Digitalization of CSR during the COVID-19 Pandemic: History
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Subjects: Business
Contributor:

The COVID-19 pandemic has become a global problem since first appearing in 2020. Not only does it heavily affect the health sector, but it also spreads to other sectors such as social, economic, and education. Studies have shown that many global companies, including those based in Indonesia, contribute to the global pandemic mitigation by implementing Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) programs. So far, the implementation of CSR is mainly focused on providing food, medicines, and vitamins, as well as medical facilities and equipment. On the other hand, other reviewed studies showed that the pandemic has transformed the CSR implementation from offline to online, also known as CSR digitalization. The limitation in mobility and strict social distancing rules by the government have resulted in this emergence of CSR digitalization initiatives.

  • CSR digitalization
  • COVID-19
  • challenge
  • opportunity
  • Indonesia

1. Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic has created a disturbance in their global society in a way that has never happened before. The vast impact of this pandemic has potentially changed their society’s viewpoint, way of thinking, and livelihoods (He and Harris 2020). Most people and communities were impacted and are experiencing increased anxiety, stress, and panic (e.g., in a consumer society a phenomenon of ‘panic buying’ is identified (Anderson and Bedford 2020; Depoux et al. 2020; Saleh and Mujahiddin 2020)). This situation has affected people’s physical and mental well-being and economic stability and created immeasurable risks for global health and the economy (Bretscher et al. 2020).
According to the Worldometer website, as of 21 January 2021 COVID-19 has infected 97.2 million people globally with 71.8% (69.8 million) recovered, and 2.1% (2.1 million) died (Arnani 2021). During the same time in Indonesia, the Indonesian COVID-19 Response Acceleration Task Force (Satgas COVID-19) has recorded over 951,651 cases with 81.2% recovered and 2.8% died (Aziz 2021). The survey conducted by the Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI) between 24 April and 2 May 2020 reported that the pandemic led to the dismissal of over 15.6% of Indonesians from their jobs; 13.8% without severance pay. Most of these laid-off workers were young people (i.e., 15–24 years old). Several of the worst-affected sectors that need special attention were construction (29.3%), trading, restaurant, and services (28.9%), as well as transportation, warehousing, and communication (26.4%) (Meilianna and Purba 2020).
Governments made several interventions worldwide to mitigate the pandemic impact by suppressing the curve of COVID-19 cases (Shammi et al. 2020). Efforts were taken to improve the currently overwhelmed healthcare system. Nevertheless, new cases kept emerging and the worldwide exposure has also increased (McKibbin and Fernando 2020). This situation has escalated into social conflict, since there was a limited supply of basic needs (e.g., food), increased commodity prices, and the loss of jobs (Tayo et al. 2021).
Various elements of their society have also participated in mitigating this pandemic, including within the private sector through companies’ corporate social responsibility (CSR). Several companies in the US performed their CSR programs based on health, economic, and social needs emerging from the pandemic (Aguinis et al. 2020). In the UK, most large companies concentrated on pandemic mitigation through donations and philanthropic works (He and Harris 2020). In Arabic countries, the employees’ security and safety during work were guaranteed by equipping them with protective COVID-19 gear (Al-nawafah et al. 2020). A lot of the world’s best companies helped with coping with the pandemic crisis by reducing their employees’ workload without reducing their rights, offering relief to their consumers, hosting business virtual-based activities, and donating equipment for COVID-19 relief and consumable products, as well as manufacturing medical equipment to be donated (Marom and Lussier 2020).
In Indonesia, the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the health aspect of its society and hindered the national economy. However, the participation rate of Indonesian companies in CSR has also increased. For instance, there was a significant increase in participants in the TOP CSR Award 2020 event this year (120 finalists out of 200 companies) compared with last year (72 finalists out of 150 companies). The TopBusiness magazine initiated this event with the National Committee on Governance Policy (KNKG) and several CSR associations, businesses, and GCG, CSR consultant companies, and other nationally well-known businesses. The 2020 CSR Awards theme was the CSR strategic role in the national economic recovery in the new normal era (Ajang Bergengsi Top CSR 2020).
In Indonesia, state-owned enterprises (BUMN) and private companies alike, from online-based transportation, household product manufacturers, property developers, logistic deliveries, pharmaceuticals, and foreign companies are involved in mitigating the pandemic by providing logistics such as food, medicines and vitamins, and medical equipment and gear (e.g., masks, gloves, ventilators, protective gear, etc.,) (Lukman et al. 2019). Some companies, such as a few BUMN and private companies, help in alleviating the economic impact of COVID-19 through empowerment programs and digital business training designated for societies and small-scale business owners (Arifin et al. 2020).
Studies have shown that companies tend to get involved in mitigating the health impact more than the economic impact. However, CSR oriented in solving economic impact has a higher acceptance by society, since there are still limited companies working on this. Besides, the pandemic has changed consumer purchasing behavior from offline to online; thus, this condition can favor micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSME), who market their product digitally (Ibn-Mohammed et al. 2021). The CSR digitalization implementation will impact the MSME and companies, since society depends more on technology post-pandemic. Therefore, digitally oriented CSR will be more beneficial to society in the long run.
The COVID-19 pandemic is a momentum for companies to push the Indonesian digital economy through CSR digitalization. CSR digitalization is a method companies use to equip their CSR activity or programs with digital technology (Parente 2020). The pandemic has triggered a transformation wave from conventional businesses to online businesses. This is an exciting opportunity for Indonesia and other developing countries to increase their competitiveness. A report by McKinsey mentioned that the shift in the trading industry to the digital market will increase the economic growth up to USD 150 billion in 2025 (Das et al. 2016). The situation mentioned above challenges the improvement of the Indonesian digital-based economy, since the employment rate in the information and economic sector is relatively low (0.72%) and occupies the fourth lowest of the 17 main available employment areas (Badan Pusat Statistik 2020).

