The built environment refers to human-made physical spaces for living, working and recreation. It ranges in scale from buildings, public and open spaces to neighbourhoods and communities, as well as streets and transportation systems. The built environment has a significant impact on the wellbeing and quality of life of older adults.
2.1. Age-Friendly Housing and Buildings
Older adults tend to spend considerably more time at home compared to other age groups
[9]. Homes provide older adults with familiar physical setting and emotional affinity in terms of personal experiences and memories
[10]. Although ageing may involve deterioration in mobility, visual or hearing abilities and affect cognition and mental capability, it is still desirable for older adults to continue to live in their own homes as long as possible under the notion of ‘ageing in place’
[11]. The concept of ageing in place is broad, involving personal attachment to place
[12]. Attachment to place enables older adults to preserve a sense of identity and independence
[13]. Ageing in place does not necessarily imply the continual stay in the same dwelling throughout the later life, but also includes the scenario of downsizing or moving to another home with better accessibility to maximise the use of remaining abilities for independent or assisted living
[14].
There are a range of housing options for older adults depending on their degree of mobility and levels of impairment, from ordinary houses, apartment units and retirement housing for independent living, extra care housing with required personal support for assisted living, to residential aged care facilities with nursing care for institutional living
[15]. In this continuum of housing options, one end is the long-term family home available in the ordinary housing market, whereas another end is the institutional setting of residential aged care facilities for those who are vulnerable with high levels of dependency. Supporting older adults to age in place at their home settings can delay or obviate the need to move to institutional aged care facilities
[16].
Housing design with due consideration of the changing needs across the life course caters for ageing in place. The rationale is to support accessibility and facilitate the ease of movement for a wide range of abilities of residents to enable them to live independently, safely and comfortably to minimise the need for subsequent alternation and retrofitting. Age-friendly housing not only provides benefits to residents for ageing well, but also has public value to reduce the resources spent on institutional care facilities
[17]. People have spent more time at home than ever before especially during the coronavirus lockdown periods. Under the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, residential aged care facilities have experienced significant challenges to control infection and minimise disease transmission by enforcing no outside visitor policies and requiring residents to remain in their rooms. However, these measures have had ongoing detrimental effects on the overall health and wellbeing of residents
[18]. This highlights the importance of enabling older adults to remain in their own homes as long as possible through age-friendly housing design and technology-supported smart home provisions.
There are different approaches towards increased accessibility and adaptability of housing and buildings such as universal design, inclusive design, design for all and accessible design
[19][20][21]. Despite the lack of consistent terminology, the rationale behind accessibility is quite similar, highlighting the importance of non-discrimination, social inclusion and equity
[22]. Design guidelines and accreditation schemes of age-friendly housing have been established in some developed countries, such as Lifetime Homes Design Guide in the UK, Livable Housing Design Guidelines in Australia and the newly developed Homes4Life in Europe.
The idea of the Lifetime Homes Standard originated from the Helen Hamlyn foundation and the Habinteg Housing Association in the late 1980s. It is based on five overarching principles: inclusivity, accessibility, adaptability, sustainability and good value with 16 design criteria to address the changing needs of individuals and families at different stages of life
[23]. The Lifetime Homes Design Guide heavily influenced the development of accessibility requirements of the Building Regulations in the UK. Referring to Part M of the Building Regulations, M4(1) is mandatory to set the minimum standards of accessibility for visitable dwellings, while M4(2) and M4(3) are optional for accessible and adaptable dwellings and wheelchair user dwellings, respectively, in which the optional requirement of M4(2) is broadly equivalent to the Lifetime Homes Design Guide. The minimum baseline standard of M4(1) has been criticised to be too low to meet the actual needs
[24][25]. A consultation paper was published by the UK government in 2020 to consider how to raise accessibility standards of new homes
[26].
