You're using an outdated browser. Please upgrade to a modern browser for the best experience.
CXCL1 as Gene, Promoter and Regulation of Expression: History
View Latest Version
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Subjects: Allergy
Contributor: Irena Baranowska-Bosiacka

CXCL1 is one of the most important chemokines, part of a group of chemotactic cytokines involved in the development of many inflammatory diseases. It activates CXCR2 and, at high levels, CXCR1. The expression of CXCL1 is elevated in inflammatory reactions and also has important functions in physiology, including the induction of angiogenesis and recruitment of neutrophils.

  • CXCL1
  • MGSA
  • Gro-α
  • CXCR2
  • inflammation
  • cancer
  • tumor
  • chemokine
  • neutrophil

1. Introduction

Intercellular signaling is an essential part of the functioning of a multicellular organism, involving the flow of information between different cells through either direct contact or via factors secreted outside the cell: simple compounds such as lactate [1], or large structures such as extracellular vesicles [2]. One group of factors responsible for intercellular signaling is chemokines, a group of about 50 chemotactic cytokines grouped according to the conserved N-terminal cysteine motif: CXC chemokines (α-chemokines), CC chemokines (β-chemokines), C chemokines (γ-chemokines) and CX3C chemokines (δ-chemokines) [3].

2. The Name ‘CXCL1’

CXCL1 was first described in the 1980s as an auto-stimulatory melanoma mitogen, to which it owes one of its first names: melanoma growth-stimulatory activity (MGSA) [4]. Another historical name of CXCL1 is neutrophil-activating peptide-3 (NAP-3), a term associated with its ability to induce neutrophil chemotaxis [5]. In subsequent years, CXCL1 was shown to be a product of the growth-regulated gene (Gro) [6][7]. Since then, CXCL1 has functioned under two names: MGSA and growth-regulated (or -related) oncogene (GRO) [7][8][9]. In the early 1990s, two more chemokines were identified that were very similar to GRO [10]. They were named GRO-β and GRO-γ, now known as CXCL2 and CXCL3 [11]. GRO itself was given the additional symbol α (GRO-α); another variant of this name is GRO-1 [8][10]. With the discovery of more CXC chemokines, a new and more systematic nomenclature was required. For this reason, a new classification was introduced based on the chemokine sub-family name and the number of the chemokine. Thus, GRO-α was named small inducible cytokine sub-family B, member 1 (SCYB1), and then CXCL1 [11].
CXCL1 has two important motifs in its sequence. One is the CXC motif (9–11 amino acids), which assigns this chemokine to CXC chemokines (or α-chemokines) [7]. The second is the ELR motif (6–8 amino acids), also located at the N-terminus, which makes CXCL1 one of the ELR+ CXC chemokines, currently also known as CXC motif chemokine receptor 2 (CXCR2) receptor agonists [12][13].

3. CXCL1: Gene and Transcriptional Regulation

3.1. 4q12–q13 CXC Chemokine Gene Cluster

The CXCL1 gene is localized in the 4q12–q13 CXC chemokine gene cluster [11][14]. This region includes the closely located loci of other CXC sub-family chemokines, including CXCL2/GRO-β, CXCL3/GRO-γ, CXCL4/PF-4, CXC motif chemokine ligand 4 variant-1 (CXCL4L1), CXCL5/ENA-78, CXCL6/GCP-2, CXCL7/PPBP/NAP-2, and CXCL8/IL-8 [15][16][17]. It also contains the CXC motif chemokine ligand 1 pseudogene 1 (CXCL1P1) previously described as a growth-regulated oncogene δ-pseudogene (GRO-δ) [18]. Near the cluster, at 4q21, are the ligands of CXCR3 and CXCL13 [15][17]. Very often the 4q12–q13 gene cluster is amplified in cancer, particularly in Barrett neoplasia [19]. In breast cancer, 7.5% of primary tumors have a CXCL1 gene amplification. The frequency of CXCL1 amplification increases with disease progression [20]. The amplification of the CXCL1 gene is observed in 20% cases of breast cancer metastasis [20]. The duplication of the 4q12–q13 CXC chemokine gene cluster is associated with a higher incidence of cancer, and is particularly found in individuals from melanoma-prone families [21].
The sequences of the chemokine genes in the 4q12–q13 CXC chemokine gene cluster are similar and located close to each other, which suggests that these genes originated as a result of duplication [15]. In general, all CXC chemokines from this gene cluster can be divided into two groups [3], CXCL6 and CXCL8 (which, at similar concentrations, activate both CXCR1 and CXCR2 receptors), and CXCL1, CXCL2, CXCL3, CXCL5, and CXCL7 (which, at about 1 nM concentration, activate CXCR2; and at a concentration about 100 times higher, activate CXCR1) [3][22][23][24][25]. Each of the groups consists of chemokines that share the same properties and activate the same receptor at similar concentrations. Nevertheless, significant differences do occur in the action of individual chemokines, as the expression and secretion of each chemokine is sometimes separately regulated and depends on the cell type [26]. For this reason, to understand the interaction of all representatives of this gene cluster, it is necessary to understand the regulation of each CXC chemokine.
At this point, it should be noted that the ancestor of today’s mammals (cretaceous period, separation of placental mammals from marsupials) had far fewer CXC chemokine genes. These genes were duplicated, and today, this gene cluster has seven CXC chemokine genes in mice and nine in humans [15]. The opossum has only three chemokine genes, and birds have between two and three depending on the species. While the accumulation of genetic changes in individual CXC chemokine genes occurred independently of each other, duplication may have occurred multiple times at different times. Therefore, mouse lipopolysaccharide-induced CXC chemokine (LIX) is as similar to rat LIX (a different species) as the human CXCL5 is to human CXCL6 (same species/genome) [27]. Therefore, a given human CXC chemokine cannot be unambiguously assigned to a mouse or rat CXC chemokine from this cluster. While it may be that in one disease or laboratory model a given chemokine in a human or mouse/rat is upregulated, when studying a second disease the expression of the given chemokine will be upregulated only in one species [28]. For this reason, the role of human CXCL1 in a given disease cannot be compared with rat cytokine-induced neutrophil chemoattractant-1 (CINC-1) [29] or mouse keratinocyte-derived chemokine (KC) [30][31] without performing experiments on samples from human patients.
Importantly, given the arrangement of the genes on chromosomes, the human CXCL1 gene does not correspond to the murine KC gene, but to the murine dendritic cell inflammatory protein-1 (DCIP-1) gene [15]. Even though the murine KC gene corresponds to the human CXCL3, CXCL5 and CXCL7 genes, in many papers, CXCL1 and KC are used interchangeably. For this reason, in this review, the researchers distinguish murine KC from human CXCL1.

