HER Tyrosine Kinases in Rhabdomyosarcoma: History
Please note this is an old version of this entry, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Subjects: Oncology

EGFR is highly expressed by embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (ERMS) tumors and cell lines, in some cases contributing to tumor growth. If not mutated, HER2 is not directly involved in control of RMS cell growth but can be expressed at significant levels, with a slight prevalence for alveolar RMS (ARMS). A minority of ERMS carries a HER2 mutation with driving activity on tumor growth. HER3 is frequently overexpressed by RMS and can play a role in the residual myogenic differentiation ability and in resistance to signaling-directed therapy. HER family members could be exploited for therapeutic approaches in two ways: blocking with antibodies or inhibitors the HER member driving tumor growth and targeting expressed HER members to vehiculate toxins or immune effectors.

  • rhabdomyosarcoma
  • HER2
  • EGFR
  • targeted therapy
  • CAR-T
  • precision medicine

1. Introduction

Rhabdomyosarcomas (RMS) are tumors of the skeletal muscle lineage, mainly occurring in children and adolescents. RMS are identified by the expression of markers of myogenic differentiation such as desmin, myogenin and MyoD1. The classification of RMS was initially based on pathological features; the two prevalent subtypes showed alveolar or embryonal-like pattern morphologies and are referred to as alveolar or embryonal RMS (ARMS or ERMS, respectively). Heterogeneity in histology, biomarkers, molecular driver events and clinical outcome led to a reclassification of RMS subtypes [1][2][3][4] that takes into account the molecular events. In fact, the study of gene expression profiles highlighted a major role for the presence/absence of a translocation between PAX3/7 and FOXO1 genes, leading to a major dichotomy between fusion-positive RMS and fusion-negative RMS [1][5]. A large genomic characterization was designed to further refine risk stratification based on additional molecular alterations [6].

The main oncogenic driver of fusion-positive RMS is the product of fusion itself (the PAX3/7–FOXO1 chimeric transcription factor), but a cooperating event is needed, such as gene amplifications (MYCN, CDK4 or MIR-17–92) or deletions (CDKN2A, loss of heterozygosity in 11p15.5) [7]. Mutations in BCOR, NF1, TP53 and PIK3CA were sporadically found in fusion-positive RMS [6]. PAX3/7–FOXO1 targets include receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK), which are consequently overexpressed and actively signaling along the RAS/Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) axis [8].
Fusion-negative RMS have a higher degree of aneuploidy and a heterogeneous mutation burden comprising of coexisting and alternative mutations in RTK/RAS/PI3K pathway. Activation of the RAS pathway can be found frequently and can be caused by mutations of RAS itself or by alternative events, either upstream RAS (such as mutations in RTK) or downstream RAS (such as BRAF) [7][9]. More than half of fusion-negative RMS showed mutation of any RAS pathway member [6]. Additional relevant mutations in BCOR, NF1 and TP53 were found in fusion-negative RMS [6]. A major hallmark of fusion-negative RMS is the loss of heterozygosity at 11p15 or uniparental paternal disomy of the entire chromosome 11 [9]. The 11p15 region contains various genes, including HRAS and insulin-like growth factor 2 (IGF2). IGF2 is consequently overexpressed due to the loss of imprinting. Loss of heterozygosity at 11p15 and activation of RAS pathway are early events in the genesis of fusion-negative RMS [10].

For high and very high-risk RMS new therapeutic strategies are urgently needed [11]. New therapeutic targets can be identified through the study of oncogenic drivers causing RMS. RTK of the HER family can be involved in the onset of RMS and in therapeutic targeting strategies.

2. Expression of HER Family Members in Human RMS Subtypes

High expression level EGFR was found in the majority of ERMS (Table 1), at quite strong expression levels, suggesting EGFR as an additional diagnostic marker for ERMS [3][12]. EGFR was only sporadically expressed by ARMS. The higher EGFR expression by ERMS versus ARMS was also observed at the mRNA level [13]. HER2 was expressed by a fraction of RMS, with a slight prevalence for ARMS [14]. Both EGFR and HER2 were phosphorylated in RMS, while normal skeletal muscle did not show any phosphorylated form of these RTK [15].

