A large gap still exists in our knowledge of the effects of dietary supplements on lung cancer risk/mortality in asthmatic smokers and nonsmokers. There is a lack of reliable studies for detecting such an effect says a Griffith University researcher in the journal Nutrients. The researcher undertook a comprehensive review of studies on the topic, and is now calling for trials and studies of these supplements to detect their benefits and harms. The best way to reduce lung cancer risk is to get those at greatest risk of lung cancer (active and passive smokers, particularly those with asthma) to stop smoking or reduce exposure to tobacco smoke. In industrial societies, airborne environmental pollutants are also risk factors. The naturopathy sector makes millions of dollars by making claims about cancer-fighting supplements - this should be backed up with empirical research, and if it's false, those companies should not be profiting from misleading people. Dietary supplements might actually reduce other cancers risk because some studies have made very grand claims.
It has been estimated that around 7 million of global deaths per year were caused by smoking [1-3]. Reviews of published systematic reviews and meta-analysis have confirmed that the risk of lung cancer and asthma has increased in current and former smokers [4-8]. In fact, tobacco smoke is the largest contributor to the most common histological types of lung cancer such as adenocarcinoma and small-cell and squamous cell carcinoma, with over 76% of lung cancer deaths in men and 37-42% of lung cancer deaths in women aged ≥50 years are attributable to tobacco use [9]. Tobacco smoke provokes asthma exacerbations and causes other allergy symptoms to worsen in adults. There is also unequivocal evidence that secondhand smoke exposure is the main contributor to asthma and lung cancer risk in nonsmokers, disproportionately affecting women [4]."People with asthma are generally at higher risk of lung cancer than the general population, whether they smoke or are exposed to tobacco smoke", Dr. Naser Alsharairi from Griffith University said.
There is controversy over the role of dietary supplements in reducing or treating lung cancer in smokers and nonsmokers. There is also much uncertainty about its effectiveness and the consequences in asthmatic smokers and nonsmokers, and our understanding of whether dietary supplements can reduce lung cancer risk in asthmatic smokers and nonsmokers remains unclear in the absence of clinical trials. "In order to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of dietary supplement use by asthmatic smokers and nonsmokers before, during, and after lung cancer treatment, we need realistic and reliable studies worldwide", says Dr. Alsharairi.
Dr. Alsharairi conducted a comprehensive literature review on this topic, searching for prospective studies and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on the effects of supplements and/or vitamin/mineral intake on asthma and lung cancer risk and total mortality rate, with the overall results stratified by smoking status or groups. He identified a total of 20 studies that focused on both lung cancer and asthma.
"The results across studies have been contradictory regarding the effects of dietary supplements on lung cancer risk and mortality in smokers and nonsmokers. However, some studies urged caution in recommending long-term, high-dose supplements that contain β-carotene, retinyl palmitate, B vitamins and vitamin E for lung cancer patients, particularly current and former smokers", says Dr. Alsharairi. He also said "There is too little known about the effects of dietary supplements on asthma risk in smokers. Although vitamin D supplementation alone has proven beneficial in reducing asthma risk in current/former smokers, the intake of vitamin D supplements together with calcium/other supplements may not be advocated. We need more research to clarify the effects of dietary supplements on asthma risk in both smokers and nonsmokers". There is still a gap in knowledge with respect to the effects of dietary supplements on lung cancer risk/mortality in asthmatic smokers and nonsmokers. Dr. Alsharairi is therefore suggesting future trials and prospective studies of these supplements to detect their benefits and harms.
1. Schane, R.E.; Ling, P.M.; Glantz, S.A. Health effects of light and intermittent smoking: A review. Circulation
2010, 121, 1518–1522.
2. West, R. Tobacco smoking: Health impact, prevalence, correlates and interventions. Psychol. Health. 2017, 32,
1018–1036.
3. GBD 2015 Tobacco Collaborators. Smoking prevalence and attributable disease burden in 195 countries and
territories, 1990–2015: A systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet 2017, 389,
1885–1906.
4. Jayes, L.; Haslam, P.L.; Gratziou, C.G.; Powell, P.; Britton, J.; Vardavas, C.; Jimenez-Ruiz, C.; Leonardi-Bee, J.;
Tobacco Control Committee of the European Respiratory Society. SmokeHaz: Systematic reviews and
meta-analyses of the effects of smoking on respiratory health. Chest 2016, 150, 164–179.
5. Skaaby, T.; Taylor, A.E.; Jacobsen, R.K.; Paternoster, L.; Thuesen, B.H.; Ahluwalia, T.S.; Larsen, S.C.; Zhou, A.;
Wong, A.; Gabrielsen, M.E.; et al. Investigating the causal effect of smoking on hay fever and asthma:
A Mendelian randomization meta-analysis in the CARTA consortium. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 2224.
6. Santillan, A.A.; Camargo, C.A., Jr.; Colditz, G.A. A meta-analysis of asthma and risk of lung cancer
(United States). Cancer Causes Control 2003, 14, 327–334.
7. Rosenberger, A.; Bickeböller, H.; McCormack, V.; Brenner, D.R.; Duell, E.J.; Tjønneland, A.; Friis, S.;
Muscat, J.E.; Yang, P.; Wichmann, H.E.; et al. Asthma and lung cancer risk: A systematic investigation by the
International Lung Cancer Consortium. Carcinogenesis 2012, 33, 587–597.
8. Qu, Y.L.; Liu, J.; Zhang, L.X.; Wu, C.M.; Chu, A.J.; Wen, B.L.; Ma, C.; Yan, X.Y.; Zhang, X.; Wang, D.M.; et al.
Asthma and the risk of lung cancer: A meta-analysis. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 48525.
9. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. Global Burden of Disease 2017. 2017. Available online:
http://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-compare/# (accessed on 24 December 2018).
The article has been published on doi: 10.3390/nu11040725