3.2. CXCL1: Promoter

The CXCL1 gene consists of four exons and three introns. The exons and introns have a total length of 1845 bp [32]. Preceding the transcription start site is a TATA box (at a locus from −30 to −24 bp) preceded by numerous sequences to which various transcriptional activators and transcriptional repressors are attached.
Due to the significance of CXCL1 in inflammatory responses, the most important method for the induction of expression of this chemokine is the activation of NF-κB. At a locus −78 to −66 bp is the nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) binding site [33][34][35][36]. The NF-κB p50/p65 heterodimer attaches to it, inducing CXCL1 expression [37]. Therefore, through NF-κB activation, CXCL1 expression is increased by cytokines such as interleukin-1β (IL-1β) [37][38], tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) [37][38] and interleukin-17 (IL-17) [39][40][41]. Importantly, the activation of NF-κB by the IL-17 receptor (IL-17R) occurs via the NF-κB activator 1 (Act1) → TNF receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF6) → transforming growth factor β (TGF-β)-activated kinase 1 (TAK1) pathway [39][40]. The main effect of IL-17 on CXCL1 expression is an increase in the stability of CXCL1 mRNA [42][43]. In cancer cells, basal NF-κB activation is high, which results in high basal CXCL1 expression [35]. Therefore, in cancer cells, pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β and TNF-α can only increase the stability of CXCL1 mRNA [37]. CXCL1 can also increase its own expression via NF-κB activation, a mechanism that is important in cancer [7][44][45]. The effect of pro-inflammatory cytokines on CXCL1 expression is important because of inflammatory responses in malignant tumors. Depending on the type of cancer, there is an upregulation in pro-inflammatory cytokines, e.g., TNF-α [46] and IL-17 [47][48], which are involved in tumorigenesis.
In some cases, NF-κB can decrease CXCL1 expression. In hepatocytes, there is an important NF-κB p50/p50 homodimer that binds to the CXCL1 promoter to recruit the co-repressor histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1) [49]. This results in reduced CXCL1 expression, which is important for preventing chronic liver disease.
The NF-κB binding site also contains the AT motif (the exact locus is −74 bp and −73 bp), which can attach a high-mobility group, AT-hook 1 (HMGA1) (previous name: high-mobility group-I(Y) (HMGI(Y))) [34][50]. This protein is important for the full activation of the CXCL1 promoter [34].
In the induction of CXCL1 expression by the exposure of cells to TNF-α, the formation of an NF-κB complex with cut-like homeobox 1 (CUX1) is important, and is much more intensely induced in the simultaneous exposure to IL-17 and TNF-α [51]. This complex attaches to the CXCL1 gene promoter at the NF-κB binding site in the −94 bp to −84 bp region of the CXCL1 promoter, i.e., where the binding site for CUX1 is located, leading to an increase in CXCL1 expression. This process is significant in rheumatoid arthritis, which is marked by high concentrations of IL-17 and TNF-α at disease sites [51].
The CXCL1 gene promoter also contains the immediate upstream region (IUR) at loci −93 bp to −78 bp (Figure 1) [50][52]. This region is directly upstream of the NF-κB binding site [33][34][35][36] and can attach to the human CUT homeodomain protein/CCAAT displacement protein (CDP) [53]. Then, CDP disrupts the interaction with the NF-κB of CREB-binding protein (CBP) or p300/CBP-association factor (PCAF) [52]. As CBP and PCAF are coactivators important for the function of NF-κB [54], CDP decreases the expression of CXCL1, which depends on NF-κB [52][53]. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP1) can also attach to the IUR [55][56], although only in the inactive state of PARP1. This inhibits the binding of NF-κB to the CXCL1 promoter, and thus the expression of this gene. In contrast, activated PARP1 loses its ability to bind to the IUR, which results in NF-κB binding to the CXCL1 promoter and an increase in CXCL1 expression [56]. The involvement of PARP1 is important in melanoma tumorigenesis; in normal melanocytes, PARP1 is inactive and inhibits CXCL1 expression, while in melanomas PARP1 is active.
Ijms 23 00792 g001 550
Figure 1. Factors affecting CXCL1 gene transcription. The CXCL1 promoter contains binding sites for factors that bind to these sites. They either increase (shown in red) or decrease (shown in blue) CXCL1 expression. In particular, the CXCL1 promoter contains a binding site for STAT1 and Sp1. STAT1 and Sp1 activated by IFN-γ and TNF-α, respectively, attach to these sites. Sp1 increases CXCL1 expression; however, STAT1 inhibits Sp1 binding to the CXCL1 promoter. Another mechanism regulating CXCL1 expression is IUR, a region that directly borders the NF-κB binding site. CDP binds to IUR, which inhibits the recruitment of CBP and PCAF coactivators by NF-κB. This prevents the induction of CXCL1 expression by NF-κB.
Locus −129 bp to −119 bp is the specificity protein 1 (Sp1) and specificity protein 3 (Sp3) binding site [34][50], important in the basal expression of CXCL1 and the induction of CXCL1 expression by IL-17 and TNF-α [41][57]. This site is also crucial for regulation of the expression of CXCL1 by the interferon-γ (IFN-γ) signal transducer, and the activator of transcription (STAT)1 can also inhibit CXCL1 expression. In particular, in peritoneal mesothelial cells, upon exposure of these cells to IFN-γ, STAT1 binds to the −154 bp region upstream of the transcription start site of the CXCL1 gene, which results in a decreased expression of CXCL1 [57] and reduced binding of Sp1 to the CXCL1 promoter. STAT1 may also increase the expression of CXCL1. However, its effect will depend on the selected cell model and the factor acting on these cells. In pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells, there is an induction of CXCL1 expression by IL-35 [58], which is associated with the direct binding of the STAT1/STAT4 heterodimer to the CXCL1 promoter.

3.2.1. The Regulation of CXCL1 Expression by TGF-β and HGF

TGF-β reduces CXCL1 expression [59][60]. At locus −1247 bp, upstream of the transcription start site of the CXCL1 gene, is the TGF-β-inhibitory element (TIE), and at locus −560 bp is the SMAD-binding element (SBE) [61]. SMAD family member 4 (SMAD4) is the main factor in the signaling from the TGF-β receptor, but does not bind to these sites. Therefore, the effect of TGF-β on CXCL1 expression is indirect, likely reducing the activity of either NF-κB or other signaling pathways [61][62].
In contrast, in murine KC, a paralog for human CXCL1, there is a different mechanism by which TGF-β regulates the expression of this chemokine. At loci −249 bp to −246 bp and −144 bp to −141 bp, upstream of the transcription start site of the KC gene, are SBEs, which can bind SMAD2/3, reducing KC expression [63].
At the upstream transcription start site of the KC gene at loci −128 bp to −120 bp is the CCAAT/enhancer binding protein-β (C/EBP-β) binding motif. Upon activation of c-Met by the hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), C/EBP-β is activated and attaches to the C/EBP-β binding motif on the KC promoter, thus increasing the expression of this murine KC chemokine. Importantly, this mechanism only occurs in murine cells [63]. Based on the database, the researchers did not find any C/EBP-β binding motif according to the cited paper on mouse KC, i.e., 5′-TGGAGCAAG-3′ or any sequence complementary to it up to −2 kbp upstream of the human CXCL1 gene promoter. Therefore, theoretically, C/EBP-β does not directly affect the expression of human CXCL1. In addition, studies on human cells do not show that TGF-β and SMADs directly affect human CXCL1 expression [61]. Nevertheless, further studies on the mechanisms of regulation of CXCL1 expression by HGF and C/EBP-β in humans are required.
The regulation of CXCL1 expression by TGF-β is an important mechanism observed in cancer [61][63]. For example, SMAD4 expression is reduced in colorectal cancer cells, as it interferes with the action of TGF-β, and thus leads to an increase in CXCL1 expression in the cancer cell [61]. Notably, in a prostate cancer tumor, in cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAF), there is a decrease in TGF-β type II receptor (TβRII) expression [64]. This decreases the effect of TGF-β on these cells, and thus leads to the increased expression of CXCL1 in these cells. As CXCL1 is a chemotactic factor for neutrophils [65], an increase in CXCL1 expression in colorectal cancer tumors results in the recruitment of tumor-associated neutrophils (TAN), cells with pro-cancer properties [61][66]. Additionally, CXCL1 causes tumor cell migration, and consequently, metastasis [60].

3.2.2. Significance of p53 Transcription Factor Family in CXCL1 Expression

Gain-of-function and loss-of-function mutations of the TP53 gene are very common in cancer cells and lead to changes in the expression of various genes [67][68]. Loss-of-function TP53 mutations cause an increase in CXCL1 expression [69] due to reduced p53-induced inhibition of NF-κB activation [70][71]. If p53 loses its functions, there is an increase in NF-κB activity and in the expression of genes dependent on this transcription factor. This mechanism is not universal in all cells because in monocytes and macrophages, p53 together with NF-κB increase the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines [72]. In addition, the interaction of CXCL1 with p53 is complicated, as CXCR2 activation reduces p53 expression, this action is associated with protein kinase B (PKB)/Akt activation, which in turn activates murine double minute 2 (Mdm2) [73].
The gain-of-function TP53 mutations cause mutated p53 proteins to directly bind to the CXCL1 promoter, which results in an increased CXCL1 expression in the tumor cell [74][75]. The exact mechanism of the increase in CXCL1 expression depends on the type of p53 mutation. DNA-contact p53 mutants (for example R248Q and R273H) bind directly to the CXCL1 promoter [75]. Some of the single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) of p53 may increase the ability of p53 with the aforementioned mutation to attach to the CXCL1 promoter. An example of this is the P72R SNP polymorphism of p53 (rs1042522) [75]. The R72 p53 mutant has a higher binding capacity to the CXCL1 promoter than the P72 p53 mutant. DNA-contact p53 mutants also increase NF-κB activation, which increases the expression of genes dependent on this transcription factor, including CXCL1 [69].
Another type of mutation is the Zn2+ region conformational p53 mutant. Examples of such p53 mutants are R175H and H179R, which attach directly to the CXCL1 promoter, and thus increase CXCL1 expression [74]. It appears that p53 with this type of mutation also increases CXCL1 expression by increasing H-Ras activity [69]. This effect is related to the interaction of mutant p53 with B-cell translocation gene 2 (BTG2). Significantly, NF-κB is not required in the induction of CXCL1 expression by Zn2+ region conformational p53 mutants [74].
The last type of mutation is the L3 loop conformational p53 mutant [69]. An example of such a mutation is G245S p53. Although this type of p53 mutation increases CXCL1 expression, the effect is much smaller than when p53 expression is significantly reduced [69]. This is likely due to the reduced effect of p53 with such a mutation, relative to wild-type (WT) p53.
Another protein that attaches near the CXCL1 gene is p63, a transcription factor from the p53 transcription factor family [76][77]. Both proteins (p53 and p63) induce the expression of different genes, but can also cooperate in the expression of the same genes. p63 attaches to the −3 kb region of the upstream transcription start site of the CXCL1 gene, thus increasing its expression [77]. This transcription factor may also cooperate with NF-κB in increasing CXCL1 expression. The significance of p63 in CXCL1 expression was found in tumors, particularly in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells.

3.2.3. CXCL1 Expression and Hypoxia

The promoter of murine KC, a paralog for human CXCL1, contains five hypoxia response element (HRE) sequences at loci −1309 bp, −433 bp, −313 bp, −302 bp and −289 bp [78]. The expression of this gene is induced by hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-2, as shown by studies in mouse epithelial cells [79] and murine chondrocytes [78]. HIF-1 also increases KC expression in murine myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) [80]. CXCL1 expression may depend indirectly on HIF-1; for example, in human aortic endothelial cells and mouse aortic endothelial cells, HIF-1 increases miR-19a expression [81], which indirectly increases the expression of CXCL1. Based on database, the researchers identified seven sequences thought to be an HRE, i.e., 5′-A/GCGTG-3′ and complementary ones in the region up to the −2 kbp upstream transcription start site of the human CXCL1 gene [82][83]. HRE is the binding site of HIF-1 and HIF-2, transcription factors activated by hypoxia. Therefore, it seems theoretically possible that hypoxia increases CXCL1 expression—this was already shown by a study involving hepatocellular carcinoma cells [84]. Nevertheless, this effect may depend on the particular research model, as hypoxia did not affect CXCL1 expression in lung adenocarcinoma cells [85].

