Cutaneous Melanocytic Tumor with CRTC1::TRIM11 Fusion: History
View Latest Version
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Subjects: Dermatology
Contributor:
Konstantinos Linos
,
Ourania Parra

Molecular profiling of unclassified neoplasms has been pivotal in the characterization of new entities. Cutaneous melanocytic tumor with CRTC1::TRIM11 fusion (CMTCT) is a newly described neoplasm that falls into the broad category of diagnostically challenging dermal proliferations with melanocytic differentiation.

  • CRTC1
  • TRIM1
  • melanocytoma
  • melanocytic differentiation

1. Introduction

The histopathologic diagnosis of dermal/subcutaneous proliferations with melanocytic differentiation can be challenging due to existing similarities among different entities and their broad differential diagnosis. This includes the newly described superficial melanocytic tumor with CRTC1::TRIM11 fusion. Cellier et al. [1] first reported five cases in 2018 and described it as a relatively well-circumscribed neoplasm composed of atypical spindle and epithelioid cells immunoreactive for melanocytic markers, such as SOX10, MITF, and S100-protein; it was initially termed “cutaneous melanocytoma with CRTC1::TRIM11 fusion”. Since then, eight more cases sharing the same morphologic, immunohistochemical and molecular phenotype have been added to the literature [2][3][4][5]. The histopathologic differential diagnosis includes cutaneous clear cell sarcoma, primary dermal and metastatic melanoma, atypical blue nevus, Spitz tumor, myoepithelial tumor, epithelioid schwannoma, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST), and paraganglioma-like dermal melanocytic tumor. CMTCT’s biologic behavior has not yet been determined, as the reported median follow-up is relatively short (12 months); one case did recur and metastasized to the regional lymph nodes and lung after 13 years, which prompted the use of the term “cutaneous melanocytic tumor with CRTC1::TRIM11 fusion” (CMTCT).

2. Histopathologic and Immunohistochemical Features

CMTCT most commonly presents as a well-circumscribed dermal (or dermal and subcutaneous) nodular or multilobulated tumor, with pushing borders, occasionally surrounded by a fibrous capsule. Three cases have exhibited a focally infiltrating pattern of growth [1][3]. A polypoid appearance has also been reported [4]. The neoplasm may abut and/or attenuate the overlying epidermis; however, an intraepidermal component has not been described so far. The neoplasm is composed of nests, fascicles, bundles, or sheets of mostly non-pigmented spindle and epithelioid cells, surrounded by thin collagenous septa. Multinucleated giant cells may also be identified. Cytologically, it exhibits pale to eosinophilic cytoplasm, mild to severe pleomorphism with mild to moderate nuclear atypia, and prominent nucleoli and nuclear pseudoinclusions. All reported cases [1][2][3][4][5] displayed mitotic activity, ranging from 1 to 12 mitoses/10HPF. Areas of necrosis have also been identified in three cases so far [4]. The tumor may be accompanied by a peripheral lymphocytic infiltrate. The histopathologic features of a CMTCT case are presented in Figure 1.
Biology 10 01286 g001 550
Figure 1. Histopathologic characteristics of a CMTCT case. (A). Punch biopsy specimen showing a well-circumscribed encapsulated nodule in the deep dermis and subcutis. (H&E, 10×) (B,C). The tumor is predominantly arranged in nests and bundles that are surrounded by thin collagenous fibers. It is composed of relatively uniform epithelioid and spindle cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm and round to oval nuclei with prominent nucleoli. (H&E, 100×, 200×) (D). A mitotic figure (black arrow) and a multinucleated cell (black arrowhead) are noted. (H&E, 400×).
Immunohistochemical features of CMTCT include consistent diffuse SOX10 and MITF immunoreaction [1][2][3][4][5]. MelanA and HMB-45 expression may be focal or patchy and, in some instances, completely absent. Most of the cases reported were also diffusely S100-protein positive; however, in a few cases, S100-protein expression was patchy, focal, or absent. INI1 nuclear expression was retained in all cases tested so far [3], and p16 has been reported as focally positive in a sole case [4]. In total, six cases have also been tested positive for NTRK1 immunohistochemistry (IHC), but the FISH studies failed to identify NTRK1 fusions or amplifications [1][5]. Lastly, TRIM11 IHC was positive in all five cases examined [1]. Various immunohistochemical stains that have been reported negative are SMA, desmin, caldesmon, CD163, pankeratin, calponin, CD68, CD34, p63, WT1, synaptophysin, chromogranin, CD99, NFP, Neu-N, GFAP, ALK, and ROS. The immunohistochemical profile of a CMTCT case are displayed in Figure 2A–D.
Biology 10 01286 g002 550
Figure 2. Immunohistochemical features of CMTCT. (A). SOX10 shows diffuse nuclear immunoreaction (140×). (B). S100-protein shows nuclear and cytoplasmic positivity (140×). (C). MITF is also diffusely positive (140×). (D). The double staining of MelanA and Ki-67 shows a low proliferation index (20×) and focal weak MelanA immunoreaction (inset, 100×). (E). Fluorescence in situ hybridization revealed the juxtaposition of the red (CRTC1) and green (TRIM11) signals. (Study kindly performed by Julia A. Bridge M.D, University of Nebraska Medical Center).

