Multidimensional Aspect of Corporate Entrepreneurship in Family Business: History
View Latest Version
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Subjects: Business
Contributor:
Arif Imam Suroso

Corporate entrepreneurship (CE) research in family businesses or SMEs is sparse in Scopus-indexed journals. In this study, a thorough discussion is presented that touches on actors, variables consisting of behaviors and activities, and outcomes in the form of financial and non-financial performance. 

  • corporate entrepreneurship
  • family business
  • small and medium enterprise
  • structured literature review
  • bibliometric analysis
  • entrepreneurial orientation
  • firm performance

1. Introduction

The innovation process consists of developing new products, services, processes, and business model innovations.

The strategy formulation process consists of internal and external strategies for the sustainable regeneration and renewal of the company.

Corporate entrepreneurship (CE) is essential for a family business for its long-term durability (Eddleston et al. 2012), and it is significant for the entrepreneurial spirit of an individual manager in exploring all opportunities and business ideas (Hornsby et al. 2009). Most researchers state that managers from family groups have high motivation to advance the company, and non-family managers are associated with two categories: motivation and behavior (Kotlar and Sieger 2019). The knowledge and expertise of a manager are not always available in family businesses because the family members or the owner will recruit several managers from outside as talent (Gedajlovic et al. 2004). Research on CE in family businesses involves both internal and external managers or top management teams (TMT).

Family firms can be divided into three elements, i.e., ownership, control, and management, which can have positive or negative consequences for the company (Villalonga and Amit 2006). In terms of ownership, this may be direct for a shareholder of a company or both direct and indirect control for the appointed management of a company or a board of directors (Gonzalez et al. 2019). The director, chairman, or CEO is the highest-ranking leader in the company, and their title depends on the level of the company and the size of the company. Family companies or SMEs are usually led by a director from the family or from outside.

2. Development and Findings

Geographical analysis of published articles considers the distribution of published articles by country and the relative citations by country ( Figure 1 ). The criteria included in VOSviewer are a minimum number of four articles and four citations in one country. In this analysis, there are eight countries with the highest number of articles, the United States with eleven articles, and the UK with seven articles. The highest number of citations came from the USA, with 328 citations, and the second highest was from Germany, with 193 citations. For Asian countries, the most articles were from Malaysia, with 5 articles with 46 citations, and Iran, with 5 articles with 28 citations.

Economies 09 00156 g002
Figure 1. Documents and citations of selected countries (VOSviewer elaboration).

The following analysis considered the publication sources of several articles in the study, with the criteria of a minimum number of two articles and two citations for each source ( Figure 2 ). The data indicated that the most prevalent sources were Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice , the Journal of Management Studies , and the International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal , with as many as three articles. The highest number of citations was generated by Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice , with 172 citations, followed by the Journal of International Entrepreneurship , with 82 citations, and the International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal , with 54 citations.

Economies 09 00156 g003
Figure 2. Documents and citations of selected sources (VOSviewer elaboration).

Article analysis was concluded by dividing the articles based on the actors (first column), attributes (second column), and outcomes (third column). The analysis of all articles is presented in Table 1 .