2. Health, Economic, and Socio-Economic Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic in the World and Indonesia

The unpredicted COVID-19 pandemic has shaken the world and currently there is no exact formula or planning on how to cope rapidly with the crisis (Pinner et al. 2020). Besides the health problems, this pandemic has disrupted the global economy, forcing the government, companies, and individuals to adjust properly (Sarkis et al. 2020; Sohrabi et al. 2020). This situation has revealed the weakness of the over-centralized global production and supply chain, which has resulted in a fragile global economy and a weak inter-industrial relationship (Bachman 2020; Sarkis et al. 2020). This situation has led to a high unemployment rate and increased food insecurity for millions of people because of the lock and restriction (Guerrieri et al. 2020).
Previous studies (Kulachinskaya et al. 2020) have explained several risks associated with this pandemic, e.g., health, economic, and social, as illustrated in Table 1. The health crisis has quickly triggered a financial crisis at the business level and a decreasing trend in the development of several industries (Bachman 2020).
Table 1. Health, economic, and social risks from the COVID-19.
Health Risks Economic Risks at the Business Level Socioeconomic Risks
Absence of a vaccine or treatment against the disease New security and cybersecurity risks for employees and customers Unemployment, loss of income, and the emergence of situations of vulnerability
Insufficient stock of sanitary material and protective equipment Operational risks due to limitation of face-to-face economic activity Massive appearance of psychological problems due to pain from the loss of loved ones or from problems associated with the new personal and work situation, feelings of loneliness
Insufficient stock of hospital areas for seriously ill patients and the absence of facilities to house mild and asymptomatic patients, unaffected elderly, and other vulnerable groups Operating costs not correlated with income Need for training and leisure activities at home due to limited mobility
Liquidity problems
Survival
These identified impacts also potentially transpire in Indonesia. The following section will explain various data and facts based on their literature study that explain the condition and situation resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic on health, economic, and social aspects in Indonesia.

2.1. Health Impact

In reality the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted individuals’ physical and psychological conditions. It has caused deaths, reductions in physical fitness, and psychological effects, e.g., post-traumatic stress, confusion, anxiety, frustration, fear of affection, insomnia, and helplessness (Brooks et al. 2020). The worst condition is the emergence of xenophobia and suicidal cases due to an intense fear of the deadly virus infection (Fitria et al. 2020).

2.2. Economic Impact

The current pandemic situation is unique, where their mobility is limited, thus disturbing their activities. Everyone is focusing on minimizing their interaction to avoid spreading this virus. To prevent COVID-19 virus from spreading, most countries closed their borders, limited their citizens’ movements, and even quarantined their citizens inside their houses for weeks. Many people felt intense pressure and lost their jobs, because the slow economic situation caused them to go bankrupt. This economic condition has never been seen since the Great Depression in the 1930s (Donthu and Gustafsson 2020).
This current situation has affected the macro-economy in countries worldwide. For example, it halted the production of various basic-need products and the export and import activity of these products (Iyengar et al. 2020). On the micro-scale, the economic impact listed was the changes in the consumers’ behavior such as panic buying (Sim et al. 2020) and focusing on buying essential basic needs since other products were scarce (Spash 2020).
In Indonesia, up to 2.6 million people have lost their jobs due to COVID-19, leading to a rise in the national unemployment rate of 9.7 million people (Fajri 2021). In 2020, the economic growth fell −5.32% in the second trimester and −3.49% in the third trimester, leading to a recession trap in 2021 (Rachbini 2021). There are over 30 million MSMEs that cannot adapt yet to use digital technology during the pandemic (Darmawan 2021). Other sectors (e.g., tourism, transportation, export, and investor interest) have also been influenced (Nasution and Muda 2020), with the stock market deviating to a negative trajectory (Devi et al. 2020).

2.3. Socio-Economic Impact

Several socio-economic activities stopped due to the pandemic: millions of people were quarantined; borders closed; schools closed; automotive industry, airlines, as well as transportation companies collapsed; trading exhibition, sports events, entertainments events canceled; millions became unemployed; international tourism locations abandoned; nationalism and protectionism appeared (Basilaia and Kvavadze 2020).
A survey-based study in 2021 (SMERU et al. 2021) identified at least five impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic experienced by Indonesian society:
  • Decrease in household income. Survey results showed that three out of four people had experienced a reduction in their income. One out of two changed their employment from formal workers to informal occupations. One out of two also did not have savings to support them, and nine out of ten family businesses were impacted.
  • Children experienced learning loss. There were 75.3% of households with children with reduced income, resulting in 2.1 million children living in poverty. Children experienced problems in learning such as limited access to a good internet connection for their remote learning (57%), and almost three out of four parents were concerned about this matter. In the health aspect, 40% of parents feared that their children would be infected and about 13% of children under the age of five were not vaccinated. Other risks were reported, e.g., almost 45% of parents experienced behavioral challenges from their children, 7% of parents had at least one child working, and 2.5% of that number already worked since the pandemic.
  • Women experienced an increase in responsibilities and chores in parenting. They had difficulties keeping the balance between household chores and other additional responsibilities of children’s remote learning.
  • Food security and vulnerable groups have to be prioritized in the future. Almost 30% of respondents worried they could not feed their families. The proportion of households with medium to severe food insecurities rose to 11.7% in 2020. Decreased income and the disturbance in the food supply system were the primary factors causing food insecurities.
In essence, the study showed that the COVID-19 pandemic affected health, economy, and social aspects. However, as a part of the world community researchers should cooperate and help minimize the virus spread by obeying health protocols established by the government. In the broader scope, society hopes that all elements, especially big companies, could help the government and mitigate the pandemic effects through its own CSR. Hopefully, through the involvement of all elements the pandemic situation will be resolved and get back to normal once again.
The COVID-19 pandemic is a momentum for the industry players to help the government in recovering the national economy, considering that the latter owns more resources in hand; however, the participation level of industry players to recover the national economy through CSR is relatively low. CSR digitalization enables the industry players to support economic recovery and national health. Industry players can give online training to empower society, especially MSMEs, and still comply with national health protocols. Society can create and market its products online with digital competencies while minimizing risky online activities.

