Child Labour in Developing Countries during Pandemics: History
View Latest Version
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Subjects: Social Issues
Contributor:
Polyxeni Kechagia

Child labour refers to minors aged 5–11 engaged in any economic activity or at least 28 h of domestic activities, minors aged 12–14 engaged in any economic activity, excluding light work for no more than 14 h weekly and minors aged 15–16 engaged in any hazardous work. Child labour includes activities that deprive minors of their childhood, potential and dignity and could negatively affect their mental and physical development.

  • child labour
  • developing countries
  • pandemics
  • epidemics
  • COVID-19

1. Introduction

Lockdowns during pandemics increase the reported cases of child abuse and neglect and the loss of parental support worldwide ( Douglas et al. 2009[1] ; Jentsch and Schnock 2020[2] ; Rodriguez et al. 2021 [3]). Nevertheless, during pandemics, the social protection of children has been judged as inadequate, as in the case of the H1N1 flu ( Douglas et al. 2009[1] ; Murray 2010[4] ). In general, pandemics create conditions under which the maltreatment, abuse and neglect of children are enabled ( Rodriguez et al. 2021[3] ).

The COVID-19 pandemic has attracted research interest over the past few months that has mostly focused on its socio-economic consequences worldwide ( Aneja and Ahuja 2020[5] ; Ali et al. 2020[6] ; Nicola et al. 2020 [7]). It has been estimated that COVID-19 will mainly affect the well-being of vulnerable groups, including children ( Armitage and Nellums 2020[8] ). The UN Committee of the Rights of the Child highlighted the importance of investigating the impact of the recent pandemic on children’s human rights, including health issues, their well-being and development, as well as the problem of child labour ( Campbell et al. 2021[9] ; Lee 2021[10] ). Therefore, the estimated effects of COVID-19 on child labour merit attention and this should be a top research priority considering the vulnerability of minors to child labour. In particular, according to Zahed et al. ( 2020)[11] the case of children when investigating the consequences of COVID-19 is often neglected, even though they are a vulnerable social group. Apart from the psychological and physical consequences of COVID-19, the researchers concluded that working children are more susceptible to the infection and that the pandemic has increased poverty, which is a contributing factor to child labour.

The recent pandemic is expected to increase the risks for vulnerable social groups including children and it could lead to higher rates of child labour, exploitation, forced labour and slavery ( Ahad et al. 2020[12] ; Rafferty 2020[13] ; Raman et al. 2020[13] ). These findings are in line with Gupta and Jawanda ( 2020)[14], who argued that the pandemic will increase economic insecurity and child exploitation, including child labour, mainly in poor regions. Similarly, the pandemic is expected to lead to an economic crisis and to increase child poverty, which is a determinant of child labour ( Goldman et al. 2020[15] ; Van Lancker and Parolin 2020[16] ). Ghosh et al. ( 2020a )[17] also argued that the recent pandemic has had a significant psychological impact on children. According to the researchers, COVID-19 is expected to increase child abuse and domestic violence, as well as child labour and exploitation.

The impact of previous pandemics (e.g., Ebola, SARS, HIV/AIDS, H1N1, Influenza) on the well-being of minors has been the subject of previous studies ( Holmberg 2017[18] ; Shelley-Egan and Dratwa 2019[19] ). Nevertheless, the economic exploitation of children during health crises, including the COVID-19 pandemic, remains under investigated.

2. Definition of Child Labour

The past decades have witnessed various efforts by international and local organizations in the fight against the phenomenon of child labour. The present research focuses on minor employees in developing countries and argues that they have higher rates of child labour ( Scanlon et al. 2002[20] ), including contributing family workers ( Diallo et al. 2013 [21]). Child labour includes the violation of the human rights of minors and it is associated with various harmful activities ( Edmonds and Pavcnik 2005[22] ). Several definitions of child labour have been presented to date, ranging from wage work for minors ( Psacharopoulos 1997 [23]) and various forms of market work ( Ray and Lancaster 2005[24] ) to domestic activities ( Basu et al. 2010[25] ; Assaad et al. 2010[26] ). These findings are in line with Levison and Moe[27] ( 1998) and [28]Webbink et al. ( 2012), who also defined domestic activities as a “hidden” form of child labour. According to Basu ( 1999)[29], child labour could be either paid or not paid and it is associated with domestic activities.