Table 1. Corporate entrepreneurship variables.
Actors Attributes Outcomes
Chairman/CEO/Director: 11 articles (Ling et al. 2008; Cucculelli and Bettinelli 2015; Naldi et al. 2015; Calabrò et al. 2016; Chen and Nadkarni 2017; Hughes and Mustafa 2017; García-Sánchez et al. 2018; Riviezzo and Garofano 2018; Rehman et al. 2020; Saleem et al. 2020; De Massis et al. 2021)
Employees/Staff: 12 articles (Ripollés-Meliá et al. 2007; Toledano et al. 2010; Kuye et al. 2012; Bojica et al. 2017; Chienwattanasook et al. 2019; Aeknarajindawat 2020; Liu et al. 2020; Najmulmunir 2020; Noerhartati et al. 2020; Rehman et al. 2020; Ziyae and Sadeghi 2020; Raitis et al. 2021)
Manager/TMT: 19 articles (Hancer et al. 2009; Schmelter et al. 2010; Van Wyk and Adonisi 2012; Mustafa et al. 2013; Leal-Rodríguez et al. 2017; Martín-Rojas et al. 2017; Jahanshahi et al. 2018; Hosseini et al. 2018; Ndemezo and Kayitana 2018; Amberg and McGaughey 2019; Boukamcha 2019; Kotlar and Sieger 2019; Lee et al. 2019; Soliman 2019; Akbari et al. 2020; Garrett et al. 2020; Sakhdari et al. 2020; De Massis et al. 2021; Soares et al. 2021)
Family Members/Owner: 6 articles (Marchisio et al. 2010; Hughes and Mustafa 2017; Fu and Si 2018; Franco and Piceti 2020; Saleem et al. 2020; Fang et al. 2021)		 CE activities such as venturing, innovation and strategic renewal: 12 articles (Toledano et al. 2010; Cucculelli and Bettinelli 2015; Calabrò et al. 2016; Hughes and Mustafa 2017; Leal-Rodríguez et al. 2017; Martín-Rojas et al. 2017; Kotlar and Sieger 2019; Lee et al. 2019; Soliman 2019; Garrett et al. 2020; Sakhdari et al. 2020; De Massis et al. 2021)
Company factors of CE such as management support, work discretion, reward/reinforcement, time availability, and organization boundaries: 6 articles (Kuye et al. 2012; Mustafa 2015; Chienwattanasook et al. 2019; Akbari et al. 2020; Najmulmunir 2020; Noerhartati et al. 2020)
Entrepreneur orientation such as risk taking, innovativeness, proactiveness, aggressiveness, and autonomy: 8 articles (Hancer et al. 2009; Toledano et al. 2010; Eddleston et al. 2012; Riviezzo and Garofano 2018; Liu et al. 2020; Rehman et al. 2020; Ziyae and Sadeghi 2020; Fang et al. 2021)
Personnel and family concern such as owner gender, education, experience, knowledge, transformational CEOs influence, TMTs’ behavioral integration, age, and tenure: 8 articles (Saleem et al. 2020; Ling et al. 2008; Chen and Nadkarni 2017; Fu and Si 2018; Ndemezo and Kayitana 2018; Riviezzo and Garofano 2018; Bui et al. 2020; Thomas et al. 2020)
Human resource concerns, such as employee satisfaction, organization commitment, motivation, cultural intelligence, tolerance of ambiguity, CEO style, high-performance human resources, organizational culture, and education: 8 articles (Mustafa et al. 2013; Soleimani and Shahnazari 2013; Naldi et al. 2015; Afshar Jahanshahi et al. 2018; Fayçal Boukamcha 2019; Aeknarajindawat 2020; Franco and Piceti 2020; Soares et al. 2021)
Internal organizational factors, such as market orientation, flexibility and job satisfaction, different management functions, and work value: 3 articles (Van Wyk and Adonisi 2012; Hosseini et al. 2018; Raitis et al. 2021)
Company support, such as IT integration, technological skill, and fire safety: 5 articles (Schmelter et al. 2010; García-Sánchez et al. 2018; Amberg and McGaughey 2019; Nabeel-Rehman and Nazri 2019; Rehman et al. 2020)		 Financial performance such as ROA, ROE, sales growth, net profit, and sales growth: 9 articles (Marchisio et al. 2010; Toledano et al. 2010; Naldi et al. 2015; Bojica et al. 2017; Leal-Rodríguez et al. 2017; Fu and Si 2018; Rehman et al. 2020; Sakhdari et al. 2020; Fang et al. 2021)
Organization and company performance such as exploitation of new resources, resources new market, creating new business/service/product, competitive advantage, intangible: 16 articles (Eddleston et al. 2012; Cucculelli and Bettinelli 2015; Martín-Rojas et al. 2017; García-Sánchez et al. 2018; Riviezzo and Garofano 2018; Amberg and McGaughey 2019; Boukamcha 2019; Chienwattanasook et al. 2019; Lee et al. 2019; Nabeel-Rehman and Nazri 2019; Soliman 2019; Akbari et al. 2020; Franco and Piceti 2020; Thomas et al. 2020; Ziyae and Sadeghi 2020; De Massis et al. 2021)
Family value such as family business tradition, family business sustainability: 3 articles (Soares et al. 2021; Raitis et al. 2021; Soleimani and Shahnazari 2013)
CE performance such as enhancing innovation and creativity, innovation: 13 articles (Saleem et al. 2020; Bui et al. 2020; Liu et al. 2020; Ling et al. 2008; Hancer et al. 2009; Kuye et al. 2012; Mustafa et al. 2013; Calabrò et al. 2016; Chen and Nadkarni 2017; Jahanshahi et al. 2018; Hosseini et al. 2018; Ndemezo and Kayitana 2018; Rehman et al. 2020)
CE factors such as MS, reward/compensation, WD, TA, OB 2 articles (Hughes and Mustafa 2017; Van Wyk and Adonisi 2012)
Personnel performance such as performance-based reward systems: 2 articles (Kotlar and Sieger 2019; Mustafa et al. 2013)
Supply chain performance: 2 articles (Najmulmunir 2020; Noerhartati et al. 2020)
Market performance 1 article (Garrett et al. 2020)
Entrepreneurial orientation: 1 a

