
1432.6 ± 327.9
Section height, µm 709–807
761.1 ± 39.8
356–664
481.8 ± 89.2
480–633
562.8 ± 54.8
Arm width, µm 657–973
830.1 ± 96.3
385–696
547.2 ± 91.1
455–1071
703.4 ± 146.6
White stripe to leaf width ratio, % 15.1–21
17.4 ± 2
12.7–28.8
20 ± 4.2
14.9–19.3
16.64 ±1.5
Vascular bundles, count 23–25
23.8 ± 1
13–15
13.8 ± 1
15–17
15.5 ± 0.3
Vascular bundles, height, μm 25.9–177
81.7 ± 45.3
27.5–187
95.6 ± 45.8
33.2–190
104.6 ± 50.1
Vascular bundles, width, μm 17.9–103
59.2 ± 24.6
22.9–141
73.2 ±36.5
23.9–127
74 ± 29.8
Vascular tissues in the bundles, % 22.2–50.7
37.3 ± 8.2
7–61
19.9 ±9.3
4.1–30.8
19.4 ± 7.7
Palisade tissue: thickness, μm 13.7–77
44 ± 14.5
38–80
56.8 ± 8.8
25.1–75
57.9 ± 11.2
Spongy tissue-thickness, μm 25–91
48 ± 16.6
43–104
61.6 ± 13.8
33.8–65
46.3 ± 9.7
White stripe, µm 287–407
341 ± 49.2
150–295
241.1 ± 44.5
247–305
276.9 ± 22.8
Adaxial epidermal cell: length, µm 173–290
236 ± 47.3
98–431
237.2 ± 61.7
155–473
286.2 ± 66.8
Adaxial epidermal cell: height, µm 15–23.8
18.5 ± 1.96
11–22.6
17.83 ± 2.56
6.7–21
15.3 ± 3
Adaxial epidermal cell: width, µm 10.4–23.1
17.5 ± 2.93
11.5–20.8
16.45 ± 2.4
9.8–23.5
16.8 ± 3
Palisade cell: height, µm 13.8–36.4
26.4 ± 4.25
21.3–40.7
32.1 ± 6.49
17.2–41.3
30.3 ± 5.3
Palisade cell: width, µm 8.8–21.2
13.9 ± 2.47
9.6–18.6
13.53 ± 2.46
8.9–17.5
12.7 ± 2
Spongy cell: height, µm 14.4–29.6
21.4 ± 3.14
19.1–25.1
22.36 ± 2.07
13.9–28.6
20.7 ± 4.1
Spongy cell: width, µm 8.3–23.1
14.7 ± 3.39
13.7–17.9
15.74 ± 1.57
7.4–21.5
14.2 ± 2.6
Abaxial epidermal cell: height, µm 11.2–24.3
19.6 ± 2.92
15–28
18.2 ± 3.33
7.7–18.1
13.5 ± 2.7
* The populations are represented by the number of the voucher specimens in SOA.
The leaves in genus Crocus have a unique bifacial profile of the cross-section, with central rectangular or square keel, and two lateral arms.
In the investigated populations, the keel is square to rectangular, with a wide base, and with a wide white stripe (15–30% of the leaf width). The lateral zones are convex due to the developed mesophyll around the bigger vascular bundles (Figure 5).
Figure 5. Crocus pallidus leaf cross-sections (4×). Abbreviations: ad—adaxial side, ab—abaxial side, la—lacuna area. Voucher numbers are shown near the cross-sections.
The arms’ length and their curving degree vary in the investigated populations. The ribs are present on the abaxial side of the arms (Figure 6B,E). Papillae are located in the apical regions of the arms and along the ribs (Figure 6A).
Figure 6. Leaf anatomy of Crocus pallidus. (A) Papilles on the ribs—adaxial surface; (B) section of the shoulder (SOA 062791); (C) detail of the leaf with visible adaxial stomata (SOA 062797); (D) crystals; (E) subterminal vascular bundle in the shoulder; (F) adaxial epidermis with stomata; (G) abaxial epidermis with stomata (SOA 062791). Abbreviations: ad—adaxial side, ab—abaxial side, la—lacuna area, e—epidermis, pp—palisade parenchyma, sp—spongy parenchyma, sc—sclerenchyma cap, ph—phloem, xy—xylem.