3. An Overview of CSR in Indonesia: Before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic

3.1. CSR before the COVID-19 Pandemic

Since the pandemic began, the CSR implementation trends have changed. Before the pandemic, CSR programs relied on the companies’ missions, cultures, environments, risk profiles, and operational conditions (Akbar and Humaedi 2020). In this entry, the overview of different CSR refers to six main CSR activities as explained by Kotler and Lee (2005), e.g., cause promotions, cause related marketing, corporate social marketing, corporate philanthropy, community volunteering, and socially responsible business practices (Kotler et al. 2012). Through this, researchers will describe a trend overview of CSR before and after the pandemic.
An example of a cause promotion CSR program that aims to encourage people to donate is executed by the Danone company. Danone established a program called “one for ten”. Every purchase of one liter of their water bottle product means ten liters of water will be donated to the people in East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia (Inovasi Danone-AQUA 2019). A corporate social marketing CSR program shown by PT Unilever Indonesia, which aims to change society’s behavior for the better, launched the healthy hands program or the national campaign to wash hands with soap (Nurbaiti et al. 2020). Surabaya Patata showed a cause related marketing CSR program. They aim to donate a part of their profit to the ex-prostitution area, colloquially known as “Dolly”, in Surabaya, Indonesia (Ferdiyanti and Dyatmika 2019).
Several companies launched the corporate philanthropy CSR program. For example, one of the big telecommunication companies in Indonesia, XL Axiata, donates internet data to schools (Yasa 2017), PT Antam Tbk donates food for the flood disaster survivals in North Kolaka (GATENEWS.ID 2020), while PT Djarum gives 6000 scholarships through their program Djarum Scholarship Plus. The community volunteering CSR programs are also implemented by several companies such as PT Astra International Tbk through their Astra Employee Volunteer program, which involves their employees cleaning bus stations in Jakarta (Setiawan 2018), and PT PLN (Persero), through their Employee Volunteer Program (EVP) program, planted trees, gave training on recycling garbage, and educated students on electricity (O&G Indonesia 2015). PT Freeport Indonesia executed the socially responsible business practice CSR through their 3-R (Reuse, Reduce, and Recycle) program in all of their operational areas (Freeport Indonesia 2016) and Bukalapak company with their Paperless Program (Sujanto 2018).
Before the pandemic, several CSR programs directly helped people by building the infrastructure of social and religious facilities (Huda 2019), donating to education facilities, giving scholarships (Apriatma et al. 2019), donating to survivors of natural disasters (Ramadhan and Wijaya 2020), and others.