3.2.4. Other Mechanisms That Alter CXCL1 Promoter Activity

In addition to the effects on CXCL1 expression of the aforementioned factor binding sites near the transcription start site, there are also regulatory sequences located at various distances from the CXCL1 gene.
CXCL1 expression is increased in an AP-1-dependent manner, as shown by experiments using IL-17 [41] and TNF-α [86][87].
The transcription factors responsible for the induction of CXCL1 expression by TNF-α also include early growth response gene 1 (Egr-1) [50], which binds directly to the CXCL1 promoter at two loci: −367 bp and −134 bp. This process is significant in cancer, particularly in esophageal cancer, where Erg-1 is frequently overexpressed [88].
Studies on breast cancer cells showed that a breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 (BRCA1) complex with GATA-binding protein 3 (GATA3) reduced CXCL1 expression [89]. Nevertheless, further studies are required to determine whether this effect is direct or indirect.
Other transcription factors also attach to the CXCL1 promoter. In particular, the activation of transcription factor 2 (ATF2) and acute myeloid leukemia 1 (AML1) is responsible for the increase in CXCL1 transcription by IL-17, which attaches to the CXCL1 promoter [41].
At locus −277 bp, upstream of the transcription start site of the CXCL1 gene, a binding site for myeloid ecotropic viral integration site 1 (MEIS1) was identified [90]. MEIS1 is a transcription factor that is overexpressed in cancer cells, particularly in ovarian cancer, increasing the expression of many chemokines including CCL18, CCL4, CXCL7, and indirectly increasing the expression of CXCL1, as the identified binding site of this transcription factor appears to be non-functional.
At −375 bp upstream of the transcription start site of the CXCL1 gene, a binding site for the microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) was identified [91]. This is a transcription factor important for melanocyte differentiation. It also undergoes overexpression in melanoma. Therefore, the increase in CXCL1 expression in melanoma depends partly on MITF.
The −551 bp to −517 bp region upstream of the transcription start site region of the KC gene contains a binding site for Y-box protein-1 (YB-1) [92]. KC expression is induced upon the binding of this protein; this process is relevant in a murine bile duct ligation model, where the expression of KC increases in the liver in a YB-1-dependent manner. However, further studies are required to confirm the role of YB-1 in humans.
The −984 bp to −301 bp region, upstream of the transcription start site of the CXCL1 gene, contains a binding site for Snail, a transcription factor crucial for epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) [93][94], a process important in cancer cell migration, invasion and metastasis. After EMT, the tumor cell begins to migrate. The increased expression of CXCL1 in this cell plays an important role in migration [95] and metastasis formation [64][96] by stimulating the tumor cell to migrate, and causing the supporting adhesion of the tumor cell to target tissues, as well as in the recruitment of different cells in metastasis.
Further from the transcription start site of the CXCL1 gene at the locus −2 kbp, a Hey-like (HeyL) binding site is located [97][98]. This factor belongs to Notch signaling, which is overexpressed in many cancers, such as in breast cancer. Because CXCL1 is an angiogenic chemokine [12][13], Notch signaling in cancer increases CXCL1 expression, and thus causes angiogenesis.
Some proteins regulating the expression of CXCL1 can be bound very far from the CXCL1 gene. In particular, avian v-maf musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma oncogene homolog (MAF)F binds to three sites, precisely at the −15 kpb, −12.5 kpb and −7.5 kbp upstream of the transcription start site of CXCL1 gene [99]. MAFF increases CXCL1 expression in human term myometrium [99][100]. However, to date, the function of CXCL1 during labor is unknown. The mechanism of induction of CXCL1 expression in human term myometrium is not related to inflammatory factors, which means that CXCL1 expression is induced by a specific transcription factor independent of inflammatory responses [99]. This shows that CXCL1 is not only a mediator of inflammatory responses but may also have its own physiological functions unrelated to inflammation.
Histone methylation is another important means of regulating CXCL1 expression. A −2.0 to −1.5 kbp fragment upstream of the transcription start site of the CXCL1 gene undergoes histone H3 Lys36 trimethylation (H3K36me3) by histone H3 lysine 36 methyltransferase SET-domain-containing 2 (SETD2) [101]. This leads to a reduction in CXCL1 expression. This process is important because, in cancers such as breast cancer [102], glioblastoma multiforme [103], hepatocellular carcinoma [104] and lung adenocarcinoma [101] the SETD2 gene is either mutated or there is a decreased expression of the product of this gene. However, in castration-resistant prostate cancer, SETD2 is an oncogene that supports tumor growth [105]. The precise regulation of CXCL1 expression by SETD2 is not known. As this enzyme modifies a fragment very far from the CXCL1 gene, it is possible that it alters the ability to bind some proteins that are important for the regulation of gene expression (Table 1).
Table 1. Proteins that bind to the CXCL1 gene promoter, leading to a change in its expression.
Name of the Factor BINDING SITE Effect on Expression Notes References
p50:p65 NF-κB −78 bp to −66bp ↑ High basal NF-κB activity in cancer conditions; high basal CXCL1 expression in tumors.
Activated in inflammation		 [33][34][35][36]
p50:p50 NF-κB ? ↓ Prevention of chronic liver disease [49]
HMGA1 From −74 bp to −73 bp ↑ Essential in the full activation of the CXCL1 promoter by NF-κB [34]
CDP from −93 bp to −78 bp ↓ Reduction in CXCL1 expression by disruption of NF-κB function [50][52][53]
PARP1 from −93 bp to −78 bp ↓ PARP1 binding in the inactive state. Inhibition of NF-κB binding to the CXCL1 promoter [55][56]
CUX1 −94 bp to −84 bp ↑ Enhancement of CXCL1 expression by the joint action of IL-17 and TNF-α [51]
Sp1 −129 bp to −119 bp ↑ Significant in basal CXCL1 expression and in upregulation of CXCL1 expression by IL-17 or TNF-α [34][50]
STAT1 −154 bp ↓ Reduction in CXCL1 expression by IFN-γ through disruption of Sp1 function [57]
STAT1/STAT4 ? ↑ Enhancement of CXCL1 expression by IL-35 [58]
HIF-1 and HIF-2 ? (↑) Increased expression of CXCL1 in hypoxia. No precise studies on the direct effect [84]
MEIS1 −277 bp (↑) Sequence identified as potential binding site but non-functional. Factor influence indirect. Relevant in cancer, particularly in ovarian cancer [90]
Erg-1 −367 bp and −134 bp ↑ Important in cancer, especially in esophageal cancer [88]
MITF −375 bp ↑ Important in cancer, especially in melanoma cancer [91]
Snail from −984 bp to −301 bp ↑ Increased CXCL1 expression during EMT, important in cancer during metastasis formation [94]
SMAD4 −1247 bp and
−560 bp		 (↓) Sequences identified as potential binding sites but non-functional. Theoretically, when TGF-β action is reduced, the effect of SMAD4 is abolished, and thus CXCL1 expression increases [61]
SETD2 from −2.0 to −1.5 kbp ↓ This is the enzyme that causes histone methylation. The exact mechanisms of how epigenetic changes in this region affect CXCL1 expression are not known [101]
HeyL −2 kbp ↑ Notch signaling element. Relevant for cancer [97][98]
Mutated p53 ? ↑ Relevant in cancers with TP53 gene mutation [74][75]
p63 −3 kb ↑ Relevant in cancer, especially in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells [77]
MAFF −15 kpb,
−12.5 kpb and
−7.5 kbp		 ↑ Induction of CXCL1 expression in human term myometrium, immediately before birth. The exact functions of CXCL1 in labor are unknown [99]

3.3. Regulation during Transcription

The induction of signaling pathways and attachment of all transcription factors to the promoter of the CXCL1 gene is followed by transcription. RNA polymerase II (Pol II) begins to transcribe the CXCL1 mRNA fragment with a length of approximately 50 nucleotides [106]. Then, transcription elongation requires the phosphorylation on Ser2 of Pol II by positive transcription elongation factor b (P-TEFb). Hairy and Enhancer of Split-1 (Hes1) prevent this phosphorylation, and therefore inhibit CXCL1 transcription [106]. This regulation occurs particularly in macrophages treated with pro-inflammatory agents such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS) [107].

4. CXCL1 mRNA Stability as a Method to Regulate CXCL1 Expression

The production of a 1.1–1.2 kb-long transcript [7] is followed by the next step: the regulation of CXCL1 expression, associated with changes in the stability of CXCL1 mRNA [108]. CXCL1 mRNA is a transcript with a low half-life; if the cell is not influenced by any factors that increase its stability, then this transcript is degraded within 1 to 4 h [109][110]. The half-life of CXCL1 mRNA is estimated to be approximately 15 min [37]. After this time, from the ends of the 3′-untranslated region (UTR) of CXCL1 mRNA, an approximately 130-nucleotide fragment is removed [109][110]. CXCL1 mRNA is transformed into a 0.9 kb transcript. However, there are many mechanisms, some of which increase and some of which decrease the half-life of CXCL1 mRNA. In particular, regions 6–23 and 632–651 on the 3′-UTR of CXCL1 mRNA are responsible for increasing the stability of the transcript. Region 562–581 on the 3′-UTR of CXCL1 mRNA is responsible for decreasing the stability of CXCL1 mRNA [111]. The AUUUA motifs on the 3′-UTR also act to reduce the stability of CXCL1 mRNA [42].
Various proteins that are activated by factors such as IL-1 [37][109][110], TNF-α [37] and IL-17 [43] are responsible for increasing CXCL1 mRNA stability. This effect depends on the cell type and tissue selected as the research model, as these factors can also increase CXCL1 transcription, e.g., depending on NF-κB activation [37][39][57]. Notably, in non-cancer cells, where there is no high basal NF-κB activation, transcriptional regulation plays a major role in regulating CXCL1 expression [37]. Additionally, no less important for CXCL1 mRNA stability are miRNAs, which cause the decay of this transcript [112][113][114][115][116][117]. All of the factors mentioned in this section lead to the degradation or improvement in the stability of CXCL1 mRNA. This alters the half-life of CXCL1 mRNA, and consequently, the number of these transcripts in the cytoplasm, at unchanged CXCL1 gene transcription levels.