The adaxial epidermal cells are rectangular, with a thicker cuticle. The abaxial epidermal cells are elliptic in shape, while the cuticle layer is thinner. The stomata are located on the abaxial side of the leaves, (Figure 6E,G) in the zones of the arms and keel. The stomatal type is anomocytic. Single stomata are also sporadically present on the abaxial epidermis (Figure 6C,F).
The parenchyma in the central zone of the keel is represented by big rectangular cells with thin walls and without chloroplasts, forming a lacuna zone, visible like a white stripe along the leaf blade. The assimilating mesophyll in the zone of the arms consists of palisade and spongy layers. The palisade cells are oblong, organized in two rows, without any space between them. The spongy cells form zones of 2–4 rows near the abaxial epidermis, between the ribs. They have an elliptic to irregular shape, with slightly visible intercellular spaces between them (Figure 6C,E). Crystalline formations as oxalate sand or crystals with an approximately cubic shape are present in all three studied populations of C. pallidus (Figure 6D).
The vascular bundles are collateral, located in a row along the arms and the keel zone. The vascular tissues take 7–40(–61)% while the remaining bundles (about 2/3) consist of sclerenchymatous “caps”. The subterminal bundles in the folding area of the arms are bigger than the other (81–187 μm × 56–141 μm). The terminal bundles in the keel are the biggest in that area (89–190 μm × 70–136 μm). The number and size of the other bundles vary depending on the width of the section. The population from Kamen Bryag (SOA 062791) shows a bigger number of vascular bundles. Despite the quantitative variation in their number, in all of the sections, the biggest vascular bundle is subterminal, followed by 1–3 narrower terminal bundles in the shoulder.

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/plants11050686

References

  1. Harpke, D.; Meng, S.; Rutten, T.; Kerndorff, H.; Blattner, F.R. Phylogeny of Crocus (Iridaceae) based on one chloroplast and two nuclear loci: Ancient hybridization and chromosome number evolution. Mol. Phylogenetics Evol. 2013, 66, 617–627.
  2. Rukšāns, J. The World of Crocuses; Latvian Academy of Sciences: Riga, Latvia, 2017; p. 568.
  3. Yüzbaşıoğlu, S. Crocus keltepensis (Iridaceae): A new Crocus species from the highest part of the Samanlı Mountains, NW Turkey. Phytotaxa 2019, 418, 230–236.
  4. Raca, I.; Harpke, D.; Shuka, L.; Ranđelović, V. A new species of Crocus ser. Verni (Iridaceae) with 2n = 12 chromosomes from the Balkans. Plant Biosyst.—Int. J. Deal. All Asp. Plant Biol. 2020, 1–7.
  5. Velchev, V. Crocus L. In Flora Reipublicae Popularis Bulgaricae, 2nd ed.; Jordanov, D., Ed.; Academia Scientarum Bulgaricae: Sofia, Bulgaria, 1964; pp. 328–338.
  6. Kitanov, B.; Drenkovski, R. Über die Taxonomie einiger Sippen der Gattung Crocus L. auf der Balkanhalbinsel. In Problems of Balkan Flora and Vegetation, Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Balkan Flora and Vegetation, Varna, Bulgaria, 7–14 June 1973; Bulgarian Academy of Science: Sofia, Bulgaria, 1975; pp. 212–215.
  7. Kitanov, B.; Penev, I.; Krachunov, I. Materials on the flora of Dobroudja. Annu. Sofia Univ. St. Kliment Ohridski Fac. Biol. 1977, 70, 85–87.
  8. Kitanov, B.; Penev, I. Flora of Dobroudja; Naouka & Izkoustvo: Sofia, Bulgaria, 1980; p. 630.
  9. Delipavlov, D. Crocus L. In Key to the Plants in Bulgaria; Delipavlov, D., Cheschmedzhiev, I., Eds.; Agrarian University Academic Pres: Plovdiv, Bulgaria, 2003; pp. 456–457.