Similarly, according to the ILO/IPEC ( 2021)[30], child labour should not be confused with child work. In particular, child labour includes activities that deprive minors of their childhood, potential and dignity and could negatively affect their mental and physical development; it is therefore harmful to minors. Based on the ILO Minimum Age Convention ( ILO 1973[31], No. 138 ), minors should be older than 15 to legally participate in the labour force ( ILO 1973[31] ). UNICEF has further extended the above presented definitions and focuses on the importance of both domestic and economic work. In particular, child labour refers to minors aged 5–11 engaged in any economic activity or at least 28 h of domestic activities, minors aged 12–14 engaged in any economic activity, excluding light work for no more than 14 h weekly and minors aged 15–16 engaged in any hazardous work ( UNICEF 2007[32] ). Therefore, it is concluded that there is no single universally accepted definition of the phenomenon. Finally, the ILO/IPEC ( 2021)[30] observed that in order to define “work” as child labour several factors should be considered, including the age, the hours and the type of work, the working conditions and the objectives.

Several international organizations provide country-level data on child labour, including the ILO, the World Bank, the United Nations and UNICEF, as well as child labour indicators (e.g., ILO’s indicator on the Proportion and Number of Children aged 5–17 years engaged in Child Labour, UNICEF’s indicator on the Percentage of Children aged 5–17 years engaged in Child Labour and so on), while certain previous studies have used the secondary school non-enrollment rates as a proxy for child labour ( Kucera 2002[33] ; Busse and Braun 2004[34] ; Braun 2006[35] ; Beegle et al. 2009[36] ), although several minor employees go to school and it is argued that school enrolment and child labour are not incompatible activities; therefore, combining child labour and school enrolment is feasible but difficult ( Ravallion and Wodon 2000[37] ; Attanasio et al. 2010[38] ; Edmonds and Shrestha 2014[39] ).

Finally, as for the regional distribution of child labour, according to the United Nations, rates are higher in the Sub-Saharan economies ( Figure 1 ). The problem has been mainly attributed to high poverty rates in the region ( Canagarajah and Nielsen 2001[40] ; Admassie 2002[41] ; Chukwudeh and Oduaran 2021[42] ), poor school quality ( Ray 2002[24] ; Rena 2009[43] ) and social conditions in post-war African countries ( [44]Hilson 2010 ; Maconachie and Hilson 2016[45] ). Similarly, for the period 2010–2018, the Sub-Saharan African countries had the highest percentage of children aged 5–17 engaged in child labour, estimated at 29% ( UNICEF 2019a ).

Socsci 10 00321 g001 550
Figure 1. Share of children aged 5–17 years engaged in labour (2017). Source: United Nations Statistics Division (2021).

3. Studies on Child Labour and Previous Non-COVID-19 Pandemics in Developing Countries

Child labour is considered a visible and the most common form of child abuse and neglect in developing countries ( Caesar-Leo 1999[46] ; Maruf et al. 2003[47] ; Mahmod et al. 2016[48] ) and based on the above, the present research focuses on the association between child labour and the pandemics in the developing countries, including the COVID-19 pandemic. In several developing countries, pandemics push minors into the labour markets ( Grier 2004[49] ; Deb 2005[50] ). It was conducted using reliable databases, (e.g., Sciencedirect, Scopus, Google Scholar, NCBI and so on). The key terms used during the research were “child labor”, “child labour”, “epidemic”, “pandemic”, as presented in Table 1 . It is noted that scientific peer-journal articles were included that were published in English and that focused on developing countries, as well as reports from international organizations, such as the UNICEF, the ILO and so on. Thus, books and conference proceedings were excluded.