3. Molecular Diagnostics

The CRTC1::TRIM11 fusion has been detected in various studies by RNA sequencing and RT-PCR/direct sequencing, as well as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) (Figure 2E) [1][2][3][4][5]. Chromogenic in situ hybridization and FISH has also been utilized to detect TRIM11 rearrangements [3]. EWSR1 break-apart FISH was performed in a subset of cases to exclude clear cell sarcoma. In two cases array-comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) detected gain of the whole chromosome 7, and one case was negative for cytogenetic abnormalities [1][5]. The detected CRTC1::TRIM11 fusion transcript in the cases examined involved exon 1 of CRTC1 and exons 2–6 of TRIM11 [t(19;1)(p13.11;q42.13)]. The exact mechanism of action of the fusion product remains to be elucidated.

4. Molecular Pathogenesis

CREB-regulated transcription coactivator 1 (CRTC1) is a gene located on the short arm of chromosome 19, and encodes for a protein that activates the cAMP response element-binding (CREB) protein, which is involved in the gene expression that regulates cell proliferation and differentiation [6]. Physiologically, CRTC1 expression is limited to a few tissues, such as the brain, where it is crucial in hippocampal-dependent memory, neuronal plasticity, dendritic growth, the suprachiasmatic circadian clock, and central nervous system satiety network. It is also involved in metabolism control [7]. In addition to its normal functions, CRTC1 and its isoforms also promote tumorigenesis. Schumacher et al. [7] showed that CRTC1 activation plays an important role in colonic adenocarcinoma growth, through the enhancement of prostaglandin E2 function, which includes NR4A2, COX2, AREG, and IL-6 expression. It is also implicated in the pathogenesis of multiple neoplasms as a fusion partner. The CRTC1::MAML2 fusion has been detected in mucoepidermoid carcinomas of the salivary gland [8], breast [9], and liver [10], as well as clear cell hidradenomas [11]. The CRTC1::MAML2 fusion product upregulates CREB induced transcription, leading to oncogenesis; however, Chen et al. [12] described a non CREB-mediated transcription stimulation, which includes interaction with other transcription regulators, including MYC, TP53, NF-κB, ATF2, GLI1, STAT6, and AP-1. A CRTC1::SS18 fusion has also been reported in a subset of undifferentiated small round blue cell sarcomas [13].
A total of six cases of CMTCT displayed TrkA expression by immunohistochemistry, without corresponding NTRK1 gene fusion or amplification. The exact mechanism of the protein overexpression has not been studied in CMTCT; it may reflect true over-transcription of the gene through other mechanisms that may be related to the CRTC1::TRIM11 chimeric protein activity [5]. Increased NTRK1 mRNA and corresponding TrkA protein overexpression have also been described in two cases of undifferentiated small round blue cell sarcoma with CRTC1::SS18 fusion. This finding further supports the possible correlation between CRTC1 rearrangements and aberrant NTRK1 expression [13]. The overexpression of a Trk protein without corresponding gene amplification or fusion has also been described in other tumors. Kao et al. [14] reported upregulation of NTRK3 mRNA with corresponding TrkC protein overexpression detected by Pan-TRK immunohistochemical antibody in the majority of BCOR and YWHAE rearranged sarcomas studied.