4.1. Role of Cytokines in Regulating CXCL1 Expression by Altering mRNA Stability. The Mechanisms of IL-17-Induced Effects on CXCL1 Expression

CXCL1 mRNA decay is IL-17-sensitive. In unstimulated cells, splicing factor 2 (SF2)/alternative splicing factor (ASF) attaches to the 3′-UTR of CXCL1 mRNA, which reduces the stability of this transcript [118]. This factor attaches to CXCL1 mRNA sites other than tristetraprolin (TTP). The activation of the receptor for IL-17 leads to activation of Act1, TRAF2 and TRAF5. Act1 causes the phosphorylation of SF2/ASF via the inhibitor of NF-κB kinase ε (IKKε) [43] and forms the Act1-TRAF2-TRAF5-SF2/ASF complex [118][119]. In this complex, SF2/ASF is no longer bound to CXCL1 mRNA, which increases the stability of this transcript. At the same time, Act1 causes K63-linked polyubiquitination of the human antigen R (HuR) [108]. This process is dependent on Ubc13-Uev1A E2 complex. Therefore, modified HuR binds to the AU-rich element (ARE) on CXCL1 mRNA, causing its stabilization; HuR also promotes the translation of CXCL1.
Act1 can also cause the phosphorylation of decapping 1 (Dcp1) via TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK1) [43]. This inhibits the decapping of CXCL1 mRNA, and of other transcripts. On the 3′-UTR of CXCL1 mRNA, there is a fragment at locus 780–900 that forms a secondary structure with four stem loops. This is a “similar expression to fibroblast growth factor genes + IL-17R” (SEFIR)-binding element. Act1 binds directly to it, which increases the stability of the transcript in question by competing with SF2/ASF binding [43].
IL-17 increases CXCL1 mRNA stability, and thus CXCL1 expression. Nevertheless, IL-17 can also increase CXCL1 transcription, but this effect is not as significant as the change in CXCL1 mRNA stability and may also depend on the research model chosen [41]. An increase in CXCL1 transcription is associated with NF-κB activation by the IL-17R receptor [39][40][41]. Additionally, other transcription factors increase CXCL1 expression, including AP1, ATF2, AML1 and SP1 [41][57].
In macrophages [120], keratinocytes [36] and fibroblasts [121], tristetraprolin (TTP) is responsible for reducing the stability of KC mRNA, as shown by experiments on mouse cells. TTP binds to AREs and, more specifically, to AUUUA motifs on the 3′-UTR of KC mRNA. This leads to a recruitment of the deadenylases, and consequently, to a decay of KC mRNA. However, activated p38 MAPK by LPS can activate the MAPK-activated protein kinase 2 (MK2) [122]. This kinase phosphorylates TTP, which does not affect the binding of TTP to mRNA but prevents the recruitment of deadenylases by this factor and prevents the decay of KC mRNA [123]. However, research on human cells showed that TTP does not affect the stability of CXCL1 mRNA [42].

4.2. The Role of miRNAs in the Regulation of CXCL1 Expression

To date, many miRNAs have been found to be involved in reducing CXCL1 expression. In particular, many of them have important roles in cancer due to the pro-tumorigenic properties of CXCL1 (Figure 2) [4][114][124][125]. The development of cancer is associated with a decrease in the expression of miRNAs regulating CXCL1 expression in the tumor, and consequently, is associated with an increase in the expression of this chemokine. In ovarian cancer, renal cancer [112] and hepatocellular carcinoma [114], there is a downregulation of the miR-200 family [112]; in ovarian cancer there is a downregulation of miR-27b-5p [116]; and in gastric cancer, there is a downregulation of miR-204 [115]. Other examples include miR-302e in colorectal cancer [117] and miR-141 in non-small cell lung cancer [113].
Ijms 23 00792 g002 550
Figure 2. Effect of microRNAs on CXCL1 expression in a tumor. In cancer tumors, CXCL1 expression is regulated by microRNAs. Based on the available literature, six different microRNAs that decrease CXCL1 expression have been identified to date.
A change in miRNA expression may also account for the effects of some anticancer substances. An example of this is the increased expression of miR-181b in breast cancer cells by curcumin [126]. This miRNA directly decreases CXCL1 expression, which is one of the anticancer mechanisms of curcumin.
It is also possible that miRNAs affect signaling pathways that increase the expression of chemokines, which would mean that such miRNAs indirectly decrease CXCL1 expression. An example of this is miR-155 in tumor-infiltrating MDSCs [80]. This miRNA decreases HIF-1 levels, and thus the expression of genes dependent on the transcription factor HIF-1, such as CXCL1.
CXCL1 expression can also be indirectly increased by miRNAs. Examples of this are miR-155, miR-193b and miR-210 [127]. These miRNAs are secreted in extracellular vesicles by cancer cells, and then increase CXCL1 expression in fibroblasts. This mechanism was demonstrated in gastric cancer [127].
It is not only in cancers that the regulation of CXCL1 expression by miRNAs occurs. During cerebral ischemia–reperfusion injury, there is a downregulation of miR-429 in brain microvascular endothelial cells [128] and miR-532-5p in brain tissues [129]. At least for miR-532-5p, this was shown to be related to the promoter of this miRNA: hypermethylation. Both miRNAs directly reduce the expression of CXCL1. Therefore, when the levels of these miRNAs are decreased, there is an increase in CXCL1 expression, which leads to brain tissue damage during cerebral ischemia–reperfusion injury.
Additionally, studies of extracellular vesicles from murine, adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells showed that they contain miR-150-5p [130]. This miRNA reduces the expression of KC. This chemokine is important in the development of hepatic fibrosis. Therefore, adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells may inhibit the development of hepatic fibrosis.
Another miRNA that reduces CXCL1 expression is miR-7641 [131]. The expression of this miRNA occurs in human embryonic stem cells and decreases during endothelial cell biogenesis. This increases the expression of CXCL1, a chemokine also important in angiogenesis.