  10. Petrova, A.; Vladimirov, V. Balkan endemics in the Bulgarian flora. Phytol. Balc. 2010, 16, 293–311.
  11. Assyov, B.; Petrova, A. Conspectus of the Bulgarian Vascular Flora, 4th ed.; Distribution Maps and Floristic Elements; Bulgarian Biodiversity Foundation: Sofia, Bulgaria, 2012; pp. 156–157.
  12. Pulević, V. Two new species of the genus Crocus L. from Yugoslavia. Glas. Republičkog Zavoda Zaštitu Prir. Prir. Zbirke Titogr. 1976, 9, 39–43.
  13. Mathew, B. The Crocus, a Revision of the Genus Crocus; BT Batsford Ltd.: London, UK, 1982; p. 127.
  14. WCSP. World Checklist of Selected Plant Families. Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. 2021. Available online: http://wcsp.science.kew.org/ (accessed on 4 January 2021).
  15. Pavletić, Z.; Trinajstić, I. Prilog poznavanju horologije taksona Crocus weldenii Hoppe et Fürnrohr u srednjoj Dalmaciji. Acta Bot. Croat. 1979, 38, 163–166.
  16. Pulević, V. Prilog taksonomiji i horologiji nekih vrsta roda Crocus L. iz Jugoslavije (C. weldenii, C. alexandri i C. adamii sens. lat.). Glas. Republičkog Zavoda Zaštitu Prir. Prir. Zbirke Titogr. 1977, 10, 81–99.
  17. Ranđelović, N.; Hill, D.A.; Ranđelović, V. The Genus Crocus L. in Serbia; The Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts: Belgrade, Serbia, 1990; p. 49.
  18. Rakaj, M. Floristic and chorological news from north Albania. Bot. Serbica 2009, 33, 177–183.
  19. Ranđelović, N.; Sekovski, Ž.; Dimeska, G. Systematic, chorological and genetic research into the genus Crocus L. in Macedonia. In Collection of Papers Devoted to Academician Kiril Micevski; Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje: Skopje, North Macedonia, 2007; pp. 98–131.
  20. Brighton, C.A.; Mathew, B.; Marchant, C. Chromosome counts in the genus Crocus (Iridaceae). Kew Bull. 1973, 28, 451–464.
  21. Goldblatt, P.; Takei, M. Chromosome cytology of Iridaceae, patterns of variation, determination of ancestral base numbers, and modes of karyotype change. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 1997, 84, 285–304.
  22. Schneider, I.; Kerndorff, H.; Pasche, E. Chromosome numbers of Turkish Crocus (Liliiflorae, Iridaceae) and their geographical distribution. Feddes Repert. 2012, 123, 73–79.
  23. Harpke, D.; Peruzzi, L.; Kerndorff, H.; Karamplianis, T.; Constantinidis, T.; Ranđelović, V.; Ranđelović, N.; Jušković, M.; Pasche, E.; Blattner, F.R. Phylogeny, geographic distribution and new taxonomic circumscription of the Crocus reticulatus species group (Iridaceae). Turk. J. Bot. 2014, 38, 1182–1198.
  24. Harpke, D.; Kerndorff, H.; Pasche, E.; Peruzzi, L. Neotypification of the name Crocus biflorus Mill. (Iridaceae) and its consequences in the taxonomy of the genus. Phytotaxa 2016, 260, 131–143.
  25. Mosolygó, Á.; Sramkó, G.; Barabás, S.; Czeglédi, L.; Jávor, A.; Molnár, A.; Surányi, G. Molecular genetic evidence for allotetraploid hybrid speciation in the genus Crocus L. (Iridaceae). Phytotaxa 2016, 258, 121–136.
  26. NCBI GenBank Nucleotide Database. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/ (accessed on 10 January 2022).
  27. Yüzbaşioğlu, S.; Aslan, S.; Özhatay, N. Crocus thracicus (Iridaceae), a new species from north-western Turkey. Phytotaxa 2015, 197, 207–214.
More
This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!
Video Production Service