Table 1. Terms and variations of the database research.
Keyword(s) Synonym or Variations
Child labour Child labor, minor employees, working children, child labor force, child labourer, child laborer, employment of children, labour of children
Pandemic Epidemic, contagious diseases, Ebola, SARS, HIV/AIDS
Developing countries Developing economies, low-and-middle income countries, emerging economies, emerging countries, developing nations, Third World

It could be argued that previous pandemics in developing economies exacerbated the existing issues of child exploitation and labour, while gendered responsibilities were observed. Moreover, previous studies focused on paid child labour and it is argued that non-paid work could be characterised as invisible and difficult to estimate. Among the above presented studies, Sorsa and Abera ( 2016)[51] were the first to study child labour and malaria as a type of pandemic. However, their study did not focus exclusively on the association between the two variables, but mainly on children that worked in regions in which malaria was endemic. Lugalla and Sigalla ( 2010)[52] argued that in Tanzania there was little awareness of working children, mainly in rural areas. They suggested that the government and international organizations should cooperate to reduce rural poverty and therefore eliminate child labour.

Furthermore, among the included studies, it was observed that the African economies, in which child labour rates are high, have attracted increased research interest ( Canagarajah and Nielsen 2001[40] ; Maconachie and Hilson 2016[45] ). Certain studies and reports (e.g., Save the Children/UNICEF/World Vision/Plan International 2015 [53]; Ngegba and Mansaray 2016[54] ; Yoder-van den Brink 2019[55] ; Smith 2020[56] ) studied the impact of pandemics on child labour in post -war countries, as in the case of Sierra Leone. It was concluded that pandemics could deter the so-called crisis of youth in Sierra Leone and it was argued that several minors end up in informal or unskilled labour ( Peters 2011[57] ; Maconachie and Hilson 2016[45] ).

To summarise, there is evidence to support the claim that there is an important research gap on child labour in Latin America during pandemics, which should be confronted since minor employees remain a major social issue in the region. It is interesting that several Latin American countries were affected by pandemics over the past decades, including the outbreak of cholera in the ‘90s ( Kumate et al. 1998[58] ; Poirier et al. 2012[59] ), which affected other countries with high rates of child labour, such as Brazil, Bolivia and Venezuela ( Psacharopoulos 1997[23] ; Silva et al. 2019[60] ; Costa et al. 2020[61] ). Therefore, the present study concludes that there is a research gap regarding child labour and pandemics in the region.

4. Studies on COVID-19 and Child Labour in Developing Countries

Based on the above presented procedure, the additional terms “COVID-19” and “SARS-COV-2” were included as keywords. Therefore, the keywords used in the analysis were: “child labor”, “child labour”, “epidemic”, “pandemic”, “COVID-19” and “SARS-COV-2”. The results of the final search are presented in Table 2 .