3.2. CSR during the COVID-19 Pandemic

The CSR trend activities changed along with the widespread impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Studies showed that companies worldwide prioritized their CSR for pandemic prevention and handling (Aguinis et al. 2020; He and Harris 2020; Marom and Lussier 2020). Besides that, the pandemic mitigation in countries with severe cases was carried out through non-pharmaceutical interventions such as travel restrictions, border closures, event cancellations, lockdowns, social distancing, school/workplace closures, and social gathering prohibitions (Chiodini 2020). Studies showed that this pandemic could be viewed as an opportunity for public and private sectors to show their commitment and participation in protecting citizens through implementing their CSR in solving problems caused by the pandemic (Al-nawafah et al. 2020).
The conditions mentioned also apply in Indonesia, where companies added CSR programs that aimed at mitigating pandemic-related health problems. Those programs helped to relieve the health, economic, and socio-economic problems. A summary of several CSR activities representing companies from different sectors, e.g., transportation, oil and gas, household production, property, electrical, pharmacy, logistic services, banking, and telecommunication is presented in the following table (Table 2). Do note that the data are only a representation of the actual data. In reality there are presumably more companies that practice their CSR activities in Indonesia.
Table 2. CSR activities from selected companies in Indonesia during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Health Mitigation Economic Mitigation Socio-Economic Mitigation
Program Company Program Company Program Company
Aid such as food, medicine and vitamins, medical tools and equipment (masks, sanitizers, gloves, ventilators, personal protective equipment, etc.)
-
GRAB
-
PT Blue Bird Tbk
-
PT. Pertamina
-
PT Chevron Pacific Indonesia (CPI)
-
WINGSGROUP
-
SINARMAS LAND
-
SINARMAS LAND
-
PT. Perusahaan Listrik Negara (PLN)
-
PT Kalbe Farma
-
PT Industri Jamu Dan Farmasi Sido Muncul Tbk
-
JNE
-
BCA
-
PT Telkom Indonesia
-
Indosat Ooredoo
-
PT XL Axiata Tbk
Training on digital business for communities and SMEs
-
PT Perusahaan Listrik Negara (PLN)
-
PT. Pertamina
-
Indosat Ooredoo
-
PT XL Axiata Tbk
-
APP Sinar Mas
-
Tokopedia
Digital literation for the society
-
GRAB
-
PT Blue Bird Tbk
-
PT. Pertamina
-
PT Chevron Pacific Indonesia (CPI)
-
WINGSGROUP
-
SINARMAS LAND
-
SINARMAS LAND
-
PT. Perusahaan Listrik Negara (PLN)
-
PT Kalbe Farma
-
PT Industri Jamu Dan Farmasi Sido Muncul Tbk
-
JNE
-
BCA
-
PT Telkom Indonesia
-
Indosat Ooredoo
-
PT XL Axiata Tbk
This condition also applies in Indonesia, where companies added CSR programs that are aimed at helping pandemic mitigation in the health sector through the donation of food, medicine, vitamins, health equipment (e.g., masks, ventilators, gloves, sanitizer), and protective gear. These companies came from various sectors: transportation such as GRAB (Triana et al. 2020) and PT Blue Bird Tbk (Gunawan 2020); oil and gas such as PT Pertamina (Muna et al. 2020) and PT Chevron Pacific Indonesia (CPI) (Lusiana 2020); household manufacturer WINGSGROUP (Triana et al. 2020); property developer SINARMAS LAND (Triana et al. 2020); electricity provider PT Perusahaan Listrik Negara (PLN) (Anggoro 2020); pharmaceutical such as PT Kalbe Farma (KALBE 2020) and PT Industri Jamu dan Farmasi Sido Muncul Tbk (Lukman et al. 2019); logistic courier JNE (Mayasari 2020); banking BCA (Ulya 2020); and telecommunication such as PT Telkom Indonesia (Santoso 2020), Indosat Ooredoo (Damar 2020), and PT XL Axiata Tbk (Wardani 2020).
Several companies have implemented CSR programs that are meant to help mitigate the economic impact of the pandemic. Such programs were digital training targeted on the society and SMEs by PT Perusahaan Listrik Negara (PLN) (Arifin et al. 2020), PT PERTAMINA (Pertamina 2020), Indosat Ooredo (Indotelko.com 2021), PT XL Axiata Tbk (Wardani 2020), PT Telkom Indonesia (Maarif 2020; Santoso 2020), APP Sinar Mas (Tribunnews.com 2021), and Tokopedia (Iskandar 2020). The program description will be explained in the following section of the CSR digitalization practices.
Industrial players realized the importance of CSR for their companies and the wider society. Besides helping the health aspect of the pandemic mitigation, CSR is also directed to help solve the economic problem by providing training on digital competence for society and increasing the digital marketing capability of MSMEs. Such competence is vital for the general public, especially those affected by the pandemic.

4. CSR Digitalization Practice during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesia

The pandemic forced us to practice social distancing to prevent the spread of the virus. As mentioned before, this pandemic has weakened the economy, since it hampered the production and distribution processes. On the other hand, the mobility restriction has accelerated the digital platform adoption process for many things (Puriwat and Tripopsakul 2020); thus, people will develop a habit in the future to maximize the use of digital media for their needs (He and Harris 2020). This situation should trigger Indonesians to adapt fast to digital technology development to increase their productivity in the future.
The contributions of companies through their CSR programs were also expanded into the Indonesian economic recovery. Those programs comprised digital business training targeted at the public, digital marketing training for MSME, and other training aimed to increase the public capacity on exploiting digital technology as a source of income during the pandemic.
There are several companies committed to this type of CSR. For instance, state-owned enterprises such as PT Perusahaan Listrik Negara (PLN) and PT PERTAMINA held digital marketing trainings for MSME (Arifin et al. 2020). Private companies such as Indosat Ooredo and PT XL Axiata Tbk also held digital competence training for the millennial generation and MSME (Wardani 2020), while PT Telkom Indonesia held training on digital literation for the public (Santoso 2020). APP Sinar Mas held digital marketplace training for MSME (Tribunnews.com 2021) and Tokopedia held MSME go digital training (Iskandar 2020).
Digital-based CSR practices by Indonesian companies mainly focused on giving digital economic competence, either for society or MSME. Such events are why digital literation is crucial for choosing, understanding, and using according to different needs (Santos and Serpa 2017). To benefit from digital technology, literation and competencies need to be improved. Digital competence can be defined as using ICT and digital media to execute tasks, solve problems, convey, organize information, collaborate, produce and share content, and develop knowledge effectively (Klassen 2019).
Digital competence training educates the public to produce digital content to support their economy (López-Meneses et al. 2020). This implies the vital skill of critically using digital technology (Klassen 2019). Digital competence covers the skill to use digital technology, either as a consumer or a content maker, in public or private life (Feng 2020). Therefore, digital literation and competence are essential to be promoted and widely introduced to society (Ramsetty and Adams 2020).
From the studies mentioned, it can be concluded that CSR digitalization practices have enabled the recipient community to become more empowered and independent. In the current pandemic situation, communities, especially MSMEs, desperately need digital competences to survive. Physical activities can be converted online by gaining digital competencies, such as executing marketing and transactions. In addition, people who work in offices can still work using digital technology. Therefore, CSR digitalization can minimize additional risks from the pandemic impact. Furthermore, CSR digitalization based on society empowerment has been considered more effective and efficient, also reducing the society’s dependency on help from companies.