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/ijms23020792

References

  1. Pérez-Tomás, R.; Pérez-Guillén, I. Lactate in the Tumor Microenvironment: An Essential Molecule in Cancer Progression and Treatment. Cancers 2020, 12, 3244.
  2. Han, L.; Lam, E.W.; Sun, Y. Extracellular vesicles in the tumor microenvironment: Old stories, but new tales. Mol. Cancer 2019, 18, 59.
  3. Hughes, C.E.; Nibbs, R.J.B. A guide to chemokines and their receptors. FEBS J. 2018, 285, 2944–2971.
  4. Richmond, A.; Lawson, D.H.; Nixon, D.W.; Chawla, R.K. Characterization of autostimulatory and transforming growth factors from human melanoma cells. Cancer Res. 1985, 45, 6390–6394.
  5. Schröder, J.M.; Persoon, N.L.; Christophers, E. Lipopolysaccharide-stimulated human monocytes secrete, apart from neutrophil-activating peptide 1/interleukin 8, a second neutrophil-activating protein. NH2-terminal amino acid sequence identity with melanoma growth stimulatory activity. J. Exp. Med. 1990, 171, 1091–1100.
  6. Anisowicz, A.; Bardwell, L.; Sager, R. Constitutive overexpression of a growth-regulated gene in transformed Chinese hamster and human cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1987, 84, 7188–7192.
  7. Richmond, A.; Balentien, E.; Thomas, H.G.; Flaggs, G.; Barton, D.E.; Spiess, J.; Bordoni, R.; Francke, U.; Derynck, R. Molecular characterization and chromosomal mapping of melanoma growth stimulatory activity, a growth factor structurally related to beta-thromboglobulin. EMBO J. 1988, 7, 2025–2033.
  8. Zhang, Y.; Wu, J.Z.; Yang, Y.Q.; Ma, R.; Zhang, J.Y.; Feng, J.F. Expression of growth-regulated oncogene-1, hepatocyte growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor-AA and soluble E-selectin and their association with high-risk human papillomavirus infection in squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Mol. Med. Rep. 2014, 10, 1013–1024.
  9. Heim, C.E.; Yamada, K.J.; Fallet, R.; Odvody, J.; Schwarz, D.M.; Lyden, E.R.; Anderson, M.J.; Alter, R.; Vidlak, D.; Hartman, C.W.; et al. Orthopaedic Surgery Elicits a Systemic Anti-Inflammatory Signature. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 2123.
  10. Haskill, S.; Peace, A.; Morris, J.; Sporn, S.A.; Anisowicz, A.; Lee, S.W.; Smith, T.; Martin, G.; Ralph, P.; Sager, R. Identification of three related human GRO genes encoding cytokine functions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1990, 87, 7732–7736.
  11. Zlotnik, A.; Yoshie, O. Chemokines: A new classification system and their role in immunity. Immunity 2000, 12, 121–127.
  12. Strieter, R.M.; Polverini, P.J.; Kunkel, S.L.; Arenberg, D.A.; Burdick, M.D.; Kasper, J.; Dzuiba, J.; Van Damme, J.; Walz, A.; Marriott, D.; et al. The functional role of the ELR motif in CXC chemokine-mediated angiogenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 27348–27357.
  13. Addison, C.L.; Daniel, T.O.; Burdick, M.D.; Liu, H.; Ehlert, J.E.; Xue, Y.Y.; Buechi, L.; Walz, A.; Richmond, A.; Strieter, R.M. The CXC chemokine receptor 2, CXCR2, is the putative receptor for ELR+ CXC chemokine-induced angiogenic activity. J. Immunol. 2000, 165, 5269–5277.
  14. Tunnacliffe, A.; Majumdar, S.; Yan, B.; Poncz, M. Genes for beta-thromboglobulin and platelet factor 4 are closely linked and form part of a cluster of related genes on chromosome 4. Blood 1992, 79, 2896–2900.
  15. Nomiyama, H.; Osada, N.; Yoshie, O. Systematic classification of vertebrate chemokines based on conserved synteny and evolutionary history. Genes Cells 2013, 18, 1–16.
  16. O’Donovan, N.; Galvin, M.; Morgan, J.G. Physical mapping of the CXC chemokine locus on human chromosome 4. Cytogenet Cell Genet 1999, 84, 39–42.
  17. Nomiyama, H.; Mera, A.; Ohneda, O.; Miura, R.; Suda, T.; Yoshie, O. Organization of the chemokine genes in the human and mouse major clusters of CC and CXC chemokines: Diversification between the two species. Genes Immun. 2001, 2, 110–113.
  18. Shattuck-Brandt, R.L.; Wood, L.D.; Richmond, A. Identification and characterization of an MGSA/GRO pseudogene. DNA Seq. 1997, 7, 379–386.
  19. Alvarez, H.; Opalinska, J.; Zhou, L.; Sohal, D.; Fazzari, M.J.; Yu, Y.; Montagna, C.; Montgomery, E.A.; Canto, M.; Dunbar, K.B.; et al. Widespread hypomethylation occurs early and synergizes with gene amplification during esophageal carcinogenesis. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7, e1001356.
  20. Acharyya, S.; Oskarsson, T.; Vanharanta, S.; Malladi, S.; Kim, J.; Morris, P.G.; Manova-Todorova, K.; Leversha, M.; Hogg, N.; Seshan, V.E.; et al. A CXCL1 paracrine network links cancer chemoresistance and metastasis. Cell 2012, 150, 165–178.
  21. Yang, X.R.; Brown, K.; Landi, M.T.; Ghiorzo, P.; Badenas, C.; Xu, M.; Hayward, N.K.; Calista, D.; Landi, G.; Bruno, W.; et al. Duplication of CXC chemokine genes on chromosome 4q13 in a melanoma-prone family. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2012, 25, 243–247.
  22. Schumacher, C.; Clark-Lewis, I.; Baggiolini, M.; Moser, B. High- and low-affinity binding of GRO alpha and neutrophil-activating peptide 2 to interleukin 8 receptors on human neutrophils. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1992, 89, 10542–10546.
  23. Loetscher, P.; Seitz, M.; Clark-Lewis, I.; Baggiolini, M.; Moser, B. Both interleukin-8 receptors independently mediate chemotaxis. Jurkat cells transfected with IL-8R1 or IL-8R2 migrate in response to IL-8, GRO alpha and NAP-2. FEBS Lett. 1994, 341, 187–192.
  24. Ahuja, S.K.; Murphy, P.M. The CXC chemokines growth-regulated oncogene (GRO) alpha, GRObeta, GROgamma, neutrophil-activating peptide-2, and epithelial cell-derived neutrophil-activating peptide-78 are potent agonists for the type B, but not the type A, human interleukin-8 receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 20545–20550.
  25. Fan, X.; Patera, A.C.; Pong-Kennedy, A.; Deno, G.; Gonsiorek, W.; Manfra, D.J.; Vassileva, G.; Zeng, M.; Jackson, C.; Sullivan, L.; et al. Murine CXCR1 is a functional receptor for GCP-2/CXCL6 and interleukin-8/CXCL8. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 11658–11666.
  26. Girbl, T.; Lenn, T.; Perez, L.; Rolas, L.; Barkaway, A.; Thiriot, A.; Del Fresno, C.; Lynam, E.; Hub, E.; Thelen, M.; et al. Distinct Compartmentalization of the Chemokines CXCL1 and CXCL2 and the Atypical Receptor ACKR1 Determine Discrete Stages of Neutrophil Diapedesis. Immunity 2018, 49, 1062–1076.e6.
  27. Smith, J.B.; Rovai, L.E.; Herschman, H.R. Sequence similarities of a subgroup of CXC chemokines related to murine LIX: Implications for the interpretation of evolutionary relationships among chemokines. J. Leukoc. Biol. 1997, 62, 598–603.
  28. Belperio, J.A.; Keane, M.P.; Burdick, M.D.; Gomperts, B.N.; Xue, Y.Y.; Hong, K.; Mestas, J.; Zisman, D.; Ardehali, A.; Saggar, R.; et al. CXCR2/CXCR2 ligand biology during lung transplant ischemia-reperfusion injury. J. Immunol. 2005, 175, 6931–6939.
  29. Zagorski, J.; DeLarco, J.E. Rat CINC (cytokine-induced neutrophil chemoattractant) is the homolog of the human GRO proteins but is encoded by a single gene. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1993, 190, 104–110.
  30. Deng, Z.W.; Denkinger, D.J.; Peterson, K.E.; Deuel, T.F.; Kawahara, R.S. Glucocorticoids negatively regulate the transcription of KC, the mouse homolog of MGSA/GRO. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1994, 203, 1809–1814.
  31. Bozic, C.R.; Kolakowski, L.F., Jr.; Gerard, N.P.; Garcia-Rodriguez, C.; von Uexkull-Guldenband, C.; Conklyn, M.J.; Breslow, R.; Showell, H.J.; Gerard, C. Expression and biologic characterization of the murine chemokine KC. J. Immunol. 1995, 154, 6048–6057.
  32. Baker, N.E.; Kucera, G.; Richmond, A. Nucleotide sequence of the human melanoma growth stimulatory activity (MGSA) gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990, 18, 6453.
  33. Anisowicz, A.; Messineo, M.; Lee, S.W.; Sager, R. An NF-kappa B-like transcription factor mediates IL-1/TNF-alpha induction of gro in human fibroblasts. J. Immunol. 1991, 147, 520–527.
  34. Wood, L.D.; Farmer, A.A.; Richmond, A. HMGI(Y) and Sp1 in addition to NF-kappa B regulate transcription of the MGSA/GRO alpha gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995, 23, 4210–4219.