The Livable Housing Design Guidelines was developed as an outcome of the National Dialogue on Universal Housing Design which was formed in 2009 consisting of representatives from the government, key stakeholder groups from the ageing, disability and community support sectors and the residential building and property industry. The voluntary guidelines describe 15 liveable design elements which provide guidance on the expected performance to achieve silver, gold or platinum level accreditation. The first seven elements cover the core requirements of the basic silver level accreditation, whereas the platinum level requires the compliance of all 15 elements
[27]. According to the strategic plan in 2010, the original target was set to require all new houses to comply with silver level by 2020
[28]. However, such voluntary provision was hard to achieve the aspirational target
[29][30]. Only a low proportion of 5% of new housing could comply with the guidelines by 2020
[31]. Australia is a signatory to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) and has obligations about universal design in housing
[32]. Considering the failure to meet the 2020 target, the United Nations Committee (New York, NY, USA) supported the recommendation for a mandated approach through legislation
[33]. A majority of building ministers in Australia finally agreed to include minimum accessibility provisions for residential housing and apartments in the National Construction Code 2022 based on the silver level of the Livable Housing Design Guidelines
[34].
The Homes4Life project titled ‘certified smart and integrated living environments for ageing well’ is a new European certification scheme which started in December 2018 after receiving funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement no. 826295). The project is run by a multidisciplinary group from five countries (Spain, France, The Netherlands, Italy and Belgium)
[35]. By adopting a holistic approach, the evaluation framework of Homes4Life covers six aspects: physical, outdoor access, economic, social, personal and management domains for both new and existing residential buildings. Affordability, privacy and dignity, identity and emotional connectivity are taken into consideration. Compared with the Lifetime Homes Design Guide in the UK and the Livable Housing Design Guidelines in Australia, Home4Life puts a specific focus on smart home technologies. For encouraging digitally enriched dwellings to support home-based independent living, the category of smart readiness is introduced in the Homes4Life certification scheme, covering wireless and wired connectivity, network infrastructure and interoperability, IT infrastructure and application programming interfaces, as well as digital security and data protection
[36]. Such comprehensive evaluation framework aims to provide a more responsive age-friendly housing for older adults equipped with digital services (such as telecommunication, telehealth and telecare) to maintain social connectedness, health and wellbeing across the life course, together with home-based monitoring technologies with motion sensors, real-time monitoring and reliable alerts to mitigate risks and ensure their safety and security at home
[37][38][39].
It is important for buildings, especially public facilities, to be easily accessible and conveniently used regardless of the age, ability or status of end users. Features that are considered necessary for age-friendly buildings include ramps, elevators, handrails, slip-resistant flooring, seating, accessible public toilets, signage and priority parking bays. Barrier-free buildings address the needs of older adults and empower them to participate in society with inclusion and equity.
2.2. Age-Friendly Public Spaces and Neighbourhoods/Communities
Age-friendly housing and buildings are associated with accessible public and outdoor spaces as well as effective social support services and facilities within neighbourhoods to enhance the quality of life and wellbeing of older adults. It is common for older adults to feel lonely and depressed, especially for those who are living alone without a spouse or a partner
[40][41]. If public spaces are age-friendly for people to feel safe and comfortable, their willingness to spend time outside will increase. Popular public spaces, such as cafes, parks, shopping malls, libraries, markets and community centres, are regarded as third places, which are different from the first place (home) or the second place (work/school)
[42]. Third places foster voluntary social interaction and provide opportunities for older adults to engage in their local communities to form weak and strong social ties with others against isolation and loneliness
[43].
There is a close relationship between the built environment, physical activity and health
[44][45]. Regular physical activity contributes to beneficial health effects against overweight or obesity
[45]. Since walking is a key outdoor physical activity of older adults, so the built environment is commonly assessed by its walkability
[46]. A neighbourhood walkability depends on the land use mix, street connectivity and residential density
[47]. An appropriate functional mix integrating residential, commercial and communal uses attracts people to go outside on various schedules. Street connectivity correlates with the street pattern and block size and is an indicator of how accessible a neighbourhood is. Residential density refers to the dense concentration of people, which is regarded as an important condition for ‘flourishing city life’ and ‘a visibly lively public street life’
[48]. Older adults living in mixed-use, better connected and more compact neighbourhoods are more likely to be active as the walking distances between destinations and homes are shortened
[49]. Other factors that affect the walkability of the built environment include pedestrian safety from vehicular traffic with lower speed limits and more road crossings, connectivity of pedestrian facilities, public safety from crime and violence, trees and vegetation for shading and amenity, adequate lighting for illumination, distinctive signage for wayfinding, user-friendly street furniture and inclusive urban design with barrier-free access
[50][51][52].