Tripartite motif-containing protein 11 (TRIM11) is a gene located on the 1q42.13 region, and encodes for a protein with E3 ubiquitin ligase activity that participates in protein degradation in various tissue types [15]. Increased TRIM11 mRNA expression-compared to normal tissue- has been described in hepatocellular carcinoma, which translated to increased protein expression by IHC [16], lung non-small cell carcinoma (NSCC) [15], prostatic, colonic, gastric adenocarcinomas [17][18][19], and lymphoma [20]. TRIM11 upregulation is also associated with increased motility, invasiveness, and cell proliferation of lung and breast cancer cells and glioblastoma cell lines [15][21][22]. Conversely, when TRIM11 was knocked down in ovarian cancer cells and lymphoma tissues/lymphoma cell lines in vitro, suppression of cell proliferation was observed. This was the result of either an increase in apoptotic factors or the prevention of cell cycle progression to S or G2 phase [20][23]. In lymphoma tissue and cell lines in particular, the knockdown of TRIM11 resulted in decreased expression of β-catenin, Cyclin D1, and c-Myc, while Axin1 was increased due to decreased ubiquitin-induced degradation. [20] Furthermore, Huang et al. [24] observed increased CD31 expression and microvascular density in lung adenocarcinoma cell lines with upregulated TRIM11 compared to TRIM11 downregulated cell lines, indicating stimulation of angiogenesis. High TRIM11 expression was also recognized as an independent marker of poor prognosis in patients with breast cancer, colon and prostate adenocarcinoma, lung NSCC, HCC, and glioblastoma and it has also been correlated with advanced disease stage. [15][16][17][18][20][21][22] Although TRIM11 expression by IHC has been examined in a variety of neoplasms, data on entities that lie within the differential of CRTC1::TRIM11 melanocytic tumor are limited. Hence, more studies to assess its sensitivity and specificity in identifying CMTCT are necessary.
The reported cases’ clinical, histopathologic, immunohistochemical and molecular features are presented in Table 1.
Table 1. Clinical, histopathologic, immunohistochemical and molecular characteristics of all published CMTCT cases.
Author Case Age Sex Location SOX-10 MITF S100 MelanA HMB-45 TRIM11 NTRK1 CRTC1::
TRIM11 Fusion (RNA Sequencing)		 TRIM11 FISH NTRK1 FISH CGH Recurrence Follow-Up (Months)
Cellier et al. [1] 1 28 F Leg + + + + a + d + + + + − +7 No 36
  2 82 M Lumbar + + + + a + a + + + + − − No 6
  3 25 F Elbow + a + + + − NP + + + − NP No 14
  4 28 F Thigh + + + + + d + + + + NP +7 No 72
  5 64 M Neck + + + − + d + + + + NP NP No 3
Bontoux et al. [2] 6 31 F Arm + NP + + + a NP NP + NP NP NP Yes e 156
Kashima et al. [3] 7 77 M Thigh + + + + b + a + NP + CISH + NP NP No 12
Ko et al. [4] 8 32 M Ear lobe + NP + a − − NP NP NP + NP NP No 16
  9 59 F Face + NP − − − NP NP NP + NP NP No 12
  10 11 F Lower leg + NP − + a + a NP NP + + NP NP No 10
  11 49 M Leg + NP + b − − NP NP + + NP NP No 10
Parra et al. [5] 12 65 F Back + + + + c + c NP + + − − − No 48
  13 33 F Bicep + NP + + b NP NP NP + + NP NP No 9