  35. Devalaraja, M.N.; Wang, D.Z.; Ballard, D.W.; Richmond, A. Elevated constitutive IkappaB kinase activity and IkappaB-alpha phosphorylation in Hs294T melanoma cells lead to increased basal MGSA/GRO-alpha transcription. Cancer Res. 1999, 59, 1372–1377.
  36. Wu, Z.; Neufeld, H.; Torlakovic, E.; Xiao, W. Uev1A-Ubc13 promotes colorectal cancer metastasis through regulating CXCL1 expression via NF-кB activation. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 15952–15967.
  37. Shattuck, R.L.; Wood, L.D.; Jaffe, G.J.; Richmond, A. MGSA/GRO transcription is differentially regulated in normal retinal pigment epithelial and melanoma cells. Mol. Cell Biol. 1994, 14, 791–802.
  38. Cuenca, R.E.; Azizkhan, R.G.; Haskill, S. Characterization of GRO alpha, beta and gamma expression in human colonic tumours: Potential significance of cytokine involvement. Surg. Oncol. 1992, 1, 323–329.
  39. Huang, F.; Kao, C.Y.; Wachi, S.; Thai, P.; Ryu, J.; Wu, R. Requirement for both JAK-mediated PI3K signaling and ACT1/TRAF6/TAK1-dependent NF-kappaB activation by IL-17A in enhancing cytokine expression in human airway epithelial cells. J. Immunol. 2007, 179, 6504–6513.
  40. You, Z.; Ge, D.; Liu, S.; Zhang, Q.; Borowsky, A.D.; Melamed, J. Interleukin-17 Induces Expression of Chemokines and Cytokines in Prostatic Epithelial Cells but Does Not Stimulate Cell Growth In Vitro. Int. J. Med. Biol. Front. 2012, 18, 629–644.
  41. Wu, H.H.; Hwang-Verslues, W.W.; Lee, W.H.; Huang, C.K.; Wei, P.C.; Chen, C.L.; Shew, J.Y.; Lee, E.Y.; Jeng, Y.M.; Tien, Y.W.; et al. Targeting IL-17B-IL-17RB signaling with an anti-IL-17RB antibody blocks pancreatic cancer metastasis by silencing multiple chemokines. J. Exp. Med. 2015, 212, 333–349.
  42. Datta, S.; Novotny, M.; Pavicic, P.G., Jr.; Zhao, C.; Herjan, T.; Hartupee, J.; Hamilton, T. IL-17 regulates CXCL1 mRNA stability via an AUUUA/tristetraprolin-independent sequence. J. Immunol. 2010, 184, 1484–1491.
  43. Herjan, T.; Hong, L.; Bubenik, J.; Bulek, K.; Qian, W.; Liu, C.; Li, X.; Chen, X.; Yang, H.; Ouyang, S.; et al. IL-17-receptor-associated adaptor Act1 directly stabilizes mRNAs to mediate IL-17 inflammatory signaling. Nat. Immunol. 2018, 19, 354–365.
  44. Wang, D.; Richmond, A. Nuclear factor-kappa B activation by the CXC chemokine melanoma growth-stimulatory activity/growth-regulated protein involves the MEKK1/p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 3650–3659.
  45. Wilson, C.; Purcell, C.; Seaton, A.; Oladipo, O.; Maxwell, P.J.; O’Sullivan, J.M.; Wilson, R.H.; Johnston, P.G.; Waugh, D.J. Chemotherapy-induced CXC-chemokine/CXC-chemokine receptor signaling in metastatic prostate cancer cells confers resistance to oxaliplatin through potentiation of nuclear factor-kappaB transcription and evasion of apoptosis. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2008, 327, 746–759.
  46. Szlosarek, P.W.; Grimshaw, M.J.; Kulbe, H.; Wilson, J.L.; Wilbanks, G.D.; Burke, F.; Balkwill, F.R. Expression and regulation of tumor necrosis factor alpha in normal and malignant ovarian epithelium. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2006, 5, 382–390.
  47. Liu, Z.; Yang, L.; Xu, J.; Zhang, X.; Wang, B. Enhanced expression and clinical significance of chemokine receptor CXCR2 in hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Surg. Res. 2011, 166, 241–246.
  48. Tsai, Y.F.; Huang, C.C.; Lin, Y.S.; Hsu, C.Y.; Huang, C.P.; Liu, C.Y.; Chiu, J.H.; Tseng, L.M. Interleukin 17A promotes cell migration, enhances anoikis resistance, and creates a microenvironment suitable for triple negative breast cancer tumor metastasis. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2021, 70, 2339–2351.
  49. Wilson, C.L.; Jurk, D.; Fullard, N.; Banks, P.; Page, A.; Luli, S.; Elsharkawy, A.M.; Gieling, R.G.; Chakraborty, J.B.; Fox, C.; et al. NFκB1 is a suppressor of neutrophil-driven hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat. Commun 2015, 6, 6818.
  50. Shin, S.Y.; Lee, J.M.; Lim, Y.; Lee, Y.H. Transcriptional regulation of the growth-regulated oncogene α gene by early growth response protein-1 in response to tumor necrosis factor α stimulation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2013, 1829, 1066–1074.
  51. Slowikowski, K.; Nguyen, H.N.; Noss, E.H.; Simmons, D.P.; Mizoguchi, F.; Watts, G.F.M.; Gurish, M.F.; Brenner, M.B.; Raychaudhuri, S. CUX1 and IκBζ (NFKBIZ) mediate the synergistic inflammatory response to TNF and IL-17A in stromal fibroblasts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 5532–5541.
  52. Ueda, Y.; Su, Y.; Richmond, A. CCAAT displacement protein regulates nuclear factor-kappa beta-mediated chemokine transcription in melanoma cells. Melanoma Res. 2007, 17, 91–103.
  53. Nirodi, C.; Hart, J.; Dhawan, P.; Moon, N.S.; Nepveu, A.; Richmond, A. The role of CDP in the negative regulation of CXCL1 gene expression. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 26122–26131.
  54. Sheppard, K.A.; Rose, D.W.; Haque, Z.K.; Kurokawa, R.; McInerney, E.; Westin, S.; Thanos, D.; Rosenfeld, M.G.; Glass, C.K.; Collins, T. Transcriptional activation by NF-kappaB requires multiple coactivators. Mol. Cell Biol. 1999, 19, 6367–6378.
  55. Nirodi, C.; NagDas, S.; Gygi, S.P.; Olson, G.; Aebersold, R.; Richmond, A. A role for poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in the transcriptional regulation of the melanoma growth stimulatory activity (CXCL1) gene expression. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 9366–9374.
  56. Amiri, K.I.; Ha, H.C.; Smulson, M.E.; Richmond, A. Differential regulation of CXC ligand 1 transcription in melanoma cell lines by poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1. Oncogene 2006, 25, 7714–7722.
  57. Catar, R.A.; Chen, L.; Cuff, S.M.; Kift-Morgan, A.; Eberl, M.; Kettritz, R.; Kamhieh-Milz, J.; Moll, G.; Li, Q.; Zhao, H.; et al. Control of neutrophil influx during peritonitis by transcriptional cross-regulation of chemokine CXCL1 by IL-17 and IFN-γ. J. Pathol. 2020, 251, 175–186.
  58. Huang, C.; Li, Z.; Li, N.; Li, Y.; Chang, A.; Zhao, T.; Wang, X.; Wang, H.; Gao, S.; Yang, S.; et al. Interleukin 35 Expression Correlates With Microvessel Density in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma, Recruits Monocytes, and Promotes Growth and Angiogenesis of Xenograft Tumors in Mice. Gastroenterology 2018, 154, 675–688.
  59. Bierie, B.; Stover, D.G.; Abel, T.W.; Chytil, A.; Gorska, A.E.; Aakre, M.; Forrester, E.; Yang, L.; Wagner, K.U.; Moses, H.L. Transforming growth factor-beta regulates mammary carcinoma cell survival and interaction with the adjacent microenvironment. Cancer Res. 2008, 68, 1809–1819.
  60. Bernard, S.; Myers, M.; Fang, W.B.; Zinda, B.; Smart, C.; Lambert, D.; Zou, A.; Fan, F.; Cheng, N. CXCL1 Derived from Mammary Fibroblasts Promotes Progression of Mammary Lesions to Invasive Carcinoma through CXCR2 Dependent Mechanisms. J. Mammary Gland. Biol. Neoplasia 2018, 23, 249–267.
  61. Ogawa, R.; Yamamoto, T.; Hirai, H.; Hanada, K.; Kiyasu, Y.; Nishikawa, G.; Mizuno, R.; Inamoto, S.; Itatani, Y.; Sakai, Y.; et al. Loss of SMAD4 Promotes Colorectal Cancer Progression by Recruiting Tumor-Associated Neutrophils via the CXCL1/8-CXCR2 Axis. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 25, 2887–2899.
  62. Ijichi, H.; Chytil, A.; Gorska, A.E.; Aakre, M.E.; Bierie, B.; Tada, M.; Mohri, D.; Miyabayashi, K.; Asaoka, Y.; Maeda, S.; et al. Inhibiting Cxcr2 disrupts tumor-stromal interactions and improves survival in a mouse model of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J. Clin. Investig. 2011, 121, 4106–4117.
  63. Fang, W.B.; Mafuvadze, B.; Yao, M.; Zou, A.; Portsche, M.; Cheng, N. TGF-β Negatively Regulates CXCL1 Chemokine Expression in Mammary Fibroblasts through Enhancement of Smad2/3 and Suppression of HGF/c-Met Signaling Mechanisms. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0135063.
  64. Li, X.; Sterling, J.A.; Fan, K.H.; Vessella, R.L.; Shyr, Y.; Hayward, S.W.; Matrisian, L.M.; Bhowmick, N.A. Loss of TGF-β responsiveness in prostate stromal cells alters chemokine levels and facilitates the development of mixed osteoblastic/osteolytic bone lesions. Mol. Cancer Res. 2012, 10, 494–503.
  65. Moser, B.; Clark-Lewis, I.; Zwahlen, R.; Baggiolini, M. Neutrophil-activating properties of the melanoma growth-stimulatory activity. J. Exp. Med. 1990, 171, 1797–1802.
