BRCA2: History
View Latest Version
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Subjects: Genetics & Heredity
Contributor:
Jie Liu

The tumor suppressor BRCA2 functions as a central caretaker of genome stability, and individuals who carry BRCA2 mutations are predisposed to breast, ovarian, and other cancers.

  • homologous recombination
  • DNA repair
  • fork protection
  • genome stability

1. Introduction

Genome instability is a fundamental cause of tumorigenesis, and the DNA damage response coordinates multiple DNA repair pathways at the frontline guarding genome integrity. BRCA2 is a prototypical caretaker gene, and its inactivation leads to genomic instability that is associated with oncogene activation and loss of tumor suppressor genes [1]. Thus, individuals who carry BRCA2 mutations have elevated risks for breast, ovarian, prostate, pancreatic, and other cancers [2][3]. BRCA2 -deficient cells exhibit severe DNA repair phenotypes, including gross chromosomal rearrangements, accumulation of chromatid breaks, and hypersensitivity to genotoxins [4][5]. BRCA2 plays a conspicuous role as a mediator in homologous recombination (HR), a high-fidelity DNA repair pathway for double-strand breaks (DSB), and interstrand crosslinks (ICL) with additional functions in DNA replication fork support ( Figure 1 ) [6][7]. In the last ten years, mounting evidence has demonstrated a direct role of BRCA2 in replication fork protection (RFP), both in an HR-dependent and HR-independent manner [8]. Recently, BRCA2 has also been shown to suppress other DSB repair pathways and prevent genomic rearrangements, independent of RAD51 [9]. BRCA2 engages in a multitude of protein interactions affecting its function as well as nuclear or chromosomal localization, including DSS1, PALB2, and EMSY (Figure 2) [10][11][12][13].

Genes 12 01229 g001 550
Figure 1. The mediator role of BRCA2 in homologous recombination. HR is a high-fidelity pathway to repair spontaneous DSBs in somatic cells and programmed DSBs in meiotic cells. DSB ends are first processed by nucleases to generate 3′-tailed ssDNAs, which are immediately covered by RPA. PALB2 interacts with BRCA1 and then recruits BRCA2 to the damaged sites. In meiosis, 3′-tailed ssDNA is bound by RPA and the meiosis-specific ssDNA binding complex SPATA22-MEIOB. BRCA2 is also recruited by meiosis-specific complex MEILB2/HSF2BP-BRME1. The key step of HR is the formation of filaments by RecA-type proteins on ssDNA (RAD51 in somatic cells, RAD51, and the meiosis-specific DMC1 during meiosis) with the simultaneous displacement of RPA and/or SPATA22-MEIOB. The nucleation of these filaments on RPA-coated ssDNA is entirely dependent on BRCA2. Assembled RAD51/DMC1 filaments catalyze homology search and DNA strand invasion of the dsDNA (sister chromatid in somatic cells, homologous chromosome in meiotic cells) to form displacement loops (D-loops). After new DNA synthesis and engaging the second end of the DSB, the joint molecule will be resolved or dissolved to produce crossover and non-crossover products (Right). In the Synthesis-Dependent Strand Annealing (SDSA) pathway, the extended D-loop will be disrupted to produce only non-crossover products (Left). In somatic cells, non-crossovers are preferred to avoid loss-of-heterozygosity, while in meiotic cells, one crossover per chromosome or chromosome arm is preferred to ensure accurate segregation during the first meiotic division and increase genetic diversity (see [14] for detailed discussions of the HR pathway). Meiosis-specific factors are labeled in blue, and only factors discussed in the text are annotated.
Genes 12 01229 g002 550
Figure 2. Structure of BRCA2. (A) Domain structures with mapped sites for selected binding partners and phosphorylation. BRCA2 has two DNA-binding domains (N-terminal DNA-binding domain or NTD, C-terminal DNA-binding domain or CTD), eight BRC repeats interacting with RAD51 and DMC1, a C-terminal RAD51 interaction domain (TR2), and two nuclear localization signals (NLS). Mapped interaction sites with selected protein partners are indicated with red circles and listed in the red box [10][11][12][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. Selected phosphorylation sites with blue stars and sites are listed in the blue box [17][18][25][26]. The proposed breast and ovarian cancer cluster regions (BCCR and OCCR) are labeled with brown lines [27][28]. Several common pathogenic mutations (ClinVar database) and loss-of-function mutations are marked by green stars and listed in the green box [16][29][30][31]. Abbreviation: aa, amino acid; OB fold, Oligonucleotide/Oligosaccharide-Binding fold; T, tower domain (three-helical bundle); P, binding protein; S, phosphorylation site; M, pathogenic mutation site; BCCR, breast cancer cluster region; OCCR, ovarian cancer cluster region. (B) Crystal structures of BRCA2 CTD in a complex with DSS1 alone (top, 1MIU) or with both DSS1 and ssDNA (bottom, 1MJE) [12]. (C) Low-resolution electron microscopic (EM) structures of the dimeric full-length BRCA2 (top, EMD-2779) [32] and the monomeric BRCA2-DSS1-ssDNA complex (bottom, EMD-21998) [33].