Table 1. The expression of HER family members in RMS subtypes.
HER Family Member ARMS ERMS Other
Subtypes
Intensity at Immuno- Histochemistry Amplification/Mutation Reference
EGFR 16% 76%   Moderate to strong No amplification a at 7p11.2 [14]
13% 84% 42% b Strong in ERMS   [16]
32% 55% 73% c     [17]
29% 93%       [12]
HER2 41% 26%     No amplification a [14]
6% 6% 27% c     [17]
    70% d     [18]
a fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), 66 cases of which 32 ARMS and 34 ERMS. b fusion-negative ARMS. c PRMS (pleomorphic RMS). d head and neck RMS (29 cases, of which 18 were ERMS, 10 were ARMS and 1 was PRMS)

Through the study of publicly available microarray experiments, the HER family expression in RMS was compared to that of normal muscle [19]. EGFR expression by ERMS was higher than that of normal muscle. RMS overexpressed HER3 versus normal muscle, with a higher HER3 expression in ARMS than in ERMS. HER4 was downmodulated in RMS versus normal muscle.

3. The Role of HER Family in the Onset and Malignancy of RMS

HER2 amplification was sporadically reported in small series of ERMS [20][21]. In a large RMS series an expressed mutation of HER2 was found in two cases of fusion-negative RMS (mutations R678Q or S310F), corresponding to 1.4% of total RMS cases (3.2% of fusion-negative RMS cases), while no event was found in fusion-positive RMS [7]. Among RMS cell lines listed in the somatic mutation COSMIC database, only TE-441-T (classified as ERMS, even though no characterization is available, see [22]) carries a mutation in the HER2 gene (R432W) [23]. Therefore, for a small fraction of fusion-negative RMS cases the somatic mutation in HER2 gene can be an oncogenic driver.

HER3 can mediate RMS differentiation induced by glial-derived growth factor 2 (a specific ligand of HER3 that stimulates normal myogenesis), in the absence of effects on cell growth [24].

HER3 could also play a protumoral role. The HER3 zebrafish homologue (HES3) is a target gene of the PAX3–FOXO1 chimeric transcription factor resulting from translocation and HES3/HER3 overexpression in fusion-positive RMS was associated with a significantly reduced survival [25]. In the ERMS RD cell line, the induced overexpression of HER3 caused increased cell growth while HER3 silencing determined a decreased growth [19]. The study of an RMS-related miRNA signature, common to all RMS subtypes [26], showed that a commonly downregulated miRNA in RMS is the oncosuppressor miR-22. HER3 transcript contains in its 3′UTR a functional response element to miR-22. The upregulation of HER3 is a mechanism of primary resistance to MEK inhibitors shown by RMS [26].

A transgenic rat HER2/neu allele, activated by point mutation V664E, if coupled to an inactivated p53 tumor suppressor allele, caused high-penetrance genitourinary RMS in male mice [27]. Tumors showed typical markers of RMS (desmin, myosin and a high expression of IGF2) and histologically resembled ERMS. This HER2-driven RMS murine model has an advantage over other RMS murine models due to the predictable site of onset. This allowed us to perform immunoprevention studies: both active and passive immune approaches succeeded in specific delay of RMS onset [28][29]. HER2-driven RMS are triggered at the genitourinary site of male mice by the coincidental increased expression of HER2 and the under-expression of p53. The two genetic alterations foster p53 loss, IGF2 autocriny and overexpression of p19Arf and p21Cip1 [30].

4. HER Family Members as Therapeutic Targets

EGFR is mainly expressed by ERMS cell lines, as well as by primary tumors. In some ERMS cell lines (but not all), EGFR can contribute to tumor growth. Strategies to suppress EGFR activity through the use of neutralizing antibodies [13][31][32] and transduction of the antisense construct [33] generally caused an impairment of the proliferative ability of EGFR-positive RMS cells, with low/null effect on myogenic differentiation.

HER2 expression level detected in RMS cells by cytofluorometric analysis was sizeable, but it was at least two orders of magnitude lower than that reported for HER2-overexpressing SK-OV-3 human carcinoma cells [34]. The few cases of breast cancer with HER2 mutations (about 1.6%) might be candidates for anti-HER2 inhibitors [35].