  66. Hurt, B.; Schulick, R.; Edil, B.; El Kasmi, K.C.; Barnett, C., Jr. Cancer-promoting mechanisms of tumor-associated neutrophils. Am. J. Surg. 2017, 214, 938–944.
  67. O’Connor, P.M.; Jackman, J.; Bae, I.; Myers, T.G.; Fan, S.; Mutoh, M.; Scudiero, D.A.; Monks, A.; Sausville, E.A.; Weinstein, J.N.; et al. Characterization of the p53 tumor suppressor pathway in cell lines of the National Cancer Institute anticancer drug screen and correlations with the growth-inhibitory potency of 123 anticancer agents. Cancer Res. 1997, 57, 4285–4300.
  68. Leroy, B.; Girard, L.; Hollestelle, A.; Minna, J.D.; Gazdar, A.F.; Soussi, T. Analysis of TP53 mutation status in human cancer cell lines: A reassessment. Hum. Mutat. 2014, 35, 756–765.
  69. Solomon, H.; Buganim, Y.; Kogan-Sakin, I.; Pomeraniec, L.; Assia, Y.; Madar, S.; Goldstein, I.; Brosh, R.; Kalo, E.; Beatus, T.; et al. Various p53 mutant proteins differently regulate the Ras circuit to induce a cancer-related gene signature. J. Cell Sci. 2012, 125, 3144–3152.
  70. Son, D.S.; Kabir, S.M.; Dong, Y.L.; Lee, E.; Adunyah, S.E. Inhibitory effect of tumor suppressor p53 on proinflammatory chemokine expression in ovarian cancer cells by reducing proteasomal degradation of IκB. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e51116.
  71. Carrà, G.; Lingua, M.F.; Maffeo, B.; Taulli, R.; Morotti, A. P53 vs NF-κB: The role of nuclear factor-kappa B in the regulation of p53 activity and vice versa. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2020, 77, 4449–4458.
  72. Lowe, J.M.; Menendez, D.; Bushel, P.R.; Shatz, M.; Kirk, E.L.; Troester, M.A.; Garantziotis, S.; Fessler, M.B.; Resnick, M.A. p53 and NF-κB coregulate proinflammatory gene responses in human macrophages. Cancer Res. 2014, 74, 2182–2192.
  73. Ignacio, R.M.C.; Dong, Y.L.; Kabir, S.M.; Choi, H.; Lee, E.S.; Wilson, A.J.; Beeghly-Fadiel, A.; Whalen, M.M.; Son, D.S. CXCR2 is a negative regulator of p21 in p53-dependent and independent manner via Akt-mediated Mdm2 in ovarian cancer. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 9751–9765.
  74. Yan, W.; Chen, X. Identification of GRO1 as a critical determinant for mutant p53 gain of function. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 12178–12187.
  75. De Souza, C.; Madden, J.A.; Minn, D.; Kumar, V.E.; Montoya, D.J.; Nambiar, R.; Zhu, Z.; Xiao, W.W.; Tahmassebi, N.; Kathi, H.; et al. The P72R Polymorphism in R248Q/W p53 Mutants Modifies the Mutant Effect on Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition Phenotype and Cell Invasion via CXCL1 Expression. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8025.
  76. Woodstock, D.L.; Sammons, M.A.; Fischer, M. p63 and p53: Collaborative Partners or Dueling Rivals? Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 701986.
  77. Somerville, T.D.; Biffi, G.; Daßler-Plenker, J.; Hur, S.K.; He, X.Y.; Vance, K.E.; Miyabayashi, K.; Xu, Y.; Maia-Silva, D.; Klingbeil, O.; et al. Squamous trans-differentiation of pancreatic cancer cells promotes stromal inflammation. eLife 2020, 9, e53381.
  78. Huh, Y.H.; Lee, G.; Lee, K.B.; Koh, J.T.; Chun, J.S.; Ryu, J.H. HIF-2α-induced chemokines stimulate motility of fibroblast-like synoviocytes and chondrocytes into the cartilage-pannus interface in experimental rheumatoid arthritis mouse models. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2015, 17, 302.
  79. Triner, D.; Xue, X.; Schwartz, A.J.; Jung, I.; Colacino, J.A.; Shah, Y.M. Epithelial Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 2α Facilitates the Progression of Colon Tumors through Recruiting Neutrophils. Mol. Cell Biol. 2017, 37, e00481-16.
  80. Wang, J.; Yu, F.; Jia, X.; Iwanowycz, S.; Wang, Y.; Huang, S.; Ai, W.; Fan, D. MicroRNA-155 deficiency enhances the recruitment and functions of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in tumor microenvironment and promotes solid tumor growth. Int. J. Cancer 2015, 136, E602–E613.
  81. Akhtar, S.; Hartmann, P.; Karshovska, E.; Rinderknecht, F.A.; Subramanian, P.; Gremse, F.; Grommes, J.; Jacobs, M.; Kiessling, F.; Weber, C.; et al. Endothelial Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1α Promotes Atherosclerosis and Monocyte Recruitment by Upregulating MicroRNA-19a. Hypertension 2015, 66, 1220–1226.
  82. Wang, D.; Wang, L.H.; Zhao, Y.; Lu, Y.P.; Zhu, L. Hypoxia regulates the ferrous iron uptake and reactive oxygen species level via divalent metal transporter 1 (DMT1) Exon1B by hypoxia-inducible factor-1. IUBMB Life 2010, 62, 629–636.
  83. Salvi, A.; Thanabalu, T. Expression of N-WASP is regulated by HiF1α through the hypoxia response element in the N-WASP promoter. Biochem. Biophys. Rep. 2016, 9, 13–21.
  84. Ye, L.Y.; Chen, W.; Bai, X.L.; Xu, X.Y.; Zhang, Q.; Xia, X.F.; Sun, X.; Li, G.G.; Hu, Q.D.; Fu, Q.H.; et al. Hypoxia-Induced Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Induces an Immunosuppressive Tumor Microenvironment to Promote Metastasis. Cancer Res. 2016, 76, 818–830.
  85. Huang, G.; Tao, L.; Shen, S.; Chen, L. Hypoxia induced CCL28 promotes angiogenesis in lung adenocarcinoma by targeting CCR3 on endothelial cells. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 27152.
  86. Lo, H.M.; Lai, T.H.; Li, C.H.; Wu, W.B. TNF-α induces CXCL1 chemokine expression and release in human vascular endothelial cells in vitro via two distinct signaling pathways. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2014, 35, 339–350.
  87. Shieh, J.M.; Tsai, Y.J.; Tsou, C.J.; Wu, W.B. CXCL1 regulation in human pulmonary epithelial cells by tumor necrosis factor. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 2014, 34, 1373–1384.
  88. Wang, B.; Khachigian, L.M.; Esau, L.; Birrer, M.J.; Zhao, X.; Parker, M.I.; Hendricks, D.T. A key role for early growth response-1 and nuclear factor-kappaB in mediating and maintaining GRO/CXCR2 proliferative signaling in esophageal cancer. Mol. Cancer Res. 2009, 7, 755–764.
  89. Tkocz, D.; Crawford, N.T.; Buckley, N.E.; Berry, F.B.; Kennedy, R.D.; Gorski, J.J.; Harkin, D.P.; Mullan, P.B. BRCA1 and GATA3 corepress FOXC1 to inhibit the pathogenesis of basal-like breast cancers. Oncogene 2012, 31, 3667–3678.
  90. Karapetsas, A.; Tokamani, M.; Evangelou, C.; Sandaltzopoulos, R. The homeodomain transcription factor MEIS1 triggers chemokine expression and is involved in CD8+ T-lymphocyte infiltration in early stage ovarian cancer. Mol. Carcinog. 2018, 57, 1251–1263.
  91. Botton, T.; Puissant, A.; Cheli, Y.; Tomic, T.; Giuliano, S.; Fajas, L.; Deckert, M.; Ortonne, J.P.; Bertolotto, C.; Tartare-Deckert, S.; et al. Ciglitazone negatively regulates CXCL1 signaling through MITF to suppress melanoma growth. Cell Death Differ. 2011, 18, 109–121.
  92. Hermert, D.; Martin, I.V.; Reiss, L.K.; Liu, X.; Breitkopf, D.M.; Reimer, K.C.; Alidousty, C.; Rauen, T.; Floege, J.; Ostendorf, T.; et al. The nucleic acid binding protein YB-1-controlled expression of CXCL-1 modulates kidney damage in liver fibrosis. Kidney Int. 2020, 97, 741–752.
  93. Georgakopoulos-Soares, I.; Chartoumpekis, D.V.; Kyriazopoulou, V.; Zaravinos, A. EMT Factors and Metabolic Pathways in Cancer. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 499.
  94. Taki, M.; Abiko, K.; Baba, T.; Hamanishi, J.; Yamaguchi, K.; Murakami, R.; Yamanoi, K.; Horikawa, N.; Hosoe, Y.; Nakamura, E.; et al. Snail promotes ovarian cancer progression by recruiting myeloid-derived suppressor cells via CXCR2 ligand upregulation. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1685.
  95. Xiang, Z.; Zhou, Z.J.; Xia, G.K.; Zhang, X.H.; Wei, Z.W.; Zhu, J.T.; Yu, J.; Chen, W.; He, Y.; Schwarz, R.E.; et al. A positive crosstalk between CXCR4 and CXCR2 promotes gastric cancer metastasis. Oncogene 2017, 36, 5122–5133.
  96. Sharma, B.; Nannuru, K.C.; Saxena, S.; Varney, M.L.; Singh, R.K. CXCR2: A Novel Mediator of Mammary Tumor Bone Metastasis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1237.
  97. Heisig, J.; Weber, D.; Englberger, E.; Winkler, A.; Kneitz, S.; Sung, W.K.; Wolf, E.; Eilers, M.; Wei, C.L.; Gessler, M. Target gene analysis by microarrays and chromatin immunoprecipitation identifies HEY proteins as highly redundant bHLH repressors. PLoS Genet. 2012, 8, e1002728.