2. BRCA2 as a Mediator of DNA DSB Repair

Deficiency of BRCA2 leads to defective HR repair of chromosomal breaks [34][35]. A primary role of BRCA2 in genome stability maintenance is to facilitate the assembly of the nucleoprotein filament of RAD51, the central enzyme in HR. The RAD51 filament is the catalytic scaffold for homology search and DNA strand invasion, the central steps of HR ( Figure 1 ). The 3′ ssDNA overhang generated by DSB resection sets the stage for the orchestrated turnover between initial occupancy of RPA , the eukaryotic ssDNA-binding protein, and later binding of RAD51 and additional proteins such as the RAD51 paralogs and RAD54 [36]. BRCA2 is required for this timely exchange to enable the formation of RAD51 filaments, as shown by biochemical reconstitution with purified full-length BRCA2 protein and supported by genetic and cell biological analyses [4][5][37][38][39][40][41]. BRCA2 is not known to play a direct role in the ensuing steps of D-loop formation, HR-associated DNA synthesis, and the processing of joint molecules to restore intact chromosomes ( Figure 1 ). This section will review the current status of the structure of BRCA2 and discuss the recent progress in characterizing BRCA2 as a mediator protein focusing on three key biochemical functions: DNA binding, turnover of the RPA -ssDNA complex, and RAD51 loading.

The mechanism of recombination mediator proteins has been highly conserved from bacteria to eukaryotes [42]; E. coli RecFOR and the U. maydis BRCA2 homolog (Brh2) serve as paradigms to understand the molecular actions of BRCA2 [43][44][45]. RecFOR and Brh2 recognize the ss/dsDNA junctions and load RecA and RAD51, respectively, onto the junctions to start one-directional filament growth from 5′ to 3′ [44][45][46]. Yeast Rad52 forms a multimeric ring-like structure and wraps ssDNA to destabilize RPA -ssDNA interaction for RAD51 loading [47][48][49]. The tower domain identified in the crystal structure of the BRCA2 CTD indicates a potential binding activity towards dsDNA [12], suggesting that BRCA2 could initiate a unidirectional RAD51 filament growth from an ss/dsDNA junction [12][43][45]. Unexpectedly, full-length BRCA2 displays no preference towards ss/dsDNA junctions and binds with almost equal affinity to 3′-tailed, 5′-tailed, and ssDNA, although tailed DNAs are the preferable substrates in RAD51-mediated strand exchange [37]. It is unknown whether some protein partners might endow structure-selective DNA-binding to BRCA2 towards ss/dsDNA junctions or other more complex DNA intermediates, potentially through altered DNA engagement of different DNA-binding domains (DBD). Overall, it is likely that the DNA-binding activities of BRCA2 and the potential for modulation by its protein partners might be uniquely fitted to its versatile activities in HR and fork stabilization.

Human RAD52 shows no mediator activity in standard reconstituted biochemical reactions [37], except at a sub-stoichiometric RAD51 concentration [50]. Deletion or depletion of RAD52 in mammalian cells causes no major HR defect, and it is generally accepted that BRCA2 is the major mediator in human cells [43][51]. However, unlike yeast Rad52, BRCA2 has no direct interaction with RPA but still stimulates RAD51 filament formation and DNA strand exchange activity in the presence of RPA inhibition [37][38]. More studies of BRCA2 are needed to determine how BRCA2 enables RAD51 filament formation without direct protein interaction with RPA .

Biochemical studies with individual BRC repeats demonstrate that BRC1-4 binds free RAD51 with high affinity, stimulates the formation of RAD51-ssDNA complexes, and prevents RAD51 binding onto dsDNA, while BRC5-8 stabilize RAD51-ssDNA nucleoprotein filaments [19][20]. An FxxA motif, identified from the high-resolution crystal structure of the BRC4-RAD51 complex, binds RAD51 by molecular mimicry of the oligomerization interface between individual RAD51 monomers [52]. The TR2 region was mapped to the extreme C-terminus as a secondary RAD51 binding site ( Figure 2 A). TR2 binds RAD51 filaments and regulates the function of BRCA2 in fork stabilization rather than HR through phosphorylation of the S3291 residue ( Figure 2 A) [53][54][55][56]. It remains unknown whether individual BRC repeats and the TR2 region cooperate in RAD51 recruitment, considering that the binding affinity of full-length BRCA2 to RAD51 is about 100-fold higher than that of an isolated BRC repeat [37]. Surprisingly, BRC5-8-DBD, a protein fragment containing BRC5-8 and the entire CTD (residues 1596–3418), shows enhanced stimulation in RAD51-catalyzed DNA strand exchange and almost full complementation of HR repair deficiency and RAD51 IR-induced foci formation in human BRCA2 knockout cell lines, compared to the same DBD constructs fused with a single BRC4, BRC repeats 1–4, or BRC repeats 1–8 [57]. It remains unclear whether BRC repeats could potentially antagonize each other, and further studies are needed to address these issues.

3. Role of BRCA2 in Replication Fork Restart

Stalled replication forks need to be restarted or converge with another fork to complete genome duplication before cells enter mitosis to prevent catastrophic DNA breakages and eventually cell death. Endogenous DNA lesions can trigger fork blockage or helicase-polymerase uncoupling and thus fork stalling, accompanied by the accumulation of ssDNA gaps [58][59]. Such DNA lesions include base damages, intra- and inter-strand crosslinks (ICLs), and protein-DNA complexes. Fork stalling lesions can also be induced by exogenous sources, such as UV radiation, aphidicolin, and MMC, or replication inhibitors such as hydroxyurea [58][59]. Cells utilize several different mechanisms to restart stalled forks, including fork reversal, fork breakage, translesion synthesis (TLS), and template switching [58][60]. This section will discuss the HR-dependent and HR-independent functions of BRCA2 in supporting replication fork restart, with a focus on fork reversal.

