Worldwide, roughly 100 million people have been infected with HCV (i.e., anti-HCV positive) at an annual incidence of 3–4 million/year, along with an estimated 71 million people thought to have CHC (i.e., HCV RNA positive)
[1][3]. The prevalence of HCV varies greatly from region to region, with the eastern Mediterranean region having the highest prevalence, at 2.3%, and the western Pacific region having the lowest prevalence, at 0.5%
[1]. In contrast to the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendations for universal HCV screening of all asymptomatic adults aged 18 to 79 years, countries with limited resources to HCV screening are at increased risk of sequelae from undiagnosed CHC due to the delays in diagnosis and receiving care. Additionally, data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which has tracked the incidence of acute HCV in the US since 1982, show that while acute infections in the US have decreased from the peak in 1989 to a nadir in 2010, there has been a disturbing trend of increasing cases since 2010
[1]. For example, the CDC estimates there has been a 4-fold increase in cases from 2010 to 2017: from roughly 11,800 cases of acute HCV in 2010 to 44,700 cases in 2017
[1]. The increase in cases has been linked to an ongoing opioid epidemic in the US, as persons who inject drugs (PWID) were found to have a much higher incidence of HCV infection, especially young adults
[4][5]. The increased incidence and prevalence among PWID is not limited to the US, as shown in a systemic review that estimated that 52.3% of PWID have been exposed to HCV based on anti-HCV antibodies
[6]. Data on the prevalence of HCV by HCV RNA was lacking in most countries, but of the countries that provided data, the lowest prevalence was noted in sub-Saharan Africa among PWID, and this was still listed at roughly 21.8%
[6]. As more developing countries report data on PWID, it is apparent that this is a very high-risk group for CHC around the world.
The treatment of CHC has changed drastically within the last decade with the advent of DAAs, leading to a significant reduction in the use of ribavirin and an almost complete discontinuation of interferon. The vast majority of patients are treated with the newest DAA regimens, which are well tolerated and allow patients to achieve sustained virologic response (SVR) in excess of 98%
[7]. Although management of CHC has become easier than ever before, there are still several considerations that highlight the utility of HCV prevention. For instance, increased usage of DAA therapy can lead to the development of viral resistance to current regimens, especially as resistance to treatment regimens has been documented during clinical trials
[8]. Furthermore, liver disease can progress in a subset of patients, and some patients are still at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) even with cure of CHC
[9][10][11][12]. In addition, the specter of reinfection continues to follow those patients who are still deemed at high-risk for HCV infections, such as PWID, as treatment with DAAs has not been shown to give lasting immunity to HCV
[13][14]. Access to treatment is another barrier to curative therapy
[15]; several reports attest to the inability of patients to get treatment covered by public or private insurances in the US
[15][16].
Given the current clinical burden of HCV infections, the World Health Organization’s (WHO) goal of a 90% reduction of HCV infections by 2030 is in jeopardy of not being achieved
[1]. Therefore prevention, via vaccination, would be an ideal alternative to treatment in order to achieve this goal. Indeed, mathematical models have shown that a vaccine with even as little as 30% efficacy would still reduce the clinical burden of disease significantly
[17][18][19][20].