Table 2. Studies on child labour and COVID-19 (developing countries).
Author(s) Case Sample Methodology Results and Suggestions
Chopra (2020) COVID-19 India Literature review Child protection services in the country are not fully functional. Children in the country, mainly street and abandoned children, receive limited support, which increases the risks of child abuse and labour.
Greenbaum et al. (2020) COVID-19 Not defined Literature review The recent pandemic could increase human trafficking and labour exploitation. Minors are more likely to engage in hazardous or illegal activities and work in unhealthy working conditions.
Larmar et al. (2020) COVID-19 Nepal Literature review Recovery programs should be applied in the country in order to build capacity and strengthen cooperation among social workers, non-governmental organizations, health professionals and community-based organizations.
Owusu and Frimpong-Manso (2020) COVID-19 Ghana Literature review The COVID-19 pandemic is expected to have severe socioeconomic consequences, mainly for poor families. As a result, poor children are more likely to be left homeless and be forced to work.
Progga et al. (2020) COVID-19 Bangladesh Literature review Child labour should be effectively detected and prevented. A dataset on child labour would be an effective solution in Bangladesh and in other countries of the region, including India, Nepal and Pakistan.
Nguyen et al. (2020) COVID-19 Vietnam Literature review It is estimated that the pandemic could lead to severe socioeconomic problems, including increased exploitation and child labour, higher dropout rates and malnutrition.
Ramaswamy and Seshadri (2020) COVID-19 India Literature review Lockdown during the recent pandemic and the arising economic issues are expected to increase child abuse, trafficking and maltreatment, including child labour. The study concluded that attention should be paid to the likely psychosocial and mental health issues for children as a result of the pandemic.
ILO/UNICEF (2020) COVID-19 Not defined Literature review The research concluded that the recent pandemic could affect child labour through reducing employment opportunities, living standards, remittances and migration and international aid flows. Additional channels that could influence child labour were increased informal child labour, reduced Foreign Direct Investment and school closures.
The World Bank Group (2020) COVID-19 Not defined Literature review The COVID-19 pandemic will lead to a shock to education, resulting in higher dropout rates, which are linked to higher rates of child labour.
United Nations/DESA (2020) COVID-19 Not defined Literature review School closures as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic are associated with higher child labour rates and maltreatment.
Kaur and Byard (2021) COVID-19 India Literature review The potential consequences of COVID-19 include an economic crisis, which would mainly affect children. India has severe gaps in the protection services and therefore minors are more vulnerable to child labour and exploitation.
Sserwanja et al. (2021) COVID-19 Uganda Literature review The pandemic had a significant negative impact on the children’s health status and food care. The country has insufficient social support systems which rendered children even more vulnerable to child abuse, including child labour and limited financial support.
Daly et al. (2021) COVID-19 Nepal Literature review Nepalese children are more vulnerable to poverty, poor health, including COVID-19 contamination and educational exclusion.
Pattanaik (2021) COVID-19 India Literature review The study concludes that the COVID-19 pandemic is expected to have a significant negative impact on the country’s economy and on the labour market imperfections, leading to higher child labour rates.

The studies lead to the common argument that the COVID-19 pandemic is likely to lead to an employment crisis in developing countries, which will lead to higher percentages of child labour. As for the methodological approach, it was observed that all of the included papers were based on a literature review and on secondary data. Except for the study of Greenbaum et al. ( 2020)[66], the researchers focused on the cases of specific countries rather than on a group of countries. The case of India was dominant and it has been studied by four researchers to date, who were motivated by the increased demand for cheap labour force in the country and high poverty rates in the country ( Kaur and Byard 2021[67] ). On the contrary, Sserwanja et al. ( 2021)[67] focused on the case of Uganda, which was motivated by the increase in children abuse incidents in the county during the pandemic.

In particular, the majority of the above presented studies turned their orientation towards child labour and COVID-19 in the Asian developing countries. Therefore, it is observed that to date there is no published research regarding the case of the Latin American and the Caribbean countries, while there is decreasing research interest in the African developing countries compared to previous pandemics and health crises. This could be attributed to the characteristics of several Asian countries that render children more vulnerable to the disease, including population density, poor health systems and insufficient testing, which led to research interest in COVID-19 and its consequences to the region ( Sarkar et al. 2020[67] ; Stone 2020[67] ; Alam 2021[67] ).

Finally, the reports of international organizations on child labour and COVID-19 (e.g., ILO/UNICEF 2020[9] ; United Nations/DESA 2020[11] ; The World Bank Group 2020[10] ) reached the common conclusion that the current pandemic could reverse the positive trends and increase child labour worldwide. This rise is attributed to the disruption in supply chains and to higher commodity prices. School closures, dropout rates, limited employment opportunities, failing living standards and trading activity in the post-COVID-19 period are listed among the channels of child labour during the pandemic. It is noted that Ghosh et al. ( 2020a )[17] also concluded that COVID-19 is expected to increase child labour; nevertheless, their research did not focus on developing countries and thus the study was excluded from the above presented table.