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/socsci11020072

References

  1. He, Hongwei, and Lloyd Harris. 2020. The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Corporate Social Responsibility and Marketing Philosophy. Journal of Business Research 116: 176–82.
  2. Anderson, Heather, and Charlotte Bedford. 2020. What I Know Now: Radio as a Means of Empowerment for Women of Lived Prison Experience. Journal of Alternative & Community Media 2: 14–27.
  3. Depoux, Anneliese, Sam Martin, Emilie Karafillakis, Raman Preet, Annelies Wilder-Smith, and Heidi Larson. 2020. The Pandemic of Social Media Panic Travels Faster than the COVID-19 Outbreak. Journal of Travel Medicine 27: taaa031. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339669984_The_pandemic_of_social_media_panic_travels_faster_than_the_COVID-19_outbreak (accessed on 18 March 2021).
  4. Saleh, Arifin, and Mujahiddin Mujahiddin. 2020. Challenges and Opportunities for Community Empowerment Practices in Indonesia during the COVID-19 Pandemic through Strengthening the Role of Higher Education. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences 3: 1105–13.
  5. Bretscher, Lorenzo, Alex Hsu, and Andrea Tamoni. 2020. The Supply Channel of Uncertainty Shocks and the Cross-Section of Returns: Evidence From the COVID-19 Crisis. SSRN Electronic Journal. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341097410_The_Supply_Channel_of_Uncertainty_Shocks_and_the_Cross-Section_of_Returns_Evidence_From_the_COVID-19_Crisis (accessed on 5 April 2021).
  6. Arnani, Mela. 2021. Update Corona di Dunia 21 Januari 2021: 97,2 Juta Kasus, 2,08 Juta Orang Meninggal|Rekor Kasus COVID-19 Harian Dan Kematian di Portugal. Available online: https://www.kompas.com/tren/read/2021/01/21/085000165/update-corona-di-dunia-21-januari-2021--97-2-juta-kasus-2-08-juta-orang?page=all (accessed on 25 January 2021).
  7. Aziz, Abdul. 2021. Update Corona Indonesia 21 Januari: Meninggal 346, Rekor Tertinggi. Available online: https://tirto.id/update-corona-indonesia-21-januari-meninggal-346-rekor-tertinggi-f9tF (accessed on 25 January 2021).
  8. Meilianna, Ruth, and Yanti Astrelina Purba. 2020. Jurnal Kependudukan Indonesia, Edisi Khusus Demografi dan COVID-19. Dampak Pandemi COVID-19 Terhadap PHK Dan Pendapatan Pekerja Di Indonesia (the Impact of COVID-19 on Worker Layoffs and Income in Indonesia). Available online: https://ejurnal.kependudukan.lipi.go.id/index.php/jki/article/view/576/pdf (accessed on 5 March 2021).
  9. Shammi, Mashura, Md Bodrud-Doza, Abu Reza Md Towfiqul Islam, and Md Mostafizur Rahman. 2020. COVID-19 Pandemic, Socioeconomic Crisis and Human Stress in Resource-Limited Settings: A Case from Bangladesh. Heliyon 6: e04063.
  10. McKibbin, Warwick J., and Roshen Fernando. 2020. The Global Macroeconomic Impacts of COVID-19: Seven Scenarios. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339658337_The_Global_Macroeconomic_Impacts_of_COVID-19_Seven_Scenarios (accessed on 5 March 2021).
  11. Tayo, Yanti, Ninis Agustini Damayani, Atwar Bajari, and Wawan Setiawan. 2021. Health Literacy of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Behavior of Street Children’s Mothers in Indonesia. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1–14. Available online: https://www.proquest.com/openview/e01d7a04c7d0bc3b4a4bcb39f42407ae/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=54903 (accessed on 1 April 2021).
  12. Aguinis, Herman, Isabel Villamor, and Kelly P. Gabriel. 2020. Understanding Employee Responses to COVID-19: A Behavioral Corporate Social Responsibility Perspective. Management Research 18: 421–38.
  13. Al-nawafah, Salameh S., Ali K. Tawalbeh, and Ahmad. F. M. AL-Amaera. 2020. Corporate Social Responsibility of Jordanian Organizations during COVID 19 Pandemic: Hopes and Realities. Journal of Critical Review 7: 3669–81.
  14. Marom, Shaike, and Robert N. Lussier. 2020. Corporate Social Responsibility during the Coronavirus Pandemic: An Interim Overview. Business and Economic Research 10: 250.
  15. Ajang Bergengsi Top CSR. 2020. Ajang Bergengsi Top CSR Award 2020 Berlangsung Spektakuler. Available online: https://kumparan.com/kabarpaspasuruan/ajang-bergengsi-top-csr-award-2020-berlangsung-spektakuler-1tuByG6wxPN/full (accessed on 24 March 2021).
  16. Lukman, Steven Leo Naryi, Rustono Farady Marta, and Sugeng Wahjudi. 2019. Publicity of Sido Muncul Corporate Social Responsibility News Content During COVID-19 Pandemic. Concept and Communication 4: 301–16.
  17. Arifin, Miftah, Sofyan, and Wahyu Mahaputra. 2020. Kelompok Sahabat Difabel Jepara Di Masa Pandemi COVID-19 Melalui Program CSR. Jurnal Pengabdian Kesehatan 3: 165–78.
  18. Ibn-Mohammed, Taofeeq, K. B. Mustapha, J. Godsell, Z. Adamu, K. A. Babatunde, D. D. Akintade, Adolf Acquaye, H. Fujii, M. M. Ndiaye, F. A. Yamoah, and et al. 2021. A Critical Review of the Impacts of COVID-19 on the Global Economy and Ecosystems and Opportunities for Circular Economy Strategies. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 164: 105169.