7. Differential Diagnosis

Cutaneous clear cell sarcoma (CCS): The main differential diagnosis of CMTCT is primary or metastatic cutaneous clear cell sarcoma (CCS). Similar to CMTCT, primary superficial CCS typically presents as a single dermal/subcutaneous nodule or multilobulated tumor organized in nests or fascicles of spindle and epithelioid cells with pale to eosinophilic cytoplasm, surrounded by delicate collagen fibers [25]. It involves the dermis and possibly the subcutis in an infiltrative manner, and can also rarely display epidermotropism, with isolated tumoral nests at the dermo-epidermal junction [26]. In the majority of cases, wreath-like giant cells, which are different from the multinucleated giant cells of CMTCT in terms of the distribution of the nuclei, are present. Immunohistochemically, CCS displays positivity for S100-protein, HMB-45, MelanA and SOX10. The pathogenic driver event of CCS is rearrangement of the EWSR1 gene with ATF1 (90% of the cases), CREB1 or CREM as fusion partners [27][28]. Compared to CCS, CMTCT displays mostly a pushing border rather than an infiltrating one and does not involve the epidermis. Furthermore, CMTCT appears to behave in a less aggressive fashion than CCS; hence distinction between these two entities, possibly with the input of molecular techniques, is imperative. Based on their case of recurrent and metastasizing CMTCT, Bontoux et al. [2] argued that this entity represents a cutaneous CCS with a fusion other than the most common EWSR1::ATF1. Currently, there is no evidence that the two neoplasms share similar pathways of pathogenesis, and a definitive classification of CMTCT would be premature. More studies with emphasis on the activity of the CRTC1::TRIM11 fusion product are needed to further classify CMTCT.
Other melanocytic neoplasms: Primary or metastatic melanoma confined to the dermis/subcutis lies within the differential and has been the initial diagnosis in 5 cases of CMTCT. [1] Primary dermal melanoma (PDM) also presents as a single nodule or multilobulated tumor composed of spindle, or epithelioid cells arranged in sheets or nests [29][30]. Since a subset of PDMs behave in a low grade fashion compared to similar thickness conventional melanomas, it is plausible that some of them may represent CMTCT. [1] The detection of CRTC1::TRIM11 fusion and/or the lack of characteristic mutations and cytogenetic abnormalities of PDM could aid in the distinction between the two entities [4][31][32][33]. To exclude a metastatic or regressing melanoma, an extensive histopathologic and clinical work-up are necessary. TRIM11 immunohistochemistry may also have some value as a screening tool for CMTCT; however, TRIM11 has not been examined in melanoma and other dermal proliferations with melanocytic differentiation. More studies are necessary to determine the marker’s diagnostic utility. [1] Albeit rare, NTRK-fused metastatic Spitz melanomas with corresponding anti-Trk immunoreaction have been reported in the literature [34]. Therefore, Trk immunohistochemistry may not be useful in the differential diagnosis.
