You're using an outdated browser. Please upgrade to a modern browser for the best experience.
Physical Activity in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: History
View Latest Version
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Subjects: Sport Sciences
Contributor: Christian Von Loeffelholz

The term nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) was defined in the 1980s to describe exceeding hepatocellular triacylglycerol accumulation in absence of significant alcohol intake, viral and autoimmune liver disease. The course of NAFLD was long thought to follow the so-called “two hit hypothesis. Manifestation of bland steatosis (nonalcoholic fatty liver, NAFL) was defined as first hit, while signs of liver inflammation, hepatocyte injury and fibrosis, becoming evident in varying percentages of patients, were proposed as succeeding second hit. Presence of these pathologies can be evaluated histologically, using defined staging and grading systems, and is termed then nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Steatosis can alternatively be evaluated by noninvasive approaches.

  • insulin resistance
  • type 2 diabetes
  • nonexercise activity thermogenesis
  • AMP activated protein kinase

1. Insulin Resistance as Trigger Event for NAFLD Onset, Progression, and Clinical Course

NAFLD is recognized as a heterogenous disease, with disparate and complex causes of liver dysfunction [1]. Various maladaptations along with genetic influences are thought to be responsible for NAFLD onset and progression. The disease is therefore increasingly termed metabolic dysfunction associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) [1]. Chronic subclinical inflammation and IR are considered as most significant molecular drivers of NAFLD/MAFLD progression [2][3][4]. Due to the potential risk of leading to liver fibrosis/cirrhosis this can determine patient prognosis [5][6][7][8][9][10]. NAFLD/MAFLD is related to renal and cardiovascular disease, whereby obesity and T2D are delineated as main pathologies linking NAFLD/MAFLD with long term sequelae [11][12][13][14][15][16]. Furthermore, metabolic fatty liver disease is a predictor of colorectal adenoma, related to the incidence of various malignancies, and in particular to the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [8][9][17][18][19]. In the US, metabolic fatty liver disease is currently the second leading etiology of HCC-related liver transplantation and patients undergoing major surgery have more perioperative complications and longer hospital stay. After transplantation there is a significant risk of de novo T2D and NAFLD/MAFLD, and furthermore of premature death from cardiovascular complications and sepsis [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. Together, MAFLD/NAFLD has to be considered a multisystem disease, as hepatic manifestation of the metabolic syndrome (MeSy)/T2D and can influence patient prognosis [26][28][29].
IR is the early pathophysiologic trigger event in the overnutrition-MeSy-T2D spectrum ([30]; reviewed in [31]). IR is closely related to ectopic lipid deposition, whereby liver fat is recognized as central predictor of whole-body insulin sensitivity, or reciprocally IR under human in vivo conditions [2][30][31][32][33]. The metabolic condition of skeletal muscle, the organ system most evidently impacted by physical exercise, was recently found to be influenced by liver lipid status in a dose dependent fashion [33]. Regular physical exercise can favorably modulate whole-body IR and improve glucose control and life expectancy of T2D subjects [34]. Therefore, guidelines on T2D management suggest regular physical activity as one causal treatment option [35][36]. This treatment strategy could also exert beneficial effects under conditions of NAFLD/MAFLD [37]. Current guidelines on the clinical management of metabolic fatty liver disease include such recommendations, although evidence is sparse and potential underlying molecular mechanisms are fragmentarily understood [38].

2. The Concept of Metabolic Flexibility: Molecular Mechanisms of Physical Activity on Glucose Metabolism and Insulin Signaling in Skeletal Muscle

The concept of metabolic flexibility is defined by the ability to rapidly adapt to conditional changes in energetic substrate demand, as for instance with transition from feeding to the fasted state, or acute onset of physical activity [39][40][41][42]. It was shown in the 1990s that postabsorpive IR humans expose markedly reduced skeletal muscle fatty acid oxidation, a state termed metabolic inflexibility [43]. Although evidence in this field has enormously grown in past decades it remains established that IR is a key component of metabolic inflexibility (reviewed in [41]). IR is clinically relevant mainly in white adipose tissue (WAT), skeletal muscle, and the liver. A broad body of evidence is available regarding the numerous molecular mechanisms responsible for the development of IR, to which the interested reader is referred [44][45]. Selected aspects in skeletal muscle, which can be modified by physical activity, will be in scope of this paragraph.
Skeletal muscle accounts for 60–80% of insulin stimulation-mediated glucose metabolism [46]. Rising skeletal muscle metabolic activity by means of physical exercise therefore constitutes a promising therapeutic approach. Multiple mechanisms are discussed with regards to acute or chronic exercise training on insulin action and related substrate flux [47][48][49][50][51][52][53]. Figure 1 provides an overview.