3. Conclusions and Future Research

Research on CE in family businesses and small companies is still relatively rare and only focuses on large companies or large multinational companies. In the previous studies, CE research focused on large companies, multinational corporations, and particular industries. Opportunities for conducting research in CE for family businesses and SMEs are still numerous for this community of scholars and researchers. Exploring such issues through theoretical and empirical contributions in family businesses and SMEs would be a promising avenue of future research.

There are not many instances of research in which family members of the company are regarded as actors in the study. Research on family businesses could be comprehensive if there is involvement from family members and owners, and this could be considered in further research in the future. Scholars in the family business field have not explored the correlations among relatives as actors in the family business. According to these gaps, there are many topics and opportunities for future research in CE in family businesses.

Research on CE in family businesses will bring many benefits for entrepreneurs to raise the level of their companies from an established family business to a more reputable company. This SLR research contributes to further research demonstrating the potential for novelty in CE in family businesses, especially regarding entrepreneurship. 

The use of the corporate entrepreneurship keyword and the deepening of articles based on family businesses and SME were limited to journals indexed by Scopus, resulting in the possibility that many articles suitable for review were not included. Suggestions for further research include adding references from several other publication sources, especially to increase the depth of CE research from the family business side. 

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/economies9040156

References

  1. Eddleston, Kimberly A., Franz W. Kellermanns, and Thomas M. Zellweger. 2012. Exploring the Entrepreneurial Behavior of Family Firms: Does the Stewardship Perspective Explain Differences? Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 36: 347–67.
  2. Hornsby, Jeffrey S., Donald F. Kuratko, Dean A. Shepherd, and Jennifer P. Bott. 2009. Managers’ Corporate Entrepreneurial Actions: Examining Perception and Position. Journal of Business Venturing 24: 236–47.
  3. Kotlar, Josip, and Philipp Sieger. 2019. Bounded rationality and bounded reliability: A study of nonfamily managers’ entrepreneurial behavior in family firms. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 43: 251–73.
  4. Gedajlovic, Eric, Michael H. Lubatkin, and William S. Schulze. 2004. Crossing the Threshold from Founder Management to Professional Management: A Governance Perspective. Journal of Management Studies 41: 899–912.
  5. Villalonga, Belen, and Raphael Amit. 2006. How Do Family Ownership, Control and Management Affect Firm Value? Journal of Financial Economics 80: 385–417.
  6. Gonzalez, Maximiliano, Juan David Idrobo, and Rodrigo Taborda. 2019. Family Firms and Financial Performance: A Meta-Regression Analysis. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administracion 32: 345–72.
  7. Ling, Yan, Zeki Simsek, Michael H. Lubatkin, and John F. Veiga. 2008. Transformational Leadership’s Role in Promoting Corporate Entrepreneurship: Examining the Ceo-Tmt Interface. Academy of Management Journal 51: 557–76.
  8. Cucculelli, Marco, and Cristina Bettinelli. 2015. Business Models, Intangibles and Firm Performance: Evidence on Corporate Entrepreneurship from Italian Manufacturing SMEs. Small Business Economics 45: 329–50.