The function of BRCA2 in replication fork support had been linked to its stimulation of RAD51-mediated DNA strand invasion, a key reaction in the HR pathway to repair toxic intermediates produced when replication forks are stalled or broken, such as replication gaps and one-sided DSBs [58]. Surprisingly, recent data demonstrated a novel and HR-independent role of BRCA2 in stabilizing replication forks and protecting them against nuclease degradation [56]. This section will discuss recent progress focusing on the fork protection role of BRCA2 ( Figure 3 ).

Genes 12 01229 g003 550
Figure 3. Roles of BRCA2 in replication fork restart. Under replication stress, stalled or collapsed forks can be restarted by several pathways, including fork reversal (A), homologous recombination to repair one-sided double-stranded breaks formed after fork collapse (B), fork repriming by translesion DNA synthesis bypassing the lesion (C), or by PrimPol-mediated replisome re-initiation downstream of the lesion followed by template switching to repair the associated gap (D). BRCA2 plays both homologous recombination (HR)-dependent and HR-independent roles to support fork restart and maintain fork stability. In fork reversal (A), stalled forks are reversed by RAD51 in two pathways involving DNA translocases (A1: SMARCAL1, ZANRB3, and HLTF; A2: FBH1)) to form chicken foot structures, which are susceptible to nuclease degradation by MRE11, EXO1, and DNA2. BRCA2 (in association with BRCA1 and PALB2), FANCD2, and ABRO1 protect reversed forks against MRE11- and EXO1-mediated resection (A1), while 53BP1, FANCA, BOD1L, and VHL prevent DNA2-mediated degradation (A2). Whether the two pathways generate alternate DNA structures is not known. Reversed forks are restored primarily by the RAD51, MUS81, POLD3 pathway and secondarily by the BRCA2, PALB2, and POLη pathway. The repair of one-sided DSBs (B) by HR is presumed to occur in a fashion highly analogous to the repair of two-sided DSBs (see Figure 1) including the critical mediator function of BRCA2 in RAD51 filament formation. BRCA2 appears to play no role in translesion DNA synthesis (C). Finally, BRCA2 plays a crucial role to facilitate RAD51-mediated HR to repair DNA gaps left behind re-initiated forks (D) by template switching. Arrowheads represent the 3′-OH end.

Fork reversal refers to the active remodeling of stalled replication forks after leading strand blockage, during which a so-called chicken foot structure can be formed by annealing the two newly synthesized sister strands leading to a DSB end ( Figure 3 ). This unique fork architecture was visualized by electron microscopy, occurring at an astounding frequency of 15–30% with all tested genotoxic treatments [59]. The high frequency of fork reversal substantiates its status as a likely physiological response to replication stress. There are two distinct pathways to remodel the forks actively and both require RAD51 but involve different motor proteins [61]. One route involves SMARCAL1 [62][63][64], ZRANB3 [62][65], and HLTF [66][67], all ATPase-dependent DNA translocases of the SWI2/SNF2 family, while the other involves the F-box DNA helicase FBH1, a UvrD homolog [68]. Reversed forks are targeted by multiple nucleases, including MRE11, EXO1, and DNA2 [56][69][70][71][72][73], and require fork protection to prevent nucleolytic degradation. As shown in Figure 3 , reversed forks from these two remodeling pathways are attacked by different nucleases and recruit distinct replication fork protection (RFP) factors [61]. BRCA2 is essential to protect the fork against MRE11-dependent degradation, together with FANCD2 and ABRO1 [61] ( Figure 3 A1). In BRCA2 -deficient cells, the replication fork undergoes massive degradation by MRE11 after HU treatment, as evidenced by DNA fiber assays [56][70][73], electron microscopic imaging [69], and 2D-gel electrophoresis [74]. Fork degradation could be suppressed by either BRCA2 back-complementation or MRE11 inhibition [56]. Depletion of SMARCAL1, ZRANB3, and HLTF, but not FBH1, restores fork stability in BRCA2 -deficient cells, suggesting that they participate in two different subpathways ( Figure 3 A) [61][70][75]. The recruitment of BRCA2 to stalled replication forks is dependent on BRCA1 and PALB2, as depletion of either one leads to fork destabilization [75][76][77]. Additionally, BRCA2 protects the fork from degradation by EXO1, but not DNA2, since knockdown of EXO1, but not DNA2, restores the fork stability in BRCA2 -deficient cells [69]. Instead, DNA2-mediated degradation is suppressed by 53BP1, FANCA, BOD1L, and VHL in the second pathway [61] ( Figure 3 A2). It is unclear what differentiates the two chicken foot pathways and whether there are alternate chicken foot structures.

Template switching relies on HR to bypass DNA lesions utilizing the newly synthesized daughter strand on the sister chromatid as a template for replication fork restart to repair postreplicative gaps [78] ( Figure 3 ). Moreover, extended treatment with hydroxyurea leads to prolonged blocking and breaking of replication forks, which requires the RAD51-mediated HR pathway to restart from one-sided DSBs [79]. MUS81 is responsible for generating these one-sided DSBs, and BRCA2 is expected to function as a mediator protein to facilitate RAD51 filament formation to catalyze homology search and DNA strand invasion ( Figure 3 B) [79][80][81]. An alternative pathway of stalled fork processing is fork repriming, which mainly relies on TLS polymerases to replicate through a damaged template ( Figure 3 C) or by skipping the lesion to reinitiate replisome downstream of the lesion by PrimPol in humans ( Figure 3 D) [58][60].