Biomedicines 09 01853 g001 550
Figure 1. Potential molecular mechanisms of physical exercise and lipid species on glucose uptake and modulation of insulin action in skeletal muscle (conducted according to [44][50][51][53][54][55][56]). Physical exercise basically modulates supply of substrates and signaling molecules (via enhanced capillary perfusion, capillary recruitment/expansion of capillary volume); membrane transport of glucose (effects are majorly reported for GLUT4); mitochondrial adaptations (mitochondrial plasticity) and metabolic activation (glycolysis, lipid metabolism); and storage capacity and mobilization of energetic substrates (glycogen, IMCL). Effects of physical activity on insulin action and glucose uptake mediated by activation of AMP-activated protein kinase have been evaluated in various clinical settings (reviewed in [31]). AKT2, gene 2 encoding proteinkinase B; AMPK, AMP-activated protein kinase; CaMK, calcium/calmodulin kinase; DAG, diacylglycerol; FATP, fatty acid transport protein; G6P, glucose 6 phosphate; GLUT, glucose transporter; GS, glycogen synthase; GSK, glycogen synthase kinase; GSV, glucose transporter storage vesicle; IRS, insulin receptor substrate; IMCL, intramyocellular lipids; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; NEFA, non-esterified fatty acids; OxPhos, oxidative phosphorylation; PCr, phosphocreatine; PI3K, phospho-inositol 3 kinase; PKC, proteinkinase C; SR, sarcoplasmic reticulum.
Hallmarks of peripheral IR are impaired glucose transporter 4 (GLUT4) mediated glucose uptake by skeletal muscle, and compromised suppressibility of WAT lipolysis (reviewed in [31]). Visceral obesity is common in IR subjects and extensive evidence implicates that elevated circulating non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA) from inappropriate WAT hyperlipolysis are contributing to the etiology [4][57][58]. Under hyperlipolytic conditions increased proportions of NEFA are taken up by skeletal muscle. As indicated in Figure 1 this is followed by a rise in diacylglycerol (DAG), a product exerting potential lipotoxic effects on insulin signal transduction, resulting in reduced insulin stimulated GLUT4 translocation [4][51]. Supporting this, in vivo experimental settings in humans have shown that increased NEFA exposure of skeletal muscle reduces both, non-oxidative and oxidative glucose metabolism, as mirrored by 50% reduced glucose oxidation rates and glycogen storage capacity, respectively [45][59][60]. Furthermore, “NEFA overflow” under IR conditions is related to a rise in intramyocellular lipid (IMCL) deposition, which could play a role in buffering NEFA influx [45]. IMCL, particularly the depots in the subsarcolemmal region, correlate with the presence of IR under in vivo conditions in obese subjects, and are associated with cellular DAG and ceramide levels [61][62][63]. IMCL elevation is hypothesized to result not alone from increased lipid uptake, but also from impaired mitochondrial function. Experimental research supports this hypothesis, showing that skeletal muscle overexpression of the human catalase gene to mitochondria protects from age-related mitochondrial dysfunction and lipid-induced IR [64]. A role for mitochondrial dysfunction is further supported by findings in young lean and normoglycemic subjects with diabetic parents, exposing a 60% increase in IMCL along with a 38% reduced mitochondrial density, and 60% diminished insulin stimulated glucose uptake [65]. Knowledge on IMCL was just recently expanded by showing that contribution of IMCL to whole-body lipid oxidation could decrease in an obesity dependent manner [63]. Interestingly, lean old and young subjects had comparable IMCL, while old obese subjects had more than twofold greater IMCL and were more IR. The authors of this study suggest that skeletal muscle IR and lipid accumulation are likely due to lifestyle factors rather than inherent ageing of skeletal muscle [63]. Remarkably, normal weight endurance trained athletes also have higher IMCL levels with concomitantly increased muscle DAG, but are at the same time more insulin sensitive as compared to sedentary normal weight and obese subjects (“athlete’s paradox”) [61]. In that regard it is known that muscle contractions, comparable to insulin stimulation, can increase DAG levels in skeletal muscle cells and potentially play a role in adaptations induced by exercise [66][67][68]. Therefore, regular physical exercise could not alone normalize DAG related metabolism, but also impact specific proteins involved in subcellular IMCL formation and mobilization. Moreover, physical training appears to improve (or maybe even preserve) mitochondrial function, mediated at least in part by AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) [53][56][61][62]. The latter phenomenon is of specific interest in the discussion according to NAFLD/MAFLD, since it was shown by Michael Rodens’ group in humans in vivo that patients suffering from NASH have substantial mitochondrial dysfunction despite higher mitochondrial mass, resulting in impaired metabolic flexibility [69]. It is well known that IR correlates with mitochondrial function, even in skeletal muscle [70]. Otherwise, beneficial effects of regular exercise on mitochondrial plasticity are recognized [71][72]. For instance, rigorous physical exercise under specific conditions just over few weeks was lately shown to improve muscle mitochondrial volume density by as much as 50% and citrate synthase activity by 40% [73]. Consequently, mitochondrial dysfunction can be defined as central pathology related to IR and ectopic lipid accumulation, while physical activity can be interpreted as a potent treatment option to restore or at least preserve metabolic flexibility. Remarkably, not only endurance training, but also resistance exercise can exert favorable adaptions on ectopic lipid metabolism [74][75]. Figure 2 shows a representative IMCL droplet in skeletal muscle of a trained subject. The close spatial relationship of IMCL and mitochondria could be indicative of a “logistic adaptation”, to be able to quickly respond to increased substrate demand.