The notion of ageing in place extends from age-friendly housing to neighbourhoods and communities. Ageing in place encourages older adults with some degree of independent living ability to remain in their familiar surroundings for longer to maintain their routines, habits and ongoing social connections with others
[53]. It is beneficial for older adults to stay in familiar neighbourhoods and communities in their later life, which provides them with a sense of security and belonging. Secure neighbourhoods encourage older adults to spend time outside in confidence to participate in various activities, which enhance cross-generational social encounters. The strategy of lifetime homes and lifetime neighbourhoods was launched in the UK in 2008 to promote a range of affordable and accessible housing choices, to enable residents to connect with other people at the community level and to empower them to develop lifetime neighbourhoods
[54]. The six key components of lifetime neighbourhoods are: housing, the built and natural environments, services and amenities, social networks/wellbeing, accessibility and resident empowerment
[55]. Similarly, the
Lifelong Communities Handbook: Creating Opportunities for Lifelong Living was published in 2009 in the US
[56]. The seven principles of lifelong communities are: diversity of dwelling types, neighbourhood retail and services, pedestrian access and transit, connectivity, social interaction, healthy living and consideration for existing residents. An enabling built environment with associated social infrastructure supports health and wellbeing over an individual’s lifetime
[57].
2.3. Age-Friendly Transportation
Walkable age-friendly neighbourhoods and communities provide a safe and well-connected pedestrian network with various transport modes. The availability and accessibility of safe, frequent and reliable public transport facilitates older adults to get around and enhance their mobility. Service quality and travel safety perceptions affect the perceived accessibility of public transport
[58]. The age-friendly design of train stations, tram and bus stops is equipped with seating benches, shelters and adequate lighting. The provisions of ramps, elevators and escalators to platforms and low-floor boarding onto buses offer ease of access. Priority seats on public transport encourage passengers to offer seats to older adults and other users in need. The affordability of public transport is also a factor to be considered. In some countries, older adults are entitled to concession fares or even free access to public transport such as buses, trains and trams. This allows them to access to health-related services and communal facilities. Travelling by public transport provides opportunities for social encounters and enables the enjoyment of ‘the spectacle of others’ interactions and the sense of life going on’
[59]. Mobility enhancement through the use of public transport leads to an increase in the quality of life of older adults and a reduction in social exclusion
[60].
In addition to walkability, the built environment can be assessed by its bikeability or level of bicycle-friendliness
[61]. Cycling is an environmentally sustainable transportation mode to reduce vehicle use and improve air quality. It is also a form of physical activity that contributes to public health as part of an active ageing agenda
[62]. Factors affecting the cycling participation of older adults include segregation from vehicular traffic, safety, other cyclists’ behaviour, convenience and availability of the relevant infrastructure
[63]. Electric bicycles (also called e-bikes) are increasingly popular and stimulate cycling participation. E-bikes are battery-driven and enable users to ride longer distances in comfort with reduced effort
[64]. From the planning perspective, it is important to design and provide well-connected bike tracks (or cycling trails) to stimulate transportation cycling among older adults.
For those older adults living in suburbs and remote areas with a lack of public transport, car ownership is associated with their mobility and wellbeing closely. The continuing decline in cognitive, sensory and physical abilities of older adults may cause slow reaction times, poor eyesight, hearing impairment, attention difficulty and memory loss, resulting in driving risks and other safety concerns
[65]. Driving cessation is a difficult and challenging issue for older adults, especially for those who have been used to driving. The transition to a non-driving status leads to a sense of loss of independence and the feeling of depression
[66][67]. The emergence of fully-autonomous or driverless vehicles may be a solution to offer stress-free door-to-door mobility and increase travel opportunities for older adults, but the popularity of this emerging transport technology depends on its accessibility, reliability and affordability
[68][69].