4. Pathogenic BRCA2 Mutations and BRCA2 Pseudo-Revertants

Loss-of-function mutations in the BRCA1 /2 genes are associated with increased genome instability and predisposition to different but not all forms of cancers. Defects in BRCA2 binding partners and other HR genes result in tumors with similar HR deficiency, termed as “BRCAness”. These tumors initially respond well to DNA damage-based therapies such as ionizing radiation, cisplatin, and PARPi. PARPi exploits the synthetic lethality with BRCA-deficiency (or BRCAness) leading to selective killing of tumor cells [82][83]. This section discusses pathogenic BRCA2 mutants and BRCA2 pseudo-revertants as genetic tools to understand the essential domains of BRCA2 in maintaining genome stability, which ultimately will facilitate future clinical diagnosis and patient treatment.

To date, over 20,000 variants of BRCA2 have been documented in the BRCA Exchange [84], and over 13,000 variants have been reported in the ClinVar database [29]. Almost 3000 variants of BRCA2 in the BRCA Exchange and about 1/3 of the variants in the ClinVar are considered to be pathogenic. Most pathogenic BRCA2 mutations are small insertions or deletions that result in a frameshift, generating a premature stop codon and producing a truncated protein similar to a nonsense mutation. The majority (86%) of the pathogenic variants are frameshift and nonsense mutation, while the rest are splicing and missense variants. Analysis of the mutation distribution among breast and ovarian cancer families identified several regions along the BRCA2 gene with high risks. The ovarian cancer cluster regions (OCCR) largely overlap with the BRC repeats and the helical domain of BRCA2 , whereas the breast cancer cluster regions (BCCR) cover both PALB2/EMSY-binding domains and DNA-binding domains [27][28]. Most of the pathogenic variants are located within these clusters, with the exception that some variants which are located in the C-terminal RAD51-binding domain ( Figure 2 ). The mechanistic basis of why different regions of BRCA2 are hotspots for distinct cancers remains unclear.

PARPi and platinum-based chemotherapy have been used to effectively treat BRCA2 mutant tumors. However, accumulating evidence indicates that tumors develop resistant mechanisms during treatment, and a clinically relevant mechanism is the acquisition of secondary mutations of BRCA2 to regain some degree of BRCA2 activity. These BRCA2 pseudo-revertants can arise from base substitutions and insertions or deletions with various sizes, resulting in a restoration of the BRCA2 open reading frame or removal of the initial deleterious mutations [85][86]. The pancreatic cancer cell line CAPAN-1 features the most prevalent BRCA2 mutation 6174delT lacking the C-terminal 1360 amino acids, including the last BRC repeat, the entire DBD, and the two NLSs [87]. Two of the PARP-inhibitor-resistant (PIR) clones identified from the CAPAN1 line, PIR1 and PIR2, have only recovered the extreme C-terminus containing the TR2 and NLS domains, compared to the original BRCA2 truncation mutant CAPAN1 6174delT [85]. Lacking the entire DBD and BRC6-8, PIR1 and PIR2 are still partly functional, as evidenced by restoration of some damage-induced RAD51 foci formation, reduced chromosomal aberrations, resistance to DNA damage agents, and loss of sensitivity towards PARPi [85]. It is likely that the PIR1 and PIR2 gained partial functions due to their intact protein interaction with PALB2, since the abolishment of PALB2 interaction completely inactivates a BRCA2 construct lacking the entire DBD in HR repair based on a DR-GFP assay [31]. It is unclear if additional genetic changes drive the phenotypes in these CAPAN1 pseudorevertants. The generation of pseudo-reversion mutations in BRCA2 -deficient tumors reflects tumor evolution under selection. There are at least three contributing factors: increased mutation rate due to exposure to genotoxic agents, the lack of error-free DNA repair, and a selective advantage for BRCA1 /2-restored cells during PARPi or platinum treatment [88]. Overall, the restored DNA repair function makes it challenging to target BRCA2 revertant tumors to overcome therapeutic resistance.