  9. Naldi, Lucia, Leona Achtenhagen, and Per Davidsson. 2015. International Corporate Entrepreneurship among SMEs: A Test of Stevenson’s Notion of Entrepreneurial Management. Journal of Small Business Management 53: 780–800.
  10. Calabrò, Andrea, Tommaso Minola, Giovanna Campopiano, and Thilo Pukall. 2016. Turning Innovativeness into Domestic and International Corporate Venturing: The Moderating Effect of High Family Ownership and Influence. European Journal of International Management 10: 505–33.
  11. Chen, Jianhong, and Sucheta Nadkarni. 2017. It’s about Time! CEOs’ Temporal Dispositions, Temporal Leadership, and Corporate Entrepreneurship. Administrative Science Quarterly 62: 31–66.
  12. Hughes, Mathew, and Michael Mustafa. 2017. Antecedents of Corporate Entrepreneurship in SMEs: Evidence from an Emerging Economy. Journal of Small Business Management 55: 115–40.
  13. García-Sánchez, Encarnacion, Víctor Jesús García-Morales, and Rodrigo Martín-Rojas. 2018. Analysis of the Influence of the Environment, Stakeholder Integration Capability, Absorptive Capacity, and Technological Skills on Organizational Performance through Corporate Entrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal 14: 345–77.
  14. Riviezzo, Angelo, and Antonella Garofano. 2018. Accessing External Networks: The Role of Firm’s Resources and Entrepreneurial Orientation. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business 34: 1–19.
  15. Rehman, Nabeel, Sadaf Razaq, Ammara Farooq, Nayab Mufti Zohaib, and Mohammad Nazri. 2020. Information Technology and Firm Performance: Mediation Role of Absorptive Capacity and Corporate Entrepreneurship in Manufacturing SMEs. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 32: 1049–65.
  16. Saleem, Irfan, Irfan Siddique, and Aqeel Ahmed. 2020. An Extension of the Socioemotional Wealth Perspective: Insights from an Asian Sample. Journal of Family Business Management 10: 293–312.
  17. De Massis, Alfredo, Kimberly A. Eddleston, and Paola Rovelli. 2021. Entrepreneurial by Design: How Organizational Design Affects Family and Non-Family Firms’ Opportunity Exploitation. Journal of Management Studies 58: 27–62.
  18. Ripollés-Meliá, María, Martina Menguzzato-Boulard, and Luz Sánchez-Peinado. 2007. Entrepreneurial Orientation and International Commitment. Journal of International Entrepreneurship 5: 65–83.
  19. Toledano, Nuria, David Urbano, and Marc Bernadich. 2010. Networks and corporate entrepreneurship: A comparative case study on family business in Catalonia. Journal of Organizational Change Management 23: 396–412.
  20. Kuye, O. L., B. E. A. Oghojafor, and A. A. Sulaimon. 2012. Planning Flexibility and Corporate Entrepreneurship in the Manufacturing Sector in Nigeria. International Journal of Business Excellence 5: 323–37.
  21. Bojica, Ana Maria, María del Mar Fuentes-Fuentes, and Virginia Fernández Pérez. 2017. Corporate Entrepreneurship and Codification of the Knowledge Acquired from Strategic Partners in SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management 55: 205–30.
  22. Chienwattanasook, Krisada, Samanan Wattanapongphasuk, Andi Luhur Prianto, and Kittisak Jermsittiparsert. 2019. Corporate Entrepreneurship and Business Performance of Logistic Companies in Indonesia. Industrial Engineering and Management Systems 18: 541–50.
  23. Aeknarajindawat, Natnaporn. 2020. Safety Climate Impact on the Safety Behavior in Chemical Industry of Thailand. Journal of Security and Sustainability 9: 96–107.
  24. Liu, Gordon, Ke Rong, and Wai Wai Ko. 2020. Promoting Employee Entrepreneurial Attitudes: An Investigation of Chinese State-Owned Enterprises. International Journal of Human Resource Management 31: 2695–713.