  19. Parente, Roberto. 2020. Digitalization, Consumer Social Responsibility, and Humane Entrepreneurship: Good News from the Future? Journal of the International Council for Small Business 1: 56–63.
  20. Das, Kaushik, Michael Gryseels, Priyanka Sudhir, and K. T. Tan. 2016. Unlocking Indonesia’s Digital Opportunity. Jakarta: McKinsey & Company. Available online: https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Locations/Asia/Indonesia/Our Insights/Unlocking Indonesias digital opportunity/Unlocking_Indonesias_digital_opportunity.ashx (accessed on 18 March 2021).
  21. Badan Pusat Statistik. 2020. Berita Resmi Statistik: Keadaan Ketenagakerjaan Indonesia Februari 2020; Central Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik.
  22. Pinner, Dickon, Matt Rogers, and Hamid Samandari. 2020. McKinsey Quarterly: Addressing Climate Change in a Post-Pandemic World. Available online: https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/sustainability/our-insights/addressing-climate-change-in-a-post-pandemic-world# (accessed on 23 March 2021).
  23. Sarkis, Joseph, Maurie J. Cohen, Paul Dewick, and Patrick Schröder. 2020. A Brave New World: Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic for Transitioning to Sustainable Supply and Production. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 159. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7164912/ (accessed on 5 April 2021).
  24. Sohrabi, Catrin, Zaid Alsafi, Niamh O’neill, Mehdi Khan, Ahmed Kerwan, Ahmed Al-Jabir, Christos Iosifidis, and Riaz Agha. 2020. World Health Organization Declares Global Emergency: A Review of the 2019 Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19). International Journal of Surgery 79: 163–4.
  25. Bachman, Daniel. 2020. The Economic Impact of COVID-19 (Novel Coronavirus). Available online: https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/economy/covid-19/economic-impact-covid-19.html (accessed on 5 April 2021).
  26. Guerrieri, Veronica, Guido Lorenzoni, Ludwig Straub, and Iván Werning. 2020. Macroeconomic Implications of COVID-19: Can Negative Supply Shocks Cause Demand Shortages? National Bureau of Economic Research. Available online: https://www.nber.org/papers/w26918 (accessed on 23 March 2021).
  27. Kulachinskaya, Anastasia, Irina G. Akhmetova, Varvara Y. Kulkova, and Svetlana B. Ilyashenko. 2020. The Challenge of the Energy Sector of Russia during the 2020 COVID-19 Pandemic through the Example of the Republic of Tatarstan: Discussion on the Change of Open Innovation in the Energy Sector. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 6: 60.
  28. Brooks, Samantha K., Rebecca K. Webster, Louise E. Smith, Lisa Woodland, Simon Wessely, Neil Greenberg, and Gideon James Rubin. 2020. The Psychological Impact of Quarantine and How to Reduce It: Rapid Review of the Evidence. The Lancet 395: 912–20.
  29. Fitria, Linda, Neviyarni, Netrawati, and Yeni Karneli. 2020. Cognitive Behavior Therapy Counseling Untuk Mengatasi Anxiety Dalam Masa Pandemi COVID-19. Al-Irsyad: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling 10: 23–9.
  30. Donthu, Naveen, and Anders Gustafsson. 2020. Effects of COVID-19 on Business and Research. Journal of Business Research 117: 284–89.
  31. Iyengar, Karthikeyan, Shashi Bahl, Raju Vaishya, and Abhishek Vaish. 2020. Challenges and Solutions in Meeting up the Urgent Requirement of Ventilators for COVID-19 Patients. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews 14: 499–501.
  32. Sim, Kang, Hong Choon Chua, Eduard Vieta, and George Fernandez. 2020. The Anatomy of Panic Buying Related to the Current COVID-19 Pandemic. Psychiatry Research 288: 113015.
  33. Spash, Clive L. 2020. ‘The Economy’ as If People Mattered: Revisiting Critiques of Economic Growth in a Time of Crisis. Globalizations 18: 1087–104.
  34. Fajri, Rahmat. 2021. Menaker: Pengangguran Di Indonesia Naik 2,6 Juta Akibat COVID-19. Available online: https://www.antaranews.com/berita/1940076/menaker-pengangguran-di-indonesia-naik-26-juta-akibat-covid-19 (accessed on 1 February 2021).
  35. Rachbini, Didik J. 2021. Tiada Pemulihan Ekonomi, Tanpa Mengatasi Pandemi. Available online: https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20210107132706-4-214173/tiada-pemulihan-ekonomi-tanpa-mengatasi-pandemi (accessed on 1 February 2021).
  36. Darmawan, Erlangga Satya. 2021. Hadapi Pandemi, Pelaku UMKM Perlu Cermat Baca Situasi. Available online: https://money.kompas.com/read/2021/01/15/090400226/hadapi-pandemi-pelaku-umkm-perlu-cermat-baca-situasi (accessed on 18 March 2021).
  37. Nasution, Dito Aditia Darma, and Iskandar Muda. 2020. Dampak Pandemi COVID-19 Terhadap Perekonomian Indonesia. Jurnal Benefita 5: 14.