HER family members can crosstalk with other RTK members, being involved in the onset of resistance to treatments directed against other receptors for growth factors [36].

The expression of HER family members in RMS cells was exploited to vehiculate toxic agents. This approach could in principle be active even when target antigens are not essential for tumor growth. Immunotoxins targeting HER2 or HER3 did not cause any effect on growth or differentiation of RMS cells [34]. The authors attributed the different efficacy of EGFR versus HER-2/HER-3 immunotoxins to the different endocytic routing of HER receptors, rather than to expression levels of the various target antigens [34].

HER family members expression via RMS could be exploited for use in the targeting of immune cells to tumors by chimeric antigen receptors (CAR). A good safety profile was shown by HER2-CAR-T exploiting the scFv derived from the FRP5 anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody. FRP5-derived HER2-CAR-T cells determined remission in a child with score 3 HER2-positive fusion-negative ARMS, metastatic to bone marrow and refractory to conventional therapy [37]. After relapse, a further remission was determined by HER2-CAR-T administration combined to the checkpoint inhibitor PD-1 blocking antibody. The setup of CAR-directed therapy seems particularly promising, but the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment likely requires that a combined treatment with checkpoint inhibitors be applied.

Alternative effectors to be transduced with HER2-CAR constructs could be cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells that are in vitro-expanded immune effectors exhibiting T and NK phenotypes (so-called T-NK) and a non-MHC-restricted cytotoxic ability [38] Engineering of HER2-CAR into cells with NK phenotype of various origin has been proposed as an "off-the-shelf" approach for HER2-expressing RMS [39]

 