  98. Han, L.; Korangath, P.; Nguyen, N.K.; Diehl, A.; Cho, S.; Teo, W.W.; Cope, L.; Gessler, M.; Romer, L.; Sukumar, S. HEYL Regulates Neoangiogenesis Through Overexpression in Both Breast Tumor Epithelium and Endothelium. Front. Oncol. 2021, 10, 581459.
  99. Saliba, J.; Coutaud, B.; Solovieva, V.; Lu, F.; Blank, V. Regulation of CXCL1 chemokine and CSF3 cytokine levels in myometrial cells by the MAFF transcription factor. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2019, 23, 2517–2525.
  100. Chan, Y.W.; van den Berg, H.A.; Moore, J.D.; Quenby, S.; Blanks, A.M. Assessment of myometrial transcriptome changes associated with spontaneous human labour by high-throughput RNA-seq. Exp. Physiol. 2014, 99, 510–524.
  101. Zhou, Y.; Zheng, X.; Xu, B.; Deng, H.; Chen, L.; Jiang, J. Histone methyltransferase SETD2 inhibits tumor growth via suppressing CXCL1-mediated activation of cell cycle in lung adenocarcinoma. Aging 2020, 12, 25189–25206.
  102. Al Sarakbi, W.; Sasi, W.; Jiang, W.G.; Roberts, T.; Newbold, R.F.; Mokbel, K. The mRNA expression of SETD2 in human breast cancer: Correlation with clinico-pathological parameters. BMC Cancer 2009, 9, 290.
  103. Patil, V.; Pal, J.; Somasundaram, K. Elucidating the cancer-specific genetic alteration spectrum of glioblastoma derived cell lines from whole exome and RNA sequencing. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 43452–43471.
  104. Lee, M.; Kim, K.; Kim, S.Y.; Jung, S.H.; Yoon, J.; Kim, M.S.; Park, H.C.; Jung, E.S.; Chung, Y.J.; Lee, S.H. Genomic structures of dysplastic nodule and concurrent hepatocellular carcinoma. Hum. Pathol. 2018, 81, 37–46.
  105. Zhang, Y.; Yan, L.; Yao, W.; Chen, K.; Xu, H.; Ye, Z. Integrated Analysis of Genetic Abnormalities of the Histone Lysine Methyltransferases in Prostate Cancer. Med. Sci. Monit. 2019, 25, 193–239.
  106. Shang, Y.; Coppo, M.; He, T.; Ning, F.; Yu, L.; Kang, L.; Zhang, B.; Ju, C.; Qiao, Y.; Zhao, B.; et al. The transcriptional repressor Hes1 attenuates inflammation by regulating transcription elongation. Nat. Immunol. 2016, 17, 930–937.
  107. Hu, X.; Chung, A.Y.; Wu, I.; Foldi, J.; Chen, J.; Ji, J.D.; Tateya, T.; Kang, Y.J.; Han, J.; Gessler, M.; et al. Integrated regulation of Toll-like receptor responses by Notch and interferon-gamma pathways. Immunity 2008, 29, 691–703.
  108. Herjan, T.; Novotny, M.; Hamilton, T.A. Diversity in sequence-dependent control of GRO chemokine mRNA half-life. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2013, 93, 895–904.
  109. Stoeckle, M.Y. Removal of a 3’ non-coding sequence is an initial step in degradation of gro alpha mRNA and is regulated by interleukin-1. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992, 20, 1123–1127.
  110. Stoeckle, M.Y.; Guan, L. High-resolution analysis of gro alpha mRNA poly(A) shortening: Regulation by interleukin-1 beta. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993, 21, 1613–1617.
  111. Zhao, W.; Siegel, D.; Biton, A.; Tonqueze, O.L.; Zaitlen, N.; Ahituv, N.; Erle, D.J. CRISPR-Cas9-mediated functional dissection of 3’-UTRs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, 10800–10810.
  112. Pecot, C.V.; Rupaimoole, R.; Yang, D.; Akbani, R.; Ivan, C.; Lu, C.; Wu, S.; Han, H.D.; Shah, M.Y.; Rodriguez-Aguayo, C.; et al. Tumour angiogenesis regulation by the miR-200 family. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2427.
  113. Lv, M.; Xu, Y.; Tang, R.; Ren, J.; Shen, S.; Chen, Y.; Liu, B.; Hou, Y.; Wang, T. miR141-CXCL1-CXCR2 signaling-induced Treg recruitment regulates metastases and survival of non-small cell lung cancer. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2014, 13, 3152–3162.
  114. Cui, X.; Li, Z.; Gao, J.; Gao, P.J.; Ni, Y.B.; Zhu, J.Y. Elevated CXCL1 increases hepatocellular carcinoma aggressiveness and is inhibited by miRNA-200a. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 65052–65066.
  115. Shrestha, S.; Yang, C.D.; Hong, H.C.; Chou, C.H.; Tai, C.S.; Chiew, M.Y.; Chen, W.L.; Weng, S.L.; Chen, C.C.; Chang, Y.A.; et al. Integrated MicroRNA-mRNA Analysis Reveals miR-204 Inhibits Cell Proliferation in Gastric Cancer by Targeting CKS1B, CXCL1 and GPRC5A. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 19, 87.
  116. Liu, C.H.; Jing, X.N.; Liu, X.L.; Qin, S.Y.; Liu, M.W.; Hou, C.H. Tumor-suppressor miRNA-27b-5p regulates the growth and metastatic behaviors of ovarian carcinoma cells by targeting CXCL1. J. Ovarian Res. 2020, 13, 92.
  117. Chen, B.; Song, L.; Nie, X.; Lin, F.; Yu, Z.; Kong, W.; Qi, X.; Wang, W. CXCL1 Regulated by miR-302e Is Involved in Cell Viability and Motility of Colorectal Cancer via Inhibiting JAK-STAT Signaling Pathway. Front. Oncol. 2021, 10, 577229.
  118. Sun, D.; Novotny, M.; Bulek, K.; Liu, C.; Li, X.; Hamilton, T. Treatment with IL-17 prolongs the half-life of chemokine CXCL1 mRNA via the adaptor TRAF5 and the splicing-regulatory factor SF2 (ASF). Nat. Immunol. 2011, 12, 853–860.
  119. Herjan, T.; Yao, P.; Qian, W.; Li, X.; Liu, C.; Bulek, K.; Sun, D.; Yang, W.P.; Zhu, J.; He, A.; et al. HuR is required for IL-17-induced Act1-mediated CXCL1 and CXCL5 mRNA stabilization. J. Immunol. 2013, 191, 640–649.
  120. Datta, S.; Biswas, R.; Novotny, M.; Pavicic, P.G., Jr.; Herjan, T.; Mandal, P.; Hamilton, T.A. Tristetraprolin regulates CXCL1 (KC) mRNA stability. J. Immunol. 2008, 180, 2545–2552.
  121. Qiu, L.Q.; Lai, W.S.; Bradbury, A.; Zeldin, D.C.; Blackshear, P.J. Tristetraprolin (TTP) coordinately regulates primary and secondary cellular responses to proinflammatory stimuli. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2015, 97, 723–736.
  122. Smallie, T.; Ross, E.A.; Ammit, A.J.; Cunliffe, H.E.; Tang, T.; Rosner, D.R.; Ridley, M.L.; Buckley, C.D.; Saklatvala, J.; Dean, J.L.; et al. Dual-Specificity Phosphatase 1 and Tristetraprolin Cooperate To Regulate Macrophage Responses to Lipopolysaccharide. J. Immunol. 2015, 195, 277–288.
  123. Clement, S.L.; Scheckel, C.; Stoecklin, G.; Lykke-Andersen, J. Phosphorylation of tristetraprolin by MK2 impairs AU-rich element mRNA decay by preventing deadenylase recruitment. Mol. Cell Biol. 2011, 31, 256–266.
  124. Lian, S.; Zhai, X.; Wang, X.; Zhu, H.; Zhang, S.; Wang, W.; Wang, Z.; Huang, J. Elevated expression of growth-regulated oncogene-alpha in tumor and stromal cells predicts unfavorable prognosis in pancreatic cancer. Medicine 2016, 95, e4328.
  125. Wang, L.; Zhang, C.; Xu, J.; Wu, H.; Peng, J.; Cai, S.; He, Y. CXCL1 gene silencing inhibits HGC803 cell migration and invasion and acts as an independent prognostic factor for poor survival in gastric cancer. Mol. Med. Rep. 2016, 14, 4673–4679.
  126. Kronski, E.; Fiori, M.E.; Barbieri, O.; Astigiano, S.; Mirisola, V.; Killian, P.H.; Bruno, A.; Pagani, A.; Rovera, F.; Pfeffer, U.; et al. miR181b is induced by the chemopreventive polyphenol curcumin and inhibits breast cancer metastasis via down-regulation of the inflammatory cytokines CXCL1 and -2. Mol. Oncol. 2014, 8, 581–595.
  127. Naito, Y.; Yamamoto, Y.; Sakamoto, N.; Shimomura, I.; Kogure, A.; Kumazaki, M.; Yokoi, A.; Yashiro, M.; Kiyono, T.; Yanagihara, K.; et al. Cancer extracellular vesicles contribute to stromal heterogeneity by inducing chemokines in cancer-associa.a.a.ated fibroblasts. Oncogene 2019, 38, 5566–5579.
  128. Leng, J.; Liu, W.; Li, L.; Wei, F.Y.; Tian, M.; Liu, H.M.; Guo, W. MicroRNA-429/Cxcl1 Axis Protective Against Oxygen Glucose Deprivation/Reoxygenation-Induced Injury in Brain Microvascular Endothelial Cells. Dose Response 2020, 18, 1559325820913785.
  129. Shi, Y.; Yi, Z.; Zhao, P.; Xu, Y.; Pan, P. MicroRNA-532-5p protects against cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury by directly targeting CXCL1. Aging 2021, 13, 11528–11541.
  130. Du, Z.; Wu, T.; Liu, L.; Luo, B.; Wei, C. Extracellular vesicles-derived miR-150-5p secreted by adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells inhibits CXCL1 expression to attenuate hepatic fibrosis. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2021, 25, 701–715.
  131. Yoo, J.K.; Jung, H.Y.; Kim, C.H.; Son, W.S.; Kim, J.K. miR-7641 modulates the expression of CXCL1 during endothelial differentiation derived from human embryonic stem cells. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2013, 36, 353–358.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!
Academic Video Service
Feedback