  25. Najmulmunir, Nandang. 2020. Does reward enforcement and organization boundaries lead to sustainable supply chain performance in Indonesian SMEs? A moderating role of work discretion . International Journal of Supply Chain Management 9: 129–36.
  26. Noerhartati, E., Y. Soesatyo, Cholik T. Mutohir Moedjito, and Amrozi Khamidi. 2020. Determinants of sustainable supply chain performance: The role of corporate entrepreneurship in indecision textile companies. International Journal of Supply Chain Management 9: 106–12.
  27. Ziyae, Babak, and Hossein Sadeghi. 2020. Exploring the relationship between corporate entrepreneurship and firm performance: The mediating effect of strategic entrepreneurship. Baltic Journal of Management 16: 113–33.
  28. Raitis, Johanna, Innan Sasaki, and Josip Kotlar. 2021. System-Spanning Values Work and Entrepreneurial Growth in Family Firms. Journal of Management Studies 58: 104–34.
  29. Hancer, Murat, Ahmet Bulent Ozturk, and Tugrul Ayyildiz. 2009. Middle-level hotel managers’ corporate entrepreneurial behavior and risk-taking propensities: A case of didim, Turkey. Journal of Hospitality and Leisure Marketing 18: 523–37.
  30. Schmelter, Ralf, René Mauer, Andreas Engelen, and Malte Brettel. 2010. Conjuring the Entrepreneurial Spirit in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: The Influence of Management on Corporate Entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing 2: 159–84.
  31. Van Wyk, Rene, and Mandla Adonisi. 2012. Antecedents of Corporate Entrepreneurship. South African Journal of Business Management 43: 65–78.
  32. Mustafa, Michael, John J. Richards, and Hazel Melanie Ramos. 2013. High Performance Human Resource Practices and Corporate Entrepreneurship: The Mediating Effect of Middle Managers Knowledge Collecting and Donating Behaviour. Asian Academy of Management Journal 18: 17–36.
  33. Leal-Rodríguez, Antonio L., Gema Albort-Morant, and Silvia Martelo-Landroguez. 2017. Links between Entrepreneurial Culture, Innovation, and Performance: The Moderating Role of Family Firms. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal 13: 819–35.
  34. Martín-Rojas, Rodrigo, Virginia Fernández-Pérez, and Encarnación García-Sánchez. 2017. Encouraging Organizational Performance through the Influence of Technological Distinctive Competencies on Components of Corporate Entrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal 13: 397–426.
  35. Afshar Jahanshahi, Asghar, Khaled Nawaser, and Alexander Brem. 2018. Corporate Entrepreneurship Strategy: An Analysis of Top Management Teams in SMEs. Baltic Journal of Management 13: 528–43.
  36. Hosseini, Mojtaba, Hossein Dadfar, and Staffan Brege. 2018. Firm-Level Entrepreneurship and International Performance: A Simultaneous Examination of Orientation and Action. Journal of International Entrepreneurship 16: 338–68.
  37. Ndemezo, Etienne, and Charles Kayitana. 2018. Corporate Governance, Corporate Entrepreneurship and Firm Performance: Evidence from the Rwandese Manufacturing Industry. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance 11: 103–21.
  38. Amberg, Joe J., and Sara L. McGaughey. 2019. Strategic Human Resource Management and Inertia in the Corporate Entrepreneurship of a Multinational Enterprise. International Journal of Human Resource Management 30: 759–93.
  39. Boukamcha, Fayçal. 2019. The Effect of Transformational Leadership on Corporate Entrepreneurship in Tunisian SMEs. Leadership and Organization Development Journal 40: 286–304.