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/genes12081229

References

  1. Kinzler, K.W.; Vogelstein, B. Cancer-susceptibility genes. Gatekeepers and caretakers. Nature 1997, 386, 761–763.
  2. King, M.-C.; Marks, J.H.; Mandell, J.B. Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risks Due to Inherited Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Science 2003, 302, 643–646.
  3. Wooster, R.; Bignell, G.; Lancaster, J.; Swift, S.; Seal, S.; Mangion, J.; Collins, N.; Gregory, S.; Gumbs, C.; Micklem, G.; et al. Identification of the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2. Nat. Cell Biol. 1995, 378, 789–792.
  4. Sharan, S.K.; Morimatsu, M.; Albrecht, U.; Lim, D.-S.; Regel, E.; Dinh, C.; Sands, A.; Eichele, G.; Hasty, P.; Bradley, A. Embryonic lethality and radiation hypersensitivity mediated by RAD51 in mice lacking BRCA2. Nat. Cell Biol. 1997, 386, 804–810.
  5. Yu, V.P.; Koehler, M.; Steinlein, C.; Schmid, M.; Hanakahi, L.A.; Van Gool, A.J.; West, S.; Venkitaraman, A.R. Gross chromosomal rearrangements and genetic exchange between nonhomologous chromosomes following BRCA2 inactivation. Genome Res. 2000, 14, 1400–1406.
  6. Prakash, R.; Zhang, Y.; Feng, W.; Jasin, M. Homologous Recombination and Human Health: The Roles of BRCA1, BRCA2, and Associated Proteins. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2015, 7, a016600.
  7. Roy, R.; Chun, J.; Powell, S.N. BRCA1 and BRCA2: Different roles in a common pathway of genome protection. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2011, 12, 68–78.
  8. Rickman, K.; Smogorzewska, A. Advances in understanding DNA processing and protection at stalled replication forks. J. Cell Biol. 2019, 218, 1096–1107.
  9. Han, J.; Ruan, C.; Huen, M.S.Y.; Wang, J.; Xie, A.; Fu, C.; Liu, T.; Huang, J. BRCA2 antagonizes classical and alternative nonhomologous end-joining to prevent gross genomic instability. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1470.
  10. Hughes-Davies, L.; Huntsman, D.; Ruas, M.; Fuks, F.; Bye, J.; Chin, S.-F.; Milner, J.; Brown, L.; Hsu, F.; Gilks, B.; et al. EMSY Links the BRCA2 Pathway to Sporadic Breast and Ovarian Cancer. Cell 2003, 115, 523–535.
  11. Xia, B.; Sheng, Q.; Nakanishi, K.; Ohashi, A.; Wu, J.; Christ, N.; Liu, X.; Jasin, M.; Couch, F.J.; Livingston, D.M. Control of BRCA2 Cellular and Clinical Functions by a Nuclear Partner, PALB2. Mol. Cell 2006, 22, 719–729.
  12. Yang, H.; Jeffrey, P.D.; Miller, J.; Kinnucan, E.; Sun, Y.; Thomä, N.H.; Zheng, N.; Chen, P.-L.; Lee, W.-H.; Pavletich, N.P. BRCA2 Function in DNA Binding and Recombination from a BRCA2-DSS1-ssDNA Structure. Science 2002, 297, 1837–1848.
  13. Martinez, J.S.; Baldeyron, C.; Carreira, A. Molding BRCA2 function through its interacting partners. Cell Cycle 2015, 14, 3389–3395.
  14. Kowalczykowski, S.C. An Overview of the Molecular Mechanisms of Recombinational DNA Repair. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2015, 7, a016410.
  15. Liu, J.; Kruswick, A.; Dang, H.; Tran, A.; Kwon, S.M.; Wang, X.W.; Oberdoerffer, P. Ubiquitin-specific protease 21 stabilizes BRCA2 to control DNA repair and tumor growth. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1–12.
  16. Oliver, A.W.; Swift, S.; Lord, C.; Ashworth, A.; Pearl, L.H. Structural basis for recruitment of BRCA2 by PALB2. EMBO Rep. 2009, 10, 990–996.
  17. Ehlén, A. Proper chromosome alignment depends on BRCA2 phosphorylation by PLK1. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1–21.
  18. Lin, H.-R.; Ting, N.S.Y.; Qin, J.; Lee, W.-H. M Phase-specific Phosphorylation of BRCA2 by Polo-like Kinase 1 Correlates with the Dissociation of the BRCA2-P/CAF Complex. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 35979–35987.
  19. Carreira, A.; Hilario, J.; Amitani, I.; Baskin, R.J.; Shivji, M.K.; Venkitaraman, A.R.; Kowalczykowski, S.C. The BRC Repeats of BRCA2 Modulate the DNA-Binding Selectivity of RAD51. Cell 2009, 136, 1032–1043.
  20. Carreira, A.; Kowalczykowski, S.C. Two classes of BRC repeats in BRCA2 promote RAD51 nucleoprotein filament function by distinct mechanisms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 10448–10453.
  21. Martinez, J.S. BRCA2 regulates DMC1-mediated recombination through the BRC repeats. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 3515–3520.
  22. Zhang, J. A meiosis-specific BRCA2 binding protein recruits recombinases to DNA double-strand breaks to ensure homologous recombination. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1–14.
  23. Brandsma, I.; Sato, K.; van Rossum-Fikkert, S.E.; van Vliet, N.; Sleddens, E.; Reuter, M.; Odijk, H.; Tempel, N.V.D.; Dekkers, D.H.; Bezstarosti, K.; et al. HSF2BP Interacts with a Conserved Domain of BRCA2 and Is Required for Mouse Spermatogenesis. Cell Rep. 2019, 27, 3790–3798.e7.