This entry is adapted from the peer-reviewed paper 10.3390/cells10071808

References

  1. Skapek, S.X.; Ferrari, A.; Gupta, A.A.; Lupo, P.J.; Butler, E.; Shipley, J.; Barr, F.G.; Hawkins, D.S. Rhabdomyosarcoma. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2019, 5, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Leiner, J.; Le Loarer, F. The current landscape of rhabdomyosarcomas: An update. Virchows Arch. 2020, 476, 97–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Rudzinski, E.R.; Kelsey, A.; Vokuhl, C.; Linardic, C.M.; Shipley, J.; Hettmer, S.; Koscielniak, E.; Hawkins, D.S.; Bisogno, G. Pathology of childhood rhabdomyosarcoma: A consensus opinion document from the Children’s Oncology Group, European Paediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group, and the Cooperative Weichteilsarkom Studiengruppe. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 2021, 68, e28798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Pappo, A.; Gartrell, J. Recent advances in understanding and managing pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma. F1000Research 2020, 9, F1000. [Google Scholar]
  5. Stephen X. Skapek; James Anderson; Frederic G. Barr Md; Julia A. Bridge; Julie M. Gastier-Foster; David M. Parham; Erin R. Rudzinski; Timothy Triche Md; Douglas S. Hawkins; PAX-FOXO1 fusion status drives unfavorable outcome for children with rhabdomyosarcoma: A children's oncology group report. Pediatric Blood & Cancer 2013, 60, 1411-1417, 10.1002/pbc.24532.
  6. Jack F. Shern; Joanna Selfe; Elisa Izquierdo; Rajesh Patidar; Hsien-Chao Chou; Young K. Song; Marielle E. Yohe; Sivasish Sindiri; Jun Wei; Xinyu Wen; et al. Genomic Classification and Clinical Outcome in Rhabdomyosarcoma: A Report From an International Consortium. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2021, 39, 2859-2871, 10.1200/jco.20.03060.
  7. Jack F. Shern; L. Chen; Thomas Badgett; Gad Getz; Juliann Chmielecki; Jaume Mora; James R. Anderson; Stephen X. Skapek; Frederic G. Barr; Matthew Meyerson; et al. Comprehensive genomic analysis of rhabdomyosarcoma reveals a landscape of alterations affecting a common genetic axis in fusion-positive and fusion-negative tumors.. Cancer Discovery 2014, 4, 216-31, 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-13-0639.
  8. Celine Chen; Heathcliff Dorado Garcia; Monika Scheer; Anton G. Henssen; Current and Future Treatment Strategies for Rhabdomyosarcoma. Frontiers in Oncology 2019, 9, 1458, 10.3389/fonc.2019.01458.
  9. Katherine Robbins; Deborah L. Stabley; Jennifer Holbrook; Rebecca Sahraoui; Alexa Sadreameli; Katrina Conard; Laura Baker; Karen W. Gripp; Katia Sol-Church; Paternal uniparental disomy with segmental loss of heterozygosity of chromosome 11 are hallmark characteristics of syndromic and sporadic embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A 2016, 170, 3197-3206, 10.1002/ajmg.a.37949.
  10. Li Chen; Jack F. Shern; Jun S. Wei; Marielle E. Yohe; Young K. Song; Laura Hurd; Hongling Liao; Daniel Catchpoole; Stephen X. Skapek; Frederic G. Barr; et al. Clonality and Evolutionary History of Rhabdomyosarcoma. PLOS Genetics 2015, 11, e1005075-e1005075, 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005075.
  11. Miwa, S.; Yamamoto, N.; Hayashi, K.; Takeuchi, A.; Igarashi, K.; Tsuchiya, H. Recent advances and challenges in the treatment of rhabdomyosarcoma. Cancers 2020, 12, 1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Beate Grass; Marco Wachtel; Silvia Behnke; Ivo Leuschner; Felix K Niggli; Beat W Schäfer; Immunohistochemical detection of EGFR, fibrillin-2, P-cadherin and AP2β as biomarkers for rhabdomyosarcoma diagnostics. Histopathology 2009, 54, 873-879, 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2009.03303.x.
  13. Delia Herrmann; Guido Seitz; Steven W. Warmann; Michael Bonin; Jörg Fuchs; Sorin Armeanu-Ebinger; Cetuximab Promotes Immunotoxicity Against Rhabdomyosarcoma In Vitro. Journal of Immunotherapy 2010, 33, 279-286, 10.1097/cji.0b013e3181c549b0.