Biomedicines 09 01853 g002 550
Figure 2. Electron micrograph of a longitudinal section of skeletal muscle tissue. In the center, at the z-line level, interfibrillar mitochondria with a lipid droplet immediately adjacent are shown (micrograph taken from [76] with kind permission of [77] and Springer-Nature). In support of the concept of metabolic flexibility it is believed that greater IMCL storage capacity in athletes represents an adaptive response to regular physical training, allowing a larger contribution of the local lipid pool as an energetic substrate source during exercise in order to preserve glycogen [76][78]. Li, lipid droplet; mc, central mitochondria; mf myofilament; marker indicates 0.5 µm.
Another elementary energy storage substrate in terms of physical exercise is glycogen. There is an inverse relationship of IR-status, glycogen synthase activity and glycogen storage capacity in human skeletal muscle in vivo [59][79][80]. By contrast, exercise-induced depletion of depots is followed by an enhanced ability to synthesize glycogen [52]. Using a defined depletion-recovery protocol under combined exercise and dietary restriction conditions, followed by carbohydrate overfeeding over days resulted in glycogen storage capacity in humans as high as 15 g per kilogram body weight [81]. Glycogen depletion due to exercise and repletion by dietary intervention during recovery is a routinely used strategy of many athletes [82][83]. Moreover, highly trained endurance athletes can increase fatty acid oxidation in response to lipid overload. At the same time glycogen storage within muscle is preserved at the expense of decreasing glucose oxidation. This maneuver, which is associated with higher mitochondrial capacity of the exercised muscle, represents a unique example of metabolic flexibility [41]. As regards NAFLD/MAFLD, improved glycogen storage and mobilization capacity would be desirable, since this would theoretically help to relieve glucose load from the liver and thereby leave less substrate for de novo lipogenesis (reviewed in [31]). Remarkably, a single bout of exercise can substantially rise insulin sensitivity in IR subjects, while the subsequent increase in insulin stimulated skeletal muscle glucose uptake and glycogen synthesis can be observed for up to 48 h. Interestingly, glycogen levels are increased independently from muscle glycogen content under such conditions (reviewed in [83]). Further research is required to explore which preconditions and exercise schedules will result in best clinical results, specifically in ageing human NAFLD/MAFLD patients. However, it appears that exercising in the fasted state can substantially stimulate glycogen synthesis and IMCL breakdown, at least in young healthy volunteers [84]. Moreover, GLUT4 content of skeletal muscle is related to muscle mass, suggesting potential over-additive effects of a combined endurance and resistance exercise schedule [85].
Finally, one aspect in terms of exercise which can potentially result in unfavorable adaptations needs to be discussed. There is a known relationship between exercise intensity and improved glucose uptake [53]. However, very intense exercise (particularly eccentric exercise, i.e., downhill running), resulting in disruption of muscle cell integrity followed by delayed onset of muscle soreness due to eliciting local inflammatory response can decrease glucose disposal in skeletal muscle for up to 48 h (reviewed in [86]). Although earlier data suggest a compensatory pancreatic β-cell response resulting in raised insulin levels after eccentric exercise in young healthy subjects, it is still unclear whether this remains true for older IR patients [87]. Furthermore, it has been shown very recently that excessive training (i.e., high intensity interval training, HIIT) results in impaired mitochondrial function and glucose intolerance [88]. This clearly indicates that exercise schedules for improving insulin action, glucose uptake and ectopic lipid storage in older IR subjects require professional assessment, appropriate planning, monitoring and management.
Together, regular physical exercise can beneficially impact gross adaptational processes involved in fuel storage and mobilization associated with IR. The concept of metabolic flexibility provides some explanation governing fuel selection between NEFA and glucose, with the related substrate shift serving more efficient energy source utilization during exercise. Beyond this metabolic flexibility enables the switch from catabolic to anabolic processes in which energy substrates can be effectively stored after muscle activity [41]. These adaptations are realized by a multitude of modulations on the transcriptomic, proteomic, and epigenomic level. Obviously, AMPK appears to have a key regulatory function in this situation ([89][90]; reviewed in [41]). From a pathophysiological perspective the model of metabolic flexibility is specifically attractive under conditions of NAFLD/MAFLD, since it can be concluded from existing literature that the regularly exercised skeletal muscle provides substantial surplus storage capacity for energetic substrates (i.e., NEFA and glucose). Moreover, restoration of skeletal muscle fuel depots relies on provision from food sources, further contributing to relieve the liver from an overflow of potential nutritoxic substrates [91][92].