  24. Hussain, S.; Wilson, J.B.; Medhurst, A.L.; Hejna, J.; Witt, E.; Ananth, S.; Davies, A.; Masson, J.-Y.; Moses, R.; West, S.C.; et al. Direct interaction of FANCD2 with BRCA2 in DNA damage response pathways. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2004, 13, 1241–1248.
  25. Esashi, F.; Christ, N.; Gannon, J.; Liu, Y.; Hunt, T.; Jasin, M.; West, S. CDK-dependent phosphorylation of BRCA2 as a regulatory mechanism for recombinational repair. Nat. Cell Biol. 2005, 434, 598–604.
  26. Yata, K.; Bleuyard, J.-Y.; Nakato, R.; Ralf, C.; Katou, Y.; Schwab, R.A.; Niedzwiedz, W.; Shirahige, K.; Esashi, F. BRCA2 Coordinates the Activities of Cell-Cycle Kinases to Promote Genome Stability. Cell Rep. 2014, 7, 1547–1559.
  27. Rebbeck, T.R.; Mitra, N.; Wan, F.; Sinilnikova, O.M.; Healey, S.; McGuffog, L.; Mazoyer, S.; Chenevix-Trench, G.; Easton, D.F.; Antoniou, A.C.; et al. Association of Type and Location of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations with Risk of Breast and Ovarian Cancer. JAMA 2015, 313, 1347–1361.
  28. Gayther, S.A.; Mangion, J.; Russell, P.; Seal, S.; Barfoot, R.; Ponder, B.A.; Stratton, M.R.; Easton, D. Variation of risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with different germline mutations of the BRCA2 gene. Nat. Genet. 1997, 15, 103–105.
  29. Landrum, M.J. Clin Var: Public archive of interpretations of clinically relevant variants. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, D862–D868.
  30. Jeyasekharan, A.; Liu, Y.; Hattori, H.; Pisupati, V.; Jonsdottir, A.B.; Rajendra, E.; Lee, M.; Sundaramoorthy, E.; Schlachter, S.; Kaminski, C.; et al. A cancer-associated BRCA2 mutation reveals masked nuclear export signals controlling localization. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2013, 20, 1191–1198.
  31. Siaud, N.; Barbera, M.A.; Egashira, A.; Lam, I.; Christ, N.; Schlacher, K.; Xia, B.; Jasin, M. Plasticity of BRCA2 Function in Homologous Recombination: Genetic Interactions of the PALB2 and DNA Binding Domains. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7, e1002409.
  32. Shahid, T.; Soroka, J.; Kong, E.H.; Malivert, L.; Mcilwraith, M.; Pape, T.; West, S.C.; Zhang, X. Structure and mechanism of action of the BRCA2 breast cancer tumor suppressor. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2014, 21, 962–968.
  33. Le, H.P.; Ma, X.; Vaquero, J.; Brinkmeyer, M.; Guo, F.; Heyer, W.-D.; Liu, J. DSS1 and ssDNA regulate oligomerization of BRCA2. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020, 48, 7818–7833.
  34. Moynahan, M.E.; Pierce, A.J.; Jasin, M. BRCA2 Is Required for Homology-Directed Repair of Chromosomal Breaks. Mol. Cell 2001, 7, 263–272.
  35. Xia, F.; Taghian, D.G.; DeFrank, J.S.; Zeng, Z.-C.; Willers, H.; Iliakis, G.; Powell, S.N. Deficiency of human BRCA2 leads to impaired homologous recombination but maintains normal nonhomologous end joining. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 8644–8649.
  36. Zhao, W.; Wiese, C.; Kwon, Y.; Hromas, R.; Sung, P. The BRCA Tumor Suppressor Network in Chromosome Damage Repair by Homologous Recombination. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2019, 88, 221–245.
  37. Jensen, R.B.; Carreira, A.; Kowalczykowski, S.C. Purified human BRCA2 stimulates RAD51-mediated recombination. Nat. Cell Biol. 2010, 467, 678–683.
  38. Liu, J.; Doty, T.; Gibson, B.; Heyer, W.-D. Human BRCA2 protein promotes RAD51 filament formation on RPA-covered single-stranded DNA. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2010, 17, 1260–1262.
  39. Thorslund, T.; Mcilwraith, M.; Compton, S.A.; Lekomtsev, S.; Petronczki, M.; Griffith, J.D.; West, S.C. The breast cancer tumor suppressor BRCA2 promotes the specific targeting of RAD51 to single-stranded DNA. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2010, 17, 1263–1265.
  40. Yuan, S.-S.; Lee, S.Y.; Chen, G.; Song, M.; Tomlinson, G.E.; Lee, E.Y. BRCA2 is required for ionizing radiation-induced assembly of RAD51 complex in vivo. Cancer Res. 1999, 59, 3547–3551.
  41. Fridlich, R.; Annamalai, D.; Roy, R.; Bernheim, G.; Powell, S.N. BRCA1 and BRCA2 protect against oxidative DNA damage converted into double-strand breaks during DNA replication. DNA Repair 2015, 30, 11–20.
  42. Beernink, H.T.; Morrical, S.W. RMPs: Recombination/replication mediator proteins. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1999, 24, 385–389.
  43. Kowalczykowski, S.C. Cancer: Catalyst of a catalyst. Nature 2005, 433, 591–592.
  44. Morimatsu, K.; Kowalczykowski, S.C. RecFOR proteins load RecA protein onto gapped DNA to accelerate DNA strand exchange: A universal step of recombinational repair. Mol. Cell 2003, 11, 1337–1347.
  45. Yang, H.J. The BRCA2 homologue Brh2 nucleates RAD51 filament formation at a dsDNA-ssDNA junction. Nature 2005, 433, 653–657.