  40. Lee, Kyootai, Marianna Makri, and Terri Scandura. 2019. The Effect of Psychological Ownership on Corporate Entrepreneurship: Comparisons Between Family and Nonfamily Top Management Team Members. Family Business Review 32: 10–30.
  41. Soliman, Amal Farouk. 2019. A Proposed Model for the Effect of Entrepreneurship on Total Quality Management Implementation: An Applied Study on Dairy and Juice Manufacturing Companies in Egypt. International Journal of Six Sigma and Competitive Advantage 11: 179–203.
  42. Akbari, Morteza, Kamal Sakhdari, and Mozhgan Danesh. 2020. Organizational preparedness for corporate entrepreneurship and performance in Iranian food industry. Journal of Agriculture, Science and Technology 22: 361–75. Available online: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85081019512&partnerID=40&md5=b028fdccf150dc638276033d780335d9 (accessed on 10 October 2021).
  43. Garrett, Robert, Shaunn Mattingly, Jeff Hornsby, and Alireza Aghaey. 2020. Impact of Relatedness, Uncertainty and Slack on Corporate Entrepreneurship Decisions. Management Decision 59: 1114–31.
  44. Sakhdari, Kamal, Henri Burgers, Jahangir Yadollahi Farsi, and Sasan Rostamnezhad. 2020. Shaping the Organisational Context for Corporate Entrepreneurship and Performance in Iran: The Interplay between Social Context and Performance Management. International Journal of Human Resource Management 31: 1020–46.
  45. Soares, Glauciana Gomes, Vitor Lélio da Silva Braga, Carla Susana da Encarnação Marques, and Vanessa Ratten. 2021. Corporate Entrepreneurship Education’s Impact on Family Business Sustainability: A Case Study in Brazil. International Journal of Management Education 19: 100424.
  46. Marchisio, Gaia, Pietro Mazzola, Salvatore Sciascia, Morgan Miles, and J. Astrachan. 2010. Corporate venturing in family business: The effects on the family and its members. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 22: 349–77.
  47. Fu, Ying, and Steven Si. 2018. Does a Second-Generation Returnee Make the Family Firm More Entrepreneurial?: The China Experience. Chinese Management Studies 12: 287–304.
  48. Franco, Mário, and Patricia Piceti. 2020. Family Dynamics and Gender Perspective Influencing Copreneurship Practices: A Qualitative Analysis in the Brazilian Context. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research 26: 14–33.
  49. Fang, Hanqing Chevy, Esra Memili, James J. Chrisman, and Linjia Tang. 2021. Narrow-Framing and Risk Preferences in Family and Non-Family Firms. Journal of Management Studies 58: 201–35.
  50. Mustafa, Michael. 2015. Providing Organisational Support for Corporate Entrepreneurship: Evidence from a Malaysian Family Firm. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business 25: 414–41.
  51. Bui, Hong T. M., Huong T. M. Nguyen, and Vinh Sum Chau. 2020. Strategic Agility Orientation? The Impact of CEO Duality on Corporate Entrepreneurship in Privatized Vietnamese Firms. Journal of General Management 45: 107–16.
  52. Thomas, Nobin, Angela Randolph, and Alejandra Marin. 2020. A Network View of Entrepreneurial Cognition in Corporate Entrepreneurship Contexts: A Socially Situated Approach. Management Decision 58: 1331–54.
  53. Soleimani, Maryam, and Ali Shahnazari. 2013. Studying Effective Factors on Corporate Entrepreneurship: Representing a Model. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology 5: 1309–16.
  54. Nabeel-Rehman, Rana, and Mohammad Nazri. 2019. Information technology capabilities and SMES performance: An understanding of a multimediation model for the manufacturing sector. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management 14: 253–76.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!
ScholarVision Creations
Feedback