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/socsci10090321

References

  1. Douglas, Pamela K., David B. Douglas, Daniel C. Harrigan, and Kathleen M. Douglas. 2009. Preparing for pandemic influenza and its aftermath: Mental health issues considered. International Journal of Emergence Mental Health 11: 137–44. [Google Scholar]
  2. Jentsch, Birgit, and Brigitte Schnock. 2020. Child welfare in the midst of the coronavirus pandemic—Emerging evidence from Germany. Child Abuse and Neglect 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Rodriguez, Christina M., Shawna J. Lee, Kaitlin P. Ward, and Doris F. Fu. 2021. The perfect storm: Hidden risk of child maltreatment during the Covid-19 Pandemic. Child Maltreatment 26: 139–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Murray, Colonel J. 2010. A collaborative approach to meeting the psychosocial needs of children during an influenza pandemic. Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing 15: 135–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Aneja, Ranjan, and Vaishali Ahuja. 2020. An assessment of socioeconomic impact of COVID-19 pandemic in India. Journal of Public Affairs 21: e2266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ali, Amjad, Mumtaz Ahmed, and Nazia Hassan. 2020. Socioeconomic impact of COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from rural mountain community in Pakistan. Journal of Public Affairs 4: e2355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nicola, Maria, Zaid Alsafi, Catrin Sohrabi, Ahmed Kerwan, Ahmed Al-Jabir, Christos Iosifidis, Maliha Agha, and Riaz Agha. 2020. The socio-economic implications of the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19): A review. International Journal of Surgery 78: 185–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Armitage, Richard, and Laura B. Nellums. 2020. COVID-19: Compounding the health—Related harms of human trafficking. EClinicalMedicine 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Campbell, Sydney, Carlo Cicero Oneto, Manav Preet Singh Saini, Nona Attaran, Nora Makansi, Raissa Passos Dos Santos, Shilni Pukuma, and Franco A. Carnevale. 2021. Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on children: An ethical analysis with a global-child lens. Global Studies of Childhood 11: 105–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lee, Seoyeon. 2021. An exploratory study on COVID-19 and the Rights of Children based on Keyword Network Analysis. Research Square. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zahed, Ghazal, Newsha Chehrehrazi, and Abouzar Nouri Talemi. 2020. How does COVID-19 affect child labor? Archives of Pediatric Infectious Diseases 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ahad, Abdul, Yvonne Parry, and Eileen Willis. 2020. Spillover trends of child labor during the Coronavirus crisis—An unnoticed wake-up call. Frontiers in Public Health 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rafferty, Yvonne. 2020. Promoting the welfare, protection and care of victims of child trafficking during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Journal of Children’s Services 15: 191–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gupta, Sonia, and Manveen K. Jawanda. 2020. The impacts of COVID-19 on children. Acta Paediatrica 109: 2181–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Goldman, Philip S., Marinus H. van Ijzendoorn, and Edmund J. Sonuga-Barke. 2020. The implications of COVID-19 for the care of children living in residential institutions. Lancet Child Adolescent Health 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Van Lancker, Wim, and Zachary Parolin. 2020. COVID-19, school closures, and child poverty: A social crisis in the making. Lancet Public Health 5: 243–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ghosh, Debajyoti, Jonathan A. Bernstein, and Tesfaye Mersha. 2020a. COVID-19 pandemic: The African paradox. Journal of Global Health 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Holmberg, Martin. 2017. The ghost of pandemics past: Revisiting two centuries of influenza in Sweden. Medical Humanities 43: 141–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Shelley-Egan, Clare, and Jim Dratwa. 2019. Marginalization, Ebola and Health for All: From outbreak to lessons learned. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16: 3023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Scanlon, Thomas J., Vivien Prior, Maria Luiza N. Lamarao, and Margaret A. Lynch. 2002. Child Labour. BMJ 325: 401–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Diallo, Yacouba, Alex Etienne, and Farhad Mehran. 2013. Global Child Labour Trends 2008 to 2012, ILO, International Programme on the Elimination of Child Labour (IPEC). Available online: file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/Global_Child_Labour_Trends_2008-2012_EN_Web%20(1).pdf (accessed on 7 July 2021).