Spitz tumors also display spindled and/or epithelioid cytological features; however, the majority of them have a different pathway of pathogenesis with fusions in oncogenic kinase drivers, such as ROS1, ALK, NTRK1, NTRK3, MAP3K8, MET, BRAF, and RET [35][36]. As mentioned above CMTCT expresses TrkA by IHC, however, NTRK1 rearrangements have not been described. Spitz tumors with NTRK fusions display distinct histologic features that may aid in the differential diagnosis. They are usually compound, with epidermal hyperplasia and thin rete ridges [37]. Approximately half of them display a wedge-shaped architecture, and the majority of them is composed of small spindle and/or epithelioid cells that can form rosette-like structures [35][38].
Clear cell tumor with melanocytic differentiation and MITF rearrangements: Recently, de la Fouchardiere et al. [39] reported seven cases of an intradermal tumor with clear cell features and expression of melanocytic markers, harboring the ACTIN (ACTG1 or ACTB)::MITF fusion. Similar to CMTCT, as well as to CSS, the neoplasm presented as a dermal nodule, occasionally involving the subcutis, in patients of all ages. The lesional cells mostly displayed a clear-appearing cytoplasm, and were arranged in small nests or cords; however, they were typically more confluent. The degree of atypia and mitotic activity was also similar to those of CMTCT. MelanA, HMB-45, MITF, S100-protein, and SOX10 immunoreaction confirmed the melanocytic differentiation of this tumor. Although MITF hyperactivity could explain the morphologic and immunohistochemical phenotype of this neoplasm, the exact mechanism of action of the ACTIN::MITF chimera is still unknown. De la Fouchardiere et al. [40] also reported a case of clear cell tumor with melanocytic differentiation (diffuse SOX10, MITF and S100-protein positivity), harboring MITF::CREM fusion, and resembling clear cell sarcoma. Compared to CMTCT, the neoplasm displayed a higher degree of atypia, an infiltrating pattern of growth, and perineural invasion.
Other soft tissue neoplasms: Myoepithelial tumors display epithelioid or spindle cytology with S100-protein and SOX10 immunoreactivity. However, in contrast to CMTCT they also display immunoreaction for (myo)epithelial markers such as EMA, low-molecular weight cytokeratins, calponin, and p63 and a subset of them harbors EWSR1 rearrangements [41]. Epithelioid schwannoma and epithelioid malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) lie in the differential as well, but they are consistently negative for melanocytic markers including MITF, and a subset of them shows loss of INI1 expression. [42][43]
Paraganglioma-like dermal melanocytic tumor (PDMT): Paraganglioma-like dermal melanocytic tumor is an entity that was first reported by Deyrup et al. in 2004 [44]. Similar to CMTCT, PDMT is described as a relatively well-circumscribed nodule or multinodular tumor confined to the dermis and/or subcutis with epithelioid to spindle cells arranged in nests, packets, or cords, and surrounded by fibrous septa. A subset of cases exhibits an infiltrating growth pattern. By immunohistochemistry, PDMT is positive for S-100 protein, MITF and HMB-45, variably positive for MelanA and negative for cytokeratins, EMA, SMA, CD34, and synaptophysin. Given the fact that data on the molecular profile of PDMT are not available and both entities display a similar biologic behavior, it is conceivable that a subset of them may harbor the CRTC1::TRIM11 fusion.