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/biomedicines9121853

References

  1. Eslam, M.; Sanyal, A.J.; George, J. MAFLD: A Consensus-Driven Proposed Nomenclature for Metabolic Associated Fatty Liver Disease. Gastroenterology 2020, 158, 1999–2014.e1.
  2. Stefan, N.; Häring, H.-U.; Cusi, K. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Causes, diagnosis, cardiometabolic consequences, and treatment strategies. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019, 7, 313–324.
  3. Farrell, G.C.; van Rooyen, D.; Gan, L.; Chitturi, S. NASH is an Inflammatory Disorder: Pathogenic, Prognostic and Therapeutic Implications. Gut Liver 2012, 6, 149–171.
  4. Tilg, H.; Moschen, A.R.; Roden, M. NAFLD and diabetes mellitus. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017, 14, 32–42.
  5. Söderberg, C.; Stål, P.; Askling, J.; Glaumann, H.; Lindberg, G.; Marmur, J.; Hultcrantz, R. Decreased survival of subjects with elevated liver function tests during a 28-year follow-up. Hepatology 2010, 51, 595–602.
  6. Angulo, P.; Kleiner, D.E.; Dam-Larsen, S.; Adams, L.A.; Bjornsson, E.S.; Charatcharoenwitthaya, P.; Mills, P.R.; Keach, J.C.; Lafferty, H.D.; Stahler, A.; et al. Liver Fibrosis, but No Other Histologic Features, Is Associated with Long-term Outcomes of Patients with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Gastroenterology 2015, 149, 389–397.e10.
  7. Ekstedt, M.; Hagström, H.; Nasr, P.; Fredrikson, M.; Stål, P.; Kechagias, S.; Hultcrantz, R. Fibrosis stage is the strongest predictor for disease-specific mortality in NAFLD after up to 33 years of follow-up. Hepatology 2015, 61, 1547–1554.
  8. Bertot, L.C.; Adams, L.A. The Natural Course of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 774.
  9. Kim, G.-A.; Lee, H.C.; Choe, J.; Kim, M.-J.; Lee, M.J.; Chang, H.-S.; Bae, I.Y.; Kim, H.-K.; An, J.; Shim, J.H.; et al. Association between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and cancer incidence rate. J. Hepatol. 2018, 68, 140–146.
  10. Hagström, H.; Nasr, P.; Ekstedt, M.; Hammar, U.; Stål, P.; Hultcrantz, R.; Kechagias, S. Fibrosis stage but not NASH predicts mortality and time to development of severe liver disease in biopsy-proven NAFLD. J. Hepatol. 2017, 67, 1265–1273.
  11. Lu, H.; Liu, H.; Hu, F.; Zou, L.; Luo, S.; Sun, L. Independent Association between Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int. J. Endocrinol. 2013, 2013, 124958.
  12. Than, N.N.; Newsome, P.N. A concise review of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Atherosclerosis 2015, 239, 192–202.
  13. Lee, Y.-H.; Kim, K.J.; Yoo, M.E.; Kim, G.; Yoon, H.-J.; Jo, K.; Youn, J.-C.; Yun, M.; Park, J.Y.; Shim, C.Y.; et al. Association of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis with subclinical myocardial dysfunction in non-cirrhotic patients. J. Hepatol. 2018, 68, 764–772.
  14. Targher, G.; Byrne, C.D. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: An emerging driving force in chronic kidney disease. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2017, 13, 297–310.
  15. Yeung, M.-W.; Wong, G.L.-H.; Choi, K.C.; Luk, A.O.-Y.; Kwok, R.; Shu, S.S.-T.; Chan, A.W.-H.; Lau, E.S.H.; Ma, R.C.W.; Chan, H.L.-Y.; et al. Advanced liver fibrosis but not steatosis is independently associated with albuminuria in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes. J. Hepatol. 2018, 68, 147–156.
  16. Buckley, A.J.; Thomas, E.L.; Lessan, N.; Trovato, F.M.; Trovato, G.M.; Taylor-Robinson, S.D. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Relationship with cardiovascular risk markers and clinical endpoints. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2018, 144, 144–152.
  17. Ma, C.; Zhang, Q.; Greten, T.F. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease promotes hepatocellular carcinoma through direct and indirect effects on hepatocytes. FEBS J. 2018, 285, 752–762.
  18. Huber, Y.; Labenz, C.; Michel, M.; Wörns, M.-A.; Galle, P.R.; Kostev, K.; Schattenberg, J.M. Tumor Incidence in Patients with Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Dtsch. Ärzteblatt Int. 2020, 117, 719–724.