  22. Edmonds, Eric. V., and Nina Pavcnik. 2005. Child labor in the global economy. Journal of Economic Perspectives 19: 199–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Psacharopoulos, George. 1997. Child Labor versus Educational Attainment. Some evidence from Latin America. Journal of Population Economics 10: 377–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ray, Ranjan, and Geoffrey Lancaster. 2005. The impact of children’s work on schooling: Multi-country evidence. International Labour Review 144: 189–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Basu, Kaushik, Sanghamitra Das, and Bhaskar Dutta. 2010. Child labor and household wealth: Theory and empirical evidence of an invented-U. Journal of Development Economics 91: 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Assaad, Ragui, Deborah Levison, and Nadia Zibani. 2010. The effect of domestic work on girls’ schooling: Evidence from Egypt. Feminist Economics 16: 79–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Levison, Deborah, and Karine Moe. 1998. Household work as a deterrent to schooling: An analysis of adolescent girls in Peru. The Journal of Developing Areas 32: 339–56. [Google Scholar]
  28. Webbink, Ellen, Jeroen Smits, and Eelke de Jong. 2012. Hidden child labor: Determinants of housework and family business work of children in 16 developing countries. World Development 40: 631–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Basu, Kaushik. 1999. Child labor: Causes, consequenses and cure, with remarks on International Labor Standards. Journal of Economic Literature 37: 1083–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. ILO/IPEC. 2021. What Is Child Labor. Defining Child Labor. Available online: https://www.ilo.org/ipec/facts/lang--en/index.htm (accessed on 7 July 2021).
  31. ILO. 1973. C138—Minimum Age Convention. Available online: https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_ilo_code:C138 (accessed on 7 July 2021).
  32. UNICEF. 2007. Child Labour, Education and Policy Options. Available online: https://www.unicef.org/Child_Labor_Education_and_Policy_Options.pdf (accessed on 7 July 2021).
  33. Kucera, David. 2002. Core Labour Standards and Foreign Direct Investment. International Labour Review 141: 31–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Busse, Matthias, and Sebastian Braun. 2004. Export structure, FDI and child labor. Journal of Economic Integration 19: 804–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Braun, Sebastian. 2006. Core Labour Standards and FDI: Friends or foes? The Case of Child Labour. Review of World Economics 142: 765–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Beegle, Kathleen, Rajeev Dehejia, and Roberta Gatti. 2009. Why Should we Care about Child Labor? The Education, Labor Market and Health Consequences of Child Labor. The Journal of Human Resources 44: 871–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ravallion, Martin, and Quentin Wodon. 2000. Does child labour displace schooling? Evidence on behavioural responses to an enrollment subsidy. The Economic Journal 110: 158–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Attanasio, Orazio, Emla Fitzsimons, Ana Gomez, Diana Lopez, Costas Meghir, and Alice Mesnard. 2010. Child education and work choices in the presence of a conditional cash transfer programme in rural Colombia. Economic Development and Cultural Change 58: 181–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Edmonds, Eric V., and Maheshwor Shrestha. 2014. You get what you pay for: Schooling incentives and child labor. Journal of Development Economics 111: 196–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Canagarajah, Sudharshan, and Helena S. Nielsen. 2001. Child Labor in Africa: A Comparative Study. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 575: 71–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Admassie, Assefa. 2002. Exploring the High Incidence of Child Labor in Sub—Saharan Africa. Africa Development Review 14: 251–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chukwudeh, Okechukwu, and Akpovire Oduaran. 2021. Liminality and child labour: Experiences of school aged working children with implications for community education in Africa. Social Sciences 10: 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Rena, Ravinder. 2009. The Child Labor in Developing Countries: A Challenge to Millennium Development Goals. Indus Journal of Management and Social Science 3: 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  44. Hilson, Gavin. 2010. Child Labour in African Artisanal Mining Communities: Experiences from Northern Ghana. Development and Change 41: 445–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Maconachie, Roy, and Gavin Hilson. 2016. Re-thinking the Child Labor “problem” in Rural Sub-Saharan Africa: The Case of Sierra Leone’s Half Shovels. World Development 78: 136–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Caesar-Leo, Michaela. 1999. Child labour: The most visible type of child abuse and neglect in India. Child Abuse Review 8: 75–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Maruf, Aberra, Michael W. Kifle, and Lemma Indrias. 2003. Child labor and associated problems in rural town in South West Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Health Development 17: 45–52. [Google Scholar]