8. Conclusions

CMTCT is a potentially novel entity that expands the differential diagnosis of superficial tumors with melanocytic differentiation. Molecular studies may be necessary to reach a definitive diagnosis, especially in challenging cases, when neoplasms with a more aggressive biologic behavior (CCS, melanoma) cannot be categorically excluded. Current data suggest that CMTCT behaves in a low-grade fashion, with only one reported case of recurrence and metastasis after 13 years; however, longer clinical follow-up and additional cases are necessary for definitive conclusions. Treatment of CMTCT was wide excision in the majority of the cases. Targeted therapy with NTRK inhibitors has proven extremely beneficial for patients with NTRK-rearranged neoplasms. Nonetheless, whether or not NTRK upregulation without the corresponding fusion, as observed in CMTCT, is therapeutically actionable remains to be studied. Lastly, although, the role of CRTC1 and TRIM11 in tumorigenesis is well-described, the exact mechanism of action of their fusion product and subsequently the definitive classification of this neoplasm has not yet been determined.
 
 

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/biology10121286

References

  1. Hantschke, M.; Mentzel, T.; Rütten, A.; Palmedo, G.; Calonje, E.; Lazar, A.J.; Kutzner, H. Cutaneous clear cell sarcoma: A clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular analysis of 12 cases emphasizing its distinction from dermal melanoma. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2010, 34, 216–222.
  2. Nawrocki, S.; Fitzhugh, V.A.; Groisberg, R.; Aviv, H.A.; Maghari, A. A rare case of primary dermal clear cell sarcoma with focal epidermotropism: An entity difficult to distinguish from melanoma. J. Cutan. Pathol. 2020, 47, 621–624.
  3. Hisaoka, M.; Ishida, T.; Kuo, T.T.; Matsuyama, A.; Imamura, T.; Nishida, K.; Kuroda, H.; Inayama, Y.; Oshiro, H.; Kobayashi, H.; et al. Clear cell sarcoma of soft tissue: A clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular analysis of 33 cases. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2008, 32, 452–460.
  4. Yoshida, A.; Wakai, S.; Ryo, E.; Miyata, K.; Miyazawa, M.; Yoshida, K.; Motoi, T.; Ogawa, C.; Iwata, S.; Kobayashi, E.; et al. Expanding the phenotypic spectrum of mesenchymal tumors harboring the EWSR1-CREM fusion. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2019, 43, 1622–1630.
  5. Bontoux, C.; Baroudjian, B.; Le Maignan, C.; Vercellino, L.; Farges, C.; Guillemot, D.; Pierron, G.; Lebbé, C.; Battistella, M. CRTC1-TRIM11 fusion in a case of metastatic clear cell sarcoma: Are CRTC1-TRIM11 fusion-bearing tumors melanocytomas or clear cell sarcomas? Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2019, 43, 861–863.
  6. Cellier, L.; Perron, E.; Pissaloux, D.; Karanian, M.; Haddad, V.; Alberti, L.; de la Fouchardière, A. Cutaneous melanocytoma with CRTC1-TRIM11 fusion: Report of 5 cases resembling clear cell sarcoma. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2018, 42, 382–391.
  7. Cassarino, D.S.; Cabral, E.S.; Kartha, R.V.; Swetter, S.M. Primary dermal melanoma: Distinct immunohistochemical findings and clinical outcome compared with nodular and metastatic melanoma. Arch. Dermatol. 2008, 144, 49–56.
  8. Sidiropoulos, M.; Obregon, R.; Cooper, C.; Sholl, L.M.; Guitart, J.; Gerami, P. Primary dermal melanoma: A unique subtype of melanoma to be distinguished from cutaneous metastatic melanoma. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2014, 71, 1083–1092.
  9. Ko, J.S.; Wang, L.; Billings, S.D.; Pissaloux, D.; Tirode, F.; Berry, R.; de La Fouchardiere, A. CRTC1-TRIM11 fusion defined melanocytic tumors: A series of four cases. J. Cutan. Pathol. 2019, 46, 810–818.
  10. Sun, B.K.; Wang, H.; Kim, J.; Chen, J.K.; Sun, L.; Zhang, Y.; Swetter, S.M. Mutational profile of primary dermal melanoma: A case series. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2016, 75, 1263–1265.e5.
  11. Namiki, T.; Yanagawa, S.; Izumo, T.; Ishikawa, M.; Tachibana, M.; Kawakami, Y.; Yokozeki, H.; Nishioka, K.; Kaneko, Y. Genomic alterations in primary cutaneous melanomas detected by metaphase comparative genomic hybridization with laser capture or manual microdissection: 6p gains may predict poor outcome. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 2005, 157, 1–11.