  38. Devi, Sunitha, Ni Made Sindy Warasniasih, and Putu Riesty Masdiantini. 2020. The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on the Financial Performance of Firms on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Journal of Economics, Business, & Accountancy Ventura 23: 226–42.
  39. Basilaia, Giorgi, and David Kvavadze. 2020. Transition to Online Education in Schools during a SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic in Georgia. Pedagogical Research 5. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340560537_Transition_to_Online_Education_in_Schools_during_a_SARS-CoV-2_Coronavirus_COVID-19_Pandemic_in_Georgia (accessed on 5 April 2021).
  40. SMERU, PROSPERA, UNDP, and UNICEF. 2021. The Social and Economic Impacts of COVID-19 on Households and Strategic Policy Recommendations for Indonesia. Available online: https://smeru.or.id/sites/default/files/events/presentation_-_socioeconomic_impact_of_covid19_on_households.pdf (accessed on 1 April 2021).
  41. Akbar, Umar Rizqon, and Sahadi Humaedi. 2020. Peran Csr Dalam Upaya Mengatasi Pandemi COVID-19. Prosiding Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat 7: 341.
  42. Kotler, Philip, and Nancy Lee. 2005. Corporate Social Responsibility: Doing the Most Good for Your Company and Your Cause. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  43. Kotler, Philip, David Hessekiel, and Nancy R. Lee. 2012. Good Works! Marketing and Corporate Initiatives that Build a Better World and The Bottom Line. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  44. Inovasi Danone-AQUA. 2019. Inovasi Danone-AQUA Bersama Water.Org Sukses Alirkan Air Bersih Ke Lebih Dari 54.000 Masyarakat Indonesia. Available online: https://aqua.co.id/inovasi-danone-aqua-bersama-waterorg-sukses-alirkan-air-bersih-ke-lebih-dari-54000-masyarakat-indonesia (accessed on 1 April 2021).
  45. Nurbaiti, Aida, Intania Ihsani, Santoso Tri Raharjo, and Sahadi Humaedi. 2020. Perilaku Hidup Bersih Dan Sehat Melalui Program Berbagi Sehat Oleh Pt Unilever. Prosiding Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat 6: 238.
  46. Ferdiyanti, Dwita Sari Tunas, and Sutama Wisnu Dyatmika. 2019. Majalah Ekonomi _ ISSN No. 1411-9501 _Vol. XXIV No. 1_Juli 2019 Dwita Sari Tunas Ferdiyanti & Sutama Wisnu Dyatmika. Majalah Ekonomi 24: 108–18.
  47. Yasa, Agne. 2017. XL Axiata Luncurkan Gerakan Donasi Kuota. Available online: https://teknologi.bisnis.com/read/20170829/101/685173/xl-axiata-luncurkan-gerakan-donasi-kuota (accessed on 1 April 2021).
  48. GATENEWS.ID. 2020. Bantu Korban Banjir Kolut, Antam Kirim 350 Paket Sembako. Available online: https://sultra.siberindo.co/21/12/2020/bantu-korban-banjir-kolut-antam-kirim-350-paket-sembako/ (accessed on 1 April 2021).
  49. Setiawan, Wawan. 2018. Karyawan Astra Bersihkan Halte “The Best Employee Volunteering”. Available online: https://mix.co.id/mix-award/karyawan-astra-bersihkan-halte-the-best-employee-volunteering/ (accessed on 1 April 2021).
  50. O&G Indonesia. 2015. Employee Volunteer Program, Gebrakan CSR PLN Disjaya. Available online: https://www.ogindonesia.com/search/max-results=7?q=Employee+Volunteer+Program%2C+Gebrakan+CSR+PLN+Disjaya (accessed on 1 April 2021).
  51. Freeport Indonesia. 2016. Ajak Sadar Lingkungan Sejak Usia Dini. Available online: https://ptfi.co.id/id/news/detail/nurturing-environmental-awareness-from-childhood (accessed on 1 April 2021).
  52. Sujanto, Raditia Yudistira. 2018. CSR Internal Manajemen Bukalapak Sebagai Bentuk Investasi Sosial Dan Peningkatan Kualitas Komunikasi Sosial Internal Perusahaan. Komunikatif 6: 149–64.
  53. Huda, Muhammad Miftahul. 2019. Implementasi CSR Perusahaan MIGAS Dalam Pelayanan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Di Tuban (Study Implementasi CSR Joint Operating Body Pertamina Petrochina East Java). Asketik 3: 77–90.
  54. Apriatma, Gigih, Charoline Cheisviyanny, and Salma Taqwa. 2019. Analisis Pemanfaatan Dana Corporate Social Responsibility Bagi Penerima Beasiswa Bank Nagari. Jurnal Eksplorasi Akuntansi 1: 334–48.
  55. Ramadhan, V., and S. Wijaya. 2020. Alternatif Sumbangan Penanggulangan Bencana Sebagai Pengurang Penghasilan Bruto (Studi Kasus Gempa Lombok). Jurnal Pajak dan Keuangan Negara 2: 46–56.
  56. Chiodini, Jane. 2020. COVID-19 and the Impact on Travel Health Advice. Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease 36: 101824.
  57. Triana, Annisya, Sri Sulastri, and Sahadi Humaedi. 2020. Ragam Praktik Csr Selama Pandemi COVID-19. Prosiding Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat 7: 435.
  58. Gunawan, Indra. 2020. Bentuk Dukungan Bluebird Melawan COVID-19. Available online: https://upperline.id/post/bentuk-dukungan-bluebird-melawan-covid-19 (accessed on 1 April 2021).
  59. Muna, Choirul, Mudhofir Yusuf Saifulloh, and Fajar Sodik. 2020. Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Di Masa Pandemi COVID-19 Oleh PT. Pertamina (Persero) RU II Sungai Pakning. Empower: Jurnal Pengembangan Masyarakat Islam 5: 57.