  19. Fukunaga, S.; Nakano, D.; Kawaguchi, T.; Eslam, M.; Ouchi, A.; Nagata, T.; Kuroki, H.; Kawata, H.; Abe, H.; Nouno, R.; et al. Non-Obese MAFLD Is Associated with Colorectal Adenoma in Health Check Examinees: A Multicenter Retrospective Study. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5462.
  20. Koskinas, J.; Gomatos, I.P.; Tiniakos, D.G.; Memos, N.; Boutsikou, M.; Garatzioti, A.; Archimandritis, A.; Betrosian, A. Liver histology in ICU patients dying from sepsis: A clinico-pathological study. World J. Gastroenterol. 2008, 14, 1389–1393.
  21. Shaker, M.; Tabbaa, A.; Albeldawi, M.; Alkhouri, N. Liver transplantation for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: New challenges and new opportunities. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 5320–5330.
  22. Wong, R.J.; Cheung, R.; Ahmed, A. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis is the most rapidly growing indication for liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in the U.S. Hepatology 2014, 59, 2188–2195.
  23. Wang, X.; Li, J.; Riaz, D.R.; Shi, G.; Liu, C.; Dai, Y. Outcomes of liver transplantation for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2014, 12, 394–402.
  24. Hoppe, S.; von Loeffelholz, C.; Lock, J.F.; Doecke, S.; Sinn, B.V.; Rieger, A.; Malinowski, M.; Pfeiffer, A.F.H.; Neuhaus, P.; Stockmann, M. Nonalcoholic steatohepatits and liver steatosis modify partial hepatectomy recovery. J. Investig. Surg. 2015, 28, 24–31.
  25. Stepanova, M.; Henry, L.; Garg, R.; Kalwaney, S.; Saab, S.; Younossi, Z. Risk of de novo post-transplant type 2 diabetes in patients undergoing liver transplant for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. BMC Gastroenterol. 2015, 15, 175.
  26. Golabi, P.; Otgonsuren, M.; de Avila, L.; Sayiner, M.; Rafiq, N.; Younossi, Z.M. Components of metabolic syndrome increase the risk of mortality in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Medicine 2018, 97, e0214.
  27. Sommerfeld, O.; von Loeffelholz, C.; Diab, M.; Kiessling, S.; Doenst, T.; Bauer, M.; Sponholz, C. Association between high dose catecholamine support and liver dysfunction following cardiac surgery. J. Card. Surg. 2020, 35, 1228–1236.
  28. Byrne, C.D.; Targher, G. NAFLD: A multisystem disease. J. Hepatol. 2015, 62, S47–S64.
  29. Paik, J.M.; Golabi, P.; Biswas, R.; Alqahtani, S.; Venkatesan, C.; Younossi, Z.M. Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Alcoholic Liver Disease are Major Drivers of Liver Mortality in the United States. Hepatol. Commun. 2020, 4, 890–903.
  30. Skyler, J.S.; Bakris, G.L.; Bonifacio, E.; Darsow, T.; Eckel, R.H.; Groop, L.; Groop, P.-H.; Handelsman, Y.; Insel, R.A.; Mathieu, C.; et al. Differentiation of Diabetes by Pathophysiology, Natural History, and Prognosis. Diabetes 2017, 66, 241–255.
  31. von Loeffelholz, C.; Coldewey, S.M.; Birkenfeld, A.L. A Narrative Review on the Role of AMPK on De Novo Lipogenesis in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Evidence from Human Studies. Cells 2021, 10, 1822.
  32. Lewis, G.F.; Carpentier, A.; Adeli, K.; Giacca, A. Disordered fat storage and mobilization in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. Endocr. Rev. 2002, 23, 201–229.
  33. Bril, F.; Barb, D.; Portillo-Sanchez, P.; Biernacki, D.; Lomonaco, R.; Suman, A.; Weber, M.H.; Budd, J.T.; Lupi, M.E.; Cusi, K. Metabolic and histological implications of intrahepatic triglyceride content in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 2017, 65, 1132–1144.
  34. Jonker, J.T.; de Laet, C.; Franco, O.H.; Peeters, A.; Mackenbach, J.; Nusselder, W.J. Physical activity and life expectancy with and without diabetes: Life table analysis of the Framingham Heart Study. Diabetes Care 2006, 29, 38–43.
  35. Sigal, R.J.; Kenny, G.P.; Wasserman, D.H.; Castaneda-Sceppa, C.; White, R.D. Physical activity/exercise and type 2 diabetes: A consensus statement from the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 2006, 29, 1433–1438.
  36. Kirwan, J.P.; Sacks, J.; Nieuwoudt, S. The essential role of exercise in the management of type 2 diabetes. Clevel. Clin. J. Med. 2017, 84, S15–S21.