  48. Mahmod, Nik Ahmad Kamal Nik, Marhanum Che Mohd Salleh, Ashgar Ali Muhammad, and Azizah Mohd. 2016. A study on child labour as a form of child abuse in Malaysia. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity 6: 525–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Grier, Beverly. 2004. Child labor and Africanist scholarship: A critical review. African Studies Review 47: 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Deb, Sibnath. 2005. Child abuse and neglect in a metropolitan city: A qualitative study of migrant child labour in Soutrh Kolkata. Social Change 35: 56–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sorsa, Solomon, and Alemu Abera. 2016. A study on child labor in three major towns of southern Ethiopia. The Ethiopian Journal of Health Development 20: 136–205. [Google Scholar]
  52. Lugalla, Joe L., and Huruma L. Sigalla. 2010. Child labour in the Era of HIV/AIDS in Sub-Saharan Africa: A case study of Tanzania. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie 35: 8–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Save the Children/UNICEF/World Vision/Plan International. 2015. Children’s Ebola Recovery Assessment: Sierra Leone. Available online: https://www.savethechildren.org/content/dam/global/reports/emergency-humanitarian-response/ebola-rec-sierraleone.pdf (accessed on 7 July 2021).
  54. Nguyen, Huong T. T., Tham T. Nguyen, Vu A. T. Dam, Long H. Nguyen, Giang T. Vu, Huong L. T. Nguyen, Hien T. Nguyen, and Huong T. Le. 2020. COVID-19 employment crisis in Vietnam: Global issue, National solutions. Frontiers in Public Health 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Yoder-van den Brink, Hélène. 2019. Reflections on “Building Back Better” child and adolescent mental health care in a low-resource postemergency setting: The case of Sierra Leone. Frontiers in Psychiatry 10: 758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Smith, William C. 2020. Potential long-term consequences of school closures: Lessons from the 2013–2016 Ebola pandemic. Research Square. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Peters, Krijn. 2011. The crisis of youth in postwar Sierra Leone: Problem Solved? Africa Today 58: 128–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kumate, Jesús, Jaime Sepulveda, and Gonzalo Gultierrez. 1998. Cholera epidemiology in Latin America and perspectives for eradication. Bulletin de l’ Institut Pasteur 94: 217–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Poirier, Mathieu J., Ricardo Izurieta, Sharad S. Malavade, and Michael D. McDonald. 2012. Re-emergence of cholera in the Americas: Risks, susceptibility, and ecology. Journal of Global Infectious Diseases 4: 162–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Silva, Gisella Christina, Jorge Alberto Iriart, Sônia Christina Lima Chaves, and Erik Ashley Abade. 2019. Characteristics of research on child labor in Latin America. Cadernos de Saúde Publica 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Costa, Gabriel W., André Carraro, Felipe. G. Ribeiro, and Mariane F. Borba. 2020. The Impact of Child Labor Eradication Programs in Brazil. The Journal of Developing Areas 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Greenbaum, Jordan, Hanni Stoklosa, and Laura Murphy. 2020. The public health impact of coronavirus disease on human trafficking. Frontiers in Public Health 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kaur, Navpreet, and Roger W. Byard. 2021. Prevalence and potential consequences of child labour in India and the possible impact of COVID-19—A contemporary overview. Medicine Science and the Law. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Sserwanja, Quraish, Joseph Kawuki, and Jean Kim. 2021. Increased child abuse in Uganda amidst COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health 57: 188–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Sarkar, Amitabha, Guangqi Liu, Yinzi Jin, Zheng Xie, and Zhi-Jie Zheng. 2020. Public health preparedness and responses to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in South Asia: A situation and policy analysis. Global Health Journal 4: 121–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Stone, Rupert. 2020. COVID-19 in South Asia: Mirror and catalyst. Asian Affaires 51: 542–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Alam, Zakiul M. 2021. Is population density a risk factor for communicable diseases like COVID-19? A case of Bangladesh. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health 6: 1010539521998858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!
ScholarVision Creations
Feedback