Muscle Fatigue and Motorcycle: History
View Latest Version
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Subjects: Physiology
Contributor:
Michel Marina

Motorcycle road races last from 30 to 45 min, representing about 20 to 25 laps consisting of 12 to 20 curves. This profile requires thereby 200 brakes and 400 leans per race at velocities generally greater than 200 km/h that should be managed with accurate synergistic muscle contractions from different part of the body, despite the development of muscle fatigue. However, only a few studies have investigated muscle fatigability via surface electromyography (sEMG) in riders that were performed either in a laboratory environment or outside the track. At present, only two studies have reported an accurate fatigue assessment yielded during a real piloting setup. Nevertheless, both studies monitored a pilot driving a motorcycle in a motorway or normal road environment, much less demanding and stressful than a racetrack.

  • electromyography
  • motorcycles
  • muscle strength
  • forearm
  • hand strength
  • neurophysiology

1. Overview

The sEMG signals were recorded unilaterally from biceps brachii (BB), triceps brachii (TB), anterior and posterior part of the deltoid (DA and DP respectively), flexor digitorum superficialis (FS), extensor carpi radialis (CR), extensor digitorum communis (ED) and pectoralis major (PM) during three rounds of 30 min. sEMG signals selected for analysis came from the beginning of the braking action to the way-out of the curves of interest. Considering the laps and rounds as a whole and focusing on the forearm muscles, ED was more systematically (84%) assigned to a state of fatigue than FS (44%) and CR (39%). On the opposite, the TB and DP muscles showed a predominant state of force increase (72%). Whereas the BB showed alternatively a state of fatigue or force increase depending on the side of the curve, when taking into account only the sharpest curves, it showed a predominant state of force increase. In conclusion, the fact that forearm muscles must endure a long-lasting maintenance of considerable activity levels explains why they easily got into a state of fatigue. Moreover, TB and DA are particularly relevant when cornering. 

2. Surface Electromyogram

Motorcycle road races last from 30 to 45 min, representing about 20 to 25 laps consisting of 12 to 20 curves. This profile requires thereby 200 brakes and 400 leans per race at velocities generally greater than 200 km/h [1] that should be managed with accurate synergistic muscle contractions from different part of the body, despite the development of muscle fatigue [2]. However, only a few studies have investigated muscle fatigability via surface electromyography (sEMG) in riders that were performed either in a laboratory environment [3][4][5] or outside the track [2]. At present, only two studies have reported an accurate fatigue assessment yielded during a real piloting setup [6][7]. Nevertheless, both studies monitored a pilot driving a motorcycle in a motorway or normal road environment, much less demanding and stressful than a racetrack.
Another limitation in studying muscle fatigability during track motorcycle race is related to the interpretation of changes in sEMG during force-varying contractions. It is widely accepted that muscle fatigability represents a progressive decrease in the capacity of an individual to produce high levels of force or to maintain steady force output, a decrease that starts from the beginning of the exercise [8][9][10]. However, such assessments are rather difficult in an “on-track” experimental set-up.
Another common technique to evaluate muscle fatigability is the surface electromyogram (sEMG), which records the electrical activity associated with muscle contraction. During sustained isometric submaximal contractions, fatigue cause an increase in sEMG amplitude (time domain analysis), and a decrease in the power spectrum (frequency domain analysis) [11][12][13]. sEMG amplitude increases could be explained by a combination of an enhanced recruitment of fibers with higher action potential [12] and an increased synchronization of the motor units [14]. On the other hand, power spectrum decreases could account for an indirect measure of the metabolic status of the muscle cell membrane [15], based on matched behavior with conduction velocity of the action potentials that propagate along the muscle fiber membrane, and muscle lactic acid, due to a restricted blood flow [16]. However, these electrical indices have some limitations during force-varying contractions [17]. Accordingly, Luttmann et al. [18] developed the joint analysis of sEMG spectrum and amplitude (JASA), which combines the time and frequency domains of the sEMG signal, allowing to define four quadrants [18][19][20][21]: (1) force increase (root mean square (RMS) and mean frequency (MF) increase), (2) fatigue (RMS increase and MF decrease), (3) recovery (RMS decrease and MF increase), and (4) force decrease (RMS and MF decrease). This approach allows to determine a reliable pattern of sEMG during repeated tasks with similar force production and has been successfully used to assess neuromuscular fatigue in occupational labor [20], such as a surgery [18], wheelchair maneuvers [19], virtual environments [22], construction [21], or cycling [23].
Very little information is available about the required muscular load during the different actions that take place during a motorcycle road race. In consequence, we could say that up to now, physical training programs in this sport have been based on empirical knowledge and not on scientific evidence. Therefore, the objectives of this study were (1) to assess the muscle activity changes that occur during riding on a road-race track, and (2) to find out whether muscle fatigue develops when riding a motorcycle during consecutive rounds of a training session on a circuit. We hypothesized that the most demanded muscles should be the flexor superficialis digitorum (FS), as the agonist of the brake-pulling action against the lever [4][24], accompanied by the extensor digitorum (ED) considered as the antagonist pair of the FS. Co-contraction of ED and carpi radialis (CR) is supposed to occur during the braking phase and entry of the curve because of their wrist stabilization role already observed in power grip tasks [25][26]. Based on the previous hypothesis, we supposed that at the end of the training sessions, at least some of these muscles should get into a fatigue state. Knowing the high inertial forces that must be managed by the motorcycle riders [1][27], we additionally hypothesized that a complex interplay should exist between the agonist/antagonist pair mainly responsible for the stabilization of the elbow (biceps brachii versus triceps brachii; BB/TB) as well as for the role of the shoulders, when transmitting forces from de handlebar to the rest of the body and vice versa. With respect to the last hypothesis, the occurrence of fatigue should change the leadership figures and synergies among these muscles.
The relevance of these data should be considered with respect to the difficulty to obtain reliable sEMG recordings while riders drove at high speeds carrying on all measurement instruments despite heat, sudation, and movement artifacts. This challenging experiment opens new area for applied research in motorcycling.