  14. Ramapriya Ganti; Stephen X Skapek; Jie Zhang; Christine E Fuller; Jianrong Wu; Catherine A Billups; Philip P Breitfeld; James D Dalton; William H Meyer; Joseph D Khoury; et al. Expression and genomic status of EGFR and ErbB-2 in alveolar and embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma. Modern Pathology 2006, 19, 1213-1220, 10.1038/modpathol.3800636.
  15. Ling Cen; Kristy J Arnoczky; Fu-Chuan Hsieh; Huey-Jen Lin; Stephen J Qualman; Songlin Yu; Huiyun Xiang; Jiayuh Lin; Phosphorylation profiles of protein kinases in alveolar and embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma. Modern Pathology 2007, 20, 936-946, 10.1038/modpathol.3800834.
  16. Marco Wachtel; Tina Runge; Ivo Leuschner; Sabine Stegmaier; Ewa Koscielniak; Jörn Treuner; Bernhard Odermatt; Silvia Behnke; Felix K. Niggli; Beat W. Schäfer; et al. Subtype and Prognostic Classification of Rhabdomyosarcoma by Immunohistochemistry. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2006, 24, 816-822, 10.1200/jco.2005.03.4934.
  17. Paul M. Armistead Md; Jason Salganick; Jae S. Roh; Dejka M. Steinert; Shreyaskumar Patel; Mark Munsell; Adel K. El-Naggar; Robert S. Benjamin; Wei Zhang; Jonathan C. Trent Md; et al. Expression of receptor tyrosine kinases and apoptotic molecules in rhabdomyosarcoma. Cancer 2007, 110, 2293-2303, 10.1002/cncr.23038.
  18. Cleverton Roberto de Andrade; Ademar Takahama Jr; Inês Nobuko Nishimoto; Luiz Paulo Kowalski; Márcio Ajudarte Lopes; Rhabdomyosarcoma of the head and neck: a clinicopathological and immunohistochemical analysis of 29 cases. Brazilian Dental Journal 2010, 21, 68-73, 10.1590/s0103-64402010000100011.
  19. Janne Nordberg; John Patrick Mpindi; Kristiina Iljin; Arto Tapio Pulliainen; Markku Kallajoki; Olli Kallioniemi; Klaus Elenius; Varpu Elenius; Systemic Analysis of Gene Expression Profiles Identifies ErbB3 as a Potential Drug Target in Pediatric Alveolar Rhabdomyosarcoma. PLOS ONE 2012, 7, e50819, 10.1371/journal.pone.0050819.
  20. Mark, H.F.L.; Brown, S.; Sun, C.L.; Samy, M.; Afify, A. Fluorescent in situ hybridization detection of HER-2/neu gene amplification in rhabdomyosarcoma. Pathobiology 1998, 66, 59–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Walther, C.; Mayrhofer, M.; Nilsson, J.; Hofvander, J.; Jonson, T.; Mandahl, N.; Øra, I.; Gisselsson, D.; Mertens, F. Genetic heterogeneity in rhabdomyosarcoma revealed by SNP array analysis. Genes Chromosom. Cancer 2016, 55, 3–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. E Sokolowski; C B Turina; Ken Kikuchi; D M Langenau; C Keller; Proof-of-concept rare cancers in drug development: the case for rhabdomyosarcoma. Oncogene 2013, 33, 1877-1889, 10.1038/onc.2013.129.
  23. John G Tate; Sally Bamford; Harry C Jubb; Zbyslaw Sondka; David M Beare; Nidhi Bindal; Harry Boutselakis; Charlotte G Cole; Celestino Creatore; Elisabeth Dawson; et al. COSMIC: the Catalogue Of Somatic Mutations In Cancer. Nucleic Acids Research 2018, 47, D941-D947, 10.1093/nar/gky1015.
  24. C. Ricci; L. Landuzzi; I. Rossi; C. De Giovanni; G. Nicoletti; A. Astolfi; S. Pupa; S. Menard; Katia Scotlandi; Patrizia Nanni; et al. Expression of HER/erbb family of receptor tyrosine kinases and induction of differentiation by glial growth factor 2 in human rhabdomyosarcoma cells. International Journal of Cancer 2000, 87, 29-36, 10.1002/1097-0215(20000701)87:1<29::aid-ijc5>3.0.co;2-j.
  25. Genevieve C Kendall; Sarah Watson; Lin Xu; Collette LaVigne; Whitney Murchison; Dinesh Rakheja; Stephen X Skapek; Franck Tirode; Olivier Delattre; James F Amatruda; et al. PAX3-FOXO1 transgenic zebrafish models identify HES3 as a mediator of rhabdomyosarcoma tumorigenesis. eLife 2018, 7, e33800, 10.7554/elife.33800.
  26. Francesca Bersani; Marcello Francesco Lingua; Deborah Morena; Valentina Foglizzo; Silvia Miretti; Letizia Lanzetti; Giovanna Carrá; Alessandro Morotti; Ugo Ala; Paolo Provero; et al. Deep Sequencing Reveals a Novel miR-22 Regulatory Network with Therapeutic Potential in Rhabdomyosarcoma. Cancer Research 2016, 76, 6095-6106, 10.1158/0008-5472.can-16-0709.