  60. Lusiana, Vera. 2020. Atasi COVID-19, Chevron Akan Sumbang Masker N95 Dan APD Bagi Riau. Available online: https://riau.antaranews.com/berita/151482/atasi-covid-19-chevron-akan-sumbang-masker-n95-dan-apd-bagi-riau (accessed on 1 April 2021).
  61. Anggoro, F. B. 2020. PLN Salurkan 2.437 Sembako Untuk Warga Riau-Kepri Terdampak Pandemi. Available online: https://www.antaranews.com/berita/1500744/pln-salurkan-2437-sembako-untuk-warga-riau-kepri-terdampak-pandemi (accessed on 5 April 2021).
  62. KALBE. 2020. KALBE Siapkan Rp. 25 Miliar Untuk Bantuan Hadapi Virus Korona (COVID-19). Available online: https://www.kalbe.co.id/id/KEBERLANJUTAN/sustainability-CSR/ArtMID/1111/ArticleID/919/KALBE-SIAPKAN-Rp-25-MILIAR-UNTUK-BANTUAN-HADAPI-VIRUS-KORONA-COVID-19 (accessed on 5 April 2021).
  63. Mayasari, Silvina. 2020. Mplementasi Corporate Social Responsibility pt tiki Jalur Nugraha Ekakurir (JNE) Dalam Penanganan Wabah Virus Corona Di Indonesia. Jurnal Akrab Juara 5: 268–82.
  64. Ulya, Fika Nurul. 2020. BCA Donasi Rp 1 Miliar Ke 81 Puskesmas Di Jawa Timur. Available online: https://money.kompas.com/read/2020/09/04/080800626/bca-donasi-rp-1-miliar-ke-81-puskesmas-di-jawa-timur (accessed on 1 April 2021).
  65. Santoso, Agil Hari. 2020. Telkom Serahkan Bantuan Ratusan APD Dan Hand Sanitizer, Bantu Cegah Virus Corona Di Jawa Barat. Available online: https://www.pikiran-rakyat.com/jawa-barat/pr-01357537/telkom-serahkan-bantuan-ratusan-apd-dan-hand-sanitizer-bantu-cegah-virus-corona-di-jawa-barat?page=2 (accessed on 5 April 2021).
  66. Damar, Agustinus Mario. 2020. Indosat Ooredoo Sumbang 3.000 Pakaian Hazmat Untuk Petugas Medis COVID-19. Available online: https://www.liputan6.com/ramadan/read/4265118/indosat-ooredoo-sumbang-3000-pakaian-hazmat-untuk-petugas-medis-covid-19 (accessed on 5 April 2021).
  67. Wardani, Agustin Setyo. 2020. XL Axiata Rilis Kelas Inkubasi Sispreneur Untuk Perempuan Pelaku UMKM. Available online: https://www.liputan6.com/tekno/read/4329349/xl-axiata-rilis-kelas-inkubasi-sispreneur-untuk-perempuan-pelaku-umkm (accessed on 5 April 2021).
  68. Pertamina. 2020. Gairahkan UMKM Di Masa Pandemi COVID-19, Pertamina Gelar Pelatihan Online Digital Marketing. Available online: https://pertamina.com/id/news-room/news-release/gairahkan-umkm-di-masa-pandemi-covid-19-pertamina-gelar-pelatihan-online-digital-marketing (accessed on 1 April 2021).
  69. Indotelko.com. 2021. UNDP Dan Indosat Ooredoo Siap Lawan COVID-19. Available online: https://www.indotelko.com/read/1617237031/undp-indosat-covid-19 (accessed on 5 April 2021).
  70. Maarif, Nurcholis. 2020. Peran Telkom Atasi COVID-19: Sediakan Layanan Digital-Berdayakan UMKM. Available online: https://inet.detik.com/telecommunication/d-5015163/peran-telkom-atasi-covid-19-sediakan-layanan-digital-berdayakan-umkm (accessed on 5 March 2021).
  71. Tribunnews.com. 2021. Pelatihan Digital Marketplace Bagi Binaan APP Sinar Mas Tingkatkan Perekonomian UKM Lokal. Available online: https://www.tribunnews.com/regional/2021/01/28/pelatihan-digital-marketplace-bagi-binaan-app-sinar-mas-tingkatkan-perekonomian-ukm-lokal?page=3 (accessed on 1 April 2021).
  72. Iskandar. 2020. Tokopedia Dan Kemkominfo Gelar Pelatihan UMKM Go Digital. Available online: https://www.liputan6.com/tekno/read/4386452/tokopedia-dan-kemkominfo-gelar-pelatihan-umkm-go-digital (accessed on 2 April 2021).
  73. Puriwat, Wilert, and Suchart Tripopsakul. 2020. An Investigation of the Effects of Digital Social Responsibility on Corporate Image, EWOM, and Brand Loyalty during the COVID-19 Social Distancing Phenomenon. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change 13: 416–34.
  74. Santos, Ana Isabel, and Sandro Serpa. 2017. The Importance of Promoting Digital Literacy in Higher Education. International Journal of Social Science Studies 5: 90.
  75. Klassen, Amanda. 2019. Deconstructing Paper-Lined Cubicles: Digital Literacy and Information Technology Resources in the Workplace. International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning (iJAC) 12: 5.
  76. López-Meneses, Eloy, Fabrizio Manuel Sirignano, Esteban Vázquez-Cano, and José M. Ramírez-Hurtado. 2020. University Students’ Digital Competence in Three Areas of the DigCom 2.1 Model: A Comparative Study at Three European Universities. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 36: 69–88.
  77. Feng, Haoda. 2020. Digital Technologies: Sustainable Innovations for Improving Teaching and Learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 57: 506–8.
  78. Ramsetty, Anita, and Cristin Adams. 2020. Impact of the Digital Divide in the Age of COVID-19. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 27: 1147–48.
More
This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!
Video Production Service