Barium is introduced to the human body usually via ingestion—mostly food (Brazil nuts, seaweed, fish) and water, inhalation, or skin contact
[25][26][44]. According to the literature, Ba
2+ content within the body does not increase regularly with age
[44], and moreover, the average recorded concentrations of barium can vary depending on the region and the way of life
[45][46]. Infants have exhibited the intake of 7.0 ± 4.0 ppm, while adults have slightly higher dose, 8.5 ± 4 ppm
[47]. Even though it is not perceived as a bio-essential element, it has been revealed that the absorbed barium ions are distributed via the blood stream and deposited primarily in the bones (roughly 90% of the body burden, ranging from 0.5–10 µg/g
[25])
[48][49][50]. In addition, Ba
2+ has also been detected in teeth (0.1–3 µg/g), heart, blood, lung, pancreas, kidney, eyes, liver, aorta, brain, eyes, skeletal muscles, spleen, placenta, hair, and urine
[25]. Notwithstanding the fact that Ba
2+ is mostly accumulated in the skeleton, few data exist on the mechanism by which Ba
2+ is deposited. Having a larger ionic radii than Ca
2+ (1.34 Å, hexacoordinated to six negatively charged oxygen atoms, in contrast to 0.99 Å for Ca
2+ [49][51]), Ba
2+ has a greater possibility to be eliminated in the process of recrystallization of hydroxyapatite (HAp)
[49]. Due to this, it is perceivable to assume another mechanism that is taking place in the deposition of Ba
2+ in the bone tissue. In the opinion of Schubert and Conn (1949) and Jowsey, Rowland, and Marshall (1958), described in the paper of Bligh and Taylor
[49], the reaction between barium ions and phosphorous ions (PO
43−) can be associated with the behavior barium has with sulfate ions (SO
42−). While forming barium sulfate, a radiocolloid is being formed, despite the fact that the overall concentration of the ions is insufficient to exceed the normal solubility product of the compound
[49]. Given this, it could be possible that barium is adsorbed on the surface of bone structural elements in the form of colloidal particles due to the reaction with PO
43−. This process is thought to be not only restricted to the areas that are actively calcifying by ionic exchange with Ca
2+, but also by the expeditious irreversible process of surface adsorption
[49]. In order for Ba
2+ to be predisposed for in vivo delivery to bone, it has to be in water-soluble form. Panahifar et al.
[52] examined the spatial distribution of Ba
2+ in the skeleton. The study showed that Ba
2+ was principally integrated in mineralizing areas particularly in the growth plates of rats’ long bones (areas of cartilage located near the ends of bones
[53]). The effect of age on Ba
2+ uptake (dosage was 58.5 mg/kg/day, i.e., 33 mg/kg/day of free Ba
2+) showed that young rats (one month old) incorporated 2.3-fold more Ba
2+ in their bone than old rats (eight month old). Furthermore, Ba
2+ was found in the endosteal and periosteal layers of cortical bone, as well as on the trabecular surfaces of epiphyses, suggesting appositional growth
[48][52]. Compared to Sr
2+, Ba
2+ exhibited faster absorption from the gastrointestinal tract and faster incorporation in bone, but at a smaller concentration
[48]. Studies comparing the effects of high-dose exposures and chronic low-dose exposures of barium on human health are in deficit. However, several records collected from animals claim that high uptake levels of Ba
2+ (150–450 mg/kg/day) are connected with high blood pressure; kidney and liver failure; stimulation of smooth, striated, and cardiac muscles; and disorders of central nervous systems
[25]. Reliable data on the shortage of barium in biological systems are scarce and do not contain the complete aftermath.