3. Conclusions

It seems that pushing-like muscles, such as TB and DA, have sufficient relevance as to be seriously considered during physical conditioning specifically oriented to motorcycle racing. Among the always highly demanded forearm muscles, ED was more demanded and fatigued than FS and CR. Whereas PM and DA were fatigued especially in the last round, TB and DP showed a state of force increase. This state was particularly predominant in the BB muscle in the sharpest curves.

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/ijerph18157738

References

  1. D’Artibale, E.; Laursen, P.B.; Cronin, J.B. Profiling the physical load on riders of top-level motorcycle circuit racing. J. Sports Sci. 2018, 36, 1061–1067.
  2. Marina, M.; Porta, J.; Vallejo, L.; Angulo, R. Monitoring hand flexor fatigue in a 24-h motorcycle endurance race. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 2011, 21, 255–261.
  3. Marina, M.; Rios, M.; Torrado, P.; Busquets, A.; Angulo-Barroso, R. Force-time course parameters and force fatigue model during an intermittent fatigue protocol in motorcycle race riders. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 2015, 25, 406–416.
  4. Marina, M.; Torrado, P.; Busquets, A.; Ríos, J.G.; Angulo-Barroso, R. Comparison of an intermittent and continuous forearm muscles fatigue protocol with motorcycle riders and control group. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 2013, 23, 84–93.
  5. Torrado, P.; Cabib, C.; Morales, M.; Valls-Solé, J.; Marina, M. Neuromuscular Fatigue after Submaximal Intermittent Contractions in Motorcycle Riders. Int. J. Sports Med. 2015, 94, 922–928.
  6. Balasubramanian, V.; Jagannath, M. Detecting motorcycle rider local physical fatigue and discomfort using surface electromyography and seat interface pressure. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 2014, 22, 150–158.
  7. Rashid, H.; Omar, A.R.; Jaafar, R.; Abdullah, S.C.; Ma’arof, M.I.N.; Fauzi, W.M.S.W.; Haron, R.; Mahmud, Z.; Shapie, M.A.M.; Ismail, M.A.M. Usage of wireless Myon 320 surface electromyography (sEMG) system in recording motorcyclist muscle activities on real roads: A case study. Procedia Manuf. 2015, 3, 2566–2573.
  8. Bigland-Ritchie, B.; Cafarelli, E.; Vøllestad, N.K. Fatigue of submaximal static contractions. Acta Physiol. Scand. Suppl. 1986, 556, 137–148.
  9. Enoka, R.; Duchateau, J. Muscle fatigue: What, why and how it influences muscle function. J. Physiol. 2008, 586, 11–23.
  10. Søgaard, K.; Gandevia, S.C.; Todd, G.; Petersen, N.T.; Taylor, J.L. The effect of sustained low-intensity contractions on supraspinal fatigue in human elbow flexor muscles. J. Physiol. 2006, 573, 511–523.
  11. Broman, H.; Bilotto, G.; De Luca, C.J. Myoelectric signal conduction velocity and spectral parameters: Influence of force and time. J. Appl. Physiol. 1985, 58, 1428–1437.
  12. Moritani, T.; Muro, M.; Nagata, A. Intramuscular and surface electromyogram changes during muscle fatigue. J. Appl. Physiol. 1986, 60, 1179–1185.