  46. Morimatsu, K.; Wu, Y.; Kowalczykowski, S.C. RecFOR Proteins Target RecA Protein to a DNA Gap with Either DNA or RNA at the 5′ Terminus Implication for Repair of Stalled Replication Forks. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 35621–35630.
  47. Shinohara, A. Rad52 forms ring structures and co-operates with RPA in single-strand annealing. Genes Cells 1998, 3, 145–156.
  48. Kagawa, W.; Kurumizaka, H.; Ishitani, R.; Fukai, S.; Nureki, O.; Shibata, T.; Yokoyama, S. Crystal Structure of the Homologous-Pairing Domain from the Human Rad52 Recombinase in the Undecameric Form. Mol. Cell 2002, 10, 359–371.
  49. Singleton, M.; Wentzell, L.M.; Liu, Y.; West, S.; Wigley, D.B. Structure of the single-strand annealing domain of human RAD52 protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 13492–13497.
  50. Benson, F.E.; Baumann, P.; West, S. Synergistic actions of RAD51 and Rad52 in recombination and DNA repair. Nat. Cell Biol. 1998, 391, 401–404.
  51. Liu, J.; Heyer, W.D. Who’s who in human recombination: BRCA2 and RAD52. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 441–442.
  52. Pellegrini, L.; Yu, D.S.; Lo, T.; Anand, S.; Lee, M.; Blundell, T.L.; Venkitaraman, A.R. Insights into DNA recombination from the structure of a RAD51–BRCA2 complex. Nat. Cell Biol. 2002, 420, 287–293.
  53. Davies, O.R.; Pellegrini, L. Interaction with the BRCA2 C terminus protects RAD51–DNA filaments from disassembly by BRC repeats. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2007, 14, 475–483.
  54. Esashi, F.; Galkin, V.E.; Yu, X.; Egelman, E.; West, S. Stabilization of RAD51 nucleoprotein filaments by the C-terminal region of BRCA2. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2007, 14, 468–474.
  55. Petalcorin, M.I.R.; Galkin, V.E.; Yu, X.; Egelman, E.H.; Boulton, S.J. Stabilization of RAD-51-DNA filaments via an interaction domain in Caenorhabditis elegans BRCA2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 8299–8304.
  56. Schlacher, K.; Christ, N.; Siaud, N.; Egashira, A.; Wu, H.; Jasin, M. Double-Strand Break Repair-Independent Role for BRCA2 in Blocking Stalled Replication Fork Degradation by MRE11. Cell 2011, 145, 529–542.
  57. Chatterjee, G.; Jimenez-Sainz, J.; Presti, T.; Nguyen, T.; Jensen, R.B. Distinct binding of BRCA2 BRC repeats to RAD51 generates differential DNA damage sensitivity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, 5256–5270.
  58. Li, X.; Heyer, W.-D. Homologous recombination in DNA repair and DNA damage tolerance. Cell Res. 2008, 18, 99–113.
  59. Zellweger, R. RAD51-mediated replication fork reversal is a global response to genotoxic treatments in human cells. J. Cell Biol. 2015, 208, 563–579.
  60. Berti, M.; Vindigni, A. Replication stress: Getting back on track. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2016, 23, 103–109.
  61. Liu, W.; Krishnamoorthy, A.; Zhao, R.; Cortez, D. Two replication fork remodeling pathways generate nuclease substrates for distinct fork protection factors. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, eabc3598.
  62. Ciccia, A.; Nimonkar, A.V.; Hu, Y.; Hajdu, I.; Achar, Y.J.; Izhar, L.; Petit, S.A.; Adamson, B.; Yoon, J.C.; Kowalczykowski, S.C.; et al. Polyubiquitinated PCNA Recruits the ZRANB3 Translocase to Maintain Genomic Integrity after Replication Stress. Mol. Cell 2012, 47, 396–409.
  63. Bétous, R.; Couch, F.B.; Mason, A.C.; Eichman, B.F.; Manosas, M.; Cortez, D. Substrate-Selective Repair and Restart of Replication Forks by DNA Translocases. Cell Rep. 2013, 3, 1958–1969.
  64. Bétous, R.; Mason, A.C.; Rambo, R.P.; Bansbach, C.E.; Badu-Nkansah, A.; Sirbu, B.M.; Eichman, B.F.; Cortez, D. SMARCAL1 catalyzes fork regression and Holliday junction migration to maintain genome stability during DNA replication. Genes Dev. 2012, 26, 151–162.
  65. Yuan, J.; Ghosal, G.; Chen, J. The HARP-like Domain-Containing Protein AH2/ZRANB3 Binds to PCNA and Participates in Cellular Response to Replication Stress. Mol. Cell 2012, 47, 410–421.
  66. Kile, A.C.; Chavez, D.A.; Bacal, J.; Eldirany, S.; Korzhnev, D.M.; Bezsonova, I.; Eichman, B.F.; Cimprich, K.A. HLTF’s Ancient HIRAN Domain Binds 3′ DNA Ends to Drive Replication Fork Reversal. Mol. Cell 2015, 58, 1090–1100.
  67. Blastyák, A.; Hajdú, I.; Unk, I.; Haracska, L. Role of Double-Stranded DNA Translocase Activity of Human HLTF in Replication of Damaged DNA. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2010, 30, 684–693.
  68. Fugger, K.; Mistrik, M.; Neelsen, K.J.; Yao, Q.; Zellweger, R.; Kousholt, A.N.; Haahr, P.; Chu, W.K.; Bartek, J.; Lopes, M.; et al. FBH1 Catalyzes Regression of Stalled Replication Forks. Cell Rep. 2015, 10, 1749–1757.