  37. Golabi, P.; Gerber, L.; Paik, J.M.; Deshpande, R.; de Avila, L.; Younossi, Z.M. Contribution of sarcopenia and physical inactivity to mortality in people with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. JHEP Rep. 2020, 2, 100171.
  38. Tokushige, K.; Ikejima, K.; Ono, M.; Eguchi, Y.; Kamada, Y.; Itoh, Y.; Akuta, N.; Yoneda, M.; Iwasa, M.; Yoneda, M.; et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease/nonalcoholic steatohepatitis 2020. J. Gastroenterol. 2021, 56, 951–963.
  39. Kelley, D.E. Skeletal muscle fat oxidation: Timing and flexibility are everything. J. Clin. Investig. 2005, 115, 1699–1702.
  40. Corpeleijn, E.; Saris, W.H.M.; Blaak, E.E. Metabolic flexibility in the development of insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes: Effects of lifestyle. Obes. Rev. 2009, 10, 178–193.
  41. Goodpaster, B.H.; Sparks, L.M. Metabolic Flexibility in Health and Disease. Cell Metab. 2017, 25, 1027–1036.
  42. Smith, R.L.; Soeters, M.R.; Wüst, R.C.I.; Houtkooper, R.H. Metabolic Flexibility as an Adaptation to Energy Resources and Requirements in Health and Disease. Endocr. Rev. 2018, 39, 489–517.
  43. Colberg, S.R.; Simoneau, J.A.; Thaete, F.L.; Kelley, D.E. Skeletal muscle utilization of free fatty acids in women with visceral obesity. J. Clin. Investig. 1995, 95, 1846–1853.
  44. Samuel, V.T.; Shulman, G.I. Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease as a Nexus of Metabolic and Hepatic Diseases. Cell Metab. 2018, 27, 22–41.
  45. Petersen, K.F.; Shulman, G.I. Pathogenesis of skeletal muscle insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am. J. Cardiol. 2002, 90, 11G–18G.
  46. Ng, J.M.; Azuma, K.; Kelley, C.; Pencek, R.; Radikova, Z.; Laymon, C.; Price, J.; Goodpaster, B.H.; Kelley, D.E. PET imaging reveals distinctive roles for different regional adipose tissue depots in systemic glucose metabolism in nonobese humans. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2012, 303, E1134–E1141.
  47. Haddad, F.; Adams, G.R. Selected contribution: Acute cellular and molecular responses to resistance exercise. J. Appl. Physiol. 2002, 93, 394–403.
  48. Henriksen, E.J. Invited review: Effects of acute exercise and exercise training on insulin resistance. J. Appl. Physiol. 2002, 93, 788–796.
  49. Zierath, J.R. Invited review: Exercise training-induced changes in insulin signaling in skeletal muscle. J. Appl. Physiol. 2002, 93, 773–781.
  50. Sakamoto, K.; Goodyear, L.J. Invited review: Intracellular signaling in contracting skeletal muscle. J. Appl. Physiol. 2002, 93, 369–383.
  51. Roden, M. How free fatty acids inhibit glucose utilization in human skeletal muscle. News Physiol. Sci. 2004, 19, 92–96.
  52. Holloszy, J.O. Exercise-induced increase in muscle insulin sensitivity. J. Appl. Physiol. 2005, 99, 338–343.
  53. Richter, E.A.; Hargreaves, M. Exercise, GLUT4, and skeletal muscle glucose uptake. Physiol. Rev. 2013, 93, 993–1017.
  54. Hegarty, B.D.; Turner, N.; Cooney, G.J.; Kraegen, E.W. Insulin resistance and fuel homeostasis: The role of AMP-activated protein kinase. Acta Physiol. 2009, 196, 129–145.
  55. Petersen, M.C.; Shulman, G.I. Mechanisms of Insulin Action and Insulin Resistance. Physiol. Rev. 2018, 98, 2133–2223.
  56. Herzig, S.; Shaw, R.J. AMPK: Guardian of metabolism and mitochondrial homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2018, 19, 121–135.
  57. Nielsen, S.; Guo, Z.; Johnson, C.M.; Hensrud, D.D.; Jensen, M.D. Splanchnic lipolysis in human obesity. J. Clin. Investig. 2004, 113, 1582–1588.
  58. Roden, M. Mechanisms of Disease: Hepatic steatosis in type 2 diabetes—Pathogenesis and clinical relevance. Nat. Clin. Pract. Endocrinol. Metab. 2006, 2, 335–348.
  59. Roden, M.; Price, T.B.; Perseghin, G.; Petersen, K.F.; Rothman, D.L.; Cline, G.W.; Shulman, G.I. Mechanism of free fatty acid-induced insulin resistance in humans. J. Clin. Investig. 1996, 97, 2859–2865.