  12. Swetter, S.M.; Ecker, P.M.; Johnson, D.L.; Harvell, J.D. Primary dermal melanoma: A distinct subtype of melanoma. Arch Dermatol. 2004, 140, 99–103.
  13. Lezcano, C.; Shoushtari, A.N.; Ariyan, C.; Hollmann, T.J.; Busam, K.J. Primary and metastatic melanoma with NTRK fusions. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2018, 42, 1052–1058.
  14. Tetzlaff, M.T.; Reuben, A.; Billings, S.D.; Prieto, V.G.; Curry, J.L. Toward a molecular-genetic classification of spitzoid neoplasms. Clin. Lab. Med. 2017, 37, 431–448.
  15. Quan, V.L.; Panah, E.; Zhang, B.; Shi, K.; Mohan, L.S.; Gerami, P. The role of gene fusions in melanocytic neoplasms. J. Cutan. Pathol. 2019, 46, 878–887.
  16. Yeh, I.; Busam, K.J.; McCalmont, T.H.; LeBoit, P.E.; Pissaloux, D.; Alberti, L.; de la Fouchardière, A.; Bastian, B.C. Filigree-like rete ridges, lobulated nests, rosette-like structures, and exaggerated naturation characterize Spitz Tumors with NTRK1 fusion. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2019, 43, 737–746.
  17. Amin, S.M.; Haugh, A.M.; Lee, C.Y.; Zhang, B.; Bubley, J.A.; Merkel, E.A.; Verzì, A.E.; Gerami, P. A Comparison of morphologic and molecular features of BRAF, ALK, and NTRK1 fusion spitzoid neoplasms. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2017, 41, 491–498.
  18. De la Fouchardiere, A.; Pissaloux, D.; Tirode, F.; Karanian, M.; Fletcher, C.D.M.; Hanna, J. Clear Cell Tumor with melanocytic differentiation and ACTIN-MITF translocation: Report of 7 Cases of a novel entity. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2020, 45, 962–968.
  19. De la Fouchardiere, A.; Pissaloux, D.; Tirode, F.; Hanna, J. Clear cell tumor with melanocytic differentiation and MITF-CREM translocation: A novel entity similar to clear cell sarcoma . Virchows Arch. 2021, 479, 1–6.
  20. Jo, V.Y. Myoepithelial Tumors: An Update. Surg. Pathol. Clin. 2015, 8, 445–466.
  21. Hart, J.; Gardner, J.M.; Edgar, M.; Weiss, S.W. Epithelioid schwannomas. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2016, 40, 704–713.
  22. Jo, V.Y.; Fletcher, C.D.M. Epithelioid malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2015, 39, 673–682.
  23. Deyrup, A.T.; Althof, P.; Zhou, M.; Morgan, M.; Solomon, A.R.; Bridge, J.A.; Weiss, S.W. Paraganglioma-like dermal melanocytic tumor: A unique entity distinct from cellular blue nevus, clear cell sarcoma, and cutaneous melanoma. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2004, 28, 1579–1586.
  24. Huang, J.; Tang, L.; Zhao, Y.; Ding, W. TRIM11 promotes tumor angiogenesis via activation of STAT3/VEGFA signaling in lung adenocarcinoma. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2019, 9, 2019–2027.
  25. Hantschke, M.; Mentzel, T.; Rütten, A.; Palmedo, G.; Calonje, E.; Lazar, A.J.; Kutzner, H. Cutaneous clear cell sarcoma: A clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular analysis of 12 cases emphasizing its distinction from dermal melanoma. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2010, 34, 216–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Nawrocki, S.; Fitzhugh, V.A.; Groisberg, R.; Aviv, H.A.; Maghari, A. A rare case of primary dermal clear cell sarcoma with focal epidermotropism: An entity difficult to distinguish from melanoma. J. Cutan. Pathol. 2020, 47, 621–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Hisaoka, M.; Ishida, T.; Kuo, T.T.; Matsuyama, A.; Imamura, T.; Nishida, K.; Kuroda, H.; Inayama, Y.; Oshiro, H.; Kobayashi, H.; et al. Clear cell sarcoma of soft tissue: A clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular analysis of 33 cases. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2008, 32, 452–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Yoshida, A.; Wakai, S.; Ryo, E.; Miyata, K.; Miyazawa, M.; Yoshida, K.; Motoi, T.; Ogawa, C.; Iwata, S.; Kobayashi, E.; et al. Expanding the phenotypic spectrum of mesenchymal tumors harboring the EWSR1-CREM fusion. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2019, 43, 1622–1630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Cassarino, D.S.; Cabral, E.S.; Kartha, R.V.; Swetter, S.M. Primary dermal melanoma: Distinct immunohistochemical findings and clinical outcome compared with nodular and metastatic melanoma. Arch. Dermatol. 