  27. Patrizia Nanni; Giordano Nicoletti; Carla De Giovanni; Stefania Croci; Annalisa Astolfi; Lorena Landuzzi; Emma DI Carlo; Manuela Iezzi; Piero Musiani; Pier-Luigi Lollini; et al. Development of rhabdomyosarcoma in HER-2/neu transgenic p53 mutant mice.. Cancer Research 2003, 63, 2728-2732, .
  28. Croci, S.; Nicoletti, G.; Landuzzi, L.; De Giovanni, C.; Astolfi, A.; Marini, C.; Di Carlo, E.; Musiani, P.; Forni, G.; Nanni, P.; et al. Immunological prevention of a multigene cancer syndrome. Cancer Res. 2004, 64, 8428–8434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. De Giovanni, C.; Landuzzi, L.; Palladini, A.; Ianzano, M.L.; Nicoletti, G.; Ruzzi, F.; Amici, A.; Croci, S.; Nanni, P.; Lollini, P.L. Cancer vaccines co-targeting HER2/NEU and IGF1R. Cancers 2019, 11, 517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Marianna L. Ianzano; Stefania Croci; Giordano Nicoletti; Arianna Palladini; Lorena Landuzzi; Valentina Grosso; Dario Ranieri; Massimiliano Dall'Ora; Ilaria Santeramo; Milena Urbini; et al. Tumor suppressor genes promote rhabdomyosarcoma progression in p53 heterozygous, HER-2/neu transgenic mice. Oncotarget 2013, 5, 108-119, 10.18632/oncotarget.1171.
  31. De Giovanni, C.; Melani, C.; Nanni, P.; Landuzzi, L.; Nicoletti, G.; Frabetti, F.; Griffoni, C.; Colombo, M.P. Redundancy of autocrine loops in human rhabdomyosarcoma cells: Induction of differentiation by suramin. Br. J. Cancer 1995, 72, 1224–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Granados, V.A.; Avirneni-Vadlamudi, U.; Dalal, P.; Scarborough, S.R.; Galindo, K.A.; Mahajan, P.; Galindo, R.L. Selective targeting of myoblast fusogenic signaling and differentiation-arrest antagonizes rhabdomyosarcoma cells. Cancer Res. 2019, 79, 4585–4591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. C De Giovanni; Lorena Landuzzi; F Frabetti; G Nicoletti; Cristiana Griffoni; I Rossi; M Mazzotti; L Scotto; Patrizia Nanni; Pier Luigi Lollini; et al. Antisense epidermal growth factor receptor transfection impairs the proliferative ability of human rhabdomyosarcoma cells.. Cancer Research 1996, 56, 3898-3901, .
  34. Cinzia Ricci; Letizia Polito; Patrizia Nanni; Lorena Landuzzi; Annalisa Astolfi; Giordano Nicoletti; Ilaria Rossi; Carla De Giovanni; Andrea Bolognesi; Pier-Luigi Lollini; et al. HER/erbB Receptors as Therapeutic Targets of Immunotoxins in Human Rhabdomyosarcoma Cells. Journal of Immunotherapy 2002, 25, 314-323, 10.1097/00002371-200207000-00003.
  35. Robert Roskoski; Small molecule inhibitors targeting the EGFR/ErbB family of protein-tyrosine kinases in human cancers. Pharmacological Research 2018, 139, 395-411, 10.1016/j.phrs.2018.11.014.
  36. Fei Huang; Ann Greer; Warren Hurlburt; Xia Han; Rameh Hafezi; Gayle M. Wittenberg; Karen Reeves; Jiwen Chen; Douglas Robinson; Aixin Li; et al. The Mechanisms of Differential Sensitivity to an Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 Receptor Inhibitor (BMS-536924) and Rationale for Combining with EGFR/HER2 Inhibitors. Cancer Research 2008, 69, 161-170, 10.1158/0008-5472.can-08-0835.
  37. Meenakshi Hegde; Sujith K. Joseph; Farzana Pashankar; Christopher DeRenzo; Khaled Sanber; Shoba Navai; Tiara T. Byrd; John Hicks; Mina L. Xu; Claudia Gerken; et al. Tumor response and endogenous immune reactivity after administration of HER2 CAR T cells in a child with metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma. Nature Communications 2020, 11, 1-15, 10.1038/s41467-020-17175-8.
  38. Michael Merker; Verena Pfirrmann; Sarah Oelsner; Simone Fulda; Thomas Klingebiel; Winfried S. Wels; Peter Bader; Eva Rettinger; Generation and characterization of ErbB2-CAR-engineered cytokine-induced killer cells for the treatment of high-risk soft tissue sarcoma in children. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 66137-66153, 10.18632/oncotarget.19821.
  39. Gossel, L.D.H.; Heim, C.; Pfeffermann, L.M.; Moser, L.M.; Bönig, H.B.; Klingebiel, T.E.; Bader, P.; Wels, W.S.; Merker, M.; Rettinger, E. Retargeting of nk-92 cells against high-risk rhabdomyosarcomas by means of an erbb2 (Her2/neu)-specific chimeric antigen receptor. Cancers 2021, 13, 1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
More
Video Production Service