  60. Abbasi, F.; McLaughlin, T.; Lamendola, C.; Reaven, G.M. The relationship between glucose disposal in response to physiological hyperinsulinemia and basal glucose and free fatty acid concentrations in healthy volunteers. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2000, 85, 1251–1254.
  61. Amati, F.; Dubé, J.J.; Alvarez-Carnero, E.; Edreira, M.M.; Chomentowski, P.; Coen, P.M.; Switzer, G.E.; Bickel, P.E.; Stefanovic-Racic, M.; Toledo, F.G.S.; et al. Skeletal muscle triglycerides, diacylglycerols, and ceramides in insulin resistance: Another paradox in endurance-trained athletes? Diabetes 2011, 60, 2588–2597.
  62. Coen, P.M.; Menshikova, E.V.; Distefano, G.; Zheng, D.; Tanner, C.J.; Standley, R.A.; Helbling, N.L.; Dubis, G.S.; Ritov, V.B.; Xie, H.; et al. Exercise and Weight Loss Improve Muscle Mitochondrial Respiration, Lipid Partitioning, and Insulin Sensitivity After Gastric Bypass Surgery. Diabetes 2015, 64, 3737–3750.
  63. Chee, C.; Shannon, C.E.; Burns, A.; Selby, A.L.; Wilkinson, D.; Smith, K.; Greenhaff, P.L.; Stephens, F.B. Relative Contribution of Intramyocellular Lipid to Whole-Body Fat Oxidation Is Reduced with Age but Subsarcolemmal Lipid Accumulation and Insulin Resistance Are Only Associated with Overweight Individuals. Diabetes 2016, 65, 840–850.
  64. Lee, H.-Y.; Choi, C.S.; Birkenfeld, A.L.; Alves, T.C.; Jornayvaz, F.R.; Jurczak, M.J.; Zhang, D.; Woo, D.K.; Shadel, G.S.; Ladiges, W.; et al. Targeted expression of catalase to mitochondria prevents age-associated reductions in mitochondrial function and insulin resistance. Cell Metab. 2010, 12, 668–674.
  65. Morino, K.; Petersen, K.F.; Dufour, S.; Befroy, D.; Frattini, J.; Shatzkes, N.; Neschen, S.; White, M.F.; Bilz, S.; Sono, S.; et al. Reduced mitochondrial density and increased IRS-1 serine phosphorylation in muscle of insulin-resistant offspring of type 2 diabetic parents. J. Clin. Investig. 2005, 115, 3587–3593.
  66. Cleland, P.J.; Appleby, G.J.; Rattigan, S.; Clark, M.G. Exercise-induced translocation of protein kinase C and production of diacylglycerol and phosphatidic acid in rat skeletal muscle in vivo. Relationship to changes in glucose transport. J. Biol. Chem. 1989, 264, 17704–17711.
  67. Ishizuka, T.; Cooper, D.R.; Hernandez, H.; Buckley, D.; Standaert, M.; Farese, R.V. Effects of insulin on diacylglycerol-protein kinase C signaling in rat diaphragm and soleus muscles and relationship to glucose transport. Diabetes 1990, 39, 181–190.
  68. You, J.-S.; Lincoln, H.C.; Kim, C.-R.; Frey, J.W.; Goodman, C.A.; Zhong, X.-P.; Hornberger, T.A. The role of diacylglycerol kinase ζ and phosphatidic acid in the mechanical activation of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling and skeletal muscle hypertrophy. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 1551–1563.
  69. Koliaki, C.; Szendroedi, J.; Kaul, K.; Jelenik, T.; Nowotny, P.; Jankowiak, F.; Herder, C.; Carstensen, M.; Krausch, M.; Knoefel, W.T.; et al. Adaptation of hepatic mitochondrial function in humans with non-alcoholic fatty liver is lost in steatohepatitis. Cell Metab. 2015, 21, 739–746.
  70. Szendroedi, J.; Roden, M. Mitochondrial fitness and insulin sensitivity in humans. Diabetologia 2008, 51, 2155–2167.
  71. Boushel, R.; Lundby, C.; Qvortrup, K.; Sahlin, K. Mitochondrial plasticity with exercise training and extreme environments. Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. 2014, 42, 169–174.
  72. Steenberg, D.E.; Jørgensen, N.B.; Birk, J.B.; Sjøberg, K.A.; Kiens, B.; Richter, E.A.; Wojtaszewski, J.F.P. Exercise training reduces the insulin-sensitizing effect of a single bout of exercise in human skeletal muscle. J. Physiol. 2019, 597, 89–103.
  73. Lundby, A.-K.M.; Jacobs, R.A.; Gehrig, S.; de Leur, J.; Hauser, M.; Bonne, T.C.; Flück, D.; Dandanell, S.; Kirk, N.; Kaech, A.; et al. Exercise training increases skeletal muscle mitochondrial volume density by enlargement of existing mitochondria and not de novo biogenesis. Acta Physiol. 2018, 222, e12905.