2008, 144, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sidiropoulos, M.; Obregon, R.; Cooper, C.; Sholl, L.M.; Guitart, J.; Gerami, P. Primary dermal melanoma: A unique subtype of melanoma to be distinguished from cutaneous metastatic melanoma. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2014, 71, 1083–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Sun, B.K.; Wang, H.; Kim, J.; Chen, J.K.; Sun, L.; Zhang, Y.; Swetter, S.M. Mutational profile of primary dermal melanoma: A case series. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2016, 75, 1263–1265.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Namiki, T.; Yanagawa, S.; Izumo, T.; Ishikawa, M.; Tachibana, M.; Kawakami, Y.; Yokozeki, H.; Nishioka, K.; Kaneko, Y. Genomic alterations in primary cutaneous melanomas detected by metaphase comparative genomic hybridization with laser capture or manual microdissection: 6p gains may predict poor outcome. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 2005, 157, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Swetter, S.M.; Ecker, P.M.; Johnson, D.L.; Harvell, J.D. Primary dermal melanoma: A distinct subtype of melanoma. Arch Dermatol. 2004, 140, 99–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lezcano, C.; Shoushtari, A.N.; Ariyan, C.; Hollmann, T.J.; Busam, K.J. Primary and metastatic melanoma with NTRK fusions. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2018, 42, 1052–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Tetzlaff, M.T.; Reuben, A.; Billings, S.D.; Prieto, V.G.; Curry, J.L. Toward a molecular-genetic classification of spitzoid neoplasms. Clin. Lab. Med. 2017, 37, 431–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Quan, V.L.; Panah, E.; Zhang, B.; Shi, K.; Mohan, L.S.; Gerami, P. The role of gene fusions in melanocytic neoplasms. J. Cutan. Pathol. 2019, 46, 878–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yeh, I.; Busam, K.J.; McCalmont, T.H.; LeBoit, P.E.; Pissaloux, D.; Alberti, L.; de la Fouchardière, A.; Bastian, B.C. Filigree-like rete ridges, lobulated nests, rosette-like structures, and exaggerated naturation characterize Spitz Tumors with NTRK1 fusion. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2019, 43, 737–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Amin, S.M.; Haugh, A.M.; Lee, C.Y.; Zhang, B.; Bubley, J.A.; Merkel, E.A.; Verzì, A.E.; Gerami, P. A Comparison of morphologic and molecular features of BRAF, ALK, and NTRK1 fusion spitzoid neoplasms. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2017, 41, 491–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. De la Fouchardiere, A.; Pissaloux, D.; Tirode, F.; Karanian, M.; Fletcher, C.D.M.; Hanna, J. Clear Cell Tumor with melanocytic differentiation and ACTIN-MITF translocation: Report of 7 Cases of a novel entity. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2020, 45, 962–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. De la Fouchardiere, A.; Pissaloux, D.; Tirode, F.; Hanna, J. Clear cell tumor with melanocytic differentiation and MITF-CREM translocation: A novel entity similar to clear cell sarcoma [published online ahead of print, 2021 Jan 18]. Virchows Arch. 2021, 479, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jo, V.Y. Myoepithelial Tumors: An Update. Surg. Pathol. Clin. 2015, 8, 445–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Hart, J.; Gardner, J.M.; Edgar, M.; Weiss, S.W. Epithelioid schwannomas. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2016, 40, 704–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Jo, V.Y.; Fletcher, C.D.M. Epithelioid malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2015, 39, 673–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Deyrup, A.T.; Althof, P.; Zhou, M.; Morgan, M.; Solomon, A.R.; Bridge, J.A.; Weiss, S.W. Paraganglioma-like dermal melanocytic tumor: A unique entity distinct from cellular blue nevus, clear cell sarcoma, and cutaneous melanoma. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2004, 28, 1579–1586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!
ScholarVision Creations
Feedback