  69. Lemaçon, D.; Jackson, J.; Quinet, A.; Brickner, J.R.; Li, S.; Yazinski, S.; You, Z.; Ira, G.; Zou, L.; Mosammaparast, N.; et al. MRE11 and EXO1 nucleases degrade reversed forks and elicit MUS81-dependent fork rescue in BRCA2-deficient cells. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1–12.
  70. Mijic, S.; Zellweger, R.; Chappidi, N.; Berti, M.; Jacobs, K.; Mutreja, K.; Ursich, S.; Chaudhuri, A.R.; Nussenzweig, A.; Janscak, P.; et al. Replication fork reversal triggers fork degradation in BRCA2-defective cells. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1–11.
  71. Kolinjivadi, A.M.; Sannino, V.; De Antoni, A.; Zadorozhny, K.; Kilkenny, M.; Técher, H.; Baldi, G.; Shen, R.; Ciccia, A.; Pellegrini, L.; et al. Smarcal1-Mediated Fork Reversal Triggers Mre11-Dependent Degradation of Nascent DNA in the Absence of BRCA2 and Stable RAD51 Nucleofilaments. Mol. Cell 2017, 67, 867–881.e7.
  72. Thangavel, S. DNA2 drives processing and restart of reversed replication forks in human cells. J. Cell Biol. 2015, 208, 545–562.
  73. Ying, S.; Hamdy, F.C.; Helleday, T. Mre11-Dependent Degradation of Stalled DNA Replication Forks Is Prevented by BRCA2 and PARP1. Cancer Res. 2012, 72, 2814–2821.
  74. Lomonosov, M.; Anand, S.; Sangrithi, M.; Davies, R.; Venkitaraman, A.R. Stabilization of stalled DNA replication forks by the BRCA2 breast cancer susceptibility protein. Genes Dev. 2003, 17, 3017–3022.
  75. Taglialatela, A.; Alvarez, S.; Leuzzi, G.; Sannino, V.; Ranjha, L.; Huang, J.-W.; Madubata, C.; Anand, R.; Levy, B.; Rabadan, R.; et al. Restoration of Replication Fork Stability in BRCA1- and BRCA2-Deficient Cells by Inactivation of SNF2-Family Fork Remodelers. Mol. Cell 2017, 68, 414–430.e8.
  76. Chaudhuri, A.R.; Callen, E.; Ding, X.; Gogola, E.; Duarte, A.A.; Lee, J.-E.; Wong, N.; Lafarga, V.; Calvo, J.A.; Panzarino, N.J.; et al. Replication fork stability confers chemoresistance in BRCA-deficient cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2016, 535, 382–387.
  77. Murphy, A.K.; Fitzgerald, M.; Ro, T.; Kim, J.H.; Rabinowitsch, A.; Chowdhury, D.; Schildkraut, C.L.; Borowiec, J.A. Phosphorylated RPA recruits PALB2 to stalled DNA replication forks to facilitate fork recovery. J. Cell Biol. 2014, 206, 493–507.
  78. Higgins, N.; Kato, K.; Strauss, B. A model for replication repair in mammalian cells. J. Mol. Biol. 1976, 101, 417–425.
  79. Petermann, E.; Orta, M.L.; Issaeva, N.; Schultz, N.; Helleday, T. Hydroxyurea-Stalled Replication Forks Become Progressively Inactivated and Require Two Different RAD51-Mediated Pathways for Restart and Repair. Mol. Cell 2010, 37, 492–502.
  80. Hanada, K.; Budzowska, M.; Davies, S.L.; Van Drunen, E.; Onizawa, H.; Beverloo, H.B.; Maas, A.; Essers, J.; Hickson, I.D.; Kanaar, R. The structure-specific endonuclease Mus81 contributes to replication restart by generating double-strand DNA breaks. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2007, 14, 1096–1104.
  81. Adar, S.; Izhar, L.; Hendel, A.; Geacintov, N.; Livneh, Z. Repair of gaps opposite lesions by homologous recombination in mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, 5737–5748.
  82. Bryant, H.E.; Schultz, N.; Thomas, H.D.; Parker, K.M.; Flower, D.; Lopez, E.; Kyle, S.; Meuth, M.; Curtin, N.; Helleday, T. Specific killing of BRCA2-deficient tumours with inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Nat. Cell Biol. 2005, 434, 913–917.
  83. Farmer, H.; McCabe, N.; Lord, C.; Tutt, A.N.J.; Johnson, D.A.; Richardson, T.B.; Santarosa, M.; Dillon, K.J.; Hickson, I.; Knights, C.; et al. Targeting the DNA repair defect in BRCA mutant cells as a therapeutic strategy. Nat. Cell Biol. 2005, 434, 917–921.
  84. Cline, M.S. BRCA Challenge: BRCA Exchange as a global resource for variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2. PLoS Genet 2018, 14, e1007752.
  85. Edwards, S.; Brough, R.; Lord, C.; Natrajan, R.; Vatcheva, R.; Levine, D.A.; Boyd, J.; Reis-Filho, J.S.; Ashworth, A. Resistance to therapy caused by intragenic deletion in BRCA2. Nat. Cell Biol. 2008, 451, 1111–1115.
  86. Sakai, W.; Swisher, E.M.; Karlan, B.Y.; Agarwal, M.K.; Higgins, J.; Friedman, C.; Villegas, E.; Jacquemont, C.; Farrugia, D.J.; Couch, F.J.; et al. Secondary mutations as a mechanism of cisplatin resistance in BRCA2-mutated cancers. Nat. Cell Biol. 2008, 451, 1116–1120.
  87. Goggins, M.; Schutte, M.; Lu, J.; Moskaluk, C.A.; Weinstein, C.L.; Petersen, G.M.; Yeo, C.J.; Jackson, C.E.; Lynch, H.T.; Hruban, R.H.; et al. Germline BRCA2 gene mutations in patients with apparently sporadic pancreatic carcinomas. Cancer Res. 1996, 56, 5360–5364.
  88. Dhillon, K.K.; Swisher, E.M.; Taniguchi, T. Secondary mutations of BRCA1/2 and drug resistance. Cancer Sci. 2011, 102, 663–669.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!
ScholarVision Creations
Feedback