  74. Essén-Gustavsson, B.; Tesch, P.A. Glycogen and triglyceride utilization in relation to muscle metabolic characteristics in men performing heavy-resistance exercise. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol. 1990, 61, 5–10.
  75. Koopman, R.; Manders, R.J.F.; Jonkers, R.A.M.; Hul, G.B.J.; Kuipers, H.; van Loon, L.J.C. Intramyocellular lipid and glycogen content are reduced following resistance exercise in untrained healthy males. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2006, 96, 525–534.
  76. van Loon, L.J.C.; Goodpaster, B.H. Increased intramuscular lipid storage in the insulin-resistant and endurance-trained state. Pflug. Arch. 2006, 451, 606–616.
  77. Hoppeler, H.; Howald, H.; Conley, K.; Lindstedt, S.L.; Claassen, H.; Vock, P.; Weibel, E.R. Endurance training in humans: Aerobic capacity and structure of skeletal muscle. J. Appl. Physiol. 1985, 59, 320–327.
  78. Dubé, J.J.; Amati, F.; Stefanovic-Racic, M.; Toledo, F.G.S.; Sauers, S.E.; Goodpaster, B.H. Exercise-induced alterations in intramyocellular lipids and insulin resistance: The athlete’s paradox revisited. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2008, 294, E882–E888.
  79. Bogardus, C.; Lillioja, S.; Stone, K.; Mott, D. Correlation between muscle glycogen synthase activity and in vivo insulin action in man. J. Clin. Investig. 1984, 73, 1185–1190.
  80. Ivy, J.L. Muscle glycogen synthesis before and after exercise. Sports Med. 1991, 11, 6–19.
  81. Acheson, K.J.; Schutz, Y.; Bessard, T.; Anantharaman, K.; Flatt, J.P.; Jéquier, E. Glycogen storage capacity and de novo lipogenesis during massive carbohydrate overfeeding in man. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1988, 48, 240–247.
  82. Ivy, J.L. Regulation of muscle glycogen repletion, muscle protein synthesis and repair following exercise. J. Sports Sci. Med. 2004, 3, 131–138.
  83. Stephens, F.B.; Tsintzas, K. Metabolic and molecular changes associated with the increased skeletal muscle insulin action 24–48 h after exercise in young and old humans. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2018, 46, 111–118.
  84. de Bock, K.; Richter, E.A.; Russell, A.P.; Eijnde, B.O.; Derave, W.; Ramaekers, M.; Koninckx, E.; Léger, B.; Verhaeghe, J.; Hespel, P. Exercise in the fasted state facilitates fibre type-specific intramyocellular lipid breakdown and stimulates glycogen resynthesis in humans. J. Physiol. 2005, 564, 649–660.
  85. Gaster, M.; Vach, W.; Beck-Nielsen, H.; Schrøder, H.D. GLUT4 expression at the plasma membrane is related to fibre volume in human skeletal muscle fibres. APMIS 2002, 110, 611–619.
  86. Kirwan, J.P.; Del Aguila, L.F. Insulin signalling, exercise and cellular integrity. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2003, 31, 1281–1285.
  87. King, D.S.; Feltmeyer, T.L.; Baldus, P.J.; Sharp, R.L.; Nespor, J. Effects of eccentric exercise on insulin secretion and action in humans. J. Appl. Physiol. 1993, 75, 2151–2156.
  88. Flockhart, M.; Nilsson, L.C.; Tais, S.; Ekblom, B.; Apró, W.; Larsen, F.J. Excessive exercise training causes mitochondrial functional impairment and decreases glucose tolerance in healthy volunteers. Cell Metab. 2021, 33, 957–970.e6.
  89. Egan, B.; Zierath, J.R. Exercise metabolism and the molecular regulation of skeletal muscle adaptation. Cell Metab. 2013, 17, 162–184.
  90. Hoffman, N.J.; Parker, B.L.; Chaudhuri, R.; Fisher-Wellman, K.H.; Kleinert, M.; Humphrey, S.J.; Yang, P.; Holliday, M.; Trefely, S.; Fazakerley, D.J.; et al. Global Phosphoproteomic Analysis of Human Skeletal Muscle Reveals a Network of Exercise-Regulated Kinases and AMPK Substrates. Cell Metab. 2015, 22, 922–935.
  91. Larson-Meyer, D.E.; Newcomer, B.R.; Hunter, G.R. Influence of endurance running and recovery diet on intramyocellular lipid content in women: A 1H NMR study. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2002, 282, E95–E106.
  92. Zderic, T.W.; Davidson, C.J.; Schenk, S.; Byerley, L.O.; Coyle, E.F. High-fat diet elevates resting intramuscular triglyceride concentration and whole-body lipolysis during exercise. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2004, 286, E217–E225.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!
Academic Video Service
Feedback