  13. Dimitrov, G.V.; Arabadzhiev, T.I.; Hogrel, J.Y.; Dimitrova, N.A. Simulation analysis of interference EMG during fatiguing voluntary contractions. Part II—Changes in amplitude and spectral characteristics. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 2008, 18, 35–43.
  14. Furness, P.; Jessop, J.; Lippold, O.C. Long-lasting increases in the tremor of human hand muscles following brief, strong effort. J. Physiol. 1977, 265, 821–831.
  15. Komi, P.V.; Tesch, P. EMG frequency spectrum, muscle structure, and fatigue during dynamic contractions in man. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol. 1979, 42, 41–50.
  16. De Luca, C.J. The use of surface electromyography in biomechanics. J. Appl. Biomech. 1997, 13, 135–163.
  17. De Luca, C.J. Myoelectrical manifestations of localized muscular fatigue in humans. CRC Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 1984, 11, 251–279.
  18. Luttmann, A.; Jager, M.; Sokeland, J.; Laurig, W. Electromyographical study on surgeons in urology. II. Determination of muscular fatigue. Ergonomics 1996, 39, 298–313.
  19. Jonkers, I.; Nuyens, G.; Seghers, J.; Nuttin, M.; Spaepen, A. Muscular effort in multiple sclerosis patients during powered wheelchair manoeuvres. Clin. Biomech. 2004, 19, 929–938.
  20. Luttmann, A.; Jäger, M.; Laurig, W. Electromyographical indication of muscular fatigue in occupational field studies. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 2000, 25, 645–660.
  21. Oh, K.W.; Kim, D.; Hong, D. Performance evaluation of excavator control device with EMG-based fatigue analysis. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 2014, 15, 193–199.
  22. Vuong, B.; McConville, K.M. Use of recurrence quantification analysis in virtual reality training: A case study. In Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE Toronto International Conference Science and Technology for Humanity (TIC-STH), Toronto, ON, Canada, 26–27 September 2009; pp. 849–854.
  23. Chen, S.W.; Liaw, J.W.; Chan, H.L.; Chang, Y.J.; Ku, C.H. A real-time fatigue monitoring and analysis system for lower extremity muscles with cycling movement. Sensors 2014, 14, 12410–12424.
  24. Marina, M.; Torrado, P.; Baudry, S.; Duchateau, J. Forearm muscles fatigue induced by repetitive braking on a motorcycle is best discriminated by specific kinetic parameters. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0246242.
  25. Smith, A.M. The coactivation of antagonist muscles. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 1981, 59, 733–747.
  26. Finneran, A.; O’Sullivan, L. Effects of grip type and wrist posture on forearm EMG activity, endurance time and movement accuracy. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 2013, 43, 91–99.
  27. D’Artibale, E.; Neville, J.; Cronin, J.B. Inertial stresses of national and international motorcycle circuit racing riders. Int. J. Sports Sci. Coach. 2020, 15, 728–737.
More
© Text is available under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.
This entry is offline, you can click here to edit this entry!
ScholarVision Creations
Feedback